Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
    • PNAS Nexus
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Publication Charges
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
    • PNAS Nexus
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Publication Charges
  • Submit
Research Article

Reconciling disagreement over climate–conflict results in Africa

Solomon M. Hsiang and Kyle C. Meng
  1. aGoldman School of Public Policy, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720;
  2. bNational Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA 02138;
  3. cWoodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544; and
  4. dOffice of Economic Policy and Analysis, Environmental Defense Fund, New York, NY 10010

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS February 11, 2014 111 (6) 2100-2103; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1316006111
Solomon M. Hsiang
aGoldman School of Public Policy, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720;
bNational Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA 02138;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kyle C. Meng
cWoodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544; and
dOffice of Economic Policy and Analysis, Environmental Defense Fund, New York, NY 10010
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  1. Edited by B. L. Turner, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, and approved November 27, 2013 (received for review August 26, 2013)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Significance

Whether climatic changes affect civil conflicts has been the subject of intense academic debate. Much of this controversy originates from a highly cited dispute between a previous PNAS paper—which finds that civil war incidence in sub-Saharan Africa is associated with increasing local temperature—and a subsequent rebuke of this result, also published in PNAS. We reexamine this apparent disagreement by comparing the statistical models from the two papers using formal tests. When we implement the correct statistical procedure, we find that the evidence presented in the second paper is actually consistent with that of the first. We conclude that the original grounds for the dispute over whether the climate–conflict relationship exists were erroneous.

Abstract

A recent study by Burke et al. [Burke M, Miguel E, Satyanath S, Dykema J, Lobell D (2009) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(49):20670–20674] reports statistical evidence that the likelihood of civil wars in African countries was elevated in hotter years. A following study by Buhaug [Buhaug H (2010) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(38):16477–16482] reports that a reexamination of the evidence overturns Burke et al.’s findings when alternative statistical models and alternative measures of conflict are used. We show that the conclusion by Buhaug is based on absent or incorrect statistical tests, both in model selection and in the comparison of results with Burke et al. When we implement the correct tests, we find there is no evidence presented in Buhaug that rejects the original results of Burke et al.

  • climate change
  • temperature
  • security

Footnotes

  • ↵1S.M.H. and K.C.M. contributed equally to this work.

  • ↵2To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: kmeng{at}princeton.edu.
  • Author contributions: S.M.H. and K.C.M. designed research, performed research, analyzed data, and wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

  • See Commentary on page 2054.

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1316006111/-/DCSupplemental.

View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reconciling disagreement over climate–conflict results in Africa
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Reconciling debate in climate–conflict studies
Solomon M. Hsiang, Kyle C. Meng
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Feb 2014, 111 (6) 2100-2103; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1316006111

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Reconciling debate in climate–conflict studies
Solomon M. Hsiang, Kyle C. Meng
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Feb 2014, 111 (6) 2100-2103; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1316006111
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Article Classifications

  • Social Sciences
  • Sustainability Science

See related content:

  • Climate–conflict link depends on models and data
    - Jan 31, 2014

This article has a Letter. Please see:

  • Concealing agreements over climate–conflict results - January 15, 2014
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 111 (6)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Protective infrastructure along the San Francisco Bay shoreline.
Economic impact of sea level rise protection
Infrastructure built to protect cities from flooding can increase economic damages elsewhere.
Image credit: Michelle A. Hummel.
Venus.
Abiotic source of phosphine on Venus
Phosphine in the Venusian atmosphere can be explained without biogenic sources and is consistent with ongoing volcanism on Venus.
Image credit: Wikimedia Commons/NASA.
Coronavirus.
Estimating true number of COVID-19 infections
A study finds underreporting of COVID-19 cases in the United States and that the United States is likely far from achieving herd immunity through infection alone.
Image credit: Pixabay/geralt.
Three test tubes with lethal doses of heroin, carfentanil, and fentanyl.
Inner Workings: Vaccines aim to fight drugs of abuse
Researchers hope vaccines can serve as a key tool for addressing the opioid epidemic. The first clinical trials are underway, though big challenges remain.
Image credit: United States Drug Enforcement Administration.
Factories belch pollution into a hazy sky as the sun peaks out from behind the clouds.
Journal Club: How to incorporate changing human behaviors into planetary models
Eyeing the effects of the Anthropocene, researchers offer a novel framework to identify and combine models from across the physical and social sciences.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Victor Lauer.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Cozzarelli Prize
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490. PNAS is a partner of CHORUS, COPE, CrossRef, ORCID, and Research4Life.