Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology

cKit+ cardiac progenitors of neural crest origin

Konstantinos E. Hatzistergos, Lauro M. Takeuchi, Dieter Saur, Barbara Seidler, Susan M. Dymecki, Jia Jia Mai, Ian A. White, Wayne Balkan, Rosemeire M. Kanashiro-Takeuchi, Andrew V. Schally, and Joshua M. Hare
PNAS October 20, 2015 112 (42) 13051-13056; published ahead of print October 5, 2015 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517201112
Konstantinos E. Hatzistergos
aInterdisciplinary Stem Cell Institute, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lauro M. Takeuchi
aInterdisciplinary Stem Cell Institute, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dieter Saur
bDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mediziniche Klinik und Policlinik Der Technischen Universitat Munchen, Munich 81675, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Barbara Seidler
bDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mediziniche Klinik und Policlinik Der Technischen Universitat Munchen, Munich 81675, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susan M. Dymecki
cDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jia Jia Mai
cDepartment of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ian A. White
aInterdisciplinary Stem Cell Institute, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wayne Balkan
aInterdisciplinary Stem Cell Institute, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rosemeire M. Kanashiro-Takeuchi
aInterdisciplinary Stem Cell Institute, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136;dDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Pharmacology, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew V. Schally
eDepartment of Pathology and Medicine, University of Miami School of Medicine and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Miami, FL 33125
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jhare@miami.eduandrew.schally@va.gov
Joshua M. Hare
aInterdisciplinary Stem Cell Institute, Leonard M. Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: jhare@miami.eduandrew.schally@va.gov
  1. Contributed by Andrew V. Schally, August 29, 2015 (sent for review April 27, 2015; reviewed by Roger Joseph Hajjar)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  1. Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    cKitCreERT2/+ lineage-tracing. (A) Phenotype of cKitCreERT2/+ mice. (B) Summary of the experimental design. (C–F) administration of TAM during E7.5–E8.5 (n = 10) marks testicular (C, arrowheads), pulmonary (D) and, rarely, immature cells in the myocardium (E and F, arrowheads). (G–J) Live tissue imaging of cKitCreERT2/+ (G), IRG (H), and cKitCreERT2;IRG (I) E18.5 littermates subjected to TAM during E9.5–E11.5 (n = 7). Widespread EGFP epifluorescence in ventricles and atria (I and J), lungs (J), OFT (J, arrow), epicardium (J, arrowheads). (K–N) Lineage-tracing in cKitCreERT2;R26RlacZ mice (n = 8). (O) Summary of cKit genetic fate-mapping. Panels F and J are confocal tile-scans. Panels K–N are photomerged image tiles. (Scale bars, 10 µm in D and F; 200 µm in J; 500px in K–N.) (Magnification, 100× in C, E, and G–I.)

  2. Fig. S1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. S1.

    cKit is not expressed in the embryonic myocardium at the time of TAM administration. (A) Colocalization of X-gal with anti-cKit immunohistochemistry (arrow) in an E13.5 NT of a cKitCreERT2/R26RlacZ embryo. (Magnification, 200×.) Inset depicts a higher-magnification image of the indicated cell. (B) Live embryo imaging of EGFP and DsRed epifluorescence in an E12.5 cKitCreERT2;IRG embryo. Two EGFP+ cells are detected in proximity to the OFT and two more in the epicardium (arrows). EGFP expression is absent in the myocardium. In contrast, strong expression of EGFP is seen in the NT and the skin. (C–F) A transverse section from an E12.5 cKitCreERT2;IRG mouse embryo in which immunohistochemistry against EGFP has been performed. EGFP cells are detected in the skin (Inset 1 and D in higher magnification), neural tube (Inset 2 and E in higher magnification), and the conotruncus (Inset 3 and F in higher magnification). No EGFP signal is detected in the myocardium. (G and H) A transverse section of an E12.5 cKitCreERT2;IRG heart illustrating expression of EGFP in the epicardium and left atrium. No signal is detected in the myocardium. Panel B is a photomerged image tile. (Magnification, 100×/tile.) Panel C is a confocal tile-scan. Ht, Heart. (Scale bars, 10 µm in D–F, and 100 µm in G–H.)

  3. Fig. S2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. S2.

    Expression of cKit in the cKit+/+ developing mouse heart. Representative confocal immunofluorescence of cKit antibody localization in E14.5 wild-type mouse embryos. (A) Consistent with cKitCreERT2/+ genetic fate map, CNCkit (red fluorescence) are detected in the NT, DRG, as well as in the dermis. CNCkit are detected in proximity of both the dorsolateral (arrows) and ventral (arrowheads) sites of the NT. (B) cKit expression in the embryonic lungs, RA, OFT, and epicardium (boxes). (C) Magnification of the solid box in B, highlights CNCkit (arrowheads) in the RA appendage, pericardial and epicardial walls. (D) Magnification of the dashed box in B, highlights CNCkit (arrowheads) accessing the RA, epicardium, and OFT. (E) CNCkit are dispersed in dermis, parietal pericardium, epicardium, and cardiac ventricular walls. (F) Magnification of the boxed area in E, illustrates CNCkit accessing the LV through the pericardial (arrows) and epicardial (arrowheads) walls. (Scale bars, 100 µm in A and 10 µm in B–F.) RA, right atrium; RV, right ventricle.

  4. Fig. S3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. S3.

    cKit immunohistochemistry labels weakly expressing tdTomato+ cells in Wnt1-Cre;RC::tdTomato mouse embryos. Confocal immunofluorescence analysis following anti-cKit immunohistochemistry in E12.5 Wnt1-Cre;RC::tdTomato embryos illustrates colocalization of cKit in a population of cells with weak tdTomato epifluorescence, located dorsally (A, arrows) and ventrally from the NT (B, arrow), as well as within the outflow tract (C, arrows). A total of n = 3 Wnt1-Cre;RC::tdTomato embryos were analyzed. (Scale bars, 20 µm.)

  5. Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Intersectional genetic fate-mapping of cKit and Wnt1. (A) schematic of the two different approaches of the study. (B–D) Live epifluorescence imaging (B), followed by salmon-gal histochemical detection of nLacZ (C and D), in an E10.5 cKitCreERT2;RC::Fela embryo exposed to TAM during E8.5–E9.5. The flp- and intersectional indicators are not expressed in the absence of Flpe and Flpe/Cre-mediated recombination, respectively. (E–H) A Wnt1::Flpe;cKitCreERT2;RC::Fela littermate exhibits widespread GFP epifluorescence (E) and a few salmon-gal+ cells in the NT and heart. (I–L) Live embryo imaging of mCherry and GFP epifluorescence in a E17.5 Wnt1::Flpe;cKitCreERT2;RC::Frepe embryo. EGFP+ CNCkit in the craniofacial region (I), skin (J), OFT (K), and the epicardial wall of the heart (L). (M and T) X-gal+ CNCkit derivatives in the OFT (M and G), heart (N, O, R, and S), and epicardium (P and T) of E17.5 Wnt1::Flpe;cKitCreERT2;RC::Fela embryos. Arrows in M–P are depicted in higher magnification in panels Q–T, respectively. Panels B, E are photomerged image tiles. OFT, outflow tract; Ht, heart; Lu, lung. (Scale bars, 50 µm in M–P and 300px in I–L.) (Magnification, 100× in B–H and Q–T.)

  6. Fig. S4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. S4.

    Intersectional genetic fate map of cKit and Wnt1. A-C, Wnt1::Flpe4351 reliably marks the cardiac neural crest as indicated by the expression of EGFP in the OFT (A), epicardium (B), and myocardium (C) of an E18.5 Wnt1::Flpe;Rc::Fela heart. (D–I) When both Wnt1::Flpe and cKitCreERT2/+ become activated in cKitCreERT2;Wnt1::Flpe;Rc::Fela embryos, expression of EGFP is still widely expressed in the NC derivatives, including melanoblasts (D, arrows), DRGs (E), and OFT (G). In addition, a population of nLacZ+ cells are also present within the skin (F, arrows), DRGs (F, arrowheads), OFT (H) and, rarely, within the compact myocardium (I). [Scale bars, 100 µm (A, D, and E), 10 µm (B and C), 20 µm (G) and 80 µm (I).] (Magnification, 100× in H.)

  7. Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Heart derivatives of CNCkit. (A and B) Colocalization of X-gal with SM1 (arrowhead) and Pecam1 (arrows) in the OFT. (C) X-gal+ cells (arrowhead) within the aortic tunica media. (D) EGFP+ derivatives within the mitral valve (arrowhead) and aortic valve (arrow). (E) EGFP+ derivatives in the aortic valve (arrowheads). (F) CNCkit are associated with, but do not contribute to, coronary vasculature. (G) EGFP+/cmlc2v+ ventricular cardiac myocytes. (H) EGFP+ cardiac derivatives coexpress Gata4+. (I and J) EGFP+ pericardium (arrows), epicardium (arrowheads), and endocardium (J, yellow arrow). (K) Cardiomyocytic versus noncardiomyocytic EGFP+ derivatives in the heart. (L) Distribution of EGFP+ cells in the heart [n = 3 embryos; 11 sections (K and L)]. AoV, aortic valve; CM, cardiomyocytes; cmlc2v, cardiac muscle light chain 2v; LA, left atrium; LV, left ventricle; LCA, left coronary artery; MV, mitral valve; SM1, smooth muscle myosin heavy chain. Values represent means ± SEM.

  8. Fig. S5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. S5.

    CNCkit derivatives in the heart and their identity. (A) Tilescan image illustrating extensive contribution of EGFP+ CNCkit derivatives in the lung, IFT, atria, ventricles and OFT. Notably, EGFP+ cells are consistently detected to be closely associated with BFABP+ satellite glial progenitors. Occasionally, EGFP and BFABP colocalize, illustrating that CNCkit contribute to glia and glial progenitor lineages (B, boxed area). (C and D) Higher magnification of the IFT from A, illustrating extensive contribution from CNCkit. BFABP, brain fatty acid-binding protein; IFT, inflow tract; LA, left atrium; LV, left ventricle; RA, right atrium; RV, right ventricle.

  9. Fig. S6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. S6.

    Wnt1-expressing CNCs contribute cardiomyocytes in the murine heart. Similar to the CNCkit derivatives, confocal microscopy of tdTomato (epifluorescence; pseudocolored green) in postnatal day 1 (PN1) Wnt1-Cre;RC::tdTomato mouse hearts illustrates that the Wnt1-expressing CNCs contribute extensively in the OFT (A, arrowheads), tricuspid valve (A, arrow), and mitral valve (B, arrows). In addition, tdTomato+ cells are detected within the ventricular myocardium (C, arrows, and D; yellow Inset) and epicardium (D, arrowheads). Immunostaining against the cardiomyocyte-specific marker cmlc2v illustrates that, similar to the CNCkit, the Wnt1-expressing CNCs contribute both noncardiomyocytes (C, arrows; tdTomato+/cmlc2v−) and fully differentiated cardiomyocytes (D, Inset; tdTomato+/cmlc2v+) in the mouse ventricle. (E–G) Higher magnification of the tdTomato+/cmlc2v+ clone of ventricular cardiomyocytes in the yellow Inset in D. (Scale bars, 20 µm.)

  10. Fig. S7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. S7.

    Mitf and Isl1 expression in CNCkit. (A) EGFP+ melanoblasts in the skin (arrows) coexpress Mitf. (B) EGFP+ derivatives in the heart (arrowhead, Inset) coexpress Mitf. (C) Tyrosinase+ melanocytes in the tricuspid valve (arrows) do not colocalize with EGFP (arrowheads). (D) Colocalization of X-gal and EGFP epifluorescence in cKitCreERT2;IRG;Isl1nLacZ embryos. (Magnification, 100×.) (E) X-gal and EGFP colocalization in the NT (Inset, 1) and DRGs (arrows, 2). (F) X-gal and EGFP colocalization (1, 2, arrows) in the OFT. (G) Colocalization of EGFP and β-gal in the NT, DRGs, and OFT (arrow). (H) EGFP and β-gal colocalization in NT and DRGs. (I) EGFP+/β-gal+ neurons (arrows) in the NT. (J) Higher magnification of the OFT in (G, arrow). [Scale bars, 10 µm (B, C, E, F, I, J), 100 μm (G), and 20 µm (A and H).]

  11. Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Transient BMP antagonism in iPSCkit induces CNCkit and suppresses the epicardium. (A) Schematic of the experimental approach. (B) Quantification of the percentage of beating EBs, and the percentage of beating EBs that are EGFP+ following Cre-recombination. (C) Live fluorescent imaging of a vehicle-treated spontaneously beating EB, coexpressing EGFP and DsRed. (D and E) Confocal microscopy of EBs following treatment with AA (D) or Dorso (E), illustrates that the EGFP+ cKitCreERT2/+ derivatives within the EBs are cTnnT+ cardiomyocytes. (F) Gene-expression analysis of Brachyury during the time-course of iPSCkit differentiation into cardiomyocytes following treatment with vehicle, Dorso, or NOG. (G) Comparison of the expression profiles of cardiac mesoderm- and CNC-related genes in day 11 EBs, in response to treatment with vehicle, AA, or Dorso. Compared with controls, AA and Dorso enhance cardiomyogenesis via a significant induction in CNC-related genes while suppressing proepicardial and endothelial progenitor genes. In addition, Dorso significantly enhances the expression of ISL1 and NKX2.5. cTnnt, cardiac troponin T; values represent means ± SEM.

  12. Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Derivation of CNCkit from mouse iPSCs. (A–C) Representative confocal immunofluorescence images illustrating EGFP+/NKX2.5+ derivatives within cTnnT+ EBs of vehicle-treated (A), AA-treated (B), or Dorso-treated (C) iPSCkit. Note that several of the EGFP+ cells in the vehicle- and AA-treated groups are NKX2.5− (asterisks). (Insets) Higher magnification. (D) Quantitation of EGFP+/NKX2.5+ cells between groups (n = 9 per group). Values represent means ± SEM.

  13. Fig. S8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. S8.

    Transient BMP antagonism induces CNCkit and suppresses epicardium. (A–J) NOG promotes the generation of cardiac mesoderm from iPSCkit as indicated by the transient induction of Mesp1 (A) and up-regulation in the expression of Nkx2.5 (B) and Isl1 (C) at ∼EB- day 7. Subsequently, establishment of cardiac mesoderm is followed by the induction of CNC at ∼EB day 10, as indicated by the dramatic up-regulation in the expression of cKit (D), Pax3 (E), Wnt1 (F), SNAI2 (G), and Mitf-H (H). Notably, the noncardiac variants of Mitf (variants 1 and 2) remain unchanged. (J–K) Expression of the proepicardial lineage markers WT1 and TBX18 is significantly repressed before reaching baseline values by EB day 10. (L) Summary of the iPSC-based lineage tracing experiments. Values represent means ± SEM. ***P < 0.0001, *P < 0.05. n = 3 per group.

  14. Fig. S9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. S9.

    Derivation of CNCkit from mouse iPSCs following NOG-mediated BMP antagonism. (A and B) A cluster of iPSCkit-derived EGFP+/Nkx2.5+, undifferentiated (cTnnT−) CNCkit (arrows) next to a cluster of non-CNCkit-derived (EGFP−) cTnnT+ differentiated cardiomyocytes. (C and D) An iPSCkit-derived CNCkit fully differentiated into cTnnT+/Nkx2.5+ cardiomyocyte (arrowhead). (E and F) Differentiation of iPSCkit-derived CNCkit into SM22a+ smooth muscle cells. (G and H) Colocalization of iPSCkit-derived CNCkit with Isl1. (I and J) iPSCkit-derived CNCkit generate Pax3+ progenitors. (K and L) EGFP+/neurofilament M+ motorneurons within a spontaneously beating EB. (M and N) An EGFP+/Tuj1+ neuron within the beating EBs. n = 3 per group. (Scale bars, 10 µm in A–F and I–N; 20 µm in G and H.)

PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
cKit+ cardiac progenitors of neural crest origin
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
Citation Tools
cKit marks cardiac neural crest progenitors
Konstantinos E. Hatzistergos, Lauro M. Takeuchi, Dieter Saur, Barbara Seidler, Susan M. Dymecki, Jia Jia Mai, Ian A. White, Wayne Balkan, Rosemeire M. Kanashiro-Takeuchi, Andrew V. Schally, Joshua M. Hare
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Oct 2015, 112 (42) 13051-13056; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1517201112

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
cKit marks cardiac neural crest progenitors
Konstantinos E. Hatzistergos, Lauro M. Takeuchi, Dieter Saur, Barbara Seidler, Susan M. Dymecki, Jia Jia Mai, Ian A. White, Wayne Balkan, Rosemeire M. Kanashiro-Takeuchi, Andrew V. Schally, Joshua M. Hare
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Oct 2015, 112 (42) 13051-13056; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1517201112
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 116 (7)
Current Issue

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • SI Materials and Methods
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Several aspects of the proposal, which aims to expand open access, require serious discussion and, in some cases, a rethink.
Opinion: “Plan S” falls short for society publishers—and for the researchers they serve
Several aspects of the proposal, which aims to expand open access, require serious discussion and, in some cases, a rethink.
Image credit: Dave Cutler (artist).
Several large or long-lived animals seem strangely resistant to developing cancer. Elucidating the reasons why could lead to promising cancer-fighting strategies in humans.
Core Concept: Solving Peto’s Paradox to better understand cancer
Several large or long-lived animals seem strangely resistant to developing cancer. Elucidating the reasons why could lead to promising cancer-fighting strategies in humans.
Image credit: Shutterstock.com/ronnybas frimages.
Featured Profile
PNAS Profile of NAS member and biochemist Hao Wu
 Nonmonogamous strawberry poison frog (Oophaga pumilio).  Image courtesy of Yusan Yang (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh).
Putative signature of monogamy
A study suggests a putative gene-expression hallmark common to monogamous male vertebrates of some species, namely cichlid fishes, dendrobatid frogs, passeroid songbirds, common voles, and deer mice, and identifies 24 candidate genes potentially associated with monogamy.
Image courtesy of Yusan Yang (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh).
Active lifestyles. Image courtesy of Pixabay/MabelAmber.
Meaningful life tied to healthy aging
Physical and social well-being in old age are linked to self-assessments of life worth, and a spectrum of behavioral, economic, health, and social variables may influence whether aging individuals believe they are leading meaningful lives.
Image courtesy of Pixabay/MabelAmber.

More Articles of This Classification

Biological Sciences

  • Structural basis for activity of TRIC counter-ion channels in calcium release
  • PGC1A regulates the IRS1:IRS2 ratio during fasting to influence hepatic metabolism downstream of insulin
  • Altered neural odometry in the vertical dimension
Show more

Medical Sciences

  • WNK4 kinase is a physiological intracellular chloride sensor
  • Antagonists of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) inhibit the growth of human malignant pleural mesothelioma
  • Stromal-derived interleukin 6 drives epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and therapy resistance in esophageal adenocarcinoma
Show more

Related Content

  • No related articles found.
  • Scopus
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited by...

  • Cardiac c-Kit Biology Revealed by Inducible Transgenesis
  • Reassessment of c-Kit in Cardiac Cells: A Complex Interplay Between Expression, Fate, and Function
  • Preclinical Studies of Stem Cell Therapy for Heart Disease
  • Pathologic Stimulus Determines Lineage Commitment of Cardiac C-kit+ Cells
  • Identity Crisis for Regenerative Cardiac cKit+ Cells
  • Polo-Like Kinase 2 is Dynamically Regulated to Coordinate Proliferation and Early Lineage Specification Downstream of Yes-Associated Protein 1 in Cardiac Progenitor Cells
  • Overcoming the Roadblocks to Cardiac Cell Therapy Using Tissue Engineering
  • Cardiac Cell Therapy 3.0: The Beginning of the End or the End of the Beginning?
  • The Elusive Progenitor Cell in Cardiac Regeneration: Slip Slidin Away
  • Pim1 Kinase Overexpression Enhances ckit+ Cardiac Stem Cell Cardiac Repair Following Myocardial Infarction in Swine
  • Complexity of Tracking the Fate of Adult Progenitor Cells
  • Stimulatory Effects of Mesenchymal Stem Cells on cKit+ Cardiac Stem Cells Are Mediated by SDF1/CXCR4 and SCF/cKit Signaling Pathways
  • Developmental origin and lineage plasticity of endogenous cardiac stem cells
  • c-kit+ Cardiac Stem Cells: Spontaneous Creation or a Perplexing Reality
  • Murine Models Demonstrate Distinct Vasculogenic and Cardiomyogenic cKit+ Lineages in the Heart
  • Pretreatment of Cardiac Stem Cells With Exosomes Derived From Mesenchymal Stem Cells Enhances Myocardial Repair
  • Most of the Dust Has Settled: cKit+ Progenitor Cells Are an Irrelevant Source of Cardiac Myocytes In Vivo
  • Scopus (44)
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive

PNAS Portals

  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Teaching Resources
  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Site Map

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2019 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490