Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
Research Article

Classical conditioning of analgesic and hyperalgesic pain responses without conscious awareness

View ORCID ProfileKarin Jensen, Irving Kirsch, Sara Odmalm, Ted J. Kaptchuk, and Martin Ingvar
  1. aProgram in Placebo Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215;
  2. bOsher Center for Integrative Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS June 23, 2015 112 (25) 7863-7867; first published May 15, 2015; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1504567112
Karin Jensen
aProgram in Placebo Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215;
bOsher Center for Integrative Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Karin Jensen
  • For correspondence: karin.jensen@ki.se
Irving Kirsch
aProgram in Placebo Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sara Odmalm
bOsher Center for Integrative Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ted J. Kaptchuk
aProgram in Placebo Studies, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin Ingvar
bOsher Center for Integrative Medicine, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, 17176 Stockholm, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  1. Edited by Howard L. Fields, University of California, San Francisco, CA, and accepted by the Editorial Board April 22, 2015 (received for review March 5, 2015)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & SI

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Stimulus parameters and experimental design. The conditioning procedure (COND) included images of two male faces (conditional cues) presented on a computer screen. Human faces used with permission from KDEF. Each face cue was consistently paired with either a high or low heat pain stimulus on the volar forearm. After conditioning, a test sequence was performed (TEST) in which the High cue, the Low cue, and a neutral Control cue were paired with identical moderate heat stimuli. Subliminal images were shown by means of masked faces, and supraliminal images were shown unmasked. Faces were exposed for 12 ms during masked trials (followed by an 84-ms mask) and for 100 ms during unmasked trials. Participants were randomly assigned to one of four combinations of subliminal/supraliminal conditioning and subliminal/supraliminal test sequence.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Pain ratings during subliminal and supraliminal analgesia and hyperalgesia trials. Identical moderate temperatures were paired with a conditioned High Pain cue, Low Pain cue, or Control cue to test how predictive cues changed participants’ pain perception. Participants rated pain intensity on a 0–100 NRS. (Left) Representation of pain ratings during the test sequence that followed the initial conditioning sequence. Bars represent the average pain rating in response to identical moderate temperatures. Error bars represent 2 intrasubject SEs. The P value (P < 0.001) reflects the main effect for cue type across all experimental groups. (Right) Illustration of the interaction of cue type (High, Low, Control) by experimental group (A, B, C, and D). P values reflect the pairwise comparisons between cue types across experimental groups (High–Control, Low–Control, High–Low).

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table 1.

    Participant characteristics

    VariableGroup AGroup BGroup CGroup D
    Age25.1 (5.2)25.9 (4.7)29.5 (10.1)25.0 (5.2)
    Male/female ratio, M/F%39/6136/6458/4227/73
    High pain temperature (calibrated), °C47.5 (1.1)47.1 (1.5)47.1 (1.4)47.5 (1.6)
    Low pain temperature (fixed), °C44.5 (1.1)44.1 (1.5)44.1 (1.4)44.5 (1.6)
    Moderate pain temperature (fixed), °C46.0 (1.1)45.6 (1.5)45.6 (1.4)46.0 (1.6)
    Pain rating, high temperature (NRS)51.7 (20)51.4 (16.5)53.8 (17)55.9 (19)
    Pain rating, low temperature (NRS)11.6 (9.5)18.8 (18)18.3 (12.2)14.2 (13)
    • Calibrated high pain temperatures represent the temperature at which each participant rated pain around 60 on a 0–100 pain NRS. Low pain temperatures were set as 3 °C below the calibrated high pain temperature (fixed), and moderate pain was set as the temperature right in between high and low pain (fixed). Pain ratings (0–100 NRS) are from the conditioning phase, when tailored high and low temperatures were used. Values represent group means and SDs.

    • View popup
    Table 2.

    Pairwise comparisons of test sequence pain ratings with Bonferroni adjustments for multiple comparisons

    ComparisonMean difference (SD)tP95% confidence intervalCohen’s dz
    High–Control5.21 (7.42)4.820.000032.65–7.960.70
    Control–Low1.53 (2.73)3.840.00090.57–2.530.56
    High–Low6.75 (7.88)5.870.0000013.98–9.720.86
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Classical conditioning of analgesic and hyperalgesic pain responses without conscious awareness
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Conditioning without awareness
Karin Jensen, Irving Kirsch, Sara Odmalm, Ted J. Kaptchuk, Martin Ingvar
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Jun 2015, 112 (25) 7863-7867; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1504567112

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Conditioning without awareness
Karin Jensen, Irving Kirsch, Sara Odmalm, Ted J. Kaptchuk, Martin Ingvar
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Jun 2015, 112 (25) 7863-7867; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1504567112
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Article Classifications

  • Biological Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences

See related content:

  • Learning of analgesia and hyperalgesia
    - Jun 08, 2015
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 112 (25)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Online Methods
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Surgeons hands during surgery
Inner Workings: Advances in infectious disease treatment promise to expand the pool of donor organs
Despite myriad challenges, clinicians see room for progress.
Image credit: Shutterstock/David Tadevosian.
Setting sun over a sun-baked dirt landscape
Core Concept: Popular integrated assessment climate policy models have key caveats
Better explicating the strengths and shortcomings of these models will help refine projections and improve transparency in the years ahead.
Image credit: Witsawat.S.
Double helix
Journal Club: Noncoding DNA shown to underlie function, cause limb malformations
Using CRISPR, researchers showed that a region some used to label “junk DNA” has a major role in a rare genetic disorder.
Image credit: Nathan Devery.
Steamboat Geyser eruption.
Eruption of Steamboat Geyser
Mara Reed and Michael Manga explore why Yellowstone's Steamboat Geyser resumed erupting in 2018.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Birds nestling on tree branches
Parent–offspring conflict in songbird fledging
Some songbird parents might improve their own fitness by manipulating their offspring into leaving the nest early, at the cost of fledgling survival, a study finds.
Image credit: Gil Eckrich (photographer).

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490