Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
Research Article

Increasing socioeconomic disparities in adolescent obesity

Carl B. Frederick, Kaisa Snellman, and Robert D. Putnam
  1. aHarvard Kennedy School, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; and
  2. bOrganisational Behaviour, INSEAD, 77305 Fontainebleau, France

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS January 28, 2014 111 (4) 1338-1342; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1321355110
Carl B. Frederick
aHarvard Kennedy School, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: robert_putnam@harvard.edu carl_frederick@hks.harvard.edu kaisa.snellman@insead.edu
Kaisa Snellman
aHarvard Kennedy School, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; and
bOrganisational Behaviour, INSEAD, 77305 Fontainebleau, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: robert_putnam@harvard.edu carl_frederick@hks.harvard.edu kaisa.snellman@insead.edu
Robert D. Putnam
aHarvard Kennedy School, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: robert_putnam@harvard.edu carl_frederick@hks.harvard.edu kaisa.snellman@insead.edu
  1. Contributed by Robert D. Putnam, November 14, 2013 (sent for review July 16, 2013)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Significance

Childhood and youth obesity represent significant US public health challenges. Recent findings that the childhood obesity ‘‘epidemic’’ may have slightly abated have been met with relief from health professionals and popular media. However, we document that the overall trend in youth obesity rates masks a significant and growing class gap between youth from upper and lower socioeconomic status (SES) backgrounds. Until 2002, obesity rates increased at similar rates for all adolescents, but since then, obesity has begun to decline among higher SES youth but continued to increase among lower SES youth. These results underscore the need to target public health interventions to disadvantaged youth who remain at risk, as well as to examine how health information circulates through class-biased channels.

Abstract

Recent reports suggest that the rapid growth in youth obesity seen in the 1980s and 1990s has plateaued. We examine changes in obesity among US adolescents aged 12–17 y by socioeconomic background using data from two nationally representative health surveys, the 1988–2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys and the 2003–2011 National Survey of Children’s Health. Although the overall obesity prevalence stabilized, this trend masks a growing socioeconomic gradient: The prevalence of obesity among high-socioeconomic status adolescents has decreased in recent years, whereas the prevalence of obesity among their low-socioeconomic status peers has continued to increase. Additional analyses suggest that socioeconomic differences in the levels of physical activity, as well as differences in calorie intake, may have contributed to the growing obesity gradient.

  • social inequality
  • overweight
  • health disparities
  • social class
  • public policy

Childhood and adolescent obesity is one of the most important current public health concerns in the United States. The prevalence of obesity among adolescents has more than doubled over the past three decades (1). Recent data from the 2009–2010 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) show that more than one-third of adults and almost 17% of children and adolescents were obese. Obesity in children and adolescents increases the risk for a variety of adverse health outcomes, including type 2 diabetes, obstructive sleep apnea, hypertension, dyslipidemia, metabolic syndrome, and various psychosocial problems (2⇓⇓⇓–6).

Recent research suggests that the tide might be turning, however. After years of steady increase, obesity rates have finally begun to plateau (7). Furthermore, American children consumed fewer calories in 2010 than they did a decade before (8). For boys aged 2–19 y, calorie consumption declined by about 7% to 2,100 calories a day over the period of the analysis, from 1999 through 2010. For girls, it dropped by 4% to 1,755 calories a day. Another recent study found that teenagers are exercising more, consuming less sugar, and eating more fruits and vegetables (9).

Some health experts have taken these findings as a sign that the obesity epidemic might finally be abating. According to a recent report released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), obesity rates among low-income preschoolers modestly declined in 19 US states and territories between 2008 and 2011 (10). However, there are compelling reasons to suspect that this abatement may not be equally distributed across youth from different class backgrounds. Socioeconomic background influences an individual’s food consumption and physical activity patterns. Not only are fresh vegetables and fruits costlier than fast food, but healthy alternatives are sometimes hard to find in poor neighborhoods. According to a recent estimate by the US Department of Agriculture, 9.7% of the US population, or 29.7 million people, live in low-income areas more than one mile from a supermarket, where the only options for grocery shopping are “convenience” stores, liquor stores, gas stations, or fast food restaurants that sell foods high in fat, sugar, and salt (11). Low-income families are less likely to own a car, and may thus opt for diets that are shelf-stable (12). Dry packaged foods have a long shelf life, but they also contain refined grains, added sugars, and added fats. Neighborhoods influence not only food access but opportunities for physical activity. Low-income neighborhoods have fewer playgrounds, sidewalks, and recreational facilities (13). Education is linked to both understanding what healthy diet and healthy lifestyle mean as well as how to implement them (14). Children of more educated parents are more likely to eat breakfast and consume fewer calories from snacks, and they are less likely to eat foods with high-energy content, such as sweetened beverages (15).

Although substantial socioeconomic inequalities in childhood and adolescent obesity are well documented, there is no consensus on the extent to which social disparities in obesity have changed over time. Indeed, some studies have suggested that socioeconomic gaps in the prevalence of obesity among youth have increased (16⇓⇓–19), whereas other research has suggested that disparities have not changed (20) or have even decreased (21, 22). To address this question, we examined socioeconomic disparities in the prevalence of obesity among adolescents aged 12–17 y using data from two large, nationally representative federal health surveys, the 1988–2010 NHANES and the 2003–2011 National Survey of Children’s Health (NSCH).

Results

Prevalence of Adolescent Obesity.

The national prevalence of obesity among adolescents aged 12–17 y increased from 9.1% [95% confidence interval (CI): 7.7–10.5] in 1988–1991 to 17.0% (95% CI: 14.7–19.2) in 2003–2004. There was no change in obesity prevalence between 2003–2004 and 2009–2010, however, suggesting that the rapid increases in obesity seen in the 1980s and 1990s are leveling off. Our analysis suggests that this encouraging trend might be masking growing socioeconomic disparities. [Consistent with prior research using NHANES data, we do not find significant differences in obesity prevalence by family income or education among children aged 2–5 y or 6–11 y (22)].

Fig. 1 shows clear differences in obesity prevalence among adolescents by parental education in both surveys. In the NHANES (Fig. 1A), a growing gap appears to reemerge beginning with the 2007–2008 data collection period. Furthermore, the class-specific trends in obesity prevalence appear to diverge beginning with the 2003–2004 period: The point estimates for children of parents who have at most a high school degree increase, whereas the point estimates for children of parents who have at least a 4-y college degree begin to decline. The fact that we find a similar and more precisely estimated pattern and timing of the growing class gaps in the NSCH data (Fig. 1B) provides corroborating evidence. We find similar trends when we use a measure of family income instead of parental education to measure socioeconomic status (SES) (Fig. S1).

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Trends in obesity among adolescents aged 12–17 y by parental education in the NHANES III (1999–2010) (A) and the NSCH (2003, 2007, and 2011). (B) Obesity is defined as being at or above the sex- and age-specific 95th percentile of the 2000 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) growth charts. Error bars indicate 95% CIs. BA, bachelor's degree; HS, high school.

We test the robustness of these findings via a series of simulations, a subset of which is shown in Fig. 2 (details are provided in SI Text). Based on the entire set of simulated values, we calculated the proportion of simulations in which the class gap increased, the prevalence of obesity declined among children of highly educated parents, and the prevalence of obesity for children of less educated parents increased for each pair of surveys between 2003–2004 and 2009–2010 (Table S1). Except for the comparisons between 2007–2008 and 2005–2006, we find support for growing class gaps in the prevalence of obesity, especially considering the small cell sizes upon which these estimates are based and the short period between surveys. The 2009–2010 class gap was larger than the 2003–2004 class gap in more than 97% of the simulations.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Visualizing uncertainty in the obesity gap among adolescents aged 12–17 y in the NHANES III (1999–2010). The narrow lines are based on 1,000 simulated trends, and the dark lines are the means of the simulated trend estimates.

Turning to the direction of the class-specific trends, we see that across the final four NHANES, the prevalence of obesity among children of college graduates declined in more than 95% of the simulations, whereas the prevalence of obesity among children whose parents have at most a high school diploma increased in more than 92% of the simulations (Fig. S2, simulations are based on NSCH data).

We also tested the robustness of these findings by looking at the class-specific trends within race-ethnic groups. The divergence was even greater among non-Hispanic whites than it was for the entire sample (Fig. S3). Although the number of high SES adolescents among nonwhite ethnic groups was too small to derive conclusive evidence, we failed to find statistically significant differences between non-Hispanic blacks, Hispanics, and adolescents from other race-ethnic groups and their non-Hispanic white peers. (Within race-ethnic group analyses are available from the authors upon request.) Since the growing class gap appears robustly when we confine the analysis to whites only, the growing gap itself does not spuriously reflect race-ethnic differences. The available national samples are too small to explore race-class interactions or to determine reliably whether the growing class gap also appears among non-white adolescents taken alone.

Potential Explanations for the Growing Gap.

Excessive food intake is a major contributor to obesity. Another large contributor to high rates of childhood obesity is lack of physical activity (23). Children who routinely participate in sports or activities outside of school or who walk or bike to school are less likely to be overweight or obese compared with children who do not participate in free-time physical activity and are driven to school (24). Consequently, to provide further insight into factors that contribute to childhood obesity, we examine class disparities in behaviors related to energy intake and physical activity.

Figs. 3 and 4 plot the trends in caloric intake and physical activity, respectively (also see Table S2). Average daily energy intake decreased over this 12-y period among all children. However, energy intake fell more among high SES children: The average energy intake for adolescents with college-educated parents decreased from 2,487 (95% CI: 2,287–2,687) kilocalories in 1988–1991 to 2,150 (95% CI: 2,032–2,268) kilocalories in 2009–2010. In contrast, the average energy intake for adolescents with high school-educated parents decreased from 2,271 (95% CI: 2,147–2,394) kilocalories in 1989–1991 to 2,105 (95% CI: 1,994–2,215) kilocalories in 2009–2010.

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Trends in daily caloric intake among adolescents aged 12–17 y by parental education in the NHANES III (1999–2010). Error bars indicate 95% CIs.

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Trends in adolescent physical activity by parental education in the NHANES (1999–2010) (A) and the NSCH (2003, 2007, and 2011) (B) In the NHANES, physical activity is defined as at least 10 min in the past 30 d. In the NSCH, it is defined as at least 20 min in the past 7 d. Error bars indicate 95% CIs.

Fig. 4 shows a clear socioeconomic disparity in physical activity in both the NHANES and NSCH. In 2003, 93.4% (95% CI: 89.5–97.3) of adolescents with college-educated parents reported at least 10 min of continuous physical activity in the past 30 d and 86.6% (95% CI: 85.9–87.3) reported having exercised or played a sport for 20 min or more at least once in the past 7 d. In contrast, adolescents with high school-educated parents reported significantly lower levels of physical participation: 90.0% (95% CI: 87.3–92.7) reported at least 10 min of physical activity in the past 30 d, and 79.8% (95% CI: 78.4–81.2) reported having exercised or played a sport for 20 min or more at least once in the past 7 d.

In the most recent wave of each survey, there is a significant increase in disparities in physical activity. In 2009–2010, 94.7% (95% CI: 91.7–97.7) of adolescents with college-educated parents reported some physical activity in the past 30 d compared with only 82.1% (95% CI: 76.5–87.8) of adolescents with high school-educated parents. In 2011, 91% (95% CI: 90.2–91.7) of adolescents whose parents have at least some college education reported at least 20 min of activity in the past week compared with 80.4% (95% CI: 78.2–82.6) whose parents have a high school education or less. In short, in 2003, the class gap in physical activity was 3 to 7 percentage points, whereas in 2009–2011, the comparable class gap was 11 to 13 percentage points.

Discussion

Childhood obesity is associated with increased health risks and decreased quality of life, as well as declining adult health and greater health care costs. In response, national and state health policies are being developed and adopted across a variety of sectors to reduce the burden of childhood obesity. Health care professionals, schools, and advocacy organizations are now engaged in efforts to prevent and reduce childhood overweight and obesity. On the surface, at least, these efforts have not been in vain. After years of steady increase, obesity rates have finally begun to level off (7, 10). Overall, children are consuming fewer calories today than they did a decade ago, and fewer of their calories are coming from carbohydrates (8, 9). The consumption of fast food has also declined (25). Children are also more physically active than they were a decade ago (9).

However, the public health message has not diffused evenly across the population. We find that although the overall obesity prevalence has plateaued, the trend looks very different across different subgroups. The prevalence of obesity among adolescents of well-educated families has decreased in recent years, whereas the prevalence of obesity among their peers in less educated families has continued to increase. To design effective interventions, it is important to understand how different populations vary in the health behaviors that lead to obesity.

The obesity epidemic is a complex public health problem, but in its simplest form, obesity results from an energy imbalance where caloric intake exceeds the calories expended by physical activity and metabolic processes: We take in more calories that we expend. This seemingly simple imbalance has many underlying causes: Obesity reflects complex interactions among genetic, metabolic, behavioral, cultural, and environmental factors. Behavioral factors include sedentary lifestyles and consumption of excess calories and reflect environmental factors that influence behaviors, and thus energy intake and energy output. The physical environment can encourage or discourage physical activity, and the availability of food can encourage or discourage a healthy diet. In addition, there is both quantitative and qualitative evidence that social networks and community ties influence eating and activity behaviors (26⇓–28).

Increases in the prevalence of obesity have often been linked to increases in unhealthy eating habits, such as the consumption of refined grains and sugar-sweetened beverages. In the 1980s and 1990s, the consumption of carbohydrates increased rapidly in the United States. In 1994–1996, more than one-third of carbohydrates consumed by adults and children above the age of 2 y came from caloric sweeteners, such as soft drinks (29). Increases in the consumption of junk food and increased portion size of fast food have been linked to increasing body weight (30). Consequently, reducing the consumption of high-energy, low-nutrition food has been the focus of many public health programs. The effort is paying off: We find that children from all socioeconomic backgrounds consumed fewer calories in 2010 than they did a decade before.

Despite these healthy changes in energy consumption, some children continue to gain weight. Our findings suggest that increasing health disparities stem from growing differences in both calorie intake and physical activity. Although the average energy intake has decreased among all children, it has fallen more among children from wealthy, educated homes. Many children live a sedentary lifestyle that makes it difficult for them to expend enough calories to make up for what they consume. In 2002, three-fifths of children between the ages of 9 and 13 y did not participate in any organized physical activity outside of school hours and almost a quarter failed to engage in any physical activity during their free time (31). Moreover, there is an increasing class gradient in physical activity. We find that children of college-educated parents not only consume fewer calories than they did a decade before but that they are physically more active than they were before. Children of less educated parents, however, did not experience a similar increase in physical activity. This could be because many low SES children live in environments that do not facilitate a physically active lifestyle. The lack of community recreational centers, playgrounds, or sidewalks and concerns for safety when outdoors can stand in the way of children being physically active (32, 33). However, although neighborhood constraints may contribute to differences in physical activity, this is not the full story: Participation in high school sports and clubs has increased among high SES adolescents while decreasing among their low SES peers.*

Eliminating socioeconomic disparities in health outcomes is a key public policy priority. In recent years, many national initiatives, such as the Let’s Move initiative, and recommendations from the American Public Health Association, American Academy of Pediatrics, and Institute of Medicine have built awareness around childhood obesity. Our findings indicate that health inequalities related to obesity are increasing and that the social determinants of obesity are complex. More research is needed to help understand the underlying causes of the disparities. In addition, future research on the health and economic consequences of childhood obesity is needed, both in the whole population and in subgroups. More vigorous government support and targeted programs are needed to fight the epidemic, reduce the disparities in physical activity, and prepare the nation to face the related future consequences. Eating behaviors and lifestyles established in childhood often track into later life. If a boy is overweight at the age of 16 y, he will have an 80% likelihood of remaining obese as an adult (92% for girls) (34). Thus, effective intervention programs to promote healthy lifestyles among young people (especially among lower SES youth) will not only aid in the fight against the youth obesity epidemic but will help prevent other chronic diseases, reduce future health care costs, and pave the way for a healthier nation.

Acknowledgments

We thank Robert M. Axelrod, Harvey Fineberg, and Christopher Murray for helpful discussions during the early stages of this project and Thomas Sander, Jennifer M. Silva, Chaeyoon Lim, and Catherine Womack for comments on this manuscript. We also thank the reviewers, Elsie M. Taveras, Matthew W. Gillman, and Ross Hammond, for their comments and suggestions. For support of our larger research project on inequality, we thank the Annie E. Casey Foundation, the Carnegie Corporation of New York, the Ford Foundation, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, the Markle Foundation, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, and the Spencer Foundation. We also thank the INSEAD Alumni Fund (IAF) for support of this project.

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence may be addressed. E-mail: robert_putnam{at}harvard.edu, carl_frederick{at}hks.harvard.edu, or kaisa.snellman{at}insead.edu.
  • Author contributions: C.B.F., K.S., and R.D.P. designed research; C.B.F. and K.S. performed research; C.B.F. and K.S. analyzed data; and C.B.F., K.S., and R.D.P. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • ↵* Frederick C, Snellman K, Putnam R (2013) Growing class differences in youth civic engagement. American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, August 9, 2013, New York.

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1321355110/-/DCSupplemental.

Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Ogden CL,
    2. Flegal KM,
    3. Carroll MD,
    4. Johnson CL
    (2002) Prevalence and trends in overweight among US children and adolescents, 1999-2000. JAMA 288(14):1728–1732.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Daniels SR,
    2. et al.
    (2005) Overweight in children and adolescents: Pathophysiology, consequences, prevention, and treatment. Circulation 111(15):1999–2012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Wright CM,
    2. Parker L,
    3. Lamont D,
    4. Craft AW
    (2001) Implications of childhood obesity for adult health: Findings from thousand families cohort study. BMJ 323(7324):1280–1284.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Dietz WH
    (1998) Health consequences of obesity in youth: Childhood predictors of adult disease. Pediatrics 101(3 Pt 2):518–525.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Ebbeling CB,
    2. Pawlak DB,
    3. Ludwig DS
    (2002) Childhood obesity: Public-health crisis, common sense cure. Lancet 360(9331):473–482.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Williams J,
    2. Wake M,
    3. Hesketh K,
    4. Maher E,
    5. Waters E
    (2005) Health-related quality of life of overweight and obese children. JAMA 293(1):70–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Ogden C, Carroll M, Kit BK, Flegal K (2012) Prevalence of Obesity in the United States, 2009–2010. National Center for Health Statistics Data Brief No 82. National Center for Health Statistics. Hyattsville, MD.
  8. ↵
    Ervin RB, Ogden CL (2013) Trends in Intake of Energy and Macronutrients in Children and Adolescents from 1999–2000 Through 2009–2010. National Center for Health Statistics Data Brief No 113. National Center for Health Statistics. Hyattsville, MD.
  9. ↵
    1. Iannotti RJ,
    2. Wang J
    (2013) Trends in physical activity, sedentary behavior, diet, and BMI among us adolescents, 2001-2009. Pediatrics 132(4):606–614.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    (2013) Vital signs: Obesity among low-income, preschool-aged children—United States, 2008-2011. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 62(31):629–634.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    Ver Ploeg M, et al. (2012) Access to Affordable and Nutritious Food: Updated Estimates of Distance to Supermarkets using 2010 Data. ERR-143 (US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, DC).
  12. ↵
    1. Drewnowski A
    (1998) Energy density, palatability, and satiety: Implications for weight control. Nutr Rev 56(12):347–353.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Vaughan KB,
    2. et al.
    (2013) Exploring the distribution of park availability, features, and quality across Kansas City, Missouri by income and race/ethnicity: An environmental justice investigation. Ann Behav Med 45(Suppl 1):S28–S38.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Wardle J,
    2. Parmenter K,
    3. Waller J
    (2000) Nutrition knowledge and food intake. Appetite 34(3):269–275.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Kant AK,
    2. Graubard BI
    (2013) Family income and education were related with 30-year time trends in dietary and meal behaviors of American children and adolescents. J Nutr 143(5):690–700.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Bethell C,
    2. Simpson L,
    3. Stumbo S,
    4. Carle AC,
    5. Gombojav N
    (2010) National, state, and local disparities in childhood obesity. Health Aff (Millwood) 29(3):347–356.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Miech RA,
    2. et al.
    (2006) Trends in the association of poverty with overweight among US adolescents, 1971-2004. JAMA 295(20):2385–2393.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Singh GK,
    2. Siahpush M,
    3. Kogan MD
    (2010) Rising social inequalities in US childhood obesity, 2003-2007. Ann Epidemiol 20(1):40–52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Wen X,
    2. et al.
    (2012) Decreasing prevalence of obesity among young children in Massachusetts from 2004 to 2008. Pediatrics 129(5):823–831.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Rossen LM,
    2. Schoendorf KC
    (2012) Measuring health disparities: Trends in racial-ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in obesity among 2- to 18-year old youth in the United States, 2001-2010. Ann Epidemiol 22(10):698–704.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Zhang Q,
    2. Wang Y
    (2007) Using concentration index to study changes in socio-economic inequality of overweight among US adolescents between 1971 and 2002. Int J Epidemiol 36(4):916–925.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Wang Y
    (2011) Disparities in pediatric obesity in the United States. Adv Nutr 2(1):23–31.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Patrick K,
    2. et al.
    (2004) Diet, physical activity, and sedentary behaviors as risk factors for overweight in adolescence. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 158(4):385–390.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Drake KM,
    2. et al.
    (2012) Influence of sports, physical education, and active commuting to school on adolescent weight status. Pediatrics 130(2):e296–e304.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Fryar CD, Ervin RB (2013) Caloric Intake from Fast Food Among Adults: United States, 2007-2010. National Center for Health Statistics Data Brief No 114. National Center for Health Statistics. Hyattsville, MD.
  26. ↵
    1. Christakis NA,
    2. Fowler JH
    (2007) The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. N Engl J Med 357(4):370–379.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Mulvaney-Day N,
    2. Womack C
    (2009) Obesity, identity and community: Leveraging social networks for behavior change in public health. Public Health Ethics 2(3):250–260.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Kaufman L,
    2. Karpati A
    (2007) Understanding the sociocultural roots of childhood obesity: Food practices among Latino families of Bushwick, Brooklyn. Soc Sci Med 64(11):2177–2188.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Popkin BM,
    2. Nielsen SJ
    (2003) The sweetening of the world’s diet. Obes Res 11(11):1325–1332.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. US Department of Agriculture and US Department of Health and Human Services
    (2010) Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2010 (US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC), ed 7.
  31. ↵
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    (2003) Physical activity levels among children aged 9-13 years—United States, 2002. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 52(33):785–788.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Gordon-Larsen P,
    2. Nelson MC,
    3. Page P,
    4. Popkin BM
    (2006) Inequality in the built environment underlies key health disparities in physical activity and obesity. Pediatrics 117(2):417–424.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Giles-Corti B,
    2. Donovan RJ
    (2003) Relative influences of individual, social environmental, and physical environmental correlates of walking. Am J Public Health 93(9):1583–1589.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Wang LY,
    2. Chyen D,
    3. Lee S,
    4. Lowry R
    (2008) The association between body mass index in adolescence and obesity in adulthood. J Adolesc Health 42(5):512–518.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Increasing socioeconomic disparities in adolescent obesity
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Increasing SES disparities in adolescent obesity
Carl B. Frederick, Kaisa Snellman, Robert D. Putnam
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Jan 2014, 111 (4) 1338-1342; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1321355110

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Increasing SES disparities in adolescent obesity
Carl B. Frederick, Kaisa Snellman, Robert D. Putnam
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Jan 2014, 111 (4) 1338-1342; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1321355110
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Article Classifications

  • Social Sciences
  • Social Sciences
  • Biological Sciences
  • Medical Sciences

This article has a Letter. Please see:

  • Relationship between Research Article and Letter - May 19, 2014

See related content:

  • Race does not explain growing class gap in obesity
    - May 19, 2014
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 111 (4)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Smoke emanates from Japan’s Fukushima nuclear power plant a few days after tsunami damage
Core Concept: Muography offers a new way to see inside a multitude of objects
Muons penetrate much further than X-rays, they do essentially zero damage, and they are provided for free by the cosmos.
Image credit: Science Source/Digital Globe.
Water from a faucet fills a glass.
News Feature: How “forever chemicals” might impair the immune system
Researchers are exploring whether these ubiquitous fluorinated molecules might worsen infections or hamper vaccine effectiveness.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Dmitry Naumov.
Venus flytrap captures a fly.
Journal Club: Venus flytrap mechanism could shed light on how plants sense touch
One protein seems to play a key role in touch sensitivity for flytraps and other meat-eating plants.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Kuttelvaserova Stuchelova.
Illustration of groups of people chatting
Exploring the length of human conversations
Adam Mastroianni and Daniel Gilbert explore why conversations almost never end when people want them to.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Panda bear hanging in a tree
How horse manure helps giant pandas tolerate cold
A study finds that giant pandas roll in horse manure to increase their cold tolerance.
Image credit: Fuwen Wei.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Cozzarelli Prize
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490