Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology
Commentary

Assessing what is cultural about Asian Americans’ academic advantage

Min Zhou and Jennifer Lee
PNAS June 10, 2014 111 (23) 8321-8322; first published May 29, 2014; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1407309111
Min Zhou
aDivision of Sociology, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639798;
bDepartment of Sociology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ZhouMin@ntu.edu.sg
Jennifer Lee
cDepartment of Sociology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

See related content:

  • Explaining Asian Americans' academic advantage
    - May 05, 2014
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Scholars have long debated the reasons underlying Asian Americans’ exceptional educational outcomes. Psychologists emphasize individual cognitive ability and the effects of stereotypes on performance (1). Culturalists point to values, beliefs, norms, and behavioral patterns unique and intrinsic to ethnicity (2). Structuralists focus on socioeconomic status within and beyond the family, including a group’s position in a society’s status hierarchy (3, 4). Data limitations and quantitative modeling constraints, combined with contentious ethnic politics, have rendered social scientists at an intellectual stalemate. This standstill has consequences: The lack of a strong social science voice in the debate has lead pundits to liberally evoke culture to explain poor or exceptional group outcomes (5, 6); the simplistic framing of group culture has fanned fury, pitted groups against each other, and led Civil Rights activists to advocate for group interests to promote a political agenda. Meanwhile, the general public has remained deprived of knowledge generated from rigorous scientific research. However, Amy Hsin and Yu Xie propel the debate forward with their refreshing analyses and insight in their PNAS report, “Explaining Asian Americans’ academic advantage over whites” (7).

The Asian-White Achievement Gap

Based on nationally representative cohort longitudinal surveys, Hsin and Xie (7) use sophisticated statistical techniques to develop multilayer decomposition models that simultaneously test three competing hypotheses: psychological (individual cognitive ability), cultural (belief in academic effort), and structural (family socioeconomic background). The authors use Asian–white gaps in educational outcomes (rather than outcomes per se) as their dependent variable, and control for factors that differ across schools. Hsin and Xie find a persistent Asian–white gap in educational outcomes. They also find that the difference in academic effort, rather than in cognitive ability or socio-demographic characteristics, explains the Asian–white gap.

Hsin and Xie then press forward to address why Asian American students put more effort into their schoolwork than their white peers, pointing to the significance of the cultural belief that Asian immigrant parents hold about the positive relationship between effort and outcomes. The authors also estimate the costs of Asian American students’ academic achievement and effort and find a host of negative consequences: Asian Americans are significantly less likely than comparable whites to have positive feelings toward themselves, they spend less time socializing with friends, and they experience more conflict with both parents. Analyses disaggregating Asians into four main ethnic groups—East Asian, South Asian, Filipino, and Southeast Asian—and controlling for sex do not change the general patterns.

Hsin and Xie’s (7) analyses have yielded powerful and conclusive evidence to confirm that culture—as measured by increased effort—accounts for Asian Americans’ academic advantage. Hsin and Xie have put culture back on the map by proactively engaging in the debate about its role in explaining the Asian–white achievement gap. The authors define culture as a shared belief in the positive correlation between effort and outcomes, measure culture in terms of academic effort, and test competing hypotheses in a single empirical analysis. They clearly and convincingly find a cultural effect, which advances a classic sociological idea that cultural beliefs are associated with particular behaviors that constrain or enable particular outcomes (8⇓–10).

Unanswered Questions about Asian Americans’ Academic Advantage

Although they empirically show that Asian Americans have an academic advantage over whites, Hsin and Xie (7) are limited by the available data and are unable to investigate how Asian immigrant parents pass on the cultural belief about effort in a way that affects their children’s behaviors and outcomes. Moreover, Hsin and Xie can only use a proximate measure of academic effort: that is, teachers’ subjective ratings of students’ attentiveness, task persistence, and eagerness to learn. Teachers may be biased in their ratings of students, but even if we assume that there is no bias on the part of teachers, two questions still remain. First, how and why do Asian immigrant parents pass onto their children the cultural belief that increased effort leads to more positive outcomes? Second, given the high costs associated with effort and high achievement, how have Asian Americans managed to academically excel despite the overwhelming pressure they experience, especially in a racially stratified society?

Here is where our qualitative study can help answer these lingering questions. Based on face-to-face, in-depth interviews with adult children of Chinese and Vietnamese immigrants randomly drawn from the survey of Immigration and Intergenerational Mobility in Metropolitan Los Angeles, we focused on their lived experiences from their perspectives, what we call a “subject-centered approach” (11, 12). We examined the ways in which immigrant parents and their children framed success, as well as the resources they used to support and reinforce the frame. We found that the differences in the cultural frame and the resources used to support it help to explain why the children of some Asian immigrant groups get ahead, despite their socioeconomic disadvantage.

The Success Frame

Three main findings from our study are particularly relevant and effectively complement Hsin and Xie’s (7) research. First, the adult children of Chinese immigrants and Vietnamese refugees articulate a strict “success frame,” which entails getting straight As in high school, attaining a degree in a prestigious university, and securing a well-paying job in one of the four coveted professions: science, engineering, medicine, and law. This narrow success frame contrasts with broader success frames adopted by adult children of Mexican immigrants, as well as native-born blacks and whites. However, we caution that the success frame is not innate to Asian culture or being Asian, but rather is a product of being a child of Asian immigrants in the United States.

Believing that upward social mobility is possible in the United States, but fearing that their children will face racial discrimination because of their non-white status, Asian immigrant parents shepherd their children into the path that will best predict a successful professional outcome. Fields such as science, engineering, medicine, and law require exceptional educational achievement, credentials, and “hard skills” that may obviate or lessen potential discrimination from employers, coworkers, and clients. This requirement explains why Asian immigrant parents actively work to support the success frame and pass it onto their children. For example, even when they encourage music lessons for their children, Asian immigrant parents do so because they wish their children to be more well-rounded and, therefore, more competitive applicants to elite universities, rather than because they want to nurture their children’s musical talent, per se.

Second, Asian immigrant parents have access to tangible and intangible resources generated in the ethnic community that not only reinforce the success frame, but also help them access institutional resources in public schools. These ethnic resources are difficult to capture in quantitative data. For example, in our study we find that the Chinese and Vietnamese immigrant communities have developed an elaborate system of supplementary education—private afterschool services, such as tutoring, examination cram and drill classes, college prep courses, and enrichment programs, with a wide range of price tags—which the children of Chinese and Vietnamese immigrants of different socioeconomic backgrounds can afford. The Korean community has similarly developed an elaborate ethnic system of supplementary education in the United States (13, 14).

Most of our respondents reported that they had participated in these ethnic after-school or summer school programs. Tapping into tangible ethnic resources means that Asian American students put extra effort in their schoolwork outside of school, and this extra effort may affect students’ behavior in school and may also affect teachers’ ratings of them. In addition, participation in after-school programs exposes students to an ethnic environment in which they have access to other intangible ethnic resources, such as positive role models to show that the success frame is realistic and attainable. This approach explains how Asian immigrant parents pass on the belief of the importance of effort despite intense parent–child conflicts.

The Hyper-Selectivity of Asian Immigration

However, tangible and intangible educational resources are not equally available in immigrant or ethnic communities, and immigrant selectivity and hyperselectivity are critical here. Immigrant selectivity refers to the phenomenon in which those who immigrate to the United States are more highly educated than their counterparts who stay behind. Whereas most immigrant groups are highly selected in this regard, there is substantial variation in the degree of educational selectivity depending on the country of origin and the timing of migration from a particular country (15). Asian immigrants to the United States are highly selected from their countries of origin, which is not happenstance; US immigration policies afford an edge to applicants with high skills.

In addition, Asian immigrants are more highly educated than average Americans, despite the tremendous heterogeneity in their countries of origin. We refer to this dual selectivity as “hyperselectivity”: a unique set of group characteristics that helps immigrants selectively import cultural practices (such as the success frame and after-school academics) from their countries of origin, fine-tune them, and then recreate those that are most useful for social mobility in their host society. The importing of specific cultural practices and institutions underscores our point that culture is not essential or fixed but, rather, a dynamic resource that is shaped by immigrant selectivity and hyperselectivity.

Furthermore, our research helps to shed light on Hsin and Xie’s (7) finding about the lower subjective well-being of Asian American students. The cultural frame comes at a cost, and is a double-edged sword for the children of Asian immigrants. Because Chinese and Vietnamese Americans use high-achieving coethnics (rather than native-born whites or the average coethnic) as their reference group, those who do not meet its strict tenets feel like ethnic outliers or failures and, as a result, they distance themselves from coethnics and from their ethnic identities (11). This finding has broader implications for theories of assimilation; today’s non-white second generation do not turn to native-born whites as their reference group or their model for success.

Concluding Remarks

In closing, we would like to call attention to the unique ways in which qualitative data and mixed methods can help to inform the debate about culture and group outcomes. Although there is a well-established body of research driven by “hard” data, including Census and survey data, data that capture the diverse lived experiences of younger-generation Asian Americans are relatively scant. However, simply increasing the amount of data will not necessarily improve data quality, and simply combining quantitative and qualitative methodologies will not guarantee accurate representation (16). Furthermore, even the most sophisticated theoretical paradigms and ingenious empirical models will do little to advance knowledge if we fail to a priori critically assess our underlying assumptions about the ways in which culture may affect group outcomes. There is growing diversity among the Asian American population and their educational outcomes, signaling that the subfield will be ripe for new and informed research for years to come (17).

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: ZhouMin{at}ntu.edu.sg.
  • Author contributions: M.Z. and J.L. wrote the paper.

  • See companion article on page 8416.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

View Abstract

References

  1. ↵
    1. Inzlicht M,
    2. Schmader T
    (2012) Stereotype Threat: Theory, Process, and Application (Oxford Univ Press, New York).
  2. ↵
    1. Ogbu JU,
    2. Simons HD
    (1998) Voluntary and involuntary minorities: A cultural-ecological theory of school performance with some implications for education. Anthropol Educ Q 29(2):155–188.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. ↵
    1. Portes A,
    2. Hao L
    (2004) The schooling of children of immigrants: Contextual effects on the educational attainment of the second generation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(33):11920–11927.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Sue S,
    2. Okazaki S
    (1990) Asian American educational achievement: A phenomenon in search of an explanation. Am Psychol 45(8):913–920.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Brook D
    (2011) The Social Animal: The Hidden Sources of Love, Character, and Achievement (Random House, New York).
  6. ↵
    1. Chua A,
    2. Rebenfeld J
    (2014) The Triple Package: How Three Unlikely Traits Explain the Rise and Fall of Cultural Groups in America (Penguin, New York).
  7. ↵
    1. Hsin A,
    2. Xie Y
    (2014) Explaining Asian Americans’ academic advantage over whites. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:8416–8421.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Skrentny JD
    (2008) Culture and race/ethnicity: Bolder, deeper, and broader. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 619:59–77.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Small ML,
    2. Harding DJ,
    3. Lamont M
    (2010) Reconsidering culture and poverty. Ann Am Acad Poli Soc Sci 629(6):6–29.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    1. Swidler A
    (1986) Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. Am Sociol Rev 51(2):273–286.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. ↵
    1. Lee J,
    2. Zhou M
    (2014) The success frame and achievement paradox: The costs and consequences for Asian Americans. Race and Social Problems 6(1):38–55.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    1. Zhou M,
    2. Lee J,
    3. Vallejo JA,
    4. Tafoya-Estrada R,
    5. Xiong SY
    (2008) Success attained, deterred, and denied: Divergent pathways to social mobility among the new second generation in Los Angeles. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 620:37–61.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Byun SY,
    2. Park H
    (2012) The academic success of east Asian American youth: The role of shadow education. Sociol Educ 85(1):40–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. ↵
    1. Zhou M,
    2. Kim S
    (2006) Community forces, social capital, and educational achievement: The case of supplementary education in the Chinese and Korean immigrant communities. Harv Educ Rev 76(1):1–29.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Feliciano C
    (2005) Does selective migration matter? Explaining ethnic disparities in educational attainment among Immigrants’ children. Int Migr Rev 39(4):841–871.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. ↵
    1. Teranishi R,
    2. Lok L,
    3. Nguyen BMD
    (2013) iCount: A Data Quality Movement for Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders in Higher Education (National Commission on Asian American and Pacific Islander Research in Higher Education, New York).
  17. ↵
    1. Ramakrishnan K,
    2. Ahmad FZ
    (2014) Education. Center for American Progress. Available at www.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/AAPI-Education.pdf. Accessed May 1, 2014.
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Assessing what is cultural about Asian Americans’ academic advantage
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Asian Americans' academic advantage
Min Zhou, Jennifer Lee
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Jun 2014, 111 (23) 8321-8322; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1407309111

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Asian Americans' academic advantage
Min Zhou, Jennifer Lee
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Jun 2014, 111 (23) 8321-8322; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1407309111
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 111 (23)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Article Classifications

  • Social Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Jump to section

  • Article
    • The Asian-White Achievement Gap
    • Unanswered Questions about Asian Americans’ Academic Advantage
    • The Success Frame
    • The Hyper-Selectivity of Asian Immigration
    • Concluding Remarks
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Abstract depiction of a guitar and musical note
Science & Culture: At the nexus of music and medicine, some see disease treatments
Although the evidence is still limited, a growing body of research suggests music may have beneficial effects for diseases such as Parkinson’s.
Image credit: Shutterstock/agsandrew.
Scientist looking at an electronic tablet
Opinion: Standardizing gene product nomenclature—a call to action
Biomedical communities and journals need to standardize nomenclature of gene products to enhance accuracy in scientific and public communication.
Image credit: Shutterstock/greenbutterfly.
One red and one yellow modeled protein structures
Journal Club: Study reveals evolutionary origins of fold-switching protein
Shapeshifting designs could have wide-ranging pharmaceutical and biomedical applications in coming years.
Image credit: Acacia Dishman/Medical College of Wisconsin.
White and blue bird
Hazards of ozone pollution to birds
Amanda Rodewald, Ivan Rudik, and Catherine Kling talk about the hazards of ozone pollution to birds.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Goats standing in a pin
Transplantation of sperm-producing stem cells
CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing can improve the effectiveness of spermatogonial stem cell transplantation in mice and livestock, a study finds.
Image credit: Jon M. Oatley.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490