Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
Research Article

Insights into the red algae and eukaryotic evolution from the genome of Porphyra umbilicalis (Bangiophyceae, Rhodophyta)

Susan H. Brawley, Nicolas A. Blouin, Elizabeth Ficko-Blean, Glen L. Wheeler, Martin Lohr, Holly V. Goodson, Jerry W. Jenkins, Crysten E. Blaby-Haas, Katherine E. Helliwell, Cheong Xin Chan, Tara N. Marriage, View ORCID ProfileDebashish Bhattacharya, Anita S. Klein, Yacine Badis, Juliet Brodie, Yuanyu Cao, Jonas Collén, Simon M. Dittami, Claire M. M. Gachon, Beverley R. Green, Steven J. Karpowicz, Jay W. Kim, Ulrich Johan Kudahl, Senjie Lin, Gurvan Michel, Maria Mittag, Bradley J. S. C. Olson, Jasmyn L. Pangilinan, Yi Peng, Huan Qiu, Shengqiang Shu, John T. Singer, View ORCID ProfileAlison G. Smith, Brittany N. Sprecher, Volker Wagner, Wenfei Wang, Zhi-Yong Wang, Juying Yan, Charles Yarish, Simone Zäuner-Riek, Yunyun Zhuang, Yong Zou, Erika A. Lindquist, Jane Grimwood, Kerrie W. Barry, Daniel S. Rokhsar, Jeremy Schmutz, John W. Stiller, Arthur R. Grossman, and Simon E. Prochnik
  1. aSchool of Marine Sciences, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469;
  2. bDepartment of Molecular Biology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071;
  3. cSorbonne Universités, Université Pierre and Marie Curie Paris 06, CNRS, UMR 8227, Integrative Biology of Marine Models, Station Biologique de Roscoff, CS 90074, 29688 Roscoff, France;
  4. dMarine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, Plymouth, PL1 2PB, United Kingdom;
  5. eInstitut für Molekulare Physiologie, Pflanzenbiochemie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, 55128 Mainz, Germany;
  6. fDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, South Bend, IN 46556;
  7. gHudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL 35806;
  8. hDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94598;
  9. iBiology Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973;
  10. jDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EA, United Kingdom;
  11. kInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia;
  12. lSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia;
  13. mDivision of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506;
  14. nDepartment of Ecology, Evolution & Natural Resources, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901;
  15. oDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824;
  16. pScottish Association for Marine Sciences, Scottish Marine Institute, Oban PA37 1QA, United Kingdom;
  17. qNatural History Museum, Department of Life Sciences, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom;
  18. rDepartment of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC, Canada V6T 1Z4;
  19. sTau Biosciences LLC, Edmond, OK 73003;
  20. tDepartment of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064;
  21. uDepartment of Marine Sciences, University of Connecticut, Groton, CT 06340;
  22. vInstitut für Allgemeine Botanik und Pflanzenphysiologie, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, 07743 Jena, Germany;
  23. wDepartment of Molecular & Biomedical Science, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469;
  24. xBasic Forestry and Proteomics Research Center, HIST, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China;
  25. yDepartment of Plant Science, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, CA 94305;
  26. zDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Stamford, CT 06901;
  27. aaInstitute of Molecular Physiology and Biotechnology, University of Bonn, 53115 Bonn, Germany;
  28. bbDepartment of Biology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS August 1, 2017 114 (31) E6361-E6370; first published July 17, 2017; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1703088114
Susan H. Brawley
aSchool of Marine Sciences, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Brawley@maine.edu
Nicolas A. Blouin
aSchool of Marine Sciences, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469;
bDepartment of Molecular Biology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY 82071;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth Ficko-Blean
cSorbonne Universités, Université Pierre and Marie Curie Paris 06, CNRS, UMR 8227, Integrative Biology of Marine Models, Station Biologique de Roscoff, CS 90074, 29688 Roscoff, France;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Glen L. Wheeler
dMarine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, Plymouth, PL1 2PB, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin Lohr
eInstitut für Molekulare Physiologie, Pflanzenbiochemie, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, 55128 Mainz, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Holly V. Goodson
fDepartment of Chemistry & Biochemistry, University of Notre Dame, South Bend, IN 46556;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jerry W. Jenkins
gHudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL 35806;
hDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94598;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Crysten E. Blaby-Haas
iBiology Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katherine E. Helliwell
dMarine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, Plymouth, PL1 2PB, United Kingdom;
jDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EA, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cheong Xin Chan
kInstitute for Molecular Bioscience, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia;
lSchool of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tara N. Marriage
mDivision of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Debashish Bhattacharya
nDepartment of Ecology, Evolution & Natural Resources, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Debashish Bhattacharya
Anita S. Klein
oDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yacine Badis
pScottish Association for Marine Sciences, Scottish Marine Institute, Oban PA37 1QA, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juliet Brodie
qNatural History Museum, Department of Life Sciences, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuanyu Cao
oDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jonas Collén
cSorbonne Universités, Université Pierre and Marie Curie Paris 06, CNRS, UMR 8227, Integrative Biology of Marine Models, Station Biologique de Roscoff, CS 90074, 29688 Roscoff, France;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simon M. Dittami
cSorbonne Universités, Université Pierre and Marie Curie Paris 06, CNRS, UMR 8227, Integrative Biology of Marine Models, Station Biologique de Roscoff, CS 90074, 29688 Roscoff, France;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Claire M. M. Gachon
pScottish Association for Marine Sciences, Scottish Marine Institute, Oban PA37 1QA, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Beverley R. Green
rDepartment of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC, Canada V6T 1Z4;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven J. Karpowicz
sTau Biosciences LLC, Edmond, OK 73003;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jay W. Kim
tDepartment of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ulrich Johan Kudahl
jDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EA, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Senjie Lin
uDepartment of Marine Sciences, University of Connecticut, Groton, CT 06340;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gurvan Michel
cSorbonne Universités, Université Pierre and Marie Curie Paris 06, CNRS, UMR 8227, Integrative Biology of Marine Models, Station Biologique de Roscoff, CS 90074, 29688 Roscoff, France;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria Mittag
vInstitut für Allgemeine Botanik und Pflanzenphysiologie, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, 07743 Jena, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bradley J. S. C. Olson
mDivision of Biology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jasmyn L. Pangilinan
hDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94598;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yi Peng
hDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94598;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Huan Qiu
nDepartment of Ecology, Evolution & Natural Resources, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shengqiang Shu
hDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94598;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John T. Singer
wDepartment of Molecular & Biomedical Science, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alison G. Smith
jDepartment of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EA, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Alison G. Smith
Brittany N. Sprecher
uDepartment of Marine Sciences, University of Connecticut, Groton, CT 06340;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Volker Wagner
vInstitut für Allgemeine Botanik und Pflanzenphysiologie, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, 07743 Jena, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wenfei Wang
xBasic Forestry and Proteomics Research Center, HIST, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhi-Yong Wang
yDepartment of Plant Science, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, CA 94305;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juying Yan
hDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94598;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charles Yarish
zDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Stamford, CT 06901;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simone Zäuner-Riek
aaInstitute of Molecular Physiology and Biotechnology, University of Bonn, 53115 Bonn, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yunyun Zhuang
uDepartment of Marine Sciences, University of Connecticut, Groton, CT 06340;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yong Zou
vInstitut für Allgemeine Botanik und Pflanzenphysiologie, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, 07743 Jena, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erika A. Lindquist
hDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94598;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jane Grimwood
gHudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL 35806;
hDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94598;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kerrie W. Barry
hDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94598;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel S. Rokhsar
hDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94598;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeremy Schmutz
gHudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology, Huntsville, AL 35806;
hDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94598;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John W. Stiller
bbDepartment of Biology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arthur R. Grossman
yDepartment of Plant Science, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, CA 94305;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Simon E. Prochnik
hDepartment of Energy, Joint Genome Institute, Walnut Creek, CA 94598;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  1. Edited by Stephen R. Palumbi, Stanford University, Pacific Grove, CA, and approved June 6, 2017 (received for review February 22, 2017)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Significance

Fossil evidence shows that red algae (Rhodophyta) are one of the most ancient multicellular lineages. Their ecological, evolutionary, and commercial importance notwithstanding, few red algal nuclear genomes have been sequenced. Our analyses of the Porphyra umbilicalis genome provide insights into how this macrophyte thrives in the stressful intertidal zone and into the basis for its nutritional value as human food. Many of the novel traits (e.g., cytoskeletal organization, calcium signaling pathways) we find encoded in the Porphyra genome are extended to other red algal genomes, and our unexpected findings offer a potential explanation for why the red algae are constrained to small stature relative to other multicellular lineages.

Abstract

Porphyra umbilicalis (laver) belongs to an ancient group of red algae (Bangiophyceae), is harvested for human food, and thrives in the harsh conditions of the upper intertidal zone. Here we present the 87.7-Mbp haploid Porphyra genome (65.8% G + C content, 13,125 gene loci) and elucidate traits that inform our understanding of the biology of red algae as one of the few multicellular eukaryotic lineages. Novel features of the Porphyra genome shared by other red algae relate to the cytoskeleton, calcium signaling, the cell cycle, and stress-tolerance mechanisms including photoprotection. Cytoskeletal motor proteins in Porphyra are restricted to a small set of kinesins that appear to be the only universal cytoskeletal motors within the red algae. Dynein motors are absent, and most red algae, including Porphyra, lack myosin. This surprisingly minimal cytoskeleton offers a potential explanation for why red algal cells and multicellular structures are more limited in size than in most multicellular lineages. Additional discoveries further relating to the stress tolerance of bangiophytes include ancestral enzymes for sulfation of the hydrophilic galactan-rich cell wall, evidence for mannan synthesis that originated before the divergence of green and red algae, and a high capacity for nutrient uptake. Our analyses provide a comprehensive understanding of the red algae, which are both commercially important and have played a major role in the evolution of other algal groups through secondary endosymbioses.

  • cytoskeleton
  • calcium-signaling
  • carbohydrate-active enzymes
  • stress tolerance
  • vitamin B12

The red algae are one of the founding groups of photosynthetic eukaryotes (Archaeplastida) and among the few multicellular lineages within Eukarya. A red algal plastid, acquired through secondary endosymbiosis, supports carbon fixation, fatty acid synthesis, and other metabolic needs in many other algal groups in ways that are consequential. For example, diatoms and haptophytes have strong biogeochemical effects; apicomplexans cause human disease (e.g., malaria); and dinoflagellates include both coral symbionts and toxin-producing “red tides” (1). The evolutionary processes that produced the Archaeplastida and secondary algal lineages remain under investigation (2⇓⇓–5), but it is clear that both nuclear and plastid genes from the ancestral red algae have contributed dramatically to broader eukaryotic evolution and diversity. Consequently, the imprint of red algal metabolism on the Earth’s climate system, aquatic foodwebs, and human health is immense. Moreover, the oldest taxonomically resolved multicellular eukaryote in the fossil record (1.2 Ga) is the bangiophyte red alga Bangiomorpha, which closely resembles the extant marine alga Bangia (6). As is typical of most bangiophytes, Porphyra grows in one of Earth’s most physically stressful habitats, the intertidal zone, where organisms are exposed to daily and seasonally fluctuating temperatures, high levels of irradiance (including UV), and severe osmotic stress and desiccation. Porphyra and its ancestors have competed successfully in this dynamic and severe environment for over a billion years, through numerous changes in climate and mass extinctions.

Here we describe the genome of Porphyra umbilicalis. Examination of the Porphyra genome and complete genomes of other red algae [Chondrus crispus (7), Cyanidioschyzon merolae (8), Galdieria sulphuraria (9), Porphyridium purpureum (10), Pyropia yezoensis (11)] revealed numerous additional differences between the red algae and other eukaryotic lineages, including a reduced complement of motor proteins, unique signaling molecules, and augmented stress tolerance mechanisms, especially in Porphyra.

Results and Discussion

Genomic Analysis.

An 87.7-Mbp assembly of the P. umbilicalis (hereafter, Porphyra) nuclear genome was generated from PacBio whole-genome shotgun sequencing, with insertions and deletions corrected using Illumina whole-genome shotgun reads (SI Appendix, Methods). The Porphyra genome has a substantial repeat component (43.9%) for a compact genome, with the most common repeat classes being DNA (15.5 Mbp) and LTR (14.9 Mbp) elements (SI Appendix, Table S5). Gene models were predicted at 13,125 loci using de novo gene prediction algorithms supported by evidence from protein homology and expression data (SI Appendix, Table S6). A typical gene has ∼two exons, implying abundant splicing for a red alga; however, only 235 alternative splice-forms were identified from expressed sequence tag coverage of genes (SI Appendix, Table S6). Overall, the genome is 65.8% G+C, but protein-coding regions average 72.9% and reach up to 94% G+C (SI Appendix, Fig. S7). Nearly 98% of the sequenced transcripts (expressed sequence tags) can be mapped to the genome assembly, and we identified complete complements of genes encoding RNA polymerase subunits and all other conserved proteins involved in transcription, translation, and DNA synthesis (SI Appendix, Table S10), suggesting that the genome is nearly complete.

Phylogenomic analysis (12) of the red algae (Rhodophyta) distinguishes a class (Cyanidiophyceae) of extremophilic unicellular species and two sister clades of mesophilic species, which we refer to here as the SCRP (Stylonematophyceae, Compsopogonophyceae, Rhodellophyceae, Porphyridiophyceae) and the BF (Bangiophyceae, Florideophyceae) (SI Appendix, Fig. S11). The SCRP clade contains unicells, microscopic filaments, and microscopic blades, whereas the BF clade holds macrophytes (“seaweeds”) that comprise the majority of described species (13). Phylogenomic comparisons of Bangiophyceae (e.g., P. umbilicalis, P. yezoensis) and Florideophyceae (e.g., C. crispus, Calliarthron tuberculosum) suggest that these two red algal classes are highly diverged (SI Appendix, Fig. S12). The absence of some pathways and genes from red algae is likely because of genomic reduction in the red algal ancestor (4), and we confirmed that Porphyra lacks genes described previously as lost in other red algae, including those encoding enzymes of the glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor biosynthesis pathway (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes map00563, 22 genes), autophagy proteins (KO pathway ko04140, 17 genes), and most flagellar proteins (4).

Cytoskeleton.

The cytoskeleton of red algae is poorly characterized, despite the long-recognized absence of flagella from the red algae (14, 15). Nuclear-associated organelles that lack centrioles appear to organize the mitotic spindle (1), and freeze-substitution reveals cytoplasmic microtubules and bundles of actin microfilaments (16). Cytoskeletal inhibitors and fluorescent probes (e.g., FITC-phalloidin for microfilaments) demonstrate that actin microfilaments form cortical rings during cytokinesis and during sperm/egg fusion, ensheath migrating secretory vesicles and organelles, and are prominently labeled in amoeboid red algal spores (17⇓⇓⇓–21). Certainly the composition of the red algal cytoskeleton must determine many of the capabilities and limitations of red algae because of the fundamental roles the cytoskeleton plays in intracellular transport, secretion of cell wall materials, regulation of cell size and shape, and responses to developmental and environmental signals that influence cell polarity and complex tissue development in many eukaryotes (22, 23). Here we report that Porphyra and other red algae have significantly reduced cytoskeletons and consider the consequences for size and complexity.

We identified four closely related actin genes in Porphyra, as well as the chromatin remodeling, actin-related protein Arp4, but no other Arp proteins (SI Appendix, Table S15). The lack of the dynactin complex Arp1 is consistent with loss of a dynein motor, but the general absence of Arp2/Arp3 from red algae is surprising. In eukaryotes, Arp2/3 nucleates the formation of branched microfilaments that mediate amoeboid motion (22), which is observed in many types of red algal spores, including Porphyra neutral spores (24) and Pyropia pulchella archeospores (21). How these spores move without Arp2/3 is an intriguing question; perhaps they rapidly polymerize microfilaments with the aid of other nucleating machinery, such as formins (22), which are present. However, although formins in many animals, fungi, and plants are members of expanded gene families that have been differentiated to support processes required to build complex morphologies (e.g., polarized tip growth and cell plate orientation) (25, 26), Porphyra has only two formins (SI Appendix, Table S15). In addition to formins, Porphyra and other red algae (SI Appendix, Tables S15 and S16) contain profilin, which interacts with formins; cofilin, a key depolymerizing factor; and severin, which cuts microfilaments to promote remodeling. However, we did not find other well-conserved, widely distributed actin-modifying proteins (e.g., WASP/WAVE, CapZ, fimbrin) in Porphyra, and few if any convincing homologs in other red algae (SI Appendix, Table S16). The most striking limitation to microfilament-mediated phenomena in Porphyra and most other red algae is the absence of myosin. Myosin genes were not detected in any of the available genomes of the BF clade (Fig. 1), and only nonspecific (27) myosin inhibitors (2,3-Butanedione monoxime) were used previously (e.g., ref. 21) to infer myosin activity. We do find that the single myosin annotated previously (9) in the extremophile Galdieria, but absent from Cyanidioschyzon (8), is also found in three classes of the SCRP clade, but not in Porphyridiophyceae (Fig. 1 and SI Appendix, Fig. S17).

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Distribution of cytoskeletal motor proteins (kinesin, cytoplasmic dynein, and myosin) in red algae compared with other select groups of Eukarya, showing the reduced cytoskeletal capacity of red algal cells. Standard motor family nomenclatures for dyneins (104), kinesins (105), and myosins (106) are used; for example, kinesins K1, K2, and K3 are cytoskeletal motors that move organelles and vesicles in many eukaryotes. Footnotes: *This may be a contaminating sequence. †The Saccharomyces dynein complex has lost much of the functionality found in other organisms (104). ‡Additional, flagellar-related dynein HC are not shown and are absent in red algae and many plants. §Myosins M8 and M11 are vesicle transporters in plants. ¶Galdieria and SCR members of the SCRP clade (SI Appendix, Fig. S11) have a myosin similar to myosin 27 of apicomplexans.

We found that the Porphyra genome encodes the expected α- and β-tubulin proteins, as well as some proteins related to tubulin folding (e.g., Porphyra contains cofactors B and D, but not A or E) and microtubule nucleation (e.g., γ-tubulin, γ-complex proteins) (SI Appendix, Tables S15 and S16). However, many of the expected tubulin regulatory proteins that are widely distributed across eukaryotes and even found in other red algae are missing. For example, Porphyra contains EB1 and Mor1/XMAP215, two highly conserved proteins of the MT plus-end tracking (+TIP) complex, but the +TIP CLASP and the cross-linker MAP65 appear absent, even though these highly conserved genes are present in other red algae (SI Appendix, Table S16). Unknown as yet is whether Porphyra simply lacks these activities, or has recruited other proteins to fill their roles. Porphyra and other red algae lost flagellar and cytoplasmic dynein motors, intermediate chains, and most light chains. A dynein heavy chain reported from C. crispus might be from a contaminant or horizontal gene transfer (SI Appendix, Table S16). Porphyra and other red algae retain a particular light chain that is also conserved in flowering plants, which independently lost flagellar motility (SI Appendix, Table S16). This dynein light chain is expressed under abiotic stress and phytohormone treatments in plants (28); thus, it may have a role in the stress tolerance of Porphyra. In contrast to the loss of the dynein motor, Porphyra does have representatives of several kinesin motor subfamilies, specifically kinesins 5, 7, and 14, which are expected to be involved in spindle assembly, kinetochore function, and regulation of microtubule dynamics, respectively (Fig. 1 and SI Appendix, Fig. S18 and Tables S15 and S16). Porphyra also contains three divergent kinesins that usually group with the mitotic motor kinesin 13. However, classic vesicle transport motors (kinesin subfamilies 1, 2, and 3) appear to be absent in Porphyra, which is particularly surprising considering the apparent loss of myosins and dyneins.

Given the surprising paucity of motors, how do Porphyra cells accomplish intracellular transport of membranes or other cargo? One answer may be provided by the observation that the “mitotic” motor kinesin 14 (present in all sequenced red algae, see Fig. 1) can act as a minus-end directed transporter in land plants (reviewed by refs. 29 and 30). In addition, a few red algae do contain members of the kinesin 4 subfamily (Fig. 1), which are reported to be plus-end directed microtubule vesicle motors in plants (31). However, Porphyra and most other sequenced red algae lack this protein. Thus, unless kinesin 5 or kinesin 7 has unexpected functionality, Porphyra and the majority of red algae (BF clade) would also apparently lack a plus-end directed kinesin-microtubule motor system. Taken together, these data show that the paucity of motors explains the absence of cell streaming from red algae including Porphyra.

One counterpoint to the frequent absence of near-ubiquitous cytoskeletal proteins is that Porphyra does have two septins (SI Appendix, Tables S15 and S16), filament-forming proteins that are involved in cytokinesis, cell polarity, and membrane remodeling (22, 23). Regardless, our overall analysis of Porphyra and other red algae with sequenced nuclear genomes [Chondrus (7), Cyanidioschyzon (8), Galdieria (9), Porphyridium (10), Pyropia (11)] indicates that the red algal cytoskeleton lacks the complexity and diversity of cytoskeletal elements present in other multicellular lineages (Fig. 1). Although it is possible that regulatory proteins are simply too divergent to recognize, the paucity of motors is especially apparent. We suggest that this observation could help to explain long-standing questions about morphological evolution in the red algae, including the lack of parenchyma in these organisms. Compared with other multicellular lineages (green algae/plants, brown algae, fungi, animals), the abilities to form large cells and large multicellular structures appear to be limited in the red algae. For example, the largest cells in Porphyra are found in its holdfast, which is composed of thousands of thread-like, slow-growing rhizoid cells that are millimeters long, and some species of Griffithsia (32), which is a subtidal florideophyte, have cells ∼2-mm long. In contrast, large cells filling special niches or functions evolved in multiple freshwater and marine green algae, including coenocytes (1), as germinating pollen tubes in land plants (33), as sporangiophores in fungi (34), as nerve cells in animals (35), and as sieve elements in brown algae (36). Maintenance of large cells would be expected to require vigorous multidirectional intracellular transport, which seems unlikely with a motor repertoire as limited as that seen in Porphyra and the other red algae with sequenced genomes (Fig. 1).

Similarly, brown algae (46-m kelps) (36), animals, and plants assemble large, complex 3D body plans with true parenchyma, but multicellular forms of red algae mostly consist of simple filaments or filaments interwoven and tacked together by secondary pit plugs (1) (i.e., pseudoparenchyma). Red algae are usually ≤50-cm long and only a few species reach 2 m in length (36, 37). Fungi cannot make parenchyma, but saprophytic mycelia grow to ≥50-m length (38). Failure of the red algae to form large multicellular structures is not straightforwardly attributed to cytoskeletal limitations; however, plants, which retain two motors (myosin, kinesin) despite their independent loss of dynein, suffer serious stunting and other developmental abnormalities following gene knockouts of myosins (23, 39). Analysis of major transcriptional and developmental regulators does not offer a compelling explanation for why red algae have failed to evolve tissues comparable to those in brown algae, plants, and animals (40). Taken together, our comparative analysis of the genomes of Porphyra and other red algae leads us to speculate that the small number of cytoskeletal elements in red algae compared with those in other multicellular lineages (Fig. 1) has constrained the ability of red algae to develop larger, more complex cells and multicellular structures.

Stress.

The ecological success of Porphyra and many of the closely related bangiophyceans (37, 41) in the intertidal zone suggests that these species developed cellular mechanisms to cope with this harsh environment. In particular, Porphyra grows from the mid-to-high intertidal zone, where it is routinely exposed during daily low tides to high light, desiccation, and extreme fluctuations in temperature and salinity. Blades can lose up to 95% of their water on some days, but are metabolically active as soon as they are rehydrated by the rising tide (24). Here we infer novel adaptations to cope with these stresses.

Photoprotection.

Light is required for photosynthesis, but severe cellular damage can result from exposure of photosynthetic organisms to the high levels of light (visible and UV) that are present in the mid-to-high intertidal zone where most bangiophycean algae, including Porphyra, grow. Porphyra has the same complement of genes (SI Appendix, Table S19) to carry out photosynthesis as other red algae, but exhibits a notable set of photoprotection strategies. Among the 13 genes encoding chlorophyll a-binding light-harvesting complex proteins are two “RedCap” genes (42), which may be involved in reorganization of the photosynthetic antenna during the shift from darkness to light (43). Porphyra also has 11 genes encoding “high light-induced” or “one-helix” proteins (here OHPs) that have essential roles for photoacclimation and cell viability under stressful environmental conditions (43, 44). Mechanistically, OHPs may regulate chlorophyll and tetrapyrrole biosynthesis, stabilize photosystem I (PSI), bind free chlorophyll or chlorophyll-breakdown products from damaged PSII complexes during the damage/repair cycle, or bind carotenoids that dissipate excess absorbed light energy. In contrast to the 11 Porphyra OHPs (SI Appendix, Table S19), we found 4 OHPs in Chondrus, which experiences less drying and light stress because of its low intertidal/subtidal habitat, 6 in P. yezoensis, 7 in Porphyridium, and only 1 OHP in Cyanidioschyzon, which inhabits a stable hotspring environment (SI Appendix, Photosynthesis, Photoprotection, Stress Genes). More analysis is needed, but the putative gene family expansion in Porphyra suggests positive selection for increased gene dosage. Porphyra was one of the first organisms where quenching of excess excitation energy in response to desiccation stress was observed (44), but the molecular mechanisms responsible for this quenching in red algae remain unclear.

Porphyra encodes genes for catalases and peroxidases, as well as the biosynthesis of numerous antioxidants, such as ascorbic acid (vitamin C) and tocopherol (vitamin E) (SI Appendix, Tables S20–S22). When overexcitation of photosynthetic electron transport occurs and reactive oxygen is generated, catalase detoxifies hydrogen peroxide in red algae, and the expansion of the catalase gene family in Porphyra and Pyropia (five genes) (SI Appendix, Table S21) compared with other red algae (one to two genes) could reflect the demand for detoxification of reactive oxygen species that cannot diffuse away from blades exposed by the falling tide to high light and air while they are still hydrated and photosynthetically active. Tocopherols prevent photooxidative damage of polyunsaturated fatty acids (45), and the Porphyra γ-tocopherol methyl transferase (SI Appendix, Table S22) catalyzes synthesis of α- and β-tocopherol. The isomer composition is unknown, but α-tocopherol has been identified in Porphyra blades and is considered the more potent antioxidant (46, 47). The 32 heat shock proteins (Hsp) in Porphyra indicate a possible expansion of the Hsp40 family (SI Appendix, Table S20), which are cochaperones of Hsp70 and play an important role in protein maturation and repair under normal and stressed conditions (48, 49).

Porphyra is frequently exposed to elevated intensities of UV radiation in the intertidal zone and shows remarkable tolerance to both UV-A and UV-B (50, 51). Porphyra has at least two strategies to protect photosynthesis and other key cellular processes from UV damage: mycosporine-like amino acids (MAAs) and circadian control over the timing of UV-sensitive processes.

MAAs act as “sunscreens” and comprise up to 1% of the dry weight of Porphyra, with the compound porphyra-334 being the major MAA (51). Four proteins—MysA, MysB, MysC, and MysD—support the biosynthesis of the MAA shinorine in cyanobacteria, such as Nostoc (52, 53), whereas MysD is replaced by a nonribosomal peptide synthase in Anabaena (Fig. 2). Cyanobacterial MysD shows a relaxed substrate specificity, with condensation of threonine instead of serine onto mycosporine-glycine to yield porphyra-334 (53). The Porphyra genome contains a gene encoding a MysA and MysB protein fusion that is also found in several other red algae that synthesize MAAs, as well as in some dinoflagellates, which were proposed to have acquired the still separate but neighboring genes from a cyanobacterium (54) (Fig. 2 and SI Appendix, Figs. S23 and S24). The presence of the MysA–MysB fusion in red algae suggests that dinoflagellates could have acquired these genes from red algae through secondary or serial endosymbiosis (54) (SI Appendix, Fig. S23). Moreover, Porphyra and related species contain a gene encoding a MysC–MysD fusion protein, and in the Porphyra genome the MysA–MysB and MysC–MysD fusion genes are next to each other but transcribed on opposite DNA strands with adjacent 5′-ends (Fig. 2). Although the Chondrus genome also contains clustered MysA–MysB and MysC–MysD, the fusion proteins are encoded on opposite strands with the 3′-ends of the genes adjacent. Conservation of the MAA gene cluster in Porphyra and Chondrus and the two gene-fusion events suggest that this arrangement provides a selective advantage and efficient MAA biosynthesis for red algae that experience high UV irradiance.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Conserved gene clusters involved in MAA biosynthesis in P. umbilicalis and related red algae. (A) Biosynthetic pathway from sedoheptulose 7-phosphate to shinorine in cyanobacteria and proposed pathway to porphyra-334 in red algae. (B) Comparison of gene clusters and gene fusions in the cyanobacteria Anabaena and Nostoc and the red algae P. umbilicalis and C. crispus.

Developmental and abiotic stress responses are often associated with photoreceptors in eukaryotes. The plant circadian clock contains blue- and red-light photoreceptors, including cryptochromes (CRY) and phytochromes (PHY), to entrain the circadian clock (55, 56); these photoreceptors are also involved in other fundamental processes in plants, including growth and development. Porphyra does not appear to encode a PHY photoreceptor or a typical plant CRY photoreceptor, although it has maintained four genes of the CRY/photolyase family. The Porphyra CRY that is most like plant CRYs is similar to a DNA photolyase (PHR2) (SI Appendix, Fig. 27 and Table S26) (57). In contrast, other red algae seem to encode plant CRYs; however, these group closely to the cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer class III photolyases (58) in some cases (SI Appendix, Fig. S27). Porphyra also encodes a class II cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer photolyase (Pum0022s0035.1) as well as a CRY-DASH protein (59) (Pum2644s0001.1) in a separate subfamily of CRYs that displays DNA repair activity; these proteins are present from bacteria to vertebrates (59). In addition, there is an animal-like CRY (Pum0401s0002.1) encoded on the Porphyra genome (SI Appendix, Fig. S27). Animal-like CRYs could function as blue-light photoreceptors associated with the entrainment of the circadian clock, as they do in Drosophila and some other insects, or could even add an oscillatory component to the clock, as in mouse or humans (59). The animal-like CRY in Porphyra is closely affiliated with the cryptochrome photolyase family (e.g., Ostreococcus tauri, Phaeodactylum tricornutum in SI Appendix, Fig. S27), which has maintained photolyase activity (60, 61), in contrast to other plant and animal-like CRYs. Moreover, cryptochrome photolyase family CRY can affect transcriptional activity in a heterologous clock system (e.g., mammalian CRY) and control blue-light–dependent cellular processes, as found with insect or plant CRYs (60, 61). Similar to the Chlamydomonas reinhardtii animal-like CRY (aCRY), the Pum0401s0002.1 protein could sense blue light and possibly other light qualities, including red light (62, 63); this red-light sensing ability stems from the formation of the neutral radical form of the photoreceptor’s flavin chromophore.

Signaling and Homeostasis.

Porphyra must cope with significant osmotic and ionic stress in the intertidal zone. Several low molecular weight carbohydrates act as compatible solutes in red algae, including Porphyra (64⇓–66). We found enzymes encoded on the Porphyra genome that support floridoside and isofloridoside synthesis, but no evidence for digeneaside synthesis (SI Appendix, Table S31). Taurine is a likely osmolyte in Porphyra (67), and we found homologs of enzymes, such as cysteine dioxygenase, implicated in metazoan taurine biosynthesis, which suggests an ancient origin for eukaryotic biosynthesis of this amino acid derivative (SI Appendix, Table S31). Porphyra also has a wide range of ion transporters, including an unusual class of Na+/H+ exchangers that are most similar to the NhaP class of transporters from α-Proteobacteria and are distinct from the Na+/H+ exchangers previously identified in eukaryotes. Porphyra has two P2C-type Na+/K+ ATPases and a P3A H+-ATPase similar to those in land plants, suggesting Porphyra is able to energize its plasma membrane with either Na+ or H+ for secondary active transport, which could aid its survival in the intertidal zone (SI Appendix, Table S31). The Porphyra genome also contains a range of Ca2+-permeable membrane channels that could play a role in osmotic stress signaling, including two homologs of OSCA (SI Appendix, Table S31), a recently identified Ca2+ channel in land plants (68); however, the Ca2+ sensor kinases through which Porphyra senses and responds to cytosolic Ca2+ elevations appear to be distinct from land plants and, indeed, from those of all other eukaryotes.

Land plants possess two expanded families of Ca2+ sensor kinases, the Ca2+-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs) and the calcineurin B-like protein (CBL)-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs), which are activated through the binding of CBL (69, 70). The CIPKs have been characterized extensively in the green lineage (Viridiplantae), and they are present in other eukaryotes, including stramenopiles, haptophytes, and excavates, suggesting a likely origin early in eukaryotic evolution (71). Surprisingly, we found that genes encoding CIPKs and CBLs are absent from the Porphyra genome and from all other available red algal genomes and transcriptomes. The CDPKs are also absent from Porphyra and notably from other bangiophytes and florideophytes, but they are present in red algae in the SCRP clade (Fig. 3; compare SI Appendix, Fig. S11 and Table S32). Another class of Ca2+ sensor kinases, the Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinases (CAMKs), which are important in both plants and animals, are also missing in Porphyra. This finding suggests that much of the extensive network of Ca2+ sensor kinases found in other eukaryotes is absent in the red algae (Fig. 3). Whereas the Porphyra genome encodes several proteins with domains similar to the kinase domains of CAMKs, CDPKs, and CIPKs, there is no indication that these proteins are regulated by Ca2+ or Ca2+-binding proteins. Instead, we found that Porphyra possesses a class of Ca2+ sensor kinases with two to three Ca2+-binding EF-hand domains at the N terminus and a kinase domain at the C terminus (Fig. 3 and SI Appendix, Tables S32 and S33). The kinase domain from all known Ca2+ sensor kinases belongs to the CAMK group of kinases, whereas this uncharacterized protein belongs to the tyrosine kinase-like (TKL) class of kinases (72, 73). The genes encoding homologous proteins are present on many other red algal genomes, including Chondrus, Cyanidioschyzon, and Galdieria, but appear to be absent from all other characterized eukaryotic genomes. Hence, the Ca2+-dependent TKLs (CDTKLs) represent a newly recognized class of Ca2+-regulated kinases that appear to be unique to red algae (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Module structure and presence or absence of different Ca2+ sensor kinases in Porphyra and other eukaryotes: CAMK, CIPK, CDPK, CDTKL. The CDTKLs from Porphyra and other red algae represent a newly recognized family of protein kinases belonging to the TKL family that contains multiple Ca2+-binding EF hands.

The sucrose nonfermenting-1–related kinase (SnRK) family of serine/threonine kinases plays important roles at the interface between metabolic and stress signaling from fungi (yeast) to land plants (74). There are 38 SnRKs divided into three subclasses (SnRK1, -2, -3) in Arabidopsis, and the Porphyra genome encodes 31 proteins with homology to the kinase domains of Arabidopsis SnRK proteins (SI Appendix, Fig. S34). Phylogenetic analysis places the Porphyra SnRK group in two clades that include Arabidopsis SnRK1 and SnRK3/CIPK, and a third expanded clade containing 19 unique members (SI Appendix, Fig. S34). Although no Porphyra SnRKs are most similar to the SnRK2 subfamily of Arabidopsis, several members of the SnRK3/CIPK clade contain motifs similar to the C-terminal domain II of SnRK2 (SI Appendix, Fig. S34), which mediates interaction with PP2C in the abscisic acid (ABA) signaling pathway (75, 76). Furthermore, there are homologs of several ABA biosynthetic genes in Porphyra (SI Appendix, Fig. S35A), and ABA synthesis and responses to exogenous ABA are reported for Pyropia orbicularis (77). Although highly speculative, the evidence raises the possibility that the SnRK family plays important roles in stress responses including ABA-mediated responses in Porphyra. Genomic data also support the presence of ethylene-mediated regulation in Porphyra, because the Porphyra genome contains genes encoding several proteins involved in ethylene biosynthesis (SI Appendix, Fig. S35B), and ethylene was detected and shown to induce stress responses in red algae (78).

The cell cycle is regulated by dimers of cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs). Except in C. merolae, where circadian rhythms and stress responses regulate the G1/S transition (79), the red algal cell cycle is not well characterized. Results here, coupled with the earlier studies of C. merolae, show that regulation of the red algal cell cycle is similar to that of metazoans and plants (80, 81), except that we did not find cyclin D encoded in any red alga, including Porphyra (SI Appendix, Table S37). Cyclin Ds are well conserved in all other eukaryotes where they regulate the G1/S transition. The mitotic-specific cyclin A (CYCA), a known cell-cycle progression regulator, might instead function in place of D-type cyclins in red algae. We found that the glaucophyte (Archaeplastida) Cyanophora paradoxa (2) also lacks a cyclin D homolog.

Plant Defense Genes.

Bangiophyte pathogens include some oomycetes, viruses, and bacteria, and these organisms sometimes cause serious economic losses to nori aquaculture. Land plants detect pathogens via an array of cell surface pattern-recognition receptors (e.g., receptor-like kinases) and intracellular receptors (e.g., nucleotide-binding domain and leucine-rich repeat proteins) (82). We found no evidence for this higher plant type of pathogen detection, but two families of intracellular ligand-binding protein containing NB-ARC domains, and a family of potential extracellular receptors containing malectin and Ig-like fold-domains, were found in the multicellular red algal genomes (SI Appendix, Fig. S38). We also found a bangiophyte-specific family of at least three proteins harboring vWFA and C-type lectin domains (SI Appendix, Table S39); C-type lectin domains are involved in pathogen detection in some animals (83, 84).

Cell Walls.

Red algae synthesize many unique polysaccharides, such as agars that contribute to their ecological success and are of significant interest to biotechnological and industrial applications. The cells of the blade of Porphyra spp. form a nonrigid cell wall that plays an important role in osmotic acclimation by allowing dramatic changes in cell volume without plasmolysis (85, 86). The skeletal component of the cell wall of blade cells is not cellulose but partially crystalline β-1,4-linked mannan in the outer cell wall, with a highly crystalline inner layer of β-1,3-linked xylan (87, 88). We discovered two glycosyltransferase (GT2) enzymes (Fig. 4 and SI Appendix, Table S40) in Porphyra that are closely related to plant cellulose synthase-like (CSL) CSLAs (mannan synthases) and CSLCs (xyloglucan synthases) and the green algal CSLs proposed to be implicated in mannan synthesis (89, 90). These Porphyra GT2 enzymes represent excellent candidates for mannan synthases, and their discovery in Porphyra suggests that both CSLA and mannan biosynthesis originated in the last-common ancestor of green and red algae, rather than in the Viridiplantae, as previously proposed (89). These findings suggest that mannans had an ancestral function in red algae, although it appears the Florideophyceae abandoned mannans for cellulose, whereas the Bangiophyceae alternate between a mannan/xylan-based cell wall in the gametophytes and a cellulose-based cell wall in the filamentous sporophytes. The Porphyra genome has two genes encoding glycosyl hydrolases (GH) of the GH113 family, which are predicted to be β-mannanases, indicating that Porphyra has the enzymes required for both the biosynthesis and degradation of mannans present in the cell walls of the blade.

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree of GT2 showing the positions of Porphyra sequences (dark triangles) and rooted on bacterial cellulose synthase (bcsA). Red algal cellulose synthases (CESA) cluster most closely with stramenopile oomycete CESAs, whereas bangiophyte CSL enzymes are sister to a clade of green plant CSLs that includes a mannan synthase. Two red algal GT2s are related to bcsA, likely because of horizontal gene transfer. Red algal sequences lie on red branches and triangles group sequences in Viridiplantae (green), stramenopiles (brown), Cyanobacteria (turquoise), Bacteria (pink), and Amoebozoa (gray). The proteins were aligned using MAFFT with the L-INS-I algorithm and the scoring matrix Blosum62 and then manually refined with BIOEDIT. The phylogenetic tree was calculated using maximum likelihood in MEGA 6.06. See SI Appendix, Table S42 for full names and GenBank accession numbers. Bootstrap values ≥ 65% are shown at nodes.

The extracellular matrix (ECM) component of the cell wall in Porphyra is a highly hydrated agar called porphyran that limits desiccation and contributes to the flexibility of the cell wall during osmotic stress (91) (SI Appendix, Figs. S41 and S45 and Table S40). Porphyran is mainly composed of porphyranobiose but also contains varying percentages of agarobiose (92). The Porphyra genome encodes a family 2 carbohydrate sulfotransferase (ST2) that may act as a l-galactose-6-O-sulfotransferase in the biosynthesis of porphyran (SI Appendix, Table S40). After C. crispus, the closest related homologs to this red algal sulfotransferase are found in metazoans (Nematostella vectensis, sea anemones) and the closest characterized enzymes are dermatan and chondroitin 4-O-sulfotransferases; similarly, the Porphyra GT7, after the C. crispus GT7, is most similar to metazoan GT7s (Acropora digitifera, staghorn corals) and the closest characterized enzyme is chondroitin sulfate N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 2 (Homo sapiens). These findings lend support to the ancestral nature of the biosynthesis of sulfated polysaccharides in the eukaryotes. Homologous carbohydrate sulfotransferases are indeed conserved at least in metazoans, brown algae, and red algae, so were most likely present in the last-common eukaryotic ancestor (91, 93). Genes encoding carbohydrate sulfotransferases are not found in sequenced genomes of terrestrial plants and freshwater algae, but marine angiosperms have, relatively recently, readapted to the marine environment by developing an ECM containing sulfated polysaccharides through an unknown mechanism of convergent evolution (94). This speaks to the critical role of sulfated ECMs in high-salinity environments (physiological saline and seawater). The Porphyra genome encodes three GH16 enzymes that form a clade with other red algae and with the agarases and porphyranases from marine bacteria (SI Appendix, Fig. S41). These enzymes likely function in cell wall remodeling and are unknown in unicellular red algae, which supports the possible involvement of bacteria in the evolution of multicellular algae (95).

Obtaining Nutrients at High Tide.

We found that Porphyra has genes for Fe-uptake mechanisms that likely lend specificity and enable high-affinity assimilation during the narrow tidal window when blades are underwater (Fig. 5 and SI Appendix, Table S46). In addition to several putative Fe2+ transporters of the NRAMP and ZIP family proteins (which are typically broad-specificity divalent metal transporters) (96), the Porphyra genome encodes a high-affinity iron transport complex containing a permease (FTR1) and multicopper oxidase (FET3 in yeast/FOX1 in green algae) and members of the FEA and ISIP2a families. The latter are related algal-specific protein families containing secreted soluble proteins involved in iron assimilation and membrane-bound iron-uptake facilitators (97, 98). Although both iron-uptake strategies are found in microalgae, we were surprised to find FTR1 and FOX1 homologs in a macroalga, given the absence of this complex in higher plants and animals. Based on an analysis of phylogenetic distribution, FTR1 homologs are found in each of the three main Archaeplastida lineages (Viridiplantae, Glaucophyta, and Rhodophyta) but were lost after the transition to land when plants evolved true roots (Fig. 5). Other inorganic and organic nutrient uptake and conversion capabilities appear similar to those described for other red algae (e.g., Fig. 5 and SI Appendix, Fig. S51 and Tables S49, S52, and S53), except that the number of ammonium transporters (seven genes) (SI Appendix, Table S49) and intracellular copper transporters [P1B-type ATPases; six genes (MTA1-6)] (SI Appendix, Fig. S47 and Table S46) is greater in Porphyra, perhaps reflecting the metabolic demands of life in the upper intertidal zone.

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Phylogenetic profile of FTR1 and FEA/ISIP2a homologs in photosynthetic eukaryotes. Whether each organism is an alga, is multicellular, or lacks true roots is indicated with a colored square, and the presence of a FTR1 or FEA/ISIP2a homolog in that organism is indicated with a colored circle. The same color is used to highlight the cooccurrence between a trait and a gene. Among sequenced algae and plants, FTR1 homologs are only encoded in genomes of organisms that lack true roots, whereas FEA/ISIP2a homologs are only encoded by algal genomes. Multicellularity does not correlate with the presence of either protein family. The roots of Selaginella moellendorffii are morphologically and evolutionarily distinct, but share characteristics with true roots including a root cap and root hairs.

Porphyra (“laver”) and related genera (i.e., Pyropia, “nori”) are commercially important human foods based on their high mineral, protein, and vitamin content (99) (see Fig. 5 and SI Appendix, Figs. S51 and S59 and Tables S55 and S56 for related findings). No eukaryote synthesizes vitamin B12 (cobalamin), but Porphyra is a rich source of this organic micronutrient. Vitamin B12 is a required cofactor for B12-dependent methionine synthase (METH), and Porphyra encodes both METH and METE, the latter a B12-independent isoform of methionine synthase (100). Methionine synthase plays a vital role in linking the folate cycle, essential for DNA metabolism, and the methylation cycle responsible for production of S-adenosylmethionine, the universal methyl donor. The presence of METH implies that Porphyra takes up B12 from its abundant bacterial epiphytes (95), and we found that Porphyra, unlike other sequenced red algae, encodes both COBT and COBS. These enzymes are involved in remodeling cyanobacterial-produced pseudocobalamin (101) to cobalamin, the particular chemical variant of B12 that is bioactive for eukaryotic algae, and indeed humans (SI Appendix, Table S60). In Chlamydomonas, METE expression was found to be suppressed under environmentally relevant levels of heat stress, and survival was dependent upon thermally stable METH (102); the fact that Porphyra is frequently heat-stressed in its upper intertidal habitat might similarly explain why it retains both isoforms of this enzyme. Interestingly, the nutritional value of Porphyra appears to be directly related to the nutrient requirements for survival in a harsh habitat.

Summary

The red algae have long commanded attention because of the 1.2-Ga age of the multicellular bangiophytes, the unique intricacies of their life histories, and their economic importance, but genomic analysis of Porphyra sharpens our understanding of just how different the red algae are from other eukaryotes. Because the cytoskeleton is so central to growth, development, and the ability to respond to environmental signals, the paucity of cytoskeletal elements in Porphyra and other red algae is striking. Only kinesin motor proteins are universally present; dynein motors are absent, and most of the red algae, including Porphyra, appear to lack myosin. This minimal cytoskeleton offers a potential explanation for the extreme reduction in stature and complexity of red algae compared with most other multicellular lineages. The unique calcium-dependent signaling pathway further suggests that Porphyra may use distinctive mechanisms to sense and respond to its environment. Most bangiophytes including Porphyra live under harsh intertidal conditions. Our discovery of ancestral mechanisms of cell wall formation, an expanded array of UV/high-light/reactive oxygen species/thermal protection strategies, and a wealth of nutrient transporters encoded by the Porphyra genome helps to explain how these red algae have thrived for over a billion years in the pounding waves, baking sun, and drying winds of the high intertidal zone.

Methods

P. umbilicalis was isolated as an unialgal culture from a blade growing at Schoodic Point, Maine (44°20′1.68′′ N; 68°3′29.14′′ W) on April 3, 2008. This single isolate (103) was cloned by culture of progeny from its asexual neutral spores, followed by DNA extraction, and assembly of the genome from sequences produced using Illumina and Pac-Bio sequencing platforms (see SI Appendix, Methods for full details). This Whole Genome Shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under accession no. MXAK00000000. The version described in this paper is version MXAK01000000.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the anonymous reviewers and editor for their insightful and constructive suggestions. We thank Dr. Lilibeth Miranda, Charlotte C. T. Quigley, and Charlotte Royer (University of Maine) for their major assistance in maintaining cultures of the genomic strain during the project period; Drs. Joyce Longcore (University of Maine) and M. Blackwell (Louisiana State University) for discussions about fungi; Dr. Sarah Tepler Drobnitch for discussion about kelp sieve elements; and the many colleagues who provided useful discussion as participants in the Porphyra Research Coordination Network (supported by NSF RCN 0741907 [to S.H.B., A.R.G., and J.W.S.]), especially to Elisabeth Gantt (University of Maryland), an original co-PI of the NSF RSN and DOE JGI contract. The work conducted by the US Department of Energy (DOE) Joint Genome Institute, a DOE Office of Science User Facility, was supported by the Office of Science of the US DOE under Contract DE-AC02-05CH11231 (to S.H.B., E.G., A.R.G., and J.W.S.). Other major research support was provided by NSF 0929558 (to S.H.B. and A.R.G.); National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Contract NA060AR4170108 (to S.H.B.); German Research Foundation Grant Mi373/12-2 of FOR1261 (to M.M.); the French National Research Agency under IDEALG Grants ANR-10- BTBR-04-02 and 04-04 “Investissements d’avenir, Biotechnologies-Bioressources” (to J.C., E.F.-B., G.M., and S.M.D.); the New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station, Scientific Contribution No. 2694, supported by the US Department of Agriculture/National Institute of Food and Agriculture Hatch Project 1004051 (to A.S.K. and Y.C.); the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC BB/1013164/1) of the United Kingdom and European Union FP7 Marie Curie ITN Photo.Comm 317184 (to A.G.S. and K.E.H.); the Office of Biological and Environmental Research of the US DOE (C.E.B.-H.); the Connecticut Sea Grant College Program (R/A-38) and the NOAA National Marine Aquaculture Initiative (C.Y.); the NIH MCB 1244593 (to H.V.G.); NSF and NIH Grants NSF-MCB 1412738, NIH P20GM103418, and NIH P20GM103638 (to B.J.S.C.O.); NSF Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant 1247393 (to B.N.S.); the UK Natural Environment Research Council IOF Pump-priming + scheme Grant NE/L013223/1 (to C.M.M.G. and Y.B.); NOAA Contract NA14OAR4170072 (to S.H.B.); and The Great Barrier Reef Foundation, Australian Research Council (DP150101875) and a University of Queensland Early Career Researcher Grant (to C.X.C.).

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: Brawley{at}maine.edu.
  • ↵2Present address: Genetics Program, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824.

  • ↵3Present address: College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China.

  • Author contributions: S.H.B., N.A.B., D.B., S.L., C.Y., K.W.B., D.S.R., J.S., J.W.S., A.R.G., and S.E.P. designed research; S.H.B., N.A.B., E.F.-B., G.L.W., M.L., H.V.G., J.W.J., C.E.B.-H., K.E.H., C.X.C., T.N.M., D.B., A.S.K., Y.B., J.B., Y.C., J.C., S.M.D., C.M.M.G., B.R.G., S.J.K., J.W.K., U.J.K., S.L., G.M., M.M., B.J.S.C.O., J.L.P., Y.P., H.Q., S.S., A.G.S., B.N.S., V.W., W.W., Z.-Y.W., J.Y., S.Z.-R., Y. Zou, E.A.L., J.G., K.W.B., D.S.R., J.S., J.W.S., A.R.G., and S.E.P. performed research; S.H.B., N.A.B., E.F.-B., G.L.W., M.L., H.V.G., J.W.J., C.E.B.-H., K.E.H., C.X.C., D.B., S.M.D., C.M.M.G., S.J.K., G.M., H.Q., A.G.S., J.S., J.W.S., and S.E.P. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; S.H.B., N.A.B., E.F.-B., G.L.W., M.L., H.V.G., J.W.J., C.E.B.-H., K.E.H., C.X.C., T.N.M., D.B., A.S.K., Y.B., J.B., Y.C., J.C., S.M.D., C.M.M.G., B.R.G., S.J.K., J.W.K., U.J.K., S.L., G.M., M.M., B.J.S.C.O., H.Q., A.G.S., B.N.S., V.W., W.W., Z.-Y.W., S.Z.-R., Y. Zou, J.S., J.W.S., A.R.G., and S.E.P. analyzed data; S.H.B., N.A.B., S.L., J.T.S., C.Y., Y. Zhuang, and A.R.G. prepared samples; and S.H.B., N.A.B., E.F.-B., G.L.W., M.L., H.V.G., J.W.J., C.E.B.-H., K.E.H., C.X.C., T.N.M., D.B., A.S.K., Y.B., J.B., Y.C., J.C., S.M.D., C.M.M.G., B.R.G., S.J.K., J.W.K., U.J.K., S.L., G.M., M.M., B.J.S.C.O., H.Q., J.T.S., A.G.S., B.N.S., V.W., W.W., Z.-Y.W., C.Y., S.Z.-R., Y. Zhuang, Y. Zou, J.W.S., A.R.G., and S.E.P. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

  • Data deposition: The Whole Genome Shotgun project has been deposited at the DNA Data Bank of Japan/European Nucleotide Archive/GenBank (accession no. MXAK00000000). The accession no. for the chloroplast genome is MF385003.

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1703088114/-/DCSupplemental.

Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Graham LE, et al.
    (2016) Algae (LJLM Press, Madison, WI), 3rd Ed.
    .
  2. ↵
    1. Price DC, et al.
    (2012) Cyanophora paradoxa genome elucidates origin of photosynthesis in algae and plants. Science 335:843–847.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Stiller JW, et al.
    (2014) The evolution of photosynthesis in chromist algae through serial endosymbioses. Nat Commun 5:5764.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Qiu H,
    2. Price DC,
    3. Yang EC,
    4. Yoon HS,
    5. Bhattacharya D
    (2015) Evidence of ancient genome reduction in red algae (Rhodophyta). J Phycol 51:624–636.
    .
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Burki F, et al.
    (2016) Untangling the early diversification of eukaryotes: A phylogenomic study of the evolutionary origins of Centrohelida, Haptophyta and Cryptista. Proc Biol Sci 283:20152802.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Butterfield N
    (2000) Bangiomorpha pubescens n gen n sp: Implications for the evolution of sex, multicellularity, and the Mesoproterozoic/Neoproterozoic radiation of eukaryotes. Paleobiology 26:383–404.
    .
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Collén J, et al.
    (2013) Genome structure and metabolic features in the red seaweed Chondrus crispus shed light on evolution of the Archaeplastida. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:5247–5252.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Matsuzaki M, et al.
    (2004) Genome sequence of the ultrasmall unicellular red alga Cyanidioschyzon merolae 10D. Nature 428:653–657.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Schönknecht G, et al.
    (2013) Gene transfer from bacteria and archaea facilitated evolution of an extremophilic eukaryote. Science 339:1207–1210.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Bhattacharya D, et al.
    (2013) Genome of the red alga Porphyridium purpureum. Nat Commun 4:1941.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Nakamura Y, et al.
    (2013) The first symbiont-free genome sequence of marine red alga, Susabi-nori (Pyropia yezoensis). PLoS One 8:e57122.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Qiu H,
    2. Yoon HS,
    3. Bhattacharya D
    (2016) Red algal phylogenomics provides a robust framework for inferring evolution of key metabolic pathways. PLoS Curr 8:e4567.
    .
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Guiry MD
    (2012) How many species of algae are there? J Phycol 48:1057–1063.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Cole K,
    2. Sheath R
    1. Pueschel C
    (1990) Cell structure. Biology of the Red Algae, eds Cole K, Sheath R (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK), pp 7–42.
    .
  15. ↵
    1. Archibald JM,
    2. Simpson AG,
    3. Slamovits CH
    1. Yoon HS, et al.
    (2016) Rhodophyta. Handbook of the Protists, eds Archibald JM, Simpson AG, Slamovits CH (Springer International, Cham, Switzerland), pp 1–43.
    .
  16. ↵
    1. Babuka SJ,
    2. Pueschel CM
    (1998) A freeze-substitution ultrastructural study of the cytoskeleton of the red alga Antithamnion kylinii (Ceramiales). Phycologia 37:251–258.
    .
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Takahashi H, et al.
    (1998) A possible role for actin dots in the formation of the contractile ring in the ultra-micro alga Cyanidium caldarium RK-1. Protoplasma 202:91–104.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. ↵
    1. Kim GH,
    2. Kim S-H
    (1999) The role of f-actin during fertilization in the red alga Aglaothamnion oosumiense (Rhodophyta). J Phycol 35:806–814.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. ↵
    1. Wilson S, et al.
    (2002) Chloroplast rotation and morphological plasticity of the unicellular alga Rhodosorus (Rhodophyta, Stylonematales). Phycol Res 50:183–191.
    .
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Wilson SM,
    2. Pickett-Heaps JD,
    3. West JA
    (2002) Fertilization and the cytoskeleton in the red alga Bostrychia moritziana (Rhodomelaceae, Rhodophyta). Eur J Phycol 37:509–522.
    .
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Ackland JC,
    2. West JA,
    3. Pickett-Heaps J
    (2007) Actin and myosin regulate pseudopodia of Porphyra pulchella (Rhodophyta) archeospores. J Phycol 43:129–138.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. ↵
    1. Alberts B, et al.
    (2014) Molecular Biology of the Cell (Garland Science, New York), 6th Ed.
    .
  23. ↵
    1. Buchanan BB,
    2. Gruisseau W,
    3. Jones RL
    (2015) Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Plants (Wiley Blackwell, Oxford), 2nd Ed.
    .
  24. ↵
    1. Blouin NA,
    2. Brodie JA,
    3. Grossman AC,
    4. Xu P,
    5. Brawley SH
    (2011) Porphyra: A marine crop shaped by stress. Trends Plant Sci 16:29–37.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. van Gisbergen PA,
    2. Li M,
    3. Wu SZ,
    4. Bezanilla M
    (2012) Class II formin targeting to the cell cortex by binding PI(3,5)P(2) is essential for polarized growth. J Cell Biol 198:235–250.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Bezanilla M,
    2. Gladfelter AS,
    3. Kovar DR,
    4. Lee WL
    (2015) Cytoskeletal dynamics: A view from the membrane. J Cell Biol 209:329–337.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Ostap EM
    (2002) 2,3-Butanedione monoxime (BDM) as a myosin inhibitor. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 23:305–308.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Cao J,
    2. Li X,
    3. Lv Y
    (2017) Dynein light chain family genes in 15 plant species: Identification, evolution and expression profiles. Plant Sci 254:70–81.
    .
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. Li J,
    2. Xu Y,
    3. Chong K
    (2012) The novel functions of kinesin motor proteins in plants. Protoplasma 249:S95–S100.
    .
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. Jonsson E,
    2. Yamada M,
    3. Vale RD,
    4. Goshima G
    (2015) Clustering of a kinesin-14 motor enables processive retrograde microtubule-based transport in plants. Nat Plants 1:15087.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. ↵
    1. Kong Z, et al.
    (2015) Kinesin-4 functions in vesicular transport on cortical microtubules and regulates cell wall mechanics during cell elongation in plants. Mol Plant 8:1011–1023.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Goff LJ,
    2. Coleman AW
    (1987) The solution to the cytological paradox of isomorphy. J Cell Biol 104:739–748.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Krichevsky A, et al.
    (2007) How pollen tubes grow. Dev Biol 303:405–420.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Bergman K, et al.
    (1969) Phycomyces. Bacteriol Rev 33:99–157.
    .
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Smith DH
    (2009) Stretch growth of integrated axon tracts: Extremes and exploitations. Prog Neurobiol 89:231–239.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Fritsch F
    (1945) The Structure and Reproduction of the Algae (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK), Vol II, p 939.
    .
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    1. Sutherland JE, et al.
    (2011) A new look at an ancient order: Generic revision of the Bangiales (Rhodophyta). J Phycol 47:1131–1151.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  38. ↵
    1. Travadon R, et al.
    (2012) Inferring dispersal patterns of the generalist root fungus Armillaria mellea. New Phytol 193:959–969.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Peremyslov VV,
    2. Prokhnevsky AI,
    3. Dolja VV
    (2010) Class XI myosins are required for development, cell expansion, and F-Actin organization in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 22:1883–1897.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. Stiller JW, et al.
    (2012) Major developmental regulators and their expression in two closely related species of Porphyra (Rhodophyta). J Phycol 48:883–896.
    .
    OpenUrl
  41. ↵
    1. Guillemin ML, et al.
    (2016) The bladed Bangiales (Rhodophyta) of the South Eastern Pacific: Molecular species delimitation reveals extensive diversity. Mol Phylogenet Evol 94:814–826.
    .
    OpenUrl
  42. ↵
    1. Engelken J,
    2. Brinkmann H,
    3. Adamska I
    (2010) Taxonomic distribution and origins of the extended LHC (light-harvesting complex) antenna protein superfamily. BMC Evol Biol 10:233.
    .
    OpenUrlPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Sturm S, et al.
    (2013) A novel type of light-harvesting antenna protein of red algal origin in algae with secondary plastids. BMC Evol Biol 13:159.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Bose S,
    2. Herbert SK,
    3. Fork DC
    (1988) Fluorescence characteristics of photoinhibition and recovery in a sun and a shade species of the red algal genus porphyra. Plant Physiol 86:946–950.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    1. Collakova E,
    2. DellaPenna D
    (2003) The role of homogentisate phytyltransferase and other tocopherol pathway enzymes in the regulation of tocopherol synthesis during abiotic stress. Plant Physiol 133:930–940.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    1. Kamal-Eldin A,
    2. Appelqvist LA
    (1996) The chemistry and antioxidant properties of tocopherols and tocotrienols. Lipids 31:671–701.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Ferraces-Casais P, et al.
    (2011) Evaluation of bioactive compounds in fresh edible seaweeds. Food Anal Methods 5:828–834.
    .
    OpenUrl
  48. ↵
    1. Walsh P,
    2. Bursać D,
    3. Law YC,
    4. Cyr D,
    5. Lithgow T
    (2004) The J-protein family: Modulating protein assembly, disassembly and translocation. EMBO Rep 5:567–571.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    1. Liberek K,
    2. Lewandowska A,
    3. Zietkiewicz S
    (2008) Chaperones in control of protein disaggregation. EMBO J 27:328–335.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    1. Dring MJ, et al.
    (1996) Sensitivity of intertidal and subtidal red algae to UVA and UVB radiation, as monitored by chlorophyll measurements: Influence of collection depth and season and length of irradiation. Eur J Phycol 31:293–302.
    .
    OpenUrl
  51. ↵
    1. Gröninger A,
    2. Hallier C,
    3. Häder D-P
    (1999) Influence of UV radiation and visible light on Porphyra umbilicalis: photoinhibition and MAA concentration. J Appl Phycol 11:437–445.
    .
    OpenUrl
  52. ↵
    1. Balskus EP,
    2. Walsh CT
    (2010) The genetic and molecular basis for sunscreen biosynthesis in cyanobacteria. Science 329:1653–1656.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. ↵
    1. Gao Q,
    2. Garcia-Pichel F
    (2011) An ATP-grasp ligase involved in the last biosynthetic step of the iminomycosporine shinorine in Nostoc punctiforme ATCC 29133. J Bacteriol 193:5923–5928.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. ↵
    1. Waller RF,
    2. Slamovits CH,
    3. Keeling PJ
    (2006) Lateral gene transfer of a multigene region from cyanobacteria to dinoflagellates resulting in a novel plastid-targeted fusion protein. Mol Biol Evol 23:1437–1443.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Harmer SL
    (2009) The circadian system in higher plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 60:357–377.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Müller N, et al.
    (2017) A plant cryptochrome controls key features of the Chlamydomonas circadian clock and its life cycle. Plant Physiol 174:185–201.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. ↵
    1. Petersen JL,
    2. Lang DW,
    3. Small GD
    (1999) Cloning and characterization of a class II DNA photolyase from Chlamydomonas. Plant Mol Biol 40:1063–1071.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Scheerer P, et al.
    (2015) The class III cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer photolyase structure reveals a new antenna chromophore binding site and alternative photoreduction pathways. J Biol Chem 290:11504–11514.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  59. ↵
    1. Chaves I, et al.
    (2011) The cryptochromes: Blue light photoreceptors in plants and animals. Annu Rev Plant Biol 62:335–364.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    1. Coesel S, et al.
    (2009) Diatom PtCPF1 is a new cryptochrome/photolyase family member with DNA repair and transcription regulation activity. EMBO Rep 10:655–661.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  61. ↵
    1. Heijde M, et al.
    (2010) Characterization of two members of the cryptochrome/photolyase family from Ostreococcus tauri provides insights into the origin and evolution of cryptochromes. Plant Cell Environ 33:1614–1626.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    1. Beel B,
    2. Müller N,
    3. Kottke T,
    4. Mittag M
    (2013) News about cryptochrome photoreceptors in algae. Plant Signal Behav 8:e22870.
    .
    OpenUrl
  63. ↵
    1. Oldemeyer S, et al.
    (2016) Essential role of an unusually long-lived tyrosyl radical in the response to red light of the animal-like cryptochrome aCRY. J Biol Chem 291:14062–14071.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  64. ↵
    1. Karsten U,
    2. Barrow KD,
    3. King RJ
    (1993) Floridoside, L-isofloridoside, and D-isofloridoside in the red alga Porphyra columbina (seasonal and osmotic effects). Plant Physiol 103:485–491.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract
  65. ↵
    1. Pade N,
    2. Linka N,
    3. Ruth W,
    4. Weber AP,
    5. Hagemann M
    (2015) Floridoside and isofloridoside are synthesized by trehalose 6-phosphate synthase-like enzymes in the red alga Galdieria sulphuraria. New Phytol 205:1227–1238.
    .
    OpenUrl
  66. ↵
    1. Qian F, et al.
    (2015) The littoral red alga Pyropia haitanensis uses rapid accumulation of floridoside as the desiccation acclimation strategy. J Appl Phycol 27:621–632.
    .
    OpenUrl
  67. ↵
    1. Ye Y, et al.
    (2013) Metabolic phenotypes associated with high-temperature tolerance of Porphyra haitanensis strains. J Agric Food Chem 61:8356–8363.
    .
    OpenUrl
  68. ↵
    1. Yuan F, et al.
    (2014) OSCA1 mediates osmotic-stress-evoked Ca2+ increases vital for osmosensing in Arabidopsis. Nature 514:367–371.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. ↵
    1. Weinl S,
    2. Kudla J
    (2009) The CBL-CIPK Ca(2+)-decoding signaling network: Function and perspectives. New Phytol 184:517–528.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  70. ↵
    1. Edel KH,
    2. Kudla J
    (2015) Increasing complexity and versatility: How the calcium signaling toolkit was shaped during plant land colonization. Cell Calcium 57:231–246.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. ↵
    1. Beckmann L,
    2. Edel KH,
    3. Batistič O,
    4. Kudla J
    (2016) A calcium sensor-protein kinase signaling module diversified in plants and is retained in all lineages of Bikonta species. Sci Rep 6:31645.
    .
    OpenUrl
  72. ↵
    1. Hui R,
    2. El Bakkouri M,
    3. Sibley LD
    (2015) Designing selective inhibitors for calcium-dependent protein kinases in apicomplexans. Trends Pharmacol Sci 36:452–460.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  73. ↵
    1. Martin DM,
    2. Miranda-Saavedra D,
    3. Barton GJ
    (2009) Kinomer v. 1.0: A database of systematically classified eukaryotic protein kinases. Nucleic Acids Res 37:D244–D250.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. ↵
    1. Coello P,
    2. Hey SJ,
    3. Halford NG
    (2011) The sucrose non-fermenting-1-related (SnRK) family of protein kinases: Potential for manipulation to improve stress tolerance and increase yield. J Exp Bot 62:883–893.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  75. ↵
    1. Cutler SR,
    2. Rodriguez PL,
    3. Finkelstein RR,
    4. Abrams SR
    (2010) Abscisic acid: Emergence of a core signaling network. Annu Rev Plant Biol 61:651–679.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  76. ↵
    1. Xie T, et al.
    (2012) Molecular mechanism for inhibition of a critical component in the Arabidopsis thaliana abscisic acid signal transduction pathways, SnRK2.6, by protein phosphatase ABI1. J Biol Chem 287:794–802.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  77. ↵
    1. Guajardo E,
    2. Correa JA,
    3. Contreras-Porcia L
    (2016) Role of abscisic acid (ABA) in activating antioxidant tolerance responses to desiccation stress in intertidal seaweed species. Planta 243:767–781.
    .
    OpenUrl
  78. ↵
    1. Uji T, et al.
    (2016) Ethylene regulation of sexual reproduction in the marine red alga Pyropia yezoensis (Rhodophyta). J Appl Phycol 28:3501–3509.
    .
    OpenUrl
  79. ↵
    1. Kobayashi Y,
    2. Ando H,
    3. Hanaoka M,
    4. Tanaka K
    (2016) Abscisic acid participates in the control of cell cycle initiation through heme homeostasis in the unicellular red alga Cyanidioschyzon merolae. Plant Cell Physiol 57:953–960.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  80. ↵
    1. Bisova K,
    2. Krylov DM,
    3. Umen JG
    (2005) Genome-wide annotation and expression profiling of cell cycle regulatory genes in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Physiol 137:475–491.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  81. ↵
    1. Moriyama T, et al.
    (2010) Characterization of cell-cycle-driven and light-driven gene expression in a synchronous culture system in the unicellular rhodophyte Cyanidioschyzon merolae. Microbiology 156:1730–1737.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  82. ↵
    1. Dangl JL,
    2. Jones JD
    (2001) Plant pathogens and integrated defence responses to infection. Nature 411:826–833.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  83. ↵
    1. O’Rourke D,
    2. Baban D,
    3. Demidova M,
    4. Mott R,
    5. Hodgkin J
    (2006) Genomic clusters, putative pathogen recognition molecules, and antimicrobial genes are induced by infection of C. elegans with M. nematophilum. Genome Res 16:1005–1016.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  84. ↵
    1. Hollmig ST,
    2. Ariizumi K,
    3. Cruz PD Jr
    (2009) Recognition of non-self-polysaccharides by C-type lectin receptors dectin-1 and dectin-2. Glycobiology 19:568–575.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  85. ↵
    1. Reed RH,
    2. Collins JC,
    3. Russell G
    (1980) The effects of salinity upon cellular volume of the marine red alga Porphyra purpurea (Roth) C. Ag. J Exp Bot 31:1521–1537.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  86. ↵
    1. Wiencke C,
    2. Läuchli A
    (1980) Growth, cell volume, and fine structure of Porphyra umbilicalis in relation to osmotic tolerance. Planta 150:303–311.
    .
    OpenUrl
  87. ↵
    1. Baldan B, et al.
    (1995) Polysaccharide localization in the cell-wall of Porphyra leucosticta (Bangiophyceae, Rhodophyta) during the life-cycle. Bot Mar 38:31–36.
    .
    OpenUrl
  88. ↵
    1. Mukai LS,
    2. Craigie JS,
    3. Brown RG
    (1981) Chemical composition and structure of the cell walls of the conchocelis and thallus phases of Porphyra tenera (Rhodophyceae). J Phycol 17:192–198.
    .
    OpenUrl
  89. ↵
    1. Yin Y,
    2. Huang J,
    3. Xu Y
    (2009) The cellulose synthase superfamily in fully sequenced plants and algae. BMC Plant Biol 9:99.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  90. ↵
    1. Popper ZA,
    2. Tuohy MG
    (2010) Beyond the green: Understanding the evolutionary puzzle of plant and algal cell walls. Plant Physiol 153:373–383.
    .
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  91. ↵
    1. Ficko-Blean E,
    2. Hervé C,
    3. Michel G
    (2015) Sweet and sour sugars from the sea: The biosynthesis and remodeling of sulfated cell wall polysaccharides from marine macroalgae. Perspect Phycol 2:51–64.
    .
    OpenUrl
  92. ↵
    1. Rees DA,
    2. Conway E
    (1962) The structure and biosynthesis of porphyran: A comparison of some samples. Biochem J 84:411–416.
    .
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  93. ↵
    1. Michel G,
    2. Tonon T,
    3. Scornet D,
    4. Cock JM,
    5. Kloareg B
    (2010) The cell wall polysaccharide metabolism of the brown alga Ectocarpus siliculosus. Insights into the evolution of extracellular matrix polysaccharides in Eukaryotes. New Phytol 188:82–97.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  94. ↵
    1. Olsen JL, et al.
    (2016) The genome of the seagrass Zostera marina reveals angiosperm adaptation to the sea. Nature 530:331–335.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  95. ↵
    1. Miranda LN,
    2. Hutchison K,
    3. Grossman AR,
    4. Brawley SH
    (2013) Diversity and abundance of the bacterial community of the red macroalga Porphyra umbilicalis: Did bacterial farmers produce macroalgae? PLoS One 8:e58269.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  96. ↵
    1. Castaings L,
    2. Caquot A,
    3. Loubet S,
    4. Curie C
    (2016) The high-affinity metal transporters NRAMP1 and IRT1 team up to take up iron under sufficient metal provision. Sci Rep 6:37222.
    .
    OpenUrl
  97. ↵
    1. Allen MD,
    2. del Campo JA,
    3. Kropat J,
    4. Merchant SS
    (2007) FEA1, FEA2, and FRE1, encoding two homologous secreted proteins and a candidate ferrireductase, are expressed coordinately with FOX1 and FTR1 in iron-deficient Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Eukaryot Cell 6:1841–1852.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  98. ↵
    1. Morrissey J, et al.
    (2015) A novel protein, ubiquitous in marine phytoplankton, concentrates iron at the cell surface and facilitates uptake. Curr Biol 25:364–371.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  99. ↵
    1. Wells ML, et al.
    (2017) Algae as nutritional and functional food sources: Revisiting our understanding. J Appl Phycol 29:949–982.
    .
    OpenUrl
  100. ↵
    1. Helliwell KE,
    2. Wheeler GL,
    3. Leptos KC,
    4. Goldstein RE,
    5. Smith AG
    (2011) Insights into the evolution of vitamin B12 auxotrophy from sequenced algal genomes. Mol Biol Evol 28:2921–2933.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  101. ↵
    1. Helliwell KE, et al.
    (2016) Cyanobacteria and eukaryotic algae use different chemical variants of vitamin B12. Curr Biol 26:999–1008.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  102. ↵
    1. Xie B, et al.
    (2013) Chlamydomonas reinhardtii thermal tolerance enhancement mediated by a mutualistic interaction with vitamin B12-producing bacteria. ISME J 7:1544–1555.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  103. ↵
    1. Blouin NA,
    2. Brawley SH
    (2012) An AFLP analysis of clonality in widespread asexual populations of Porphyra umbilicalis (Rhodophyta) with a sensitivity analysis for bacterial contamination. Mar Biol 159:2723–2729.
    .
    OpenUrl
  104. ↵
    1. Kollmar M
    (2016) Fine-tuning motile cilia and flagella: Evolution of the dynein motor proteins from plants to humans at high resolution. Mol Biol Evol 33:3249–3267.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  105. ↵
    1. Wickstead B,
    2. Gull K,
    3. Richards TA
    (2010) Patterns of kinesin evolution reveal a complex ancestral eukaryote with a multifunctional cytoskeleton. BMC Evol Biol 10:110.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  106. ↵
    1. Odronitz F,
    2. Kollmar M
    (2007) Drawing the tree of eukaryotic life based on the analysis of 2,269 manually annotated myosins from 328 species. Genome Biol 8:R196.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Insights into the red algae and eukaryotic evolution from the genome of Porphyra umbilicalis (Bangiophyceae, Rhodophyta)
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Genome of the red alga Porphyra umbilicalis
Susan H. Brawley, Nicolas A. Blouin, Elizabeth Ficko-Blean, Glen L. Wheeler, Martin Lohr, Holly V. Goodson, Jerry W. Jenkins, Crysten E. Blaby-Haas, Katherine E. Helliwell, Cheong Xin Chan, Tara N. Marriage, Debashish Bhattacharya, Anita S. Klein, Yacine Badis, Juliet Brodie, Yuanyu Cao, Jonas Collén, Simon M. Dittami, Claire M. M. Gachon, Beverley R. Green, Steven J. Karpowicz, Jay W. Kim, Ulrich Johan Kudahl, Senjie Lin, Gurvan Michel, Maria Mittag, Bradley J. S. C. Olson, Jasmyn L. Pangilinan, Yi Peng, Huan Qiu, Shengqiang Shu, John T. Singer, Alison G. Smith, Brittany N. Sprecher, Volker Wagner, Wenfei Wang, Zhi-Yong Wang, Juying Yan, Charles Yarish, Simone Zäuner-Riek, Yunyun Zhuang, Yong Zou, Erika A. Lindquist, Jane Grimwood, Kerrie W. Barry, Daniel S. Rokhsar, Jeremy Schmutz, John W. Stiller, Arthur R. Grossman, Simon E. Prochnik
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Aug 2017, 114 (31) E6361-E6370; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1703088114

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Genome of the red alga Porphyra umbilicalis
Susan H. Brawley, Nicolas A. Blouin, Elizabeth Ficko-Blean, Glen L. Wheeler, Martin Lohr, Holly V. Goodson, Jerry W. Jenkins, Crysten E. Blaby-Haas, Katherine E. Helliwell, Cheong Xin Chan, Tara N. Marriage, Debashish Bhattacharya, Anita S. Klein, Yacine Badis, Juliet Brodie, Yuanyu Cao, Jonas Collén, Simon M. Dittami, Claire M. M. Gachon, Beverley R. Green, Steven J. Karpowicz, Jay W. Kim, Ulrich Johan Kudahl, Senjie Lin, Gurvan Michel, Maria Mittag, Bradley J. S. C. Olson, Jasmyn L. Pangilinan, Yi Peng, Huan Qiu, Shengqiang Shu, John T. Singer, Alison G. Smith, Brittany N. Sprecher, Volker Wagner, Wenfei Wang, Zhi-Yong Wang, Juying Yan, Charles Yarish, Simone Zäuner-Riek, Yunyun Zhuang, Yong Zou, Erika A. Lindquist, Jane Grimwood, Kerrie W. Barry, Daniel S. Rokhsar, Jeremy Schmutz, John W. Stiller, Arthur R. Grossman, Simon E. Prochnik
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Aug 2017, 114 (31) E6361-E6370; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1703088114
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Article Classifications

  • Biological Sciences
  • Evolution
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 114 (31)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results and Discussion
    • Summary
    • Methods
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Smoke emanates from Japan’s Fukushima nuclear power plant a few days after tsunami damage
Core Concept: Muography offers a new way to see inside a multitude of objects
Muons penetrate much further than X-rays, they do essentially zero damage, and they are provided for free by the cosmos.
Image credit: Science Source/Digital Globe.
Water from a faucet fills a glass.
News Feature: How “forever chemicals” might impair the immune system
Researchers are exploring whether these ubiquitous fluorinated molecules might worsen infections or hamper vaccine effectiveness.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Dmitry Naumov.
Venus flytrap captures a fly.
Journal Club: Venus flytrap mechanism could shed light on how plants sense touch
One protein seems to play a key role in touch sensitivity for flytraps and other meat-eating plants.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Kuttelvaserova Stuchelova.
Illustration of groups of people chatting
Exploring the length of human conversations
Adam Mastroianni and Daniel Gilbert explore why conversations almost never end when people want them to.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Horse fossil
Mounted horseback riding in ancient China
A study uncovers early evidence of equestrianism in ancient China.
Image credit: Jian Ma.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Cozzarelli Prize
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490