Edited by Natasha V. Raikhel, Center for Plant Cell Biology, Riverside, CA, and approved November 3, 2016 (received for review October 11, 2016)
How does a cell decide when to divide or initiate DNA replication? How does it regulate its own growth? These fundamental questions are not well understood in most organisms; this lack of understanding is particularly true for multicellular eukaryotes. Following classical studies in yeast, we have quantified the key aspects of cell growth and division dynamics in the Arabidopsis apical stem cell niche. Our results disprove various theories for plant stem cell size/cell cycle regulation, such as that cell cycle progression is triggered when a prefixed critical size is attained, and constitute the necessary first step in the development of integrative mechanistic theories for the coordinated regulation of cell cycle progression, cell growth, and cell size in plants.
Cell size and growth kinetics are fundamental cellular properties with important physiological implications. Classical studies on yeast, and recently on bacteria, have identified rules for cell size regulation in single cells, but in the more complex environment of multicellular tissues, data have been lacking. In this study, to characterize cell size and growth regulation in a multicellular context, we developed a 4D imaging pipeline and applied it to track and quantify epidermal cells over 3–4 d in Arabidopsis thaliana shoot apical meristems. We found that a cell size checkpoint is not the trigger for G2/M or cytokinesis, refuting the unexamined assumption that meristematic cells trigger cell cycle phases upon reaching a critical size. Our data also rule out models in which cells undergo G2/M at a fixed time after birth, or by adding a critical size increment between G2/M transitions. Rather, cell size regulation was intermediate between the critical size and critical increment paradigms, meaning that cell size fluctuations decay by ∼75% in one generation compared with 100% (critical size) and 50% (critical increment). Notably, this behavior was independent of local cell–cell contact topologies and of position within the tissue. Cells grew exponentially throughout the first >80% of the cell cycle, but following an asymmetrical division, the small daughter grew at a faster exponential rate than the large daughter, an observation that potentially challenges present models of growth regulation. These growth and division behaviors place strong constraints on quantitative mechanistic descriptions of the cell cycle and growth control.
↵1L.W. and Y.R. contributed equally to this work.
Author contributions: L.W., Y.R., and H.J. designed research; L.W., Y.R., R.W., B.L., and J.T. performed research; L.W., Y.R., R.W., J.T., and H.J. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; L.W., Y.R., J.T., K.C.H., E.M.M., and H.J. analyzed data; and L.W., Y.R., R.W., K.C.H., E.M.M., and H.J. wrote the paper.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1616768113/-/DCSupplemental.
Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.
