Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
Perspective

Evolution of microbial markets

Gijsbert D. A. Werner, Joan E. Strassmann, Aniek B. F. Ivens, Daniel J. P. Engelmoer, Erik Verbruggen, David C. Queller, Ronald Noë, Nancy Collins Johnson, Peter Hammerstein, and E. Toby Kiers
  1. aDepartment of Ecological Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
  2. bDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130;
  3. cTheoretical Biology Group, Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Studies, University of Groningen, 9700 CC, Groningen, The Netherlands;
  4. dLaboratory of Insect Social Evolution, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065;
  5. eInstitut für Biologie, Plant Ecology, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany;
  6. fFaculté de Psychologie, Université de Strasbourg et Ethologie Evolutive, Département Ecologie, Physiologie et Ethologie, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 67087 Strasbourg Cedex, France;
  7. gNetherlands Institute of Advanced Studies, 2242 PR, Wassenaar, The Netherlands;
  8. hSchool of Earth Sciences and Environmental Sustainability and Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011-5694; and
  9. iInstitute for Theoretical Biology, Humboldt University, 10115 Berlin, Germany

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS January 28, 2014 111 (4) 1237-1244; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1315980111
Gijsbert D. A. Werner
aDepartment of Ecological Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: g.d.a.werner@vu.nl
Joan E. Strassmann
bDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aniek B. F. Ivens
cTheoretical Biology Group, Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Studies, University of Groningen, 9700 CC, Groningen, The Netherlands;
dLaboratory of Insect Social Evolution, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel J. P. Engelmoer
aDepartment of Ecological Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erik Verbruggen
eInstitut für Biologie, Plant Ecology, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195 Berlin, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David C. Queller
bDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ronald Noë
fFaculté de Psychologie, Université de Strasbourg et Ethologie Evolutive, Département Ecologie, Physiologie et Ethologie, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 67087 Strasbourg Cedex, France;
gNetherlands Institute of Advanced Studies, 2242 PR, Wassenaar, The Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nancy Collins Johnson
hSchool of Earth Sciences and Environmental Sustainability and Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011-5694; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Hammerstein
iInstitute for Theoretical Biology, Humboldt University, 10115 Berlin, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E. Toby Kiers
aDepartment of Ecological Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  1. Edited by Richard E. Lenski, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, and approved December 12, 2013 (received for review September 10, 2013)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Biological market theory has been used successfully to explain cooperative behavior in many animal species. Microbes also engage in cooperative behaviors, both with hosts and other microbes, that can be described in economic terms. However, a market approach is not traditionally used to analyze these interactions. Here, we extend the biological market framework to ask whether this theory is of use to evolutionary biologists studying microbes. We consider six economic strategies used by microbes to optimize their success in markets. We argue that an economic market framework is a useful tool to generate specific and interesting predictions about microbial interactions, including the evolution of partner discrimination, hoarding strategies, specialized versus diversified mutualistic services, and the role of spatial structures, such as flocks and consortia. There is untapped potential for studying the evolutionary dynamics of microbial systems. Market theory can help structure this potential by characterizing strategic investment of microbes across a diversity of conditions.

  • cooperation
  • mutualism
  • trade
  • partner choice

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: g.d.a.werner{at}vu.nl.
  • Author contributions: G.D.A.W., J.E.S., A.B.F.I., D.J.P.E., E.V., D.C.Q., R.N., N.C.J., P.H., and E.T.K. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • This paper was conceived at the workshop Cooperation in Multi-Partner Settings: Biological Markets and Social Dilemmas at the Lorentz Center in Leiden, The Netherlands, January 16–20, 2012.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evolution of microbial markets
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Evolution of microbial markets
Gijsbert D. A. Werner, Joan E. Strassmann, Aniek B. F. Ivens, Daniel J. P. Engelmoer, Erik Verbruggen, David C. Queller, Ronald Noë, Nancy Collins Johnson, Peter Hammerstein, E. Toby Kiers
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Jan 2014, 111 (4) 1237-1244; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1315980111

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Evolution of microbial markets
Gijsbert D. A. Werner, Joan E. Strassmann, Aniek B. F. Ivens, Daniel J. P. Engelmoer, Erik Verbruggen, David C. Queller, Ronald Noë, Nancy Collins Johnson, Peter Hammerstein, E. Toby Kiers
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Jan 2014, 111 (4) 1237-1244; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1315980111
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Article Classifications

  • Biological Sciences
  • Evolution
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 111 (4)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Microbial Market Strategies
    • Discussion and Perspectives
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Water from a faucet fills a glass.
News Feature: How “forever chemicals” might impair the immune system
Researchers are exploring whether these ubiquitous fluorinated molecules might worsen infections or hamper vaccine effectiveness.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Dmitry Naumov.
Reflection of clouds in the still waters of Mono Lake in California.
Inner Workings: Making headway with the mysteries of life’s origins
Recent experiments and simulations are starting to answer some fundamental questions about how life came to be.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Radoslaw Lecyk.
Cave in coastal Kenya with tree growing in the middle.
Journal Club: Small, sharp blades mark shift from Middle to Later Stone Age in coastal Kenya
Archaeologists have long tried to define the transition between the two time periods.
Image credit: Ceri Shipton.
Illustration of groups of people chatting
Exploring the length of human conversations
Adam Mastroianni and Daniel Gilbert explore why conversations almost never end when people want them to.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Panda bear hanging in a tree
How horse manure helps giant pandas tolerate cold
A study finds that giant pandas roll in horse manure to increase their cold tolerance.
Image credit: Fuwen Wei.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Cozzarelli Prize
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490