Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
Perspective

Toward a new vaccine for pertussis

John B. Robbins, Rachel Schneerson, Joanna Kubler-Kielb, Jerry M. Keith, Birger Trollfors, Evgeny Vinogradov, and Joseph Shiloach
  1. aNational Institute of Child Health and Human Development and
  2. dNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892;
  3. bDepartment of Pediatrics, Sahlgrenska Hospital, 413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden; and
  4. cNational Research Council, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1A 0R6

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS March 4, 2014 111 (9) 3213-3216; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1324149111
John B. Robbins
aNational Institute of Child Health and Human Development and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: johnbennettrobbins@gmail.com
Rachel Schneerson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joanna Kubler-Kielb
aNational Institute of Child Health and Human Development and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jerry M. Keith
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Birger Trollfors
bDepartment of Pediatrics, Sahlgrenska Hospital, 413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Evgeny Vinogradov
cNational Research Council, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1A 0R6
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph Shiloach
dNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  1. Edited by Rino Rappuoli, Novartis Vaccines and Diagnostics Srl, Siena, Italy, and approved January 22, 2014 (received for review November 25, 2013)

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

To overcome the limitations of the current pertussis vaccines, those of limited duration of action and failure to induce direct killing of Bordetella pertussis, a synthetic scheme was devised for preparing a conjugate vaccine composed of the Bordetella bronchiseptica core oligosaccharide with one terminal trisaccharide to aminooxylated BSA via their terminal ketodeoxyoctanate residues. Conjugate-induced antibodies, by a fraction of an estimated human dose injected into young outbred mice as a saline solution, were bactericidal against B. pertussis, and their titers correlated with their ELISA values. The carrier protein is planned to be genetically altered pertussis toxoid. Such conjugates are easy to prepare, stable, and should add both to the level and duration of immunity induced by current vaccine-induced pertussis antibodies and reduce the circulation of B. pertussis.

  • new pertussis vaccine
  • lipooligosaccharide conjugate

Pertussis, a highly contagious respiratory disease, has been the subject of research worldwide since its cause, Bordetella pertussis, was discovered in 1906 (1). However, despite a century of study in the laboratory and clinic and widespread use of the acellular vaccine for infants and young adults (2, 3), there is yet no agreement about a definition of immunity to pertussis, an entirely satisfactory vaccine, or an explanation for outbreaks throughout the world (4⇓⇓–7). Implicated as causes of these outbreaks are an increased awareness of the disease, better diagnostic tools, improved surveillance, waning vaccine-induced immunity, mutations in B. pertussis antigens, and low immunization rates, some due to exemptions from vaccination. Is there an increased incidence of pertussis in the United States in addition to the renewed recognition of pertussis in older children and adults? Many have not considered the low vaccination coverage and booster immunization of unregistered immigrants and their children, especially in large cities, as a cause of these outbreaks (8). However, deficiencies of the current acellular vaccine is in our opinion the most important factor in causing these outbreaks.

To provide an improved vaccine, we review the development of pertussis vaccines (9). Pertussis as a distinct, highly contagious, and serious disease has been known for centuries. In the 1930s, it was the most common cause of death in children in the United States (10). Soon after the discovery of B. pertussis as the causative organism, scientists evaluated the efficacy of vaccines composed of B. pertussis suspended in rabbit blood made by T. Madsen, Serum Institute of Denmark, during an epidemic in 1929 in the Faroe Islands (11). The vaccine was administered i.m. to children and young adults. Surveillance was maintained for 2 y, and the results showed 6 deaths due to pertussis among 3,020 vaccinees and 26 among 1,027 nonvaccinees. Similar rates were obtained for mild and moderate cases. This study showed it was possible to prevent pertussis by vaccination. Soon thereafter, a similar study was conducted by L. W. Sauer at Northwestern University (Chicago, IL) (12). Eight strains of B. pertussis were grown on Bordet media made with human blood and then inactivated with phenol. The vaccines contained 6–7 × 107 organisms/mL, and 1 mL was injected s.c. three to eight times into more than 300 nonimmune children. Temperatures up to 102 °F, lasting 2 d, occurred in most recipients. Clinical data, collected over 3 y, suggested efficacy of the vaccination.

During the late 1930s, several firms in the United States and Europe prepared pertussis vaccines, but there was no information about their standardization or clinical data. Pioneers in this field, Kendrick and Eldering at the Michigan State Board of Health, described an assay using intracerebral challenge with B. pertussis of mice immunized by i.p. injection of a test vaccine (13). Standardization of this procedure by Pittman and colleagues at the National Institutes of Health revolutionized the field, because the immunogenicity of these vaccines could now be expressed in units (14, 15). Soon, manufacturers combined these cellular pertussis vaccines with diphtheria (DTx) and tetanus toxoids (TTx) adsorbed onto alum (DTPads). DTPads was recommended for routine immunization of infants and 6 y olds. These cellular vaccines significantly reduced the incidence of pertussis in young children throughout the United States and other developed countries (16). Its use, however, was associated with local reactions, fever, and seizures and was considered too toxic for adults (17) Some accused DTPads of causing CNS injury, but this was disproved (18, 19). However, the ensuing publicity resulted in the decreased use of pertussis-containing vaccines that persists to date. In addition, many criticized the intracerebral (i.c.) challenge assay as not being related to vaccine-induced immunity to pertussis. However, i.c. challenge of mice with viable B. pertussis mirrors the events in human pertussis: first, the organisms do not cause a blood or purulent infection during infection but adhere to the cilia of the bronchi during disease and to the cilia of cerebral ventricles in the assay (both respiratory and CNS cilia have a common ectodermal origin) (20). Second, only pertussis toxin (PT) antibodies, whether actively induced or passively administered, conferred protection against lethal infection in mice including the Food and Drug Administration assay (21, 22). We wonder why the pertussis vaccine is not controlled by measurement of serum neutralizing antibodies (antitoxin) as is done for DT (23). Unfortunately, there are no published regulations for the current acellular pertussis vaccine by the US Food and Drug Administration.

It was a contribution, by the same Margaret Pittman, that expanded our understanding of pertussis on a molecular level and that inspired scientists to study this disease (24). She reasoned that pertussis was a toxin-mediated disease and that the toxin was the cause of the many biologic effects ascribed to B. pertussis such as histamine sensitization factor, lymphocytosis-promoting factor, islet cell activation factor, and protective antigen. Scientists soon isolated the PT, elucidated its amino acid structure and DNA regulation, and developed mutations that preserved its immunogenicity while eliminating its toxicity (25⇓⇓–28). An acellular bicomponent vaccine containing PT and filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA), was shown to be safe and effective in Japan (29). Purification of other B. pertussis components led to several acellular licensed vaccines composed of one to five components (30, 31). The combination of purified proteins, including diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis proteins and Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate in one vaccine induced Arthus reactions in recipients of more than three injections of the combination vaccines (32, 33). Accordingly, the levels of DTx in acellular pertussis vaccine for individuals >12 y of age was lowered (Tdap), which resulted in the disappearance of the Arthus reactions (33). In individuals who did not have pertussis or were not vaccinated with pertussis-containing vaccines, one injection of Tdap failed to induce protective levels of IgG anti-PT (100 IU), and its overall effectiveness in >13 y olds was estimated to be only 53% (34). The wide resurgence of pertussis initiated calls for an improved vaccine (4⇓⇓–7, 35). However, there is no agreement about how to improve acellular vaccines that may contain one to five protein components. There is, however, agreement that pertussis toxoid (PTx) is an essential component of cellular and acellular vaccines (36). The evidence for this is as follows. (i) Low levels of anti-PT were related to susceptibility to infection with this pathogen (37, 38). A monocomponent PTx showed efficacy in a field trial in Sweden (39). This same PTx has been used in Denmark as the only pertussis vaccine for 15 y (40, 41) and its efficacy is similar to that of the multivalent vaccines, and there has been no pertussis epidemic in Denmark since 2002 in contrast to neighboring countries, where epidemics have occurred. (ii) A convalescent level of ≥100 EU (ELISA units) to PT is the only reliable method for serologic diagnosis of pertussis (42). No valid data assign protective activities to the other vaccine proteins: (i) FHA did not confer immunity against intracerebral or pulmonary challenge with B. pertussis in mice by active or passive immunization with monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies (21). (ii) FHA and pertactin antibodies, induced by infection with Bordetella parapertussis, do not confer immunity to pertussis (there were no PT antibodies) (43, 44). (iii) A cellular pertussis vaccine without FHA (Lederle Laboratories), once used for routine immunization of infants in the United States, had similar protective activity as vaccines containing FHA (45, 46). (iv) Inclusion of FHA did not confer additional protection to acellular pertussis vaccines or additional therapeutic effect to passively administered anti-PT (47, 48). (v) Neither active nor passive immunity to pertactin conferred protection to mice challenged i.c. (49). In one study, a relatively high dose of pertactin (16 µg) provided only incomplete immunity to mice challenged in the upper respiratory tract, whereas PTx conferred 100% protection at half that dose (8 µg) (50). In humans, seroepidemiologic studies showed that pertactin and FHA antibodies arose independently of pertussis infection and did not prevent pertussis (51). (vi) Japanese regulatory agencies have requirements only for FHA and PTx (52). This experience in Japan, where pertussis has almost been eradicated, indicates that pertactin is not essential for induced immunity to pertussis. (vii) Strains of B. pertussis isolated from patients with pertussis that do not express pertactin have been identified in the United States, Europe, and Japan (53⇓–55). (viii) Not commonly appreciated is that convalescence from pertussis, at any age, does not confer lifelong immunity to pertussis (56, 57). In addition, indirect data showed that addition of fimbriae to the four-component vaccine adds only a small increment of efficacy (not significant) (30). Lastly, some have proposed to add adenylate cyclase or outer membrane vesicles to this mixture, but no efficacy for these investigative vaccines has been published (58, 59).

PT antibodies induced by pertussis vaccines invoke two main actions. A primary protective action, which is indirect, inhibits the action of PT on phagocytic cells, thus allowing them to opsonize the B. pertussis (60). Similar to the effect induced by widespread immunization with DTx, this indirect effect of anti-PT accounts for the incomplete immunity on an individual basis (∼80% for both toxoids) (61, 62). Another effect of anti-PT is to reduce coughing that, in turn, decreases transmission of B. pertussis in the susceptible population (21). Because B. pertussis is an inhabitant of and a pathogen for humans only, this reduced transmission results in “herd” immunity.

From the above discussion, it follows that improvement of the current pertussis vaccine can begin with two steps: (i) removal of the nonessential vaccine components; and (ii) improving the essential component PTx by using a nondenatured, genetically detoxified mutant, one of which has been shown to be a better immunogen than the chemically modified PTx at a smaller (1/5) dose (63, 64). A third step will be discussed below.

Consistent with the observations on antiprotein antibodies, the duration of vaccine- and disease-induced IgG antiprotein wanes, so that maximal level declines about 10-fold in 2–5 y (65⇓⇓–68). Older children and adults were not immunized with cellular pertussis vaccines because of adverse reactions, leaving many nonimmune individuals (17). We quote Alison Weiss: “booster immunization of adults with acellular pertussis vaccine was not found to increase bactericidal activity over pre-immunization levels. Identifying ways to promote bactericidal immune responses might improve the efficacy of pertussis vaccines” (69). Because vaccine-induced IgG antibodies to the surface polysaccharides of Gram-negative pathogens induce a bactericidal effect and immunity, we studied the lipooligosaccharide (LOS) of B. pertussis as a potential vaccine component (70⇓–72).

A Pertussis Vaccine Designed to Induce Bactericidal Antibody

Protein conjugates of polysaccharides induce antibodies whose protective levels may last for decades even for the life of the recipient (73). The reason is that polysaccharides are composed of repeat small saccharides that are common in nature and may stimulate cross-reacting antibodies (74). Proteins, in contrast, have a complex specific structure, with very few cross-reactive structures, i.e., DT antibodies are induced only by vaccination or disease and that is the reason why most proteins, such as PTx, elicit a comparatively short duration of protective levels (3–5 y) (56, 57, 65⇓⇓–68).

LPS is both an important virulence factor and a protective antigen of Gram-negative bacteria. Protection induced by our Shigella sonnei conjugates was related to the levels of serum IgG anti–O-SP (71, 72). B. pertussis lacks an O-specific polysaccharide domain of its LPS, and is termed lipo-oligosaccharide (LOS), differing from most enterobacteriacae such as Escherichia coli and Salmonella, which have an LPS (75). The B. pertussis LOS is expressed in two forms denoted as band A and band B, distinguished by a terminal trisaccharide of band A at its nonreducing end (76, 77). Alone, B. pertussis LOS is a poor immunogen due to its low molecular weight (∼2,500 Kd) (75). Fever, usually assumed to be mediated by the LPS, is not a common finding in pertussis patients of all ages. Serum LOS antibodies are found in children who recovered from pertussis, indicating that this saccharide is expressed during disease (78). Neither cellular nor acellular vaccines regularly elicit bactericidal antibody (79⇓⇓⇓–83). Only some investigative vaccines induce bactericidal antibodies and some “naturally occurring” anti-LOSs elicit a cidal reaction with B. pertussis (80, 83).

With the goal of regularly inducing antibodies that have a direct bactericidal effect on B. pertussis, we prepared conjugates of its LOS core. We used Bordetella bronchiseptica, reported to share the B. pertussis core structure, for ease of cultivation, and bound its reducing end to BSA by oxime chemistry (84, 85). Several mutants were investigated; only conjugates of the core saccharide with a single trisaccharide at the nonreducing end, with about eight chains per protein carrier, induced high levels of bactericidal antibodies (86). Because of its availability, we used BSA but we plan to use the genetically altered PTx modified by Arg-9 to Lys and Glu-129 to Ala of the S1 peptide, as the carrier protein (23, 25) to provide both anti-PT and bactericidal antibodies. This approach is feasible because we showed that PT can serve as a carrier for pneumococcus type 14 polysaccharide (87). We expect the bivalent conjugate-induced antibodies to be fully protective and long-lived. Because B. pertussis is an inhabitant of and a pathogen for humans only, the addition of an immunogen that induces bactericidal antibodies opens the opportunity to combine high rates of immunization in infants with eradication of B. pertussis. Such a conjugate will be simple and less costly to prepare and should confer a high degree of immunity for a longer period than our current pertussis vaccines.

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: johnbennettrobbins{at}gmail.com.
  • ↵2Retired.

  • Author contributions: J.B.R., R.S., J.K.-K., J.M.K., B.T., E.V., and J.S. wrote the paper; and J.B.R. reviewed the literature.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Bordet J,
    2. Gengou O
    (1906) Le microbe de la coqueluche. Ann Inst Pasteur (Paris) 20:731–741.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    (2008) Licensure of a diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis adsorbed, inactivated poliovirus, and haemophilus B conjugate vaccine and guidance for use in infants and children. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 57(39):1079–1080.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    (2012) Updated recommendations for use of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine in adults aged 65 years and older - Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), 2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 61(25):468–470.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Fishman DN,
    2. et al.
    (2011) Jamieson F. Pertussis resurgence in Toronto, Canada: A population-based study including test-incidence feedback modeling. BMC Public Health 11:1–10.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Celentano LP,
    2. Massari M,
    3. Paramatti D,
    4. Salmaso S,
    5. Tozzi AE,
    6. EUVAC-NET Group
    (2005) Resurgence of pertussis in Europe. Pediatr Infect Dis J 24(9):761–765.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Zepp F,
    2. et al.
    (2011) Rationale for pertussis booster vaccination throughout life in Europe. Lancet Infect Dis 11(7):557–570.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Cherry JD
    (2012) Epidemic pertussis in 2012—The resurgence of a vaccine-preventable disease. N Engl J Med 367(9):785–787.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Winter K,
    2. et al.
    (2012) California pertussis epidemic, 2010. J Pediatr 161(6):1091–1096.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Pittman M
    (1991) History of the development of pertussis vaccine. Dev Biol Stand 73:13–29.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    (2002) Pertussis—United States, 1997-2000. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 51(4):73–76.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Madsen T
    (1933) Vaccination against whooping cough. JAMA 101:1878–188.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    1. Sauer LW
    (1930) Whooping cough: Results of a seven year study. J Pediatr 1930:740–749.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Kendrick PL,
    2. Eldering G,
    3. Dixon MK,
    4. Misner J
    (1947) Mouse protection tests in the study of pertussis vaccine. Am J Public Health 37(9):803–810.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Pittman M,
    2. Lieberman JE
    (1948) An analysis of the Wilson-Worcester method for determining the median effective dose of pertussis vaccine. Am J Public Health Nations Health 38(1 Pt 1):15–21.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Pittman M
    (1956) Pertussis and pertussis vaccine control. J Wash Acad Sci 46:234–242.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Centers for Disease Control (CDC)
    (1984) Pertussis—United States, 1982 and 1983. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 33(40):573–575.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Linneman CC Jr.,
    2. Ramundo N,
    3. Perlstein PH,
    4. Minton D,
    5. Englander GS
    (1977) Use of pertussis vaccine in an epidemic involving hospital staff. Lancet 2:540–543.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Stewart GT
    (1977) Vaccination against whooping-cough. Efficacy versus risks. Lancet 1(8005):234–237.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Cherry JD
    (1990) ‘Pertussis vaccine encephalopathy’: It is time to recognize it as the myth that it is. JAMA 263(12):1679–1680.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Iida T,
    2. Kusano N,
    3. Yamamoto A,
    4. Konosu M
    (1966) An immunofluorescence study of the action of antibody in experimental intracerebral infection of mice with Bordetella pertussis. J Pathol Bacteriol 92(2):359–367.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Sato H,
    2. Sato Y,
    3. Ohishi I
    (1991) Comparison of pertussis toxin (PT)-neutralizing activities and mouse-protective activities of anti-PT mouse monoclonal antibodies. Infect Immun 59(10):3832–3835.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Watanabe M,
    2. et al.
    (2002) Efficacy of pertussis components in an acellular vaccine, as assessed in a murine model of respiratory infection and a murine intracerebral challenge model. Vaccine 20(9-10):1429–1434.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Robbins JB,
    2. Schneerson R,
    3. Trollfors B,
    4. Taranger J,
    5. Lagergård T
    (1998) Standardization of acellular pertussis vaccine by assay of serum neutralizing antibodies to pertussis toxin (antitoxin): Analogy with diphtheria toxoid. Dev Biol Stand 95:155–158.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Pittman M
    (1979) Pertussis toxin: The cause of the harmful effects and prolonged immunity of whooping cough. A hypothesis. Rev Infect Dis 1(3):401–412.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Locht C,
    2. Keith JM
    (1986) Pertussis toxin gene: Nucleotide sequence and genetic organization. Science 232(4755):1258–1264.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Nicosia A,
    2. et al.
    (1986) Cloning and sequencing of the pertussis toxin genes: Operon structure and gene duplication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83(13):4631–4635.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Burnette WN,
    2. Cieplak W,
    3. Mar VL,
    4. Kaljot KT,
    5. Sato H,
    6. Keith JM
    (1988) Pertussis toxin S1 mutant with reduced enzyme activity and a conserved protective epitope. Science 242(4875):72–74.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Nencioni L, et al. (1990) Characterization of genetically inactivated pertussis toxin mutants: Candidates for a new vaccine against whooping cough. Infect Immun 58(5):1308–1315.
  29. ↵
    1. Sato Y,
    2. Kimura M,
    3. Fukumi H
    (1984) Development of a pertussis component vaccine in Japan. Lancet 1(8369):122–126.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Olin P,
    2. Rasmussen F,
    3. Gustafsson L,
    4. Hallander HO,
    5. Heijbel H,
    6. Ad Hoc Group for the Study of Pertussis Vaccines
    (1997) Randomised controlled trial of two-component, three-component, and five-component acellular pertussis vaccines compared with whole-cell pertussis vaccine. Lancet 350(9091):1569–1577.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Liese JG,
    2. et al.,
    3. Munich Vaccine Study Group
    (2001) Safety and immunogenicity of Biken acellular pertussis vaccine in combination with diphtheria and tetanus toxoid as a fifth dose at four to six years of age. Pediatr Infect Dis J 20(10):981–988.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Halperin SA,
    2. et al.
    (2003) Nature, evolution, and appraisal of adverse events and antibody response associated with the fifth consecutive dose of a five-component acellular pertussis-based combination vaccine. Vaccine 21(19-20):2298–2306.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Dagan R,
    2. et al.
    (1999) Reactogenicity and immunogenicity of reduced antigen content diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccines as a booster in 4-7-year-old children primed with diphtheria-tetanus-whole cell pertussis vaccine before 2 years of age. Vaccine 17(20-21):2620–2627.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Knuf M,
    2. et al.
    (2006) Immunogenicity of a single dose of reduced-antigen acellular pertussis vaccine in a non-vaccinated adolescent population. Vaccine 24(12):2043–2048.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Klein NP,
    2. Bartlett J,
    3. Rowhani-Rahbar A,
    4. Fireman B,
    5. Baxter R
    (2012) Waning protection after fifth dose of acellular pertussis vaccine in children. N Engl J Med 367(11):1012–1019.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Yeh SH
    (2003) Pertussis: Persistent pathogen, imperfect vaccines. Expert Rev Vaccines 2(1):113–127.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Robbins JB,
    2. et al.
    (2009) Pertussis vaccine: A critique. Pediatr Infect Dis J 28(3):237–241.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Storsaeter J,
    2. Hallander HO,
    3. Gustafsson L,
    4. Olin P
    (2003) Low levels of antipertussis antibodies plus lack of history of pertussis correlate with susceptibility after household exposure to Bordetella pertussis. Vaccine 21(25-26):3542–3549.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Trollfors B,
    2. et al.
    (1995) A placebo-controlled trial of a pertussis-toxoid vaccine. N Engl J Med 333(16):1045–1050.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Hviid A,
    2. Stellfeld M,
    3. Andersen PH,
    4. Wohlfahrt J,
    5. Melbye M
    (2004) Impact of routine vaccination with a pertussis toxoid vaccine in Denmark. Vaccine 22(27-28):3530–3534.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Thierry-Cartensen B,
    2. et al.
    (2013) Experience with monocomponent acellular pertussis combination vaccines for infants, children, adolescents and adults—A review of safety, immunogenicity, efficacy and effectiveness studies and 15 years of field experience. Vaccine 31(45):5178–5191.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. de Melker HE,
    2. et al.
    (2000) Specificity and sensitivity of high levels of immunoglobulin G antibodies against pertussis toxin in a single serum sample for diagnosis of infection with Bordetella pertussis. J Clin Microbiol 38(2):800–806.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    1. Taranger J,
    2. Trollfors B
    Lagergård T, Zackrisson G (1994). Parapertussis infection followed by pertussis infection. Lancet 334(8938):1703.
  44. ↵
    1. Bergfors E,
    2. et al.
    (1999) Parapertussis and pertussis: Differences and similarities in incidence, clinical course, and antibody responses. Int J Infect Dis 3(3):140–146.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Edwards K,
    2. et al.
    (1995) Comparison of 13 acellular pertussis vaccines: Overview and serologic response. Pediatrics 96(3 Pt 2):548–557.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    1. Heininger U,
    2. et al.,
    3. Pertussis Vaccine Study Group
    (1998) Comparative efficacy of the Lederle/Takeda acellular pertussis component DTP (DTaP) vaccine and Lederle whole-cell component DTP vaccine in German children after household exposure. Pediatrics 102(3 Pt 1):546–553.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    1. Blackwelder WC,
    2. Storsaeter J,
    3. Olin P,
    4. Hallander HO
    (1991) Acellular pertussis vaccines. Efficacy and evaluation of clinical case definitions. Am J Dis Child 145(11):1285–1289.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Cherry JD,
    2. Gornbein J,
    3. Heininger U,
    4. Stehr K
    (1998) A search for serologic correlates of immunity to Bordetella pertussis cough illnesses. Vaccine 16(20):1901–1906.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Charles I,
    2. et al.
    (1993) Expression of P.69/pertactin from Bordetella pertussis in a baculovirus/insect cell expression system: Protective properties of the recombinant protein. Res Microbiol 144(9):681–690.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Shahin RD,
    2. Brennan MJ,
    3. Li ZM,
    4. Meade BD,
    5. Manclark CR
    (1990) Characterization of the protective capacity and immunogenicity of the 69-kD outer membrane protein of Bordetella pertussis. J Exp Med 171(1):63–73.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    1. Isacson J,
    2. Trollfors B,
    3. Taranger J,
    4. Lagergård T
    (1995) Acquisition of IgG serum antibodies against two Bordetella antigens (filamentous hemagglutinin and pertactin) in children with no symptoms of pertussis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 14(6):517–521.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Kuno-Sakai H,
    2. Kimura M,
    3. Watanabe H
    (2004) Verification of components of acellular pertussis vaccines that have been distributed solely, been in routine use for the last two decades and contributed greatly to control of pertussis in Japan. Biologicals 32(1):29–35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Otsuka N,
    2. et al.
    (2012) Prevalence and genetic characterization of pertactin-deficient Bordetella pertussis in Japan. PLoS ONE 7(2):e31985.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Queenan AM,
    2. Cassiday PK,
    3. Evangelista A
    (2013) Pertactin-negative variants of Bordetella pertussis in the United States. N Engl J Med 368(6):583–584.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Bodilis H,
    2. Guiso N
    (2013) Virulence of pertactin-negative Bordetella pertussis isolates from infants, France. Emerg Infect Dis 19(3):471–474.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Crossley K,
    2. Irvine P,
    3. Warren JB,
    4. Lee BK,
    5. Mead K
    (1979) Tetanus and diphtheria immunity in urban Minnesota adults. JAMA 242(21):2298–2300.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    1. Jenkinson D
    (1988) Duration of effectiveness of pertussis vaccine: Evidence from a 10 year community study. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 296(6622):612–614.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. ↵
    1. Gordon YC,
    2. et al.
    (2006) Effect of different forms of adenylate cyclase toxin on Bordetella pertussis on protection afforded by an acellular pertussis vaccine in a murine model. Infect Immun 74:6799–6805.
    OpenUrl
  59. ↵
    1. Roberts R,
    2. et al.
    (2008) Outer membrane vesicles as acellular vaccine against pertussis. Vaccine 26(36):4639–4646.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    1. Meade BD,
    2. Kind PD,
    3. Ewell JB,
    4. McGrath PP,
    5. Manclark CR
    (1984) In vitro inhibition of murine macrophage migration by Bordetella pertussis lymphocytosis-promoting factor. Infect Immun 45(3):718–725.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  61. ↵
    1. Schneerson R,
    2. Robbins JB,
    3. Taranger J,
    4. Lagergård T,
    5. Trollfors B
    (1996) A toxoid vaccine for pertussis as well as for diphtheria? Lancet 348(9037):1289–1292.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    1. Trollfors B,
    2. et al.
    (1998) Immunization of children with pertussis toxoid decreases spread of pertussis within the family. Pediatr Infect Dis J 17(3):196–199.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. ↵
    1. Rappuoli R
    (1999) The vaccine containing recombinant pertussis toxin induces early and long-lasting immunity. Biologicals 27(2):98–102.
    OpenUrl
  64. ↵
    1. Robbins JB,
    2. et al.
    (2007) The rise in pertussis cases urges replacement of chemically-inactivated with genetically-inactivated toxoid for DTP. Vaccine 25(15):2811–2816.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. ↵
    1. Taranger J,
    2. et al.
    (2001) Mass vaccination of children with pertussis toxoid—decreased incidence in both vaccinated and nonvaccinated persons. Clin Infect Dis 33(7):1004–1010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  66. ↵
    1. Le T,
    2. et al.,
    3. APERT Study
    (2004) Immune responses and antibody decay after immunization of adolescents and adults with an acellular pertussis vaccine: The APERT Study. J Infect Dis 190(3):535–544.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  67. ↵
    1. Trollfors B,
    2. Dotevall L,
    3. Sundh V,
    4. Welinder-Olsson C
    (2011) Pertussis after end of a mass vaccination project—End of the “vaccination honey-moon” Vaccine 29(13):2444–2450.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. ↵
    1. Heininger U,
    2. Cherry JD,
    3. Stehr K
    (2004) Serologic response and antibody-titer decay in adults with pertussis. Clin Infect Dis 38(4):591–594.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  69. ↵
    1. Weiss AA,
    2. et al.
    (2004) Acellular pertussis vaccines and complement killing of Bordetella pertussis. Infect Immun 72(12):7346–7351.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  70. ↵
    1. Watson DC,
    2. Robbins JB,
    3. Szu SC
    (1992) Protection of mice against Salmonella typhimurium with an O-specific polysaccharide-protein conjugate vaccine. Infect Immun 60(11):4679–4686.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  71. ↵
    1. Cohen D,
    2. et al.
    (1997) Double-blind vaccine-controlled randomised efficacy trial of an investigational Shigella sonnei conjugate vaccine in young adults. Lancet 349(9046):155–159.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  72. ↵
    1. Passwell JH,
    2. et al.,
    3. Israeli Shigella Study Group
    (2010) Age-related efficacy of Shigella O-specific polysaccharide conjugates in 1-4-year-old Israeli children. Vaccine 28(10):2231–2235.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. ↵
    1. Claesson BA,
    2. et al.
    (2005) Antibodies against Haemophilus influenzae type b capsular polysaccharide and tetanus toxoid before and after a booster dose of the carrier protein nine years after primary vaccination with a protein conjugate vaccine. Pediatr Infect Dis J 24(5):463–464.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. ↵
    1. Myerowitz RL,
    2. Gordon RE,
    3. Robbins JB
    (1973) Polysaccharides of the genus Bacillus cross-reactive with the capsular polysaccharides of Diplococcus pneumoniae type 3, Haemophilus influenzae type b, and Neisseria meningitidis group A. Infect Immun 8(6):896–900.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  75. ↵
    1. Caroff M,
    2. et al.
    (2001) Structural variability and originality of the Bordetella endotoxins. J Endotoxin Res 7(1):63–68.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  76. ↵
    1. Peppler MS
    (1984) Two physically and serologically distinct lipopolysaccharide profiles in strains of Bordetella pertussis and their phenotype variants. Infect Immun 43(1):224–232.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  77. ↵
    1. Preston A,
    2. et al.
    (2006) Complete structures of Bordetella bronchiseptica and Bordetella parapertussis lipopolysaccharides. J Biol Chem 281(26):18135–18144.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  78. ↵
    1. Trollfors B,
    2. et al.
    (2001) Serum immunoglobulin G antibody responses to Bordetella pertussis lipooligosaccharide and B. parapertussis lipopolysaccharide in children with pertussis and parapertussis. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 8(5):1015–1017.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  79. ↵
    1. Weingart CL,
    2. Keitel WA,
    3. Edwards KM,
    4. Weiss AA
    (2000) Characterization of bactericidal immune responses following vaccination with acellular pertussis vaccines in adults. Infect Immun 68(12):7175–7179.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  80. ↵
    1. Mountzouros KT,
    2. Kimura A,
    3. Cowell JL
    (1992) A bactericidal monoclonal antibody specific for the lipooligosaccharide of Bordetella pertussis reduces colonization of the respiratory tract of mice after aerosol infection with B. pertussis. Infect Immun 60(12):5316–5318.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  81. ↵
    1. Archambault D,
    2. Rondeau P,
    3. Martin D,
    4. Broudeur BR
    (1991) Characterization and comparative bactericidal activity of monoclonal antibodies to Bordetella pertussis lipooligosaccharide A. J Gen Micro 137(4):905–911.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  82. ↵
    1. Shahin RD,
    2. Hamel J,
    3. Leef MF,
    4. Brodeur BR
    (1994) Analysis of protective and nonprotective monoclonal antibodies specific for Bordetella pertussis lipooligosaccharide. Infect Immun 62(2):722–725.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  83. ↵
    1. Weiss AA,
    2. Mobberley PS,
    3. Fernandez RC,
    4. Mink CM
    (1999) Characterization of human bactericidal antibodies to Bordetella pertussis. Infect Immun 67(3):1424–1431.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  84. ↵
    1. Kubler-Kielb J,
    2. Pozsgay V
    (2005) A new method for conjugation of carbohydrates to proteins using an aminooxy-thiol heterobifunctional linker. J Org Chem 70(17):6987–6990.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  85. ↵
    1. Kubler-Kielb J,
    2. et al.
    (2008) Saccharide/protein conjugate vaccines for Bordetella species: Preparation of saccharide, development of new conjugation procedures, and physico-chemical and immunological characterization of the conjugates. Vaccine 26(29-30):3587–3593.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  86. ↵
    1. Kubler-Kielb J,
    2. et al.
    (2011) Oligosaccharide conjugates of Bordetella pertussis and bronchiseptica induce bactericidal antibodies, an addition to pertussis vaccine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108(10):4087–4092.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  87. ↵
    1. Schneerson R,
    2. et al.
    (1992) Synthesis of a conjugate vaccine composed of pneumococcus type 14 capsular polysaccharide bound to pertussis toxin. Infect Immun 60(9):3528–3532.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Toward a new vaccine for pertussis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Toward a new vaccine for pertussis
John B. Robbins, Rachel Schneerson, Joanna Kubler-Kielb, Jerry M. Keith, Birger Trollfors, Evgeny Vinogradov, Joseph Shiloach
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Mar 2014, 111 (9) 3213-3216; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1324149111

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Toward a new vaccine for pertussis
John B. Robbins, Rachel Schneerson, Joanna Kubler-Kielb, Jerry M. Keith, Birger Trollfors, Evgeny Vinogradov, Joseph Shiloach
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Mar 2014, 111 (9) 3213-3216; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1324149111
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Article Classifications

  • Biological Sciences
  • Medical Sciences
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 111 (9)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • A Pertussis Vaccine Designed to Induce Bactericidal Antibody
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Indus River.
Lockdowns and snow melt in South Asia
Relatively clean snow and ice in the Indus River Basin during the COVID-19 pandemic may have reduced meltwater in 2020, compared with the 20-year average.
Image credit: Pixabay/Abdullah_Shakoor.
Water ice clouds on modern Mars.
Greenhouse warming of early Mars
Atmospheric and climate conditions could have created a cloud greenhouse effect to warm Mars and support liquid surface water.
Image credit: NASA/JPL/MSSS.
Researchers report a safety guideline to limit airborne transmission of COVID-19.
Risk of indoor aerosol transmission
Researchers report a safety guideline to limit airborne transmission of COVID-19 that goes beyond the six-foot social distancing guideline.
Image credit: Pixabay/Matryx.
Aerial view of modern wastewater treatment plants with aeration tanks and clarification tanks.
News Feature: Microbes for better sewage treatment
Going beyond conventional approaches, researchers are using carefully cultured bacterial communities to improve sewage treatment.
Image credit: Shutterstock/chekart.
Illustration of colorful carbon nanotube-like figure with a meadow at the center.
Opinion: We can use carbon to decarbonize—and get hydrogen for free
What if we stopped using oil and gas as fuels and instead use them as sources of both hydrogen for fuel and carbon for useful, pervasive materials?
Nanotube image credit: Shutterstock/Gl0ck; Field image credit: Shutterstock/Evgeny Karandaev.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Cozzarelli Prize
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490. PNAS is a partner of CHORUS, COPE, CrossRef, ORCID, and Research4Life.