Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology

Americans misperceive racial economic equality

Michael W. Kraus, Julian M. Rucker, and Jennifer A. Richeson
PNAS September 26, 2017 114 (39) 10324-10331; published ahead of print September 18, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1707719114
Michael W. Kraus
aSchool of Management, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: michael.kraus@yale.edujennifer.richeson@yale.edu
Julian M. Rucker
bDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer A. Richeson
bDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520;cInstitution for Social and Policy Studies, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520;dDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208;eInstitute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: michael.kraus@yale.edujennifer.richeson@yale.edu
  1. Contributed by Jennifer A. Richeson, August 10, 2017 (sent for review May 9, 2017; reviewed by Shai Davidai and James Jones)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Significance

Race-based economic inequality is both a defining and persistent feature of the United States that is at odds with national narratives regarding progress toward racial equality. This work examines perceptions of Black–White differences in economic outcomes, both in the past and present. We find that Americans, on average, systematically overestimate the extent to which society has progressed toward racial economic equality, driven largely by overestimates of current racial equality. Notably, White Americans generated more accurate estimates of Black–White equality when asked to consider the persistence of race-based discrimination in American society. The findings suggest a profound misperception of and misplaced optimism regarding contemporary societal racial economic equality—a misperception that is likely to have important consequences for public policy.

Abstract

The present research documents the widespread misperception of race-based economic equality in the United States. Across four studies (n = 1,377) sampling White and Black Americans from the top and bottom of the national income distribution, participants overestimated progress toward Black–White economic equality, largely driven by estimates of greater current equality than actually exists according to national statistics. Overestimates of current levels of racial economic equality, on average, outstripped reality by roughly 25% and were predicted by greater belief in a just world and social network racial diversity (among Black participants). Whereas high-income White respondents tended to overestimate racial economic equality in the past, Black respondents, on average, underestimated the degree of past racial economic equality. Two follow-up experiments further revealed that making societal racial discrimination salient increased the accuracy of Whites’ estimates of Black–White economic equality, whereas encouraging Whites to anchor their estimates on their own circumstances increased their tendency to overestimate current racial economic equality. Overall, these findings suggest a profound misperception of and unfounded optimism regarding societal race-based economic equality—a misperception that is likely to have any number of important policy implications.

  • economic inequality
  • racial disparities
  • socioeconomic status
  • racial stratification
  • motivated perception

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: michael.kraus{at}yale.edu or jennifer.richeson{at}yale.edu.
  • This contribution is part of the special series of Inaugural Articles by members of the National Academy of Sciences elected in 2015.

  • Author contributions: M.W.K., J.M.R., and J.A.R. designed research; M.W.K. performed research; M.W.K. and J.M.R. analyzed data; M.W.K. and J.A.R. wrote the paper; and M.W.K. and J.A.R. interpreted results.

  • Reviewers: S.D., The New School; and J.J., University of Delaware.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • Data deposition: The materials and data for all studies are available at the Open Science Framework website, https://osf.io/vvrsr/#.

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1707719114/-/DCSupplemental.

Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.

View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Americans misperceive racial economic equality
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
Citation Tools
Racial economic inequality
Michael W. Kraus, Julian M. Rucker, Jennifer A. Richeson
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Sep 2017, 114 (39) 10324-10331; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1707719114

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Racial economic inequality
Michael W. Kraus, Julian M. Rucker, Jennifer A. Richeson
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Sep 2017, 114 (39) 10324-10331; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1707719114
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 116 (12)
Current Issue

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Status Characteristics, Motivation, and Network Diversity
    • The Present Work
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Methods and Measures
    • SI Methods and Measures
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Daven Henze discusses how air pollution spreads across the globe and what policymakers are doing in response.
Pollution across borders
Daven Henze discusses how air pollution spreads across the globe and what policymakers are doing in response.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Some researchers are aiming to apply the technique to a range of hard-to-treat maladies, including severe obsessive compulsive disorder, Tourette syndrome, and Alzheimer’s disease. Image credit: Helen Mayberg.
Core Concept: Can deep brain stimulation find success beyond Parkinson’s disease?
Some researchers are aiming to apply the technique to a range of hard-to-treat maladies, including severe obsessive compulsive disorder, Tourette syndrome, and Alzheimer’s disease.
Image credit: Helen Mayberg.
Can a computer actually produce something new rather than merely emulating human artists? If nothing else, they are making some types of art more accessible for would-be artists. Image credit: Roman Verostko (artist).
Science and Culture: Computers take art in new directions, challenging the meaning of “creativity”
Can a computer actually produce something new rather than merely emulating human artists? If nothing else, they are making some types of art more accessible for would-be artists.
Image credit: Roman Verostko (artist).
PNAS Profile of NAS member and geologist Paul E. Olsen
Featured Profile
PNAS Profile of NAS member and geologist Paul E. Olsen.
Image courtesy of Kevin Krajick (Columbia University, New York).
Fossil illuminates hagfish evolution
Fossil illuminates hagfish evolution
Fossil evidence helps address a longstanding debate on the evolution of hagfish, a jawless, marine-dwelling slime “eel,” and suggests that living jawless vertebrates may not be as primitive as their anatomy suggests.
Image courtesy of Tetsuto Miyashita.

More Articles of This Classification

Social Sciences

  • Opinion: Governing the recreational dimension of global fisheries
  • Effect of oil spills on infant mortality in Nigeria
  • Fecal stanols show simultaneous flooding and seasonal precipitation change correlate with Cahokia’s population decline
Show more

Psychological and Cognitive Sciences

  • Symbolic labeling in 5-month-old human infants
  • Large-scale analysis of test–retest reliabilities of self-regulation measures
  • Increasing population size can inhibit cumulative cultural evolution
Show more

Related Content

  • No related articles found.
  • Scopus
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited by...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Scopus (10)
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive

PNAS Portals

  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Teaching Resources
  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Site Map

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2019 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490