Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology
Reply

Reply to Westaway et al.: Mandibular misrepresentations fail to support the invalid species Homo floresiensis

Robert B. Eckhardt, Maciej Henneberg, Sakdapong Chavanaves, Alexander S. Weller, and Kenneth J. Hsü
PNAS February 17, 2015 112 (7) E606; first published February 6, 2015; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1422176112
Robert B. Eckhardt
aLaboratory for the Study of Morphology, Mechanics and Molecules, Department of Kinesiology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: eyl@psu.edu
Maciej Henneberg
bSchool of Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sakdapong Chavanaves
aLaboratory for the Study of Morphology, Mechanics and Molecules, Department of Kinesiology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alexander S. Weller
cVirginia Tech Carillion School of Medicine, Roanoake, VA 24014; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kenneth J. Hsü
dKenneth J. Hsü Center for Integrated Hydrological Circuits Development, National Institutes of Earth Sciences, Beijing 100871, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

This article has a Letter. Please see:

  • Mandibular evidence supports Homo floresiensis as a distinct species - February 06, 2015

See related content:

  • LB1 discovery as a rare event in earth history
    - Aug 04, 2014
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Flawed arguments (1) ignoring our foundational paper (2) and disparaging “another pathology-based alternative” fail to support an invalidly invented hominin species.

Homo floresiensis (Hf) fails scientifically, apart from the biomedical diagnosis of its abnormality (2). Endocranial volume of 380 mL, never duplicated, was >13% too low by identical techniques used to measure 430 mL, ignored until matched by skeptics within 1% (3). Stature of 1.06 m, underestimated by >17% to >27% (2), corrects to within the range of living Rampasasa, affirmed independently (4). Abnormal LB1 craniofacial asymmetry, originally unreported, lacks taphonomic distortion as confirmed even by our critics (3). Given hundreds of disorders producing small brain and short stature and asymmetry (2), Hf is an invalid taxon independent of any particular diagnosis.

LB1 mandibular morphology including absence of an external chin does not obviate diagnosis of Down syndrome (DS), because “that disorder is characterized by extensive phenotypic variability, with most traits occurring in only a fraction of affected individuals” (5). Claiming “absence of chins in the two mandibles recovered at Liang Bua, LB1 and LB6, is a key issue” (1) for taxonomic affinities is false.

Observing the common absence of an external chin in DS, we explicitly stated that we did not believe that this explained LB1’s reduced chin; instead, we noted that a neutral or negative chin structure is a normal feature for many individuals (including LB6) in Australomelanesian populations. Our critics (1) misrepresent this point.

A reference dismissed as “just a conference abstract” (1) was summarized in detail (2). Of 52 Rampasasa individuals, 76.9% of the sample had neutral or negative hard tissue chins (see Rampasasa mandibles, www.liangbuacave.org, accessed December 18, 2014).

Also misleading is reference 4 in ref. 1; however, figure 9 from reference 30 in ref. 2 shows two Palauan mandibles (B:OR-14:8-122 and B:OR-14:8-771) that plainly lack external chins. Harsh criticism does not obviate observable data. As Senator Daniel Patrick Moyihan stated, “You are entitled to your own opinion but you are not entitled to your own facts.”

CT scans of LB1 juxtaposed with Roonka 45 misconstrue our point (2) that nonprojecting bony chins can be widely found in recent Australomelanesians; Roonka 45 is far less different on this point from LB6 (figure 3 from reference 3 in ref. 1), which our critics chose not to show. Their illustration (figure 1 in ref. 1) misrepresents as simple morphology what is functionally and developmentally complex (figure 8 from reference 3 in ref. 1).

“LB1 and LB6 also exhibit a strong extramolar sulcus, a trait found in early hominins but not in Homo sapiens.” This is simply wrong. Song Keplek 5, a Holocene human skeleton from Java, shows bilateral extramolar sulci (figure 3.8 in ref. 6).

A different fallacy is inherent in the statement “LB1’s and LB6’s tooth root morphology differs from that seen in Homo sapiens.” Wrong again: hominoid primate tooth root numbers are not distributed monomorphically per taxon but rather as transpopulation polymorphisms (7), differing only in relative frequencies.

Matching facts that simply are wrong is the incorrect assertion (1) that mandibular and dental traits refute the inference that LB1 exhibits DS. We clearly stated that both the LB1 and LB6 mandibles exhibit phenotypes “observable in Australomelanesian populations (Flores, Palau, and elsewhere)….”

For all of these reasons, the inexpert statements made about the Liang Bua mandibles (1) represent yet another attempted diversion from the inability of archaeologists to establish a valid primitive hominin species on the basis of unfossilized bones found at one site, despite a decade of searches.

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: eyl{at}psu.edu.
  • Author contributions: R.B.E., M.H., S.C., A.S.W., and K.J.H. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Westaway MC,
    2. Durband AC,
    3. Groves CP,
    4. Collard M
    (2015) Mandibular evidence support Homo floresiensis as a distinct species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:E604–E605
    .
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Eckhardt RB,
    2. Henneberg M,
    3. Weller AS,
    4. Hsü KJ
    (2014) Rare events in earth history include the LB1 human skeleton from Flores, Indonesia, as a developmental singularity, not a unique taxon. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(33):11961–11966
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Kubo D,
    2. Kono RT,
    3. Kaifu Y
    (2013) Brain size of Homo floreiensis and its evolutionary implications. Proc Biol Sci 280(1760):20130338
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. De Klerk B
    (2012) Size variation and body proportions in an isolated Holocene-aged population of hominids from Palau, Micronesia and its impact on our understanding of variation in extinct hominids. PhD dissertation (University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg)
    .
  5. ↵
    1. Prandini P, et al.
    (2007) Natural gene-expression variation in Down syndrome modulates the outcome of gene-dosage imbalance. Am J Hum Genet 81(2):252–263
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Noerwidi S
    (2012) The significance of the Holocene human skeleton Song Keplek 5 in the history of human colonization of Java: a comprehensive morphological and morphometric study. MA thesis (Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris)
    .
  7. ↵
    1. Eckhardt RB
    (2003) Polymorphisms past and present. Hum Biol 75(4):559–575
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reply to Westaway et al.: Mandibular misrepresentations fail to support the invalid species Homo floresiensis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
False facts fail invalid taxon
Robert B. Eckhardt, Maciej Henneberg, Sakdapong Chavanaves, Alexander S. Weller, Kenneth J. Hsü
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Feb 2015, 112 (7) E606; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1422176112

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
False facts fail invalid taxon
Robert B. Eckhardt, Maciej Henneberg, Sakdapong Chavanaves, Alexander S. Weller, Kenneth J. Hsü
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Feb 2015, 112 (7) E606; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1422176112
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 112 (7)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Article Classifications

  • Physical Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Biological Sciences
  • Evolution

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Surgeons hands during surgery
Inner Workings: Advances in infectious disease treatment promise to expand the pool of donor organs
Despite myriad challenges, clinicians see room for progress.
Image credit: Shutterstock/David Tadevosian.
Setting sun over a sun-baked dirt landscape
Core Concept: Popular integrated assessment climate policy models have key caveats
Better explicating the strengths and shortcomings of these models will help refine projections and improve transparency in the years ahead.
Image credit: Witsawat.S.
Double helix
Journal Club: Noncoding DNA shown to underlie function, cause limb malformations
Using CRISPR, researchers showed that a region some used to label “junk DNA” has a major role in a rare genetic disorder.
Image credit: Nathan Devery.
Steamboat Geyser eruption.
Eruption of Steamboat Geyser
Mara Reed and Michael Manga explore why Yellowstone's Steamboat Geyser resumed erupting in 2018.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Multi-color molecular model
Enzymatic breakdown of PET plastic
A study demonstrates how two enzymes—MHETase and PETase—work synergistically to depolymerize the plastic pollutant PET.
Image credit: Aaron McGeehan (artist).

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490