Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
Research Article

Hyperglycemia impairs left–right axis formation and thereby disturbs heart morphogenesis in mouse embryos

Masahiro Hachisuga, Shinya Oki, Keiko Kitajima, Satomi Ikuta, Tomoyuki Sumi, Kiyoko Kato, Norio Wake, and Chikara Meno
  1. aDepartment of Developmental Biology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan;
  2. bDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS September 22, 2015 112 (38) E5300-E5307; first published September 8, 2015; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1504529112
Masahiro Hachisuga
aDepartment of Developmental Biology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan;
bDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shinya Oki
aDepartment of Developmental Biology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Keiko Kitajima
aDepartment of Developmental Biology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Satomi Ikuta
aDepartment of Developmental Biology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tomoyuki Sumi
aDepartment of Developmental Biology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kiyoko Kato
bDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Norio Wake
bDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chikara Meno
aDepartment of Developmental Biology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: meno@dev.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp
  1. Edited by Clifford J. Tabin, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, and approved August 18, 2015 (received for review March 9, 2015)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Significance

Epidemiological studies have revealed that pregestational diabetes mellitus increases the risk for congenital anomalies, including congenital heart defects (CHDs). Despite the importance of preventing diabetes-related congenital malformations, however, the underlying pathogenic mechanisms have remained largely unknown. Pregestational diabetes mellitus is associated specifically with CHDs accompanied by heterotaxia. We have now examined left–right (L–R) axis formation in embryos of diabetic female mice as well as in mouse embryos exposed to high-glucose concentrations in culture. We found that high-glucose levels prevent establishment of the L–R axis required for heart morphogenesis and the L–R asymmetry of visceral organs. Such a mechanism may thus explain, at least in part, the CHDs and accompanying heterotaxia in the offspring of diabetic mothers.

Abstract

Congenital heart defects with heterotaxia are associated with pregestational diabetes mellitus. To provide insight into the mechanisms underlying such diabetes-related heart defects, we examined the effects of high-glucose concentrations on formation of the left–right axis in mouse embryos. Expression of Pitx2, which plays a key role in left–right asymmetric morphogenesis and cardiac development, was lost in the left lateral plate mesoderm of embryos of diabetic dams. Embryos exposed to high-glucose concentrations in culture also failed to express Nodal and Pitx2 in the left lateral plate mesoderm. The distribution of phosphorylated Smad2 revealed that Nodal activity in the node was attenuated, accounting for the failure of left–right axis formation. Consistent with this notion, Notch signal-dependent expression of Nodal-related genes in the node was also down-regulated in association with a reduced level of Notch signaling, suggesting that high-glucose concentrations impede Notch signaling and thereby hinder establishment of the left–right axis required for heart morphogenesis.

  • diabetes
  • congenital heart defects
  • heterotaxia
  • left–right axis

Congenital heart defects (CHDs) are among the most common birth defects in humans, affecting 0.8–1.16% of live births (1, 2). Such defects are not necessarily caused by genetic alterations, with epidemiological studies having revealed that various modifiable factors increase the risk of specific types of CHD (1, 3). Pregestational diabetes mellitus (DM), including both type 1 and type 2 DM, is one such modifiable factor (1, 3, 4).

Mice and rats have been studied as animal models of diabetic embryopathy. In diabetic patients, metabolic disorders, such as ketosis, accompany hyperglycemia. Glucose and β-hydroxybutyrate, a ketone produced in diabetes, both exhibit teratogenic effects on cultured postimplantation embryos (5⇓–7). Hyperglycemia induces oxidative stress because of the production of reactive oxygen species (8), and such stress has been shown to contribute to aspects of diabetic embryopathy, such as growth retardation and neural tube defects in rat and mouse embryos (9). Oxidative stress induced by hyperglycemia was found to reduce the expression of the paired box gene Pax3 in the neuroepithelium and cardiac neural crest, resulting in an increase in p53-dependent apoptosis in these tissues (10⇓⇓⇓–14). Given that Pax3 is required for formation of the neural tube and septation of the truncus arteriosus, the defects in the neural tube and outflow tract of embryos associated with diabetes are likely a result of the reduction in Pax3 expression (9). In other tissues, however, the mechanisms by which maternal diabetes gives rise to birth defects have remained largely unknown.

Pregestational DM gives rise to CHDs associated with heterotaxia in humans (1, 4, 15, 16). Heterotaxia also occurs in offspring of diabetic female nonobese diabetic mice, a model of type 1 DM. Although the laterality of these mouse offspring varies, CHDs accompanied by right isomerism are the most common phenotype (17). How such defects develop in association with hyperglycemia has remained unclear, however.

The left–right (L–R) asymmetry of visceral organs is generated on the basis of the L–R axis established during early embryogenesis (18). Disturbance of the L–R axis by genetic alterations in mice results in the development of CHDs, as well as laterality defects (19⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓–27). In mice, formation of the L–R axis begins as a result of the generation of leftward fluid flow in the node (nodal flow) at embryonic day (E) 7.75. As a consequence of nodal flow, the L–R asymmetric expression of several genes first appears in crown cells at the periphery of the node. Nodal, which encodes a member of the TGF-β family of proteins, is one such gene, with the level of its expression being greater on the left side than on the right (28, 29). Nodal produced in the crown cells forms a heterodimer with a TGF-β family member, growth differentiation factor 1 (GDF1), which increases its activity, and it is thought to diffuse to the lateral plate mesoderm (LPM) (30, 31). Nodal activates intracellular signaling by binding to Activin receptors and Cryptic cofactor. In the cytoplasm, Smad2 is phosphorylated by activated Activin receptors and then translocates to the nucleus, where it exerts its transactivation activity together with the forkhead box (Fox) transcription factor Foxh1. The activity of Nodal in crown cells is regulated in an L–R asymmetric manner by its inhibitor Cerl2 (32), a DAN domain family member, as is reflected by the L > R distribution of phosphorylated Smad2 (pSmad2) (33). This subtle difference in Nodal activity is then amplified in LPM (34, 35). Nodal transcription is regulated by a positive loop via the action of Smad2 and Foxh1 (36). Nodal produced in the node likely initially activates its own expression in the left LPM (27, 30, 33, 37). The localized expression of Nodal in the left LPM then expands to encompass the entire LPM as a result of the operation of the positive loop (27, 38). At the anterior end of the left LPM, Nodal signals in the left side of the heart primordium, which determines the direction of heart looping (19, 24). Nodal signaling in the left LPM and heart primordium induces the expression of the homeobox gene Pitx2 (39, 40), as a result of which visceral organs acquire their L–R asymmetric morphology. In the heart, the asymmetric expression of Pitx2 is not involved in looping but is required for proper morphogenesis, with Pitx2 mutant mice developing CHDs (21⇓–23, 25, 26).

To understand the molecular etiology of CHDs and heterotaxia associated with maternal diabetes, we examined formation of the L–R axis in embryos derived from female mice with streptozotocin-induced diabetes, as well as in mouse embryos cultured in high-glucose medium. We found that high glucose attenuates Notch signaling in the node, which is followed by down-regulation of Nodal activity at the initial step of L–R axis formation. The reduction in Nodal activity in the node thus prevents the establishment of Nodal expression in the left LPM and consequent Pitx2 expression in the left LPM and heart primordium. Human CHDs accompanied by right isomerism might be explained by this mechanism.

Results

The L–R Axis Is Affected in Embryos of Diabetic Female Mice.

To provide insight into the pathogenesis of heterotaxia in offspring of mothers with pregestational DM, we first examined embryos of female mice with streptozotocin-induced diabetes as an animal model. All E8.7 embryos (n = 126) derived from diabetic females (n = 10) with a blood glucose concentration of 300–490 mg/dL manifested normal looping of the heart tube to the right side (d-loop), as did control embryos of nondiabetic dams (Fig. 1 A and H). In contrast, 6 of 10 litters from dams with a blood glucose level of >490 mg/dL included embryos with abnormal heart looping. In the affected six litters, 11 of 66 evaluable embryos manifested reversed heart looping (l-loop) (Fig. 1 B, C, and H), whereas 10 embryos had the heart tube at the midline without apparent L–R asymmetry (Fig. 1D). Given that the embryos without asymmetric heart looping were at around the seven- to eight-somite stage, when the heart tube begins to elongate, the looping process may have been delayed in these embryos. Embryonic turning is another indicator of the L–R axis, with normal embryos showing clockwise rotation along the long axis as viewed from the cranial to caudal portion. Seven of 52 evaluable embryos in the six litters showing abnormal heart looping also manifested reversed embryonic turning (Fig. 1H). Taken together, these observations suggested that L–R asymmetric morphogenesis might be disturbed as a result of aberrant L–R axis formation in the offspring of female mice with streptozotocin-induced diabetes.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Impaired formation of the L–R axis in embryos of female mice with streptozotocin-induced diabetes. (A–D) Whole-mount in situ hybridization analysis of Pitx2 expression in E8.7 embryos of female mice without diabetes (control) (A) or with severe diabetes (B–D). Anterior views are shown. All isoforms of Pitx2 mRNA are detected. Black arrowheads indicate Pitx2 expression in the left LPM, whereas arrows indicate expression in the endoderm layer of the yolk sac. The asterisk marks the left horn of the sinus venosus. White arrowheads indicate the absence of Pitx2 expression in the left outflow tract. White dashed lines show the direction of heart looping. (E–G) Transverse sections at the level of the green dashed lines in A–C, respectively. Arrowheads show Pitx2 expression in the left outflow tract. (Scale bars, 100 µm.) (H) The percentage of E8.7 embryos manifesting reversed heart looping or embryonic turning among the offspring of diabetic female mice according to the maternal blood glucose concentration. Litters with different percentages of embryos showing reversed heart looping or turning are indicated by blue vertical lines. Parentheses show the number of embryos for evaluation of heart looping. When litters included embryos at stages before the turning process, the number for evaluation of turning is separately indicated in brackets. Embryos with the heart tube at the midline were excluded from the number of embryos evaluable for heart looping.

To examine whether L–R axis formation was indeed affected in such embryos, we performed in situ hybridization analysis of Pitx2 expression. Pitx2 is L–R asymmetrically expressed, with its expression being localized predominantly to the left LPM and heart primordium, as well as the head mesenchyme at E8.7 (Fig. 1 A and E). The expression of Pitx2 was altered in the litters that included embryos with abnormal heart looping or turning, being lost either in both the left LPM and heart primordium (8 of 66 embryos) (Fig. 1 B and F) or in only the left outflow tract (8 of 66 embryos) (Fig. 1D), whereas the expression in head mesenchyme was not affected. Of note, four embryos with Pitx2 expression in the left LPM and heart primordium showed an l-loop of the heart tube (Fig. 1 C and G). Given that the asymmetric expression of Pitx2 is required for heart morphogenesis and L–R asymmetric organogenesis (20⇓⇓–23, 25, 26, 41), CHDs accompanied by heterotaxia in diabetic embryopathy are likely explained by the loss of Pitx2 expression in the left LPM and heart primordium (Discussion).

High Glucose Affects L–R Axis Formation in Mouse Embryos.

The loss of Pitx2 expression indicated that the L–R axis is affected in embryos of diabetic female mice. To understand the mechanism by which the L–R axis is affected by hyperglycemia, we examined embryos exposed to a high-glucose concentration in whole-embryo culture (hereafter referred to as high-glucose embryos). We first determined the d-glucose concentration at which Pitx2 expression in the LPM is lost. Embryos at the head-fold stage (E7.75), before the onset of L–R axis formation, were cultured for 16 h in control (140 mg/dL) or high-glucose (390, 530, or 720 mg/dL) medium, during which time the embryos developed to the six- to seven-somite stage. Whereas most (21 of 23) control embryos expressed Pitx2 in the left LPM (Fig. 2A), the expression was lost in high-glucose embryos in a concentration-dependent manner [390 mg/dL, 7 of 16; 530 mg/dL, 12 of 16 (P < 0.001); 720 mg/dL, 21 of 21 P < 0.001)] (Fig. 2B). To confirm that the change in osmolarity of the medium caused by glucose addition did not affect L–R axis formation, we added l-glucose at 580 mg/dL as well as d-glucose at 140 mg/dL Most (five of seven) embryos cultured in this l-glucose medium showed normal expression of Pitx2 (Fig. 2C), suggesting that d-glucose itself was responsible for the observed disturbance of L–R axis formation.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Loss of Nodal expression in the LPM of embryos exposed to high glucose in culture. (A–G) Whole-mount in situ hybridization analysis of Pitx2 (A–C), Nodal (D, E), and Lefty1 and Lefty2 (F, G) expression in embryos cultured in control (A, D, F), high–d-glucose (B, E, G), or high–l-glucose (C) medium from the head-fold stage for 16 h (A–C) or 12 h (D–G). The expression of Uncx was simultaneously examined as an indicator for somite number in D–G). Anterior views (A–C) or ventral views with anterior to the top (D–F) are shown. All isoforms of Pitx2 mRNA are detected (A–C). Lefty1 and Lefty2 expression is simultaneously detected by corresponding specific probes (F, G). Black arrowheads indicate expression of Pitx2, Nodal, or Lefty2 in the left LPM. White arrowheads indicate Lefty1 expression. Asterisks mark head mesenchyme. (Scale bar, 200 µm.) (H–K) Embryos cultured for 48 h from the head-fold stage in control (H, J) or high-glucose (I, K) medium. The placenta and yolk sac of the embryos in (H) and (I) were removed to show the ventral view of the heart in (J) and (K), respectively. White dashed lines show the direction of heart looping. (Scale bars in H and J, 400 µm.) (L) Summary of the numbers of embryos examined for the direction of heart looping and embryo turning after culture for 48 h. Numbers in parentheses indicate embryos cultured in high-glucose medium for the initial 14 h and in control medium for the subsequent 34 h.

To reproduce the L–R morphological defects observed in the offspring of female mice with streptozotocin-induced diabetes, we subsequently analyzed embryos cultured in high-glucose medium containing glucose at 720 mg/dL. Despite the presence of this high concentration of glucose, embryos at the head-fold stage achieved the stage corresponding to E9.25 after culture for 48 h, although the high-glucose embryos were smaller than control embryos (Fig. 2 H and I). With regard to L–R asymmetric morphogenesis, heart looping occurred normally in control embryos (20 of 20), whereas reversed heart looping was observed in 9 of 14 high-glucose embryos (P < 0.001) (Fig. 2 J–L). As a consequence of normal embryonic turning, the placenta becomes positioned on the right side of the embryo. For control embryos (19 of 20), the placenta was normally positioned on the right side, whereas the placenta was found on the left side for half (7 of 14; P < 0.01) of high-glucose embryos (Fig. 2 H, I, and L), suggesting that the turning process was randomized in these latter embryos. To further confirm that high glucose affects the process of L–R axis formation, we cultured embryos in high-glucose medium for the initial 14 h, during which time the L–R axis is established in control embryos, and in normal medium for the subsequent 34 h. The embryos still manifested reversed heart looping (6 of 12; P < 0.01) with the placenta positioned on the left side (5 of 12; P < 0.01) (Fig. 2L), suggesting that transient elevation of the glucose level at this initial stage can induce heterotaxia.

We next explored why Pitx2 expression in the left LPM is lost in high-glucose embryos. Embryos at the head-fold stage were cultured for 12 h to early somite stages. Transient expression of Nodal in the left LPM not only determines the direction of heart looping and embryonic turning, but also induces the expression of Pitx2 (19, 24, 39). In most (16 of 20) control embryos at the four- to five-somite stage, Nodal was normally expressed in the left LPM (Fig. 2D). However, Nodal expression was not detected in the LPM of any (23 of 23; P < 0.001) of the high-glucose embryos examined (Fig. 2E). We simultaneously examined the expression of the homeobox gene Uncx as an indicator of somite number in this experiment. Although the same numbers of bands of Uncx expression were observed in control and high-glucose embryos at the end of the culture period, the successive stripes of Uncx expression became narrower in high-glucose embryos (Fig. 2 D–G). In addition, newly generated somites were positioned more posteriorly in the high-glucose embryos, suggesting that somitogenesis was affected. We next examined the expression of Lefty genes, which encode TGF-β family ligands. Lefty1 is mainly expressed in the floor plate, whereas Lefty2 is expressed in the left LPM. The expression of these genes for Nodal inhibitors is induced by Nodal signaling, resulting in restriction of the Nodal expression domain to the left side (24, 27, 36, 42, 43). Lefty1 and Lefty2 were normally expressed in most control embryos at the four- to five-somite stage (9 of 14 for both Lefty1 and Lefty2) (Fig. 2F). In contrast, Lefty2 expression was lost (14 of 14; P < 0.001) and Lefty1 expression was detected in only a few cells of the node (11 of 14) in high-glucose embryos (Fig. 2G). The loss of Lefty expression in high-glucose embryos was likely because of the absence of Nodal expression in the left LPM. Taken together, these results thus indicated that high glucose inhibits Nodal expression in the left LPM, which in turn results in the loss of Pitx2 expression and randomization of heart looping and embryonic turning.

LPM Is Competent to Express Nodal in High-Glucose Embryos.

Establishment of concordant L–R asymmetry of visceral organs requires expansion of Nodal expression in the entire LPM. Nodal expression in LPM is first induced locally by a signal from the node and then expands along the anteroposterior axis through the action of the Nodal positive loop (27⇓–29, 36). Cryptic, which encodes a cofactor of Nodal signaling, is expressed in the LPM, floor plate, and node, and its expression is required for Nodal expression in the LPM (24). We found that Cryptic was normally expressed in these tissues in both control (n = 7) and high-glucose (n = 10) embryos (Fig. 3 A and B). To examine whether the LPM is competent to express Nodal in high-glucose embryos, we subjected embryos at the head-fold stage to local transfection with Nodal and GFP expression vectors in the right posterior mesoderm and then cultured the embryos in control or high-glucose medium. In this assay, endogenous Nodal expression is expected to be induced by ectopic Nodal derived from the expression vector (27, 34). In control embryos, endogenous expression of Nodal spread from the GFP+ transfection site, resulting in Nodal expression in the right LPM (three of six) or both the left and right LPM (three of six) (Fig. 3 C and E). In contrast, Nodal expression spread from the transfection site but did not appear in the left LPM in five of seven high-glucose embryos; the remaining two of seven embryos did not express Nodal in the LPM (Fig. 3 D and E). These results suggested that LPM of high-glucose embryos retains competency to express Nodal through the action of the positive loop.

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Competence of the LPM of high-glucose embryos to express Nodal. (A and B) Whole-mount in situ hybridization analysis of Cryptic expression in embryos cultured from the head-fold stage for 12 h in control (A) or high-glucose (B) medium. Ventral views with anterior to the top are shown. The node and LPM are indicated by asterisks and arrowheads, respectively. (Scale bar, 200 µm.) (C and D) Whole-mount in situ hybridization analysis of Nodal and GFP expression in embryos subjected to local transfection with corresponding expression vectors at the head-fold stage and then cultured for 12 h in control (C) or high-glucose (D) medium. Transfected cells (dark blue) visualized with the GFP probe are present within the region demarcated by the dashed line. Nodal expression (brownish red) was detected in the node and LPM (arrows). Right ventral views are shown. (Scale bar, 200 µm.) (E) Summary of Nodal expression patterns in the LPM of transfected embryos. (F–H) Confocal immunofluorescence images of pSmad2 expression (red) in ES cell colonies cultured for 12 h either in control medium without (F) or with (G) SB431542 or in high-glucose medium (H). Nuclei were stained with TO-PRO3 (blue). (Scale bar, 100 µm.)

To further exclude the possibility that high glucose inhibits the Nodal signaling pathway, we examined the phosphorylation of Smad2 in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells exposed to high glucose. Binding of Nodal to Activin receptors induces the phosphorylation of Smad2 and its translocation to the nucleus, where it exerts its transactivation activity. Smad2 is phosphorylated in mouse ES cells as a result of the autonomous production of Nodal and Activin (44). As expected, pSmad2 was detected in the nuclei of ES cells cultured in standard medium (Fig. 3F). Whereas SB431542, a potent inhibitor of type I Activin receptor-like kinase receptors, attenuated Smad2 phosphorylation in ES cells, culture of the cells in high-glucose medium (containing d-glucose at 850 mg/dL) for 12 h had no such effect (Fig. 3 G and H), indicating that high glucose does not interfere with Nodal-Activin signaling in ES cells. Taken together, these results suggested that high glucose impairs L–R axis formation before the induction of Nodal expression in LPM rather than at the amplification stage.

High Glucose Reduces Nodal Activity in the Node.

Nodal produced in the crown cells of the node is required for the subsequent expression of Nodal in the left LPM (30, 32, 37). We therefore next examined whether the expression of Nodal-related genes, including Nodal, Gdf1, and Cerl2, was affected in the node of high-glucose embryos. In cultured control embryos, Nodal expression was normally observed in crown cells at the three- to four-somite stage (n = 8) (Fig. 4A). In high-glucose embryos, however, the Nodal expression domain was found to be narrowed and slightly shortened and to have lost its crescent shape (n = 8; P < 0.001) (Fig. 4B). The product of Gdf1 expressed in crown cells and the LPM enhances the activity of Nodal through formation of a Nodal-GDF1 heterodimer (31). Gdf1 expression in the node appeared normal in control embryos (n = 10), whereas its domain in high-glucose embryos was also narrowed (7 of 12) and showed various degrees of shortening (n = 12) (Fig. 4 C, D, and D′). These results thus suggested that the amount of Nodal-GDF1 produced in the node is reduced in the high-glucose condition. Expression of Nodal in the left LPM requires the activity of Nodal in crown cells to be regulated in an L–R asymmetric manner, with Cerl2 playing an essential role in such regulation through suppression of Nodal activity (32, 33, 35). Cerl2 is expressed in crown cells, with the level of expression being higher on the right side. In control embryos (13 of 14), the depth of staining for Cerl2 expression became symmetric as a result of culture, whereas the expression domain was larger on the right side than on the left side. In high-glucose embryos, however, Cerl2 expression was down-regulated, although the extent of this change was not as great as that for Nodal or Gdf1 (n = 15; P < 0.001) (Fig. 4 E and F). The right-sided dominance of the Cerl2 expression domain remained apparent in most high-glucose embryos (12 of 15). Collectively, these results indicated that the expression of genes that determine the activity of Nodal in the node is attenuated in high-glucose embryos. The activity of Nodal in the node might thus be reduced as a result of a change in the balance of the expression of these genes.

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Down-regulation of Nodal activity in the node by high glucose. (A–F) Whole-mount in situ hybridization analysis of Nodal (A, B), Gdf1 (C, D, D′), and Cerl2 (E, F) expression in embryos cultured in control (A, C, E) or high-glucose (B, D, D′, F) medium from the head-fold to early somite stages. Expression of Uncx was detected simultaneously with Nodal or Cerl2 expression as an indicator for somite number. The node region is shown with anterior to the top. (Scale bar, 100 µm.) (G and H) Confocal immunohistofluorescence detection of pSmad2 (red) in embryos cultured in control (G) or high-glucose (H) medium. Nuclei were stained with TO-PRO3 (blue). Ventral views around the node region of embryos at the four-somite stage are shown with anterior to the top. (Scale bar, 200 µm.) (I and J) Enlarged views of optical cross-sections at the level of the node shown by the dashed lines in G and H, respectively. Arrows indicate crown cells. (Scale bar, 100 µm.)

We next examined Nodal activity by detecting the distribution of pSmad2 in high-glucose embryos by immunohistofluorescence analysis. The phosphorylation of Smad2 at early somite stages depends on Nodal signaling, which is thought to occur first in the node and then to spread to the left LPM before the onset of Nodal expression in LPM (33). In cultured control embryos, pSmad2 was detected in crown cells and the left LPM at the four-somite stage (n = 17) (Fig. 4 G and I). In high-glucose embryos, however, pSmad2 was not detected in either crown cells or the left LPM at the four- to five-somite stage (n = 23) (Fig. 4 H and J). Instead, pSmad2 was detected only in pit cells of the posterior node (16 of 23 embryos; P < 0.001). These results suggested that the activity of Nodal produced in the node of high-glucose embryos is markedly reduced, resulting in the failure to express Nodal in the LPM.

Notch Signaling Is Attenuated in the High-Glucose Condition.

We next explored why the expression of Nodal-related genes is attenuated in crown cells of high-glucose embryos. To exclude the possibility that formation of the node is impaired in these embryos, we examined the expression of sonic hedgehog (Shh) and Foxa2, representative marker genes for the node and floor plate. Both Shh and Foxa2 were normally expressed in the node of high-glucose embryos (n = 9 and 11, respectively) at the three- to four-somite stage at levels similar to those observed in control embryos (n = 10 and 10) (Fig. 5 A–D). Expression of Foxj1 in the node is required for ciliogenesis and the function of monocilia in the node (45). Expression of this gene appeared normal in the node of both control (n = 11) and high-glucose (n = 12) embryos (Fig. 5 E and F). We next examined the morphology of the node in cultured embryos at the three- to four-somite stage by scanning electron microscopy. In some cultured embryos, large cells lacking a cilium were apparent among the pit cells (4 of 11 for control; 5 of 9 for high glucose) (Fig. S1 B and C). Although most high-glucose embryos (7 of 9) manifested ciliated pit cells similar to those of control embryos (n = 11) (Fig. S1 A–C), the pit cells lacking a cilium occupied a large area of the node in two high-glucose embryos (Fig. S1D). Leftward nodal flow was observed in high-glucose embryos as well as in control embryos (n = 11 for control; 7 of 9 for high glucose) (Movies S1 and S2). Even in the two high-glucose embryos with defective pit cells, a weak nodal flow was observed in the ciliated region (Movie S3). Taken together, these results suggested that node formation was not severely impaired in most embryos exposed to high glucose.

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Normal Notch-related gene expression around the node of high-glucose embryos. Embryos cultured in control (A, C, E, G, I, K) or high-glucose (B, D, F, H, J, L) medium from the head-fold to early somite stages were subjected to whole-mount in situ hybridization analysis of Shh (A, B), Foxa2 (C, D), Foxj1 (E, F), Dll1 (G, H), Notch1 (I, J), and Notch2 (K, L) expression. Expression of Uncx was detected simultaneously with that of Dll1 as an indicator for somite number. The node region is shown with anterior to the top. (Scale bar, 100 µm.)

Fig. S1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. S1.

Scanning electron microscopy of the node of cultured embryos at the three- to four-somite stage. Embryos were cultured from the head-fold stage in control (A, C) or high-glucose (B, D) medium. Anterior is to the top. Node cilia were observed in embryos cultured under either condition, although occasional large pit cells without a cilium (asterisks) were apparent in some of the cultured embryos (B, C). Pit cells lacking a cilium occupied the posterior area of the node in D. A hollow in the posterior-most region of the node (arrow) was also observed more frequently in high-glucose embryos (2 of 11 for control; 6 of 9 for high glucose) (D). (Scale bar, 30 µm.)

Expression of Nodal in the node is induced by Notch signaling (46⇓–48). We have also previously shown that Gdf1 and Cerl2 expression in crown cells is extinguished by a Notch signaling inhibitor (48). We examined whether Notch signaling is affected in high-glucose embryos at early somite stages. Delta-like 1 (Dll1) induces Nodal expression in crown cells through interaction with its receptors Notch1 and Notch2 (46, 47). There was no apparent difference in the expression of Dll1 around the node (n = 12 and 11, respectively), in that of Notch1 in crown cells and paraxial mesoderm (n = 12 and 12), and in that of Notch2 in the node and paraxial mesoderm (n = 9 and 9) between control and high-glucose embryos (Fig. 5 G–L). We also examined the distribution of Notch1 in control and high-glucose embryos by immunohistofluorescence analysis. Notch1 was detected predominantly around the node including the crown cells, in the nascent mesoderm at the anterior primitive streak, and in newly generated somites in control embryos (n = 5) (Fig. 6A). In high-glucose embryos, although the staining in the nascent mesoderm was irregular, we did not detect an apparent change in Notch1 distribution in crown cells (n = 6) (Fig. 6 B and E). We next examined whether Notch signaling might be affected in high-glucose embryos by immunostaining for the cleaved Notch1 intracellular domain (cNICD1) (49). We found that the amount of cNICD1 was significantly reduced in crown cells of high-glucose embryos (n = 13; P < 0.001) at early somite stages compared with that in control embryos (n =14) (Fig. 6 C–E). These results thus suggested that high glucose impairs Notch signaling in the node at the level or upstream of cleavage of the Notch intracellular domain, possibly accounting for the down-regulation of Nodal-related gene expression in crown cells.

Fig. 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6.

Inhibition of Notch signaling in the node by high glucose. Embryos cultured in control (A, C) or high-glucose (B, D) medium from the head-fold to early somite stages were subjected to immunohistofluorescence analysis of Notch1 (red) (A, B) or cNICD1 (red) (C, D). Nuclei were also stained with TO-PRO3 (blue). Ventral views of the node region are shown with anterior to the top. Arrowheads indicate staining in crown cells, whereas dashed lines demarcate the node. Insets in C and D show optical cross-sections at the level including the node shown by the white lines in the merged images. Arrows indicate crown cells. (Scale bar, 200 µm.) (E) Comparison of fluorescence intensity for Notch1 or cNICD1 in crown cells between control (C) and high-glucose (H) embryos. In the panel on the right, average fluorescence intensity of Notch1 or cNICD1 is normalized by that of TO-PRO3 in each embryo [log2(red/blue)]. P < 0.001; NS, not significant (P = 0.082).

In summary, high glucose was found to directly affect L–R axis formation in mouse embryos. Attenuation of Notch signaling in crown cells of the node may prevent the establishment of a sufficient level of Nodal and Gdf1 expression in the node of high-glucose embryos. Expression of Nodal is therefore not initiated in the left LPM of these embryos, leading to failure of Pitx2 expression. Thus, the loss of Nodal and Pitx2 expression likely accounts for CHDs and abnormal L–R asymmetric morphogenesis apparent in the offspring of diabetic mothers.

Discussion

Although case-control studies have shown that CHDs and accompanying laterality defects are associated with pregestational DM (1, 4, 15, 16), the molecular etiology of these defects has remained largely unknown. We have now shown that maternal hyperglycemia in mice impairs formation of the L–R axis. The directions of cardiac looping and embryonic turning were thus found to be reversed in embryos of dams with streptozotocin-induced diabetes. In addition, Pitx2 expression in the left LPM and heart primordium was lost in these embryos, indicative of failure to establish the L–R axis. Furthermore, culture of embryos from the head-fold stage in high-glucose medium also resulted in the loss of Pitx2 expression, with this loss being attributable to the loss of Nodal expression in the left LPM. Given that the asymmetric morphology of viscera including the heart is determined by the Nodal–Pitx2 pathway, CHDs and accompanying laterality defects in diabetic embryopathy can be explained, at least in part, by the loss of Nodal and Pitx2 expression.

With the use of whole-embryo culture, we found that the target of high glucose is Notch signaling in crown cells of the node. The amount of cNICD1 in crown cells was thus significantly reduced in high-glucose embryos. Despite its small size, the node plays a fundamental role in L–R axis formation. First, Nodal produced by crown cells induces Nodal expression in the LPM (37). Second, the L–R asymmetric activity of Nodal in the node determines the side on which Nodal is expressed in the LPM (32, 33, 35). Notch signaling is required for Nodal expression in the node (46, 47). In addition, the expression of Gdf1, which encodes a heterodimerization partner of Nodal, is also likely induced by Notch signaling (48). The attenuated expression of Nodal and Gdf1 in the node of high-glucose embryos is thus likely attributable to the down-regulation of Notch signaling. The activity of Nodal was virtually undetectable in the node of high-glucose embryos, which probably accounts for the loss of Nodal expression in the LPM. Although the mechanism by which Notch signaling is suppressed by high glucose remains to be determined, our findings indicate that high glucose affects the initial stage of L–R axis formation. In addition, these findings suggest that a transient deviation of glycemic control at this stage, rather than continuous hyperglycemia at later stages of L–R axis formation, may give rise to CHDs in human patients.

Reversed heart looping or embryonic turning frequently occurred in litters of dams with a blood glucose concentration of >490 mg/dL. Our finding that the L–R axis is affected only at such high-glucose levels might explain the rarity of heterotaxia associated with pregestational diabetes in humans. It does not necessarily suggest, however, that heterotaxia does not occur at less-pronounced glucose levels in humans. Somitogenesis progresses faster in mice than in human embryos, suggesting that the period of L–R axis formation is also longer in humans. If the sum of excess glucose is the key determinant at this stage, then longer exposure to lower glucose levels may affect L–R axis formation in human embryos.

In mice, the failure to acquire Nodal expression in the LPM results in right isomerism of viscera and specific types of CHD. For example, in Cryptic−/− mutant mice, which do not establish Nodal expression in the LPM, the position of the stomach is L–R randomized in association with asplenia or hyposplenia in the abdomen, whereas right isomerism of the lung and atrium is apparent in the thorax in association in about half of neonates with dextrocardia or mesocardia (24). Of note, Cryptic−/− neonates manifest CHDs, including transposition of the great arteries (TGA) and atrial septal defect (ASD). TGA associated with right isomerism has also been described in Nodal mutants (19, 37). Pitx2c, whose expression is induced by Nodal, plays a fundamental role in heart morphogenesis. Pitx2 mutant mice thus develop double-outlet right ventricle (DORV), complete atrioventricular canal defect (CAVC), ASD, and ventricular septal defect (20⇓⇓–23, 25, 26). Unfortunately, given that the culture period that can support embryonic development is limited, it was not possible to determine which type of CHDs would become manifest in embryos cultured in high-glucose medium. The loss of Nodal expression in the LPM of these embryos, however, would be expected to result in TGA and DORV associated with heterotaxia based on right isomerism. In support of this notion, DORV, TGA, and CAVC associated with right isomerism are often apparent in fetuses of female nonobese diabetic mice (17). On the other hand, cases of heterotaxia in offspring of human diabetic mothers include left isomerism (50). The mechanism underlying the development of such left isomerism remains unknown.

Nodal expression spreads in the left LPM to provide L–R axis information to precursor cells of visceral organs that are constructed along the anteroposterior axis of embryos. The heart primordium at the anterior end of the LPM is the cell population that receives the Nodal signal last. Nodal expression expands in the LPM at the four-somite stage, when the heart primordium is crescent-shaped. Its morphology subsequently undergoes a marked change associated with the formation of the heart tube and loops. The time course of Nodal expression indicates that the heart primordium receives the Nodal signal at a specific stage of heart development. Given that high glucose reduces Nodal activity in the node, hyperglycemia at a threshold level may delay Nodal expression in LPM rather than completely abolish it. Although it is not known whether such a delay in Nodal expansion in the LPM would affect heart morphogenesis, the precise area of Pitx2c expression might not be established in the heart primordium at more advanced stages. This scenario would be expected to give rise to CHDs without laterality defects of visceral organs. In support of this notion, four embryos with l-loop derived from dams with streptozotocin-induced diabetes were found to have lost Pitx2 expression in the outflow tract but not in the left LPM. In these embryos, the heart primordium might not have received the Nodal signal as a result of delayed Nodal extension in the left LPM. Given that the direction of heart looping is randomized in the absence of Nodal signaling, d-loop would also be expected to occur in embryos that express Pitx2 only in the left LPM, although we did not detect such embryos in the present study. Of note, we also observed that four embryos with l-loop expressed Pitx2 in the left outflow tract and LPM (Fig. 1 C and G). In these embryos, the spread of Nodal expression in the LPM might not have reached the heart primordium before the looping event, with Nodal signaling not occurring in the left side of the heart tube until later. Alternatively, glucose might directly inhibit the Nodal-dependent looping process but not the induction of Pitx2 by the Nodal signal. If this is the case, threshold glucose concentrations would permit Nodal expression in the left LPM, but the looping would be randomized, albeit in the presence of Pitx2 expression in the left heart primordium. Various types of CHDs, including conotruncal malformations, ASD, and ventricular septal defect have been described in human offspring of diabetic mothers. It will be important to address whether such human CHDs without laterality defects are caused by delayed Nodal expression in the LPM.

Human pregestational DM is associated with multiple defects (4). Although apoptosis induced by oxidative stress likely accounts for neural tube defects and persistent truncus arteriosus (9), the pathogenic mechanisms underlying many defects have remained unclear. We have now shown that Notch signaling is affected by high glucose, suggesting that the multiple defects associated with diabetic pregnancy may be explained by impairment of separate developmental processes and different signaling cascades. Notch signaling plays a key role in various processes of development, and its disturbance causes human congenital defects, including CHDs and skeletal abnormalities (51). It will thus be important to investigate whether Notch signaling is affected in developmental processes other than L–R axis formation in diabetic embryopathy. Of note, we also found that the somites of high-glucose embryos are smaller along the anteroposterior axis compared with those in control embryos. The smaller somites observed in high-glucose embryos might possibly be related to the observation that the risk for costovertebral defects and VACTERL (vertebral defects, anal atresia, cardiac defects, tracheo-esophageal fistula, renal anomalies, and limb abnormalities) is increased in human diabetic embryopathy (52). Somitogenesis is regulated by oscillation of Notch signaling in presomitic mesoderm (49). Given that the expression pattern for cNICD1 itself appeared normal in presomitic mesoderm of high-glucose embryos at the resolution level of our experiments, the reason why somitogenesis is affected is unclear. A Notch reporter assay performed in HEK293T cells failed to reveal a suppressive effect of high glucose on reporter activity (Fig. S2), suggesting that the suppression of Notch signaling by high glucose might depend on cell type.

Fig. S2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. S2.

Notch reporter assay for HEK293T cells cultured in high-glucose medium. (A) HEK293T cells were cultured in the presence of 50 μM DAPT for 72 h before as well as during transfection with a Notch reporter (12RE) or control plasmid, after which cell lysates were assayed for luciferase activity. (B) The transfected cells were cultured in medium containing glucose at 100, 450, or 850 mg/dL for 24 h, after which cell lysates were assayed for luciferase activity. All data are means ± SD for three independent experiments.

Materials and Methods

Mice.

Imprinting control region mice were mated to obtain embryos. Noon of the day on which a vaginal plug was detected was designated as E0.5. Dams at E3.5 were injected intraperitoneally with streptozotocin (200 µg per gram of body weight) (Wako) to induce type 1 DM. Food (CR-LPF, Oriental Yeast) intake was limited to 5 g/d beginning 3 d after the injection, and 5% (wt/vol) glucose solution was given as drinking water from E7.5. Control female mice were fed at libitum until E6.5 and at 5 g/d thereafter. The pregnant female mice were killed by cervical dislocation to collect embryos at the indicated stages. The blood glucose concentration of streptozotocin-treated mice was measured with a glucometer (Glucose Pilot, Aventir Biotech). The study was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Kyushu University.

Whole-Embryo Culture.

Embryos were removed from the decidua in DMEM supplemented with 10% (vol/vol) FBS. After removal of Reichert’s membrane, the developmental stage was determined on the basis of morphological criteria. Three to nine embryos at the early to late head-fold stage were transferred to a 50-mL conical tube containing 1 mL of DMEM with a d-glucose concentration of 100 mg/dL and supplemented with 75% (vol/vol) rat serum. The embryos were then subjected to rotation culture at 37 °C in a humidified incubator containing 5% CO2. The glucose concentration of the culture medium as measured with a glucometer (GF501, TANITA) was 144 ± 16.5 mg/dL, depending on the lot of rat serum (mean ± SD for 32 lots). For high-glucose culture, d-glucose was added to the medium up to a final measured concentration of 720 mg/dL. For long-term culture (48 h), the medium was replaced with fresh every 12 h after the initial 14 h. Where indicated, some embryos were returned to control medium after the initial 14 h of high-glucose culture. High-glucose culture was always performed simultaneously with control culture.

ES Cell Culture.

Mouse ES cells (G4) were cultured in a gelatin-coated dish with 2i + LIF culture medium (53). The medium was based on DMEM containing d-glucose at 450 mg/dL. For high-glucose culture, ES cells were incubated for 12 h in medium containing d-glucose at 850 mg/dL SB431542 (Sigma-Aldrich) was added to the basal medium to a final concentration of 10 µM to suppress Nodal-Activin signaling.

Local Transfection of Embryos.

Lipofection solution (Lipofectamine2000, Invitrogen) containing Nodal and GFP expression vectors was injected in the right posterior mesoderm with the use of a glass capillary connected to an injector (Narishige) (27). Injected embryos were then developed by whole-embryo culture.

Whole-Mount in Situ Hybridization.

Embryos were fixed overnight with 4% (wt/vol) paraformaldehyde in PBS and then subjected to whole-mount in situ hybridization according to standard protocols. In brief, fixed embryos were treated with PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 (PBST) and dehydrated with increasing concentrations of methanol. After exposure to 6% (vol/vol) H2O2 in methanol, the embryos were rehydrated with PBST, treated first with proteinase K (10 µg/mL) in PBST and then with glycine (2 mg/mL) in PBST, and fixed again with 4% paraformaldehyde and 0.2% glutaraldehyde in PBST. After prehybridization, the embryos were incubated overnight with hybridization solution containing the various digoxigenin-labeled probes, washed extensively, treated with RNase A (50 µg/mL), and washed again. They were then exposed to 10% (vol/vol) sheep serum, incubated overnight with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated antibodies to digoxigenin (Roche), and washed extensively, after which the color was developed with nitroblue tetrazolium and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-phosphate. Probes included those for Pitx2, Nodal, Lefty1, Lefty2, Uncx, Gdf1, Cryptic, Cerl2, Shh, Foxa2, Foxj1, Notch1, and Notch2.

Immunostaining of Whole Embryos.

Embryos were fixed for 20 min at 4 °C with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS, washed with Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween 20 (TBST), treated with 100% methanol, and rehydrated with TBST. For the immunodetection of pSmad2, the embryos were bleached with 10% H2O2 in methanol for 20 min after the treatment with 100% methanol. Nonspecific sites were blocked by incubation for 30 min with 0.5% TSA Blocking Reagent (Perkin-Elmer). The embryos were then incubated with rabbit primary antibodies to cNICD1 (#2421, Cell Signaling), to the COOH terminus of Notch1 (sc-6014, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), or to pSmad2 (#3101, Cell Signaling), all of which were diluted with blocking buffer (1:50). After washing with TBST, the embryos were incubated with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated goat antibodies to rabbit IgG (Molecular Probes) and with TO-PRO3 (Molecular Probes) to detect nuclei. Immunostaining of control and high-glucose embryos was always performed simultaneously. Confocal images were acquired with a Leica TCS SP5 system, and fluorescence of Alexa Fluor 488 and TO-PRO3 was converted to red and blue colors, respectively.

Quantitation of Immunofluorescence.

Crown cells of the node were identified by 3D projection of TO-PRO3 confocal images (Leica LAS AF). Crown cells adjacent to the depression of the node were then marked on the z-stacked images as the region of interest (depth of 18 μm), for which eight-bit pixel intensities of Alexa Fluor 488 and TO-PRO3 fluorescence were measured with the “Analyze Particles” function of ImageJ. The pixel intensities of crown cells on both sides of the node were summed and averaged. The averaged value of Alexa Fluor 488 was then divided by that of TO-PRO3 to correct for the bias because of the distance between the coverslip and the specimen.

Statistical Analysis.

The Wilcoxon rank sum test (R package) for comparison of immunofluorescence intensity or two-tailed Fisher’s exact probability test for the other experiments was performed according to the null hypothesis of there being no differences between control and high-glucose embryos. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

SI Materials and Methods

Observation of Nodal Flow.

The node region dissected from embryos cultured from the head-fold stage for 6 h was placed in a chamber formed by a silicone sheet with a hole placed on a slide glass. The chamber was filled with Hepes-buffered DMEM supplemented with 10% (vol/vol) FBS and containing 1.0-μm microspheres (Polysciences). Movement of the microspheres was observed with an inverted microscope (Nikon Ti).

Scanning Electron Microscopy.

After observation of nodal flow, the node was fixed with 2.5% (vol/vol) glutaraldehyde and 1% osmium(VIII) oxide, dehydrated by exposure to a series of ethanol solutions of increasing concentration, and freeze-dried in t-butanol (VFD-21S, Vacuum Device). The dried tissue was coated with Au-Pd (E-1045, Hitachi) and observed with a scanning electron microscope (TM3000, Hitachi).

Luciferase Assay.

The 12RE/Notch signal reporter plasmid was generated by cloning six tandem repeats of EBNA2RE (54) into pGL4.23 (Promega). The 12RE reporter vector (containing 12 RBP-J binding sites) and pGL4.74 (Promega) as an internal control were simultaneously introduced into HEK293T cells by transfection with the use of the FuGENE HD reagent (Roche). To confirm the specificity of the 12RE reporter, we treated cells with the γ-secretase inhibitor DAPT (50 μM) for 72 h before and during transfection. The transfected cells were also exposed to medium containing d-glucose (100, 450, or 850 mg/dL) for 24 h, after which luciferase activity was measured with the use of a Dual Luciferase Assay System (Promega) and FlexStation3 instrument (Molecular Devices). The activity of firefly luciferase was normalized by that of Renilla luciferase.

Acknowledgments

We thank Y. Honda for technical assistance; Y. Saga and D. Watanabe for advice on immunohistofluorescence analysis and preparation of samples for scanning electron microscopy, respectively; A. Nagy and M. Gertsenstein for providing G4 embryonic stem cells; and the Research Support Center, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, for technical support. This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan (26291051, 25670491, 26461637), as well as by the Takeda Science Foundation.

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: meno{at}dev.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp.
  • Author contributions: M.H., S.O., K. Kitajima, and C.M. designed research; M.H., S.O., K. Kitajima, S.I., T.S., and C.M. performed research; M.H., S.O., K. Kitajima, T.S., K. Kato, N.W., and C.M. analyzed data; and M.H. and C.M. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1504529112/-/DCSupplemental.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Liu S, et al., Canadian Perinatal Surveillance System (Public Health Agency of Canada)
    (2013) Association between maternal chronic conditions and congenital heart defects: A population-based cohort study. Circulation 128(6):583–589
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Dolk H,
    2. Loane M,
    3. Garne E, European Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies (EUROCAT) Working Group
    (2011) Congenital heart defects in Europe: Prevalence and perinatal mortality, 2000 to 2005. Circulation 123(8):841–849
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Jenkins KJ, et al., American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young
    (2007) Noninherited risk factors and congenital cardiovascular defects: Current knowledge: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young: Endorsed by the American Academy of Pediatrics. Circulation 115(23):2995–3014
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Correa A, et al.
    (2008) Diabetes mellitus and birth defects. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199(3):237.e1–237.e9
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Cockroft DL,
    2. Coppola PT
    (1977) Teratogenic effects of excess glucose on head-fold rat embryos in culture. Teratology 16(2):141–146
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Sadler TW
    (1980) Effects of maternal diabetes on early embryogenesis: II. Hyperglycemia-induced exencephaly. Teratology 21(3):349–356
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Horton WE Jr,
    2. Sadler TW
    (1983) Effects of maternal diabetes on early embryogenesis. Alterations in morphogenesis produced by the ketone body, B-hydroxybutyrate. Diabetes 32(7):610–616
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Brownlee M
    (2001) Biochemistry and molecular cell biology of diabetic complications. Nature 414(6865):813–820
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Zabihi S,
    2. Loeken MR
    (2010) Understanding diabetic teratogenesis: Where are we now and where are we going? Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 88(10):779–790
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Phelan SA,
    2. Ito M,
    3. Loeken MR
    (1997) Neural tube defects in embryos of diabetic mice: Role of the Pax-3 gene and apoptosis. Diabetes 46(7):1189–1197
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Chang TI, et al.
    (2003) Oxidant regulation of gene expression and neural tube development: Insights gained from diabetic pregnancy on molecular causes of neural tube defects. Diabetologia 46(4):538–545
    .
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Morgan SC,
    2. Relaix F,
    3. Sandell LL,
    4. Loeken MR
    (2008) Oxidative stress during diabetic pregnancy disrupts cardiac neural crest migration and causes outflow tract defects. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 82(6):453–463
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Pani L,
    2. Horal M,
    3. Loeken MR
    (2002) Rescue of neural tube defects in Pax-3-deficient embryos by p53 loss of function: Implications for Pax-3–dependent development and tumorigenesis. Genes Dev 16(6):676–680
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Morgan SC, et al.
    (2008) Cardiac outflow tract septation failure in Pax3-deficient embryos is due to p53-dependent regulation of migrating cardiac neural crest. Mech Dev 125(9-10):757–767
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Martínez-Frías ML
    (2001) Heterotaxia as an outcome of maternal diabetes: An epidemiological study. Am J Med Genet 99(2):142–146
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Lisowski LA, et al.
    (2010) Congenital heart disease in pregnancies complicated by maternal diabetes mellitus. An international clinical collaboration, literature review, and meta-analysis. Herz 35(1):19–26
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Morishima M,
    2. Yasui H,
    3. Ando M,
    4. Nakazawa M,
    5. Takao A
    (1996) Influence of genetic and maternal diabetes in the pathogenesis of visceroatrial heterotaxy in mice. Teratology 54(4):183–190
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Hamada H,
    2. Meno C,
    3. Watanabe D,
    4. Saijoh Y
    (2002) Establishment of vertebrate left-right asymmetry. Nat Rev Genet 3(2):103–113
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Lowe LA,
    2. Yamada S,
    3. Kuehn MR
    (2001) Genetic dissection of nodal function in patterning the mouse embryo. Development 128(10):1831–1843
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract
  20. ↵
    1. Yashiro K,
    2. Shiratori H,
    3. Hamada H
    (2007) Haemodynamics determined by a genetic programme govern asymmetric development of the aortic arch. Nature 450(7167):285–288
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Shiratori H,
    2. Yashiro K,
    3. Shen MM,
    4. Hamada H
    (2006) Conserved regulation and role of Pitx2 in situs-specific morphogenesis of visceral organs. Development 133(15):3015–3025
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Gage PJ,
    2. Suh H,
    3. Camper SA
    (1999) Dosage requirement of Pitx2 for development of multiple organs. Development 126(20):4643–4651
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract
  23. ↵
    1. Kitamura K, et al.
    (1999) Mouse Pitx2 deficiency leads to anomalies of the ventral body wall, heart, extra- and periocular mesoderm and right pulmonary isomerism. Development 126(24):5749–5758
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract
  24. ↵
    1. Yan YT, et al.
    (1999) Conserved requirement for EGF-CFC genes in vertebrate left-right axis formation. Genes Dev 13(19):2527–2537
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Lin CR, et al.
    (1999) Pitx2 regulates lung asymmetry, cardiac positioning and pituitary and tooth morphogenesis. Nature 401(6750):279–282
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Liu C, et al.
    (2002) Pitx2c patterns anterior myocardium and aortic arch vessels and is required for local cell movement into atrioventricular cushions. Development 129(21):5081–5091
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Yamamoto M, et al.
    (2003) Nodal signaling induces the midline barrier by activating Nodal expression in the lateral plate. Development 130(9):1795–1804
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Collignon J,
    2. Varlet I,
    3. Robertson EJ
    (1996) Relationship between asymmetric nodal expression and the direction of embryonic turning. Nature 381(6578):155–158
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Lowe LA, et al.
    (1996) Conserved left-right asymmetry of nodal expression and alterations in murine situs inversus. Nature 381(6578):158–161
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Oki S, et al.
    (2007) Sulfated glycosaminoglycans are necessary for Nodal signal transmission from the node to the left lateral plate in the mouse embryo. Development 134(21):3893–3904
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Tanaka C,
    2. Sakuma R,
    3. Nakamura T,
    4. Hamada H,
    5. Saijoh Y
    (2007) Long-range action of Nodal requires interaction with GDF1. Genes Dev 21(24):3272–3282
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Marques S, et al.
    (2004) The activity of the Nodal antagonist Cerl-2 in the mouse node is required for correct L/R body axis. Genes Dev 18(19):2342–2347
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Kawasumi A, et al.
    (2011) Left-right asymmetry in the level of active Nodal protein produced in the node is translated into left-right asymmetry in the lateral plate of mouse embryos. Dev Biol 353(2):321–330
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Nakamura T, et al.
    (2006) Generation of robust left-right asymmetry in the mouse embryo requires a self-enhancement and lateral-inhibition system. Dev Cell 11(4):495–504
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Oki S, et al.
    (2009) Reversal of left-right asymmetry induced by aberrant Nodal signaling in the node of mouse embryos. Development 136(23):3917–3925
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Saijoh Y, et al.
    (2000) Left-right asymmetric expression of lefty2 and nodal is induced by a signaling pathway that includes the transcription factor FAST2. Mol Cell 5(1):35–47
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Brennan J,
    2. Norris DP,
    3. Robertson EJ
    (2002) Nodal activity in the node governs left-right asymmetry. Genes Dev 16(18):2339–2344
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Norris DP,
    2. Brennan J,
    3. Bikoff EK,
    4. Robertson EJ
    (2002) The Foxh1-dependent autoregulatory enhancer controls the level of Nodal signals in the mouse embryo. Development 129(14):3455–3468
    .
    OpenUrlPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Shiratori H, et al.
    (2001) Two-step regulation of left-right asymmetric expression of Pitx2: Initiation by nodal signaling and maintenance by Nkx2. Mol Cell 7(1):137–149
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Furtado MB,
    2. Biben C,
    3. Shiratori H,
    4. Hamada H,
    5. Harvey RP
    (2011) Characterization of Pitx2c expression in the mouse heart using a reporter transgene. Dev Dyn 240(1):195–203
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Lu MF,
    2. Pressman C,
    3. Dyer R,
    4. Johnson RL,
    5. Martin JF
    (1999) Function of Rieger syndrome gene in left-right asymmetry and craniofacial development. Nature 401(6750):276–278
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Meno C, et al.
    (1998) Lefty-1 is required for left-right determination as a regulator of lefty-2 and nodal. Cell 94(3):287–297
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Meno C, et al.
    (2001) Diffusion of nodal signaling activity in the absence of the feedback inhibitor Lefty2. Dev Cell 1(1):127–138
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Ogawa K, et al.
    (2007) Activin-Nodal signaling is involved in propagation of mouse embryonic stem cells. J Cell Sci 120(Pt 1):55–65
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    1. Alten L, et al.
    (2012) Differential regulation of node formation, nodal ciliogenesis and cilia positioning by Noto and Foxj1. Development 139(7):1276–1284
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    1. Raya A, et al.
    (2003) Notch activity induces Nodal expression and mediates the establishment of left-right asymmetry in vertebrate embryos. Genes Dev 17(10):1213–1218
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    1. Krebs LT, et al.
    (2003) Notch signaling regulates left-right asymmetry determination by inducing Nodal expression. Genes Dev 17(10):1207–1212
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    1. Kitajima K,
    2. Oki S,
    3. Ohkawa Y,
    4. Sumi T,
    5. Meno C
    (2013) Wnt signaling regulates left-right axis formation in the node of mouse embryos. Dev Biol 380(2):222–232
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Saga Y
    (2012) The mechanism of somite formation in mice. Curr Opin Genet Dev 22(4):331–338
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Splitt M,
    2. Wright C,
    3. Sen D,
    4. Goodship J
    (1999) Left-isomerism sequence and maternal type-1 diabetes. Lancet 354(9175):305–306
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Penton AL,
    2. Leonard LD,
    3. Spinner NB
    (2012) Notch signaling in human development and disease. Semin Cell Dev Biol 23(4):450–457
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Castori M
    (2013) Diabetic embryopathy: A developmental perspective from fertilization to adulthood. Mol Syndromol 4(1-2):74–86
    .
    OpenUrlPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Ying QL, et al.
    (2008) The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nature 453(7194):519–523
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Höfelmayr H, et al.
    (1999) Activated mouse Notch1 transactivates Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 2-regulated viral promoters. J Virol 73(4):2770–2780
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Hyperglycemia impairs left–right axis formation and thereby disturbs heart morphogenesis in mouse embryos
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Hyperglycemia and congenital heart defects
Masahiro Hachisuga, Shinya Oki, Keiko Kitajima, Satomi Ikuta, Tomoyuki Sumi, Kiyoko Kato, Norio Wake, Chikara Meno
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Sep 2015, 112 (38) E5300-E5307; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1504529112

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Hyperglycemia and congenital heart defects
Masahiro Hachisuga, Shinya Oki, Keiko Kitajima, Satomi Ikuta, Tomoyuki Sumi, Kiyoko Kato, Norio Wake, Chikara Meno
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Sep 2015, 112 (38) E5300-E5307; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1504529112
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Article Classifications

  • Biological Sciences
  • Medical Sciences
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 112 (38)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • SI Materials and Methods
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Smoke emanates from Japan’s Fukushima nuclear power plant a few days after tsunami damage
Core Concept: Muography offers a new way to see inside a multitude of objects
Muons penetrate much further than X-rays, they do essentially zero damage, and they are provided for free by the cosmos.
Image credit: Science Source/Digital Globe.
Water from a faucet fills a glass.
News Feature: How “forever chemicals” might impair the immune system
Researchers are exploring whether these ubiquitous fluorinated molecules might worsen infections or hamper vaccine effectiveness.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Dmitry Naumov.
Venus flytrap captures a fly.
Journal Club: Venus flytrap mechanism could shed light on how plants sense touch
One protein seems to play a key role in touch sensitivity for flytraps and other meat-eating plants.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Kuttelvaserova Stuchelova.
Illustration of groups of people chatting
Exploring the length of human conversations
Adam Mastroianni and Daniel Gilbert explore why conversations almost never end when people want them to.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Panda bear hanging in a tree
How horse manure helps giant pandas tolerate cold
A study finds that giant pandas roll in horse manure to increase their cold tolerance.
Image credit: Fuwen Wei.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Cozzarelli Prize
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490