Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
Research Article

Capillary-induced giant elastic dipoles in thin nematic films

Haifa Jeridi, Mohamed A. Gharbi, Tahar Othman, and Christophe Blanc
  1. aUniversité de Tunis El Manar, Faculté des Sciences de Tunis, LR99ES16 Laboratoire Physique de la Matière Molle et de la Modélisation Électromagnétique, 2092, Tunis, Tunisia;
  2. bDepartment of Physics, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 2T8, Canada;
  3. cLaboratoire Charles Coulomb, UMR 5521 CNRS–Université de Montpellier, Montpellier 34095, F-France

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS December 1, 2015 112 (48) 14771-14776; first published November 9, 2015; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1508865112
Haifa Jeridi
aUniversité de Tunis El Manar, Faculté des Sciences de Tunis, LR99ES16 Laboratoire Physique de la Matière Molle et de la Modélisation Électromagnétique, 2092, Tunis, Tunisia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mohamed A. Gharbi
bDepartment of Physics, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 2T8, Canada;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tahar Othman
aUniversité de Tunis El Manar, Faculté des Sciences de Tunis, LR99ES16 Laboratoire Physique de la Matière Molle et de la Modélisation Électromagnétique, 2092, Tunis, Tunisia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christophe Blanc
cLaboratoire Charles Coulomb, UMR 5521 CNRS–Université de Montpellier, Montpellier 34095, F-France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: christophe.blanc02@univ-montp2.fr
  1. Edited by Ivan I. Smalyukh, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO, and accepted by the Editorial Board October 16, 2015 (received for review May 7, 2015)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Significance

The coupling of capillarity and elasticity at liquid crystal interfaces is an emerging topic driven by the ability of both mechanisms to guide the self-assembly of microparticles into ordered structures. In this research, we explore fundamental questions about how capillary deformations at liquid crystal interfaces can affect the texture around particles captured in thin nematic films. We report for the first time, to our knowledge, the formation of giant elastic dipoles and develop a fuller understanding of their creation. The understanding of such elastocapillary effects could lead to new opportunities to control the spatial organization of colloidal particles and develop novel classes of reconfigurable materials that are highly interesting for technological applications.

Abstract

Directed and true self-assembly mechanisms in nematic liquid crystal colloids rely on specific interactions between microparticles and the topological defects of the matrix. Most ordered structures formed in thin nematic cells are thus based on elastic multipoles consisting of a particle and nearby defects. Here, we report, for the first time to our knowledge, the existence of giant elastic dipoles arising from particles dispersed in free nematic liquid crystal films. We discuss the role of capillarity and film thickness on the dimensions of the dipoles and explain their main features with a simple 2D model. Coupling of capillarity with nematic elasticity could offer ways to tune finely the spatial organization of complex colloidal systems.

  • liquid crystals
  • colloids
  • thin films
  • self-assembly
  • dispersions

Among the various systems proposed heretofore for bottom-up assemblies of solid particles, nematic liquid crystal (NLC) dispersions have attracted a lot of attention. Such systems indeed promote complex anisotropic 2D patterns that can easily resist thermal fluctuations and external perturbations (1⇓–3). The mechanisms responsible for self-assembly in nematics are now well understood. The nematic phase is a fluid with an orientational order, in which locally the molecules spontaneously align in a common direction, the director n. The imposed orientation of the molecules at the surface of solid particles (the so-called anchoring phenomenon) creates a large-scale distortion of the field n(r). Orientational elasticity, far-field alignment, and topological constraints then yield the formation of topological defects associated to the particles (4, 5). A typical system that has been extensively studied is a microsphere with a perpendicular (homeotropic) anchoring immersed in a thin planar-aligned nematic cell. Topologically equivalent to a hedgehog defect for the director field n(r), the spherical particle necessarily creates other topological defects in the uniform far-field director, such as a hyperbolic hedgehog point defect or a Saturn-ring defect (a closed disclination line). The particle–defect pair forms a neutral unit and is stable contrary to a couple of true topological defects that would annihilate. The self-assembly of particles is then explained by the residual distortion of the matrix far from the pair, which yields long-range elastic interactions between particles (5, 6). Whereas the far-distance distortion can be always treated asymptotically, the local director field around the particle depends on several parameters, such as the size and shape of the inclusion or the finite strength of the anchoring, and is accessible only via numerical approaches (7). In all cases, one observes a defect located at a close distance from the particle (of order of its size). Such a scheme is found with particles of different shapes and sizes (8, 9): When introduced in a NLC, a microparticle generates elastic distortions and topological defects in its close neighborhood, i.e., at a distance comparable to its size, and we call this particle–defect pair a common short dipole.

In this paper, we examine how capillary effects modify this scheme and can be used to tune the size of a particle–defect pair. When microspheres are deposited on a free NLC film, topological counter defects are also formed but their distance to the particles is highly sensitive to the thickness of the film. For some values, giant dipoles—for which the distance between particles and defects is 10 times to several tens of times the particle size—appear. We have explained this behavior by considering the capillary deformation of the films caused by the solid inclusions. Using spatially resolved birefringence measurements, we have quantitatively analyzed the distortion of the films and the NLC textures. Finally, we show how the competition between capillarity and nematic elasticity can be handled here in a simple way by uncoupling the effects of nematic elasticity in the transverse and lateral directions of the thin film. This work also provides a previously unidentified example of the richness of the combination of capillarity and nematic elasticity (10) for developing colloidal self-assembly mechanisms based on liquid crystals.

Results and Discussion

Thin Nematic Films.

Our experimental systems consist of thin films of nematic liquid crystal [4-n-pentyl-4′-cyanobiphenyl (5CB)] spread at the surface of a thick water layer (Fig. 1A). The degree of wetting of high-purity 5CB on pure water is insufficient to give satisfactory film-forming properties (11). We have found that adding 5 wt% of polyvinylalcohol (PVA) ensures complete wetting. After briefly heating to the isotropic state (above T=35 °C) and cooling back to room temperature, the films show a uniform thickness and are highly stable with time. This system has several advantages over the well-studied films spread on glycerin (12, 13): Due to its slight solubility in 5CB, glycerin indeed tends to form droplets in the NLC after some time (14⇓–16), disturbing the system and hindering detailed observations (17). Films containing solid microspheres with perpendicular anchoring are similarly obtained by spreading 5CB containing 0.1 wt% of silica particles of nominal radius R≈ 2 ± 0.2 μm over the PVA solution.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

(A) In a hybrid nematic film, the director n rotates between θp and θh at the interfaces. (B) This defines a polar c director field characterized by its angular orientation φ. (C) In a 10-μm-thick film, a 4-μm microsphere is accompanied by a defect located at a short distance (a possible configuration is sketched in Inset). (D) In a thinner film, a giant dipole is observed between crossed polarizers. The microsphere induces a radial director in its neighborhood (Inset) and the counter defect is found much farther away.

The 5CB NLC shows a strong perpendicular anchoring on air (13) and a degenerate parallel (planar) anchoring at the water/PVA solution (18). The difference in anchoring conditions Θ=θp−θh (Fig. 1A) leads to a continuous 3D distortion of the director n. Such hybrid anchoring nematic films (mainly studied on glycerin) have already been thoroughly examined both experimentally and theoretically (12, 13, 16, 19⇓–21). Thick films are expected to show a simple and homogeneous structure in the layer plane (defining a 2D c director sketched in Fig. 1B) but when the thickness h decreases to a fraction of microns, a spatial xy modulation of the director field and periodic domain patterns, due to an elastic instability, are observed (22, 23). We checked that the particle-free films deposited on PVA/water behave similarly. The simple uniform texture is observed down to a thickness of ∼0.4–0.5 μm and thinner films display also periodical instabilities (22). In the following, we mostly focus on films whose thickness is between 0.4 μm and 3 μm. In this range, the comparison of the retardation maps and the interference patterns in reflection mode (details in SI Text and Fig. S1) indicates that the local film thickness h is proportional to the retardation: h=δ/Δn¯ with Δn¯=0.080±0.004. This defines an effective birefringence Δn¯ slightly smaller (∼15%) than the value expected in the hypothesis of strong anchorings at both interfaces; i.e., θh=0 and θp=π/2 (SI Text). Throughout the text, we have used this experimental relation to derive the thickness profiles from the retardation maps.

Fig. S1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. S1.

Dependence of the optical retardation δ on the thickness h of a hybrid aligned nematic film of 5CB. The same 5CB lens floating on the water just after deposition is observed both in polarized reflection (A) and with the Abrio system (B). The location of destructive wave interferences observed in reflection mode is given by the condition n¯.h=jλ/2 (j∈ℕ). When the director c is perpendicular to the polarizer P, n¯=no (horizontal window in A). The measurement (B) of the corresponding optical retardation δ shows that a linear approximation δ=Δn¯h correctly describes the dependence in the range of interest (C, black triangles), with Δn¯=0.08±0.005. This value is also confirmed by the measurements when n¯=ne¯ (vertical window in A and blue circles in C). Red lines are the corresponding linear fits whereas the green curve that fits the triangles is obtained assuming weak anchoring conditions with Wh=6⋅10−5 J⋅m−2 and Wp=4⋅10−5 J⋅m−2.

Giant Elastic Dipoles.

After the deposition of particle-free films of homogeneous thickness, defects heal spontaneously in a few tens of minutes. The films show uniform thickness at equilibrium and homogeneous textures with minimal azimuthal distortion in the viewfield. On the contrary, films containing microspheres show persistent distortions that strongly depend on the film thickness. When the NLC layer is thicker than the bead diameter (typically between 4 μm and 10 μm), the distortions are localized: Individual beads are classically accompanied by a nearby hyperbolic hedgehog defect (Fig. 1C). The beads are then either confined within the film or trapped at a single interface, similarly to what has been analyzed and discussed in refs. 24 and 25, where microspheres were trapped at the air–5CB interface of films planar anchored on glass substrates. More surprisingly, when the thickness of the film decreases typically to the micrometer, giant stable dipoles are observed (Fig. 1D). The bead is equivalent to a +1 defect for the c director, which confirms (26) that perpendicular anchoring on the particle has remained strong despite the direct contact with the PVA solution. The induced defect of charge −1 is located at a distance up to ∼100 μm from the microsphere. To understand the origin of such unusual textures we have extensively studied the films and the director fields in the 0.4- to 4-μm thickness range. The bead diameter being larger than the film thickness, a capillary distortion is expected. Retardation maps reveal that the thickness of a film indeed increases in the vicinity of the particle. The deformation of the interface is roughly axisymmetric around the microsphere (Fig. 2A) and almost independent of the azimuthal director field (−1 defects have only minor influence on the film thickness). This reveals that the capillary effects largely dominate the 2D elasticity related to the distortions of the c director. However, the influence of the nematic elasticity on the interfaces should not be entirely discarded because a much larger elastic energy is stored in 3D via the hybrid anchoring conditions. At first order, the Frank elastic energy density of a hybrid NLC film indeed reduces to (27)fd=12K(∂θ∂z)2,[1]where K is the nematic splay-bend modulus in the one-constant approximation. In the limit of strong anchoring conditions with Θ=π/2, this yields a thickness-dependent surface free elastic energy Fd=Kπ2/8h (27), at the origin of a thin film disjoining pressure ΠD=−∂Fd/∂h=Kπ2/8h2. When weak anchoring conditions and an evolution of Θ with the thickness are considered (SI Text), a similar form is obtained with ΠD=−∂Fd/∂h=KΘ2/2h2.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

(A) Retardation and director field of a nematic film around a silica microsphere in a thin film. The director field reveals a strong perpendicular anchoring on the particle, equivalent to a +1 defect for the c director and the presence of a −1 defect far from the bead. The retardation has an axial symmetry, which reveals that capillary effects dominate the azimuthal elasticity. (B) Side view sketch of a microsphere embedded in a thin NLC film of thickness h0 at far distance. Capillary effects fix the contact angles ϑ1 and ϑ2, which yields a distortion h(x,y) of the interfaces. Pf(h), Pa, and Pw are the pressures in the film, in air, and in the PVA solution.

Capillary Effects.

To evaluate analytically the distortion of a film, we have considered weakly distorted interfaces and use an expansion (28) of the disjoining pressure in a thin film around the far distance thickness h0: ΠD(h)≈ΠD(h0)+∂ΠD/∂h|h0(h−h0). Using the geometric notations of Fig. 2B, the interface positions z1 and z2 check the linearized Young–Laplace equations (the gravity-induced effects are negligible at the micrometer scale and the slopes are small),Δz1=q12(z1−z2−h0)Δz2=−q22(z1−z2−h0),[2]where qi=−∂ΠD/∂h|h0/γi (i=1,2) compares the effects of disjoining pressure and of the interface tensions γ1 and γ2 (respectively for the air–5CB and the PVA/water–5CB interfaces). The axisymmetric solution gives a thickness profile (details in SI Text)h(r)=z1(r)−z2(r)=h0+AK0(qr),[3]where r is the radial distance from the bead center, q=q12+q22, and K0 is the modified Bessel function of the second kind of order 0. The constant of integration A can be determined using Young’s relation at the triple lines as a boundary condition (full analytical details in SI Text and Fig. S2). We have determined the profile of several tens of beads and found that Eq. 3 correctly describes the change of thickness around them (Fig. 3A). Moreover, it allows us to test the elastic origin of the disjoining pressure: The expression ΠD=Kπ2/8h2 yields qth=βelh0−3/2, where βel=K(γ1−1+γ2−1)π/2. This dependence is compatible with our observations as shown in Fig. 3B. The best-fitting value βfit=0.038±0.001 μm1/2 is smaller but of the same magnitude as the computed value at T=23 °C, βth=0.049 μm1/2 obtained from the average constant K≈7 pN (29), γ1=34.5±0.5 mN⋅m−1 (30), and γ2=9±0.5 mN⋅m−1, where the two latter values were respectively checked or measured from pendant and rising drops experiments. If we consider weak anchoring conditions within our simplified model, the dependence of q on h can be obtained numerically. Reduced values qw are obtained, especially at low thicknesses and low anchoring energies, but the magnitude remains the same. However, the comparison of these curves with the experimental data (taking also into account the birefringence measurements) shows that the associated anchoring energies of the liquid crystals at interfaces cannot be much lower than W≈5⋅10−5 J⋅m−2 (Fig. 3 and SI Text).

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

(A) Thickness of a nematic film vs. its distance r from an embedded bead. Experimental points are obtained by angular averaging of the thickness obtained from the retardation map (Inset). The solid curve is a fit using Eq. 3. (B) Evolution of q with the thickness. The fitting lines (main text) confirm that the disjoining pressure mainly results from nematic elasticity. Taking into account the finite anchoring energies reduces the values of q especially at low thicknesses. The green dashed-dotted line shows a fitting curve qw obtained using weak anchoring conditions for possible anchoring energies Wh=6⋅10−5 J⋅m−2 and Wp=4⋅10−5 J⋅m−2.

Fig. S2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. S2.

(Circles) Fitting parameter of the experimental profiles Afit with the far thickness h0. The solid lines are the theoretical values Ath computed for the estimated bounding values of the particles radius R=2±0.3 μm.

Elasto-Capillarity in Nematic Films.

Now that the profile of the film thickness is explained, let us consider the nematic field around the particle. As said above, giant dipoles have been seen only in deformed films. However, the largest dipoles are not necessarily observed in the most distorted films (which are the thinnest ones). The equilibrium distance de between the bead center and the defect has been measured in samples of different thickness. For a few samples, we have also followed the evolution of this distance while increasing (or decreasing) the thickness by adding (removing) a small amount of 5CB. For each measurement, we have waited tens of minutes to reach an equilibrium distance. Fig. 4A shows the evolution of de from 100 microspheres. Up to a thickness about 1.6 μm, the data are only slightly dispersed (presumably due to size dispersion of beads) and each mark corresponds to an average of about 10 individual measurements. In this region, we observe only giant dipoles with an increase of the distance with the thickness. Above 2.6 μm, on the contrary only the short common dipoles are observed with a typical distance de<4 μm. In the thickness range 1.6–2.6 μm, a coexistence of giant and short dipoles is observed in samples at equilibrium. When adding 5CB, the distance of a given giant dipole increases (purple triangle trajectory in Fig. 4A), reaches a maximum, and then rapidly decreases toward the close contact.

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

(A) Evolution of the distance particle center defect de with the film thickness h0. Below 1.6 μm, the experimental data are grouped and each mark (brown circles) corresponds to the average of about 10 independent measurements in a 0.1-μm thickness range. Above 2.6 μm, the defects are always located in the vicinity of the particle (individual measurements). In the 1.6- to 2.6- μm range, the data are highly scattered with defects either close to the particle or at a large distance from it (open squares). Individual dipoles (colored markers with arrows) have also been followed while continuously increasing or decreasing the film thickness (main text). (B) Evolution of de with h0 computed using the ansatz of Eq. 4 with Θ=π/2 and K=K/2. Solid black diamonds indicate local minima of the elastic free energy, whereas open red diamonds show the absolute minima. The letters A, B, and C indicate three typical situations detailed in Fig. 5.

The role of the gradient of thickness is of prime importance to explain the formation of the giant dipole. The most economical explanation, at first sight, would evoke the fact that a defect will tend to decrease its core energy by escaping in the thinnest part of the film. Such an explanation has been already proposed to explain why +1/2 defects that are naturally present at the surface of nematic shells (with both planar anchorings) migrate to their thinnest part (31). It should be noted, however, that +1/2 defects are tridimensional disclinations spanning the shells whereas the −1 defects considered here are boojums that do not live in the nematic layers but rather at their surface. Such defects are much less sensitive to the thickness as already noted in ref. 31, where they were also observed in the thick parts of the shells. Moreover, in a recent work (26), we have also reported that particles trapped on shells could give rise to short common dipoles and even be accompanied by −1/2 defects in the thickest part. Another explanation of the presence of the textures has to be found.

To understand why giant dipoles form in the distorted films, one has to consider a refined description of the elastic energy stored in the film. For this, we have explored an ansatz already used to analyze and explain distorted textures found in nonflat hybrid nematic films (20, 32). It consists of an approximation for the elastic energy density of a distorted hybrid NLC film, expressed in terms of 2D operators only (20),f2D=12K(∇xyφ)2+12K(Θ+c.∇xyhh)2,[4]where ∇xy is the 2D gradient and φ is the azimuthal angle of the c director in the xy plane [c=(cos⁡φ,sin⁡φ)]. Twist energy terms are fully neglected in this model. The first term accounts for the xy splay bend distortions of the c director with an elastic modulus that is only about half the 3D modulus (K≈K/2) due to the absence of distortions at the perpendicularly anchored interface. The second term is the already encountered zenithal distortion term with a geometric correction due to the thickness gradient. If the angles θp and θh (Fig. 1A) are defined with respect to the normal of the lower and upper interfaces, the term Θ=θp−θh indeed does not account for the whole angular reorientation of the n director when the interfaces are not parallel. When the gradient of thickness remains small, the geometric angular correction is given by c.∇xyh at first order and the director tends to be parallel with the thickness gradient. The part of the free energy that depends on the 2D c texture is then given by F2D=∬f2D′h(x,y)dxdy, where f2D′h(x,y)=f2D−KΘ2/2h2. Such an elastic energy will tend to favor the alignment of the c director on the gradient of the thickness. Because we use perpendicularly anchored microspheres that also give rise to a radial gradient for the thickness, a radial director field is highly favored in the vicinity of the bead. It is only at large distances, where the film gets a uniform thickness, that the gain in energy of the radial texture is not balanced anymore. Following the classic mechanisms, a defect of opposite charge appears to decrease the distortion energy at very large distance.

To confirm this scenario, we have numerically investigated the evolution of the nematic texture of minimal energy caused by a microsphere. We have found a nonmonotonic behavior of F2D with the distance d between the bead and the topological defect of charge −1. Fig. 4B shows the positions de of the local minima of the energy found as a function of the film thickness h0 with three typical dependencies detailed in Fig. 5. Several features of the experimental observations are found. First, at small thicknesses h0, F2D shows a single minimum (Fig. 4B, case A) with respect to d, corresponding to a giant dipole. In this region, the equilibrium distance de increases with the thickness. The free energy then shows two local minima (Fig. 4B, case B) corresponding to a giant and a classic dipole. In thicker samples, the free elastic energy shows only one minimum corresponding to the short dipole (Fig. 4B, case C). With the 2D ansatz, the main experimental trends are thus found with simulated textures (shown in Fig. 5) very similar to the experimental observations. However, one should note an overestimation of both the threshold thicknesses and the typical distances d in Fig. 4. This could be due to the roughness of the ansatz model, which ignores some components of the elastic energy (such as twist terms), but also to the strong anchoring approximation. Both the threshold thicknesses and d indeed are found to decrease with weaker anchoring conditions (Θ<π/2).

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

(A–C) Evolution of the dependence of the elastic free energy F2D on d with the film thickness (A) h0=1.2 μm, (B) h0=2.5 μm, and (C) h0=3 μm. Each curve is accompanied by the birefringence pattern simulated from the corresponding ground state texture. A magnification of the vicinity of the microsphere is shown in C.

Colloidal Interactions in a Thin Nematic Film.

As discussed above, the capillary distortion around an isolated colloid is strong enough to be almost independent of the nematic c director, which then adapts to the imposed thickness variation. One could wonder whether the capillary interactions expected between two particles may be compatible with the presence of giant dipoles. It is indeed well known that capillary interactions between particles trapped in a thin film are always attractive (28). We have therefore explored the pair interactions between two trapped colloids by increasing the amount of particles in the deposited films (but still with a density low enough to avoid undesirable aggregation during the brief heating of preparation). When the film thickness h0 is large enough, the common short dipoles are observed and two neighboring particles rapidly come together, forming a dipole pair parallel to the director field. This classic behavior is expected because both capillary and parallel dipolar–dipolar interactions are attractive. More interesting is the case of thin films where giants dipoles are observed. As illustrated in Fig. 6, two parallel dipoles interact attractively until an equilibrium distance is found. The distance ℛ between the two microspheres is comparable to twice the equilibrium distance de between a sphere and its defect. During the approach of the particles, de is hardly modified, which indicates that the attractive capillary interaction is not sufficient to overcome the effective interactions due to the nematic elasticity. If the sample is then heated into the isotropic phase, the particles are submitted to capillary attraction only and they come together in a few minutes, as illustrated in Fig. 6B.

Fig. 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6.

Interactions between two microspheres in a thin film. In nematic phase at room temperature, an appropriate thickness h0 gives rise to the formation of giant dipoles that spontaneously align at an equilibrium distance (A, crossed polarizers). The far-distances elastic forces are sufficient to avoid the collapse of the particles under capillarity, which is observed in a few minutes (B, bright field) when the sample is heated into the isotropic phase (T=40 °C).

The stability of the giant dipoles is due to the fact that the capillary force between immersed particles at a distance ℛ has a magnitude given by ℱc≈2πγ1R2qK1(qℛ) (28), where K1 is the modified Bessel function of the second kind of order 1. Above qℛ≥2, this force decays exponentially, ℱc∝exp(−qℛ). When two dipoles come into contact (at a typical distance of 2de), the radial texture around each particle becomes distorted, which gives rise to a similar repulsive force to the one observed between a particle and its defect, which was discussed in the previous section. The typical magnitude K (Fig. 5) of this repulsive force is larger than ℱc at large distances: For example, the experimental data q≈0.05 μm−1 for a typical thickness of 1 μm give ℱc/K≪1 for ℛ>160 μm.

In conclusion, capillary effects on nematic films strongly modify the known textures found for nematic colloids. Microparticles embedded in thin nematic films give rise to giant elastic dipoles that are not observed in thin nematic cells and that can be used to mediate long-range elastic forces between microparticles. Additionally, the geometry of the dipoles can be simply controlled via the film thickness. From a theoretical point of view, a full variational analysis is formally needed but we have shown that the deformation of the interfaces and the 2D nematic textures could be analyzed separately in a first approximation. In our approach, the nematic distortion through the film thickness is taken into account with a scalar disjoining pressure, and the nematic texture could then be analyzed in a second step with a fixed thickness profile. These results are to our knowledge the first evidence of the role of elastocapillary potentials in nematic films. Moreover, we showed that elastic dipoles and the nematic elasticity are sufficient to counterbalance the strongly attractive capillary interactions between colloidal particles when they are trapped in thin films. These findings may help to direct the arrangement of colloidal particles into rich 2D structures and develop new classes of reconfigurable metamaterials. We hope this work will stimulate experimental and theoretical works on the self-assembly mechanisms that could emerge from such a competition.

Materials and Methods

Film Preparation and Particle Dispersion.

The studied systems are obtained by spreading thin films of 5CB (4-n-pentyl-4′-cyanobiphenyl from Synthon Chemicals) at the surface of a 1-mm-thick water layer in a glass cuvette of diameter 20 mm that contains 5 wt% of PVA (Sigma-Aldrich; Mr 20,000) to ensure complete wetting of 5CB. After deposition of a droplet of 5CB on the surface of the aqueous solution, the sample is briefly heated to 40 °C, in the isotropic state of 5CB, and then cooled back to room temperature, to homogenize rapidly the film thickness. Similarly, particle dispersion is obtained by spreading films containing 0.1 wt% of silica particles (2 ± 0.2 μm of radius (Bangslabs) over the PVA solution. The particles were previously covered with a monolayer of N,N-dimethyl-N-octadecyl-3-aminopropyl trimethoxysilyl chloride (DMOAP) (Sigma-Aldrich), which ensures a very strong perpendicular anchoring for 5CB (33).

Optical Characterization.

The samples are placed in transparent sealed boxes (to avoid water evaporation and dust deposition) and observed under a microscope (LEICA DM 2500P equipped with a Sony 1,024 × 768 digital camera), using three different techniques. Newton’s colors and thin film interference patterns (15) could be observed in reflection mode, with direct or (546-nm)-filtered white light. Because NLC films are optically anisotropic, the nematic textures were also observed in polarized transmission microscopy. Finally, quantitative birefringence imaging (34) was performed at 546 nm with an Abrio (CRI Inc.) system adapted to the microscope. The optical retardation δ and the orientation of the effective optical axis in the plane of the films were determined at each pixel of 1,024 × 1,392-pixel regions, with a typical resolution of 1 nm for the retardation and 1° for the azimuthal orientation φ of the slow axis. To interpret quantitatively these 2D retardation and slow-axis maps, one, however, has to consider the 3D distortion of the n- director field, as explained in the main text. In particular, the thickness is measured from the optical retardation, as detailed in SI Text.

Numerical Modeling.

To determine numerically the 2D nematic texture caused by a single microsphere, we have used the free energy density f2D defined in Eq. 4. The part of the free energy that depends on the scalar field φ(x,y) is F2D=∬f2D′h(x,y)dxdy, where f2D′h(x,y)=f2D−KΘ2/2h2. For a given film thickness h0, we first compute the axisymmetric interface profile centered on the bead and given by the analytical theory: h(r)=h0+AthK0(qthr), where qth(h0)=βthh0−3/2 and Ath(h0) is numerically computed for R=2 μm (full details in SI Text). We have considered strong anchoring conditions on the interfaces (that is, Θ=π/2) and a 2D splay-bend constant given by K=K/2.

Equilibrium states are found by minimizing F2D with finite-element methods, using the partial differential equation solver FreeFem++ (35). We have considered only dipolar textures with a mirror symmetry along the x axis, where the finite-element domain Ω is a half disk of radius L much larger than the radius R of the microsphere (L=250R). Its geometry and the corresponding boundary conditions used for the finite-element methods are shown in Fig. S3. At a given thickness h0, an elastic dipole is then defined only by the distance d between the defect and the center of the bead. The free energy F2D(h0,d) is then minimized with respect to the possible 2D textures, using the nonlinear conjugate gradient algorithm of the FreeFem++ package, which is iterated until the relative variation of the norm of the gradient of the functional F2D with respect to all degrees of freedom is less than 10−5. An adaptive grid is used to improve the numerical accuracy. The local minima of F2D(h0) are then established by varying d.

Fig. S3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. S3.

Finite-element domain Ω and corresponding boundary conditions for φ. The half-disk is centered on the midpoint of the defect and the bead. The homeotropic boundary conditions around the particle are shown in the magnified region. A cutoff half-disk of radius ξ=R/200 is also present around the −1 defect (not shown here).

SI Text

Measurement of The Local Thickness h of a Nematic Film.

In principle, the quantity h(x,y) can be obtained from the local retardation δ(x,y) measured by the Abrio system; i.e., h=δ/Δn¯, where Δn¯ is the effective birefringence of the hybrid film, considered as homogeneous through its thickness. The value of Δn¯ can be theoretically computed from the zenithal orientation θ(z) of the director n (Fig. 1 of main text). If ne and no are respectively the extraordinary and the ordinary refractive indexes of the bulk nematic, the ordinary refractive index of the film is no, whereas the effective extraordinary refractive index ne¯ deviates from ne due to the distortion of the director. For a normal incident light, it is given byne¯=1h∫0hnenone2⁡cos2⁡θ(z)+no2⁡sin2⁡θ(z)dz.[S1]

Using the simplest expression of the nematic bulk Frank elastic energy (36) (without twist and surface terms),fd=12K1⁡sin2⁡θ(dθdz)2+12K3⁡cos2⁡θ(dθdz)2,[S2]the orientation of the director, θ(z), can be computed from the minimization of the elastic free energy. With the simplified hypotheses of strong anchoring, i.e., θp=θ(0)=π/2 and θh=θ(h)=0, and the one-constant approximation K1=K3=K, one obtainsfd=12K(dθdz)2[S3]θ(z)=π2(1−zh).[S4]

The effective birefringence Δn¯ computed from the values ne=1.735 and no=1.537 (37) available for 5CB at 23 °C and λ=546 nm and in the hypothesis of strong anchorings is then Δn¯=ne¯−no≈0.0945, nearly half the 5CB birefringence (Δn=0.198). This value is also close to the effective birefringence Δn¯≈0.0933 numerically computed from the strong anchoring hypothesis only [taking K1≈6 pN and K3≈9 pN (29)].

Both these theoretical values are, however, overestimated (by ≈15%) as shown by the comparisons of the birefringence maps with the interference patterns observed in reflection of a polarized light at the same wavelength (546 nm). To illustrate the experimental method we have followed, a floating lens of nematic 5CB is shown in reflection in Fig. S1A. The corresponding retardation and easy-axis maps of the same droplet, obtained with the Abrio system, are shown in Fig. S1 A and B. The destructive interference fringes between the light reflected from the upper and lower surfaces of the film are characterized by a difference in optical path n¯.h=jλ/2 (j∈ℕ). The refractive index checks n¯=no≈1.537 when the c director is perpendicular to the polarizer, because n is then perpendicular to the polarization of light throughout the nematic layer. Fig. S1C shows that the dependence of the optical retardation δ on the optical retardation h.no is almost linear. From the study of 20 different configurations, we have obtained δ=Δn¯h with Δn¯=0.08±0.004 in the range of interest (0.5–3 μm). These results are compatible with the value of ne¯ obtained from the same calibration method when c is parallel to the polarizer. They also indicate that the strong anchoring hypothesis is not perfectly fulfilled for the considered thicknesses and give additional information on the anchoring energies of the liquid crystal at the interfaces.

Considering the more realistic case of finite anchorings (22), the angle θ might indeed depart from the values θh=0 and θp=π/2 at the interfaces with some energy cost. The simplest model that accounts for anchoring energies uses Rapini–Papoular expressions, yielding a free energy per unit area,Fd=∫0h12K(dθdz)2dz+12Wh⁡sin2(θh)+12Wp⁡cos2(θp),[S5]where Wh and Wp are the respective anchoring energies of the upper and lower interfaces shown in Fig. 1. After minimization of the free energy, the dependence of θ on z remains linear,θ(z)=θp−Θzh,[S6]but the coefficients θp and Θ=θp−θh have to be determined numerically using the set of equations2K(θp−θh)h=Wh⁡sin⁡2θh[S7]2K(θp−θh)h=Wp⁡sin⁡2θp.[S8]It is not possible to obtain an accurate value of the anchoring energies from the fit of birefringence data alone. However, in combination with the constraints related to deformation of the interface around beads (main text, Fig. S1C, and Fig. 3), the fits of birefringence measurement yield a lower boundary value Wmin≈5⋅10−5 J⋅m−2 for the anchoring energies. This value is higher than the commonly accepted value W≈10−5 J⋅m−2 of anchoring energy at the 5CB free surface (22). This difference could be due to the high content of water in the air, because all our experiments have been done in saturated water conditions.

Analytical Treatment of the Film Deformation Around a Microsphere.

Capillary model.

To evaluate analytically the distortion of the film around a trapped spherical particle, we have adopted a simple theoretical model, derived from ref. 28. Experimental observations show that the variation in thickness around the bead is radial, whereas the nematic texture is not (Fig. 2A). The capillary effects therefore largely dominate the elastic distortion of the c director and 2D elasticity does not intervene directly in our model. However, the influence of the nematic elasticity on the interfaces cannot be entirely discarded. The antagonistic anchoring conditions at the upper and lower interfaces lead to a thickness-dependent interfacial free energy. In the case of the one-constant approximation and strong boundary conditions, Eqs. S3 and S4 yield a surface free energy for a thickness h:Fd=∫fddz=Kπ28h.[S9]In the first approximation, the nematic elasticity therefore acts as a disjoining pressure ΠD(h)=−∂Fd/∂h=Kπ2/8h2 for the thin film, providing that the slopes of both interfaces remain small. In the case of a weak anchoring, the disjoining pressure obtained from Eqs. S5–S8 has a similar form ΠD(h)=−∂Fd/∂h=KΘ(h)2/2h2, where the angular deviation Θ is now a function of the thickness. Using the notations of Fig. 2B, the mechanical equilibrium of the film is given by the Young–Laplace equations of the two interfaces,Pa−Pf(h)=2γ1H1Pf(h)−Pw=2γ2H2,[S10]where γ1 and H1 are respectively the interfacial tension and mean curvature of the air–5CB interface (γ2 and H2, respectively, for the 5CB–water/PVA interfaces) and Pa,Pf(h) and Pw are the respective pressures of the air, film, and water/PVA solution. Neglecting the gravitational effects on the pressure fields, we have Pa=Pf(h0)=Pw at the far distance thickness h0. We follow the approach of Kralchevsky and Nagayama (28) to compute analytically the axisymmetric solution. Using an expansion of the disjoining pressure around h0, the pressure of the film is Pf(h)=Pf(h0)+ΠD′(h−h0), where ΠD′=∂ΠD/∂h|h0. The linearized Young–Laplace equations then becomeΔz1=q12(z1−z2−h0)Δz2=−q22(z1−z2−h0),[S11]where z1(r) and z2(r) are respectively the heights of the air–5CB and 5CB–PVA/water interfaces at the distance r of the bead center and qi=−ΠD′/γi, (i=1,2). The thickness of the film h=z1−z2 and the mean height of the film z¯ checkΔh=q2(h−h0)Δz¯=wΔh/2,[S12]where q=q12+q22 and w=(q12−q22)/(q12+q22). The set of equations is satisfied byh(r)=h0+AK0(qr)z¯(r)=[T+wAK0(qr)]/2,[S13]where K0 is the modified Bessel function of the second kind of zero order, A and T being two constants of integration. The interface heights z1 and z2 are thereforez1(r)=T+h0+AK0(qr)(w+1)2z2(r)=T−h0+AK0(qr)(w−1)2.[S14]The unknown parameters A and T are determined by the Young–Dupré relations, which fix the contact angles ϑi (Fig. 2B) at each triple line located at ri (i=1,2), where we have also the set of relationstan⁡ψi=dzidr|ri, sin⁡χi=zi(ri)R, cos⁡χi=riR.[S15]The combination of Eqs. S14 and S15, together with the geometric relations ψ1=ϑ1+χ1−π/2 and ψ2=π/2−ϑ2+χ2, yieldsA=2qtan(ϑ1+χ1)K0(qRcos⁡χ1)(w+1)=2qtan(ϑ2−χ2)K0(qRcos⁡χ2)(w−1)[S16]andT=[q⁡tan(ϑ1+χ1)K1(qR⁡cos⁡χ1)(2R⁡sin⁡χ1−h0)−2K0(qR⁡cos χ1)]1q⁡tan(ϑ1+χ1)K1(qR⁡cos χ1)=[q⁡tan(ϑ2−χ1)K1(qR⁡cos⁡χ2)(2Rsin⁡χ2+h0)+2K0(qR⁡cos⁡χ2)]1q⁡tan(ϑ2−χ2)K1(qR⁡cos χ2),[S17]where K1 is the modified Bessel function of the second kind of order 1. The last two sets of equations can then be formally used to compute the values χi(R,ϑ1,ϑ2,q,h0) and thus to obtain the interfaces profile.

Adequacy to experimental data.

As discussed in the main text, the thickness profiles h(r) given by Eq. S13 satisfactorily fit the experimental profiles and predict a correct dependence qfit≈qth=βelh0−3/2. The fitting procedures provide another parameter Afit. We have checked that Afit is also correctly predicted by the simple capillary model. The values of the contact angles ϑ1 and ϑ2 are required to compute Ath. These contact angles were macroscopically measured at the triple line of a nematic droplet deposited on a silanized glass either in the air (ϑ1=40°±3°) or immersed in a water/PVA solution (ϑ2=30°±2°). Numerical resolution of Eqs. S16 and S17 then yields a dependence Ath(h0) shown in Fig. S2. The fitting parameters Afit that were found are therefore also satisfactorily explained by the capillary model. The points are, however, more dispersed than qfit, which does not depend on the actual size of the beads.

Acknowledgments

H.J. was partially supported by two grants for a research stay in Montpellier from the Tunisian Ministry for Higher Education, Research, and Technology.

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: christophe.blanc02{at}univ-montp2.fr.
  • Author contributions: M.A.G., T.O., and C.B. designed research; H.J. and C.B. performed research; H.J. and C.B. analyzed data; and H.J., M.A.G., and C.B. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. I.I.S. is a guest editor invited by the Editorial Board.

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1508865112/-/DCSupplemental.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Muševič I,
    2. Škarabot M,
    3. Tkalec U,
    4. Ravnik M,
    5. Žumer S
    (2006) Two-dimensional nematic colloidal crystals self-assembled by topological defects. Science 313(5789):954–958
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Muševič I,
    2. Škarabot M
    (2008) Self-assembly of nematic colloids. Soft Matter 4(2):195–199
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. ↵
    1. Silvestre NM,
    2. Liu Q,
    3. Senyuk B,
    4. Smalyukh II,
    5. Tasinkevych M
    (2014) Towards template-assisted assembly of nematic colloids. Phys Rev Lett 112(22):225501
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Poulin P,
    2. Stark H,
    3. Lubensky TC,
    4. Weitz DA
    (1997) Novel colloidal interactions in anisotropic fluids. Science 275(5307):1770–1773
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Lubensky T,
    2. Pettey D,
    3. Currier N,
    4. Stark H
    (1998) Topological defects and interactions in nematic emulsions. Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics 57(1):610–625
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. ↵
    1. Ognysta U, et al.
    (2008) 2D interactions and binary crystals of dipolar and quadrupolar nematic colloids. Phys Rev Lett 100(21):217803
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Ravnik M,
    2. Žumer S
    (2009) Landau–de Gennes modelling of nematic liquid crystal colloids. Liq Cryst 36(10–11):1201–1214
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. ↵
    1. Lapointe CP,
    2. Mason TG,
    3. Smalyukh II
    (2009) Shape-controlled colloidal interactions in nematic liquid crystals. Science 326(5956):1083–1086
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Beller DA,
    2. Gharbi MA,
    3. Liu IB
    (2015) Shape-controlled orientation and assembly of colloids with sharp edges in nematic liquid crystals. Soft Matter 11(6):1078–1086
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Liu IB, et al.
    (2015) Elastocapillary interactions on nematic films. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(20):6336–6340
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Delabre U,
    2. Richard C,
    3. Cazabat AM
    (2009) Some specificities of wetting by cyanobiphenyl liquid crystals. J Phys Condens Matter 21(46):464129
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Lavrentovich O,
    2. Nastishin YA
    (1990) Defects in degenerate hybrid aligned nematic liquid crystals. Europhys Lett 12(2):135–141
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. ↵
    1. Sparavigna A,
    2. Lavrentovich OD,
    3. Strigazzi A
    (1994) Periodic stripe domains and hybrid-alignment regime in nematic liquid crystals: Threshold analysis. Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics 49(2):1344–1352
    .
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Nazarenko VG,
    2. Nych AB,
    3. Lev BI
    (2001) Crystal structure in nematic emulsion. Phys Rev Lett 87(7):075504
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Cazabat AM,
    2. Delabre U,
    3. Richard C,
    4. Sang YYC
    (2011) Experimental study of hybrid nematic wetting films. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 168(1–2):29–39
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Delabre U,
    2. Richard C,
    3. Sang YYC,
    4. Cazabat AM
    (2010) Thin liquid crystal films on liquids in the nematic range of temperatures. Langmuir 26(16):13368–13376
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Nakata M,
    2. Link DR,
    3. Takanishi Y,
    4. Ishikawa K,
    5. Takezoe H
    (2001) Holes and disclinations in hybrid nematic liquid crystal films. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 64(2 Pt 1):021709
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Drzaic PS
    (1995) Liquid Crystal Dispersions (World Scientific, Singapore), Vol 1
    .
  19. ↵
    1. Proust J,
    2. Perez E,
    3. Ter-Minassian-Saraga L
    (1978) Films minces de cristal liquide nématique sur support liquide structure, tensions superficielles et tension de ligne [Thin films of nematic liquid crystal on liquid substrate. Bulk and surface structures, surface and line tensions]. Colloid Polym Sci 256(7):666–681, French
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. ↵
    1. Link DR,
    2. Nakata M,
    3. Takanishi Y,
    4. Ishikawa K,
    5. Takezoe H
    (2001) Patterns in hybrid nematic liquid-crystal films: Topography and topology. Phys Rev Lett 87(19):195507
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Manyuhina OV,
    2. Amar MB
    (2013) Thin nematic films: Anchoring effects and stripe instability revisited. Phys Lett A 377(13):1003–1011
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. ↵
    1. Lavrentovich OD,
    2. Pergamenshchik VM
    (1994) Stripe domain phase of a thin nematic film and the K13 divergence term. Phys Rev Lett 73(7):979–982
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Delabre U,
    2. Richard C,
    3. Guéna G,
    4. Meunier J,
    5. Cazabat AM
    (2008) Nematic pancakes revisited. Langmuir 24(8):3998–4006
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Gharbi MA, et al.
    (2011) Behavior of colloidal particles at a nematic liquid crystal interface. Soft Matter 7(4):1467–1471
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. ↵
    1. Gharbi MA,
    2. Nobili M,
    3. Blanc C
    (2014) Use of topological defects as templates to direct assembly of colloidal particles at nematic interfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci 417:250–255
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. ↵
    1. Gharbi MA, et al.
    (2013) Microparticles confined to a nematic liquid crystal shell. Soft Matter 9(29):6911–6920
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  27. ↵
    1. Delabre U,
    2. Richard C,
    3. Cazabat AM
    (2009) Thin nematic films on liquid substrates. J Phys Chem B 113(12):3647–3652
    .
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Kralchevsky PA,
    2. Nagayama K
    (2000) Capillary interactions between particles bound to interfaces, liquid films and biomembranes. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 85(2–3):145–192
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Madhusudana N,
    2. Pratibha R
    (1982) Elasticity and orientational order in some cyanobiphenyls: Part iv. Reanalysis of the data. Mol Cryst Liq Cryst 89:249–257
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. ↵
    1. Tintaru M,
    2. Moldovan R,
    3. Beica T,
    4. Frunza S
    (2001) Surface tension of some liquid crystals in the cyanobiphenyl series. Liq Cryst 28(5):793–797
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. ↵
    1. Fernández-Nieves A, et al.
    (2007) Novel defect structures in nematic liquid crystal shells. Phys Rev Lett 99(15):157801
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Lavrentovich OD
    (1992) Geometrical anchoring at an inclined surface of a liquid crystal. Phys Rev A 46(2):R722–R725
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Škarabot M, et al.
    (2008) Interactions of quadrupolar nematic colloids. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 77(3 Pt 1):031705
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Shribak M,
    2. Oldenbourg R
    (2003) Techniques for fast and sensitive measurements of two-dimensional birefringence distributions. Appl Opt 42(16):3009–3017
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Hecht F
    (2012) New development in freefem++. J Numer Math 20(3–4):251–266
    .
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    1. De Gennes PG,
    2. Prost J
    (1993) The Physics of Liquid Crystals (Clarendon, Oxford), Vol 23
    .
  37. ↵
    1. Li J,
    2. Gauza S,
    3. Wu ST
    (2004) Temperature effect on liquid crystal refractive indices. J Appl Phys 96(1):19–24
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Capillary-induced giant elastic dipoles in thin nematic films
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Giant elastic dipoles in a nematic
Haifa Jeridi, Mohamed A. Gharbi, Tahar Othman, Christophe Blanc
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Dec 2015, 112 (48) 14771-14776; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1508865112

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Giant elastic dipoles in a nematic
Haifa Jeridi, Mohamed A. Gharbi, Tahar Othman, Christophe Blanc
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Dec 2015, 112 (48) 14771-14776; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1508865112
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Article Classifications

  • Physical Sciences
  • Applied Physical Sciences
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 112 (48)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results and Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • SI Text
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Water from a faucet fills a glass.
News Feature: How “forever chemicals” might impair the immune system
Researchers are exploring whether these ubiquitous fluorinated molecules might worsen infections or hamper vaccine effectiveness.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Dmitry Naumov.
Reflection of clouds in the still waters of Mono Lake in California.
Inner Workings: Making headway with the mysteries of life’s origins
Recent experiments and simulations are starting to answer some fundamental questions about how life came to be.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Radoslaw Lecyk.
Cave in coastal Kenya with tree growing in the middle.
Journal Club: Small, sharp blades mark shift from Middle to Later Stone Age in coastal Kenya
Archaeologists have long tried to define the transition between the two time periods.
Image credit: Ceri Shipton.
Illustration of groups of people chatting
Exploring the length of human conversations
Adam Mastroianni and Daniel Gilbert explore why conversations almost never end when people want them to.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Panda bear hanging in a tree
How horse manure helps giant pandas tolerate cold
A study finds that giant pandas roll in horse manure to increase their cold tolerance.
Image credit: Fuwen Wei.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Cozzarelli Prize
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490