Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
Biological Sciences

The advent of animals: The view from the Ediacaran

Mary L. Droser and James G. Gehling
  1. aDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521;
  2. bSouth Australia Museum, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; and
  3. cUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS April 21, 2015 112 (16) 4865-4870; first published April 20, 2015; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1403669112
Mary L. Droser
aDepartment of Earth Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Mary.Droser@UCR.EDU
James G. Gehling
bSouth Australia Museum, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; and
cUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  1. Edited by Neil H. Shubin, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, and approved December 9, 2014 (received for review April 15, 2014)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Significance

Patterns of evolution, origination, and extinction of early animal life on this planet are largely interpreted from fossils of the soft-bodied Ediacara Biota, Earth’s earliest multicellular communities preserved globally. The record of these organisms predates the well-known Cambrian Explosion by nearly 40 million years and provides critical information concerning early experimentation with complex life-forms on Earth. Here we show that, although in appearance, these organisms look very strange and unfamiliar, many of them may have had a biology and/or ecology similar to animals today, and some were most certainly bilaterians, cnidarians, and poriferans.

Abstract

Patterns of origination and evolution of early complex life on this planet are largely interpreted from the fossils of the Precambrian soft-bodied Ediacara Biota. These fossils occur globally and represent a diverse suite of organisms living in marine environments. Although these exceptionally preserved fossil assemblages are typically difficult to reconcile with modern phyla, examination of the morphology, ecology, and taphonomy of these taxa provides keys to their relationships with modern taxa. Within the more than 30 million y range of the Ediacara Biota, fossils of these multicellular organisms demonstrate the advent of mobility, heterotrophy by multicellular animals, skeletonization, sexual reproduction, and the assembly of complex ecosystems, all of which are attributes of modern animals. This approach to these fossils, without the constraint of attempting phylogenetic reconstructions, provides a mechanism for comparing these taxa with both living and extinct animals.

  • Ediacara
  • animals
  • Ediacaran
  • South Australia
  • fossils

Fossils of the Ediacara Biota consisting of macroscopic, morphologically diverse and generally soft-bodied organisms (1) occur globally in strata spanning 575–541 Mya, marking the end of the Precambrian (2). The record of these organisms predates the well-known Cambrian Explosion by nearly 40 million y and provides critical information concerning evolutionary innovations in early complex multicellular life forms on Earth. However, their phylogenetic affinities and their relationship to Cambrian shelly and nonbiomineralized biotas, and thus their overall place in animal evolution on this planet (1), remain poorly constrained. Indeed, most are classified only to the genus and species level. The apparent discontinuity between the Precambrian and the Cambrian fossil record is largely based on the absence of skeletal hard parts until the very end of the Ediacaran period and the lack of Cambrian-type constructional morphologies among the Ediacara biota. With rare exceptions (3⇓⇓–6), fossils of the Ediacara biota are not found in Cambrian strata, and those that are reported are not typical Ediacara morphologies. For lack of a strong alternative, much of the biota is, thus, commonly interpreted to have gone extinct by the end of the Ediacaran period (2, 7). A few Ediacaran fossils have been interpreted as stem group metazoans, but the Cambrian period marks the unequivocal appearance of most major phyla.

Historically, the majority of Ediacara fossils were interpreted as members of modern animal phyla. Radially symmetrical and sea-pen-like forms have generally been assigned to the Cnidaria, and segmented forms with generally bilateral symmetry have been associated with annelids and arthropods (e.g., refs. 8 and 9). However, the challenges of finding unequivocal morphologic characters linking the majority of these fossils to modern phyla, as well as their unusual style of preservation as casts and molds in medium-grained sandstone, prompted suggestions of a wide range of alternative phylogenetic affinities, ranging from an extinct kingdom of “Vendobionts” (10) to prokaryotic colonies (11), protists (12), lichens (13), and fungi (14). The lack of forms with clear morphologic ties to even Cambrian fauna further complicates this issue. Lacking clear relationships to modern taxa, recently, a novel classification of these taxa based on morphologic similarities and differences among just the Ediacara fossils has led to the interpretation of at least six, and possibly nine, clades (1, 15). This provides testable hypotheses for relationships within the Ediacara Biota and, importantly, reveals the morphologic disparity of these taxa.

However, although fossils of the Ediacara Biota are not easily classified with modern taxa, they nonetheless provide the record of early animals. One of the primary issues is that they are soft-bodied and preserved in a manner that is, in many cases, unique to the Ediacaran. An alternative venue for providing insight into these organisms and the manner in which they fit into early animal evolution is offered by examination of the paleoecology, morphology, and taphonomy of fossils of the Ediacara Biota. In this article, we review the framework of the fossils of the Ediacara Biota and discuss some of the new evidence that demonstrates how these taxa fit into the record of early metazoan evolution without the constraints of attempting phylogenetic reconstructions.

The Temporal and Spatial Record

Fossils of the Ediacara biota occur at 40 localities worldwide, with four particularly good localities; namely, southeastern Newfoundland, the Flinders Ranges of South Australia, the White Sea Region of Russia, and Namibia (2, 16). The Ediacara fossil assemblages have traditionally been demarcated as three successive assemblages: the Avalon, the White Sea, and the Nama, which have been interpreted as a reflection of evolutionary controls, as evidenced by the radiometric ages of several key localities (2). However, there are also strong secondary preservational (17, 18) and paleoenvironmental controls (19, 20).

What is apparent is that the older Avalon Assemblage contains a distinct assemblage of taxa that exhibit only a few broad morphologic [e.g., rangeomorphs and arboreomorphs (cf. 21)] types. Particularly striking are the common fractal-like self-similar branching rangeomorph forms with surface area/volume ratios, which are comparable to modern osmotrophic bacteria. Although this feeding type is restricted to these bacteria in the modern era, these self-similar growths may have represented a strategy for overcoming physiologic constraints that typically make osmotrophy prohibitive for macroscopic life forms (22). Further, these early unusual and distinct macroorganisms may have been important in cycling dissolved organic carbon that may have been abundant in the Ediacaran times (22).

Elements of the Avalon Assemblage persisted (19, 21), but there are major increases in biologic and ecologic complexity following in the wake of the appearance of the older Avalon Assemblage that more strongly relate to animals as we understand them. The younger, “second wave” of the Ediacara Biota comprising the White Sea and Nama assemblages includes a wide range of new taxa (Fig. 1) (2, 21) that exhibit pronounced biologic and ecologic innovation, as evidenced by dramatic increases in body plans and ecospace use; it is a radiation in its own right. Notable aspects of this radiation include dramatic increases in mobility (18); the appearance of undisputed bilaterians, such as burrowing organisms and stem-group mollusks (e.g., refs. 23 and 24); the advent of sexual reproduction (25); the appearance of the first biomineralizers (26, 27); and the advent of active heterotrophy by multicellular organisms (24, 28⇓–30, 31).

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Common Ediacara biota fossils from the Ediacara Member, Rawnsley Quartzite, Flinders Ranges, South Australia. (A) Dickinsonia costata with precontraction outline. (B) Funisia dorothea preserved as body casts and external molds where casts have been lost. (C) Two specimens of Parvancorina minchami. (D) Kimberella quadrata. (E) Multilayered sandstone case of Bradgatia sp. (F) Sandstone cast of scratch traces, Kimberichnus teruzzii, produced by K. quadrata. (G) Spriggina floundersi. (H) Internal cast of three walls of Pteridinium simplex. (I) Helminthoidichnites isp., groove and levee traces preserved on a bed base. Specimens D and G are from the Ediacara Conservation Park; other specimens are from the Nilpena Heritage Site. (Scale bar: 1 cm.)

Moreover, this diversification in macrofauna body plans and ecologies was accompanied by a diversification in organically bound microbial substrates (microbial mats) recorded in the form of extensive sedimentary textures both physically and biologically mediated. These textured organic surfaces (TOS) are diverse patterned assemblages of structures that partially or completely cover bedding surfaces. Lacking autonomous taxonomic traits, they nonetheless possess discrete, repeating characters (11, 32). The constituent organisms may have been members of a prokaryotic, microbial community. However, it is likely that they were eukaryotic forms (32) and that certain large and multicomponent TOS may actually consist of assemblages of multicellular body fossils (25, 32). Regardless of phylogenetic affinity, TOS played a distinctive role in Ediacara seafloor ecology, both as members of Ediacara communities and likely as preservational mediators (17).

Although TOS are known from Avalon fossil assemblages (33), they achieved unprecedented abundance, morphologic diversity, and complexity as part of the second wave radiation (32). Many of the new body and trace fossil taxa characteristic of second wave assemblages occur in intimate association with TOS and appear to represent matground-based, heterotrophic lifestyles.

Environments of the Ediacara Biota

There are abundant data and general consensus that all the deposits that bear Ediacara fossils are marine in origin (19, 34). Although a terrestrial origin was recently proposed (35), this hypothesis has been rigorously tested and is not consistent with any of the sedimentologic data (31, 34, 36⇓⇓⇓–40). Fossils of the Ediacara Biota are indeed preserved in a variety of marine environments (2), from outer shelf and slope settings in volcanic sediments of forearc basins of the Avalon Terrane (41, 42) to prograding carbonate platforms such as southern China (43, 44) and shallow marine prograding siliciclastic environments of the east European Platform (19, 20, 45, 46). Burial events enabled samples of benthic communities to be conserved that included sessile body fossils and trace fossils. However, these snapshots also include elements of the history of each surface, beginning with recruitment of benthic taxa (18, 25), ambient currents and wave events, ecologic succession (47), degradation of organisms, and evidence of current deformation and loss of sessile frondous forms in the final burial event (48, 49).

Within each Ediacaran assemblage there are considerable differences in the biotic composition, depending on wave energy, the sedimentary substrate, and the depth of benthic communities (19, 20). As a consequence, the most useful field exposures are those in which whole bedding surfaces can be exposed and studied from differing paleoenvironmental settings within a region, particularly in field sites where multiple specimens and surfaces can be excavated and studied, such as the coastal exposure in eastern Newfoundland, the White Sea region of northwestern Russia, the Nilpena site in the Flinders Ranges of South Australia, and the Aar Farm site in southern Namibia.

Heterogeneity of the Ediacaran Seafloor: An Example from the Ediacaran of South Australia

One of the defining characteristics of the Ediacara Biota fossils is that they are typically preserved in situ. As a result, extensive bedding planes preserve individual communities as accurately as is possible in the fossil record. The Flinders Ranges region of South Australia contains one of the best-exposed and most complete successions of Neoproterozoic to early Paleozoic rocks in the world and includes the type section for the Ediacaran Period. Ediacara fossils occur within the Ediacara Member of the Rawnsley Quartzite, preserved within a succession of shallow marine and deltaic facies and representing common components of the White Sea Assemblage.

Well-known fossils of the Ediacara Member, including Dickinsonia (Fig. 1A), Kimberella (Fig. 1D), Parvancorina (Fig. 1C), Spriggina (Fig. 1G), and other taxa, occur abundantly on the base of thin-bedded rippled quartz sandstones representing deposition in shallow marine settings between fair-weather and storm wave base. The rich fossil assemblages of this wave-base sand facies represent benthic communities typically smothered by sand deposited by waning storm surges. Fossils are also preserved on the base of the beds of the sheet-sand facies, where fluidized sand smothered benthic communities in deeper water, well below wave base.

Excavation of 28 fossiliferous beds 4–25 m2 in area within these two facies demonstrates marked heterogeneity in both abundance and diversity between beds (Fig. 2). Within each facies, successions of beds of nearly identical sedimentology suggest the possibility there was “community-scale” differentiation of taxa in the Ediacara ecosystem, where taxa were responding to small-scale changes in environmental conditions, resulting in a patchy distribution of taxa. These bedding plane data provide an unusually good opportunity to examine abundance diversity relationships, as time-averaging can be assumed to be as minimal as possible. Rarefied generic diversity curves indicate considerable variation between beds, but overall, the wave-base facies has a greater diversity overall than the sheet-sands facies (Fig. S1). Individual beds of the Ediacara Member exhibit a wide range of evenness values (Fig. S2). Although beds with low evenness and high dominance are not rare, there are beds with evenness values on par with those of the Phanerozoic. Furthermore, although these data are not similarly collected, the results are consistent with the suggestion of Powell and Kowalewski (50) that evenness increases through time (Fig. S2). In most Ediacaran cases, the same taxa are present on most of the beds, but it is the varying abundances of each that characterize these assemblages. For example, Dickinsonia and the frond holdfast Aspidella both occur on nearly all of the beds, but in some cases, Dickinsonia dominates beds and in others, Aspidella dominates, indicating the presence of abundant frondose organisms.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

The relative abundance of different fossils on the excavated beds from South Australia. The total number of fossils found on the bed is given in parentheses after the bed name. All the beds shown, with the exception of the beds represented by the four right columns, represent deposition between fair-weather and storm wave base [the wave-base sand facies of Gehling and Droser (19)]. The four beds on the right are within the sheet-flow sand facies. The body fossil Funisia is preserved on beds MM2, Matt, and STC-X in abundances that range in the thousands, and thus, these fossils actually dominate beds. However, their dense packing and typically poor preservation do not allow for accurate counts on these beds.

Both the bed heterogeneity data and evenness values show that even though these represent nearly the oldest animal communities (following on the heels of those of the Avalon Assemblage), there is a sophistication of community assembly on par with that of the Phanerozoic. This is striking, considering the lack of evidence for predation, infaunalization, and widespread skeletonization. Although there is little evidence of interactions between taxa, there are abundant indications that several of the taxa were interacting with the mat.

Population Structure and Reproduction

Preservation of extensive bedding planes also permits analysis of large numbers of a single taxon in situ. Funisia dorothea (Fig. 1B) occurs in huge abundance on a number of bedding planes. It is up to 30 cm long and 12 mm in diameter and is divided longitudinally into serial units 6–8 mm in length throughout the length of the tube (Fig. 1B). Units within the tube decrease in width progressively toward the apex, suggestive of growth via terminal addition. Individuals can occur within dense assemblages, sometimes greater than 1,000/m2. Funisia tubes are directly connected to attachment structures that range from 1 to 8 mm. Importantly, attachment structures of a similar size and developmental stage are spatially clustered, even within individual bedding surfaces.

The phylogenetic affinity of F. dorothea is problematic. The lack of evidence for polypoid openings or pores in the body wall limits our understanding of its taxonomic affinities. However, although it is difficult to place these fossils within Metazoa, the morphology and ecology are suggestive of cnidarian or poriferan grade animals. The branching patterns and rarity of branching of Funisia is consistent with metazoan asexual budding. The consistency of tube widths on individual bedding surfaces, the densely packed nature of the attachment structures, and the clustering pattern of developmental stages of attachment structures on individual bedding planes suggests the juveniles settled as aggregates in a series of limited cohorts.

These solitary organisms thus exhibit growth by the addition of serial units to tubes and by the division of tubes, and dispersed propagation via the production of spats. Among living organisms, spat production is almost ubiquitously the result of sexual reproduction but is known to occur rarely in association with asexual reproduction. Hence, despite its morphologic simplicity, the F. dorothea provides evidence of a variety of growth modes and a complex arrangement for the propagation of new individuals.

Aggregation is not uncommon among some elements of the Ediacara biota, being present in the frondose holdfast Aspidella. These typically occur in dense assemblages, but in contrast to F. dorothea, their right skewed size distribution is consistent with continuous recruitment, rather than being periodic (18). Recently, Darroch and colleagues (51) analyzed the population structures of three rangeomorph taxa and one nonrangeomorph from Mistaken Point, using the Bayesian Information Criterion likelihood-based model selection. They found that although the populations of these taxa had wide distributions, each population was best described as a single distribution. The authors suggest that, assuming these organisms reproduced sexually, their findings most strongly support a continuous or year-round reproduction strategy for these taxa, as this would allow for unimodal populations with large overall size ranges.

Only a few studies of large numbers of individual taxa preserved on a single bedding plane have been done. However, with continued excavation at various sites, these types of studies have the promising potential to elucidate the biology of these organisms, if not the phylogeny, providing another step toward understanding the link with Cambrian and younger animals.

Skeletonization and a Link to the Cambrian

The apparent lack of taxonomic continuity between the Precambrian and Cambrian fossil records has led to controversial and conflicting interpretations about the Ediacara biota and their place in the evolution of metazoan life on this planet. This has been further complicated by the absence of similar modes of construction between these faunas and the rarity of Precambrian skeletonized fossils. A relatively new Ediacara fossil, Coronacollina acula, described by Clites and colleagues (27), is preserved in the Ediacara Member (Rawnsley Quartzite) of South Australia and represents the oldest multielement organism (Fig. 3). Coronacollina consists of a triradial truncated cone associated with ruler-straight spicules, up to 37 cm in length, diverging radially from the cone. The spicules most commonly disarticulated after death and only rarely are found attached to the truncated cone.

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

C. acula represents the oldest evidence of skeletonization. (A) A reconstruction of C. acula, after Clites and colleagues (27). This reconstruction is based on known specimens that have only up to four spicules, but it is likely it had more. (B) The holotype SAM P43257 of C. acula. The central depression is the mold of the thimble-like main body of the specimen. Note the rigid spicules that radiate from the main body.

The morphologic consistency between articulated and disarticulated spicules suggests they were made of a rigid substance, such as opaline silica or calcium carbonate. In life, the spicules likely provided structural support in a manner similar to the Cambrian demosponge, Choia. Although generally preserved flattened, Choia specimens from the Cambrian Fezouata Formation of Morocco exhibit raised central regions, perhaps representing soft tissue replaced by pyrite. The presence of Ediacaran sponge-grade organisms has been suggested by both biomarkers (52) and other body fossils. A recent review questions the Poriferan origin of many of these taxa, suggesting that some are, for example, holdfasts or microbial in origin (53). However, the sharply preserved spiculate structures and the nature of preservation in some of these taxa such as Paleophragmodictya cannot be easily reconciled with organic fibers, tentacles, or microbial structures or a holdfast origin. Constructed from a framework of rigid and brittle elements, Coronacollina reveals a constructional mode only recently recognized among members of the Ediacara biota. It provides a link in constructional mode across the Cambrian boundary and sheds light on the development of structural support in early sponges. Although in many respects morphologically simple, Coronacollina is nonetheless one of the most complicated of the Ediacara taxa because it was composed of at least two different materials: the soft-bodied truncated cone, which was solid enough to withstand compaction, and biomineralized spicules.

Mobility and the Presence of Bilaterians

The majority of organisms comprising the Ediacara Biota are interpreted to represent stationary or attached organisms. However, it now appears that at least four different Ediacaran organisms were capable of movement. The association of certain body fossil taxa with motility and feeding traces provides the earliest evidence that the Ediacara Biota included bilaterian-grade animals. External molds of Kimberella (Fig. 1D) have been documented in close association with casts of arrays of fanned sets of bifid scratch traces (Kimberichnus teruzzii; Fig. 1F) from the Ediacara Member of the Rawnsley Quartzite, South Australia, and the Verkhovka Formation, Zimnie Gory Formation, and in the basal part of the Erga Formation of the White Sea region of northwestern Russia. From their orientation and proximity, these body and trace fossils are interpreted as evidence of mat grazing activities (31, 54, 55). The suggestions of molluscan affinities for Kimberella (23, 24, 53) should not overlook some important differences from extant gastropod grazing behaviors (31, 56). Two genera of the so-called dickinsoniomorphs, Dickinsonia (Fig. 1A) and Yorgia, are preserved as external molds at the end of serial sets of roughly oriented faint casts of what are interpreted as “resting” or “feeding” traces, where these organisms remained stationary for periods of time, decomposing the microbial mat substrate, before moving to the next site, until the sediment-smothering events that preserved them and their “footprints” (57). Suggestions that these are evidence of fungal “fairy-rings” (58), or random products of wave or current transport (59), are easily countered by the repeated observation that the “footprints” were made in a definite order, as determined by identification of the body axis and anterior enlargement of body divisions in these organisms. The implication that the mat on the substrate decomposed sufficiently to enable a cast suggests that such a process could have been a source of nutrition for dickinsoniids. Alone among the Ediacara biota, dickinsoniids feature preserved external body molds with apparent contraction marks and variable patterns of body divisions that might be explained by muscular peristaltic contraction. There is no equivalent evidence of differential contraction of body elements among the array of taxa of Petalonamae, such as Pteridinium (Fig. 1H) and Phyllozoon (9).

The most abundant trace fossils in shallow marine environments associated with rich assemblages of the Ediacara Biota are very common groove and levee trails of Helminthoidichnites (Fig. 1I) that are found in both part and counterpart on numerous bedding surfaces with or without body fossil impressions. Uniquely, Helminthoidichnites is preserved on bed soles as groove and levee and shows alternation of relief, but only when the sandstone layer is less than 15 mm thick and not covering an entire bed. This association is interpreted as a product of mat mining by an animal too small to be characterized from casts and molds and limited by the redox state within partly buried mat substrates. On the basis of fine-grained sandy layers, scalloped levees enable the direction of burrowing to be determined (Fig. 1I, Upper Left). On bed tops, Helminthoidichnites displays evidence of avoidance behavior exhibited by parallel spirals and changing depth where crossings occurred. These traces are common in the younger Ediacaran formations from relatively shallower-water environments such as the Ediacara Member of the Rawnsley Quartzite in South Australia (19), the Blueflower Formation of the Mackenzie Mountains of northwest Canada (60), and the Shibantan Member of the Dengjing Formation in south China (61, 62). It is unlikely these complicated but definitive trace fossils could have been made by anything other than a bilaterian.

The serial arcuate looping forms, Paleopascichnus and Yelovichnus, and chains hemispheres, referred to as Neonereites, are now considered encrusting body fossils, reinterpreted as xenophyophores by Seilacher and colleagues (63), but disputed by Antcliffe and colleagues (64). The oldest described trace fossils seem to be those of actinian-grade polyps that left simple straight or curved locomotive trails in ash-coated, deep-water substrates in the Mistaken Point Formation assemblage in southeastern Newfoundland (65).

Concluding Remarks

Taken as a whole, the Ediacara Biota represents an enigmatic assemblage of fossils that are not easily related to modern taxa. However, examination of aspects of the ecology, such as trace fossils, taphonomy, and morphology, reveal that these fossils show characteristics of modern taxa. It is clear that bilaterians, cnidarians, and poriferans are represented among the Ediacara Biota. Although we may never be able to reconcile the phylogeny of all, or even most, of the Ediacara taxa, it is likely that with these approaches, we will be able to continue to better relate these taxa with both modern and extinct animals.

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to Jane and Ross Fargher for access to their property. Fieldwork was facilitated by D. Rice, M. Dzaugis, M. E. Dzaugis, P. Dzaugis, D. A. Droser, R. Droser, V. Droser, C. Droser, N. Anderson, E. Gooch, C. Casey, M. Laflamme, J. Doggett, J. Paterson, C. Armstrong, J. Perry, D. Reid, J. McEntee, I. Smith, M. Fuller, P. Trusler, members of the South Australian Museum Waterhouse Club, and the Ediacaran Foundation. S. Finnegan, L. Tarhan, and C. Hall aided with this manuscript. The research was supported by National Science Foundation Grant EAR-0074021, NASA Grant NNG04GJ42G NASA Exobiology Program (to M.L.D.), and Australian Research Council Discovery Grant DP0453393 (to J.G.G.).

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: Mary.Droser{at}UCR.EDU.
  • Author contributions: M.L.D. and J.G.G. designed research; M.L.D. and J.G.G. performed research; M.L.D. analyzed data; and M.L.D. and J.G.G. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1403669112/-/DCSupplemental.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Xiao S,
    2. Laflamme M
    (2009) On the eve of animal radiation: Phylogeny, ecology and evolution of the Ediacara biota. Trends Ecol Evol 24(1):31–40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Narbonne GM
    (2005) The Ediacara biota: Neoproterozoic origin of animals and their ecosystems. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 33:421–442.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. ↵
    1. Conway Morris S
    (1993) The fossil record and the early evolution of the Metazoa. Nature 361:219–225.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    1. Hagadorn JW,
    2. Fedo CM,
    3. Waggoner BM
    (2000) Early Cambrian Ediacaran-type fossils from California. J Paleontol 74(4):731–740.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Jensen SR,
    2. Gehling JG,
    3. Droser ML
    (1998) Ediacara-type fossils in Cambrian sediments. Nature 393:567–569.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. ↵
    1. Lin JP, et al.
    (2006) A Parvancorina-like arthropod from the Cambrian of South China. Hist Biol 18(1):33–45.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    1. Vickers-Rich P,
    2. Komarower P
    , eds (2007) The Rise and Fall of the Ediacaran Biota (Geological Society of London, London).
  8. ↵
    1. Glaessner MF
    (1984) The Dawn of Animal Life: A Biohistorical Study (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge).
  9. ↵
    1. Gehling JG
    (1991) The case for Ediacaran fossil roots to the metazoan tree, Geological Society of India Memoirs (Geological Society of India, Bangalore) Vol 20, pp 181–224.
  10. ↵
    1. Seilacher A
    (1992) Vendobionta and Psammacorallia: Lost constructions of Precambrian evolution. J Geol Soc London 149(4):607–613.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Steiner M,
    2. Reitner J
    (2001) Evidence of organic structures in Ediacara-type fossils and associated microbial mats. Geology 29(12):1119–1122.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Zhuravlev AYu
    (1993) Were Ediacaran Vendobionta multicellulars? (with 3 figures in the text). Neues Jahrb Geol Palaontol Abh 190(2):299–314.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Retallack GJ
    (1994) Were the Ediacaran fossils lichens? Paleobiology 20(4):523–544.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  14. ↵
    1. Peterson KJ,
    2. Waggoner B,
    3. Hagadorn JW
    (2003) A fungal analog for newfoundland ediacaran fossils? Integr Comp Biol 43(1):127–136.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Erwin DH, et al.
    (2011) The Cambrian conundrum: Early divergence and later ecological success in the early history of animals. Science 334(6059):1091–1097.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Fedonkin MA,
    2. Gehling JG,
    3. Grey K,
    4. Narbonne GM,
    5. Vickers-Rich P
    (2008) The Rise of Animals: Evolution and Diversification of the Kingdom Animalia (Johns Hopkins Univ Press, Baltimore).
  17. ↵
    1. Gehling JG
    (1999) Microbial mats in terminal Proterozoic siliciclasitcs: Ediacaran death masks. Palaios 14(1):40–57.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Droser ML,
    2. Gehling JG,
    3. Jensen SR
    (2006) Assemblage palaeoecology of the Ediacara biota: The unabridged edition? Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 232(2):131–147.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. ↵
    1. Gehling JG,
    2. Droser ML
    (2013) How well do fossil assemblages of the Ediacara Biota tell time? Geology 41(4):447–450.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Grazhdankin D
    (2004) Patterns of distribution in the Ediacaran biotas: Facies versus biogeography and evolution. Paleobiology 30(2):203–221.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Laflamme M,
    2. Darroch SAF,
    3. Tweedt SM,
    4. Peterson KJ,
    5. Erwin DH
    (2013) The end of the Ediacara biota: Extinction, biotic replacement, or Cheshire Cat? Gondwana Res 23(2):558–573.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. ↵
    1. Laflamme M,
    2. Xiao S,
    3. Kowalewski M
    (2009) From the Cover: Osmotrophy in modular Ediacara organisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(34):14438–14443.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Fedonkin MA,
    2. Waggoner BM
    (1997) The Late Precambrian fossil Kimberella is a mollusc-like bilaterian organism. Nature 388(6645):868–871.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. ↵
    1. Seilacher A
    (1999) Biomat-related lifestyles in the Precambrian. Palaios 14(1):86–93.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Droser ML,
    2. Gehling JG
    (2008) Synchronous aggregate growth in an abundant new Ediacaran tubular organism. Science 319(5870):1660–1662.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Germs GJB
    (1972) New shelly fossils from Nama Group, South West Africa. Am J Sci 272:752–761.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Clites EC,
    2. Droser ML,
    3. Gehling JG
    (2012) The advent of hard-part structural support among the Ediacara biota: Ediacaran harbinger of a Cambrian mode of body construction. Geology 40(4):307–310.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Ivantsov AYu,
    2. Malakhovskaya YE
    (2002) Giant traces of Vendian animals. Dokl Earth Sci 385:618–622.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. Fedonkin MA
    (2003) The origin of the Metazoa in the light of the Proterozoic fossil record. Paleontological Research 7(1):9–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. ↵
    1. Seilacher A,
    2. Buatois LA,
    3. Mangáno MG
    (2005) Trace fossils in the Ediacaran-Cambrian transition: Behavioral diversification, ecological turnover and environmental shift. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 227(4):323–356.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. ↵
    1. Gehling JG,
    2. Runnegar BN,
    3. Droser ML
    (2014) Scratch traces of large Ediacara bilaterian animals. J Paleontol 88(2):284–298.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Gehling JG,
    2. Droser ML
    (2009) Textured organic surfaces associated with the Ediacara Biota in South Australia. Earth Sci Rev 96(3):196–206.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. ↵
    1. Laflamme M,
    2. Schiffbauer JD,
    3. Narbonne GM,
    4. Briggs DEG
    (2011) Microbial biofilms and the preservation of the Ediacara biota. Lethaia 44(2):203–213.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. ↵
    1. Xiao S, et al.
    (2013) Affirming life aquatic for the Ediacara biota in China and Australia. Geology 41(10):1095–1098.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Retallack GJ
    (2013) Ediacaran life on land. Nature 493(7430):89–92.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Antcliffe JB,
    2. Hancy AD
    (2013) Reply to Retallack (2013): Ediacaran characters. Evol Dev 15(6):389–392.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Chen Z, et al.
    (2014) New Ediacaran fossils preserved in marine limestone and their ecological implications. Sci Rep 4(4180).
  38. ↵
    1. Gehling JG,
    2. Droser ML
    (2014) How well do fossil assemblages of the Ediacara Biota tell time?: REPLY. Geology 42(4):e333.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    1. Menon LR,
    2. McIlroy D,
    3. Brasier MD
    (2013) Evidence for Cnidaria-like behavior in ca. 560 Ma Ediacaran Aspidella. Geology 41(8):895–898.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. Xiao S, et al.
    (2014) Affirming life aquatic for the Ediacara biota in China and Australia: REPLY. Geology 42(3):e326.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    1. Mason SJ,
    2. Narbonne GM,
    3. Dalrymple RW,
    4. O’Brien SJ
    (2013) Paleoenvironmental analysis of Ediacaran strata in the Catalina Dome, Bonavista Peninsula, Newfoundland. Can J Earth Sci 50(2):197–212.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    1. Wood DA,
    2. Dalrymple RW,
    3. Narbonne GM,
    4. Gehling JG,
    5. Clapham ME
    (2003) Paleoenvironmental analysis of the late Neoproterozoic Mistaken Point and Trepassey formations, southeastern Newfoundland. Can J Earth Sci 40(10):1375–1391.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    1. Zhu M,
    2. Gehling JG,
    3. Xiao S,
    4. Zhao Y,
    5. Droser ML
    (2008) Eight-armed Ediacara fossil preserved in contrasting taphonomic windows from China and Australia. Geology 36(11):867–870.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    1. Jiang G,
    2. Shi X,
    3. Zhang S,
    4. Wang Y,
    5. Xiao S
    (2011) Stratigraphy and paleogeography of the Ediacaran Doushantuo Formation (ca. 635-551Ma) in South China. Gondwana Res 19(4):831–849.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  45. ↵
    1. Gehling JG
    (2000) Environmental interpretation and a sequence stratigraphic framework for the terminal Proterozoic Ediacara Member within the Rawnsley Quartzite, South Australia. Precambrian Res 100(1):65–95.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  46. ↵
    1. Hall M, et al.
    (2013) Stratigraphy, palaeontology and geochemistry of the late Neoproterozoic Aar Member, southwest Namibia: Reflecting environmental controls on Ediacara fossil preservation during the terminal Proterozoic in African Gondwana. Precambrian Res 238:214–232.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  47. ↵
    1. Liu AG,
    2. McIlroy D,
    3. Matthews JD,
    4. Brasier MD
    (2012) A new assemblage of juvenile, Ediacaran fronds from the Drook Formation, Newfoundland. J Geol Soc London 169(4):395–403.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    1. Tarhan LG,
    2. Droser ML,
    3. Gehling JG
    (2010) Taphonomic controls on Ediacaran diversity: Uncovering the holdfast origin of morphologically variable enigmatic structures. Palaios 25(12):823–830.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    1. Liu AG,
    2. McIlroy D,
    3. Antcliffe JB,
    4. Brasier MD
    (2011) Effaced preservation in the Ediacara biota of Avalonia and its implications for the early macrofossil record. Palaeontology 54:607–630.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  50. ↵
    1. Powell MG,
    2. Kowalewski M
    (2002) Increase in evenness and sampled alpha diversity through the Phanerozoic: Comparison of early Paleozoic and Cenozoic marine fossil assemblages. Geology 30(4):331–334.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    1. Darroch SAF,
    2. Laflamme M,
    3. Clapham ME
    (2013) Population structure of the oldest known macroscopic communities from Mistaken Point, Newfoundland. Paleobiology 39(4):591–608.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    1. Love GD, et al.
    (2009) Fossil steroids record the appearance of Demospongiae during the Cryogenian period. Nature 457(7230):718–721.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Antcliffe JB,
    2. Callow RHT,
    3. Brasier MD
    (2014) Giving the early fossil record of sponges a squeeze. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 89(4):972–1004.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  54. ↵
    1. Fedonkin MA,
    2. Simonetta A,
    3. Ivantzov AYu
    (2007) New data on Kimberella, the Vendian mollusk-like organism (White Sea region, Russia): Palaeoecological and evolutionary implications. Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ 286(1):157–179.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  55. ↵
    1. Ivantsove AYu
    (2013) Trace fossils of Precambrian metazoans “Vendobionata” and “Mollusks” Stratigr Geol Correl 21:252–264.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  56. ↵
    1. Ivantsov AYu
    (2010) Paleontological evidence for the supposed Precambrian occurrence of mollusks. Paleontol J 44(12):1552–1559.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  57. ↵
    1. Briggs DEG
    1. Gehling JG, et al.
    (2005) Ediacara organisms: Relating form to function. Evolving Form and Function: Fossils and Development, ed Briggs DEG (Yale Univ. New Haven, CT), (CT), pp 43–66.
  58. ↵
    1. Retallack GJ
    (2007) Growth, decay and burial compaction of Dickinsonia, an iconic Ediacaran fossil. Alcheringa 31(3):215–240.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  59. ↵
    1. McIlroy D,
    2. Brasier MD,
    3. Lang AS
    (2009) Smothering of microbial mats by macrobiota: Implications for the Ediacara biota. J Geol Soc London 166(6):1117–1121.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  60. ↵
    1. Carbonne C,
    2. Narbonne GM
    (2014) When life got smart: The evolution of behavioral complexity through the Ediacaran and Early Cambrian of NW Canada. J Paleontol 88(2):309–330.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  61. ↵
    1. Chen Z, et al.
    (2013) Trace fossil evidence for Ediacaran bilaterian animals with complex behaviors. Precambrian Res 224:690–701.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  62. ↵
    1. Meyer M, et al.
    (2014) Interactions between Ediacaran animals and microbial mats: Insights from Lamonte trevallis, a new trace fossil from the Dengying Formation of South China. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 396:62–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  63. ↵
    1. Seilacher A,
    2. Grazhdankin D,
    3. Legouta A
    (2003) Ediacaran biota: The dawn of animal life in the shadow of giant protists. Paleontological Research 7(1):43–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  64. ↵
    1. Antcliffe JB,
    2. Gooday AJ,
    3. Brasier MD
    (2011) Testing the protozoan hypothesis for Ediacaran fossils: A developmental analysis of Palaeopasichnus. Palaeontology 54(5):1157–1175.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  65. ↵
    1. Liu AG,
    2. McIlroy D,
    3. Brasier MD
    (2010) First evidence for locomotion in the Ediacara biota from the 656 Ma Mistaken Point Formation, Newfoundland. Geology 38(2):123–126.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The advent of animals: The view from the Ediacaran
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The advent of animals: View from the Ediacaran
Mary L. Droser, James G. Gehling
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Apr 2015, 112 (16) 4865-4870; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1403669112

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
The advent of animals: View from the Ediacaran
Mary L. Droser, James G. Gehling
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Apr 2015, 112 (16) 4865-4870; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1403669112
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Article Classifications

  • Biological Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Physical Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 112 (16)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • The Temporal and Spatial Record
    • Environments of the Ediacara Biota
    • Heterogeneity of the Ediacaran Seafloor: An Example from the Ediacaran of South Australia
    • Population Structure and Reproduction
    • Skeletonization and a Link to the Cambrian
    • Mobility and the Presence of Bilaterians
    • Concluding Remarks
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Setting sun over a sun-baked dirt landscape
Core Concept: Popular integrated assessment climate policy models have key caveats
Better explicating the strengths and shortcomings of these models will help refine projections and improve transparency in the years ahead.
Image credit: Witsawat.S.
Model of the Amazon forest
News Feature: A sea in the Amazon
Did the Caribbean sweep into the western Amazon millions of years ago, shaping the region’s rich biodiversity?
Image credit: Tacio Cordeiro Bicudo (University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil), Victor Sacek (University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil), and Lucy Reading-Ikkanda (artist).
Syrian archaeological site
Journal Club: In Mesopotamia, early cities may have faltered before climate-driven collapse
Settlements 4,200 years ago may have suffered from overpopulation before drought and lower temperatures ultimately made them unsustainable.
Image credit: Andrea Ricci.
Steamboat Geyser eruption.
Eruption of Steamboat Geyser
Mara Reed and Michael Manga explore why Yellowstone's Steamboat Geyser resumed erupting in 2018.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Birds nestling on tree branches
Parent–offspring conflict in songbird fledging
Some songbird parents might improve their own fitness by manipulating their offspring into leaving the nest early, at the cost of fledgling survival, a study finds.
Image credit: Gil Eckrich (photographer).

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490