Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
Research Article

Next-generation sequencing identifies rare variants associated with Noonan syndrome

Peng-Chieh Chen, Jiani Yin, Hui-Wen Yu, Tao Yuan, Minerva Fernandez, Christina K. Yung, Quang M. Trinh, Vanya D. Peltekova, Jeffrey G. Reid, Erica Tworog-Dube, Margaret B. Morgan, Donna M. Muzny, Lincoln Stein, John D. McPherson, Amy E. Roberts, Richard A. Gibbs, Benjamin G. Neel, and Raju Kucherlapati
  1. aDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115;
  2. bDepartment of Medicine, Division of Genetics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02115;
  3. cInstitute of Clinical Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70457, Taiwan;
  4. dPrincess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, and Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 1L7;
  5. eOntario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 0A3;
  6. fHuman Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030; and
  7. gDepartment of Cardiology and Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital Boston, Boston, MA 02115

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS August 5, 2014 111 (31) 11473-11478; first published July 21, 2014; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1324128111
Peng-Chieh Chen
aDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115;
bDepartment of Medicine, Division of Genetics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02115;
cInstitute of Clinical Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70457, Taiwan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jiani Yin
dPrincess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, and Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 1L7;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hui-Wen Yu
cInstitute of Clinical Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70457, Taiwan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tao Yuan
bDepartment of Medicine, Division of Genetics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02115;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Minerva Fernandez
dPrincess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, and Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 1L7;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christina K. Yung
eOntario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 0A3;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Quang M. Trinh
eOntario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 0A3;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vanya D. Peltekova
eOntario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 0A3;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey G. Reid
fHuman Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erica Tworog-Dube
bDepartment of Medicine, Division of Genetics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02115;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Margaret B. Morgan
fHuman Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Donna M. Muzny
fHuman Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lincoln Stein
eOntario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 0A3;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John D. McPherson
eOntario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 0A3;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amy E. Roberts
gDepartment of Cardiology and Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital Boston, Boston, MA 02115
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard A. Gibbs
fHuman Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Benjamin G. Neel
dPrincess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network, and Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5G 1L7;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: bneel@uhnresearch.ca rkucherlapati@partners.org
Raju Kucherlapati
aDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115;
bDepartment of Medicine, Division of Genetics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02115;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: bneel@uhnresearch.ca rkucherlapati@partners.org
  1. Edited by J. G. Seidman, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, and approved June 12, 2014 (received for review January 16, 2014)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Significance

Noonan syndrome (NS) is one of several RASopathies, which are developmental disorders caused by mutations in genes encoding RAS-ERK pathway components. The cause of 20–30% of NS cases remains unknown, and distinguishing NS from other RASopathies and related disorders can be difficult. We used next-generation sequencing (NGS) to identify causative or candidate genes for 13 of 27 NS patients lacking known NS-associated mutations. Other patients harbor single variants in potential RAS-ERK pathway genes, suggesting rare private variants or other genetic mechanisms of NS pathogenesis. We also found mutations in causative genes for other developmental syndromes, which together with clinical reevaluation, prompted revision of the diagnosis. NGS can aid in the challenging diagnosis of young patients with developmental syndromes.

Abstract

Noonan syndrome (NS) is a relatively common genetic disorder, characterized by typical facies, short stature, developmental delay, and cardiac abnormalities. Known causative genes account for 70–80% of clinically diagnosed NS patients, but the genetic basis for the remaining 20–30% of cases is unknown. We performed next-generation sequencing on germ-line DNA from 27 NS patients lacking a mutation in the known NS genes. We identified gain-of-function alleles in Ras-like without CAAX 1 (RIT1) and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1 (MAP2K1) and previously unseen loss-of-function variants in RAS p21 protein activator 2 (RASA2) that are likely to cause NS in these patients. Expression of the mutant RASA2, MAP2K1, or RIT1 alleles in heterologous cells increased RAS-ERK pathway activation, supporting a causative role in NS pathogenesis. Two patients had more than one disease-associated variant. Moreover, the diagnosis of an individual initially thought to have NS was revised to neurofibromatosis type 1 based on an NF1 nonsense mutation detected in this patient. Another patient harbored a missense mutation in NF1 that resulted in decreased protein stability and impaired ability to suppress RAS-ERK activation; however, this patient continues to exhibit a NS-like phenotype. In addition, a nonsense mutation in RPS6KA3 was found in one patient initially diagnosed with NS whose diagnosis was later revised to Coffin–Lowry syndrome. Finally, we identified other potential candidates for new NS genes, as well as potential carrier alleles for unrelated syndromes. Taken together, our data suggest that next-generation sequencing can provide a useful adjunct to RASopathy diagnosis and emphasize that the standard clinical categories for RASopathies might not be adequate to describe all patients.

  • human genetics
  • developmental diseases
  • whole exome sequencing
  • PTPN11
  • RAS

Germ-line mutations in genes encoding RAS-ERK signaling pathway components cause a set of related, autosomal dominant developmental disorders, termed “RASopathies” (1⇓–3), which include Noonan syndrome (NS), Noonan syndrome with multiple lentigenes (NS-ML; formerly known as LEOPARD syndrome), cardio-facio-cutaneous syndrome (CFCS), Costello syndrome (CS), and neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1). RASopathy patients typically display short stature, facial dysmorphia, cardiac defects, developmental delay, and other variably penetrant features. Some (e.g., NS, CS) RASopathies are associated with increased cancer predisposition, but the associated malignancies are distinct. The shared syndromic features of the RASopathies probably reflect ERK hyperactivation, although for NS-ML, at least some phenotypes result from excessive AKT-mTOR activity (4, 5). Inter- and intrasyndromic differences are probably due to the distinct effects of specific mutations, modifier alleles, and/or complexities in feedback regulatory pathways in various cell types. Delineating the genetics and biochemistry of RASopathies should shed light on normal human development and disease.

NS, the most common RASopathy, occurs in familial and sporadic forms and is characterized by typical facies, short stature, variable developmental delay, cognitive defects, and cardiac abnormalities. Webbed neck, pectus abnormalities, coagulation defects, and cryptorchidism also are common (1). The heart defects, primarily pulmonary valve stenosis and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (affecting ∼50% and 20–30% of individuals, respectively), usually are mutually exclusive and represent the primary cause of morbidity and mortality in NS patients (6). After the discovery of PTPN11 mutations as the most common cause of NS (50%), SOS1 (10–15%), KRAS (∼2%), NRAS (<1%), SHOC2 (<1%), CBL (<1%), and RAF1 (5–10%) were identified as additional genes for NS or NS-like disorders (7⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓–16). Together, these genes account for ∼80% of clinically diagnosed NS patients.

Identifying the remaining NS genes is important for accurate diagnosis, patient management, and delineating genotype/phenotype relationships. We used next-generation sequencing (NGS) to analyze germ-line DNA in a cohort of NS patients who had been evaluated by a single clinician and lacked mutations in the known NS genes. Here we report the identification of additional candidate genes that, when mutated, are likely to cause NS.

Results and Discussion

Previously Unidentified NS Genes.

We identified a cohort of 27 NS patients without a known NS gene mutation. Whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed on DNA from 25 patients; the other two samples were analyzed by whole genome sequencing (WGS; see SI Materials and Methods for details). The average coverage of each base pair in the coding regions of WES was 55-fold, and the average coverage for WGS was 22-fold (Fig. S1). Single nucleotide variants (SNVs) were detected and filtered for novel, missense, and nonsense variants. On average, there were 121 novel nonsynonymous coding SNVs per individual analyzed by WES (Table S1).

Because all known NS mutations affect RAS-ERK pathway components, we hypothesized that the remaining NS genes were likely to affect this pathway. We compared variants identified by WES and WGS against a database containing genes known to be involved in the RAS-ERK pathway (Table S2) and/or that encode proteins belonging to a functional interaction network with RAS-ERK pathway components (Materials and Methods and Fig. S2). This filtering strategy helped us to identify genes with novel variants in multiple individuals with NS, including RASA2, RIT1, and NF1, as well as genes with variants in a single individual, including MAP2K1, MAP3K8, and SPRY1 (Table S3).

Variants in Genes Associated with Other Syndromes.

Distinguishing RASopathies from other developmental disorders with overlapping symptoms is a challenge, especially in young patients, because differentiating features can manifest later in life. While analyzing our cohort of patients diagnosed clinically with NS, we discovered variants associated with distinct syndromes, including other RASopathies and unrelated disorders.

NF1.

Two patients (NS48 and NS166) had novel NF1 mutations. Patient NS48 was first examined at the age of 18 mo. Although the initial clinical diagnosis was ambiguous, NS was considered a possibility based on pectus excavatum and consistent facial features. WES detected a nonsense mutation (p.1869*) in exon 38. After identifying this mutation, we learned that reexamination of the patient at the age of 22 mo revealed café au lait macules and axillary freckling characteristic of NF-1, and his diagnosis had been revised to neurofibromatosis-NS [NFNS; Mendelian Inheritance in Man (MIM) MIM 601321] (17).

Patient NS166 had a missense variant (p.L1361R) in exon 30 (Table S3, Fig. 1A, and Fig. S3A). NF1 encodes neurofibromin, a RAS-GTPase-activating protein (RAS-GAP). Although most causative NF1 point mutations result in premature translation termination (18), some disease-associated missense mutations encode unstable NF1 proteins without affecting NF1 mRNA levels (19), and others impair RAS-GAP activity (20⇓–22). The leucine at position 1361 of NF1 is located in the GAP-related domain (NF1-GRD) and is highly conserved (Fig. 1B and Fig. S3 B and C). The nonconservative amino acid substitution (p.L1361R) in patient NS166 is considered highly likely to be damaging [multivariate analysis of protein polymorphism (MAPP) P = 1.8 × 10−5]. To assess the biochemical effects of this mutation, we compared the effects of a v-myc avian myelocytomatosis viral oncogene homolog (MYC) epitope-tagged, WT NF1-GRD construct (amino acids 1187–1574) to MYC-NF1-GRD bearing the p.L1361R mutation. Transient transfection of each construct into HEK293T cells resulted in similar levels of NF1-GRD mRNA (Fig. 1C), but compared with WT NF1-GRD, the level of the mutant NF1-GRD protein was markedly decreased (Fig. 1D). These results suggest that the p.L1361R mutation decreases protein stability, as seen with other NF1 missense mutations (19). Accordingly, the mutant NF1-GRD construct was defective in suppressing basal and epidermal growth factor (EGF)-evoked ERK activation, as assessed by immunoblotting with anti–phosphorylated-ERK (p-ERK) antibodies (Fig. 1D).

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

NS-associated NF1 variants are loss-of-function alleles. (A) Variants found in NS patients: RAS-GAP, RAS-GTPase activating protein-related; SEC, Sec14p-like lipid-binding domain. (B) NS-associated residue (pink) maps to RAS-GAP domain. RAS binding sites are in yellow. (C) WT and mutant NF1-GRD constructs express similar mRNA levels following transient transfection. Real-time qPCRs were performed using the indicated primers (arrows). (D) NS-associated NF1 variant encodes unstable protein. HEK293T cells were cotransfected with expression constructs for HA-ERK1 and WT NF1-GRD or NF1-GRDL1361R, starved, and restimulated with EGF. Lysates were immunoblotted, as indicated. Note decreased level of the mutant and its inability to inhibit EGF-evoked ERK activation. Triangles show HA-ERK1. A representative result from three biological replicates is shown.

Like NS48, NS166 only showed NS features at the time of enrollment into our study at the age of 23 (Table S3). She is now 27 y old and has a single café au lait macule, no inguinal or axillary freckling, no neurofibromas, no Lisch nodules, and no other classic features of NF-1. Such features would have been expected to appear by age 10, and thus NS166 does not meet the clinical diagnostic criteria for NF-1, despite her NF1 mutation.

Previous studies identified patients with features of NS and NF1; subsequent sequence analyses indicated that such patients almost always have an NF1 mutation (23). NS166 appears to fall into this category, although notably, this patient displayed no obvious NF-1–specific symptoms, as has also been reported recently for another individual (24). The presence of the NF1 mutation suggests that she should be monitored for the potential long-term complications of NF-1 rather than NS. Also, because of the frequency with which we identified NF1 mutations in this cohort, it might be advisable to add NF1 to RASopathy gene panels in clinical diagnostic laboratories.

RPS6KA3.

We detected a nonsense mutation in RPS6KA3 in one individual (NS24; Table S3 and Fig. S4). Mutations in RPS6KA3, encoding RSK2, cause Coffin–Lowry syndrome (CLS), a very rare X-linked dominant genetic disorder (estimated incidence: 1 in 50,000–100,000) that features severe psychomotor retardation, facial and digital dysmorphism, progressive skeletal deformation, and cardiac defects (25). NS24 was diagnosed with NS when enrolled in our cohort at age 1 y due to typical facies, short stature, congenital heart defect, and developmental delay, but his facial features later evolved. CLS was suspected at age 9 y and was confirmed by RPS6KA3 sequencing.

Probable Causative Variants Associated with NS Patients.

MEK1 gain-of-function mutation.

We detected a mutation (p.D67N) in MAP2K1, which encodes MEK1, in patient NS53 (Table S3, Fig. 2A, and Fig. S5). This mutation was reported previously in one CFCS case and two NS cases, but its biochemical activity had not been well characterized (26). Expression of MEK1D67N caused constitutive ERK activation in transiently transfected human embryonic kidney 293T (HEK293T) cells; under the same conditions, WT MEK1 had little effect (Fig. 2B). These data identify MAP2K1D67N as the causative allele in this patient.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

NS-associated MAP2K1 variant is gain-of-function allele. (A) Position of MAP2K1 variant: ED, ERK docking; NE, nuclear export; NR, negative regulation; PKc, protein kinase catalytic; PR, proline-rich domains. (B) Increased activity of variant. HA-ERK1 and FL-tagged WT MEK1 or NS-associated MEK1D67N were transiently cotransfected into HEK293T cells. Transfected cells were starved and restimulated with EGF as indicated, and cell lysates were subjected to immunoblotting. Note that the MEK1 variant evokes constitutive ERK activation. Triangles indicate HA-ERK1. A representative result from three biological replicates is shown.

RIT1 gain-of-function mutations.

We identified five individuals (NS03, NS36, NS78, NS87, and NS92) who had missense mutations in RIT1 (p.A57G, p.A77P, p.F82V, and p.G95A) and confirmed them by Sanger sequencing (Fig. 3A and Fig. S6A). RIT1 belongs to the RAS superfamily of small GTPases, and is >50% identical to RAS. Previous studies showed that an activated mutant of RIT1 (p.Q79L) can increase p38 MAPK and/or ERK activation in a cell-specific manner (27). The NS-associated mutations localize to the G2 domain (A57), G3 domain (A77), and switch II region (F82 and G95), which are conserved across vertebrates (Fig. 3A and Fig. S6B). Although the p.A57G mutant is not predicted to be damaging (MAPP P = 0.508), the other three alleles (p.A77P, p.F82V, and p.G95A) are expected to significantly affect protein function (MAPP P = 1.066 × 10−4, 0.002, and 0.009, respectively).

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

NS-associated RIT1 mutants activate RAS-ERK pathway. (A) Positions of variants are shown. Like all RAS family members, RIT1 contains five conserved functional domains: phosphate binding (G1 and G3), GTP binding and hydrolysis (G4 and G5), and effector protein binding (G2). Switch II indicates region homologous to switch II domain in RAS. (B) Representative immunoblots of lysates from cell lines expressing FL-tagged WT RIT1 or RIT variants, which were either nonsynchronized (NS) or starved (0) and then restimulated with EGF as indicated, lysed, and immunoblotted. Note increased basal and/or stimulated ERK1/2 phosphorylation in RIT1 mutant (AG, AP, FV, and GA) compared with WT RIT1-expressing cells. Lysates from cells expressing dominant-negative RIT1 (SN) or known activating mutant (QL) are also shown. Representative result from three independent biological replicates. (C) Representative immunoblots of lysates from cell lines expressing FL-tagged WT RIT1 or RIT variants, treated with cycloheximide, and then harvested, as indicated. Lysates from 1.5 × 105 (AG, AP, FV, and QL) or 3 × 105 (WT and SN) cell equivalents were immunoblotted with anti-FLAG antibodies. Note the increased stability of RIT1 mutants compared with WT or SN RIT. Also see Fig. S7.

To assess their effects on signaling, we recombined Flagged tagged (FL-) versions of each variant, as well as known activated (Q79L) and impaired (S35N) RIT1 mutants (27), into Flp-In T-REx 293 cells. This cell system enables tetracycline-inducible expression of constructs integrated into the same locus. Exogenous FL-RIT1 expression was induced for 24 h, after which we assessed ERK and p38 activation in unsynchronized cells (NS), in starved cells (0), or in starved cells restimulated with EGF for various times, using immunoblotting with appropriate phospho-specific antibodies. All of the mutant-expressing cells showed enhanced p-ERK levels (compared with WT RIT1-expressing cells) under unsynchronized conditions (Fig. 3B). EGF-induced ERK activation also was enhanced and/or sustained in cells expressing three (A57G, A77P, and F82V) of the mutants (Fig. 3B). RIT1G95A-expressing cells did not show consistent EGF-induced ERK hyperactivation (Fig. 3B), nor was p38 activity affected consistently by any of the RIT1 mutants (Fig. S6C). Notably, expression of RIT1S35N, a presumptive dominant negative mutant analogous to RASN17 (27), did not impair basal or EGF-induced ERK activation. These data suggest that RIT1 does not play a major role in normal RAS-ERK pathway activation, at least in Flp-In T-REx293 cells; i.e., the NS-associated mutants act as neomorphs. We also observed increased levels of most of the RIT1 mutants (except p.G95A) compared with WT RIT1 (Fig. 3B). However, cycloheximide experiments indicated that the half-lives of two (p.A77P and p.F82V) of the NS-associated RIT1 mutant proteins, as well as that of the known activated mutant p.Q79L, were prolonged, suggesting a potential mechanism for their increased ability to promote ERK activation (Fig. 3C and Fig. S7). By contrast, the half-life of p.A57G was only minimally prolonged, despite its increased steady-state levels. Taken together, our data support the conclusion that RIT1 is a causative gene for NS.

While this manuscript was in preparation, Aoki et al. reported RIT1 mutations in NS (28). Our results clearly validate RIT1 as a causative gene for NS. In their study, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), which affects only ∼20% of NS patients overall, was seen in 70% of cases with a RIT1 mutation. We did not find such a correlation, perhaps because our cohort was relatively small. Alternatively, increased HCM incidence might correlate with RIT1 mutations only in Asian NS patients; notably, strain background can strongly affect the penetrance of NS phenotypes in mouse models (29). Aoki et al. also did not see consistent hyperactivation of ERK in heterologous cells expressing NS-associated RIT1 mutants. This discrepancy with our results could reflect the use of different cell systems; specifically, we used stable cell lines that inducibly express mutant alleles at near-physiological levels, which could reveal subtle signs of RAS-ERK pathway activation that are missed in transient transfection studies. Moreover, we found that, compared with WT RIT1, some gain-of-function RIT1 proteins exhibit enhanced stability (Fig. 3D); hence, normalizing the effects of RIT1 variants to protein expression can underestimate their biological effects.

The germ-line RIT1 alleles that we identified also have been reported as somatic mutations in cancer. The p.A77P variant has been detected in lung adenocarcinoma (COSMIC), and p.F82V was recently identified in leukemia (30, 31). The latter finding is of substantial interest, given the association between NS and juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML) (1). Although the two patients carrying RIT1 p.A77P and p.F82V in our study have no evidence of cancer, given the above associations, it will be important to follow them closely for potential malignancies.

RASA2 loss-of-function variants.

Three patients (NS06, NS16, and NS78) had novel missense variants, affecting two residues in RASA2 (Fig. 4A and Fig. S8A), the mammalian RAS-GAP family member with highest similarity to Drosophila Gap1 (32). The NS-associated alterations (p.Y326C, p.326N, and p.R511C) alter highly conserved amino acids in the GAP domain of RASA2, which itself is highly conserved (Fig. S8 B and C). Modeling the RASA2 mutants on the structure of p120GAP predicts that R511 is a direct contact site for RAS (Fig. 4B) (33), and the NS-associated mutations are expected to damage RASA2 function (MAPP P = 2.12 × 10−5, 9.42 × 10−5, and 5.39 × 10−6, respectively).

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

NS-associated RASA2 variants are loss-of-function alleles. (A) Positions of variants: C2A, C2 domain first repeat; C2B, C2 domain second repeat; RAS-GAP, RAS-GTPase activating protein; PH, Pleckstrin homology-like; BTK, Bruton’s tyrosine kinase cysteine-rich motif. (B) NS-associated residues (pink) map to RAS-GAP domain. Note that R511 is a putative RAS binding site (yellow). (C) RASA2 depletion enhances ERK1/2 activation. HEK293T cells transfected with either of two siRNAs for 48 h were lysed and immunoblotted. Note that increased ERK1/2 phosphorylation in RASA2-depleted cells correlates inversely with RASA2 level, with ∼50% reduction in RASA2 increasing ERK activation. (D) NS-associated RASA2 variants have defective GAP activity. Activated RAS levels in HEK293T cells transiently transfected with MYC-tagged WT RASA2 or NS-associated RASA2 variant (YC, YN, and RC) constructs were measured by RAF-RBD binding. Note that WT RASA2 suppresses, whereas NS-associated RASA2 variants enhance, RAS activation compared with controls. (E) Cell lines expressing Flag-tagged WT RASA2 or the indicated RASA2 variants (YC, YN, and RC) were starved and then restimulated with EGF. Lysates were immunoblotted, as indicated. A representative result from three biological replicates is shown.

We tested the role of RASA2 in RAS-ERK pathway regulation by knockdown experiments. Decreasing RASA2 levels in HEK293T cells with either of two siRNAs increased p-ERK levels, and the extent of ERK activation was inversely related to the residual level of RASA2 (Fig. 4C). Notably, lowering RASA2 levels by only ∼50% (si-2), as would be expected in a NS patient with a heterozygous inactivating RASA2 mutation, significantly increased p-ERK levels in EGF-stimulated cells (Fig. 4C). Next, we tested the impact of the NS-related RASA2 variants on GAP activity. HEK293T cells transiently transfected with a MYC-RASA2 expression construct showed barely detectable RAS-GTP, as monitored by RAF-RBD binding (Fig. 4D). By contrast, expression of the RASA2 variants not only failed to decrease RAS activity, but increased RAF-RBD binding compared with control vector (V)-transfected cells (Fig. 4D). In Flp-In T-REx 293 cells, WT RASA2 suppressed EGF-induced ERK activation compared with parental cells. By contrast, neither RASA2Y326C nor RASA2Y326N suppressed ERK activation (Fig. 4E), whereas RASA2R551C expression actually enhanced p-ERK levels, suggesting that this variant has dominant negative effects (Fig. 4E).

Parental DNA was not available for the patients bearing RASA2 variants. Moreover, given that NS is an autosomal dominant disease with incomplete penetrance, parental DNA results might not be dispositive. Nevertheless, our functional data nominate RASA2 as a new causative gene for NS. All of our patients are heterozygous for their RASA2 allele, suggesting haploinsufficiency, a previously unreported mechanism of NS pathogenesis. However, one RASA2 variant, p.R511C, appears to have dominant negative effects. The physiological role of RASA2 remains largely unknown, although our results implicate it in EGF-induced RAS-ERK activation in some cell types. Accordingly, EGF induces rapid, PI3 kinase-dependent recruitment of RASA2 from the cytosol to the plasma membrane in rat pheochromocytoma cells (34). Notably, 54 missense and nonsense mutations [compared with 17 synonymous mutations, as listed on the Catalogue Of Somatic Mutations In Cancer (COSMIC) database (http://cancer.sanger.ac.uk/cancergenome/projects/cosmic/)] in RASA2 have been identified in various malignancies, including cervical, colorectal, lung, and endometrial cancer (overall incidence, 0.65%). These data suggest that RASA2 might be a tumor suppressor gene and suggest that NS patients carrying RASA2 mutations also should be monitored for cancer.

Other Potential NS Candidate Genes.

SPRY1 loss-of-function mutation.

We identified a nonsense allele (pE79*) of SPRY1 in NS17 (Table S3 and Fig. S4). SPRY1 is a negative regulator of the RAS-ERK pathway, which reportedly binds to SHP2 (encoded by PTPN11) and RAF1 through its cysteine-rich domain (CRD) and inhibits ERK activation via an as yet unclear mechanism (35). The nonsense variant encodes a truncated version of SPRY1 that retains its Casitas B-lineage lymphoma (CBL) tyrosine kinase-binding (TKB) motif but lacks the serine-rich domain and CRD; hence, the predicted SPRY1 truncation in NS17 might be functionally defective. Spry1−/− mice have kidney defects and decreased viability, but no features characteristic of NS were reported. Spry1+/− mice reportedly are normal (36), although NS phenotypes in the mouse could be subtle and difficult to detect. Notably, NS17 has a healthy heart, normal height, and only very mild facial dysmorphia and learning problems, which might be caused by the SPRY1 pE79* variant. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to clarify the potential pathogenic role of the truncated SPRY1.

MAP3K8.

We detected one missense MAP3K8 variant, encoding p.L128V, in NS49 (Table S3 and Fig. S4). MAP3K8 (a.k.a. TPL2, COT) is an oncogene encoding a MAP kinase kinase kinase (MEKK) that can phosphorylate and activate MEK (37). An activating MAP3K8 allele might be expected to cause NS-like phenotypes. However, the NS49 variant is conservative and occurs in a region of unknown function. When we expressed WT or mutant MAP3K8 in Flp-In T-REx 293 cells, each constitutively activated ERK (Fig. S9). Although MAP3K8 remains an attractive candidate NS gene for this patient, further analysis will be required to establish its pathogenic significance.

We also identified more than one variant in other genes with a potential relationship to the RAS-ERK pathway in 14 NS individuals (Table S4). The pathologic significance of these variants awaits further, more detailed, biochemical and biological analysis.

Compound Mutations in NS Individuals.

We found that all 27 patients have variants in more than one gene classified as being involved in the RAS-ERK pathway. In most cases, we think it likely that their symptoms are caused by only one of these variants. However, in two cases, we suspect that both alleles contribute to their clinical features.

Patient NS78 had RIT1 p.F82V and RASA2 p.Y326C alleles (Table S3). As discussed above, both of these variants cause increased ERK activation in transfected heterologous cells. Co-occurring mutations in NS-causing genes have been reported in a few patients with NS (38⇓–40). Additive or modifying effects were observed in a NS patient carrying SHOC2 and PTPN11 mutations and in another individual harboring PTPN11 and KRAS mutations. By contrast, no atypical phenotypes were observed in a patient with PTPN11 and SOS1 mutations. NS78 has the typical facial dysmorphia seen in NS, as well as short stature, developmental delay, atrial septal defect, and pulmonary valve stenosis. Patients carrying single variant alleles in RASA2 or RIT1 showed typical facial, developmental and cardiac phenotypes (Fig. S10 and Table S3). NS78 also shows defects that occur infrequently in NS, such as branch pulmonary artery stenosis and a dilated main pulmonary artery (Table S3). It is possible that the atypical cardiac phenotypes in NS78 result from the combined effects of the RIT1 and RASA2 variants. However, because of the small size of our cohort, we could not assign genotype-phenotype associations in patients with RIT1 or RASA2 variants. Analysis of a larger cohort will be necessary to clarify the distinct roles of RIT1 or RASA2 in NS pathogenesis.

Patient NS87 had RIT1 p.G95A and a novel TGFB2 p.A251S allele (Table S3). TGFB2 mutations cause Marfan syndrome-associated familial thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections (TAADs) (41, 42). Interestingly, NS87 had cardiac abnormalities, including atrial fibrillation and pulmonary artery aneurysms, which are not typical of NS (Table S3). Whether the variants in TGFB2 or RIT1—or both—contribute to these defects is unclear. On detection of the variant TGFB2 allele, we attempted to contact the participant only to learn she had passed away in her early 50s (no details known).

Other Variants of Potential Pathogenic Significance.

While searching for genes classified as involved in the RAS-ERK pathway, we incidentally identified multiple variants in genes linked to other syndromes. Two patients (NS100 and NS110) harbored novel variants in FRAS1 (Table S3 and Fig. S4), a causative gene for Fraser syndrome (MIM 219000), an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by cryptophthalmos and other malformations (43). Fraser syndrome is quite rare (incidence ∼1 in 250,000 live births and 1 in 10,000 still births), and therefore the carrier frequency is expected to be 1/100∼1/500. Although the mutations identified in this study (p.A713T and p.R1891H) are not predicted to be damaging (MAPP P = 0.65 and 0.9, respectively), one is located in the conserved furin protease (FU) domain and the other in a domain homologous to the chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan (CSPG) motifs of the NG2 protein (Fig. S4). The latter domain is the most frequently mutated region of FRAS1 in Fraser syndrome (43). Although NS100 and NS110 are potential carriers for a disease-causing FRAS1 allele, the role, if any, of these mutations in the NS phenotype of these patients is unclear.

We also identified novel missense variants in VWF (encoding p.V546G and p.R760L) in two patients (NS03 and NS123; Table S3 and Fig. S4). von Willebrand factor (VWF) encodes a large multimeric glycoprotein important for normal hemostasis (44). Heterozygous VWF mutations can cause von Willebrand disease (VWD; MIM 613160), a common hereditary bleeding disorder. Both variants in our NS patients map to the propeptide region of VWF that is involved in multimerization before its cleavage to produce mature VWF (44). The p.R760L, but not the p.V546G, variant is predicted to be damaging (MAPP P = 1.74 × 10−4 and 0.1294, respectively). Moreover, a missense mutation at arginine 706 (p.R760H), associated with quantitative deficiency of VWF, has been reported in a patient with VWD (45). Patient NS03, who carries VWF p.V546G, reported easy bruising but no overt bleeding problems. NS123, who carries VWF p.R760L, has not reported bleeding symptoms.

Finally, we observed multiple heterozygous variants in genes linked to other genetic syndromes in our cohort of NS patients (Table S5). With the exception of a single MYO7A allele found in autosomal recessive Usher syndrome (MIM 276903), the pathogenic significance of these alleles remains unknown.

Summary and Perspective.

Managing patients with genetic defects requires accurate diagnosis. By performing NGS on 27 NS patients lacking known NS-associated mutations, we identified causative or candidate genes in 13 of 27 NS cases (48%). All of the 13 NS cases are nonfamilial based on clinical diagnosis. However, we could not be certain if these mutations occurred de novo or were inherited because parental DNA samples were not available. As NS is a heterogeneous disorder with variable phenotypic expression, inherited cases might remain unidentified because the affected parent exhibits subtle syndromic phenotypes. The remaining patients harbor single variants in genes encoding potential RAS-ERK pathway members, but the lack of recurrent alleles in these genes suggests that the remaining causes of NS could be rare, potentially private, variants or other genetic mechanisms (e.g., copy number alteration, regulatory region mutations). In this regard, this developmental syndrome resembles many cancers, with a few common driver mutations and a long “tail” of more rare causative variants. Unexpectedly, we also identified mutations in genes associated with other developmental syndromes, which together with clinical reevaluation, prompted a change in diagnosis. Our results indicate that NGS can aid in the often challenging differential diagnosis of young patients with developmental syndromes.

Because the RAS-ERK pathway is best known for its involvement in cancer, drugs that inhibit pathway components are in use or under development (46). Such drugs also could be useful for treating RASopathy patients. Identifying the causative allele in each NS patient is likely to be critical for choosing an effective therapy. For example, mice that carry a Sos1 mutation develop multiple NS features, and these defects can be prevented or their expression reduced by MEK inhibitor treatment during the early stages of life (47). Postnatal MEK inhibitor treatment also reverses some NS symptoms in Raf1 mutant mice (48), and rapamycin normalizes HCM in LS mouse models (5). Analogous models for the new NS genes defined here and by others (28) could prove important for personalizing RASopathy therapy.

Materials and Methods

Patient Samples.

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards of Partners HealthCare, Boston, and Boston Children’s Hospital with informed consent and assent (when applicable). Enrollees were given a clinical diagnosis of NS by a medical geneticist. Each was examined and had records reviewed by A.E.R. (75%) or had photos and records evaluated by A.E.R. (25%). Inclusion criteria were based on the van der Burght system (49). Genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood or another tissue from each enrollee. Participants had the option of whether or not to receive research results of NS causative genes. Most enrollees consented before the advent of exome and genome sequencing. To help guide reporting of unanticipated, medically actionable results (e.g., VWF variants) and recessive disease carrier status (e.g., FRAS variants), we consulted our Institutional Review Board and used the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) Recommendations for Reporting of Incidental Findings in Clinical Exome and Genome Sequencing (50).

Exome Sequencing and Mutation Identification.

Genomic DNA libraries were prepared and captured as described in SI Materials and Methods. Samples were sequenced on an ABI SOLiD (23 cases) or an Illumina Genome Analyzer II (4 cases). Sequencing reads were aligned to human genome Hg18 with Novoalign. Samtools, picard, and the Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK) (51) were used to search for SNVs, allowing three mismatches in 50 nucleotides. To enable additional filtering with the newest dbSNP137, the output was lifted to human genome Hg19 using GATK liftOverVCF, and variants were annotated with SeattleSeqAnnotation 137. The potential impact of amino acid changes (MAPP P value) was assessed with ProPhylER (52). Variants were viewed manually on integrative genomics viewer (igv) to eliminate strand bias and reduce false positive calls.

Identification of Candidate Genes for NS.

We surveyed 789 genes (listed in Table S2) thought to be involved in RAS-ERK pathway regulation from the literature and the GeneAssist pathway Altas. A protein functional interaction (FI) network was also used to analyze sequencing data (53). Seven known NS-associated genes (PTPN11, KRAS, NRAS, RAF1, BRAF, SOS1, and SHOC2) served as seeds to find intermediate-related genes, such that the seeds were connected by intermediate genes either known to be direct interactors or interactors that require one linker (Fig. S2A). Intermediate genes were extracted from the FI network. Genes that were one-hop-away from the seven NS genes were assigned a higher priority for testing (Fig. S2B).

Cloning NS Variants.

NF1-GAP was cloned by RT-PCR from human cardiac cDNA (Invitrogen). MAP2K1, RIT1, and RASA2 cDNAs (from Open Biosystems, Clontech, or Transomics, respectively) were amplified by PCR, with the addition of a Flag tag at their N termini or a MYC tag at their C termini (StrataClone;l Agilent). Amplified fragments were subcloned into pcDNA5/FRT/TO (Invitrogen) to generate Flp-In T-REx 293 cell lines. NS-associated mutants were generated by site-directed mutagenesis. Primers and PCR conditions are available from P.-C.C. and J.Y. on request.

Cell Lines, Transfections, and Protein Analysis.

Flp-In T-REx 293 cells (Invitrogen) were maintained in DMEM plus 10% (vol/vol) FBS and antibiotics. Lines expressing NS variants were generated by cotransfecting host cells with the Flp recombinase-expressing plasmid pOG44 (Invitrogen) and the appropriate pcDNA5/FRT/TO expression plasmids, using FuGENE HD (Promega), as per the manufacturer. Transfected cells were selected in hygromycin (250 µg/mL). Expression of the indicated gene was induced by incubation with 1 µg/mL tetracycline for 24 h before analysis. For transient transfections, HEK293T cells (ATCC) were seeded in antibiotic-free media for 1 d and then transferred into Opti-MEM (Invitrogen). RASA2 siRNAs (Ambion), WT, or NS mutant expression constructs were transfected into HEK293T cells, along with a hemagglutinin (HA)-ERK expression construct, using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). Cells were starved in serum-free DMEM overnight, before stimulation with EGF (5–50 ng/mL, as indicated). Cell lysis, immunoprecipitations, immunoblotting, and quantification are detailed in SI Materials and Methods. To estimate the protein half-lives, Flp-In TREx 293 cells expressing WT or mutant Flag-RIT were induced with tetracycline as above and then treated with 100 μg/mL cycloheximide. At intervals, cell lysates were prepared and analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-Flag antibodies.

Acknowledgments

We thank Xiaojia Ren for technical assistance. This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants R37 CA49132 and HL 083272 (to B.G.N.); U54HG003273 (to R.A.G.); the American Heart Association (11POST5060016) and the National Science Council (102-2320-B-006-043-MY3) (to P.-C.C.); and an Ontario graduate scholarship, a Canadian Institutes for Health Research Canada Graduate Scholarships-Master's scholarship, and Medical Biophysics Excellence Ontario Student Opportunity Trust Funds (to J.Y.). B.G.N. is a Canada Research Chair, tier 1, and work in his laboratory is supported by the Princess Margaret Cancer Foundation and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care.

Footnotes

  • ↵1B.G.N. and R.K. contributed equally to this work.

  • ↵2To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: bneel{at}uhnresearch.ca or rkucherlapati{at}partners.org.
  • Author contributions: P.-C.C., A.E.R., B.G.N., and R.K. designed research; P.-C.C., J.Y., H.-W.Y., T.Y., M.F., V.D.P., and A.E.R. performed research; P.-C.C., E.T.-D., M.B.M., D.M.M., L.S., J.D.M., A.E.R., R.A.G., B.G.N., and R.K. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; P.-C.C., J.Y., C.K.Y., Q.M.T., J.G.R., L.S., J.D.M., and B.G.N. analyzed data; and P.-C.C., B.G.N., and R.K. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1324128111/-/DCSupplemental.

Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Gelb BD,
    2. Tartaglia M
    (2006) Noonan syndrome and related disorders: Dysregulated RAS-mitogen activated protein kinase signal transduction. Hum Mol Genet 15(Spec No 2):R220–R226.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Aoki Y,
    2. Matsubara Y
    (2013) Ras/MAPK syndromes and childhood hemato-oncological diseases. Int J Hematol 97(1):30–36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Rauen KA
    (2013) The RASopathies. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 14:355–369.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Kontaridis MI,
    2. Swanson KD,
    3. David FS,
    4. Barford D,
    5. Neel BG
    (2006) PTPN11 (Shp2) mutations in LEOPARD syndrome have dominant negative, not activating, effects. J Biol Chem 281(10):6785–6792.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Marin TM,
    2. et al.
    (2011) Rapamycin reverses hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in a mouse model of LEOPARD syndrome-associated PTPN11 mutation. J Clin Invest 121(3):1026–1043.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Roberts AE,
    2. Allanson JE,
    3. Tartaglia M,
    4. Gelb BD
    (2013) Noonan syndrome. Lancet 381(9863):333–342.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Tartaglia M,
    2. et al.
    (2001) Mutations in PTPN11, encoding the protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2, cause Noonan syndrome. Nat Genet 29(4):465–468.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Roberts AE,
    2. et al.
    (2007) Germline gain-of-function mutations in SOS1 cause Noonan syndrome. Nat Genet 39(1):70–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Tartaglia M,
    2. et al.
    (2007) Gain-of-function SOS1 mutations cause a distinctive form of Noonan syndrome. Nat Genet 39(1):75–79.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Razzaque MA,
    2. et al.
    (2007) Germline gain-of-function mutations in RAF1 cause Noonan syndrome. Nat Genet 39(8):1013–1017.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Schubbert S,
    2. et al.
    (2006) Germline KRAS mutations cause Noonan syndrome. Nat Genet 38(3):331–336.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Martinelli S,
    2. et al.
    (2010) Heterozygous germline mutations in the CBL tumor-suppressor gene cause a Noonan syndrome-like phenotype. Am J Hum Genet 87(2):250–257.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Cordeddu V,
    2. et al.
    (2009) Mutation of SHOC2 promotes aberrant protein N-myristoylation and causes Noonan-like syndrome with loose anagen hair. Nat Genet 41(9):1022–1026.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Cirstea IC,
    2. et al.
    (2010) A restricted spectrum of NRAS mutations causes Noonan syndrome. Nat Genet 42(1):27–29.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Niemeyer CM,
    2. et al.
    (2010) Germline CBL mutations cause developmental abnormalities and predispose to juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia. Nat Genet 42(9):794–800.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Pandit B,
    2. et al.
    (2007) Gain-of-function RAF1 mutations cause Noonan and LEOPARD syndromes with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Nat Genet 39(8):1007–1012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Colley A,
    2. Donnai D,
    3. Evans DG
    (1996) Neurofibromatosis/Noonan phenotype: A variable feature of type 1 neurofibromatosis. Clin Genet 49(2):59–64.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Wallace MR,
    2. et al.
    (1990) Type 1 neurofibromatosis gene: Identification of a large transcript disrupted in three NF1 patients. Science 249(4965):181–186.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Kaufmann D,
    2. et al.
    (2001) Spinal neurofibromatosis without café-au-lait macules in two families with null mutations of the NF1 gene. Am J Hum Genet 69(6):1395–1400.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Klose A,
    2. et al.
    (1998) Selective disactivation of neurofibromin GAP activity in neurofibromatosis type 1. Hum Mol Genet 7(8):1261–1268.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Upadhyaya M,
    2. et al.
    (1997) Mutational and functional analysis of the neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) gene. Hum Genet 99(1):88–92.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Thomas L,
    2. et al.
    (2012) Assessment of the potential pathogenicity of missense mutations identified in the GTPase-activating protein (GAP)-related domain of the neurofibromatosis type-1 (NF1) gene. Hum Mutat 33(12):1687–1696.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. De Luca A,
    2. et al.
    (2005) NF1 gene mutations represent the major molecular event underlying neurofibromatosis-Noonan syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 77(6):1092–1101.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Croonen EA,
    2. Yntema HG,
    3. van Minkelen R,
    4. van den Ouweland AM,
    5. van der Burgt I
    (2012) Patient with a neurofibromatosis type 1 mutation but a clinical diagnosis of Noonan syndrome. Clin Dysmorphol 21(4):212–214.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Trivier E,
    2. et al.
    (1996) Mutations in the kinase Rsk-2 associated with Coffin-Lowry syndrome. Nature 384(6609):567–570.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Nava C,
    2. et al.
    (2007) Cardio-facio-cutaneous and Noonan syndromes due to mutations in the RAS/MAPK signalling pathway: Genotype-phenotype relationships and overlap with Costello syndrome. J Med Genet 44(12):763–771.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Shi GX,
    2. Andres DA
    (2005) Rit contributes to nerve growth factor-induced neuronal differentiation via activation of B-Raf-extracellular signal-regulated kinase and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades. Mol Cell Biol 25(2):830–846.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Aoki Y,
    2. et al.
    (2013) Gain-of-function mutations in RIT1 cause Noonan syndrome, a RAS/MAPK pathway syndrome. Am J Hum Genet 93(1):173–180.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Araki T,
    2. et al.
    (2009) Noonan syndrome cardiac defects are caused by PTPN11 acting in endocardium to enhance endocardial-mesenchymal transformation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(12):4736–4741.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Gómez-Seguí I,
    2. et al.
    (2013) Novel recurrent mutations in the RAS-like GTP-binding gene RIT1 in myeloid malignancies. Leukemia 27(9):1943–1946.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Forbes SA,
    2. et al.
    (2011) COSMIC: Mining complete cancer genomes in the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer. Nucleic Acids Res 39(Database issue):D945–D950.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Maekawa M,
    2. et al.
    (1994) A novel mammalian Ras GTPase-activating protein which has phospholipid-binding and Btk homology regions. Mol Cell Biol 14(10):6879–6885.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Scheffzek K,
    2. Lautwein A,
    3. Kabsch W,
    4. Ahmadian MR,
    5. Wittinghofer A
    (1996) Crystal structure of the GTPase-activating domain of human p120GAP and implications for the interaction with Ras. Nature 384(6609):591–596.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Lockyer PJ,
    2. et al.
    (1997) Distinct subcellular localisations of the putative inositol 1,3,4,5-tetrakisphosphate receptors GAP1IP4BP and GAP1m result from the GAP1IP4BP PH domain directing plasma membrane targeting. Curr Biol 7(12):1007–1010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Guy GR,
    2. Jackson RA,
    3. Yusoff P,
    4. Chow SY
    (2009) Sprouty proteins: Modified modulators, matchmakers or missing links? J Endocrinol 203(2):191–202.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Basson MA,
    2. et al.
    (2005) Sprouty1 is a critical regulator of GDNF/RET-mediated kidney induction. Dev Cell 8(2):229–239.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Patriotis C,
    2. Makris A,
    3. Chernoff J,
    4. Tsichlis PN
    (1994) Tpl-2 acts in concert with Ras and Raf-1 to activate mitogen-activated protein kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91(21):9755–9759.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Ekvall S,
    2. Hagenäs L,
    3. Allanson J,
    4. Annerén G,
    5. Bondeson ML
    (2011) Co-occurring SHOC2 and PTPN11 mutations in a patient with severe/complex Noonan syndrome-like phenotype. Am J Med Genet A 155A(6):1217–1224.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  39. ↵
    1. Brasil AS,
    2. et al.
    (2010) PTPN11 and KRAS gene analysis in patients with Noonan and Noonan-like syndromes. Genetic Testing Molec Biomarkers 14(3):425–432.
  40. ↵
    1. Brasil AS,
    2. et al.
    (2010) Co-occurring PTPN11 and SOS1 gene mutations in Noonan syndrome: Does this predict a more severe phenotype? Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol 54(8):717–722.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Boileau C,
    2. et al.,
    3. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Go Exome Sequencing Project
    (2012) TGFB2 mutations cause familial thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections associated with mild systemic features of Marfan syndrome. Nat Genet 44(8):916–921.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Lindsay ME,
    2. et al.
    (2012) Loss-of-function mutations in TGFB2 cause a syndromic presentation of thoracic aortic aneurysm. Nat Genet 44(8):922–927.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. van Haelst MM,
    2. et al.,
    3. Fraser Syndrome Collaboration Group
    (2008) Molecular study of 33 families with Fraser syndrome new data and mutation review. Am J Med Genet A 146A(17):2252–2257.
    OpenUrl
  44. ↵
    1. Castaman G
    (2013) New development in von Willebrand disease. Curr Opin Hematol 20(5):424–429.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Riddell AF,
    2. et al.
    (2009) Characterization of W1745C and S1783A: 2 novel mutations causing defective collagen binding in the A3 domain of von Willebrand factor. Blood 114(16):3489–3496.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    1. Schubbert S,
    2. Shannon K,
    3. Bollag G
    (2007) Hyperactive Ras in developmental disorders and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 7(4):295–308.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Chen PC,
    2. et al.
    (2010) Activation of multiple signaling pathways causes developmental defects in mice with a Noonan syndrome–associated Sos1 mutation. J Clin Invest 120(12):4353–4365.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Wu X,
    2. et al.
    (2011) MEK-ERK pathway modulation ameliorates disease phenotypes in a mouse model of Noonan syndrome associated with the Raf1(L613V) mutation. J Clin Invest 121(3):1009–1025.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. van der Burgt I,
    2. et al.
    (1994) Clinical and molecular studies in a large Dutch family with Noonan syndrome. Am J Med Genet 53(2):187–191.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Green RC,
    2. et al.
    (2013) ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. Gen Med 15(7):565–574.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  51. ↵
    1. McKenna A,
    2. et al.
    (2010) The Genome Analysis Toolkit: A MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res 20(9):1297–1303.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    1. Binkley J,
    2. et al.
    (2010) ProPhylER: A curated online resource for protein function and structure based on evolutionary constraint analyses. Genome Res 20(1):142–154.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. ↵
    1. Wu G,
    2. Feng X,
    3. Stein L
    (2010) A human functional protein interaction network and its application to cancer data analysis. Genome Biol 11(5):R53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Next-generation sequencing identifies rare variants associated with Noonan syndrome
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
NGS identifies novel variants for Noonan syndrome
Peng-Chieh Chen, Jiani Yin, Hui-Wen Yu, Tao Yuan, Minerva Fernandez, Christina K. Yung, Quang M. Trinh, Vanya D. Peltekova, Jeffrey G. Reid, Erica Tworog-Dube, Margaret B. Morgan, Donna M. Muzny, Lincoln Stein, John D. McPherson, Amy E. Roberts, Richard A. Gibbs, Benjamin G. Neel, Raju Kucherlapati
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Aug 2014, 111 (31) 11473-11478; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1324128111

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
NGS identifies novel variants for Noonan syndrome
Peng-Chieh Chen, Jiani Yin, Hui-Wen Yu, Tao Yuan, Minerva Fernandez, Christina K. Yung, Quang M. Trinh, Vanya D. Peltekova, Jeffrey G. Reid, Erica Tworog-Dube, Margaret B. Morgan, Donna M. Muzny, Lincoln Stein, John D. McPherson, Amy E. Roberts, Richard A. Gibbs, Benjamin G. Neel, Raju Kucherlapati
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Aug 2014, 111 (31) 11473-11478; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1324128111
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Article Classifications

  • Biological Sciences
  • Medical Sciences
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 111 (31)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results and Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Water from a faucet fills a glass.
News Feature: How “forever chemicals” might impair the immune system
Researchers are exploring whether these ubiquitous fluorinated molecules might worsen infections or hamper vaccine effectiveness.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Dmitry Naumov.
Reflection of clouds in the still waters of Mono Lake in California.
Inner Workings: Making headway with the mysteries of life’s origins
Recent experiments and simulations are starting to answer some fundamental questions about how life came to be.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Radoslaw Lecyk.
Cave in coastal Kenya with tree growing in the middle.
Journal Club: Small, sharp blades mark shift from Middle to Later Stone Age in coastal Kenya
Archaeologists have long tried to define the transition between the two time periods.
Image credit: Ceri Shipton.
Mouse fibroblast cells. Electron bifurcation reactions keep mammalian cells alive.
Exploring electron bifurcation
Jonathon Yuly, David Beratan, and Peng Zhang investigate how electron bifurcation reactions work.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Panda bear hanging in a tree
How horse manure helps giant pandas tolerate cold
A study finds that giant pandas roll in horse manure to increase their cold tolerance.
Image credit: Fuwen Wei.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Cozzarelli Prize
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490