Chris Field discusses misconceptions about climate change and how humans can adapt to a warming planet.
New Research In
Physical Sciences
Featured Portals
Articles by Topic
Biological Sciences
Featured Portals
Articles by Topic
Edited by M. Granger Morgan, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, and approved June 11, 2015 (received for review November 27, 2014)
Significance
The current carbonization of the global energy system poses a severe challenge for efforts to reduce carbon emissions. Here we show that the increase in the carbon intensity of energy production is caused mainly by the increased use of coal, not only in China and India but also across a broad range of developing countries, especially poor, fast-growing countries mainly in Asia. The (relatively) low coal prices are an important reason countries choose coal to satisfy their energy needs. This result underlines the importance of cheaply available energy for economic growth and suggests that viable alternatives to cheap coal will be required to ensure the participation of developing countries in global climate change mitigation.
Abstract
Coal was central to the industrial revolution, but in the 20th century it increasingly was superseded by oil and gas. However, in recent years coal again has become the predominant source of global carbon emissions. We show that this trend of rapidly increasing coal-based emissions is not restricted to a few individual countries such as China. Rather, we are witnessing a global renaissance of coal majorly driven by poor, fast-growing countries that increasingly rely on coal to satisfy their growing energy demand. The low price of coal relative to gas and oil has played an important role in accelerating coal consumption since the end of the 1990s. In this article, we show that in the increasingly integrated global coal market the availability of a domestic coal resource does not have a statistically significant impact on the use of coal and related emissions. These findings have important implications for climate change mitigation: If future economic growth of poor countries is fueled mainly by coal, ambitious mitigation targets very likely will become infeasible. Building new coal power plant capacities will lead to lock-in effects for the next few decades. If that lock-in is to be avoided, international climate policy must find ways to offer viable alternatives to coal for developing countries.
Footnotes
- ↵1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: steckel{at}mcc-berlin.net or edenhofer{at}pik-potsdam.de.
Author contributions: J.C.S., O.E., and M.J. designed research; J.C.S., O.E., and M.J. performed research; J.C.S. and M.J. analyzed data; and J.C.S. and M.J. wrote the paper.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1422722112/-/DCSupplemental.
- aMercator Research Institute on Global Commons and Climate Change, 10829 Berlin, Germany;
- bPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, 14473 Potsdam, Germany;
- cDepartment Economics of Climate Change, Technische Universität Berlin, 10623 Berlin, Germany
Edited by M. Granger Morgan, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, and approved June 11, 2015 (received for review November 27, 2014)
Significance
The current carbonization of the global energy system poses a severe challenge for efforts to reduce carbon emissions. Here we show that the increase in the carbon intensity of energy production is caused mainly by the increased use of coal, not only in China and India but also across a broad range of developing countries, especially poor, fast-growing countries mainly in Asia. The (relatively) low coal prices are an important reason countries choose coal to satisfy their energy needs. This result underlines the importance of cheaply available energy for economic growth and suggests that viable alternatives to cheap coal will be required to ensure the participation of developing countries in global climate change mitigation.
Abstract
Coal was central to the industrial revolution, but in the 20th century it increasingly was superseded by oil and gas. However, in recent years coal again has become the predominant source of global carbon emissions. We show that this trend of rapidly increasing coal-based emissions is not restricted to a few individual countries such as China. Rather, we are witnessing a global renaissance of coal majorly driven by poor, fast-growing countries that increasingly rely on coal to satisfy their growing energy demand. The low price of coal relative to gas and oil has played an important role in accelerating coal consumption since the end of the 1990s. In this article, we show that in the increasingly integrated global coal market the availability of a domestic coal resource does not have a statistically significant impact on the use of coal and related emissions. These findings have important implications for climate change mitigation: If future economic growth of poor countries is fueled mainly by coal, ambitious mitigation targets very likely will become infeasible. Building new coal power plant capacities will lead to lock-in effects for the next few decades. If that lock-in is to be avoided, international climate policy must find ways to offer viable alternatives to coal for developing countries.
- climate change mitigation
- Kaya decomposition
- developing countries
- coal
Footnotes
- ↵1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: steckel{at}mcc-berlin.net or edenhofer{at}pik-potsdam.de.
Author contributions: J.C.S., O.E., and M.J. designed research; J.C.S., O.E., and M.J. performed research; J.C.S. and M.J. analyzed data; and J.C.S. and M.J. wrote the paper.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1422722112/-/DCSupplemental.
Renaissance of coal
Sign up for Article Alerts
Article Classifications
- Social Sciences
- Sustainability Science
Jump to section
You May Also be Interested in
Could species threatened by climate change and other stresses avoid extinction through rapid evolution?
Image credit: Norman Lee (St. Olaf College, Northfield, MN).
Opinion: The proposed change to the definition of “waters of the United States” flouts sound science
The administration’s proposed rule ignores or misrepresents the conclusions of an EPA panel and, if enacted, will damage our nation’s water resources.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Martha Marks.
Since 1972, ice loss from Greenland has contributed to an estimated 13.7 mm rise in global sea level, with the largest contributions coming from northwest, southeast, and central west Greenland, according to a study.
Image courtesy of Eric Rignot.
Global warming has likely increased the economic disparity between the top and bottom population deciles across the world, thereby generating greater economic inequality than would have occurred without global warming, according to a study.
Image courtesy of Noah S. Diffenbaugh and Marshall Burke.