Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology
Letter

Linear controls are not enough to account for multiplicative confound effects on air rage

Roger Giner-Sorolla
PNAS July 19, 2016 113 (29) E4119; first published July 12, 2016; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1607914113
Roger Giner-Sorolla
aSchool of Psychology, Keynes College, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent CT27NP, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: rsg@kent.ac.uk

This Letter has a Reply and related content. Please see:

  • Reply to Giner-Sorolla: Relationships between inequality and air rage are robust to additional specifications - July 12, 2016
  • Physical and situational inequality on airplanes predicts air rage - May 02, 2016
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Regarding the recent publication in PNAS of an article on predictors of air rage (1), I am concerned that the main regression analyses did not control sufficiently for the two highly correlated factors of number of seats and length of flight.

The dependent variable analyzed, raw incidence of air rage per flight, is naturally confounded by the number of passengers, modeled in this analysis by number of seats, times the length of the flight, modeled by miles. The authors controlled for both main effects, but not for the product (i.e., interaction), of these two factors. Effectively, they controlled for number of seats, and additionally for the fraction of variance in flight time not accounted for by the high correlation with number of seats. This method does not control enough for the mere opportunity for person-level events during a flight, which depends on the full product of those two factors.

All things being equal, this analysis would overestimate the positive impact of factors positively correlated with seats/flight length (e.g., presence of first class on a flight in model 1) and underestimate the positive impact of factors negatively correlated with seats/flight length (e.g., the front boarding factor in model 2).

It would be also desirable to control for quadratic effects of each term on top of the interaction (i.e., the length2 × seats and seats2 × length terms.) These products would control for differences in incidents due to incremental effects of time and flight size per person-hour. For example, the length2 × seats factor models whether there is more air rage on longer flights, apart from the mere fact that they have more passengers and more time for a random event to emerge. This factor would represent possible effects of fatigue or environmental frustration on longer flights, effects that might be expected and would also confound the effects of the focal variables.

My suggestion is for the authors to repeat all their basic and robust logistic regression models, but to calculate and include the following additional predictor effects simultaneously with or before the predictor variables of interest (i.e., presence of first class, front boarding):

  • Seats × flight length interaction

  • Seats2 × flight length interaction

  • Seats × flight length2 interaction

Additionally, it would be useful to know the zero-order effects of the variables of interest upon incidents, controlling only for seats, flight length, and their interaction. Zero-order effects would help determine whether the overall effect of other factors is to suppress or facilitate the focal effects.

I have every expectation that these authors will be interested in making sure that the analyses in their articles are correct and will cooperate in providing any analyses of their dataset required in their reply.

Footnotes

  • ↵1Email: rsg{at}kent.ac.uk.
  • Author contributions: R.G.-S. wrote the paper.

  • The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. ↵
    1. DeCelles KA,
    2. Norton MI
    (2016) Physical and situational inequality on airplanes predicts air rage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113(20):5588–5591.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Linear controls are not enough to account for multiplicative confound effects on air rage
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Multiplicative effects on air rage
Roger Giner-Sorolla
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Jul 2016, 113 (29) E4119; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1607914113

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Multiplicative effects on air rage
Roger Giner-Sorolla
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Jul 2016, 113 (29) E4119; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1607914113
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 113 (29)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Article Classifications

  • Social Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Illustration of scientists adding bricks to a wall
Opinion: There’s a better way to address reproducibility and replicability
Scientists should pursue a strategic approach to research, focusing on the accumulation of evidence via designed sequences of studies.
Image credit: Dave Cutler (artist).
Surgeons hands during surgery
Inner Workings: Advances in infectious disease treatment promise to expand the pool of donor organs
Despite myriad challenges, clinicians see room for progress.
Image credit: Shutterstock/David Tadevosian.
Microscopic view of salmonella bacteria
Journal Club: Host defenses signal Salmonella to hijack immune cells, spur disease
Sneaky intracellular bacteria know when to defend themselves and multiply.
Image credit: Camilla Ciolli Mattioli.
Steamboat Geyser eruption.
Eruption of Steamboat Geyser
Mara Reed and Michael Manga explore why Yellowstone's Steamboat Geyser resumed erupting in 2018.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Multi-color molecular model
Enzymatic breakdown of PET plastic
A study demonstrates how two enzymes—MHETase and PETase—work synergistically to depolymerize the plastic pollutant PET.
Image credit: Aaron McGeehan (artist).

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490