Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology
Commentary

Sensing danger

Luciano A. Marraffini
PNAS January 3, 2017 114 (1) 15-16; first published December 20, 2016; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618747114
Luciano A. Marraffini
aLaboratory of Bacteriology, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Luciano.Marraffini@rockefeller.edu

See related content:

  • Quorum-sensing regulation of CRISPR-Cas
    - Nov 14, 2016
  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

CRISPR-Cas loci encode for an adaptive immune system in prokaryotes that provides defense against viruses (1) and plasmids (2) that infect these organisms. CRISPR loci contain a series of repetitive sequences intercalated with short sequences derived from invading viruses and plasmids (3⇓–5). These short sequences, called spacers, are acquired from the invader upon infection during an “immunization” event (1). This is the first phase of CRISPR-Cas immunity. The information stored in spacers is then used to target the invader in the second phase of the CRISPR immune response (6). Each spacer sequence is transcribed and processed as a short RNA called CRISPR RNA (crRNA) that directs RNA-guided Cas nucleases to their matching target in the invader’s genome to cleave it. Little is known about the regulation of the CRISPR-Cas immune response. The CRISPR-Cas locus present in Escherichia coli has been shown to be tightly repressed by HNS, a negative regulator of widespread effects in bacteria (7). Repression can be relieved by the LeuO activator (8), but environmental or physiological conditions that lead to the expression of the CRISPR-Cas machinery have not been identified.

In PNAS, Høyland-Kroghsbo et al. (9) describe the regulation of the CRISPR-Cas locus of the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa through quorum sensing (QS) pathways. QS is a mechanism that bacteria use to communicate with each other and organize collective behaviors (10), mediated by genes that are responsible for the production and detection of extracellular chemicals known as autoinducers. Upon bacterial growth, the increase in the concentration of autoinducers triggers a signaling cascade that modifies the response of the bacterial population to different environmental cues (Fig. 1). Høyland-Kroghsbo et al. (9) first investigate whether the expression of the cas (CRISPR-associated) genes is affected by QS. cas genes flank the CRISPR array of repeats and spacers and are responsible for the execution of both phases of the CRISPR-Cas immune response (6). It was found that cas transcription is significantly increased at high cell density, and that this increase is dependent on both lasI and rhlI, the genes encoding for QS autoinducer synthases. Høyland-Kroghsbo et al. (9) then check for the effects of the deletion of these genes in both stages of the CRISPR-Cas immune response: targeting and immunization. The expectation is that the down-regulation of cas genes that results from the absence of autoinducer production in the lasI,rhlI double mutant should negatively affect CRISPR-Cas immunity. Targeting is tested through transformation with a plasmid harboring a target sequence, which is considerably reduced in the QS double mutant. Immunization is explored via PCR amplification of the CRISPR array, showing that wild-type, but not QS mutant, bacteria were able to expand the array with new spacers. Equivalent results were recently obtained in the antibiotic-producing bacterium Serratia (11), indicating that QS control of CRISPR-Cas expression may be a general regulatory mechanism of bacterial adaptive immunity.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Regulation of CRISPR-Cas activity by QS. At low cell density, low autoinducer (pink dot) concentrations result in the repression of CRISPR-cas loci through the QS pathway, keeping the CRISPR-Cas immune response at a minimum. In contrast, at high densities of bacteria (when they are most susceptible to phage attack) the increase in the concentration of autoinducer triggers the de-repression of CRISPR-cas loci. Expression of the Cas protein complex and crRNA guide prepares the cell for the cleavage (arrowhead) of incoming viruses.

These are important findings that open new avenues of research for some of the outstanding questions of CRISPR immunity. First, the findings show how bacteria can mount a coordinated antiphage response. It has been argued that at high cellular densities the danger of phage predation is markedly increased (12). Dense bacterial populations offer the possibility of extreme propagation to lytic phages, the phage progeny quickly finding a new, readily accessible host to infect next. In addition, rapidly growing bacteria tend to be clonal, reducing the chances that the next and nearby host is equipped with a phage-resistance genotype. In line with this theory, it has been already shown that QS can induce envelope resistance in E. coli (13) and Vibrio anguillarum (14) through the down-regulation of genes encoding for phage receptors. The involvement of QS in the CRISPR-Cas response adds another layer of organization to the bacterial antiphage resistance pathways. Second, the new findings provide a possible answer for a long-standing question about CRISPR immunity: how does this system prevent the acquisition of spacers from the chromosomal DNA? At the moment, experiments suggest that it is not possible for CRISPR-Cas systems to distinguish chromosomal vs. phage or plasmid DNA (they have the same chemistry after all). One study has demonstrated that the Cas machinery prefers to acquire new spacers from free DNA ends (15). Although this favors the acquisition of spacers from phages (at least during DNA injection they can expose a free DNA end) over the bacterial chromosome (which is a closed circle most of the time), many studies have shown that there still is extensive spacer acquisition from the bacterial genome (15⇓⇓⇓–19). The low expression of the cas genes involved in spacer integration when the CRISPR immune response is less needed provides one route to decrease the “autoimmunity” cost associated with bacterial adaptive immunity.

Finally, the findings of Høyland-Kroghsbo et al. (9) provide new avenues for the development of phage therapies to treat Pseudomonas infections. P. aeruginosa causes chronic airway infections in cystic fibrosis patients and recently has become resistant to many antimicrobial drugs (20). The need for new antibiotics has led to the exploration of phage therapy for Pseudomonas infections (21); however, there is the worrying possibility that bacteria will use phage-resistance pathways, such as CRISPR, to become refractory to phage treatment. The use of QS inhibitors that maintain the CRISPR-Cas immune response at a minimum level could provide a strategy to confront phage resistance. As a big plus, Pseudomonas virulence genes are regulated by QS and therefore the inhibition of these pathways can also lead to a reduction of pathogenicity (22). This will represent an interesting addition to the list of CRISPR-Cas systems applications for biotechnology, which includes strain immunization for the dairy industry (23), the development of sequence-specific antimicrobials (24, 25) and, most notably, genome editing (26⇓–28), an addition that requires the shut-down and not the exploitation of the CRISPR mechanisms. But the really exciting prospects lie in the future research that will elucidate the molecular mechanisms and implications behind QS regulation of the CRISPR-Cas immune response.

Footnotes

  • ↵1Email: Luciano.Marraffini{at}rockefeller.edu.
  • Author contributions: L.A.M. wrote the paper.

  • The author declares no conflict of interest.

  • See companion article on page 131.

View Abstract

References

  1. ↵
    1. Barrangou R, et al.
    (2007) CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes. Science 315(5819):1709–1712.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Marraffini LA,
    2. Sontheimer EJ
    (2008) CRISPR interference limits horizontal gene transfer in staphylococci by targeting DNA. Science 322(5909):1843–1845.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Bolotin A,
    2. Quinquis B,
    3. Sorokin A,
    4. Ehrlich SD
    (2005) Clustered regularly interspaced short palindrome repeats (CRISPRs) have spacers of extrachromosomal origin. Microbiology 151(Pt 8):2551–2561.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Mojica FJ,
    2. Díez-Villaseñor C,
    3. García-Martínez J,
    4. Soria E
    (2005) Intervening sequences of regularly spaced prokaryotic repeats derive from foreign genetic elements. J Mol Evol 60(2):174–182.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Pourcel C,
    2. Salvignol G,
    3. Vergnaud G
    (2005) CRISPR elements in Yersinia pestis acquire new repeats by preferential uptake of bacteriophage DNA, and provide additional tools for evolutionary studies. Microbiology 151(Pt 3):653–663.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Marraffini LA
    (2015) CRISPR-Cas immunity in prokaryotes. Nature 526(7571):55–61.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Pul U, et al.
    (2010) Identification and characterization of E. coli CRISPR-cas promoters and their silencing by H-NS. Mol Microbiol 75(6):1495–1512.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Westra ER, et al.
    (2010) H-NS-mediated repression of CRISPR-based immunity in Escherichia coli K12 can be relieved by the transcription activator LeuO. Mol Microbiol 77(6):1380–1393.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Høyland-Kroghsbo NM, et al.
    (2017) Quorum sensing controls the Pseudomonas aeruginosa CRISPR-Cas adaptive immune system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:131–135.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Papenfort K,
    2. Bassler BL
    (2016) Quorum sensing signal-response systems in Gram-negative bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol 14(9):576–588.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. ↵
    1. Patterson AG, et al.
    (November 17, 2016) Quorum sensing controls adaptive immunity through the regulation of multiple CRISPR-Cas systems. Mol Cell doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2016.11.012.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    1. Abedon ST
    (2012) Spatial vulnerability: Bacterial arrangements, microcolonies, and biofilms as responses to low rather than high phage densities. Viruses 4(5):663–687.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Høyland-Kroghsbo NM,
    2. Maerkedahl RB,
    3. Svenningsen SL
    (2013) A quorum-sensing-induced bacteriophage defense mechanism. MBio 4(1):e00362-12.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Tan D,
    2. Svenningsen SL,
    3. Middelboe M
    (2015) Quorum sensing determines the choice of antiphage defense strategy in Vibrio anguillarum. MBio 6(3):e00627.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. ↵
    1. Levy A, et al.
    (2015) CRISPR adaptation biases explain preference for acquisition of foreign DNA. Nature 520(7548):505–510.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Heler R, et al.
    (2015) Cas9 specifies functional viral targets during CRISPR-Cas adaptation. Nature 519(7542):199–202.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Paez-Espino D, et al.
    (2013) Strong bias in the bacterial CRISPR elements that confer immunity to phage. Nat Commun 4:1430.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Wei Y,
    2. Terns RM,
    3. Terns MP
    (2015) Cas9 function and host genome sampling in Type II-A CRISPR-Cas adaptation. Genes Dev 29(4):356–361.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Yosef I,
    2. Goren MG,
    3. Qimron U
    (2012) Proteins and DNA elements essential for the CRISPR adaptation process in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res 40(12):5569–5576.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Folkesson A, et al.
    (2012) Adaptation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to the cystic fibrosis airway: An evolutionary perspective. Nat Rev Microbiol 10(12):841–851.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Krylov VN
    (2014) Bacteriophages of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Long-term prospects for use in phage therapy. Adv Virus Res 88:227–278.
    .
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. O’Loughlin CT, et al.
    (2013) A quorum-sensing inhibitor blocks Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence and biofilm formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(44):17981–17986.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Barrangou R,
    2. Horvath P
    (2012) CRISPR: New horizons in phage resistance and strain identification. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol 3:143–162.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Bikard D, et al.
    (2014) Exploiting CRISPR-Cas nucleases to produce sequence-specific antimicrobials. Nat Biotechnol 32(11):1146–1150.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Citorik RJ,
    2. Mimee M,
    3. Lu TK
    (2014) Sequence-specific antimicrobials using efficiently delivered RNA-guided nucleases. Nat Biotechnol 32(11):1141–1145.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Cong L, et al.
    (2013) Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339(6121):819–823.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Jiang W,
    2. Bikard D,
    3. Cox D,
    4. Zhang F,
    5. Marraffini LA
    (2013) RNA-guided editing of bacterial genomes using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat Biotechnol 31(3):233–239.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Mali P, et al.
    (2013) RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science 339(6121):823–826.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Sensing danger
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Sensing danger
Luciano A. Marraffini
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Jan 2017, 114 (1) 15-16; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1618747114

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Sensing danger
Luciano A. Marraffini
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Jan 2017, 114 (1) 15-16; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1618747114
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 114 (1)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Article Classifications

  • Biological Sciences
  • Microbiology

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Abstract depiction of a guitar and musical note
Science & Culture: At the nexus of music and medicine, some see disease treatments
Although the evidence is still limited, a growing body of research suggests music may have beneficial effects for diseases such as Parkinson’s.
Image credit: Shutterstock/agsandrew.
Large piece of gold
News Feature: Tracing gold's cosmic origins
Astronomers thought they’d finally figured out where gold and other heavy elements in the universe came from. In light of recent results, they’re not so sure.
Image credit: Science Source/Tom McHugh.
Dancers in red dresses
Journal Club: Friends appear to share patterns of brain activity
Researchers are still trying to understand what causes this strong correlation between neural and social networks.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Yeongsik Im.
White and blue bird
Hazards of ozone pollution to birds
Amanda Rodewald, Ivan Rudik, and Catherine Kling talk about the hazards of ozone pollution to birds.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Goats standing in a pin
Transplantation of sperm-producing stem cells
CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing can improve the effectiveness of spermatogonial stem cell transplantation in mice and livestock, a study finds.
Image credit: Jon M. Oatley.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490