Convergent evolution and parallelism in plant domestication revealed by an expanding archaeological record

Advances in the Archaeobotany of Plant Domestication

Archaeobotany consists of the recovery and study of plant remains from archaeological sites. Although methods of recovery and analysis have improved, there has also been an increase in the number of sites and species studied and a broadening range of geographical regions subject to analysis (7, 9, 13–16). Along with botanical field studies of wild relatives of crops, this has led to recognition of a larger number of centers of agricultural origins, perhaps more than 20 (1, 8). For a number of crops, it is now becoming possible to compare domestication processes across species and geographical centers, thus allowing us to characterize similarities and differences. The present paper makes explicit comparisons of seed crop domestication and vegecultural domestication processes from several regions.

Cereal crops are at the core of many agricultural systems and the seeds are highly visible in the archaeological record and, thus, lend themselves to quantitative studies on domestication and agricultural origins. Further, they may be directly dated by radiocarbon (15). The past decades have seen considerable methodological advances in identification criteria for crop subspecies and cereal varieties (e.g., refs. 16 and 17). Whereas the morphological distinction between wild and domesticated cereals has long been recognized (18), it is only in the last decade that substantial quantities of preserved remains have become available from Southwest Asia (7, 19, 20) and from Asian rice (21). In the New World, important pseudocereals, such as Chenopodium spp., have seen increased attention in terms of seed coat traits that relate to germination inhibition, an important target of selection during domestication (9, 15). In a wide range of taxa, metrical traits of seed size or phytolith size can be compared over time.

Where vegeculture was the focus of food production, poor preservation has made domestication traits harder to document. Advances have been made, however, in the study of phytoliths and starches, most notably of tuber crops, as well as evidence of landscape modification (22, 23). In the Neotropics, the field has been revolutionized by microfossil evidence of domesticated crops that precede, in some cases by many millennia, empirical evidence for established agricultural practices (22, 24). Additional inferences have relied on cross-examining geoarchaeological, genetic, and botanical evidence, suggesting, for example, the influence of cultivation practices on the development of varietal differences of manioc (Manihot esculenta) (25). In New Guinea, early human-managed habitats have been inferred. For instance, early agriculture based on the vegetative propagation of plants, including bananas, taro, and some yams, has been dated to 7000–6400 B.P. based on archaeological remains of former cultivation plots on old land surfaces, dramatic degradation of montane rainforest to grasslands, and microbotanical evidence for high frequencies of crop plants (26, 27). Plant microremains have also recently allowed recognition of palm (sago) starch consumption in tropical South China (28) and Borneo (23).

Where evidence for the presence of morphological domesticates is available alongside regional environmental modification, it appears that agriculture succeeds the establishment of domesticated crops. In early Neolithic Europe, archaeobotanical evidence for the presence of domesticated cereals in archaeological sites precedes palynological indicators of forest reduction and increases in arable pollen indicators (29). Early European and Anatolian weed floras and N¹⁵ isotope data from cereal grains indicate that these first crops were manured, suggesting intensively managed, small-scale fields, or grain “gardens” (30). The earliest preserved field systems for rice cultivation in China, ca. 6000 B.P., indicate small individual fields less than 2 m in diameter which allowed the careful management of soil and water conditions (31). As in Europe, regional deforestation in China proceeds gradually after this period (32). In the millet-dominated area of northern China, forest reduction occurred from 5000 B.P., millennia after domesticated millet production was widespread (33), whereas deforestation of the South Indian hills is evident around 3500 B.P., centuries after the first village-farming cultures (34).

Similar delays in agricultural systems are evident in the New World. In the Eastern Woodlands of North America, morphological changes document the domestication of several seed crops by 4500–4000 B.P. (35, 36), although a shift toward these crops over wild nuts only happened after 2,000 y ago (37). In the Balsas region of Mexico, starch and phytoliths indicate the exclusive processing of domesticated maize, without comparable finds of wild teosinte, at 8700 B.P., whereas lake core data in the region indicate landscape modification for slash-and- burn agriculture starting from 7600 B.P. (38, 39). In the Ñanchoc Valley (northwestern Peru), starch from human teeth indicates the consumption of a range of crops, including introduced domesticates by 8000 B.P.; this is some 2,000 y before evidence for irrigation ditches indicate agricultural landscape modification in the region (40). In the tropical lowlands of eastern South America, anthropogenic soils and raised fields occur millennia after the appearance of fossil remains of domesticated crops in the region (22, 25, 41). Thus agriculture itself as a system of major landscape modification was a convergent development that evolved after the establishment of cultivation and morphological domestication of crops.

Comparing Timing and Tempo of Domestication in Seed Crops

The domestication syndrome is likely to differ for various crop plants, according primarily to how they are reproduced (by seed or by cuttings) and according to which plant organ is the target of selection. The best-defined and -studied domestication syndrome is for grain crops, including cereals, pulses, and oilseeds (7, 9). Foremost are the traits selected by harvesting and a crop’s growing reliance on humans for seed dispersal, including the loss of natural seed dispersal mechanisms. Second, there are traits related to the more friable soil conditions within tilled fields, leading to the deeper burial of seeds. The increase in seed size seen in most crops is hypothesized to aid seedling establishment, including from deeper burial (1, 7, 9), and is the most widely documented change in archaeobotanical evidence. Another key change is the loss of germination inhibition, in which germination occurs shortly after planting; this is regarded as the key domestication trait of pseudocereals like Chenopodium (7, 15, 35) and many pulses (9). For some taxa this is visible in preserved seed coat structure.

Nonshattering is often taken as a sine qua non of domesticated seed crops, making these species dependent on humans for reproduction by planting (1, 18, 19). In cereals this difference can be documented by the preserved abscission scar on the base of spikelets or rachis segments. Domestication in terms of this trait took at least 2,000–2,500 y (Fig. 2). Grain size change is more gradual over the same period as the shift from shattering (wild-type) to nonshattering seed dispersal (Fig. 2). After the episode of domestication, grain size becomes variable, fluctuating both up and down, suggesting processes of varietal differentiation and local adaptation; however, by the time of diversification, directional selection of the domestication episode is complete. Nonshattering becomes fixed at ∼100% in wheat and barley, whereas percentages as low as 70% are returned from archaeological rice populations, due to the persistence of weedy rices as a major contaminant of fields. Fig. 3 summarizes the variation in domestication rates and inferred coefficients of selection across 15 taxa and 18 traits (Tables S1–S4).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab
• Download powerpoint

Fig. 2.

Evidence for protracted domestication episodes in Old World cereals, including proportion of nonshattering spikelet scars (Upper) and grain size indices (Lower).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab
• Download powerpoint

Fig. 3.

Rates of change in domestication traits across the collected dataset. (A) Graph comparing frequency of rates in terms of percentage change in trait per year. (B) Scatter of all haldane rate estimates, indicating trait/crop type. (C) Frequency of estimated selection coefficients in the dataset.

Evolutionary change in nonshattering is generally faster than grain size change, especially when measured in terms of haldanes (H). A haldane represents a change of one SD of a trait value per generation (11). For emmer wheat (Triticum dicoccum), the low estimate of H (Fig. 3) may be due to the relatively limited sample size available, as expanded datasets for Triticum monococcum and Hordeum vulgare have increased the estimates of rate somewhat over those made previously from a smaller dataset (11). Compared with reported phenotypic evolution rates in wild plant and animal studies that average around 0.03 H, our range of phenotypic evolution rates in domestication traits are generally similar. These rates of phenotypic change can be used to estimate the coefficient of selection, namely, the average increase per generation in gene(s) for a trait, which ranges from 0.0007 for nonshattering in T. diccocum to ∼0.1 in T. monococcum and H. vulgare.

Rates of phenotypic change for nonshattering were often one or two orders of magnitude greater than for grain size (Fig. 3), although this was still a protracted process. In the case of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum), domesticated in West Africa, chaff impressions in early Malian pottery indicate nonshattering types predominated by 4000 B.P., suggesting a preceding domestication episode of at least 1,000–2,000 y (10). In the case of maize (Zea mays mays), phytoliths indicative of nonshattering and absence of wild teosinte (Zea mays parviglumis) in the Rio Balsas region of Mexico at 8700 B.P. suggest that the domestication process and evolution of nonshattering occurred earlier (39). However, a sequence of evidence tracking the transition from nonshattering to shattering, or grain size changes, during this period is not yet available. For other cereals (various millets), archaeological evidence for nonshattering is similarly elusive. Remains of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) from sites in the eastern Sahara indicate the consumption of wild (shattering) forms from 10000 to 5500 B.P. (42, 43), whereas the first domesticated forms are only documented following the crop’s introduction to India after 4000 B.P. (44). This suggests that domestication took place in Africa between 6000 and 4000 B.P., but hard evidence for the process is lacking. Widespread use of cultivars suggests they had evolved by 8000–7500 B.P. for north Chinese millets (45, 46) and before 4500 B.P. for some Indian millets (44).

A more widely documented domestication trait in seed crops is increased seed size (2, 47). Most seeds increase by 20–60% in one or two dimensions, mainly thickness or breadth (Figs. S1 and S2 and Table S1). A 20% increase is reported for barnyard millet (Echinochloa crus-galli) domestication in northern Japan over 2,000–3,000 y (48), whereas the smallest change in the current dataset is the 19% increase in peas. At the upper end are reported thickness changes in some millets, including a 72% difference in grain thickness between modern wild and domesticated Eragrostis tef (49), and 76% in archaeological P. glaucum. A few taxa show much more dramatic increases on the order 100% or more, i.e., doubling seed dimensions, such as in Indian mungbean (Vigna radiata), Chinese soybean (Glycine max) (50), and North American Iva annua (51). The rate of change ranges between 0.0006 and 0.11 H. Evidence for einkorn wheat at early occupations on Cyprus suggests the rate of change in domestication traits was accelerated in an island context, perhaps due to genetic isolation from the wild population or bottleneck effects (52). Here einkorn grain size increased at 0.06 H as opposed to 0.006 H on the Eurasian mainland (52).

Cucurbit seeds appear to be closer to the lower end of size increases, with about 15% increase found with the domestication of Cucurbita pepo and recorded through the squash seeds of Guila Naquitz in southern Mexico 10000–8000 B.P. (15). In the case of Chinese melons, mean seed sizes increase by about 22% over 500 y, with a moderately fast 0.0073 H. Phytolith size in squash rinds also correlates with increasing fruit size (Fig. S3) showing a significant size increase in Ecuadorean assemblages (>40%) over the Early Holocene (53), but with a low H (1 × 10⁻⁵). A more rapid increase (1 × 10⁻⁴ H) is associated with an initial domestication that took place by 11000 B.P.

Seed size increase may not always be an indicator of domestication. In some starchy fruits, reduction of seeds correlates with increase in starch content, as was clearly the case in the development of domesticated bananas (Musa cvs.) (54). In some cases, regional selection trajectories have been divergent. For example, breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis) has been selected for seedless cultivars with larger fruits (consumed for edible pulp), as well as seeded cultivars in which seeds are eaten. The degree of seediness decreases eastwards and away from the New Guinea region (55).

Comparing Timing of Domestication in Vegecultural Crops

It has generally been thought that vegetative reproduction made the domestication of tuberous plants possible through piecemeal replication of the characteristics of parent clones followed by selection and multiplication of useful phenotypic variations arising in planted stock (e.g., larger and smooth-skinned tubers, or less toxic/bitter forms). Unlike domesticated seed crops, some vegetative crops are not dependent on human efforts to reproduce and spread (23). However, sexual reproduction cycles and cooption of volunteer wild seedlings provide an important source of genetic diversity and local adaptations in at least some tubers (56). Indeed, it is clear that domesticated forms have been genetically altered from their wild progenitors on the basis of differing functional traits, such as those relating to toxicity, as well as on evidence for genetic bottlenecks between cultivars and wild relatives (57). Although increase in tuber size may be expected to correlate with an increase in the size of individual parenchyma cells, archaeologically recovered tuber fragments tend to preserve few morphological attributes relevant to phenotypic change. However, some research suggests that microremains such as starch grains have increased in size with tuber domestication (14, 58) and banana phytoliths have increased in size between diploid and triploid cultivars (59). Notwithstanding, compared with seed crops, it is harder to document archaeologically phenotypic changes in crops that are vegetatively propagated, such as tubers and some fruits, e.g., banana, grape, and olive (60, 61).

In some cases, cultivation practices may induce phenotypic alteration without genotypic change. Larger tubers develop in yams replanted in loosened, prepared soil as opposed to harder unprepared soils (62, 63). Thus some tuber crops could be cultivated for long periods without undergoing morphological domestication. Recent work on SSR molecular markers of live germplasm of Ipomoea batatas (64) and Manihot esculenta (65) permit disentangling complex histories of domestication. The latter study provides support for the argument (25) that one of the two manioc macro varieties (sweet manioc, the lower starch yielder that is less resistant to pests and poor soils) was domesticated earlier than bitter manioc (which grows well on poor soils, is resistant to pests, and yields more starch). The sequence most likely reflects an initial selection of plants in dump heaps with subsequent cultivation and range expansion. Subsequently in Amazonia, detoxification and cultivation techniques were innovated and led to the relaxation of selective pressures against cyanogenic glucosides to the point where a more toxic, but high starch-yielder evolved (66). Recent research has identified traits that facilitate vegetative propagation of cropped manioc, such as pronounced parenchymatous swellings at the nodes leading to brittle stems that can be readily broken for replanting, are absent in wild relatives (67).

Although it is not possible yet to provide quantitative data on domestication rates for vegetatively reproduced crops, we can provide comparisons of some general trajectories. In both New Guinea and Central/South America, evidence for consumption of starchy plants has been found back to the start of the Holocene or into the Pleistocene, whereas pollen evidence indicates human-disturbed forests, often including intentional burning (22, 24, 27, 68). This indicates human management of the landscape, within which some plants could be encouraged and planted. Artificial cultivation mounds in New Guinea (26, 27) suggest cultivation of tubers by the Mid-Holocene (7000–6400 B.P.), whereas microfossils beyond the range of the wild species, as well as dedicated lithic tools for cultivation and processing of roots, suggest tuber cultivation in Central and South America by 7000 B.P. (22, 24). In New Guinea, agricultural dependence and intensification of production can be suggested from 5000 to 3500 B.P., with ditched fields, wooden spades, and probable sedentism (68). A similar timing is suggested for the introduction of rice and possible spread of banana in Southeast Asia (28, 69). In northern South America, sedentism associated with tuber crops and other cultivars (squashes, fruit trees, and maize) dates to the Mid-Holocene in different regions (70). These data suggest a shift from initial management of forest gaps and edges, where gap-colonizing species were exploited for food, to the creation of patches of food plants through planting. Vicariance induced by deliberate diffusion beyond the range of the wild species before the adoption of dedicated agricultural practices, along with the formalization of systematic plots where selection pressures and genetic isolation from wild populations increased, both played a role in the trajectories of domestication of vegecultural crops.

Trajectories to Agriculture: Parallelism and Convergence in Cultural Evolution

The morphological changes of domestication are only one aspect of documenting the origins of agriculture. A domestication episode can be regarded as providing a species-specific time scale against which evidence for cultivation and management practices can be charted to reveal the interplay of human action and domestication. Although the evolution of domestication traits tends to increase the efficiency of harvests and yields, it also requires adjustments in human activities. Some of these may be characterized as labor traps, such as the additional requirement of threshing and winnowing as nonshattering rose to dominance, or the need to add nutrients to soils as erect crop growth habits packed more plants into the same units of soil, or the relocation of plots following nutrient depletion of soils (2). Thus, over the course of domestication there would have been fluctuations toward efficiency alternating with increased labor demands, but with an overall direction toward increasing yields and intensification of cultivation activities.

Taken at a comparative global level, the long-term impact of agricultural origins has been to support denser human populations through intensification of land use (5), including sedentism and fostering a greater reliance on a limited range of domesticated food stuffs. Although this represents convergence at a global level, the different domestication processes that can be documented across crops suggest that we should also look for multiple cultural patterns of agricultural origins, for example, in terms of the mobility of past societies and nature of crop reproduction.

Pristine domestications of crops have often occurred within mobile societies, which might include either hunter–gatherers or noncultivating pastoralists. In the case of vegecultural origins, both in New Guinea and Central/America, sedentism dates back only 4,000–5,000 y, long after the earliest inferred cultivation in these regions. Similarly seed crop cultivation of maize in Mesoamerica precedes settled villages by ∼5,000 y. In northern China, settled village farmers of millets date from at least 6500 B.P., whereas millet exploitation occurred by 9500 B.P., with clear cultivation by 8000 B.P. (45, 71). Both maize and Chinese millet cultivation correlate with periods of climatic amelioration in the Early Holocene (39, 46). In the case of the Old World savannah millet domestications, mobile gatherer–pastoralists with domesticated ungulates entered the Sahel of western Africa and then cultivated millet, whereas in peninsular India seasonally mobile herder–hunters precede sedentism or crops (44). In these cases of Mid-Holocene grain domestication, there was climatic aridification shortly before evidence for cultivation, including desertification processes of the Sahara or savannah expansion in South India (10, 44). In eastern North America, cultivation began among seasonally mobile Late Archaic hunter–fisher–gatherers ca. 5000 B.P. (15, 35). Among the key factors suggested for domestication by mobile groups are risk avoidance and seasonal conflicts in resource availability, leading to cultivation to make such resources readily available when seasonally needed (44, 72) or to buffer risks in wild food availability (46, 73).

Although sedentism based on agricultural economies was to become universal, only in a few instances is there possible evidence for sedentary foragers involved in the initial cultivation of crops. In China’s Yangtze Valley, substantial settlements at ∼8000 B.P. indicate sedentism before morphological domestication of rice and alongside early cultivation (31, 32). In Southwest Asia, the Late Pleistocene Natufian culture is often regarded as sedentary or nearly so, by 13,500 y ago, and a precursor of the cultivating villages during the Pre-Pottery Neolithic from ca. 11500 B.P. (74). Although the extent of year-round sedentism at villages focused on farming can be queried (74), it is nevertheless the case that architecturally permanent sites became increasingly important for cultivation, storage, and consumption of early crops like wheats and barley. Early cultivation by the Jomon of Japan was in the context of sedentism (48). The adoption of crops in the Ñanchoc Valley of northwestern Peru after 9000 B.P. is associated with sedentism (76). In these cases, pressure on resources and the need to support growing, and sedentary, populations are often considered part of the explanation of the origins of cultivation (77).