Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology
Research Article

Birds have primate-like numbers of neurons in the forebrain

Seweryn Olkowicz, Martin Kocourek, Radek K. Lučan, Michal Porteš, W. Tecumseh Fitch, Suzana Herculano-Houzel, and Pavel Němec
PNAS June 28, 2016 113 (26) 7255-7260; first published June 13, 2016; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1517131113
Seweryn Olkowicz
aDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, CZ-12844 Prague, Czech Republic;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin Kocourek
aDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, CZ-12844 Prague, Czech Republic;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Radek K. Lučan
aDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, CZ-12844 Prague, Czech Republic;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michal Porteš
aDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, CZ-12844 Prague, Czech Republic;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W. Tecumseh Fitch
bDepartment of Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Suzana Herculano-Houzel
cInstituto de Ciências Biomédicas, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, CEP 21941-902, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil;
dInstituto Nacional de Neurociência Translacional, Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia/Conselho Nacional de Pesquisas, CEP 04023-900, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pavel Němec
aDepartment of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, CZ-12844 Prague, Czech Republic;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: pgnemec@natur.cuni.cz
  1. Edited by Dale Purves, Duke University, Durham, NC, and approved May 6, 2016 (received for review August 27, 2015)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  1. Fig. S1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. S1.

    Phylogenetic relationships among the 28 species examined. The tree was constructed using birdtree.org/; its topology follows recent studies (46–49). Note that songbirds and parrots are sister groups and together with the distantly related barn owl belong to the clade core landbirds (Telluraves); the pigeon represents the Columbea, a basal clade of the Neoaves; the red junglefowl represents the Galloanseres, a sister group of Neoaves and the most basal clade of Neognathae; and the emu represents Paleognathae (tinamous and flightless ostriches), the most basal clade of extant birds (48). Also note that all passerine birds examined were vocal learners belonging to the clade Oscines.

  2. Fig. S2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. S2.

    Brain dissection and labeling of neurons and nonneuronal cells. (A and B) Brain of the raven before and after the dissection. (A) Ventral side of the brain showing approximate lines of dissection of the brainstem and tectum. (B) Brain dissected into parts used for isotropic fractionation. (C) NeuN-immunolabeled transverse section of the zebra finch brain depicting the line of dissection of the tectum from the rest of the mesencephalon. (D–F) Dissection of the telencephalon into pallium and subpallium. NeuN-immunolabeled transverse sections of the zebra finch brain at rostral (D), intermediate (E), and caudal (F) telencephalic levels. Lines of dissection follow the pallial-subpallial lamina and divide the telencephalon into pallium (dorsal part) and subpallium (ventral part). Coordinates anterior to the Y point are indicated in millimeters at Bottom Left (64). (G–I) High-power micrographs showing a sample of homogenate from the telencephalon of the Eurasian jay; dissociated nuclei stained with DAPI (G) and immunolabeled with NeuN antibody (H), dual-fluorescence merge image (I). Note that neurons are double-labeled, whereas the nonneuronal cells are devoid of anti-NeuN immunoreactivity. [Scale bars: 10 mm (A and B); 1 mm (C and F); 50 µm (I).]

  3. Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Cellular scaling rules for brains of songbirds and parrots compared with those for mammals. (A) Avian and mammalian brains depicted at the same scale. Numbers under each brain represent brain mass (in grams) and total number of brain neurons (in millions). Notice that brains of songbirds (goldcrest, starling, and rook) and parrots (cockatoo) contain more than twice as many neurons as rodent (mouse and rat) and primate (marmoset and galago) brains of similar size. (Scale bar: 10 mm.) (B) Brain mass plotted as a function of total number of neurons. Note that allometric lines for songbirds (green line) and parrots (red line) do not differ from each other, but they do differ from allometric lines for mammals (for statistics, see SI Results). (C) Brain mass plotted as a function of total number of nonneuronal cells. (D) Brain mass plotted as a function of body mass. (E) Total number of brain neurons plotted as a function of body mass. Allometric lines for the taxa examined are significantly different (for statistics, see SI Results). Each point represents the average values for one species. Data points representing noncorvid songbirds are light green, and data points representing corvid songbirds are dark green. The fitted lines represent reduced major axis (RMA) regressions and are shown only for correlations that are significant [coefficient of determination (r2) ranges between 0.831 and 0.997; P ≤ 0.021 in all cases]. Because nonneuronal scaling rules are very similar across the clades analyzed, the regression lines are omitted in C. Data for mammals are from published reports (for details, see Methods). CL, pigeon (Columba livia); DN, emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae); GG, red junglefowl (Gallus gallus); TA, barn owl (Tyto alba).

  4. Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Cellular densities in avian brains. (A) Lateral view of the starling brain showing the brain regions analyzed (for details, see SI Methods and Fig. S2). Neuronal (B and C) and nonneuronal cell density (D and E) plotted as a function of brain mass. Data points representing noncorvid songbirds are light green, and data points representing corvid songbirds are dark green. All graphs are plotted using the same y-axis scale for comparison. Note that neuronal density varies greatly among principal brain divisions and decreases significantly with increasing brain mass in all divisions but the telencephalon, whereas nonneuronal cell density is similar across brain divisions and species, but lower in the telencephalon (for statistics, see SI Results). The fitted lines represent RMA regressions and are shown only for correlations that are significant (r2 ranges between 0.410 and 0.962; P ≤ 0.030 in all cases).

  5. Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Neuronal densities and relative distribution of neurons in birds and mammals. (A–C) Neuronal densities in the pallium (A), cerebellum (B), and rest of the brain (C). Note that neuronal densities are higher in parrots and songbirds than in mammals (for statistics, see SI Results). (D–F) Average proportions of neurons contained in the pallium (D), cerebellum (E), and rest of the brain (F). Note that increasing proportions of brain neurons in the rest of the brain in parrots are attributable specifically to increasing numbers of neurons in the subpallium (Fig. 5). Data points representing noncorvid songbirds are light green, and data points representing corvid songbirds are dark green. The fitted lines represent RMA regressions and are shown only for correlations that are significant (r2 ranges between 0.389 and 0.956; P ≤ 0.033 in all cases). (G) Brains of corvids (jay and raven), parrots (macaw), and primates (monkeys) are drawn at the same scale. Numbers under each brain represent mass of the pallium (in grams) and total numbers of pallial/cortical neurons (in millions). Circular graphs show proportions of neurons contained in the pallium (green), cerebellum (red), and rest of the brain (yellow). Notice that brains of these highly intelligent birds harbor absolute numbers of neurons that are comparable, or even larger than those of primates with much larger brains. (Scale bar: 10 mm.) Data for mammals are from published reports (for details, see Methods). CL, pigeon; DN, emu; GG, red junglefowl; TA, barn owl.

  6. Fig. S3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. S3.

    Brain size, morphology, and number of neurons for the avian species examined. Dorsal and lateral views of representative brains are accompanied by information concerning total number of brain neurons (yellow), number of pallial neurons (blue), and brain mass (red). M, million. (Scale bar, 10 mm.)

  7. Fig. S4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. S4.

    Brain–body scaling in birds and mammals. (A and B) Taxonomic differences in relative brain size among songbirds (including both Oscines and Suboscines), parrots, primates, and nonprimate mammals. Inset in A corresponds to the magnified view shown in B. Note that allometric lines for these taxonomic groups are significantly different [full-factorial ANCOVA, slopes: F(3,2618) = 78.43, P < 10−6; intercepts: F(3,2618) = 7.44, P < 10−4; post hoc analyses indicate that the regression line for primates has a different slope (P < 0.001 for all pairwise comparisons) and that parrots and songbirds have significantly larger brains for a given body mass than nonprimate mammals (P < 10−6 for both planned comparisons)]. (C) Relative brain size differences among parrots, corvids, and noncorvid songbirds. Note that allometric lines for these taxonomic groups are significantly different [slopes: F(2,996) = 4.24, P = 0.014; intercepts: F(2,996) = 5.99, P = 0.003; post hoc analyses indicate the regression line for songbirds has a different slope (P ≤ 0.045 for both pairwise comparisons) and that parrots have significantly larger brains for a given body mass than corvids (P < 10−6)]. Mean brain mass versus mean body mass for species are plotted; the fitted lines represent reduced major axis regressions. The relationship between brain mass and body mass can be described by the following power functions: songbirds, MBR = 0.087 × MBO0.737, r2 = 0.953; noncorvid songbirds, MBR = 0.096 × MBO0.698, r2 = 0.92; corvids, MBR = 0.097 × MBO0.725, r2 = 0.952; parrots, MBR = 0.123 × MBO0.716, r2 = 0.954; primates, MBR = 0.061 × MBO0.823, r2 = 0.925; nonprimate mammals, MBR = 0.055 × MBO0.730, r2 = 0.977; all values of P < 0.0001. The data on body mass and brain mass were collated from the literature (for references, see Dataset S3); cetaceans were excluded from the dataset.

  8. Fig. S5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. S5.

    Quantitative data currently available for the avian and mammalian species examined with the isotropic fractionator. (A–D) Species ranked in descending order from the largest to the smallest body mass (A), brain mass (B), total number of brain neurons (C), and total number of pallial neurons (D). The mean values of these variables are given in brackets. (E) Median ranks for the avian and mammalian clades examined. Data for mammals are from published reports (32–39).

  9. Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Relative distribution of mass and cells in avian brains. Average percentages of mass (A and B), number of neurons (C and D), and number of nonneuronal cells (E and F) contained in the principal brain divisions relative to the whole brain in each species, plotted against brain mass. Data points representing noncorvid songbirds are light green, and data points representing corvid songbirds are dark green. The fitted lines represent RMA regressions and are shown only for correlations that are significant (r2 ranges between 0.389 and 0.956; P ≤ 0.023 in all cases). Note that both telencephalon mass fraction and proportions of neuronal and nonneuronal cells contained in the telencephalon increase with brain size.

  10. Fig. 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 5.

    Subpallium in avian telencephalon. (A) Diagram of sagittal section through the zebra finch brain showing relative position and size of the pallium and subpallium. (B and C) Average percentages of mass (B), number of neurons (C) contained in the subpallium relative to the whole telencephalon in each species, plotted against telencephalon mass. (D) Relationship between numbers of subpallial and pallial neurons. Note that, in parrots, the number of neurons in the subpallium increases faster than in the pallium (scaling exponent = 1.19 ± 0.13), whereas an opposite trend is observed in songbirds (scaling exponent = 0.91 ± 0.1). The fitted lines represent RMA regressions and are shown only for correlations that are significant (r2 ranges between 0.379 and 0.981; P ≤ 0.025 in all cases). Songbirds shown in green (data points representing noncorvids are light green, and data points representing corvids are dark green), parrots in red, and other birds in black. CL, pigeon; DN, emu; GG, red junglefowl; TA, barn owl.

  11. Fig. S6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. S6.

    Glia/neuron ratios for the avian species examined. Each point represents the average proportion of nonneuronal cells (left axis) and the glia/neuron ratio (right axis) for one species, plotted against the average brain mass for that species. Songbirds are shown in green, parrots in red, and other birds in black. (A) The overall glia/neuron ratio in the brain. Note the higher proportion of nonneuronal cells in all outgroup taxa. (B) Variation in the glia/neuron ratio among the principal brain divisions investigated. Note that nonneuronal cells constitute a minor cellular fraction in the telencephalon of all species except three representatives of basal bird lineages—the emu, the red junglefowl, and the pigeon. Also note the high proportion of nonneuronal cells in the brainstem and the diencephalon.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Emery NJ
    (2006) Cognitive ornithology: The evolution of avian intelligence. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 361(1465):23–43.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Emery NJ,
    2. Clayton NS
    (2004) The mentality of crows: Convergent evolution of intelligence in corvids and apes. Science 306(5703):1903–1907.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Clayton NS,
    2. Emery NJ
    (2015) Avian models for human cognitive neuroscience: A proposal. Neuron 86(6):1330–1342.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Weir AA,
    2. Chappell J,
    3. Kacelnik A
    (2002) Shaping of hooks in New Caledonian crows. Science 297(5583):981.
    .
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Auersperg AMI,
    2. Szabo B,
    3. von Bayern AMP,
    4. Kacelnik A
    (2012) Spontaneous innovation in tool manufacture and use in a Goffin’s cockatoo. Curr Biol 22(21):R903–R904.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Huber L,
    2. Gajdon GK
    (2006) Technical intelligence in animals: The kea model. Anim Cogn 9(4):295–305.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Taylor AH,
    2. Miller R,
    3. Gray RD
    (2012) New Caledonian crows reason about hidden causal agents. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(40):16389–16391.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Prior H,
    2. Schwarz A,
    3. Güntürkün O
    (2008) Mirror-induced behavior in the magpie (Pica pica): Evidence of self-recognition. PLoS Biol 6(8):e202.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Raby CR,
    2. Alexis DM,
    3. Dickinson A,
    4. Clayton NS
    (2007) Planning for the future by western scrub-jays. Nature 445(7130):919–921.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Emery NJ,
    2. Clayton NS
    (2001) Effects of experience and social context on prospective caching strategies by scrub jays. Nature 414(6862):443–446.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Bugnyar T,
    2. Schwab C,
    3. Schloegl C,
    4. Kotrschal K,
    5. Heinrich B
    (2007) Ravens judge competitors through experience with play caching. Curr Biol 17(20):1804–1808.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Jarvis ED
    (2004) Learned birdsong and the neurobiology of human language. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1016:749–777.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Pepperberg IM
    (1999) The Alex Studies: Cognitive and Communicative Abilities of Grey Parrots (Harvard Univ Press, Cambridge, MA).
    .
  14. ↵
    1. Jarvis ED, et al., Avian Brain Nomenclature Consortium
    (2005) Avian brains and a new understanding of vertebrate brain evolution. Nat Rev Neurosci 6(2):151–159.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Jarvis ED, et al.
    (2013) Global view of the functional molecular organization of the avian cerebrum: Mirror images and functional columns. J Comp Neurol 521(16):3614–3665.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Pfenning AR, et al.
    (2014) Convergent transcriptional specializations in the brains of humans and song-learning birds. Science 346(6215):1256846.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Shanahan M,
    2. Bingman VP,
    3. Shimizu T,
    4. Wild M,
    5. Güntürkün O
    (2013) Large-scale network organization in the avian forebrain: A connectivity matrix and theoretical analysis. Front Comput Neurosci 7:89.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Calabrese A,
    2. Woolley SM
    (2015) Coding principles of the canonical cortical microcircuit in the avian brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(11):3517–3522.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Kirsch JA,
    2. Güntürkün O,
    3. Rose J
    (2008) Insight without cortex: Lessons from the avian brain. Conscious Cogn 17(2):475–483.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Güntürkün O
    (2005) The avian “prefrontal cortex” and cognition. Curr Opin Neurobiol 15(6):686–693.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Veit L,
    2. Nieder A
    (2013) Abstract rule neurons in the endbrain support intelligent behaviour in corvid songbirds. Nat Commun 4:2878.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Striedter GF
    (2005) Principles of Brain Evolution (Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA).
    .
  23. ↵
    1. Roth G,
    2. Dicke U
    (2005) Evolution of the brain and intelligence. Trends Cogn Sci 9(5):250–257.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Herculano-Houzel S
    (2011) Brains matter, bodies maybe not: The case for examining neuron numbers irrespective of body size. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1225:191–199.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Dicke U,
    2. Roth G
    (2016) Neuronal factors determining high intelligence. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 371(1685):20150180.
    .
  26. ↵
    1. Deaner RO,
    2. Isler K,
    3. Burkart J,
    4. van Schaik C
    (2007) Overall brain size, and not encephalization quotient, best predicts cognitive ability across non-human primates. Brain Behav Evol 70(2):115–124.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. MacLean EL, et al.
    (2014) The evolution of self-control. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(20):E2140–E2148.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Stevens JR
    (2014) Evolutionary pressures on primate intertemporal choice. Proc Biol Sci 281(1786):20140499.
    .
  29. ↵
    1. Mlikovsky J
    (2003) Brain size and forearmen magnum area in crows and allies (Aves: Corvidae). Acta Soc Zool Bohem 67(1-4):203–211.
    .
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. Iwaniuk AN,
    2. Dean KM,
    3. Nelson JE
    (2005) Interspecific allometry of the brain and brain regions in parrots (Psittaciformes): Comparisons with other birds and primates. Brain Behav Evol 65(1):40–59.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Herculano-Houzel S,
    2. Manger PR,
    3. Kaas JH
    (2014) Brain scaling in mammalian evolution as a consequence of concerted and mosaic changes in numbers of neurons and average neuronal cell size. Front Neuroanat 8:77.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Herculano-Houzel S,
    2. Mota B,
    3. Lent R
    (2006) Cellular scaling rules for rodent brains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(32):12138–12143.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Herculano-Houzel S,
    2. Collins CE,
    3. Wong P,
    4. Kaas JH
    (2007) Cellular scaling rules for primate brains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104(9):3562–3567.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Sarko DK,
    2. Catania KC,
    3. Leitch DB,
    4. Kaas JH,
    5. Herculano-Houzel S
    (2009) Cellular scaling rules of insectivore brains. Front Neuroanat 3:8.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Neves K, et al.
    (2014) Cellular scaling rules for the brain of afrotherians. Front Neuroanat 8:5.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Kazu RS,
    2. Maldonado J,
    3. Mota B,
    4. Manger PR,
    5. Herculano-Houzel S
    (2014) Cellular scaling rules for the brain of Artiodactyla include a highly folded cortex with few neurons. Front Neuroanat 8:128.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Gabi M, et al.
    (2010) Cellular scaling rules for the brains of an extended number of primate species. Brain Behav Evol 76(1):32–44.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Azevedo FA, et al.
    (2009) Equal numbers of neuronal and nonneuronal cells make the human brain an isometrically scaled-up primate brain. J Comp Neurol 513(5):532–541.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Herculano-Houzel S, et al.
    (2011) Updated neuronal scaling rules for the brains of Glires (rodents/lagomorphs). Brain Behav Evol 78(4):302–314.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Herculano-Houzel S,
    2. Lent R
    (2005) Isotropic fractionator: A simple, rapid method for the quantification of total cell and neuron numbers in the brain. J Neurosci 25(10):2518–2521.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    1. Reiner A, et al., Avian Brain Nomenclature Forum
    (2004) Revised nomenclature for avian telencephalon and some related brainstem nuclei. J Comp Neurol 473(3):377–414.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Clark DA,
    2. Mitra PP,
    3. Wang SSH
    (2001) Scalable architecture in mammalian brains. Nature 411(6834):189–193.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Iwaniuk AN,
    2. Hurd PL
    (2005) The evolution of cerebrotypes in birds. Brain Behav Evol 65(4):215–230.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Reiner A,
    2. Medina L,
    3. Veenman CL
    (1998) Structural and functional evolution of the basal ganglia in vertebrates. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 28(3):235–285.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Chakraborty M, et al.
    (2015) Core and shell song systems unique to the parrot brain. PLoS One 10(6):e0118496.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Herculano-Houzel S
    (2014) The glia/neuron ratio: How it varies uniformly across brain structures and species and what that means for brain physiology and evolution. Glia 62(9):1377–1391.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Herculano-Houzel S
    (2009) The human brain in numbers: A linearly scaled-up primate brain. Front Hum Neurosci 3:31.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Hackett SJ, et al.
    (2008) A phylogenomic study of birds reveals their evolutionary history. Science 320(5884):1763–1768.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    1. Jetz W,
    2. Thomas GH,
    3. Joy JB,
    4. Hartmann K,
    5. Mooers AO
    (2012) The global diversity of birds in space and time. Nature 491(7424):444–448.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Jarvis ED, et al.
    (2014) Whole-genome analyses resolve early branches in the tree of life of modern birds. Science 346(6215):1320–1331.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    1. Prum RO, et al.
    (2015) A comprehensive phylogeny of birds (Aves) using targeted next-generation DNA sequencing. Nature 526(7574):569–573.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Lui JH,
    2. Hansen DV,
    3. Kriegstein AR
    (2011) Development and evolution of the human neocortex. Cell 146(1):18–36.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Charvet CJ,
    2. Striedter GF
    (2008) Developmental species differences in brain cell cycle rates between northern bobwhite quail (Colinus virginianus) and parakeets (Melopsittacus undulatus): Implications for mosaic brain evolution. Brain Behav Evol 72(4):295–306.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Charvet CJ,
    2. Striedter GF
    (2009) Developmental origins of mosaic brain evolution: Morphometric analysis of the developing zebra finch brain. J Comp Neurol 514(2):203–213.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Charvet CJ,
    2. Striedter GF
    (2011) Causes and consequences of expanded subventricular zones. Eur J Neurosci 34(6):988–993.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Charvet CJ,
    2. Striedter GF
    (2011) Developmental modes and developmental mechanisms can channel brain evolution. Front Neuroanat 5:4.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    1. Feenders G, et al.
    (2008) Molecular mapping of movement-associated areas in the avian brain: A motor theory for vocal learning origin. PLoS One 3(3):e1768.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Chakraborty M,
    2. Jarvis ED
    (2015) Brain evolution by brain pathway duplication. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 370(1684):20150056.
    .
  59. ↵
    1. Taylor MP,
    2. Wedel MJ
    (2013) Why sauropods had long necks; and why giraffes have short necks. PeerJ 1:e36.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    1. Peterson AT,
    2. Brisbin IL
    (1998) Genetic endangerment of wild red junglefowl Gallus gallus? Bird Conserv Int 8(04):387–394.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  61. ↵
    1. Mullen RJ,
    2. Buck CR,
    3. Smith AM
    (1992) NeuN, a neuronal specific nuclear protein in vertebrates. Development 116(1):201–211.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract
  62. ↵
    1. Mezey S, et al.
    (2012) Postnatal changes in the distribution and density of neuronal nuclei and doublecortin antigens in domestic chicks (Gallus domesticus). J Comp Neurol 520(1):100–116.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. ↵
    1. Bohonak AJ,
    2. van der Linde K
    (2004) RMA: Software for reduced major axis regression, Java version. Available at www.kimvdlinde.com/professional/rma.html. Accessed January 5, 2015.
    .
  64. ↵
    1. Nixdorf-Bergweiler B,
    2. Bischof H-J
    (2007) A Stereotaxic Atlas of the Brain of the Zebra Finch, Taeniopygia guttata, with Special Emphasis on Telencephalic Visual and Song System Nuclei in Transverse and Sagittal Sections (National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, MD). Available at www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2356/. Accessed March 3, 2016.
    .
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Birds have primate-like numbers of neurons in the forebrain
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Cellular scaling rules for bird brains
Seweryn Olkowicz, Martin Kocourek, Radek K. Lučan, Michal Porteš, W. Tecumseh Fitch, Suzana Herculano-Houzel, Pavel Němec
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Jun 2016, 113 (26) 7255-7260; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1517131113

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Cellular scaling rules for bird brains
Seweryn Olkowicz, Martin Kocourek, Radek K. Lučan, Michal Porteš, W. Tecumseh Fitch, Suzana Herculano-Houzel, Pavel Němec
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Jun 2016, 113 (26) 7255-7260; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1517131113
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 113 (26)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Article Classifications

  • Biological Sciences
  • Neuroscience

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Methods
    • SI Methods
    • SI Results
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Surgeons hands during surgery
Inner Workings: Advances in infectious disease treatment promise to expand the pool of donor organs
Despite myriad challenges, clinicians see room for progress.
Image credit: Shutterstock/David Tadevosian.
Setting sun over a sun-baked dirt landscape
Core Concept: Popular integrated assessment climate policy models have key caveats
Better explicating the strengths and shortcomings of these models will help refine projections and improve transparency in the years ahead.
Image credit: Witsawat.S.
Double helix
Journal Club: Noncoding DNA shown to underlie function, cause limb malformations
Using CRISPR, researchers showed that a region some used to label “junk DNA” has a major role in a rare genetic disorder.
Image credit: Nathan Devery.
Steamboat Geyser eruption.
Eruption of Steamboat Geyser
Mara Reed and Michael Manga explore why Yellowstone's Steamboat Geyser resumed erupting in 2018.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Multi-color molecular model
Enzymatic breakdown of PET plastic
A study demonstrates how two enzymes—MHETase and PETase—work synergistically to depolymerize the plastic pollutant PET.
Image credit: Aaron McGeehan (artist).

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490