Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
Research Article

Global fishery prospects under contrasting management regimes

Christopher Costello, Daniel Ovando, Tyler Clavelle, C. Kent Strauss, Ray Hilborn, Michael C. Melnychuk, Trevor A. Branch, Steven D. Gaines, Cody S. Szuwalski, Reniel B. Cabral, Douglas N. Rader, and Amanda Leland
  1. aBren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106;
  2. bEnvironmental Defense Fund, New York, NY 10010;
  3. cSchool of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS May 3, 2016 113 (18) 5125-5129; first published March 28, 2016; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1520420113
Christopher Costello
aBren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: costello@bren.ucsb.edu
Daniel Ovando
aBren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tyler Clavelle
aBren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Kent Strauss
bEnvironmental Defense Fund, New York, NY 10010;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ray Hilborn
cSchool of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael C. Melnychuk
cSchool of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Trevor A. Branch
cSchool of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven D. Gaines
aBren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cody S. Szuwalski
aBren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Reniel B. Cabral
aBren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Douglas N. Rader
bEnvironmental Defense Fund, New York, NY 10010;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amanda Leland
bEnvironmental Defense Fund, New York, NY 10010;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  1. Edited by James A. Estes, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, and approved February 26, 2016 (received for review October 14, 2015)

This article has a Letter. Please see:

  • Relationship between Research Article and Letter - June 15, 2016
  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Significance

What would extensive fishery reform look like? In addition, what would be the benefits and trade-offs of implementing alternative approaches to fisheries management on a worldwide scale? To find out, we assembled the largest-of-its-kind database and coupled it to state-of-the-art bioeconomic models for more than 4,500 fisheries around the world. We find that, in nearly every country of the world, fishery recovery would simultaneously drive increases in food provision, fishery profits, and fish biomass in the sea. Our results suggest that a suite of approaches providing individual or communal access rights to fishery resources can align incentives across profit, food, and conservation so that few trade-offs will have to be made across these objectives in selecting effective policy interventions.

Abstract

Data from 4,713 fisheries worldwide, representing 78% of global reported fish catch, are analyzed to estimate the status, trends, and benefits of alternative approaches to recovering depleted fisheries. For each fishery, we estimate current biological status and forecast the impacts of contrasting management regimes on catch, profit, and biomass of fish in the sea. We estimate unique recovery targets and trajectories for each fishery, calculate the year-by-year effects of alternative recovery approaches, and model how alternative institutional reforms affect recovery outcomes. Current status is highly heterogeneous—the median fishery is in poor health (overfished, with further overfishing occurring), although 32% of fisheries are in good biological, although not necessarily economic, condition. Our business-as-usual scenario projects further divergence and continued collapse for many of the world’s fisheries. Applying sound management reforms to global fisheries in our dataset could generate annual increases exceeding 16 million metric tons (MMT) in catch, $53 billion in profit, and 619 MMT in biomass relative to business as usual. We also find that, with appropriate reforms, recovery can happen quickly, with the median fishery taking under 10 y to reach recovery targets. Our results show that commonsense reforms to fishery management would dramatically improve overall fish abundance while increasing food security and profits.

  • fishery recovery
  • fishery reform
  • rights-based fishery management
  • bioeconomic model

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: costello{at}bren.ucsb.edu.
  • Author contributions: C.C., C.K.S., R.H., M.C.M., T.A.B., S.D.G., C.S.S., D.N.R., and A.L. designed research; C.C., D.O., T.C., C.K.S., M.C.M., C.S.S., and R.B.C. performed research; D.O., T.C., R.H., M.C.M., C.S.S., R.B.C., and D.N.R. analyzed data; and C.C., S.D.G., R.B.C., D.N.R., and A.L. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

  • See Commentary on page 4895.

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1520420113/-/DCSupplemental.

Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.

View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Global fishery prospects under contrasting management regimes
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Global fishery prospects
Christopher Costello, Daniel Ovando, Tyler Clavelle, C. Kent Strauss, Ray Hilborn, Michael C. Melnychuk, Trevor A. Branch, Steven D. Gaines, Cody S. Szuwalski, Reniel B. Cabral, Douglas N. Rader, Amanda Leland
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences May 2016, 113 (18) 5125-5129; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1520420113

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Global fishery prospects
Christopher Costello, Daniel Ovando, Tyler Clavelle, C. Kent Strauss, Ray Hilborn, Michael C. Melnychuk, Trevor A. Branch, Steven D. Gaines, Cody S. Szuwalski, Reniel B. Cabral, Douglas N. Rader, Amanda Leland
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences May 2016, 113 (18) 5125-5129; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1520420113
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Article Classifications

  • Biological Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Social Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences

See related content:

  • Averting a global fisheries disaster
    - Apr 19, 2016
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 113 (18)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results and Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Indus River.
Lockdowns and snow melt in South Asia
Relatively clean snow and ice in the Indus River Basin during the COVID-19 pandemic may have reduced meltwater in 2020, compared with the 20-year average.
Image credit: Pixabay/Abdullah_Shakoor.
Water ice clouds on modern Mars.
Greenhouse warming of early Mars
Atmospheric and climate conditions could have created a cloud greenhouse effect to warm Mars and support liquid surface water.
Image credit: NASA/JPL/MSSS.
Researchers report a safety guideline to limit airborne transmission of COVID-19.
Risk of indoor aerosol transmission
Researchers report a safety guideline to limit airborne transmission of COVID-19 that goes beyond the six-foot social distancing guideline.
Image credit: Pixabay/Matryx.
Aerial view of modern wastewater treatment plants with aeration tanks and clarification tanks.
News Feature: Microbes for better sewage treatment
Going beyond conventional approaches, researchers are using carefully cultured bacterial communities to improve sewage treatment.
Image credit: Shutterstock/chekart.
Illustration of colorful carbon nanotube-like figure with a meadow at the center.
Opinion: We can use carbon to decarbonize—and get hydrogen for free
What if we stopped using oil and gas as fuels and instead use them as sources of both hydrogen for fuel and carbon for useful, pervasive materials?
Nanotube image credit: Shutterstock/Gl0ck; Field image credit: Shutterstock/Evgeny Karandaev.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Cozzarelli Prize
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490. PNAS is a partner of CHORUS, COPE, CrossRef, ORCID, and Research4Life.