Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
Introduction

Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: From promise to practice

Anne D. Guerry, Stephen Polasky, Jane Lubchenco, Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer, Gretchen C. Daily, Robert Griffin, Mary Ruckelshaus, Ian J. Bateman, Anantha Duraiappah, Thomas Elmqvist, Marcus W. Feldman, Carl Folke, Jon Hoekstra, Peter M. Kareiva, Bonnie L. Keeler, Shuzhuo Li, Emily McKenzie, Zhiyun Ouyang, Belinda Reyers, Taylor H. Ricketts, Johan Rockström, Heather Tallis, and Bhaskar Vira
  1. aThe Natural Capital Project, c/o School of Environment and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195;
  2. bWoods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305;
  3. cInstitute on the Environment, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108;
  4. dDepartment of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108;
  5. eThe Natural Capital Project, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108;
  6. fDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97333;
  7. gThe Natural Capital Project, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305;
  8. hDepartment of Biology, Center for Conservation Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305;
  9. iGlobal Economic Dynamics and the Biosphere, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm SE-104 05, Sweden;
  10. jCentre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom;
  11. kMahatma Gandhi Institute of Education for Peace and Sustainable Development, New Delhi 110 029, India;
  12. lStockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm SE-106 91, Sweden;
  13. mDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305;
  14. nBeijer Institute of Ecological Economics, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm SE-104 05, Sweden;
  15. oWorld Wildlife Fund, Washington, DC 20037;
  16. pThe Nature Conservancy, Seattle, WA 91805;
  17. qInstitute of Population and Development Studies, School of Public Policy and Administration, Xian Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province 710049, People’s Republic of China;
  18. rWorld Wildlife Fund-UK, The Living Planet Centre, Surrey GU21 4LL, United Kingdom;
  19. sState Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, People’s Republic of China;
  20. tNatural Resources and the Environment, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Stellenbosch 7599, South Africa;
  21. uGund Institute of Ecological Economics, and Rubenstein School for Environment and Natural Resources, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405;
  22. vThe Nature Conservancy, Santa Cruz, CA 95060;
  23. wDepartment of Geography, and Conservation Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, United Kingdom

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS June 16, 2015 112 (24) 7348-7355; first published June 15, 2015; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1503751112
Anne D. Guerry
aThe Natural Capital Project, c/o School of Environment and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195;
bWoods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: anne.guerry@stanford.edu
Stephen Polasky
cInstitute on the Environment, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108;
dDepartment of Applied Economics, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108;
eThe Natural Capital Project, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jane Lubchenco
fDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97333;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer
bWoods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305;
gThe Natural Capital Project, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gretchen C. Daily
gThe Natural Capital Project, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305;
hDepartment of Biology, Center for Conservation Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305;
iGlobal Economic Dynamics and the Biosphere, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm SE-104 05, Sweden;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert Griffin
bWoods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mary Ruckelshaus
aThe Natural Capital Project, c/o School of Environment and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195;
bWoods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ian J. Bateman
jCentre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anantha Duraiappah
kMahatma Gandhi Institute of Education for Peace and Sustainable Development, New Delhi 110 029, India;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Elmqvist
lStockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm SE-106 91, Sweden;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marcus W. Feldman
mDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carl Folke
iGlobal Economic Dynamics and the Biosphere, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm SE-104 05, Sweden;
lStockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm SE-106 91, Sweden;
nBeijer Institute of Ecological Economics, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Stockholm SE-104 05, Sweden;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jon Hoekstra
oWorld Wildlife Fund, Washington, DC 20037;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter M. Kareiva
pThe Nature Conservancy, Seattle, WA 91805;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bonnie L. Keeler
cInstitute on the Environment, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108;
eThe Natural Capital Project, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shuzhuo Li
qInstitute of Population and Development Studies, School of Public Policy and Administration, Xian Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province 710049, People’s Republic of China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emily McKenzie
oWorld Wildlife Fund, Washington, DC 20037;
rWorld Wildlife Fund-UK, The Living Planet Centre, Surrey GU21 4LL, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhiyun Ouyang
sState Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, People’s Republic of China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Belinda Reyers
tNatural Resources and the Environment, Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Stellenbosch 7599, South Africa;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Taylor H. Ricketts
uGund Institute of Ecological Economics, and Rubenstein School for Environment and Natural Resources, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Johan Rockström
lStockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Stockholm SE-106 91, Sweden;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Heather Tallis
vThe Nature Conservancy, Santa Cruz, CA 95060;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bhaskar Vira
wDepartment of Geography, and Conservation Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

This article has a Letter. Please see:

  • Relationship between Research Article and Letter - September 18, 2015
  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The central challenge of the 21st century is to develop economic, social, and governance systems capable of ending poverty and achieving sustainable levels of population and consumption while securing the life-support systems underpinning current and future human well-being. Essential to meeting this challenge is the incorporation of natural capital and the ecosystem services it provides into decision-making. We explore progress and crucial gaps at this frontier, reflecting upon the 10 y since the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. We focus on three key dimensions of progress and ongoing challenges: raising awareness of the interdependence of ecosystems and human well-being, advancing the fundamental interdisciplinary science of ecosystem services, and implementing this science in decisions to restore natural capital and use it sustainably. Awareness of human dependence on nature is at an all-time high, the science of ecosystem services is rapidly advancing, and talk of natural capital is now common from governments to corporate boardrooms. However, successful implementation is still in early stages. We explore why ecosystem service information has yet to fundamentally change decision-making and suggest a path forward that emphasizes: (i) developing solid evidence linking decisions to impacts on natural capital and ecosystem services, and then to human well-being; (ii) working closely with leaders in government, business, and civil society to develop the knowledge, tools, and practices necessary to integrate natural capital and ecosystem services into everyday decision-making; and (iii) reforming institutions to change policy and practices to better align private short-term goals with societal long-term goals.

  • sustainable development
  • resilience
  • human well-being
  • decision making
  • beneficiary

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: anne.guerry{at}stanford.edu.
  • Author contributions: A.D.G., S.P., J.L., R.C.-K., G.C.D., R.G., M.R., I.J.B., A.D., T.E., M.W.F., C.F., J.H., P.M.K., B.L.K., S.L., E.M., Z.O., B.R., T.H.R., J.R., H.T., and B.V. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: From promise to practice
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Natural capital informing decisions
Anne D. Guerry, Stephen Polasky, Jane Lubchenco, Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer, Gretchen C. Daily, Robert Griffin, Mary Ruckelshaus, Ian J. Bateman, Anantha Duraiappah, Thomas Elmqvist, Marcus W. Feldman, Carl Folke, Jon Hoekstra, Peter M. Kareiva, Bonnie L. Keeler, Shuzhuo Li, Emily McKenzie, Zhiyun Ouyang, Belinda Reyers, Taylor H. Ricketts, Johan Rockström, Heather Tallis, Bhaskar Vira
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Jun 2015, 112 (24) 7348-7355; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1503751112

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Natural capital informing decisions
Anne D. Guerry, Stephen Polasky, Jane Lubchenco, Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer, Gretchen C. Daily, Robert Griffin, Mary Ruckelshaus, Ian J. Bateman, Anantha Duraiappah, Thomas Elmqvist, Marcus W. Feldman, Carl Folke, Jon Hoekstra, Peter M. Kareiva, Bonnie L. Keeler, Shuzhuo Li, Emily McKenzie, Zhiyun Ouyang, Belinda Reyers, Taylor H. Ricketts, Johan Rockström, Heather Tallis, Bhaskar Vira
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Jun 2015, 112 (24) 7348-7355; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1503751112
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Article Classifications

  • Biological Sciences
  • Sustainability Science

See related content:

  • Liability rules can protect natural capital
    - Sep 18, 2015
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 112 (24)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Defining Natural Capital, Ecosystem Services, and Other Key Terms
    • Taking Stock: Progress and Remaining Challenges
    • A Path Forward: Accelerating Progress Toward Sustainable Development
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Indus River.
Lockdowns and snow melt in South Asia
Relatively clean snow and ice in the Indus River Basin during the COVID-19 pandemic may have reduced meltwater in 2020, compared with the 20-year average.
Image credit: Pixabay/Abdullah_Shakoor.
Water ice clouds on modern Mars.
Greenhouse warming of early Mars
Atmospheric and climate conditions could have created a cloud greenhouse effect to warm Mars and support liquid surface water.
Image credit: NASA/JPL/MSSS.
Researchers report a safety guideline to limit airborne transmission of COVID-19.
Risk of indoor aerosol transmission
Researchers report a safety guideline to limit airborne transmission of COVID-19 that goes beyond the six-foot social distancing guideline.
Image credit: Pixabay/Matryx.
Aerial view of modern wastewater treatment plants with aeration tanks and clarification tanks.
News Feature: Microbes for better sewage treatment
Going beyond conventional approaches, researchers are using carefully cultured bacterial communities to improve sewage treatment.
Image credit: Shutterstock/chekart.
Illustration of colorful carbon nanotube-like figure with a meadow at the center.
Opinion: We can use carbon to decarbonize—and get hydrogen for free
What if we stopped using oil and gas as fuels and instead use them as sources of both hydrogen for fuel and carbon for useful, pervasive materials?
Nanotube image credit: Shutterstock/Gl0ck; Field image credit: Shutterstock/Evgeny Karandaev.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Cozzarelli Prize
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490. PNAS is a partner of CHORUS, COPE, CrossRef, ORCID, and Research4Life.