Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology

Equity theory and fair inequality: A neuroeconomic study

Alexander W. Cappelen, Tom Eichele, Kenneth Hugdahl, Karsten Specht, Erik Ø. Sørensen, and Bertil Tungodden
PNAS October 28, 2014 111 (43) 15368-15372; published ahead of print October 13, 2014 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1414602111
Alexander W. Cappelen
aDepartment of Economics and The Choice Lab, NHH Norwegian School of Economics, N-5045 Bergen, Norway;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tom Eichele
bDepartment of Biological and Medical Psychology, University of Bergen, N-5009 Bergen, Norway;cDepartment of Neurology, Section for Clinical Neurophysiology, Haukeland University Hospital, N-5021 Bergen, Norway;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kenneth Hugdahl
bDepartment of Biological and Medical Psychology, University of Bergen, N-5009 Bergen, Norway;dDivision of Psychiatry, Haukeland University Hospital, N-5021 Bergen, Norway;eDepartment of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, N-5021 Bergen, Norway;fKG Jebsen Center for Neuropsychiatric Disorders, University of Bergen, N-5009 Bergen, Norway;gNORMENT, Center of Excellence, University of Oslo, N-0424 Oslo, Norway; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karsten Specht
bDepartment of Biological and Medical Psychology, University of Bergen, N-5009 Bergen, Norway;hDepartment of Clinical Engineering, Haukeland University Hospital, N-5021 Bergen, Norway
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erik Ø. Sørensen
aDepartment of Economics and The Choice Lab, NHH Norwegian School of Economics, N-5045 Bergen, Norway;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: erik.sorensen@nhh.no
Bertil Tungodden
aDepartment of Economics and The Choice Lab, NHH Norwegian School of Economics, N-5045 Bergen, Norway;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  1. Edited by Aldo Rustichini, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, and accepted by the Editorial Board September 3, 2014 (received for review August 4, 2014)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Significance

People’s preferences for income distribution fundamentally affect their behavior and contribute to shaping important social and political institutions. The study of such preferences has become a major topic in behavioral research in social psychology and economics. Despite the large literature studying preferences for income distribution, there is no direct neuronal evidence of how the brain responds to income distributions when people have made different contributions in terms of work effort. The present paper reports from, to our knowledge, the first neuroimaging study designed to examine how the brain responds to the distribution of income in such situations. As such, to our knowledge it is also the first study to examine the neuronal basis for equity theory.

Abstract

The present paper reports results from, to our knowledge, the first study designed to examine the neuronal responses to income inequality in situations in which individuals have made different contributions in terms of work effort. We conducted an experiment that included a prescanning phase in which the participants earned money by working, and a neuronal scanning phase in which we examined how the brain responded when the participants evaluated different distributions of their earnings. We provide causal evidence for the relative contribution of work effort being crucial for understanding the hemodynamic response in the brain to inequality. We found a significant hemodynamic response in the striatum to deviations from the distribution of income that was proportional to work effort, but found no effect of deviations from the equal distribution of income. We also observed a striking correlation between the hemodynamic response in the striatum and the self-reported evaluation of the income distributions. Our results provide, to our knowledge, the first set of neuronal evidence for equity theory and suggest that people distinguish between fair and unfair inequalities.

  • fairness
  • inequality
  • striatum
  • equity theory

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: erik.sorensen{at}nhh.no.
  • Author contributions: A.W.C., T.E., K.H., K.S., E.Ø.S., and B.T. designed research; T.E., K.H., and K.S. performed research; A.W.C., T.E., K.H., K.S., E.Ø.S., and B.T. analyzed data; and A.W.C., T.E., K.H., K.S., E.Ø.S., and B.T. wrote the paper. The authors are listed in alphabetical order.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. A.R. is a guest editor invited by the Editorial Board.

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1414602111/-/DCSupplemental.

Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.

View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Equity theory and fair inequality: A neuroeconomic study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
Citation Tools
Equity theory and fair inequality
Alexander W. Cappelen, Tom Eichele, Kenneth Hugdahl, Karsten Specht, Erik Ø. Sørensen, Bertil Tungodden
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Oct 2014, 111 (43) 15368-15372; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1414602111

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Equity theory and fair inequality
Alexander W. Cappelen, Tom Eichele, Kenneth Hugdahl, Karsten Specht, Erik Ø. Sørensen, Bertil Tungodden
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Oct 2014, 111 (43) 15368-15372; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1414602111
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 116 (8)
Current Issue

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

News Feature: Cities serve as testbeds for evolutionary change
Urban living can pressure flora and fauna to adapt in intriguing ways. Biologists are starting to take advantage of this convenient laboratory of evolution.
Image credit: Kristin Winchell (Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis).
Several aspects of the proposal, which aims to expand open access, require serious discussion and, in some cases, a rethink.
Opinion: “Plan S” falls short for society publishers—and for the researchers they serve
Several aspects of the proposal, which aims to expand open access, require serious discussion and, in some cases, a rethink.
Image credit: Dave Cutler (artist).
Featured Profile
PNAS Profile of NAS member and biochemist Hao Wu
 Nonmonogamous strawberry poison frog (Oophaga pumilio).  Image courtesy of Yusan Yang (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh).
Putative signature of monogamy
A study suggests a putative gene-expression hallmark common to monogamous male vertebrates of some species, namely cichlid fishes, dendrobatid frogs, passeroid songbirds, common voles, and deer mice, and identifies 24 candidate genes potentially associated with monogamy.
Image courtesy of Yusan Yang (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh).
Active lifestyles. Image courtesy of Pixabay/MabelAmber.
Meaningful life tied to healthy aging
Physical and social well-being in old age are linked to self-assessments of life worth, and a spectrum of behavioral, economic, health, and social variables may influence whether aging individuals believe they are leading meaningful lives.
Image courtesy of Pixabay/MabelAmber.

More Articles of This Classification

Social Sciences

  • The nature of recollection across months and years and after medial temporal lobe damage
  • Stalls in Africa’s fertility decline partly result from disruptions in female education
  • Self-regulation and the foraging gene (PRKG1) in humans
Show more

Economic Sciences

  • Designing combinatorial exchanges for the reallocation of resource rights
  • Climate change and residential electricity consumption in the Yangtze River Delta, China
  • Dynamic effects of enforcement on cooperation
Show more

Biological Sciences

  • Unnatural verticilide enantiomer inhibits type 2 ryanodine receptor-mediated calcium leak and is antiarrhythmic
  • Unleashing floret fertility in wheat through the mutation of a homeobox gene
  • Arg302 governs the pKa of Glu325 in LacY
Show more

Neuroscience

  • The nature of recollection across months and years and after medial temporal lobe damage
  • Circadian clock protein Rev-erbα regulates neuroinflammation
  • Genetically eliminating Purkinje neuron GABAergic neurotransmission increases their response gain to vestibular motion
Show more

Related Content

  • No related articles found.
  • Scopus
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited by...

  • Moral consequences of becoming unemployed
  • Scopus (10)
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive

PNAS Portals

  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Teaching Resources
  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Site Map

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2019 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490