Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology

Memories of unethical actions become obfuscated over time

Maryam Kouchaki and Francesca Gino
PNAS May 31, 2016 113 (22) 6166-6171; published ahead of print May 16, 2016 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1523586113
Maryam Kouchaki
aKellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: m-kouchaki@kellogg.northwestern.edu
Francesca Gino
bHarvard Business School, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02163
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  1. Edited by Susan T. Fiske, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, and approved April 19, 2016 (received for review November 29, 2015)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & SI

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. S1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. S1.

    Mean reported memory (AMQ) by cheating in study 2.

  • Fig. S2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. S2.

    Mean reported memory (AMQ) by condition in study 3.

  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Mean reported memory (AMQ) by condition in study 4. *P ≤ 0.05.

  • Fig. S3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. S3.

    The Boggle task used in study 7b: a copy of the screen participants saw in the instruction phase.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table S1.

    Means (SDs) of responses by condition in study 1a

    MeasuresUnethicalEthicalNegativePositiveNeutral
    Clarity5.38 (1.17)a6.00 (0.88)b5.90 (0.91)b5.99 (0.86)b5.98 (0.90)b
    Sensory3.07 (1.60)a3.53 (1.56)a,b3.14 (1.69)a3.53 (1.83)a,b3.83 (1.85)b
    Time context4.84 (1.29)a5.42 (1.32)b5.38 (1.41)b5.61 (1.30)b5.69 (1.22)b
    Spatial context5.53 (1.18)a5.91 (1.07)b5.70 (1.09)a,b5.97 (0.97)b,c6.17 (0.81)c
    Thoughts and feelings5.07 (1.07)a5.92 (1.02)b5.61 (0.97)c5.96 (0.85)b5.35 (1.16)a,c
    Intensity of feelings4.64 (1.39)a5.25 (1.30)b5.27 (1.44)b5.30 (1.37)b3.89 (1.55)c
    Timing7.86 (1.77)a7.86 (1.34)a7.73 (1.66)a7.51 (1.99)a2.54 (1.16)b
    Positive affect2.37 (0.92)a3.06 (0.97)b2.43 (0.77)a2.99 (0.85)b2.83 (0.84)b
    Negative affect1.73 (0.82)a1.25 (0.37)b1.73 (0.79)a1.31 (0.54)b1.31 (0.54)b
    Bad–good4.23 (1.69)a5.65 (1.37)b4.48 (1.64)a5.85 (1.27)b5.56 (1.29)b
    Sad–happy4.12 (1.71)a5.48 (1.57)b4.17 (1.63)a5.73 (1.28)b5.46 (1.40)b
    Tense–relaxed4.36 (1.84)a5.42 (1.61)b4.56 (1.66)a5.79 (1.32)b5.47 (1.57)b
    Negative–positive4.32 (1.67)a5.64 (1.40)b4.37 (1.60)a5.89 (1.30)b5.53 (1.43)b
    Uncomfortable–comfortable4.58 (1.77)a5.60 (1.38)b4.78 (1.71)a5.91 (1.20)b5.69 (1.39)b
    Distressed–satisfied4.33 (1.71)a5.57 (1.50)b4.39 (1.53)a5.60 (1.32)b5.03 (1.61)b
    Time spent on writing (in seconds)227.29 (137.43)a271.24 (178.81)a,b285.63 (178.55)b256.94 (156.08)a,b248.65 (159.09)a,b
    Number of words107.46 (61.14)a125.36 (75.31)a,b134.09 (81.49)b105.21 (59.70)a,c112.79 (68.05)a,b
    • Means not sharing subscripts within rows are significantly different at P < 0.05 based on Fisher’s least significant difference post hoc paired comparisons.

    • View popup
    Table S2.

    Means (SDs) of responses by condition in study 1b

    MeasuresUnethical-selfEthical-selfUnethical-otherEthical-other
    Clarity5.58 (1.19)a6.07 (0.81)b5.54 (1.11)a5.55 (1.13)a
    Sensory2.74 (1.38)a3.57 (1.46)b2.67 (1.29)a2.80 (1.43)a
    Time context5.66 (1.13)a6.08 (0.91)b5.44 (1.32)a,c5.38 (1.51)a,b
    Spatial context4.89 (1.75)a5.49 (1.34)b4.69 (1.61)a5.21 (1.47)a
    Thoughts and feelings5.49 (0.98)a5.93 (0.84)b5.38 (1.28)a5.24 (1.21)a
    Intensity of feelings5.02 (1.39)a5.27 (1.36)a5.02 (1.37)a4.55 (1.39)b
    Timing7.98 (1.73)a7.73 (1.64)a8.09 (1.37)a7.00 (1.77)b
    Positive affect2.37 (0.92)a3.06 (0.97)b2.59 (0.88)c2.87 (0.80)b
    Negative affect1.73 (0.82)a1.25 (0.37)b,c1.55 (0.73)b1.32 (0.52)c
    Bad–good3.84 (1.89)a5.66 (1.43)b4.68 (1.60)c5.60 (1.32)b
    Sad–happy3.66 (1.89)a5.49 (1.56)b4.29 (1.72)c5.36 (1.57)b
    Tense–relaxed4.13 (1.94)a5.42 (1.60)b4.59 (1.83)a5.34 (1.69)b
    Negative–positive3.87 (1.78)a5.73 (1.40)b4.34 (1.84)c5.72 (1.47)b
    Uncomfortable–comfortable3.93 (2.01)a5.51 (1.49)b4.72 (1.71)c5.51 (1.52)b
    Distressed–satisfied3.96 (1.86)a5.38 (1.62)b4.51 (1.67)c5.34 (1.45)b
    Time spent on writing (in seconds)368.35 (383.96)a326.59 (334.81)a337.20 (208.90)a300.64 (235.87)a
    Number of words143.13 (89.72)a126.17 (76.29)a,b135.13 (77.64)b110.11 (74.42)b
    • Means not sharing subscripts within rows are significantly different at the P < 0.05 based on Fisher’s least-significant difference post hoc paired comparisons.

Data supplements

  • Supporting Information

    • Download Supporting Information (PDF)
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Memories of unethical actions become obfuscated over time
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
Citation Tools
Leaving our immoral deeds in the past
Maryam Kouchaki, Francesca Gino
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences May 2016, 113 (22) 6166-6171; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1523586113

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Leaving our immoral deeds in the past
Maryam Kouchaki, Francesca Gino
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences May 2016, 113 (22) 6166-6171; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1523586113
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 116 (7)
Current Issue

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • SI Study 1a
    • SI Study 1b
    • SI Study 2
    • SI Study 3
    • SI Study 4
    • SI Study 5
    • SI Study 6
    • SI Study 7a
    • SI Study 7b
    • SI Scenario Pair A
    • SI Scenario Pair B
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Several aspects of the proposal, which aims to expand open access, require serious discussion and, in some cases, a rethink.
Opinion: “Plan S” falls short for society publishers—and for the researchers they serve
Several aspects of the proposal, which aims to expand open access, require serious discussion and, in some cases, a rethink.
Image credit: Dave Cutler (artist).
Several large or long-lived animals seem strangely resistant to developing cancer. Elucidating the reasons why could lead to promising cancer-fighting strategies in humans.
Core Concept: Solving Peto’s Paradox to better understand cancer
Several large or long-lived animals seem strangely resistant to developing cancer. Elucidating the reasons why could lead to promising cancer-fighting strategies in humans.
Image credit: Shutterstock.com/ronnybas frimages.
Featured Profile
PNAS Profile of NAS member and biochemist Hao Wu
 Nonmonogamous strawberry poison frog (Oophaga pumilio).  Image courtesy of Yusan Yang (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh).
Putative signature of monogamy
A study suggests a putative gene-expression hallmark common to monogamous male vertebrates of some species, namely cichlid fishes, dendrobatid frogs, passeroid songbirds, common voles, and deer mice, and identifies 24 candidate genes potentially associated with monogamy.
Image courtesy of Yusan Yang (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh).
Active lifestyles. Image courtesy of Pixabay/MabelAmber.
Meaningful life tied to healthy aging
Physical and social well-being in old age are linked to self-assessments of life worth, and a spectrum of behavioral, economic, health, and social variables may influence whether aging individuals believe they are leading meaningful lives.
Image courtesy of Pixabay/MabelAmber.

More Articles of This Classification

Social Sciences

  • Emergence of analogy from relation learning
  • Defining the economic scope for ecosystem-based fishery management
  • Social threat learning transfers to decision making in humans
Show more

Psychological and Cognitive Sciences

  • Emergence of analogy from relation learning
  • Social threat learning transfers to decision making in humans
  • Fighting misinformation on social media using crowdsourced judgments of news source quality
Show more

Related Content

  • No related articles found.
  • Scopus
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited by...

  • The Mixed Blessing of Leader Sense of Humor: Examining Costs and Benefits
  • Scopus (24)
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive

PNAS Portals

  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Teaching Resources
  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Site Map

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2019 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490