Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
Inner Workings

Inner Workings: DNA for data storage and computing

Megan Scudellari

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS December 29, 2015 112 (52) 15771-15772; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1520100112
Megan Scudellari
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

On the surface, genetic and electrical engineering appear to have little in common. One field revolves around carbon and the other is built upon silicon; one makes RNA from DNA and the other converts AC to DC.

Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Some biologists have begun to apply the concepts of electrical engineering to living cells, literally programming them for data storage and computation. Image courtesy of Timothy Lu and Yan Liang.

But some creative biologists have begun to apply the concepts of electrical engineering to living cells. “We view ourselves as biological programmers,” says Timothy Lu, a member of the Synthetic Biology Group at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Lu and others are engineering circuits into bacterial cells, literally programming them for functions, such as data storage and computation. DNA’s straightforward, self-replicating helices are easy to amplify, modify, and are generally quite stable, says Lu. And since each position of DNA can encode four different pieces of information—A, T, G, or C—instead of just two, as with classic binary silicon systems, DNA could someday, in principle, store more data in less space. “The same properties that make DNA a great genetic code for living organisms also makes it an interesting substrate to engineer,” says Lu.

The quest to engineer DNA began with chemist Marvin Caruthers, who first strung together short sequences of DNA back in the early 1980s. Each new strand—six to eight sets of 20 nucleotides each—took him one to two days to build. Today, biomedical researchers and others can synthesize one of Caruthers’ strands in seconds.

In 2000, researchers at Boston University and Princeton University took these biological engineering feats in a new direction. They built the first synthetic biological circuits within Escherichia coli—namely a ring oscillator and a toggle switch (1, 2)—demonstrating that it was possible to control genes through artificial biological circuitry.

Back then, Lu, the son of an electrical engineer, was an MIT undergraduate studying electronic circuit design. But a project to build a cochlear implant sparked Lu’s interest in the interface of electronics and health, and he went on to complete a joint doctorate and medical degree in medical engineering from MIT and Harvard.

Lu’s first foray in synthetic biology didn’t entail DNA data storage. He engineered bacteriophage—viruses that infect bacteria—to more effectively target and kill bacteria to break apart biofilms (3), and later started a laboratory focused on designing microbes for human health applications.

But the 34-year-old researcher never really abandoned his roots in electrical engineering and has become one of a handful of researchers attempting to use DNA for computation. Over the course of five years, Lu has developed tools and techniques to program bacterial cells to perform binary (4) and analog computation (5). Using enzymes called recombinases, which recognize specific sequences of DNA, Lu programmed cells to remove a piece of DNA and flip it or cut it out in response to some stimuli, creating a “bit” of data, like a 1 or 0, the basis of binary computation. For analog computation, which processes continuous, varying measurements rather than the discrete 1s and 0s of binary, Lu combined the actions of three transcription factors to construct two cellular circuits that together detect and compute various amounts of compounds outside a cell.

“While our level of engineered [biological] systems are nowhere near where they [are] in other systems, like electrical or mechanical, we’re eager to learn and keep developing these platforms,” says Boston University biomedical engineer Ahmad “Mo” Khalil, who worked alongside Lu as a postdoctorate. “Engineering biological systems is a new way of studying biology and programming useful applications.”

Last year, Lu and graduate student Fahim Farzadfard devised a way to write memory, continuously and over time, into the DNA of a population of bacteria (6). The two identified and adapted an E. coli system, described 30 years ago in the literature, capable of expressing single-stranded DNA. The researchers engineered cells to express such DNA in response to a chemical or light stimulus. The DNA, targeted to a specific location on the genome, totes along an enzyme to modify the genome when it gets there, like recording information onto a tape recorder. In this way, an external stimulus can be recorded permanently into the genome and “read” back later.

Such bacteria could be programmed as environmental sensors, for example, to record levels of toxins in landfills or waterways, and later be collected and analyzed by researchers at their convenience. The same could be done in the mammalian gut, where the microbes could detect and record instances of infection, for example, or bleeding, then be collected and processed after passing through the system. With that goal in mind, Lu’s laboratory has already tested engineered bacteria in mice (7). The bacteria successfully sensed and recorded differences in gut composition based on food supplements fed to the rodents.

Other advances in the field include E. coli genetic toggle switches to detect and report “The same properties that make DNA a great genetic code for living organisms also makes it an interesting substrate to engineer.” —Timothy Luon cellular DNA damage or antibiotic activity (8, 9), a multicellular system that forms a visible pattern in the presence of a chemical (10), and synthetic gene networks that count (4).

Lu, meanwhile, keeps eyeing innovations. At his bustling, 30-person MIT laboratory, in among the students, postdoctorates, and crowded benchtops, there are sheets of cells lined with gold nanowires that can be remodeled into various patterns over time (11). The sheets are constructed by programming E. coli to produce fibers that grab onto gold nanoparticles in the presence of certain chemicals and arrange those particles into nanowires, creating a living material that conducts electricity.

If DNA synthesis costs continue to drop, Lu imagines a world in which DNA could even replace silicon hard drives for long-term storage. “You might encode the entire Library of Congress on DNA, or archive Hollywood movies,” says Lu. “We’ve built a bunch of circuits, and it’s just the first wave of applications.”

References

  1. ↵
    1. Elowitz MB,
    2. Leibler S
    (2000) A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators. Nature 403(6767):335–338
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Gardner TS,
    2. Cantor CR,
    3. Collins JJ
    (2000) Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli. Nature 403(6767):339–342
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Lu TK,
    2. Collins JJ
    (2007) Dispersing biofilms with engineered enzymatic bacteriophage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(27):11197–11202
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Friedland AE, et al.
    (2009) Synthetic gene networks that count. Science 324(5931):1199–1202
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Daniel R,
    2. Rubens JR,
    3. Sarpeshkar R,
    4. Lu TK
    (2013) Synthetic analog computation in living cells. Nature 497(7451):619–623
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Farzadfard F,
    2. Lu TK
    (2014) Genomically encoded analog memory with precise in vivo DNA writing in living cell populations. Science 346(6211):1256272
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Mimee M, et al.
    (2015) Programming a human commensal bacterium, Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, to sense and respond to stimuli in the murine gut microbiota. Cell Syst 1(1):62–71
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. ↵
    1. Kobayashi H, et al.
    (2004) Programmable cells: Interfacing natural and engineered gene networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(22):8414–8419
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Kotula JW, et al.
    (2014) Programmable bacteria detect and record an environmental signal in the mammalian gut. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(13):4838–4843
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Basu S,
    2. Gerchman Y,
    3. Collins CH,
    4. Arnold FH,
    5. Weiss R
    (2005) A synthetic multicellular system for programmed pattern formation. Nature 434(7037):1130–1134
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Chen AY,
    2. Zhong C,
    3. Lu TK
    (2015) Engineering living functional materials. ACS Synth Biol 4(1):8–11
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Inner Workings: DNA for data storage and computing
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
DNA for data storage and computing
Megan Scudellari
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Dec 2015, 112 (52) 15771-15772; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1520100112

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
DNA for data storage and computing
Megan Scudellari
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Dec 2015, 112 (52) 15771-15772; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1520100112
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 112 (52)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Smoke emanates from Japan’s Fukushima nuclear power plant a few days after tsunami damage
Core Concept: Muography offers a new way to see inside a multitude of objects
Muons penetrate much further than X-rays, they do essentially zero damage, and they are provided for free by the cosmos.
Image credit: Science Source/Digital Globe.
Water from a faucet fills a glass.
News Feature: How “forever chemicals” might impair the immune system
Researchers are exploring whether these ubiquitous fluorinated molecules might worsen infections or hamper vaccine effectiveness.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Dmitry Naumov.
Venus flytrap captures a fly.
Journal Club: Venus flytrap mechanism could shed light on how plants sense touch
One protein seems to play a key role in touch sensitivity for flytraps and other meat-eating plants.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Kuttelvaserova Stuchelova.
Illustration of groups of people chatting
Exploring the length of human conversations
Adam Mastroianni and Daniel Gilbert explore why conversations almost never end when people want them to.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Panda bear hanging in a tree
How horse manure helps giant pandas tolerate cold
A study finds that giant pandas roll in horse manure to increase their cold tolerance.
Image credit: Fuwen Wei.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Cozzarelli Prize
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490