Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
Commentary

Anticipating societal collapse; Hints from the Stone Age

Marten Scheffer
  1. aEnvironmental Sciences Division, Wageningen University, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS September 27, 2016 113 (39) 10733-10735; first published September 16, 2016; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1612728113
Marten Scheffer
aEnvironmental Sciences Division, Wageningen University, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Marten.Scheffer@wur.nl
  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Few aspects of human history are as mindboggling as the sudden disintegration of advanced societies. It is tempting to seek common patterns or even draw some lessons for modern times from the many ancient cases of societal disintegration. In PNAS, Downey et al. (1) report that universal warning signals of reduced resilience systematically preceded the collapse of Stone Age societies. Might similar indicators of fragility be relevant in modern times? Of course, the nature of human societies has changed entirely. However, there are at times striking parallels between stories of collapse even if they happened in entirely different periods. Consider the abrupt abandonment of the iconic alcove sites in Mesa Verde by the ancestral Puebloan people: the greatest “vanishing act” in prehistoric America (2). Archaeological evidence now reveals that before Pueblo peoples massively migrated in the mid-to-late 1200s, there had actually been a slow build-up of tension (3, 4). Over a century of drought, violence, and political turmoil drove increasing numbers of people into the Mesa Verde region, which was relatively productive for farming, straining carrying capacity as well as cultural traditions and resulting in destabilizing conflicts. Portions of the northern Southwest began to empty out in the first decades of the 13th century and by the mid-1200s even the favored central Mesa Verde region was starting to lose population, well in advance of the “Great Drought” beginning in the late 1270s that seems to have given the final blow. Now, Syria is the scene of a sudden massive exodus, and some aspects of the complex situation do seem to echo the Pueblo story. The Fertile Crescent has likely been experiencing the worst drought in 900 y, making subsistence farming in the countryside extremely challenging and driving millions in Syria to the cities, where tensions increased (5). An incident—torture of a group of teenagers that had painted antigovernment graffiti on the walls of a school—eventually sparked the violent conflict, leading up to an accelerating mass migration with millions on the move. Drought, aggregation in cities, cultural clash, violent conflict, and exodus appear as common elements in otherwise entirely different settings. On closer inspection, there is of course a large diversity in the numerous documented cases of societal crumbling, both in the drivers and in the way change unfolded (6). Dramatic demographic collapse of resource-strapped societies, as in the Rapa Nui (Easter Island) people and the Greenland Norse of the early 15th century (7, 8), represent one end of the range, whereas in other cases (including the Pueblo vanishing act) people abandoned the old physical and social structures to accommodate new ways of living (9).

Perhaps the single most-intriguing aspect across stories of collapse is the speed with which massive change can be precipitated. This rapidity is also the aspect that makes such events feel so relevant from a modern perspective. How is it that a once-thriving society can so suddenly fall apart? Could it happen again? If so, is there any way we can foresee where and when?

If collapse is just driven by extreme events, such as epidemics or monster droughts, it may be entirely unforeseeable. However, if the underlying cause is a gradual loss of resilience, causing societies to become fragile, we might be able to predict where collapse is most likely. Fragility of states is typically estimated indirectly from social, economic and political risk factors (10), but now Downey et al. (1) suggest that the risk of societal collapse might also be measured directly from observed dynamics that signal a loss of resilience. Their inspiration comes from systems theory. It has become clear over the past years that loss of resilience may be inferred from subtle changes in dynamics in a wide range of complex systems as they approach a tipping point (11). The underlying generic phenomenon is that recovery from small perturbations becomes slow if resilience becomes small, resulting in elevated temporal autocorrelation (memory) and variance under natural fluctuating conditions (Fig. 1). Loss of resilience may happen in many situations, but the vicinity of a tipping point is a particularly interesting one, as here it signals an increased risk of entering an avalanche of self-propelling change. Indicators of such “critical slowing down” before a tipping point have been demonstrated in laboratory populations (12, 13), paleo climate (14, 15), and ecosystems (16). It has been speculated that societal shifts should be no exception to the rule that a measurable loss of resilience forewarns a tipping point (17), but so far it had been challenging to show this from the data.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Indicators of the loss of resilience in the vicinity of a tipping point. (A) Far from a tipping point, the state of the system (the ball) is resilient: the basin of attraction is large and perturbations will not easily drive the system toward an alternative state. (B) If a system is close to a tipping point the basin of attraction will be small, and a perturbation may easily push the system into an alternative basin. Note that the actual state of the system by itself does not reveal such fragility. However, dynamics around the equilibrium differ from those when the basin of attraction is large (as in A). In the fragile state (B), the recovery rate from a small perturbation is smaller (arrow), and as a result the fluctuations in a stochastic environment will tend to be larger and more time-correlated, as shown in the Insets (modified from refs. 22 and 23).

Now Downey et al. (1) show evidence for such critical slowing down before societal crashes, and it comes from surprisingly ancient times. About 8,000 y ago, Europe was the scene of a revolution changing the face of the Earth. Originating in the Fertile Crescent (today the scene of an exodus), demographically aggressive agricultural societies and their techniques began spreading east and west, displacing, engulfing, or modifying foraging societies. Neolithic settlements were in a number of marked regions, and Downey et al. estimate population densities in each region from the number of settlements that were in use at any given moment, using radiocarbon dating reconstructions. Such reconstructions suggest that populations were not steadily increasing. Instead, periods of growth typically ended in a collapse of numbers (18). The novel finding now is that leading up to such collapse, the dynamics of populations as reconstructed from summed probability densities of radiocarbon-dated archaeological sites typically show rising variance and rising temporal correlation, tell-tale signs of declining resilience (Fig. 1).

What could have caused these early farming communities to stumble or crash? Would diseases or conflict be involved? Downey et al. (1) suggest that deforestation and overexploitation of the land might have played a role. In most places, the authors find evidence for repeated cycles of boom-and-bust with a length of 400–1,000 y. Would that be the time for the land to recover? We do not know, but similar cycles have been found for a later period in estimated population numbers in South America after colonization of the continent (19). The simplest interpretation could indeed be one of classic consumer–resource cycles. However, one may wonder if societies would not notice declining conditions in time to move or change strategies before a crash occurred.

One theory is that societies tend to resist change until it is too late for smooth adjustments. Indeed, some fundamental mechanisms that hamper our capacity for change have been well documented. There is the “sunk-cost effect” preventing people from abandoning acquired property (or ways of living or beliefs) even if that would rationally be better (20). Then there is the “by-stander effect,” leading one to copy the behavior of others in case of doubt. This effect is known for explaining why often no-one in a crowd of by-standers comes to the rescue (21). Finally, elites may have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo, thus delaying societal change (8). Certainly such mechanisms are not specific to the Stone Age. Indeed, it may be argued that in more sophisticated societies with more elaborate physical structures and social systems, some of those mechanisms that prevent change might become stronger rather than weaker.

This way of thinking naturally leads to the question as to whether the findings from the Neolithic might have any relevance for interpreting current challenges to societies. It would be an open door to say that a society can prevent collapse by adapting in time. However, if we take that reasoning through, could it be that most of the societal “collapses,” such as violent civil conflicts and mass migrations, happen in fragile situations resulting from a gradual loss of resilience? If so, would there be ways to use the toolbox of systems science and big data to complement current risk markers by scanning the globe for empirical indicators of resilience?

Footnotes

  • ↵1Email: Marten.Scheffer{at}wur.nl.
  • Author contributions: M.S. wrote the paper.

  • The author declares no conflict of interest.

  • See companion article on page 9751 in issue 35 of volume 113.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Downey SS,
    2. Haas WR Jr,
    3. Shennan SJ
    (2016) European Neolithic societies showed early warning signals of population collapse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113(35):9751–9756.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Monastersky R
    (2015) The greatest vanishing act in prehistoric America. Nature 527(7576):26–29.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Glowacki DM
    (2015) Living and Leaving: A Social History of Regional Depopulation in Thirteenth-Century Mesa Verde (Univ of Arizona Press, Tucson), pp 312.
    .
  4. ↵
    1. Schwindt DM, et al.
    (2016) The social consequences of climate change in the central Mesa Verde region. Am Antiq 81(1):74–96.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. ↵
    1. Kelley CP,
    2. Mohtadi S,
    3. Cane MA,
    4. Seager R,
    5. Kushnir Y
    (2015) Climate change in the Fertile Crescent and implications of the recent Syrian drought. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(11):3241–3246.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Tainter J
    (1988) The Collapse of Complex Societies (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK).
    .
  7. ↵
    1. Nelson MC, et al.
    (2016) Climate challenges, vulnerabilities, and food security. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113(2):298–303.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Diamond J
    (2004) Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Survive (Viking Adult, New York), pp 592.
    .
  9. ↵
    1. Schwartz G,
    2. Nicols JJ
    (2006) After Collapse: The Regeneration of Complex Societies (Univ of Arizona Press, Tuscon).
    .
  10. ↵
    1. Sekhar CSC
    (2010) Fragile states: The role of social, political, and economic factors. J Dev Soc 26(3):263–293.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Scheffer M,
    2. Carpenter SR,
    3. Dakos V,
    4. Van Nes EH
    (2015) Generic indicators of ecological resilience: Inferring the chance of a critical transition. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 46:145–167.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    1. Dai L,
    2. Vorselen D,
    3. Korolev KS,
    4. Gore J
    (2012) Generic indicators for loss of resilience before a tipping point leading to population collapse. Science 336(6085):1175–1177.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Veraart AJ, et al.
    (2011) Recovery rates reflect distance to a tipping point in a living system. Nature 481(7381):357–359.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Dakos V, et al.
    (2008) Slowing down as an early warning signal for abrupt climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(38):14308–14312.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Lenton TM,
    2. Livina VN,
    3. Dakos V,
    4. Scheffer M
    (2012) Climate bifurcation during the last deglaciation? Clim Past 8(4):1127–1139.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. ↵
    1. Carpenter SR, et al.
    (2011) Early warnings of regime shifts: A whole-ecosystem experiment. Science 332(6033):1079–1082.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Battiston S, et al.
    (2016) Complex systems. Complexity theory and financial regulation. Science 351(6275):818–819.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Shennan S, et al.
    (2013) Regional population collapse followed initial agriculture booms in mid-Holocene Europe. Nat Commun 4:2486.
    .
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Goldberg A,
    2. Mychajliw AM,
    3. Hadly EA
    (2016) Post-invasion demography of prehistoric humans in South America. Nature 532(7598):232–235.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Janssen MA,
    2. Kohler TA,
    3. Scheffer M
    (2003) Sunk-cost effects and vulnerability to collapse in ancient societies. Curr Anthropol 44(5):722–728.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. ↵
    1. Latane B,
    2. Rodin A
    (1969) A lady in distress: Inhibiting effects of friends and strangers on bystander intervention. J Exp Soc Psychol 5(2):189–202.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. ↵
    1. Scheffer M, et al.
    (2009) Early-warning signals for critical transitions. Nature 461(7260):53–59.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Scheffer M
    (2010) Complex systems: Foreseeing tipping points. Nature 467(7314):411–412.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Anticipating societal collapse; Hints from the Stone Age
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Anticipating collapse; Hints from the Stone Age
Marten Scheffer
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Sep 2016, 113 (39) 10733-10735; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1612728113

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Anticipating collapse; Hints from the Stone Age
Marten Scheffer
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Sep 2016, 113 (39) 10733-10735; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1612728113
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Article Classifications

  • Social Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Biological Sciences
  • Sustainability Science

See related content:

  • Early warnings of Neolithic collapses detected
    - Aug 30, 2016
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 113 (39)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Smoke emanates from Japan’s Fukushima nuclear power plant a few days after tsunami damage
Core Concept: Muography offers a new way to see inside a multitude of objects
Muons penetrate much further than X-rays, they do essentially zero damage, and they are provided for free by the cosmos.
Image credit: Science Source/Digital Globe.
Water from a faucet fills a glass.
News Feature: How “forever chemicals” might impair the immune system
Researchers are exploring whether these ubiquitous fluorinated molecules might worsen infections or hamper vaccine effectiveness.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Dmitry Naumov.
Venus flytrap captures a fly.
Journal Club: Venus flytrap mechanism could shed light on how plants sense touch
One protein seems to play a key role in touch sensitivity for flytraps and other meat-eating plants.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Kuttelvaserova Stuchelova.
Illustration of groups of people chatting
Exploring the length of human conversations
Adam Mastroianni and Daniel Gilbert explore why conversations almost never end when people want them to.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Horse fossil
Mounted horseback riding in ancient China
A study uncovers early evidence of equestrianism in ancient China.
Image credit: Jian Ma.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Cozzarelli Prize
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490