Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
Commentary

Unraveling the architecture of caveolae

Robert G. Parton and Brett M. Collins
  1. aInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, 4072 QLD, Australia;
  2. bCentre for Microscopy and Microanalysis, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, 4072 QLD, Australia

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS December 13, 2016 113 (50) 14170-14172; first published November 28, 2016; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1617954113
Robert G. Parton
aInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, 4072 QLD, Australia;
bCentre for Microscopy and Microanalysis, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, 4072 QLD, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: r.parton@imb.uq.edu.au b.collins@imb.uq.edu.au
Brett M. Collins
aInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, 4072 QLD, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: r.parton@imb.uq.edu.au b.collins@imb.uq.edu.au
  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The eukaryotic cell surface is composed of many distinct membrane domains that are formed by the cooperative interactions of different proteins and lipids. These domains are important for membrane trafficking and cell signaling and are modulated in turn by changes in the cell environment. Caveolae (“little caves”) are ∼60-nm membrane invaginations (Fig. 1) that are a dominant surface feature of many mammalian cells, including muscle fibers, endothelia, and adipocytes, where they play a role in membrane homeostasis, signaling, and cellular mechanoprotection. Formation of caveolae in vertebrate cells requires two distinct protein families: the membrane-embedded caveolins (CAV1–3) and the peripheral membrane cavins (Cavin1–4). Although the general morphology of caveolae has been known for decades, the atypical structures of the protein subunits has meant that progress has been slow with regards to the high-resolution studies of caveola architecture. By high-resolution scanning electron microscopy (EM) and frozen deep-etch transmission EM, caveolae have been shown to be coated with striations (1, 2) or to possess spike-like structures (3), very different from other well-characterized vesicle coats, such as clathrin (4, 5). In PNAS, Stoeber et al. use a combination of biochemical dissection and EM to provide important insights into the underlying architecture of the caveola protein coat (6).

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Proposed model for the assembly of caveolae. (A) Electron micrograph of caveolae in an adipocyte cell line. (Scale bar, 100 nm.) (B) Schematic diagrams depicting the main features of the CAV1 and Cavin1 proteins required for caveola formation. Cavins possess two regions of α-helical structure, termed HR1 and HR2, which are rich in basic residues. These are linked by disordered acidic sequences DR1–DR3. Caveolins are membrane-integral proteins that are embedded by a central helix–turn–helix. They also possess a conserved sequence suggested to be involved in oligomerization (oligomerization domain, OD) and a sequence with potential roles in protein–protein interactions (caveolin scaffolding domain, CSD), although this is controversial (20). (C) Proposed model for caveolar assembly by Stoeber et al. (6). CAV1 can be isolated as disk-shaped oligomers ∼15 nm in diameter that are proposed to be underlying building blocks of the caveolar coat. Cavin1 trimerizes through its N-terminal HR1 domain (10), and then can form oligomers arranged in a net-like structure. These oligomers organize into striated patterns on the surface of caveolae in cooperation with the CAV1 protein. (i) In the model proposed by Stoeber et al. (6) the cavin trimers form intermolecular networks via HR2 domain coiled-coil interactions. (ii) Alternate mechanisms for intramolecular cavin interactions, such as electrostatic interactions, have also been proposed (8).

The first protein component of caveolae to be identified and shown to be essential for caveola formation was CAV1 (7⇓–9). Subsequently, it was found that both CAV2 and muscle-specific CAV3 homologs are also localized to caveolae. Caveolin proteins are ∼20 kDa and possess two membrane-inserted α-helices with cytoplasmic N- and C-terminal sequences. These proteins form oligomeric complexes at the plasma membrane that line the cytoplasmic leaflet of the invaginated caveola structures. Cavins, although equally important for caveola formation, were only identified in the past decade through proteomic and cellular studies from several groups. Cavins also possess a conserved and unique structural organization, in this case consisting of conserved N- and C-terminal α-helical domains (HR1 and HR2) interspersed by disordered linker sequences (DR1, DR2, DR3) (10). Although recent studies have begun to tease out the functions of these domains in membrane recruitment, remodeling, and protein–protein interactions, our understanding is still limited. For example, how do caveolin oligomers assemble within caveolae, and what drives cavin oligomerization and recruitment to caveolar domains at the cell surface?

In their report, Stoeber et al. (6) propose a model for the arrangement of the caveolin and cavin proteins that begins to address some of the ongoing questions in the field. Affinity purification of Cavin1 expressed in HEK293 cells revealed the presence of heterogeneous particles with a mesh-like appearance by cryoEM and 3D electron tomography. These particles bound robustly to liposomes containing phosphatidylserine (PS) or phosphatidic acid, as seen previously using recombinant cavin proteins (10, 11), and showed a propensity to form relatively well-ordered lattices of protein on the membrane surface. Interestingly, in this in vitro system the full-length Cavin1 protein could be observed on the interior surface of the vesicles, which Stoeber et al. (6) suggest may be because of the occurrence of frequent inward invagination of the PS-containing liposomes. Most remarkably, Cavin1 appeared to form membrane-dependent polygonal arrays, which begins to suggest a potential for protein–protein and protein–membrane interactions to generate a structural scaffold from a loose net-like assembly of soluble cavin oligomers. Next, Stoeber et al. (6) probed the importance of the HR1 and HR2 domains of Cavin1 for oligomerization, membrane association, and membrane remodeling activity. Both HR1 and HR2 were found to be equally important for membrane localization in cells; however, although removal of HR1 prevented oligomer formation altogether, removing HR2 still yielded partial oligomers, albeit smaller than the 60S particles of the wild-type Cavin1 protein. When the HR2-deleted Cavin1 protein was analyzed by negative-stain EM, elongated fiber-like particles were observed, which are also consistent with the crystal structure of cavin1 HR1 and EM studies of full-length Cavin1 purified from bacteria (10). Notably this protein could bind to PS-containing liposomes and generate membrane tubules that showed evidence of membrane-apposed filamentous arrays by cryoEM tomography.

Stoeber et al. (6) next extended their analyses to the other major structural component of caveolae, the integral membrane protein, CAV1. Although this necessitated the use of detergents and negative staining, rather than cryoEM, the detergent solubilized 8S CAV1 oligomers were found to form relatively homogeneous disk-shaped particles ∼15 nm in diameter, which also resemble particles of recombinant CAV3 seen previously when expressed in insect cells (12). Finally, cryoEM tomography of caveolae in situ suggested that rather than being purely spherical, caveola bulbs possess inherent polygonal symmetries. Interestingly, identical polygonal symmetry is observed by cryoEM in a model system in which CAV1 alone drives formation of caveola-like vesicles in bacterial membranes (13). This finding strongly suggests that CAV1 is responsible for this polygonal architecture, rather than the peripheral cavin coat, although in mammalian cells both components are required to form a stable caveola.

Putting these results together, Stoeber et al. (6) propose a working model for the assembly of the cavin and caveolin proteins required to form functional caveolae (Fig. 1). In this model, the Cavin1 HR1 forms a trimeric coiled-coil structure as an intermediate to forming cavin oligomers. The assembly of the cavin oligomer and presentation of basic patches within HR1 and HR2 promote membrane recruitment in conjunction with the membrane-embedded CAV1. Based on the dimensions of the purified CAV1 structures observed by EM, it is proposed that the ∼12 faces of the caveolar polygon may be occupied by individual CAV1 disk-shaped oligomers. This is an intriguing and highly novel suggestion, and certainly merits further study to determine its validity. Such an arrangement then allows formation of a meshwork of associated Cavin1 trimers at the membrane surface, where cooperative cavin–caveolin–lipid interactions then promote membrane invagination. Based on the importance of the HR2 domain in promoting the oligomerization of Cavin1, Stoeber et al. (6) evoke a model where this α-helical region, which is predicted to form coiled-coil structures, forms linkages between Cavin1 trimeric HR1 domains. Whether cavins self-associate via these proposed intratrimer linkages or via alternative mechanisms, such as lateral electrostatic interactions (8), however, will require further study. Why Cavin1, rather than other cavins, is essential for caveola formation was suggested to be because of a region in the Cavin1 HR2 domain with a higher propensity to form coiled-coils than other cavins, an interesting proposal that remains to be tested.

In comparison with clathrin-coated endocytic pits and other protein-coated vesicles, such as COPI and COPII, studies of caveolar architecture are still in their infancy. Studies by many laboratories in recent years are now beginning to bridge this gulf using approaches that include biochemical isolation, NMR spectroscopy, EM, and X-ray crystallography (6, 10, 12⇓⇓⇓⇓–17). A picture is now emerging of a vesicular structure that possesses much greater complexity than originally thought. In combination with an enormous literature on the cellular function and regulation of caveolae, however, many questions still remain to be answered. How does this organization fit with the observed striations associated with the cytoplasmic face of caveolae and shown to comprise cavins (15, 18)? The critical role of lipids, such as PS, phosphoinositides, and cholesterol in caveolae is an outstanding issue, and the structural models that are emerging may begin to suggest testable predictions about the importance of lipid–lipid and lipid–protein interactions in caveola formation, or indeed whether caveolae represent structures that function to organize lipid microdomains that can respond to cellular stimuli (19). As Stoeber et al. (6) suggest, the architecture of caveolae must also allow for extensive posttranslational modification by phosphorylation and ubiquitination that is known to occur in specific cavin and caveolin sequences. Finally, the structures of caveolae must allow them to rapidly and reversibly respond to changes in membrane signaling and mechanical tension. These new findings suggest that the principles involved in caveola formation may be more similar to those involved in clathrin-coated vesicle formation than previously imagined, despite their fundamental molecular differences.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) Grants APP569542 and APP1037320 (to R.G.P.); and Australian Research Council Grants DP120101298 (to B.M.C. and R.G.P.) and CE141000036 (to R.G.P.). R.G.P. is supported by NHMRC Senior Principal Research Fellowship APP1058565, and B.M.C. is supported by NHMRC Career Development Fellowship APP1061574.

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: r.parton{at}imb.uq.edu.au or b.collins{at}imb.uq.edu.au.
  • Author contributions: R.G.P. and B.M.C. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • See companion article on page E8069.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Peters KR,
    2. Carley WW,
    3. Palade GE
    (1985) Endothelial plasmalemmal vesicles have a characteristic striped bipolar surface structure. J Cell Biol 101(6):2233–2238.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Rothberg KG, et al.
    (1992) Caveolin, a protein component of caveolae membrane coats. Cell 68(4):673–682.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Richter T, et al.
    (2008) High-resolution 3D quantitative analysis of caveolar ultrastructure and caveola-cytoskeleton interactions. Traffic 9(6):893–909.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Faini M,
    2. Beck R,
    3. Wieland FT,
    4. Briggs JAG
    (2013) Vesicle coats: Structure, function, and general principles of assembly. Trends Cell Biol 23(6):279–288.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Kirchhausen T,
    2. Owen D,
    3. Harrison SC
    (2014) Molecular structure, function, and dynamics of clathrin-mediated membrane traffic. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 6(5):a016725.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Stoeber M, et al.
    (2016) Model for the architecture of caveolae based on a flexible, net-like assembly of Cavin1 and Caveolin discs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:E8069–E8078.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Echarri A,
    2. Del Pozo MA
    (2015) Caveolae—Mechanosensitive membrane invaginations linked to actin filaments. J Cell Sci 128(15):2747–2758.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Kovtun O,
    2. Tillu VA,
    3. Ariotti N,
    4. Parton RG,
    5. Collins BM
    (2015) Cavin family proteins and the assembly of caveolae. J Cell Sci 128(7):1269–1278.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Parton RG,
    2. del Pozo MA
    (2013) Caveolae as plasma membrane sensors, protectors and organizers. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 14(2):98–112.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Kovtun O, et al.
    (2014) Structural insights into the organization of the cavin membrane coat complex. Dev Cell 31(4):405–419.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Hill MM, et al.
    (2008) PTRF-Cavin, a conserved cytoplasmic protein required for caveola formation and function. Cell 132(1):113–124.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Whiteley G,
    2. Collins RF,
    3. Kitmitto A
    (2012) Characterization of the molecular architecture of human caveolin-3 and interaction with the skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor. J Biol Chem 287(48):40302–40316.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Ariotti N, et al.
    (2015) Molecular characterization of caveolin-induced membrane curvature. J Biol Chem 290(41):24875–24890.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Ludwig A, et al.
    (2013) Molecular composition and ultrastructure of the caveolar coat complex. PLoS Biol 11(8):e1001640.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Ludwig A,
    2. Nichols BJ,
    3. Sandin S
    (2016) Architecture of the caveolar coat complex. J Cell Sci 129(16):3077–3083.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Plucinsky SM,
    2. Glover KJ
    (2015) Secondary structure analysis of a functional construct of Caveolin-1 reveals a long C-terminal helix. Biophys J 109(8):1686–1688.
    .
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Rui H,
    2. Root KT,
    3. Lee J,
    4. Glover KJ,
    5. Im W
    (2014) Probing the U-shaped conformation of caveolin-1 in a bilayer. Biophys J 106(6):1371–1380.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Gambin Y, et al.
    (2013) Single-molecule analysis reveals self assembly and nanoscale segregation of two distinct cavin subcomplexes on caveolae. eLife 3:e01434.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Ariotti N, et al.
    (2014) Caveolae regulate the nanoscale organization of the plasma membrane to remotely control Ras signaling. J Cell Biol 204(5):777–792.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Collins BM,
    2. Davis MJ,
    3. Hancock JF,
    4. Parton RG
    (2012) Structure-based reassessment of the caveolin signaling model: Do caveolae regulate signaling through caveolin-protein interactions? Dev Cell 23(1):11–20.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Unraveling the architecture of caveolae
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Architecture of caveolae
Robert G. Parton, Brett M. Collins
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Dec 2016, 113 (50) 14170-14172; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1617954113

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Architecture of caveolae
Robert G. Parton, Brett M. Collins
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Dec 2016, 113 (50) 14170-14172; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1617954113
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Article Classifications

  • Biological Sciences
  • Cell Biology

See related content:

  • Model for the architecture of caveolae
    - Nov 10, 2016
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 113 (50)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Water from a faucet fills a glass.
News Feature: How “forever chemicals” might impair the immune system
Researchers are exploring whether these ubiquitous fluorinated molecules might worsen infections or hamper vaccine effectiveness.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Dmitry Naumov.
Reflection of clouds in the still waters of Mono Lake in California.
Inner Workings: Making headway with the mysteries of life’s origins
Recent experiments and simulations are starting to answer some fundamental questions about how life came to be.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Radoslaw Lecyk.
Cave in coastal Kenya with tree growing in the middle.
Journal Club: Small, sharp blades mark shift from Middle to Later Stone Age in coastal Kenya
Archaeologists have long tried to define the transition between the two time periods.
Image credit: Ceri Shipton.
Illustration of groups of people chatting
Exploring the length of human conversations
Adam Mastroianni and Daniel Gilbert explore why conversations almost never end when people want them to.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Panda bear hanging in a tree
How horse manure helps giant pandas tolerate cold
A study finds that giant pandas roll in horse manure to increase their cold tolerance.
Image credit: Fuwen Wei.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Cozzarelli Prize
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490