Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology

Yes, there is a female and a male brain: Morphology versus functionality

Marek Glezerman
PNAS April 5, 2016 113 (14) E1971; first published March 8, 2016 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1524418113
Marek Glezerman
aInternational Society for Gender Medicine, Tel Aviv 64325, Israel;bSackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel;cThe Israel Society for Gender Medicine, Petah Tikva 49100, Israel;dResearch Center for Gender Medicine, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva 49100, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: m@glezerman.com

This Letter has a Reply and related content. Please see:

  • Sex beyond the genitalia: The human brain mosaic
  • Reply to Glezerman: Why differences between brains of females and brains of males do not “add up” to create two types of brains
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

In a recent PNAS paper (1), Joel et al. examine several large datasets of MRI images and surveys of human brains. The authors conclude that brains of women and men are not dimorphic and not categorically different, as are the genital systems of the two genders, but resemble more an overlapping mosaic of specific functional regions and therefore cannot be distinguished as male and female brains. This conclusion cannot be drawn based on the methodology used. MRIs are “still images.” Looking at these is more akin to examining a road map and drawing conclusions about traffic patterns. Other imaging methods might have yielded different results (2). Reality is not fully revealed from quantities or distributions of quantities but from the functionality of the system. There are functional differences in various activity centers in the brain while performing physical or cognitive tasks or undergoing emotional experiences, but there are no morphological distinctions between brains that experience pain, happiness or sorrow, love or hate, empathy or compassion. There was in fact no need for such an elaborate study that eventually corroborates a rather obvious fact: that one cannot morphologically distinguish between a male and a female brain like one can concerning male and female genitalia. Whenever the terms “female brain” and “male brain” are used, the intention should be functional and not morphological, qualitative and not quantitative. Functionally, brains of women and men are indeed different. Not better, not worse, neither more nor less sophisticated, just different. The very brain cells differ chromosomally. The male brain is exposed to a completely different hormonal environment during intrauterine life than the female brain. The available scientific data as to the crucial effect of testosterone on the developing male brain is overwhelming (3, 4).

Our gonads function differently because of differences in the hypothalamus, pituitary, and gonad axis. These brain regions look morphologically exactly the same; the hormones secreted are exactly the same, just the patterns of secretion are different—pulsatile in the female and almost constant in the male—which leads to fundamentally different gonadal function. The future effects of highly elevated testosterone in the male fetus are numerous, including behavioral characteristics, toy preferences, verbality (5), and many other features. Of course, this is not categorical and overlaps are common. Consider the heart, which is morphologically indistinguishable between the sexes; however, more women than men who suffer from a heart attack will have open coronary arteries and atypical symptoms. Consider drugs: prophylactic aspirin taken by women will more often prevent strokes, and if taken by men will more often prevent a heart attack. Consider the gastrointestinal system: passage time of food and drugs will more often be longer in women than in men, with consequences for drug absorption and food digestion. Most functional differences of our bodily systems are controlled by our functionally different brains, and yes, there is a female and a male brain.

Footnotes

  • ↵1Email: m{at}glezerman.com.
  • Author contributions: M.G. analyzed data and wrote the paper.

  • The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Joel D, et al.
    (2015) Sex beyond the genitalia: The human brain mosaic. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(50):15468–15473
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Ingalhalikar M, et al.
    (2014) Sex differences in the structural connectome of the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(2):823–828
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Abramov I,
    2. Gordon J,
    3. Feldman O,
    4. Chavarga A
    (2012) Sex & vision I: Spatio-temporal resolution. Biol Sex Differ 3(1):20
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Chura LR, et al.
    (2010) Organizational effects of fetal testosterone on human corpus callosum size and asymmetry. Psychoneuroendocrinology 35(1):122–132
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Shaywitz BA, et al.
    (1995) Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language. Nature 373(6515):607–609, 373, 6515
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Yes, there is a female and a male brain: Morphology versus functionality
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
Citation Tools
Yes, there is a female and a male brain
Marek Glezerman
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Apr 2016, 113 (14) E1971; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1524418113

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Yes, there is a female and a male brain
Marek Glezerman
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Apr 2016, 113 (14) E1971; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1524418113
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 116 (47)
Current Issue

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Article Classifications

  • Biological Sciences
  • Neuroscience

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Either our Sun is subtly different from superflare stars, or a superflare in our solar system is possible in the foreseeable future. Image credit: SOHO/EIT (ESA and NASA).
Core Concept: What are the chances of a hazardous solar superflare?
Either our Sun is subtly different from superflare stars, or a superflare in our solar system is possible in the foreseeable future.
Image credit: SOHO/EIT (ESA and NASA).
Analysis of 80,000-year-old footprints offers insights into Neandertal social structure. Image courtesy of Dominique Cliquet.
Neandertal footprints and social structure
Analysis of 80,000-year-old footprints offers insights into Neandertal social structure.
Image courtesy of Dominique Cliquet.
Comparisons of archival and modern data suggest the Thwaites Eastern Ice Shelf thinned by 10-33% between 1978 and 2009. Image courtesy of James Yungel/NASA ICE.
Radar data on Antarctic ice sheet
Comparisons of archival and modern data suggest the Thwaites Eastern Ice Shelf thinned by 10–33% between 1978 and 2009.
Image courtesy of James Yungel/NASA ICE.
Across most ancient and modern mammalian orders, male specimens outnumber female specimens in many museum collections. Image courtesy of ddouk/pixabay.
Bias in mammalian specimen collections
Across most ancient and modern mammalian orders, male specimens outnumber female specimens in many museum collections.
Image courtesy of Pixabay/ddouk.
QnAs with NAS member and parasitologist Patricia Johnson. Image courtesy of Joy Ahn (University of California, Los Angeles, CA).
Featured QnAs
QnAs with NAS member and parasitologist Patricia Johnson
Image courtesy of Joy Ahn (University of California, Los Angeles, CA).

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive

PNAS Portals

  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Teaching Resources
  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2019 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490