Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
Research Article

From fire whirls to blue whirls and combustion with reduced pollution

Huahua Xiao, View ORCID ProfileMichael J. Gollner, and Elaine S. Oran
  1. aDepartment of Aerospace Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742;
  2. bDepartment of Fire Protection Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS August 23, 2016 113 (34) 9457-9462; first published August 4, 2016; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1605860113
Huahua Xiao
aDepartment of Aerospace Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: hhxiao@umd.edu
Michael J. Gollner
bDepartment of Fire Protection Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Michael J. Gollner
Elaine S. Oran
aDepartment of Aerospace Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  1. Edited by Guillermo Rein, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom, and accepted by Editorial Board Member Robert E. Dickinson June 27, 2016 (received for review April 11, 2016)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Significance

The growing worldwide demand to reduce emissions from combustion calls for development of alternative technologies for high-efficiency and low-emission combustion. Whereas fire whirls are known for their intense and disastrous threat to life and surrounding environments, their swirl properties and thus higher combustion efficiency imply an unexploited potential for highly efficient, low-emission combustion. In studying fire whirls over water for oil-spill cleanup, we discovered a beautiful, swirling flame phenomenon, the “blue whirl,” which evolves from a fire whirl and burns with nearly soot-free combustion. Understanding and control of the blue whirl and its predecessor, the fire whirl, will suggest new ways for fuel-spill remediation, reduced-pollution combustion, and fluid mechanics research.

Abstract

Fire whirls are powerful, spinning disasters for people and surroundings when they occur in large urban and wildland fires. Whereas fire whirls have been studied for fire-safety applications, previous research has yet to harness their potential burning efficiency for enhanced combustion. This article presents laboratory studies of fire whirls initiated as pool fires, but where the fuel sits on a water surface, suggesting the idea of exploiting the high efficiency of fire whirls for oil-spill remediation. We show the transition from a pool fire, to a fire whirl, and then to a previously unobserved state, a “blue whirl.” A blue whirl is smaller, very stable, and burns completely blue as a hydrocarbon flame, indicating soot-free burning. The combination of fast mixing, intense swirl, and the water–surface boundary creates the conditions leading to nearly soot-free combustion. With the worldwide need to reduce emissions from both wanted and unwanted combustion, discovery of this state points to possible new pathways for reduced-emission combustion and fuel-spill cleanup. Because current methods to generate a stable vortex are difficult, we also propose that the blue whirl may serve as a research platform for fundamental studies of vortices and vortex breakdown in fluid mechanics.

  • fire whirl
  • blue whirl
  • vortex breakdown
  • combustion
  • soot free

Fire tornadoes, fire devils, and fire twisters are popular and terrifying common names for fire whirls. These intense swirling fires arise spontaneously with the “right” combination of wind and fire. On the large scale, they appear very similar to atmospheric phenomena such as tornadoes and dust devils (1⇓⇓–4). Fire whirls form in large urban and wildland fires when winds interact with obstacles or natural features in the terrain (2, 4⇓–6) and produce large vortices that intensify as they interact with a local fire. When fire whirls arise naturally in large fires, they present a strong, essentially uncontrollable threat to life, property, and surrounding environments. Due to the strong vertical winds they generate, they can lift and toss burning debris, which can then travel kilometers to spread the fire (5, 7).

A pool fire is a diffusion flame that burns above a horizontal pool of vaporizing hydrocarbon fuel. Pool fires can occur on any flat surface on which fuel is spread, including in situ burning of oil spills (8). Fire whirls can evolve from relatively small fires under proper wind or topographic conditions (1, 2, 5⇓–7, 9). Smaller-scale laboratory experiments have shown that a relatively quiescent pool fire may transform into a fire whirl (2, 7, 10⇓⇓⇓–14), and that the temperature and burning efficiency are higher than those of the initial fire (2, 10, 15). This transition occurs through a pattern of events in which the fire first leans to one side, begins to rotate, and then stretches upward (lengthens) before eventually becoming a fire whirl (7, 10, 14). Flame heights from wildfires, pool fires, and fire whirls range from centimeters to kilometers (1, 12, 14, 16, 17). Smaller-scale experiments may be performed in laboratories so that their properties and behaviors can be studied (2, 4, 6, 7, 13, 18, 19).

Blue Fire Whirl over Water

For the purpose of improving fuel-spill remediation, we began a study of swirling flames ignited and burning on water, as opposed to the usual solid ground. A major, obvious difference between this and prior studies of pool fires and fire whirls on solid surfaces is the physical complexity of the boundary layer between the water, evaporating fuel, and flame. Fig. 1 shows the three states of burning that we observe on water. Fig. 1 A and B shows the usual pool fire and fire whirl, respectively, created here when winds enter the chamber tangentially. Fig. 1C shows the blue whirl, which evolves from the yellow fire whirl and is shown and discussed here.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Evolution from a pool fire to a blue whirl over water in a swirl generator. (A) Pool fire forms following ignition. (B) Canonical fire whirl develops subsequent to the pool fire. (C) Previously unobserved laminar blue whirl evolves from the yellow fire whirl. The vertical scale marked on the side of each image starts at the water surface.

The experimental setup consists of two half-cylinders and a cylindrical stainless steel pan full of water. A liquid fuel, n-heptane, is poured on the surface of quiescent water at the center of the pan and is then ignited by a small igniter. The two quartz half-cylinders are suspended over the pan. Offsetting the half-cylinders creates two vertical slits that allow air to be entrained tangentially to the flame region, a method often used to create fire whirls for laboratory study (18). To sustain the blue whirl for further observation and study, we introduced a small copper tube under the water to pump heptane to the center region of the water surface at a fixed flow rate. When the fuel injection rate was set between 0.8 and 1.2 mL/min, and the size of the vertical gaps was 1.8–3.0 cm, the blue whirl could be sustained as long as fuel was supplied. (The longest time sustained was just under 8 min, the time when the pump was stopped.) When the fuel supply was cut off, the blue whirl died out quietly as a blue whirl with ever-decreasing size, all of which indicates that it could, in theory, be sustained for longer times if fuel were made available.

After ignition, a small, chaotic pool fire forms (Fig. 1A). As cold entrained air is drawn into the chamber, the fire creates a strong vertical flow. Initially, the pool fire tilts and meanders (Movie S1), as reported previously (7, 10, 14), but then a canonical fire whirl, over 60 cm high, forms at the center of the apparatus (Fig. 1B). As with fire whirls on solid surfaces, this fire whirl on water burns much more vigorously than the initial pool fire. The vortex motions are strong, the fire whirl is taller, and the temperature is higher than in a pool fire. Then, unexpectedly, the fire whirl continues to evolve to a different, unexpected fire structure (Fig. 1C): a small, intensely whirling blue flame (Movies S1 and S2).

Whereas the pool fire and the fire whirl are turbulent, the blue whirl shows no visible or aural signs of turbulence. A stable blue whirl is very quiet. The rotation was generally clockwise, consistent with the direction of air inflow from the gaps in the apparatus. Throughout its lifetime, the blue whirl generally revolves clockwise in the center region of the container at an angular speed within 6.3 rad/s.

Structure of the Blue Whirl

Fig. 2 shows a front view of the structure of a blue whirl. This structure consists of two main regions: the bright-blue spinning flame at the base and a faint conical violet flame sitting above and (possibly) partly in the central cup. The lower blue region appears more stable and ∼2 cm high. The height of the visible violet region varies from 2 to 6 cm. Thus, the total height of the blue whirl was 4–8 cm, much shorter than the yellow fire whirl (over 60 cm) or pool fire (typically around 25 cm for this system). Near the fuel surface, the blue whirl tapers to a small rounded bottom. Above the bottom point, the blue whirl spreads out as it moves upward and resembles a spinning top. There is often a gap between the water and the bottom of the blue whirl. The top of the blue whirl ends sharply, although there is a hazy violet flame above it. At the end of burning, the blue whirl decreases in height and diameter and dies out calmly and smoothly (Movie S1). Attempts to relight residual fuel that might be on the water surface do not produce any flames.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Front view of structure of a blue whirl generated over water. The structure mainly consists of a blue region and a violet region. A reflection of the blue whirl in the water can be seen in the lower part of the image.

Transitions Between Yellow and Blue Whirls

Once the yellow fire whirl has formed and burned for a time, it evolves into a transitional state with a diameter and height that fluctuate, but generally decrease (Movie S1). Eventually it forms a smaller “transitional whirl,” which appears unstable and “dances around” on the surface. There is a blue section at the base and a yellow flame that seems to grow out of this base, so that the blue whirl looks like a cup holding a yellow flame. A photograph of this transition state is shown in Fig. 3. After this, the yellow flame dies out, leaving only a blue whirl.

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Transitioning whirl during the evolution process from a yellow fire whirl to a blue whirl. The height of this structure is about 15 cm. A cup-like blue whirling flame on water holds a yellow whirling flame.

During the lifetime of the blue whirl, it transitions several times from the short-lived transitional whirl and then back to the more stable blue whirl (Fig. 4 and Movies S1 and S2). In the transition process, the upper region is replaced by a yellow flame, as shown in Fig. 4 C–O. Then, a blue cup forms again and holds the yellow flame in its center (Fig. 4 P and Q). Subsequently, the yellow flame spirally shrinks in the blue cup and disappears in the center region of the blue whirl (Fig. 4 R–Y), leaving a fully recovered blue whirl. As this is happening, a yellow spiral flame is enclosed in an envelope composed of a blue whirl and a secondary violet, conical flame (Fig. 4 R–V).

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Successive frames showing transition between a laminar blue whirl and a yellow whirl taken from a high-speed video. (A) Blue whirl. (B) Collapse of the blue whirl just before it transitions to a yellow fire. (C–O) Transitional yellow fire with a blue base. (P–X) Transitional blue whirl holding a yellow whirl in its center. (Y) Fully recovered blue whirl. The entire transition (blue whirl → yellow whirl → blue whirl) takes approximately 2 s. Inside the yellow center of the blue whirl, there appears to be a rotational core that fades as the whirl becomes stabilized over the fuel and a steady regime commences (R–U).

Understanding the Physics of the Blue Whirl

Vortex-breakdown phenomena, which have been studied extensively in fluid dynamics [see, e.g., reviews in refs. 20⇓–22 and underpinning studies, such as by Taylor (23)], can be defined as a collection of properties and dynamics of a column of fluid (gas or liquid) subjected to various swirl intensities. These studies focus especially on metastable states that evolve as a result of the formation of stagnation points and recirculation regions. These phenomena are often studied confined in tubes in the laboratory, as well as by theory and simulations (e.g., refs. 20⇓–22); however, they have also appeared naturally in unconfined scenarios, such as tornadoes (24). Two of the most important states of vortex breakdown are the spiral and the bubble modes. As the swirl strength in the spiral mode increases, there may be a transition to a bubble mode, and there may also be transitions back and forth occurring among modes. Vortex breakdown is fundamental to swirl combustion, a spiral mode that operates so efficiently because of turbulent mixing and the recirculation zones that result in the increased residence times required for favorable combustion properties (25⇓–27).

The fluid-dynamic starting point for understanding the blue whirl is to make a visually based, as yet qualitative analogy. Fire whirls appear to be versions of a spiral mode. The lower blue region of the blue whirl appears to be the lower portion of a bubble mode, with the upper portion of the bubble completed by the blue whirl’s purple cap. Such a configuration occurring naturally with combustion, to the best knowledge of the authors, has not been observed before. The blue whirl also has a shape similar to that seen in tornadoes (24), and so it may correspond to a reactive bubble mode. We therefore postulate that the blue-whirl bubble evolves when the traditional yellow fire whirl, existing in a spiral-like mode, intensifies naturally. This is a starting point for explaining some of the transition process observed (Fig. 4).

The yellow color of hydrocarbon diffusion flames, such as pool fires or fire whirls, is due to blackbody emissions by radiating soot particles. Soot forms when there is not enough oxygen present to burn the fuel completely. The blue and violet colors are due to chemiluminescence of excited species such as C2, CH, and OH radicals (28, 29). Blue in the whirl indicates that there is enough oxygen present for complete combustion, and therefore suggests a premixed flame. Previous work has shown that fast mixing, which occurs in certain coflowing or opposed-jet diffusion flames, can create soot-free, blue flames (30⇓–32). The explanation was that the fluid dynamics around the flame helped limit soot precursors and soot in fuel-rich regions, so that complete oxidation occurred in fuel-lean regions (31⇓–33). Similar processes occurring in recirculation zones inside the blue whirl could limit the soot formation here.

Furthermore, we speculate that the boundary conditions, that is, the existence of an air–water–fuel boundary layer instead of a fuel–air boundary on a solid surface, plays an important role for the transition to a blue whirl. For a fire whirl on a solid surface, there is a flame vortex tube that ends on the solid surface. On water, the flame appears to sit above the surface and even generates vortical motions in and on the water. There is likely to be a layer of evaporated fuel between the bottom of the blue whirl and the water, possibly creating a premixed region at the base. On the other hand, flow rotation intensifies air entrainment and causes strong inflow of air near the boundary layer in vortex phenomena (2, 3, 7, 10), which could allow reactants to mix quickly above the fuel surface. This would have the general form of a triple flame (34), a small premixed flame connected to a diffusion flame. This may also result in higher temperatures and thus increased burning efficiencies.

Fuel rotation induced by the spinning helps the blue whirl stay centered in the tank. The strong rotation lowers the pressure in the center of the vortex, thus keeping the fuel slick from spreading as it does in pool fires. This helps the blue whirl to burn for extended periods, sometimes removing any visible residual fuel slick. This may be useful for in situ burning, because an oil slick must be maintained with a critical thickness or the fire will burn out (35).

In conclusion, experiments have discovered a flame phenomenon, the blue whirl, which shows a distinct flame structure and reduced soot emissions compared with both traditional pool fires and fire whirls. These changes are thought to occur through a combination of a vortex breakdown transition, in which the flow transitions from a spiral to a bubble mode, and by fast mixing, which limits soot formation in the vortex and creates regions of premixed fuel and oxidizer. Many questions still remain, such as why has this blue whirl not been seen before, what really are the physical and chemical processes controlling the formation of the blue whirl, can this configuration be used for energy production, and can we generate blue whirls at larger scales? Further understanding of the complex, multiphase physics occurring during blue-whirl combustion offers exciting possibilities for the future, and may therefore lead to the development of novel methods for fuel-spill remediation and high-efficiency combustion.

Materials and Methods

The experimental setup is shown in Fig. 5. The experiment was performed on top of a round steel pan filled with water, with a 40-cm inner diameter and 3.2 cm in height. The water surface was flush with the edge of the water pan. Two quartz half-cylinders (30 cm in diameter and 60 cm in height) were suspended about 2 mm over the water surface (Note that the blue whirl can form when the bottoms of the half-cylinders fully or partly touch the water surface.) The ambient pressure and temperature in the experiments were 1 atm and 298 K, respectively. The liquid fuel used was 99.4% pure liquid n-heptane. Initially, the water was quiescent and 2.5 mL heptane was squirted from a syringe onto the center region of the water surface. Shortly thereafter, the heptane was ignited by a small igniter filled with butane (Olympian GM-3X) which was removed immediately after ignition. The gap size between the half-cylinders and the initial amount of liquid n-heptane poured on the water was initially varied, but the observations reported here were all taken at 1.8 cm and 2.5 mL, respectively.

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Experimental design of the fire whirl generator over water. The copper fuel pump tube, which is connected to a syringe pump, is removable.

To sustain the blue whirl for extended observation, a syringe (BD 60-mL syringe) was first filled with heptane and then injected slowly to the center region of the water surface through a copper tube (external and internal diameters 0.3 and 0.1 cm, respectively). The copper tube was extended along the bottom of the water pan to the center and bent vertically upward until its opening was about 3 mm below the water surface. A small needle was projected out of the tube opening with its tip just under the water surface to prevent bubble formation when feeding heptane. The copper tube was connected to the syringe using a rubber tube outside the water pan. Injection of fuel was controlled by a syringe pump (Harvard Apparatus Pump 11 Elite) that continually supplied heptane at a constant rate (1.1 mL/min in this study).

Changing the exterior shape of the confining apparatus does not seem to affect whether or not fire whirls or blue whirls can form. Experiments in a four-sided square polymethyl methacrylate apparatus produced a fire whirl evolving into a blue whirl. The gap size of the slits between the two half-cylinders, however, does affect the formation and stability of both the blue and traditional fire whirls. Ultimately, a two-gap configuration with a cylindrical shape was chosen for the study in the belief that the cylindrical shape would allow the blue whirl to form and remain stable in the center region of the apparatus. An important point to make is that the blue whirl formed not only when n-heptane was the fuel, but also formed with heavier hydrocarbons, such as crude oil.

The evolution of the fire and fire whirls was recorded using a Canon EOS 70D digital single-lens reflex camera. The images in Fig. 1 A and B were taken using a Tv mode with manual focusing and automatic ISO sensitivity. The images in Figs. 1C, 2, and 3 were taken using Scene mode with manual focusing. The images taken by the camera in Figs. 1–3 were acquired with a pixel resolution of 3,648 × 3,432 and bit depth of 24. The movie from which Fig. 4 was extracted, and Movies S1 and S2 were taken at a frame rate of 50 frames per second with a pixel resolution of 1,280 × 720.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Ajay Singh, Evan Sluder, and Sriram Bharath Hariharan for their assistance in laboratory experiments. They also acknowledge Alexander Smits, Forman A. Williams, Ajay Singh, and Larry Li for fruitful discussions. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation through Early-Concept Grants for Exploratory Research (EAGER) Award CBET-1507623 and by the University of Maryland through Minta Martin Endowment Funds in the Department of Aerospace Engineering and the Glenn L. Martin Institute Chaired Professorship at the A. James Clark School of Engineering.

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: hhxiao{at}umd.edu.
  • Author contributions: H.X., M.J.G., and E.S.O. designed research, performed research, analyzed data, and wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. G.R. is a Guest Editor invited by the Editorial Board.

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1605860113/-/DCSupplemental.

Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Dessens J
    (1962) Man-made tornadoes. Nature 193(4810):13–14.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. ↵
    1. Emmons HW,
    2. Ying S-J
    (1967) The fire whirl. Symp (Int) Combust 11(1):475–488.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. ↵
    1. Logan SE
    (1971) An approach to the dust devil vortex. AIAA J 9(4):660–665.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    1. Kuwana K, et al.
    (2007) Can we predict the occurrence of extreme fire whirls? AIAA J 45(1):16–19.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. ↵
    1. Forthofer JM,
    2. Goodrick SL
    (2011) Review of vortices in wildland fire. J Combust 2011:984363.
    .
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Kuwana K,
    2. Sekimoto K,
    3. Saito K,
    4. Williams FA
    (2008) Scaling fire whirls. Fire Saf J 43(4):252–257.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    1. Byram GM,
    2. Martin RE
    (1970) The modeling of fire whirlwinds. For Sci 16(4):386–399.
    .
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Buist I,
    2. McCourt J,
    3. Potter S,
    4. Ross S,
    5. Trudel K
    (1999) In situ burning. Pure Appl Chem 71(1):43–65.
    .
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Zhou R,
    2. Wu ZN
    (2007) Fire whirls due to surrounding flame sources and the influence of the rotation speed on the flame height. J Fluid Mech 583:313–345.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    1. Snegirev AY,
    2. Marsden JA,
    3. Francis J,
    4. Makhviladze GM
    (2004) Numerical studies and experimental observations of whirling flames. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 47(12-13):2523–2539.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. ↵
    1. Chuah KH,
    2. Kushida G
    (2007) The prediction of flame heights and flame shapes of small fire whirls. Proc Combust Inst 31(2):2599–2606.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    1. Chuah KH,
    2. Kuwana K,
    3. Saito K
    (2009) Modeling a fire whirl generated over a 5-cm-diameter methanol pool fire. Combust Flame 156(9):1828–1833.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. ↵
    1. Kuwana K,
    2. Sekimoto K,
    3. Minami T,
    4. Tashiro T,
    5. Saito K
    (2013) Scale-model experiments of moving fire whirl over a line fire. Proc Combust Inst 34(2):2625–2631.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. ↵
    1. Lei J,
    2. Liu N
    (2016) Reciprocal transitions between buoyant diffusion flame and fire whirl. Combust Flame 167:463–471.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. ↵
    1. Lei J, et al.
    (2011) Experimental research on combustion dynamics of medium-scale fire whirl. Proc Combust Inst 33(2):2407–2415.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. ↵
    1. Goens DW
    (1978) Fire whirls. NOAA Technical Memorandum NWS WR-129, Missoula, Montana.
    .
  17. ↵
    1. Finney MA, et al.
    (2015) Role of buoyant flame dynamics in wildfire spread. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(32):9833–9838.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Hartl KA,
    2. Smits AJ
    (2016) Scaling of a small scale burner fire whirl. Combust Flame 163:202–208.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. ↵
    1. Soma S,
    2. Saito K
    (1991) Reconstruction of fire whirls using scale models. Combust Flame 86(3):269–284.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. ↵
    1. Leibovich S
    (1978) The structure of vortex breakdown. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 10:221–246.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. ↵
    1. Lugt HJ
    (1989) Vortex breakdown in atmospheric columnar vortices. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 70(12):1526–1537.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. ↵
    1. Lucca-Negro O,
    2. O’Doherty T
    (2001) Vortex breakdown: A review. Prog Energy Combust Sci 27(4):431–481.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  23. ↵
    1. Taylor GI
    (1922) The motion of a sphere in a rotating liquid. Proc R Soc Lond, A Contain Pap Math Phys Character 102(715):180–189.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  24. ↵
    1. Pauley RL,
    2. Snow JT
    (1988) On the kinematics and dynamics of the 18 July 1986 Minneapolis tornado. Mon Weather Rev 116(12):2731–2736.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. ↵
    1. Fritz J,
    2. Kroner M,
    3. Sattelmayer T
    (2004) Flashback in a swirl burner with cylindrical premixing zone. J Eng Gas Turbines Power 126(2):276–283.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  26. ↵
    1. Choi JJ,
    2. Rusak Z,
    3. Kapila AK
    (2007) Numerical simulation of premixed chemical reactions with swirl. Combust Theory Model 11(6):863–887.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  27. ↵
    1. Kroner M,
    2. Sattelmayer T,
    3. Fritz J,
    4. Kiesewetter F,
    5. Hirsch C
    (2007) Flame propagation in swirling flows - Effect of local extinction on the combustion induced vortex breakdown. Combust Sci Technol 179(7):1385–1416.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. ↵
    1. Kuo KK
    (2005) Principles of Combustion (John Wiley & Sons, New York), 2nd Ed, pp 437–442.
    .
  29. ↵
    1. Turns SR
    (2012) An Introduction to Combustion: Concepts and Applications (McGraw-Hill, New York), 3rd Ed, pp 258–261.
    .
  30. ↵
    1. Glassman I
    (1989) Soot formation in combustion processes. Symp (Int) Combust 22(1):295–311.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. ↵
    1. Lin KC,
    2. Faeth GM
    (1996) Hydrodynamic suppression of soot emissions in laminar diffusion flames. J Propuls Power 12(1):10–17.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. ↵
    1. Lin KC,
    2. Faeth GM
    (1996) Effects of hydrodynamics on soot formation in laminar opposed-jet diffusion flames. J Propuls Power 12(4):691–698.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. ↵
    1. Du J,
    2. Axelbaum RL
    (1995) The effect of flame structure on soot-particle inception in-diffusion flames. Combust Flame 100(3):367–375.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. ↵
    1. Kioni PN,
    2. Rogg B,
    3. Bray KNC,
    4. Linan A
    (1993) Flame spread in laminar mixing layers: The triple flame. Combust Flame 95(3):276–290.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  35. ↵
    1. Torero JL,
    2. Olenick SM,
    3. Garo JP,
    4. Vantelon JP
    (2003) Determination of the burning characteristics of a slick of oil on water. Spill Sci Technol Bull 8(4):379–390.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
From fire whirls to blue whirls and combustion with reduced pollution
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
From fire whirls to blue whirls
Huahua Xiao, Michael J. Gollner, Elaine S. Oran
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Aug 2016, 113 (34) 9457-9462; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1605860113

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
From fire whirls to blue whirls
Huahua Xiao, Michael J. Gollner, Elaine S. Oran
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Aug 2016, 113 (34) 9457-9462; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1605860113
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Article Classifications

  • Physical Sciences
  • Engineering
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 113 (34)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Blue Fire Whirl over Water
    • Structure of the Blue Whirl
    • Transitions Between Yellow and Blue Whirls
    • Understanding the Physics of the Blue Whirl
    • Materials and Methods
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

A purple sea urchin barren interspersed with patches of giant kelp in Monterey Bay, California.
Predator and prey behavior in Pacific kelp forests
Reduction in kelp forests altered sea otter and sea urchin behavior, restructuring mechanisms of ecosystem control.
Image credit: Michael Langhans (photographer).
Bat.
Interactive tool ranks viruses at risk of spillover
SpillOver, a web application that ranks wildlife-origin viruses based on their risk of spreading to humans.
Image credit: Pixabay/dustinthewind.
Scarlet macaw recovered from Pica 8.
Parrot-rearing in pre-Columbian Atacama Desert
Amazonian parrots imported to Atacama Desert communities were raised for colorful feathers.
Image credit: Calogero M. Santoro and José M. Capriles.
Severn river near Annapolis, MD viewed from above.
News Feature: The complex case of Chesapeake Bay restoration
Amid encouraging signs, researchers and activists are struggling to make progress in the face of agricultural inputs, climate change, and relentless development.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Ladinn.
A crowd gathers, many taking photos with their cell phones.
Journal Club: Harmful social behaviors are the toughest to shift
Using a series of simple video games, cognitive neuroscientists showed that some norms are easier to change than others.
Image credit: Shutterstock/qwret.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Cozzarelli Prize
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490. PNAS is a partner of CHORUS, COPE, CrossRef, ORCID, and Research4Life.