Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology
Reply

Reply to Brush et al.: Wake-up call for crop conservation science

George A. Dyer, Alejandro López-Feldman, Antonio Yúnez-Naude, J. Edward Taylor, and Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra
PNAS January 6, 2015 112 (1) E2; first published December 29, 2014; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1422645112
George A. Dyer
aDesarrollo y Alimentación Sustentable, A.C., Mexico 04318, D.F., Mexico;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: georgie.dyer@gmail.com
Alejandro López-Feldman
bDivisión de Economía, Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas, Mexico 01210 D.F., Mexico;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Antonio Yúnez-Naude
aDesarrollo y Alimentación Sustentable, A.C., Mexico 04318, D.F., Mexico;
cCentro de Estudios Económicos, El Colegio de México, Mexico 10740, D.F., Mexico; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Edward Taylor
dDepartment of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Giannini Foundation of Agricultural Economics, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra
eDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

This article has a Letter. Please see:

  • Assessing maize genetic erosion - December 29, 2014

See related content:

  • Genetic erosion of maize
    - Sep 02, 2014
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

We strongly concur with Brush et al. (1) regarding the urgency for a new generation of studies (2), but reject claims that our findings are unsupported and our comparisons false, a misperception that could delay adequate academic and policy responses. First, spurious or not, it is not our interpretation that we put to the test but that of influential scholars who, notwithstanding studies’ design and methodological differences, conclude that “there is increasing evidence that small-scale farmers throughout the world, and especially in areas of crop domestication and diversity, continue to maintain a diverse set of crop varieties” (3) and “after thirty years of crop collection and research … the concept of genetic erosion remains more a presumption of what is likely to occur than a demonstrated fact” (4).

Our analysis supports the previous interpretation of trends in case-study data (figure 1A in ref. 5): it is significant that a single variable—time—explains 12% of variance (across studies and localities) for the highly multifactorial outcome of location-specific crop management (2), but analysis of Mexico National Household Survey’s (ENHRUM) nationally representative, matched longitudinal data belies it (figure 1B in ref. 5). Brush et al. (1) provide no clear reason for suspecting errors to differ between survey rounds, the main pillar of their reasoning. So why should we suspect? Both rounds used the same instruments, farmer sample, and enumerator-training procedures. The diversity losses documented are large and statistically significant (P < 0.001). The other pillar of Brush et al.’s (1) reasoning, the conjecture that ENHRUM data underestimate diversity, is also unfounded. Our estimates are at least as high as Brush and coworkers for specific areas on similar or prior dates (table S1 in ref. 5). Significantly, even after declines, the estimates are noticeably higher for all southeast highlands than Brush and coworkers for highland Chiapas, where diversity is presumed highest in Mexico. However, the range of locality averages is wider for ENHRUM than for all previous studies combined. ENHRUM-based estimates of various other population parameters also are comparable to Brush and coworkers but of far greater scope (2).

Certainly, households could in principle regain discarded varieties via seed exchange, but this does not appear to be happening. In fact, reduced richness has been accompanied by farmers turning to alternative seed sources. Moreover, mathematical analysis of crop-metapopulation dynamics shows a complex relationship between seed exchange and genetic diversity that depends on a number of additional factors (6). The question no longer is whether genetic erosion remains a presumption but how to respond to it, particularly as the climate changes.

We concur with Brush et al. (1) in concluding that this question requires a new, inherently cross-disciplinary research agenda. Such an approach will need to: (i) map diversity measures using named varieties to measure genetic outcomes; (ii) monitor diversity using longitudinal, rather than cross-sectional, methods; (iii) account for markets and other determinants of on-farm diversity; (iv) model the linkages between incentives, agents’ decisions, metapopulation dynamics, and diversity at various scales; and (v) predict the consequences of these interactions for rural areas in the face of changing environments. The rapid loss of diversity documented in our study underlines the urgency of implementing this agenda.

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: georgie.dyer{at}gmail.com.
  • Author contributions: G.A.D., A.L.-F., A.Y.-N., J.E.T., and J.R.-I. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

View Abstract

References

  1. ↵
    1. Brush SB, et al.
    (2015) Assessing maize genetic erosion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:E1
    .
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Dyer GA,
    2. López-Feldman A
    (2013) Inexplicable or simply unexplained? The management of maize seed in Mexico. PLoS ONE 8(6):e68320
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Maxted N,
    2. Ford-Lloyd BF,
    3. Hawkes JG
    1. Bellon MR,
    2. Pham J-L,
    3. Jackson MT
    (1997) in Plant Genetic Conservation: The in Situ Approach, eds Maxted N, Ford-Lloyd BF, Hawkes JG (Chapman and Hall, London)
    .
  4. ↵
    1. Brush SB
    (2004) Farmers’ Bounty: Locating Crop Diversity in the Contemporary World (Yale Univ Press, New Haven, CT)
    .
  5. ↵
    1. Dyer GA,
    2. López-Feldman A,
    3. Yúnez-Naude A,
    4. Taylor JE
    (2014) Genetic erosion in maize’s center of origin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(39):14094–14099
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. van Heerwaarden J,
    2. van Eeuwijk FA,
    3. Ross-Ibarra J
    (2010) Genetic diversity in a crop metapopulation. Heredity (Edinb) 104(1):28–39
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reply to Brush et al.: Wake-up call for crop conservation science
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Wake-up call for crop conservation science
George A. Dyer, Alejandro López-Feldman, Antonio Yúnez-Naude, J. Edward Taylor, Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Jan 2015, 112 (1) E2; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1422645112

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Wake-up call for crop conservation science
George A. Dyer, Alejandro López-Feldman, Antonio Yúnez-Naude, J. Edward Taylor, Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Jan 2015, 112 (1) E2; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1422645112
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 112 (1)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Article Classifications

  • Biological Sciences
  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Social Sciences
  • Sustainability Science

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Abstract depiction of a guitar and musical note
Science & Culture: At the nexus of music and medicine, some see disease treatments
Although the evidence is still limited, a growing body of research suggests music may have beneficial effects for diseases such as Parkinson’s.
Image credit: Shutterstock/agsandrew.
Large piece of gold
News Feature: Tracing gold's cosmic origins
Astronomers thought they’d finally figured out where gold and other heavy elements in the universe came from. In light of recent results, they’re not so sure.
Image credit: Science Source/Tom McHugh.
Dancers in red dresses
Journal Club: Friends appear to share patterns of brain activity
Researchers are still trying to understand what causes this strong correlation between neural and social networks.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Yeongsik Im.
Yellow emoticons
Learning the language of facial expressions
Aleix Martinez explains why facial expressions often are not accurate indicators of emotion.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Goats standing in a pin
Transplantation of sperm-producing stem cells
CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing can improve the effectiveness of spermatogonial stem cell transplantation in mice and livestock, a study finds.
Image credit: Jon M. Oatley.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490