Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: From promise to practice
- aThe Natural Capital Project, c/o School of Environment and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195;
- bWoods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305;
- cInstitute on the Environment, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108;
- dDepartment of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108;
- eThe Natural Capital Project, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108;
- fDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97333;
- gThe Natural Capital Project, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305;
- hDepartment of Biology, Center for Conservation Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305;
- iGlobal Economic Dynamics and the Biosphere, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm SE-104 05, Sweden;
- jCentre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom;
- kMahatma Gandhi Institute of Education for Peace and Sustainable Development, New Delhi 110 029, India;
- lStockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm SE-106 91, Sweden;
- mDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305;
- nBeijer Institute of Ecological Economics, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm SE-104 05, Sweden;
- oWorld Wildlife Fund, Washington, DC 20037;
- pThe Nature Conservancy, Seattle, WA 91805;
- qInstitute of Population and Development Studies, School of Public Policy and Administration, Xian Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province 710049, People’s Republic of China;
- rWorld Wildlife Fund-UK, The Living Planet Centre, Surrey GU21 4LL, United Kingdom;
- sState Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, People’s Republic of China;
- tNatural Resources and the Environment, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Stellenbosch 7599, South Africa;
- uGund Institute of Ecological Economics, and Rubenstein School for Environment and Natural Resources, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405;
- vThe Nature Conservancy, Santa Cruz, CA 95060;
- wDepartment of Geography, and Conservation Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, United Kingdom
See allHide authors and affiliations
This article has a Letter. Please see:
- Relationship between Research Article and Letter - September 18, 2015

Abstract
The central challenge of the 21st century is to develop economic, social, and governance systems capable of ending poverty and achieving sustainable levels of population and consumption while securing the life-support systems underpinning current and future human well-being. Essential to meeting this challenge is the incorporation of natural capital and the ecosystem services it provides into decision-making. We explore progress and crucial gaps at this frontier, reflecting upon the 10 y since the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. We focus on three key dimensions of progress and ongoing challenges: raising awareness of the interdependence of ecosystems and human well-being, advancing the fundamental interdisciplinary science of ecosystem services, and implementing this science in decisions to restore natural capital and use it sustainably. Awareness of human dependence on nature is at an all-time high, the science of ecosystem services is rapidly advancing, and talk of natural capital is now common from governments to corporate boardrooms. However, successful implementation is still in early stages. We explore why ecosystem service information has yet to fundamentally change decision-making and suggest a path forward that emphasizes: (i) developing solid evidence linking decisions to impacts on natural capital and ecosystem services, and then to human well-being; (ii) working closely with leaders in government, business, and civil society to develop the knowledge, tools, and practices necessary to integrate natural capital and ecosystem services into everyday decision-making; and (iii) reforming institutions to change policy and practices to better align private short-term goals with societal long-term goals.
Footnotes
- ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: anne.guerry{at}stanford.edu.
Author contributions: A.D.G., S.P., J.L., R.C.-K., G.C.D., R.G., M.R., I.J.B., A.D., T.E., M.W.F., C.F., J.H., P.M.K., B.L.K., S.L., E.M., Z.O., B.R., T.H.R., J.R., H.T., and B.V. wrote the paper.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Citation Manager Formats
Article Classifications
- Biological Sciences
- Sustainability Science
See related content:
- Liability rules can protect natural capital- Sep 18, 2015














