New Research In
Physical Sciences
Social Sciences
Featured Portals
Articles by Topic
Biological Sciences
Featured Portals
Articles by Topic
- Agricultural Sciences
- Anthropology
- Applied Biological Sciences
- Biochemistry
- Biophysics and Computational Biology
- Cell Biology
- Developmental Biology
- Ecology
- Environmental Sciences
- Evolution
- Genetics
- Immunology and Inflammation
- Medical Sciences
- Microbiology
- Neuroscience
- Pharmacology
- Physiology
- Plant Biology
- Population Biology
- Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
- Sustainability Science
- Systems Biology
Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics
Edited* by Bruce Alberts, University of California, San Francisco, CA, and approved April 15, 2014 (received for review October 8, 2013)
See related content:
This article has a reply. Please see:

Significance
The President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology has called for a 33% increase in the number of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) bachelor’s degrees completed per year and recommended adoption of empirically validated teaching practices as critical to achieving that goal. The studies analyzed here document that active learning leads to increases in examination performance that would raise average grades by a half a letter, and that failure rates under traditional lecturing increase by 55% over the rates observed under active learning. The analysis supports theory claiming that calls to increase the number of students receiving STEM degrees could be answered, at least in part, by abandoning traditional lecturing in favor of active learning.
Abstract
To test the hypothesis that lecturing maximizes learning and course performance, we metaanalyzed 225 studies that reported data on examination scores or failure rates when comparing student performance in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) courses under traditional lecturing versus active learning. The effect sizes indicate that on average, student performance on examinations and concept inventories increased by 0.47 SDs under active learning (n = 158 studies), and that the odds ratio for failing was 1.95 under traditional lecturing (n = 67 studies). These results indicate that average examination scores improved by about 6% in active learning sections, and that students in classes with traditional lecturing were 1.5 times more likely to fail than were students in classes with active learning. Heterogeneity analyses indicated that both results hold across the STEM disciplines, that active learning increases scores on concept inventories more than on course examinations, and that active learning appears effective across all class sizes—although the greatest effects are in small (n ≤ 50) classes. Trim and fill analyses and fail-safe n calculations suggest that the results are not due to publication bias. The results also appear robust to variation in the methodological rigor of the included studies, based on the quality of controls over student quality and instructor identity. This is the largest and most comprehensive metaanalysis of undergraduate STEM education published to date. The results raise questions about the continued use of traditional lecturing as a control in research studies, and support active learning as the preferred, empirically validated teaching practice in regular classrooms.
Footnotes
- ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: srf991{at}u.washington.edu.
Author contributions: S.F. and M.P.W. designed research; S.F., M.M., M.K.S., N.O., H.J., and M.P.W. performed research; S.F. and S.L.E. analyzed data; and S.F., S.L.E., M.M., M.K.S., N.O., H.J., and M.P.W. wrote the paper.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
↵*This Direct Submission article had a prearranged editor.
See Commentary on page 8319.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1319030111/-/DCSupplemental.
Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.
Citation Manager Formats
Sign up for Article Alerts
Jump to section
You May Also be Interested in
More Articles of This Classification
Social Sciences
Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
Related Content
Cited by...
- Student Attitudes toward Active Learning vs. Lecture in Cell Biology Instruction
- Evaluating the extent of a large-scale transformation in gateway science courses
- Enriching Undergraduate Entomology Coursework through the Integration of Evolutionary Developmental Biology
- Orientation in Pill Bugs: An Interdisciplinary Activity to Engage Students in Concepts of Biology, Physics & Circular Statistics
- Enhancing Student Learning on Emerging Infectious Diseases: An Ebola Exemplar
- BioBits™ Explorer: A modular synthetic biology education kit
- Curricula Influence College Student Knowledge and Attitudes Regarding Invasive Species
- Focused educational intervention improves but may not sustain knowledge regarding falls management
- Pursuing the Promise of Case Studies for Sustainability and Environmental Education: Converging Initiatives
- Anatomy of STEM teaching in North American universities
- Improving Student Learning Through an Interdisciplinary Case Study: Exploring Eutrophication in Lake Erie
- Graduate Biomedical Science Education Needs a New Philosophy
- Interest in STEM is contagious for students in biology, chemistry, and physics classes
- Classroom sound can be used to classify teaching practices in college science courses
- Improving undergraduate STEM education: The efficacy of discipline-based professional development
- Modeling Evolution in the Classroom: An Interactive LEGO Simulation
- Should Lecture Recordings Be Mandated in Dental Schools? Two Viewpoints: Viewpoint 1: Lecture Recordings Should Be Mandatory in U.S. Dental Schools and Viewpoint 2: Lecture Recordings Should Not Be Mandatory in U.S. Dental Schools
- Toward an understanding of "teaching in the making": Explaining instructional decision making by analyzing a geology instructors use of metaphors
- Wastewater Treatment Provides for Authentic Inquiry-Based Experiences in the Lab and Beyond
- Ten Tweaks That Can Improve Your Teaching
- On the nature of teaching and the next generation of plant scientists
- Teaching Genetics: Past, Present, and Future
- Vision & Change: Why It Matters
- Improving Genomic Literacy Among Cardiovascular Practitioners via a Flipped-Classroom Workshop at a National Meeting
- Learning and Doing: An Interview with Bill Wood
- Analyzing the Vocabulary Demands of Introductory College Textbooks
- Evaluating Promising Practices in Undergraduate STEM Lecture Courses
- Replication Rhumba & Translation Tango: Active Learning Exercises for Introductory Biology
- Assessing faculty professional development in STEM higher education: Sustainability of outcomes
- Exploring Models in the Biology Classroom
- Challenge faculty to transform STEM learning
- Social Media in the Dental School Environment, Part B: Curricular Considerations
- We must teach more effectively: here are four ways to get started
- Teaching quantitative biology: goals, assessments, and resources
- Limitations in experimental design mean that the jury is still out on lecturing
- Reply to Hora: Meta-analytic techniques are designed to accommodate variation in implementation
- Large-scale comparison of science teaching methods sends clear message
See related content: