Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology
Commentary

Patterns of deleterious variation between human populations reveal an unbalanced load

Rajiv C. McCoy and Joshua M. Akey
PNAS January 26, 2016 113 (4) 809-811; first published January 19, 2016; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1524016113
Rajiv C. McCoy
aDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joshua M. Akey
aDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: akeyj@uw.edu

See related content:

  • Deleterious alleles in human genomes
    - Dec 28, 2015
  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Each human individual carries ∼30–60 de novo mutations that arose in the germ line of his or her parents (1). At the population level, the result is a massive influx of new mutations every generation, whose evolutionary trajectory is shaped by the joint effects of stochastic and deterministic evolutionary forces. Indeed, considerable information about human history, including changes in population size, structure, and timings of major diasporas, is embedded in extant patterns of neutral genetic variation (2). For example, genetic data from global human populations show a striking gradient of declining genetic diversity with distance from Africa, which has been attributed to serial founder effects associated with the Out-of-Africa migration and subsequent global expansion (3⇓–5). However, in contrast to neutral variation, considerably less is known about geographic patterns of deleterious variation, the fate of which is governed by both random genetic drift and purifying selection. In PNAS, Henn et al. (6) address this question by performing whole-genome sequencing of 54 individuals from seven geographically diverse populations. The authors show that differences in demographic history among populations have influenced patterns of deleterious mutations in a manner predicted by a model of serial founder effects during geographic range expansions (Fig. 1). In addition to revealing new insights into the interaction between selection and demography during recent human evolution, the study quantifies within- and between-population variation in mutational burden, with implications for predicting individual disease risk.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Schematic illustration of the interaction between selection and genetic drift during serial bottlenecks and range expansion. As a consequence of strong genetic drift at the edge of the expanding wave, deleterious alleles (orange) that were previously held at low frequencies by purifying selection may surf to higher frequencies. Serial bottlenecks also lead to the loss of many alleles. Together, these processes produce a pattern of declining diversity with distance from the origin of expansion, along with pushing deleterious alleles that survive toward higher frequencies.

The work of Henn et al. (6) is timely, as it addresses an issue of considerable interest, complexity, and recent controversy (7⇓⇓⇓⇓–12). Major points of contention arising from genome-scale studies include whether empirical patterns of deleterious variation vary among human populations, whether such differences lead to differences in genetic load, and the relative contributions of drift and selection in shaping these patterns. Henn et al. (6) revisit these topics armed with novel statistical methods and new genome-sequence data from geographically diverse individuals. A key novelty of this work is that the authors consider predictions of mutational effect size in their analyses. Specifically, they stratified mutations according to Genomic Evolutionary Rate Profiling (GERP) score, a method that quantifies the degree of evolutionary constraint inferred from a multispecies genome alignment (13). Henn et al. (6) observed a statistically significant elevation in the number of deleterious alleles per individual in non-African compared with African populations, as well as an increase in the number of homozygous deleterious genotypes carried by individuals as a function of distance from Africa. These observations were largely driven by mutations predicted to have modest effects, consistent with theoretical predictions (8, 14). It is important to note, however, that although statistically significant differences were detected, absolute interpopulation differences in average number of deleterious alleles per individual were small. Furthermore, there remain substantial limitations to assigning fitness effects to individual variants identified in sequencing datasets. Existing functional annotation methods are based primarily on evolutionary conservation, as well as predicted impacts on protein structure for nonsynonymous variants. However, there is relatively low concordance among sets of variants predicted to be deleterious by different algorithms, and experimental validation of these methods suggests a modest ability to distinguish clinically relevant and nearly neutral mutations (15). Furthermore, it is plausible that fitness effects vary according to both the external and genomic environment (i.e., epistasis). Despite these limitations, the work of Henn et al. (6) substantially adds to a growing body of work (reviewed in ref. 16), clearly demonstrating that patterns of deleterious mutations vary among human populations.

To better understand the origins of these differences, Henn et al. (6) performed spatially explicit forward simulations to show that a model of serial founder effects during range expansion can recapitulate features of deleterious variation observed in the empirical data. To quantify the impacts of simulated demographic events on deleterious versus neutral variation, the authors devised a statistic called RH, defined as (Hnue – Hdel)/Hneu, where Hneu indicates heterozygosity at neutral sites and Hdel indicates heterozygosity at sites predicted to be deleterious based on their GERP score. This statistic was then compared across populations to determine whether selection had distinct impacts relative to drift in different populations. The authors found that RH was significantly lower in non-African relative to African populations across a wide range of GERP scores. A diminished strength of selection relative to drift as a consequence of a demographic bottleneck is a classic prediction of population genetic theory. Specifically, Ohta (14) showed that the product of the effective population size (Ne) and the selection coefficient (s) determines the behavior of a deleterious mutation. When s << 1/4Ne, mutations will behave as effectively neutral. During a bottleneck, more mutations meet this condition, and drift allows some to reach high frequencies and occasionally fix in the population (Fig. 1). The true demographic history of human populations is certainly more complex than the serial bottleneck model studied by Henn et al. (6), including ancient introgression with other hominin species, long-distance dispersal, population replacement, and repeated admixture among human lineages (17). Nonetheless, the fact that a simple model captures key features of the data underscores the importance of serial bottlenecks in shaping patterns of deleterious variation.

Henn et al. (6) also addressed the more difficult question of whether genetic load varies among the study populations. The significance of genetic load—the aggregate fitness reduction as a result of deleterious mutations—has been controversial since its conception by Haldane (18). Formalized by Crow (19), genetic load (L) is quantified by comparing the average fitness in the population (W¯) to that of a theoretical genotype with the maximum possible fitness (generally scaled to 1), such that L = 1 – W¯. Henn et al. (6) show that estimates of L are highly sensitive to model parameters, such as the distributions of fitness and dominance effects. These quantities are among the least understood in population genetics, although mutation accumulation experiments in model organisms (20) and large-scale sequencing of rare mutations are providing paths forward in this regard. Given the uncertainty about the distribution of dominance effects, Henn et al. (6) evaluated two extreme models to place bounds on their estimates: The work of Henn et al. is an important step in narrowing the divide between seemingly contradictory observations and conclusions regarding patterns of deleterious mutations among human populations.a model in which the fitness effects of all deleterious mutations are completely recessive and a model in which all deleterious mutations are perfectly additive. The authors found that load increases with distance from Africa for the recessive model (by ∼10–30%), but is approximately equal across populations for the additive model, consistent with earlier work (11, 12). As the true distribution of dominance effects undoubtedly lies somewhere in between, these results support the interpretation that genetic load differs modestly among populations.

In summary, the work of Henn et al. (6) is an important step in narrowing the divide between seemingly contradictory observations and conclusions regarding patterns of deleterious mutations among human populations. It is becoming increasingly clear that some population genetic characteristics of deleterious mutations vary among populations, but as is the case with neutral mutations, differences among populations are small relative to differences among individuals. Nonetheless, there remains much to learn about the dynamics of nonneutral variation in nonequilibrium populations, particularly for more realistic, complex, and spatially explicit models of human history. In addition to evolutionary questions, the study of deleterious mutations has practical implications for understanding and predicting human disease. As we enter the era of personalized medicine, it is important to consider which measures of damaging mutations best capture individual disease risk. While genetic load is a useful construct in theoretical population genetics, its utility for studying human disease is limited. Studies like that of Henn et al. (6) bring us closer to the goal of characterizing the individual burden of deleterious mutations, as well as understanding the complex evolutionary processes that produced it.

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: akeyj{at}uw.edu.
  • Author contributions: R.C.M. and J.M.A. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • See companion article on page E440.

View Abstract

References

  1. ↵
    1. Shendure J,
    2. Akey JM
    (2015) The origins, determinants, and consequences of human mutations. Science 349(6255):1478–1483
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Schraiber JG,
    2. Akey JM
    (2015) Methods and models for unravelling human evolutionary history. Nat Rev Genet 16(12):727–740
    .
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Ramachandran S, et al.
    (2005) Support from the relationship of genetic and geographic distance in human populations for a serial founder effect originating in Africa. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102(44):15942–15947
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Excoffier L,
    2. Foll M,
    3. Petit RJ
    (2009) Genetic consequences of range expansions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:481–501
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. ↵
    1. Peischl S,
    2. Dupanloup I,
    3. Kirkpatrick M,
    4. Excoffier L
    (2013) On the accumulation of deleterious mutations during range expansions. Mol Ecol 22(24):5972–5982
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. ↵
    1. Henn BM, et al.
    (2016) Distance from sub-Saharan Africa predicts mutational load in diverse human genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:E440–E449
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Lohmueller KE
    (2014) The distribution of deleterious genetic variation in human populations. Curr Opin Genet Dev 29:139–146
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Peischl S,
    2. Excoffier L
    (2015) Expansion load: Recessive mutations and the role of standing genetic variation. Mol Ecol 24(9):2084–2094
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. ↵
    1. Lohmueller KE, et al.
    (2008) Proportionally more deleterious genetic variation in European than in African populations. Nature 451(7181):994–997
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Fu W,
    2. Gittelman RM,
    3. Bamshad MJ,
    4. Akey JM
    (2014) Characteristics of neutral and deleterious protein-coding variation among individuals and populations. Am J Hum Genet 95(4):421–436
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Simons YB,
    2. Turchin MC,
    3. Pritchard JK,
    4. Sella G
    (2014) The deleterious mutation load is insensitive to recent population history. Nat Genet 46(3):220–224
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Do R, et al.
    (2015) No evidence that selection has been less effective at removing deleterious mutations in Europeans than in Africans. Nat Genet 47(2):126–131
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Davydov EV, et al.
    (2010) Identifying a high fraction of the human genome to be under selective constraint using GERP++. PLOS Comput Biol 6(12):e1001025
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Ohta T
    (1992) The nearly neutral theory of molecular evolution. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 23:263–286
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. ↵
    1. Miosge LA, et al.
    (2015) Comparison of predicted and actual consequences of missense mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112(37):E5189–E5198
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Henn BM,
    2. Botigué LR,
    3. Bustamante CD,
    4. Clark AG,
    5. Gravel S
    (2015) Estimating the mutation load in human genomes. Nat Rev Genet 16(6):333–343
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Pickrell JK,
    2. Reich D
    (2014) Toward a new history and geography of human genes informed by ancient DNA. Trends Genet 30(9):377–389
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Haldane JBS
    (1937) The effect of variation of fitness. Am Nat 71(735):337–349
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. ↵
    1. Crow JF
    (1958) Some possibilities for measuring selection intensities in man. Hum Biol 30(1):1–13
    .
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Halligan DL,
    2. Keightley PD
    (2009) Spontaneous mutation accumulation studies in evolutionary genetics. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:151–172
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Patterns of deleterious variation between human populations reveal an unbalanced load
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The human mutational burden
Rajiv C. McCoy, Joshua M. Akey
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Jan 2016, 113 (4) 809-811; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1524016113

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
The human mutational burden
Rajiv C. McCoy, Joshua M. Akey
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Jan 2016, 113 (4) 809-811; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1524016113
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 113 (4)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Article Classifications

  • Biological Sciences
  • Genetics

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Abstract depiction of a guitar and musical note
Science & Culture: At the nexus of music and medicine, some see disease treatments
Although the evidence is still limited, a growing body of research suggests music may have beneficial effects for diseases such as Parkinson’s.
Image credit: Shutterstock/agsandrew.
Scientist looking at an electronic tablet
Opinion: Standardizing gene product nomenclature—a call to action
Biomedical communities and journals need to standardize nomenclature of gene products to enhance accuracy in scientific and public communication.
Image credit: Shutterstock/greenbutterfly.
One red and one yellow modeled protein structures
Journal Club: Study reveals evolutionary origins of fold-switching protein
Shapeshifting designs could have wide-ranging pharmaceutical and biomedical applications in coming years.
Image credit: Acacia Dishman/Medical College of Wisconsin.
White and blue bird
Hazards of ozone pollution to birds
Amanda Rodewald, Ivan Rudik, and Catherine Kling talk about the hazards of ozone pollution to birds.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Goats standing in a pin
Transplantation of sperm-producing stem cells
CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing can improve the effectiveness of spermatogonial stem cell transplantation in mice and livestock, a study finds.
Image credit: Jon M. Oatley.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490