Electric field-induced superconducting transition of insulating FeSe thin film at 35 K

Kota Hanzawa; Hikaru Sato; Hidenori Hiramatsu; Toshio Kamiya; Hideo Hosono

doi:10.1073/pnas.1520810113

Edited by Laura H. Greene, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, IL, and approved March 7, 2016 (received for review October 21, 2015)

Significance

One of the key strategies for obtaining higher superconducting critical temperature (T_c) is to dope carriers into an insulator parent material with strong electron correlation. Here, we examined electrostatic carrier doping to insulator-like thin (∼10-nm-thick) FeSe epitaxial films using an electric double-layer transistor (EDLT) structure. The maximum T_c obtained is 35 K, which is 4× higher than that of bulk FeSe. This result demonstrates that EDLTs are useful tools to explore the ultimate T_c for insulating parent materials, and opens a way to explore high-T_c superconductivity, where carrier doping is difficult by conventional chemical substitution.

Abstract

It is thought that strong electron correlation in an insulating parent phase would enhance a critical temperature (T_c) of superconductivity in a doped phase via enhancement of the binding energy of a Cooper pair as known in high-T_c cuprates. To induce a superconductor transition in an insulating phase, injection of a high density of carriers is needed (e.g., by impurity doping). An electric double-layer transistor (EDLT) with an ionic liquid gate insulator enables such a field-induced transition to be investigated and is expected to result in a high T_c because it is free from deterioration in structure and carrier transport that are in general caused by conventional carrier doping (e.g., chemical substitution). Here, for insulating epitaxial thin films (∼10 nm thick) of FeSe, we report a high T_c of 35 K, which is 4× higher than that of bulk FeSe, using an EDLT under application of a gate bias of +5.5 V. Hall effect measurements under the gate bias suggest that highly accumulated electron carrier in the channel, whose area density is estimated to be 1.4 × 10¹⁵ cm^–2 (the average volume density of 1.7 × 10²¹ cm^–3), is the origin of the high-T_c superconductivity. This result demonstrates that EDLTs are useful tools to explore the ultimate T_c for insulating parent materials.

Prediction of new high critical temperature (T_c) superconductors is one of the most difficult issues in condensed matter physics, although theories and calculation methods have recently been very rapidly advancing (1). There is a common feature of high-T_c superconductors, copper-based oxides (cuprates) (2), and iron-based pnictides/selenides (3): Their superconductivity emerges when the long-range antiferromagnetic order in their parent phases is suppressed by doping with a high density of carriers. However, the maximum T_c of iron-based pnictides/selenides [55 K for SmFeAs(O_1–xF_x)] (4) is much lower than that of cuprates (134 K for HgBa₂Ca₂Cu₃O_8+δ) (5), although a very thin monolayer of FeSe with T_c = 109 K has been reported exceptionally (6). This difference in T_c is related to the different electron correlation interactions in these material systems. The parent phase of cuprates is a Mott insulator in which electron–electron Coulomb repulsion is very strong, whereas almost all of the iron-based parent phases are “(poor) metals,” not insulators, because of weak electron correlations. According to this high-T_c cuprate scenario, we consider that an important strategy to obtain higher T_c in iron-based superconductors is to dope carriers into the insulating parent phase with strong electron correlation to induce an insulator–superconductor transition.

In 2014, we first reported an electric field-induced phase transition in the iron-based insulator TlFe_1.6Se₂ (7), to the best of our knowledge. An electric double-layer transistor (EDLT) structure with an ion-liquid gate was used to examine electrostatic carrier doping because the ion-liquid gate has a large capacitance and provides an effective way to accumulate carriers at much higher densities (e.g., maximum sheet carrier density of ∼10¹⁵ cm^–2) (8 ⇓⇓–11) than those obtained by conventional solid-state gate materials such as amorphous SiO_x (10¹²–10¹³ cm⁻²). The TlFe_1.6Se₂ EDLT showed that using EDLTs is an effective way to explore phase transitions in iron-based high-T_c pnictides/selenides, where carrier doping by conventional chemical substitution is difficult. A phase transition from a superconducting state to an insulating state has been observed in an EDLT using single crystals of (Li, Fe)OHFeSe (12). In addition, an enhancement of T_c has been observed in EDLTs using superconducting FeSe (13). However, direct induction of superconductivity from an insulating phase has not been achieved in EDLTs using iron-based layered pnictides/selenides, although this type of phase transition is very drastic and interesting.

Very thin (∼10-nm-thick) FeSe epitaxial films are an interesting material to investigate field effects and to explore high T_c because thin FeSe films exhibit insulator-like behavior (14, 15). Considering the fact that bulk FeSe is a superconductor with T_c ∼ 8 K (16), the origin of the insulator-like behavior in the FeSe epitaxial films is thought to originate from lattice strain (15), which would be similar to a recently reported strain-induced superconductivity in BaFe₂As₂ (17). Furthermore, it has been reported that monolayer-thick FeSe exhibits very high T_c values of 50–109 K (6, 18). These results imply that an epitaxial strain has a key factor to controlling its electronic phase diagram in iron-based superconductors.

In this study, we focused on EDLT-based field effects of ∼10-nm-thick FeSe epitaxial films and observed an insulator–superconductor transition with a highest T_c of 35 K under a gate bias of V_G = +5.5 V. The origin of this superconductivity is also discussed.

Fig. 1 summarizes the structure and the relationship between the temperature (T) and the resistivity (ρ) of ∼10-nm-thick FeSe epitaxial films on SrTiO₃ (STO) (001) grown by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE). Fig. 1 A and B shows an out-of-plane X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern and an out-of-plane X-ray rocking curve (XRC) of FeSe 001 diffraction, respectively, indicating strong c-axis preferential orientation of the films (a wide-range pattern for 2θ = 10–80° is shown in Fig. S1A, confirming that there is no impurity phase). Because of the atomically flat surface of STO substrate, clear Kikuchi patterns in the reflective high-energy electron diffraction (RHEED) pattern, a step-and-terrace structure with a terrace width of ∼120 nm, and no step-bunching are observed in Fig. 1 C and E (see the cross-section of the STO substrate surface in Fig. S2B). Heteroepitaxial growth of the FeSe film on STO is confirmed by the RHEED pattern in Fig. 1D (2θ_χ-fixed ϕ scan of FeSe 200 in-plane diffraction is also shown in Fig. S1B), and the film has an atomically flat surface with root-mean-square roughness of 0.6 nm (Fig. 1F). It was confirmed that the chemical composition is 1.1:1 in the Fe:Se atomic ratio (measured with an electron probe microanalyzer). Fig. 1G shows ρ–T curves of the 11-nm-thick FeSe film compared with a 110-nm-thick film. The thick film (110 nm) did not show zero resistance when T was decreased to 4 K, whereas superconductivity with an onset T_c ∼ 9 K was confirmed by its external magnetic field dependence (Fig. 1H), i.e., a negative shift of T_c with increasing external magnetic field. However, in the case of the thin films (11 nm thick, see Fig. S3 for determination of the thickness by X-ray reflectivity measurement), the ρ–T curve shows insulator-like behavior, i.e., ρ increased with decreasing T. The lattice parameters of the 11-nm-thick films are a_film = 0.3838 nm for the a axis (see Fig. S4 for in-plane XRD patterns) and c_film = 0.5448 nm for the c axis (calculated from the peak position of out-of-plane FeSe 004 diffraction, Fig. S1A). Because the values of a bulk sample are reported to be a_bulk = 0.37704 nm and c_bulk = 0.55161 nm (19), there is in-plane tensile strain [(a_film−a_bulk)/a_bulk = Δa/a_bulk = +1.8%] but out-of-plane compressive strain (Δc/c_bulk = −1.2%). These results indicate that the insulator-like behavior of the epitaxial film originates from the in-plane tensile strain, as reported in ref. 15. Because the insulating state is the main focus of this study, we selected the thin (∼10 nm) FeSe epitaxial layer as an active channel layer for the EDLT.

Fig. 1.

Approximately 10-nm-thick FeSe films grown on STO (001) single-crystal substrates by MBE. (A) Out-of-plane XRD pattern. Vertical bars indicate Pendellösung interference fringes around FeSe 001 diffraction, originating from its flat surface. (B) Out-of-plane XRC of FeSe 001 diffraction. The full width at half maximum (FWHM) is 0.009°. RHEED patterns of the (C) STO substrate and (D) as-grown FeSe film surfaces. AFM images of the (E) STO substrate and (F) FeSe film surfaces. Horizontal bars indicate the height scales for each image. (G) ρ–T curves of the 11-nm-thick film compared with a 110-nm-thick film. (H) External magnetic field dependence of the ρ–T curves of the 110-nm-thick sample, confirming that the film is a superconductor.

Fig. S1.

XRD patterns of the epitaxial FeSe film grown on the STO (001) substrate. (A) Out-of-plane XRD pattern. (B) In-plane ϕ-scans of STO 200 (Bottom) and FeSe 200 (Top) diffractions. These results indicate that the FeSe film grows heteroepitaxially on STO with the epitaxial relationship of [001] FeSe || [001] STO for out-of-plane and [100] FeSe || [100] STO for in-plane.

Fig. S2.

(A) AFM image of the STO (001) substrate. (B) Cross-section along the horizontal line in A, indicating that the step height and terrace width are 0.4 and 120 nm, respectively. The step height is the same as the unit cell size of STO.

Fig. S3.

X-ray reflectivity spectrum of the ∼10-nm-thick FeSe epitaxial film. The thickness of this film is determined to be 12.4 nm from the fitting result.

Fig. S4.

In-plane XRD patterns of the 11-nm-thick FeSe film. (A) ϕ-Coupled 2θ_χ-scan, and (B) enlarged pattern and deconvolution result to determine the in-plane lattice parameter. The calculated a-axis length is 0.3838 nm.

We fabricated EDLTs using a thin insulating FeSe layer, as shown in Fig. 2A. The ionic liquid N,N-diethyl-N-methyl-N-(2-methoxyethyl)-ammonium bis-(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide (DEME-TFSI) was used as the gate insulator. Fig. 2B shows the cyclic transfer characteristics [drain current (I_D) versus gate bias (V_G)] of the FeSe EDLT under a drain voltage V_D = +0.5 V measured at T = 220 K. A positive V_G up to +4 V was applied to the gate electrode, which accumulates carrier electrons in the FeSe surface. When V_G = +3.1 V was applied, I_D began increasing. The maximum I_D in the transfer curve reached 45 μA at V_G = +4 V, along with an on–off ratio of ∼2. The gate leakage current (I_G, shown in Fig. 2B, Bottom) also increased with increasing V_G up to +4 V, but it was 3 orders of magnitude lower than I_D in the whole V_G region. After applying V_G = +4 V, I_D returned to the initial value when V_G was decreased to 0 V. A large hysteresis loop is observed because of the slow response of ion displacement in the ionic liquid. Notwithstanding there is a slight parallel shift in the second I_D−V_G loop and I_D becomes almost double, 84 μA at V_G = +4 V; its origin is considered to be the slow response of ion displacement, which is the same as the hysteresis loop. This is because the shape and hysteresis width in the second loop are very similar to those in the first loop. In addition, we confirmed that there was no change in the I−V characteristics in the channel layer at V_G = 0 before and after the cyclic measurements (see Fig. S5 for the I−V characteristics). Here, we point out that it has been reported that EDLT using an STO channel exhibits similar characteristics, i.e., it also turns on at about V_G = +3 V (8). In addition, it has recently been reported that oxygen vacancies are induced in an oxide-based EDLT and the metal state is stabilized even after removing the gate bias and ionic liquid (10). However, the above results in Fig. 2 and Fig. S5 guarantee that the observed results are reversible and reproducible. These results demonstrate that the origin of superconductivity by applying gate bias, which will be shown in Fig. 3 later, is not due to the modification of the surface chemical/mechanical structures but the electrostatically accumulated carriers.

Fig. 2.

(A) Device structure and photograph of the EDLT using the thin insulating FeSe layer as a channel. (B) Transfer characteristics (drain current I_D versus gate bias V_G) of the FeSe EDLT under V_D = +0.5 V at T = 220 K cyclically measured for two loops. The arrows indicate the V_G-sweep directions starting from V_G = 0 V. (Bottom) The leakage current (I_G) versus V_G is also shown.

Fig. 3.

Carrier transport properties of the FeSe EDLT under applied biases V_G = 0 – +5.5 V. (A) R_s–T curves. (B) Enlarged image of A in the T range 0–60 K at V_G = +4 – +5.5 V. Solid lines are used to determine the onset T_c. (C) External magnetic field dependence of R_s–T curves at V_G = +5.5 V. (D) Hall coefficients (R_H) at 40 K as a function of V_G. (Inset) Transverse Hall resistance (R_xy) at 40 K under external magnetic fields up to 5 T to obtain R_H.

Fig. S5.

I–V characteristics of the FeSe EDLT at V_G = 0 measured at 220 K. Before (squares) and after (circles) the first cyclic measurement of the I_D–V_G curve in Fig. 2B. The latter characteristic was unchanged before the second cyclic measurement. After the second cyclic measurement of the I_D–V_G curve in Fig. 2B (triangles). These results confirm that there is no change in the channel layer.

Fig. 3 summarizes carrier transport properties of the FeSe EDLT, where V_G was applied at 220 K and kept constant during the measurements with decreasing T. As shown in Fig. 3A, the sheet resistance (R_s)–T curves at V_G = 0 – +3.5 V almost overlap in the whole T range. In contrast, when V_G is increased to +3.75 V, R_s in the normal-state region slightly decreases, indicating that the induced carrier density is increased by applying V_G = +3.75 V. When V_G = +4 V is applied, a broad R_s drop is observed at 8.6 K (Fig. 3B). With further increase in V_G, this R_s drop shifts to higher T. It should be noted that zero resistance is clearly observed at 4 K along with the onset T = 24 K when V_G = +5 V is applied. From V_G = +5 V to +5.5 V, there is a clear enhancement of the onset T of the R_s drop (from 24 to 35 K) along with reduction of the normal-state resistivity. Fig. 3C shows the magnetic field dependence at V_G = +5.5 V, confirming its superconducting transition, i.e., the onset T_c shifts to lower T with increasing external magnetic field. The superconducting state remains even when the external magnetic field is increased to 9 T, indicating that the upper critical magnetic field is considerably higher than 9 T. The upper critical field estimated from Fig. 3C using Werthamer–Helfand–Hohenberg theory (20) is ∼70 T (Fig. S6), which is much higher than that (30 T) of bulk FeSe (21).

Fig. S6.

Upper critical field (µ₀H_c2) as a function of temperature of FeSe EDLT under applying V_G = +4.0 V (Fig. 3D). (A) Least-square fitting result. (B) The estimated µ₀H_c2 at 0 K using Werthamer–Helfand–Hohenberg theory (ref. 20 in the main text) is 70 T. α and λ denote Pauli spin paramagnetism and spin–orbit interaction parameters, respectively. Here, we select α = 0 and λ = 0.

To confirm high-density carrier accumulation in the EDLT, we performed Hall effect measurements under applying V_G up to +5.5 V. Fig. 3D shows Hall coefficients R_H at 40 K. Positive R_H are obtained at each V_G applied, indicating that the major carrier in the insulator-like FeSe epitaxial films is hole and consistent with the result in an FeSe single crystal (22), although negative R_H in low magnetic fields is also reported in this temperature range (23). At V_G = 0 V, the R_H is +1.1 × 10⁻² cm³/C, which is slightly higher than (+2 × 10⁻³ cm³/C) as reported in ref. 22. With increase in V_G to +3.5 V, R_H remains almost constant, which is consistent with R_s–T curves in Fig. 3A; i.e., they almost overlap in the whole T range. With further increase in V_G up to +5.5 V, R_H decreases linearly to +2.7 × 10⁻³ cm³/C. It is reported that FeSe bulk is a multiband metal, indicating that high-density electrons and holes (both are orders of 10²⁰ cm^–3) (23) intrinsically coexist and make its carrier transport properties very complicated. In addition, the electronic structure of this insulator-like FeSe epitaxial film is still unclear. However, to roughly estimate the electron density accumulated in the channel surface by positive V_G, we subtracted the 1/eR_H value (corresponds to the carrier density for a single band model) at V_G = 0 V from all of the 1/eR_H values on an assumption that the linear decrease in R_H with increasing V_G in the V_G range from 3.75 to 5.5 V corresponds to the increase in the sheet density of the accumulated electrons [ΔN_e = (1/eR_H (V_G = x) – 1/eR_H (V_G = 0)) × t, where t is thickness of the FeSe channel (8.3 nm)]. Then we built a phase diagram (Fig. 4). T_c vs. (V_G or R_H at 40 K) are also shown in Fig. S7 for comparison. At 8.1 × 10¹³ cm^–2 (V_G = +4 V), onset T_c of 8.6 K, which is close to that of bulk (16), was observed as seen in Fig. 3B. If we suppose that the whole channel layer is accumulated by electrons, the average electron density is estimated to be 9.8 × 10¹⁹ cm^–3. This value is consistent with the native carrier concentration in bulk FeSe, the order of 10²⁰ cm^–3 (22). With linear increase in ΔN_e up to 1.4 × 10¹⁵ cm^–2 (the average carrier density of 1.7 × 10²¹ cm^–3), the maximum onset T_c of 35 K was observed. This result suggests that FeSe has a potential exhibiting such a high T_c if such high-density carrier doping is possible. Actually, it is reported that external high pressures lead to this high-T_c range superconductivity (27–37 K) (24, 25) without impurity doping, demonstrating its high-T_c’s potential.

Fig. 4.

Electronic phase diagram of the FeSe EDLT. Circles and squares show onset T_c (T_c^onset) and zero resistivity temperature (T_c^zero), respectively. ΔN_e indicates the accumulated electron sheet carrier density (estimated) under V_G. The corresponding V_G are shown in the upper horizontal axis.

Fig. S7.

Electronic phase diagrams of the FeSe EDLT. (Left) T_c vs. V_G and (Right) T_c vs. R_H at 40 K. Circles and squares show onset T_c (T_c^onset) and zero resistivity temperature (T_c^zero), respectively. For a phase diagram (T_c vs. estimated sheet carrier density), see Fig. 4 in the main text.

The above observation suggests that applying a gate bias changes the structure and/or the electronic state of the FeSe epitaxial films. Thus, we would like to discuss the origin of this high-T_c superconductivity. First, we discuss the possibility of a chemical reaction between the FeSe channel and the DEME-TFSI ionic liquid. Fig. 5A shows XRD patterns of the FeSe film dipped in DEME-TFSI without an applied gate bias. No impurity phase was detected, which is confirmed by the wide-range pattern from 2θ = 10–80° in Fig. S8A, indicating that neither a chemical reaction between the FeSe film and DEME-TFSI nor a lattice parameter change occurs. We then examined the effect of applying V_G = +5 V for 2 h (Fig. 5B). In this case, we also did not observe a change in the XRD patterns (no impurity phase was detected, as confirmed by the wide-range pattern from 2θ = 10–80° in Fig. S8B). These results indicate that the FeSe layer is stable against DEME-TFSI solution, and the ions in DEME-TFSI do not intercalate into the FeSe lattice [the interaction of amide ions and/or ammonia molecules with the FeSe lattice induces a distinct expansion of the c-axis length (26)]. Thus, it is plausible that the origin of this high-T_c superconductivity is field-accumulated carrier doping. We speculate that an electronic transition similar to that under high pressures would be related to this high-T_c superconductivity because their maximum T_c values are similar (27–37 K for the high-pressure cases) (24, 25).

Fig. 5.

XRD patterns of FeSe films dipped in DEME-TFSI. The intensity is normalized by that of STO 001 diffraction of the as-grown sample. (A) Dipped in DEME-TFSI for 6 h under a vacuum without applying a bias voltage. (B) Dipped in DEME-TFSI for 2 h under a vacuum with V_G = +5 V.

Fig. S8.

XRD patterns of FeSe films dipped in DEME-TFSI. The intensity is normalized by that of STO 001 diffraction of the as-grown sample. (A) Dipped for 6 h under vacuum without an applied bias. (B) Dipped under vacuum with V_G = +5 V.

In summary, we grew high-quality ∼10-nm-thick FeSe epitaxial films on STO (001) substrates by MBE and confirmed their insulating electrical property. Using the high-quality thin film as a channel layer, we fabricated an EDLT to induce high-T_c superconductivity. Upon applying V_G = +5.0 V, an insulator–superconductor transition was induced with an onset T_c = 24 K. The highest T_c of 35 K was obtained by applying V_G = +5.5 V. This T_c value is significantly enhanced compared with the value of bulk FeSe (T_c ∼ 8 K). Note that the origin of the superconductivity is not in the STO substrate because the T_c of STO is as low as 0.2–0.4 K even if an EDLT structure is used (8, 27). Hall effect measurements suggest that the high-T_c superconductivity comes from the highly accumulated electron carries in the FeSe channel surface. The relationship between T_c and accumulated carrier density indicates that T_c in FeSe channel increases monotonically to a breakdown voltage (V_G > +5.5 V). The present study provides a way to investigate superconducting transitions even with an insulating parent phase without alteration/deterioration by impurity doping.

Experiments

Heteroepitaxial FeSe thin films were grown on (001)-oriented STO single crystals by the MBE technique. To obtain an atomically flat substrate surface, we performed wet etching of as-received STO using a buffered HF solution, and then thermally annealed at 1,050 °C just before film growth (28). The base pressure of the MBE growth chamber was <1 × 10⁻⁷ Pa. We used two types of Knudsen cells (K cells) to extract pure Fe and Se molecular beams: a high-temperature K cell with a carbon heater for Fe (purity: 99.99%) and a normal K cell with a tantalum heater for Se (purity: 99.999%). The temperatures of both K cells were optimized to 1,100 °C for Fe and 140 °C for Se using a beam flux monitor near the substrate. The optimized substrate temperature was 500 °C. The film thicknesses were ∼10 and 110 nm, which were determined by least-squares fitting to a fringe pattern obtained by X-ray reflectivity spectroscopy using Cu Kα₁ monochromated by a Ge (220) crystal. The surfaces of the STO substrates and the FeSe films were observed by in situ RHEED and atomic force microscopy (AFM) in ambient atmosphere.

The structures of the films, such as the crystal orientation, were precisely examined by XRD (source: monochromatic Cu Kα₁) with an analyzer crystal located in front of the detector. The ω-coupled 2θ scans in the out-of-plane XRD measurements provided the crystallographic orientation of the film normal to the substrate surface. The tilting angle of the crystallites was obtained by 2θ-fixed ω-scans (out-of-plane XRC). The in-plane crystallographic orientation (i.e., orientation parallel to the substrate surface) was determined by ϕ-coupled 2θ_χ-scans. A 2θ_χ-fixed ϕ-scan also provided the rotational symmetry of the lattice/crystallites in the film plane. All of the axis relations of XRD can be found in ref. 29. The chemical compositions of the films (i.e., atomic ratio of Fe and Se) were determined with an electron probe microanalyzer using wavelength-dispersive spectroscopy mode.

Approximately 10-nm-thick FeSe epitaxial films on the STO (001) substrates were used as the transport channel of the EDLT. The FeSe channel layer with a six-terminal Hall bar geometry (channel size: 500 μm long and 200 μm wide) and the Au pad electrodes were deposited using shadow masks. After bonding metal wires to the Au pads with In metal, the channel region was covered with a silica-glass cup (fixed with an epoxy adhesive) to add the ionic liquid. We used the ionic liquid DEME-TFSI as the medium for the gate insulator. The ionic liquid was poured into the silica-glass cup, and then a Pt coil was inserted into the ionic liquid to serve as the gate electrode. All of these device setup processes were performed without exposure to air. The device structure is shown in Fig. 2A.

Transfer curves (i.e., the V_G dependence of the drain current I_D) were measured with a semiconductor parameter analyzer at 220 K. The temperature dependences of the resistivity and sheet resistance (ρ–T and R_s–T), and transverse resistance (R_xy, i.e., Hall effect) at 40 K of the films and EDLTs were measured by the four-probe method under external magnetic fields of up to 9 T under an applied gate bias (V_G) from 0 to +5.5 V. V_G was applied at 220 K because chemical reaction between FeSe layers and DEME-TFSI occurs at higher temperatures (30) and this temperature is well above the rubber phase-transition temperature of DEME-TFSI 190 K (31).

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology through Element Strategy Initiative to Form Core Research Center. H. Hiramatsu was also supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (A) Grant 25709058, JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas “Nano Informatics” (Grant 25106007), and Support for Tokyotech Advanced Research.

Footnotes

↵¹To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: h-hirama{at}lucid.msl.titech.ac.jp or hosono{at}msl.titech.ac.jp.

Author contributions: H. Hiramatsu and H. Hosono designed research; K.H., H.S., H. Hiramatsu, T.K., and H. Hosono performed research; and K.H., H.S., H. Hiramatsu, T.K., and H. Hosono wrote the paper.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1520810113/-/DCSupplemental.

References

↵
1. Hosono H, et al.
(2015) Exploration of new superconductors and functional materials, and fabrication of superconducting tapes and wires of iron pnictides. Sci Technol Adv Mater 16(3):033503
.
OpenUrl CrossRef
↵
1. Bednorz JG,
2. Müller KA
(1986) Possible high T_c superconductivity in the Ba-La-Cu-O system. Z Phys B: Condensed Matter 64(2):189–193
.
OpenUrl CrossRef
↵
1. Kamihara Y,
2. Watanabe T,
3. Hirano M,
4. Hosono H
(2008) Iron-based layered superconductor La[O_1−xF_x]FeAs (x = 0.05−0.12) with T_c = 26 K. J Am Chem Soc 130(11):3296–3297
.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed
↵
1. Ren ZA, et al.
(2008) Superconductivity at 55 K in iron-based F-doped layered quaternary compound Sm[O_1–xF_x]FeAs. Chin Phys Lett 25(6):2215–2216
.
OpenUrl CrossRef
↵
1. Schilling A,
2. Cantoni M,
3. Guo JD,
4. Ott HR
(1993) Superconductivity above 130 K in the Hg-Ba-Ca-Cu-O system. Nature 363(6424):56–58
.
OpenUrl CrossRef
↵
1. Ge JF, et al.
(2015) Superconductivity above 100 K in single-layer FeSe films on doped SrTiO₃. Nat Mater 14(3):285–289
.
OpenUrl PubMed
↵
1. Katase T,
2. Hiramatsu H,
3. Kamiya T,
4. Hosono H
(2014) Electric double-layer transistor using layered iron selenide Mott insulator TlFe_1.6Se₂. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(11):3979–3983
.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
1. Ueno K, et al.
(2008) Electric-field-induced superconductivity in an insulator. Nat Mater 7(11):855–858
.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed
↵
1. Nakano M, et al.
(2012) Collective bulk carrier delocalization driven by electrostatic surface charge accumulation. Nature 487(7408):459–462
.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed
↵
1. Jeong J, et al.
(2013) Suppression of metal-insulator transition in VO₂ by electric field-induced oxygen vacancy formation. Science 339(6126):1402–1405
.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
1. Fujimoto T,
2. Awaga K
(2013) Electric-double-layer field-effect transistors with ionic liquids. Phys Chem Chem Phys 15(23):8983–9006
.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed
↵
1. Lei B, et al.
(2016) Gate-tuned superconductor-insulator transition in (Li,Fe)OHFeSe. Phys Rev B 93(6):060501
.
OpenUrl CrossRef
↵
1. Lei B, et al.
(2016) Evolution of high-temperature superconductivity from a low-T_c phase tuned by carrier concentration in FeSe thin flakes. Phys Rev Lett 116(7):077002
.
↵
1. Wang MJ, et al.
(2009) Crystal orientation and thickness dependence of the superconducting transition temperature of tetragonal FeSe_1−x thin films. Phys Rev Lett 103(11):117002
.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed
↵
1. Nie YF, et al.
(2009) Suppression of superconductivity in FeSe films under tensile strain. Appl Phys Lett 94(24):242505
.
OpenUrl CrossRef
↵
1. Hsu FC, et al.
(2008) Superconductivity in the PbO-type structure α-FeSe. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(38):14262–14264
.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
1. Engelmann J, et al.
(2013) Strain induced superconductivity in the parent compound BaFe₂As₂. Nat Commun 4:2877
.
OpenUrl PubMed
↵
1. Wang QY, et al.
(2012) Interface-induced high-temperature superconductivity in single unit-cell FeSe films on SrTiO₃. Chin Phys Lett 29(3):037402
.
OpenUrl CrossRef
↵
1. Li Z, et al.
(2010) Structural and superconductivity study on α-FeSe_x. J Phys Chem Solids 71(4):495–498
.
OpenUrl CrossRef
↵
1. Werthamer NR,
2. Helfand E,
3. Hohenberg PC
(1966) Temperature and purity dependence of the superconducting critical field, H_c2. III. Electron spin and spin-orbit effects. Phys Rev 147(1):295–302
.
OpenUrl CrossRef
↵
1. Vedeneev SI,
2. Piot BA,
3. Maude DK,
4. Sadakov AV
(2013) Temperature dependence of the upper critical field of FeSe single crystals. Phys Rev B 87(13):134512
.
OpenUrl CrossRef
↵
1. Lei H, et al.
(2012) Multiband effects on β-FeSe single crystals. Phys Rev B 85(9):094515
.
OpenUrl CrossRef
↵
1. Watson MD, et al.
(2015) Dichotomy between the hole and electron behavior in multiband superconductor FeSe probed by ultrahigh magnetic fields. Phys Rev Lett 115(2):027006
.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed
↵
1. Mizuguchi Y,
2. Tomioka F,
3. Tsuda S,
4. Yamaguchi T,
5. Takano Y
(2008) Superconductivity at 27 K in tetragonal FeSe under high pressure. Appl Phys Lett 93(15):152505
.
OpenUrl CrossRef
↵
1. Medvedev S, et al.
(2009) Electronic and magnetic phase diagram of β-Fe_1.01Se with superconductivity at 36.7 K under pressure. Nat Mater 8(8):630–633
.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed
↵
1. Burrard-Lucas M, et al.
(2013) Enhancement of the superconducting transition temperature of FeSe by intercalation of a molecular spacer layer. Nat Mater 12(1):15–19
.
OpenUrl PubMed
↵
1. Schooley JF, et al.
(1965) Dependence of the superconducting transition temperature on carrier concentration in semiconducting SrTiO₃. Phys Rev Lett 14(9):305–307
.
OpenUrl CrossRef
↵
1. Kawasaki M, et al.
(1994) Atomic control of the SrTiO₃ crystal surface. Science 266(5190):1540–1542
.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text
↵
1. Hiramatsu H,
2. Kamiya T,
3. Hirano M,
4. Hosono H
(2009) Heteroepitaxial film growth of layered compounds with the ZrCuSiAs-type and ThCr₂Si₂-type structures: From Cu-based semiconductors to Fe-based superconductors. Physica C 469(9-12):657–666
.
OpenUrl CrossRef
↵
1. Yuan H, et al.
(2010) Electrostatic and electrochemical nature of liquid-gated electric-double-layer transistors based on oxide semiconductors. J Am Chem Soc 132(51):18402–18407
.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed
↵
1. Yuan H, et al.
(2009) High-density carrier accumulation in ZnO field-effect transistors gated by electric double layers of ionic liquids. Adv Funct Mater 19(7):1046–1053
.
OpenUrl CrossRef

Article Alerts

Email Article

Citation Tools

Request Permissions

Article Classifications

Physical Sciences
Physics

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 113 (15)

Table of Contents

Submit

[1] ↵
Hosono H, et al.
(2015) Exploration of new superconductors and functional materials, and fabrication of superconducting tapes and wires of iron pnictides. Sci Technol Adv Mater 16(3):033503
.
OpenUrl CrossRef

[2] Hosono H, et al.

[3] ↵
Bednorz JG,
Müller KA
(1986) Possible high T_c superconductivity in the Ba-La-Cu-O system. Z Phys B: Condensed Matter 64(2):189–193
.
OpenUrl CrossRef

[4] Bednorz JG,

[5] Müller KA

[6] ↵
Kamihara Y,
Watanabe T,
Hirano M,
Hosono H
(2008) Iron-based layered superconductor La[O_1−xF_x]FeAs (x = 0.05−0.12) with T_c = 26 K. J Am Chem Soc 130(11):3296–3297
.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed

[7] Kamihara Y,

[8] Watanabe T,

[9] Hirano M,

[10] Hosono H

[11] ↵
Ren ZA, et al.
(2008) Superconductivity at 55 K in iron-based F-doped layered quaternary compound Sm[O_1–xF_x]FeAs. Chin Phys Lett 25(6):2215–2216
.
OpenUrl CrossRef

[12] Ren ZA, et al.

[13] ↵
Schilling A,
Cantoni M,
Guo JD,
Ott HR
(1993) Superconductivity above 130 K in the Hg-Ba-Ca-Cu-O system. Nature 363(6424):56–58
.
OpenUrl CrossRef

[14] Schilling A,

[15] Cantoni M,

[16] Guo JD,

[17] Ott HR

[18] ↵
Ge JF, et al.
(2015) Superconductivity above 100 K in single-layer FeSe films on doped SrTiO₃. Nat Mater 14(3):285–289
.
OpenUrl PubMed

[19] Ge JF, et al.

[20] ↵
Katase T,
Hiramatsu H,
Kamiya T,
Hosono H
(2014) Electric double-layer transistor using layered iron selenide Mott insulator TlFe_1.6Se₂. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(11):3979–3983
.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text

[21] Katase T,

[22] Hiramatsu H,

[23] Kamiya T,

[24] Hosono H

[25] ↵
Ueno K, et al.
(2008) Electric-field-induced superconductivity in an insulator. Nat Mater 7(11):855–858
.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed

[26] Ueno K, et al.

[27] ↵
Nakano M, et al.
(2012) Collective bulk carrier delocalization driven by electrostatic surface charge accumulation. Nature 487(7408):459–462
.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed

[28] Nakano M, et al.

[29] ↵
Jeong J, et al.
(2013) Suppression of metal-insulator transition in VO₂ by electric field-induced oxygen vacancy formation. Science 339(6126):1402–1405
.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text

[30] Jeong J, et al.

[31] ↵
Fujimoto T,
Awaga K
(2013) Electric-double-layer field-effect transistors with ionic liquids. Phys Chem Chem Phys 15(23):8983–9006
.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed

[32] Fujimoto T,

[33] Awaga K

[34] ↵
Lei B, et al.
(2016) Gate-tuned superconductor-insulator transition in (Li,Fe)OHFeSe. Phys Rev B 93(6):060501
.
OpenUrl CrossRef

[35] Lei B, et al.

[36] ↵
Lei B, et al.
(2016) Evolution of high-temperature superconductivity from a low-T_c phase tuned by carrier concentration in FeSe thin flakes. Phys Rev Lett 116(7):077002
.

[37] Lei B, et al.

[38] ↵
Wang MJ, et al.
(2009) Crystal orientation and thickness dependence of the superconducting transition temperature of tetragonal FeSe_1−x thin films. Phys Rev Lett 103(11):117002
.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed

[39] Wang MJ, et al.

[40] ↵
Nie YF, et al.
(2009) Suppression of superconductivity in FeSe films under tensile strain. Appl Phys Lett 94(24):242505
.
OpenUrl CrossRef

[41] Nie YF, et al.

[42] ↵
Hsu FC, et al.
(2008) Superconductivity in the PbO-type structure α-FeSe. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(38):14262–14264
.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text

[43] Hsu FC, et al.

[44] ↵
Engelmann J, et al.
(2013) Strain induced superconductivity in the parent compound BaFe₂As₂. Nat Commun 4:2877
.
OpenUrl PubMed

[45] Engelmann J, et al.

[46] ↵
Wang QY, et al.
(2012) Interface-induced high-temperature superconductivity in single unit-cell FeSe films on SrTiO₃. Chin Phys Lett 29(3):037402
.
OpenUrl CrossRef

[47] Wang QY, et al.

[48] ↵
Li Z, et al.
(2010) Structural and superconductivity study on α-FeSe_x. J Phys Chem Solids 71(4):495–498
.
OpenUrl CrossRef

[49] Li Z, et al.

[50] ↵
Werthamer NR,
Helfand E,
Hohenberg PC
(1966) Temperature and purity dependence of the superconducting critical field, H_c2. III. Electron spin and spin-orbit effects. Phys Rev 147(1):295–302
.
OpenUrl CrossRef

[51] Werthamer NR,

[52] Helfand E,

[53] Hohenberg PC

[54] ↵
Vedeneev SI,
Piot BA,
Maude DK,
Sadakov AV
(2013) Temperature dependence of the upper critical field of FeSe single crystals. Phys Rev B 87(13):134512
.
OpenUrl CrossRef

[55] Vedeneev SI,

[56] Piot BA,

[57] Maude DK,

[58] Sadakov AV

[59] ↵
Lei H, et al.
(2012) Multiband effects on β-FeSe single crystals. Phys Rev B 85(9):094515
.
OpenUrl CrossRef

[60] Lei H, et al.

[61] ↵
Watson MD, et al.
(2015) Dichotomy between the hole and electron behavior in multiband superconductor FeSe probed by ultrahigh magnetic fields. Phys Rev Lett 115(2):027006
.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed

[62] Watson MD, et al.

[63] ↵
Mizuguchi Y,
Tomioka F,
Tsuda S,
Yamaguchi T,
Takano Y
(2008) Superconductivity at 27 K in tetragonal FeSe under high pressure. Appl Phys Lett 93(15):152505
.
OpenUrl CrossRef

[64] Mizuguchi Y,

[65] Tomioka F,

[66] Tsuda S,

[67] Yamaguchi T,

[68] Takano Y

[69] ↵
Medvedev S, et al.
(2009) Electronic and magnetic phase diagram of β-Fe_1.01Se with superconductivity at 36.7 K under pressure. Nat Mater 8(8):630–633
.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed

[70] Medvedev S, et al.

[71] ↵
Burrard-Lucas M, et al.
(2013) Enhancement of the superconducting transition temperature of FeSe by intercalation of a molecular spacer layer. Nat Mater 12(1):15–19
.
OpenUrl PubMed

[72] Burrard-Lucas M, et al.

[73] ↵
Schooley JF, et al.
(1965) Dependence of the superconducting transition temperature on carrier concentration in semiconducting SrTiO₃. Phys Rev Lett 14(9):305–307
.
OpenUrl CrossRef

[74] Schooley JF, et al.

[75] ↵
Kawasaki M, et al.
(1994) Atomic control of the SrTiO₃ crystal surface. Science 266(5190):1540–1542
.
OpenUrl Abstract/FREE Full Text

[76] Kawasaki M, et al.

[77] ↵
Hiramatsu H,
Kamiya T,
Hirano M,
Hosono H
(2009) Heteroepitaxial film growth of layered compounds with the ZrCuSiAs-type and ThCr₂Si₂-type structures: From Cu-based semiconductors to Fe-based superconductors. Physica C 469(9-12):657–666
.
OpenUrl CrossRef

[78] Hiramatsu H,

[79] Kamiya T,

[80] Hirano M,

[81] Hosono H

[82] ↵
Yuan H, et al.
(2010) Electrostatic and electrochemical nature of liquid-gated electric-double-layer transistors based on oxide semiconductors. J Am Chem Soc 132(51):18402–18407
.
OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed

[83] Yuan H, et al.

[84] ↵
Yuan H, et al.
(2009) High-density carrier accumulation in ZnO field-effect transistors gated by electric double layers of ionic liquids. Adv Funct Mater 19(7):1046–1053
.
OpenUrl CrossRef

[85] Yuan H, et al.

Main menu

User menu

Search

Electric field-induced superconducting transition of insulating FeSe thin film at 35 K

Significance

Abstract

Experiments

Acknowledgments

Footnotes

References

Citation Manager Formats

Article Classifications

You May Also be Interested in

Similar Articles

Articles

PNAS Portals

Information

Main menu

User menu

Search

Significance

Abstract

Experiments

Acknowledgments

Footnotes

References

Citation Manager Formats

Article Classifications

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

You May Also be Interested in

Similar Articles

Articles

PNAS Portals

Information