Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
Letter

Yes, there is a female and a male brain: Morphology versus functionality

Marek Glezerman
  1. aInternational Society for Gender Medicine, Tel Aviv 64325, Israel;
  2. bSackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel;
  3. cThe Israel Society for Gender Medicine, Petah Tikva 49100, Israel;
  4. dResearch Center for Gender Medicine, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva 49100, Israel

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS April 5, 2016 113 (14) E1971; first published March 8, 2016; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1524418113
Marek Glezerman
aInternational Society for Gender Medicine, Tel Aviv 64325, Israel;
bSackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel;
cThe Israel Society for Gender Medicine, Petah Tikva 49100, Israel;
dResearch Center for Gender Medicine, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva 49100, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: m@glezerman.com

This Letter has a Reply and related content. Please see:

  • Sex beyond the genitalia: The human brain mosaic - November 30, 2015
  • Relationship between Letter and Reply - March 08, 2016
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

In a recent PNAS paper (1), Joel et al. examine several large datasets of MRI images and surveys of human brains. The authors conclude that brains of women and men are not dimorphic and not categorically different, as are the genital systems of the two genders, but resemble more an overlapping mosaic of specific functional regions and therefore cannot be distinguished as male and female brains. This conclusion cannot be drawn based on the methodology used. MRIs are “still images.” Looking at these is more akin to examining a road map and drawing conclusions about traffic patterns. Other imaging methods might have yielded different results (2). Reality is not fully revealed from quantities or distributions of quantities but from the functionality of the system. There are functional differences in various activity centers in the brain while performing physical or cognitive tasks or undergoing emotional experiences, but there are no morphological distinctions between brains that experience pain, happiness or sorrow, love or hate, empathy or compassion. There was in fact no need for such an elaborate study that eventually corroborates a rather obvious fact: that one cannot morphologically distinguish between a male and a female brain like one can concerning male and female genitalia. Whenever the terms “female brain” and “male brain” are used, the intention should be functional and not morphological, qualitative and not quantitative. Functionally, brains of women and men are indeed different. Not better, not worse, neither more nor less sophisticated, just different. The very brain cells differ chromosomally. The male brain is exposed to a completely different hormonal environment during intrauterine life than the female brain. The available scientific data as to the crucial effect of testosterone on the developing male brain is overwhelming (3, 4).

Our gonads function differently because of differences in the hypothalamus, pituitary, and gonad axis. These brain regions look morphologically exactly the same; the hormones secreted are exactly the same, just the patterns of secretion are different—pulsatile in the female and almost constant in the male—which leads to fundamentally different gonadal function. The future effects of highly elevated testosterone in the male fetus are numerous, including behavioral characteristics, toy preferences, verbality (5), and many other features. Of course, this is not categorical and overlaps are common. Consider the heart, which is morphologically indistinguishable between the sexes; however, more women than men who suffer from a heart attack will have open coronary arteries and atypical symptoms. Consider drugs: prophylactic aspirin taken by women will more often prevent strokes, and if taken by men will more often prevent a heart attack. Consider the gastrointestinal system: passage time of food and drugs will more often be longer in women than in men, with consequences for drug absorption and food digestion. Most functional differences of our bodily systems are controlled by our functionally different brains, and yes, there is a female and a male brain.

Footnotes

  • ↵1Email: m{at}glezerman.com.
  • Author contributions: M.G. analyzed data and wrote the paper.

  • The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Joel D, et al.
    (2015) Sex beyond the genitalia: The human brain mosaic. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(50):15468–15473
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Ingalhalikar M, et al.
    (2014) Sex differences in the structural connectome of the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(2):823–828
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Abramov I,
    2. Gordon J,
    3. Feldman O,
    4. Chavarga A
    (2012) Sex & vision I: Spatio-temporal resolution. Biol Sex Differ 3(1):20
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Chura LR, et al.
    (2010) Organizational effects of fetal testosterone on human corpus callosum size and asymmetry. Psychoneuroendocrinology 35(1):122–132
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Shaywitz BA, et al.
    (1995) Sex differences in the functional organization of the brain for language. Nature 373(6515):607–609, 373, 6515
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Yes, there is a female and a male brain: Morphology versus functionality
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Yes, there is a female and a male brain
Marek Glezerman
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Apr 2016, 113 (14) E1971; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1524418113

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Yes, there is a female and a male brain
Marek Glezerman
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Apr 2016, 113 (14) E1971; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1524418113
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Article Classifications

  • Biological Sciences
  • Neuroscience
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 113 (14)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Indus River.
Lockdowns and snow melt in South Asia
Relatively clean snow and ice in the Indus River Basin during the COVID-19 pandemic may have reduced meltwater in 2020, compared with the 20-year average.
Image credit: Pixabay/Abdullah_Shakoor.
Water ice clouds on modern Mars.
Greenhouse warming of early Mars
Atmospheric and climate conditions could have created a cloud greenhouse effect to warm Mars and support liquid surface water.
Image credit: NASA/JPL/MSSS.
Researchers report a safety guideline to limit airborne transmission of COVID-19.
Risk of indoor aerosol transmission
Researchers report a safety guideline to limit airborne transmission of COVID-19 that goes beyond the six-foot social distancing guideline.
Image credit: Pixabay/Matryx.
Aerial view of modern wastewater treatment plants with aeration tanks and clarification tanks.
News Feature: Microbes for better sewage treatment
Going beyond conventional approaches, researchers are using carefully cultured bacterial communities to improve sewage treatment.
Image credit: Shutterstock/chekart.
Illustration of colorful carbon nanotube-like figure with a meadow at the center.
Opinion: We can use carbon to decarbonize—and get hydrogen for free
What if we stopped using oil and gas as fuels and instead use them as sources of both hydrogen for fuel and carbon for useful, pervasive materials?
Nanotube image credit: Shutterstock/Gl0ck; Field image credit: Shutterstock/Evgeny Karandaev.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Cozzarelli Prize
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490. PNAS is a partner of CHORUS, COPE, CrossRef, ORCID, and Research4Life.