Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology
Research Article

Annual mass drownings of the Serengeti wildebeest migration influence nutrient cycling and storage in the Mara River

View ORCID ProfileAmanda L. Subalusky, View ORCID ProfileChristopher L. Dutton, Emma J. Rosi, and David M. Post
PNAS July 18, 2017 114 (29) 7647-7652; first published June 19, 2017; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1614778114
Amanda L. Subalusky
aDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511;
bCary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, NY 12545
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Amanda L. Subalusky
  • For correspondence: asubalusky@gmail.com
Christopher L. Dutton
aDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511;
bCary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, NY 12545
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Christopher L. Dutton
Emma J. Rosi
bCary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, NY 12545
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David M. Post
aDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  1. Edited by James A. Estes, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, and approved May 16, 2017 (received for review September 8, 2016)

See related content:

  • Cross-ecosystem subsidies in African savannas
    - Jul 10, 2017
  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & SI

Figures

  • Tables
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Map showing the Mara River Basin, Kenya, and its relationship to the Maasai Mara National Reserve (MMNR) and Serengeti National Park (SNP) (A), the distribution of wildebeest crossing sites along the Mara River coded by the number of mass drownings confirmed to have occurred at each site (for 21 of the 23 drownings) (B), and the distribution of 3,380 wildebeest carcasses over 5 km of river after a mass drowning in July 2011 at the crossing site coded red in B (C).

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Input and fate of wildebeest carcasses from mass drownings in the Mara River. (A) Percentage of dry mass composition of an average wildebeest carcass, with stoichiometric ratios by mass shown as C/N/P. (B) Microbial decomposition rates for wildebeest bone, skin, intestines, and muscle in the Mara River (mean ± SEM). (C) Daily estimations of total nitrogen (TN) vs. total phosphorus (TP) flux downstream of three carcass aggregations ranging from 1,000–3,400 carcasses. (D) Declines in NH4+-N concentration downstream of wildebeest carcasses and estimations of nutrient uptake length (Sw) on days 8, 16, and 26 after the drowning. (E) Total dry mass of wildebeest carcasses consumed by avian scavengers on aggregations of 16 and 40 carcasses. (F) Assimilation of wildebeest tissue (in November 2013, 1 mo after carcasses were present) and bone biofilm (in February 2014, 4 mo after carcasses were present) by three common fish taxa (mean ± 95% credibility intervals).

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Illustrative diagram showing estimated annual loading and transport pathways of C, N, and P from mass drownings of wildebeest in the Mara River, Kenya. Mean ± SD total loading estimations are at the top of the diagram in terms of carcasses and metric tons of C, N, and P, and the range of estimations (minimum–maximum) for the amount transported in each pathway are presented as the percentage of total loading. A through F align with data presented in Fig. 2. Fluxes through the two pathways illustrated in F are currently unknown.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table S1.

    Number and elemental composition of wildebeest carcasses entering the Mara River from 2011 to 2015

    YearNo. of mass drowningsNo. of carcassesCarcass dry mass,* 103 kgAverage aerial loading,† g of DM per m−2C, 103 kgN, 103 kgP, 103 kg
    201138,0003855901373216
    201269,4004532501613719
    201377,7503733601333116
    201442,70013064046115
    201533,40016414058137
    Mean (SD)4.6 (1.8)6,250 (3,000)301 (144)400 (210)107 (51)25(12)13(6)
    • DM, dry matter.

    • ↵* Total carcass biomass assuming a mean biomass of 175 kg of wet mass and 48 kg of dry mass per carcass.

    • ↵† Average aerial loading for mass drownings, where detailed carcass counts could be conducted over a spatially explicit area (12 of 23 mass drownings).

    • View popup
    Table S2.

    Elemental composition and decomposition rates of wildebeest carcass components

    Carcass elementPercentage of carcass,* mean (SD)C/N/P†Decay rate, k⋅d−1 (95% CI)Days to 95% biomass loss, mean days (95% CI)
    Stomach contents12.4 (2.9)69.2:3.3:1.0
    Muscle25.7 (0.7)152.0:45.7:1.0−0.188 (−0.168 to −0.208)16 (14–18)
    Internal organs‡7.2 (1.7)96.4:21.2:1.0−0.068 (−0.047 to −0.089)44 (38–63)
    Skin10.9 (2.0)215.5:72.5:1.0−0.043 (−0.038 to −0.048)70 (63–80)
    Bone43.7 (3.7)2.6:0.5:1.0−0.001 (−0.0013 to −0.0009)2,709 (2,285–3,327)
    Total carcass100.08.5:2.0:1.0
    • ↵* Based on dry mass.

    • ↵† C/N/P ratio is shown by mass.

    • ↵‡ Percentage of carcass and stoichiometry averaged across all internal organs; decay rate based on intestine.

    • View popup
    Table S3.

    Nutrient cycling in the Mara River after a drowning of 5,000 wildebeest

    Days after drowningNH4+SRP
    Sw,* kmVf,† m⋅d−1Umin,‡ mg⋅m−2⋅d−1Umax,§ mg⋅m−2⋅d−1Sw, kmVf, m⋅d−1Umin, mg⋅m−2⋅d−1Umax, mg⋅m−2⋅d−1
    834.40.531.2164.635.60.518.225.9
    1672.50.313.0115.851.60.516.616.6
    2669.90.310.942.7103.10.26.98.4
    • ↵* Nutrient uptake length.

    • ↵† Nutrient uptake velocity.

    • ↵‡ Minimum aerial uptake, based on upstream nutrient concentration.

    • ↵§ Maximum aerial uptake, based on peak nutrient concentrations measured within the sampling reach.

    • View popup
    Table S4.

    C and nutrient flux upstream and downstream of wildebeest carcass aggregations

    DateNo. of carcassesAverage Q, m3⋅s−1Upstream DOC flux, kgTotal carcass C loading, kgSoft tissue C loading, kgNet DOC flux, kgUpstream TN flux, kgTotal carcass N loading, kgSoft tissue N loading, kgNet TN flux, kgUpstream TP flux, kgTotal carcass P loading, kgSoft tissue P loading, kgNet TP flux, kg
    7/4/20113,3809.730,31057,90040,800−1,29017,08013,40010,0001,2701,5106,80032050
    11/5/201299015.696,27017,00012,0003,48064,2903,9002,900−1806,4502,00090−40
    9/25/20131,61016.610,849027,60019,4008,35060,7206,4004,7002,2406,2503,300150−210
    Mean (SD)1,990 (1,240)13.9 (3.7)78,360 (42,060)34,200 (21,300)24,100 (15,000)3,510 (4,820)47,370 (26,290)7,900 (4,900)5,900 (3,700)1,110 (1,220)4,740 (2,790)4,000 (2,500)190 (120)−65
    • All fluxes were calculated over a period of 25–29 d. Q, discharge; TN, total nitrogen.

    • View popup
    Table S5.

    Metabolic model for avian scavenger consumption of wildebeest carcasses

    SpeciesAverage mass, kgDaily energy expenditure, kJ⋅d−1Daily energy consumed, kJ⋅d−1Daily dry mass consumed, g⋅d−1Daily C consumed, g⋅d−1Daily N consumed, g⋅d−1Daily P consumed, g⋅d−1
    Maribou stork6.452,5772,99011551130.4
    White-backed vulture5.432,3212,69210446110.4
    Rüppell's vulture7.402,8033,25112556140.4
    Hooded vulture2.041,27714,812572560.2

Data supplements

  • Supporting Information

    • Download Supporting Information (PDF)
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Annual mass drownings of the Serengeti wildebeest migration influence nutrient cycling and storage in the Mara River
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Wildebeest mass drownings alter river ecosystem
Amanda L. Subalusky, Christopher L. Dutton, Emma J. Rosi, David M. Post
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Jul 2017, 114 (29) 7647-7652; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1614778114

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Wildebeest mass drownings alter river ecosystem
Amanda L. Subalusky, Christopher L. Dutton, Emma J. Rosi, David M. Post
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Jul 2017, 114 (29) 7647-7652; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1614778114
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 114 (29)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Article Classifications

  • Biological Sciences
  • Ecology

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results and Discussion
    • SI Materials and Methods
    • Conclusion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Abstract depiction of a guitar and musical note
Science & Culture: At the nexus of music and medicine, some see disease treatments
Although the evidence is still limited, a growing body of research suggests music may have beneficial effects for diseases such as Parkinson’s.
Image credit: Shutterstock/agsandrew.
Large piece of gold
News Feature: Tracing gold's cosmic origins
Astronomers thought they’d finally figured out where gold and other heavy elements in the universe came from. In light of recent results, they’re not so sure.
Image credit: Science Source/Tom McHugh.
Dancers in red dresses
Journal Club: Friends appear to share patterns of brain activity
Researchers are still trying to understand what causes this strong correlation between neural and social networks.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Yeongsik Im.
White and blue bird
Hazards of ozone pollution to birds
Amanda Rodewald, Ivan Rudik, and Catherine Kling talk about the hazards of ozone pollution to birds.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Goats standing in a pin
Transplantation of sperm-producing stem cells
CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing can improve the effectiveness of spermatogonial stem cell transplantation in mice and livestock, a study finds.
Image credit: Jon M. Oatley.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490