Origin of the RNA world: The fate of nucleobases in warm little ponds

Ben K. D. Pearce, Ralph E. Pudritz, Dmitry A. Semenov, and Thomas K. Henning
PNAS October 24, 2017 114 (43) 11327-11332; published ahead of print October 2, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1710339114

  1. Edited by Donald E. Canfield, Institute of Biology and Nordic Center for Earth Evolution, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M., Denmark, and approved August 28, 2017 (received for review June 7, 2017)

Significance

There are currently two competing hypotheses for the site at which an RNA world emerged: hydrothermal vents in the deep ocean and warm little ponds. Because the former lacks wet and dry cycles, which are well known to promote polymerization (in this case, of nucleotides into RNA), we construct a comprehensive model for the origin of RNA in the latter sites. Our model advances the story and timeline of the RNA world by constraining the source of biomolecules, the environmental conditions, the timescales of reaction, and the emergence of first RNA polymers.

Abstract

Before the origin of simple cellular life, the building blocks of RNA (nucleotides) had to form and polymerize in favorable environments on early Earth. At this time, meteorites and interplanetary dust particles delivered organics such as nucleobases (the characteristic molecules of nucleotides) to warm little ponds whose wet–dry cycles promoted rapid polymerization. We build a comprehensive numerical model for the evolution of nucleobases in warm little ponds leading to the emergence of the first nucleotides and RNA. We couple Earth’s early evolution with complex prebiotic chemistry in these environments. We find that RNA polymers must have emerged very quickly after the deposition of meteorites (less than a few years). Their constituent nucleobases were primarily meteoritic in origin and not from interplanetary dust particles. Ponds appeared as continents rose out of the early global ocean, but this increasing availability of “targets” for meteorites was offset by declining meteorite bombardment rates. Moreover, the rapid losses of nucleobases to pond seepage during wet periods, and to UV photodissociation during dry periods, mean that the synthesis of nucleotides and their polymerization into RNA occurred in just one to a few wet–dry cycles. Under these conditions, RNA polymers likely appeared before 4.17 billion years ago.

One of the most fundamental questions in science is how life first emerged on Earth. Given its ubiquity in living cells and its ability to both store genetic information and catalyze its own replication, RNA probably formed the basis of first life (1). RNA molecules are made up of sequences of four different nucleotides, the latter of which can be formed through reaction of a nucleobase with a ribose and a reduced phosphorous (P) source (2, 3). The evidence suggests that first life appeared earlier than 3.7 Gy ago (Ga) (4, 5), and thus the RNA world would have developed on a violent early Earth undergoing meteoritic bombardment at a rate of ∼1 to 1,000×1012 kg/y (6), which is ∼8 to 11 orders of magnitude greater than today (7). At that time, the atmosphere was dominated by volcanic gases, and dry land was scarce as continents were rising out of the global ocean. What was the source of the building blocks of RNA? What environments enabled nucleotides to polymerize and form the first functioning RNA molecules under such conditions? Although experiments have produced simple RNA strands in highly idealized laboratory conditions (8, 9), the answers to these questions are largely unknown.

As to the sources of nucleobases, early Earth’s atmosphere was likely dominated by CO2, N2, SO2, and H2O (10). In such a weakly reducing atmosphere, Miller–Urey-type reactions are not very efficient at producing organics (11). One solution is that the nucleobases were delivered by interplanetary dust particles (IDPs) and meteorites. During these early times, these bodies delivered ∼6× 107 and ∼2× 103kg⋅y−1 of intact carbon, respectively (11). Although nucleobases have not been identified in IDPs, three of the five nucleobases (uracil, cytosine, and thymine) have been formed on the surfaces of icy IDP analogues in the laboratory through exposure to UV radiation (12). Nucleobases are found in meteorites (guanine, adenine, and uracil) with concentrations of 0.25 to 515 parts per billion (ppb) (13, 14). The ultimate source of nitrogen within them could be molecules such as ammonia and HCN that are observed in the disks of gas and dust around all young stars (15⇓–17). A second possible source of nucleobases is synthesis in hydrothermal vents that well up from spreading cracks on young Earth’s ocean floors (18). A potential problem here is the lack of concentrated and reactive nitrogen sources in these environments (18).

A central question concerning the emergence of the RNA world is how the polymerization of nucleotides occurred. Warm little ponds (WLPs) are excellent candidate environments for this process because their wet and dry cycles have been shown to promote the polymerization of nucleotides into chains possibly greater than 300 links (8). Furthermore, clay minerals in the walls and bases of WLPs promote the linking of chains up to 55 nucleotides long (19). Conversely, experiments simulating the conditions of hydrothermal vents have only succeeded in producing RNA chains a few monomers long (20). A critical problem for polymerizing long RNA chains near hydrothermal vents is the absence of wet–dry cycles.

Model: Fates of Nucleobases in Evolving WLPs

We compute a well-posed model for the evolution of WLPs, the fates of nucleobases delivered to them, and the emergence of RNA polymers under early Earth conditions. The sources of nucleobases in our model are carbonaceous meteorites and IDPs whose delivery rates are estimated using the lunar cratering record (6, 11, 21), the distribution of asteroid masses (21), and the fraction of meteorites reaching terminal velocity that are known to be nucleobase carriers (13, 22). The WLPs are “targets” in which molecular evolution of nucleobases into nucleotides and subsequent polymerization into RNA occur. The evolution of ponds due to precipitation, evaporation, and seepage constitutes the immediate environments in which the delivered nucleobases must survive and polymerize. [We don’t emphasize groundwater-fed ponds (hot springs) because their small number on Earth today—approximately thousands—compared with regular lakes/ponds—∼304 million (23)—suggests they didn’t contribute greatly to the combined WLP target area for meteorite deposition.] The data for these sources and sinks are gathered from historical precipitation records (24), or are measured experimentally (25, 26). Sinks for these molecules include destruction by unattenuated UV rays (as early Earth had no ozone), hydrolysis in the pond water, as well as seepage from the bases of ponds. The data for these sinks are measured experimentally (26⇓–28). The nucleobases that survive go on to form nucleotides that ultimately polymerize.

To calculate the number of carbonaceous meteorite source depositions in target WLPs on early Earth, we combine a continental crustal growth model (29), the lake and pond size distribution and ponds per unit crustal area estimated for ponds on Earth today (23), the asteroid belt mass distribution (21), and three possible mass delivery models based on the lunar cratering record (6, 21). This results in a first-order linear differential equation (Eq. S18), which we solve analytically. The details are in SI Text, and the main results are discussed in Meteorite Sources and Targets.

Nucleobase abundances in WLPs from IDPs and meteorites are described in our model by first-order linear differential equations (Eqs. S34 and S38, respectively). The equations are solved numerically (see SI Text for details).

Our fiducial model WLPs are cylindrical (because sedimentation flattens their initial bases) and have a 1-m radius and depth. We find these ponds to be optimal because they are large enough to not dry up too quickly but small enough that high nucleobase concentrations can be achieved (see SI Text).

SI Text

Calculating WLP Surface Area on Early Earth

The earliest fairly conclusive evidences of life are in the form of light carbon signatures in graphite globules formed from marine sediments, and stromatolite fossils, both which are dated to be 3.7 Gy old (4, 5). Therefore, nucleobase deposition in WLPs and subsequent reactions to form nucleotides and RNA would have occurred sometime between ∼4.5 and 3.7 Ga.

Once Theia impacted the proto-Earth ∼50 My after Solar System formation, it may have only taken 10 My to 100 My for the magma mantle to cool (30). Furthermore, basic evidence (from the zircon oxygen isotope record) exists of crustal material interacting with liquid water at or near Earth’s surface since 4.3 Ga (48). Such evidence makes it clear that Earth had a hydrosphere at that point, and therefore could have formed WLPs on any rising continental crust.

An estimate of the surface area of WLPs on early Earth has not been previously attempted; however, it is often suggested that they were typical on early Earth continents (33, 44, 48). Water-deposited sediments dated at 3.8 Ga indicate early erosion and transport of sediment; therefore, at that time, at least some continental mass must have been exposed above sea level, on which WLPs could have formed (33).

Continental Crust Growth Model.

The number of WLPs present at any given time depends on the fraction of continental crust above sea level. Calculations from a continental crust growth model show a linear formation of early crust, increasing from 0 to 12.8% of today’s crustal surface area from 4.5 Ga to 3.7 Ga (29). This is expressed in the following equation:fcr=0.16t,[S1]where fcr is the fraction of today’s crustal surface area, and t is the time in gigayears (t = 0 starts at 4.5 Ga).

We assume the number of bodies of water per unit area of continental crust is constant over time; thus, by multiplying Eq. S1 by the number of lakes and ponds on Earth today, we get the number of bodies of water on Earth at any date from 4.5 Ga to 3.7 Ga. The number of lakes and ponds on Earth today (down to 0.001 km2) is estimated to be 304 million (23); therefore, the equation becomesNt=4.864×107t,[S2]where Nt is the total number of bodies of water on Earth for times 0 Gy ≤t≤ 0.8 Gy (t = 0 starts at 4.5 Ga).

Lake and Pond Size Distribution.

The size distribution of lakes and ponds on Earth today follows a Pareto distribution function (23).dNA=NtckcA−(c+1)dA,[S3]where dNA is the number of bodies of water in the square kilometer area range A to A+dA, Nt is the total number of bodies of water on Earth, c is the dimensionless shape parameter, and k is the smallest lake/pond area in the distribution. The shape parameter was calculated for lakes and ponds down to 0.001 km2 to be c = 1.06 (23).

The total area of ponds on Earth in a given size range can then be calculated by multiplying Eq. S3 by A and integrating from Amin to Amax, which givesAtot=c−c+1Ntkc[Amax(−c+1)−Amin(−c+1)] [km2].[S4]There is an upper size limit on WLPs in which substantial concentrations of nucleobases from meteorites can be deposited. If the surface area of a WLP is comparable to the area of a meteoroid’s strewnfield, then partial overlapping of the strewnfield and WLP is probable. This would lead to fewer fragment depositions per unit pond area, and lower nucleobase concentrations. For this reason, we choose the upper limit on WLP radii to be 10 m. This equates to pond areas that are <0.04% of the strewnfield area of typical carbonaceous meteoroids (the latter of which are ∼0.785 km2).

There is also a lower size limit, as ponds that evaporate too quickly spend the majority of their time in the dry state. This would prevent nucleobase outflow from the pores of meteorites. Moreover, the probability of meteorite deposition in WLPs decreases for decreasing pond radii. A cylindrical WLP at 65 °C with a radius and depth of <1 m will likely evaporate in less than 3 mo without replenishment from rain or geysers (25). Therefore, we set the lower WLP radius and depth limit for our interests at 1 m.

Total WLP Surface Area.

From Eqs. S2 and S4, the total surface area of cylindrical, 1- to 10-m-radii WLPs on early Earth at time 0 Gy ≤t≤ 0.8 Gy isAtot(t)=651t [km2].[S5]For this calculation, we choose c = 1.06 and k = 3.14 × 10−6 km2. Note that t = 0 starts at 4.5 Ga.

Calculating Carbonaceous Meteorite Depositions in WLPs

Aerodynamic forces fragment meteoroids that enter the atmosphere, which increases their total meteoroid cross-section, and thus their aerodynamic braking (32). Numerical simulations show that the fragments of carbonaceous meteoroids with initial diameters up to 80 m and atmospheric entry velocities near the median value [15 km/s (31)] reach terminal velocity (32). These fragments do not produce craters upon impact (49) and can be intactly deposited into WLPs. Larger meteoroids produce fragments with impact speeds too fast to avoid cratering and partial or complete melting or vaporization of the impactor. The same numerical simulations calculate the largest fragments from an 80-m-diameter carbonaceous meteoroid of initial velocity 15 km/s to be ∼20 cm in diameter (32). [This roughly makes sense, as the biggest carbonaceous meteorite recovered, the Allende, is only 110 kg—corresponding to a ∼40-cm-diameter sphere (50).]

The optimal diameter range for carbonaceous meteoroids to deposit a substantial fraction of mass into WLPs at terminal velocity is therefore 40 m to 80 m. We base our calculation of carbonaceous meteoroid fragment depositions on this range.

Mass Delivery Models.

The lunar cratering record analyzed by the Apollo program has revealed a period of intense lunar bombardment from ∼3.9 Ga to 3.8 Ga (51). Whether a single lunar cataclysm (lasting ∼10 My to 150 My) or a sustained declining bombardment preceded 3.9 Ga is still debated (30). We choose three models for the rate of mass delivered to early Earth: an LHB model, and a minimum and a maximum bombardment model. All models are based on analyses of the lunar cratering record (6, 21).

Analyses from both dynamic modeling and the lunar cratering record estimate the total mass delivered to early Earth during the LHB to be ∼2×1020 kg (21). We assume that a Gaussian curve for the rate of impacts during the LHB (30), which centers on 3.85 Ga, integrates to 2×1020 kg, and drops to nearly zero at 3.9 and 3.8 Ga. Thus,dmLHB(t)=5.33×1021e−(t−0.65)22(0.015)2dt [kg],[S6]where dmLHB is the total mass from t to t+dt (gigayears) (t = 0 starts at 4.5 Ga).

Equations for the minimum and maximum mass delivered to early Earth, given that a sustained declining bombardment preceded 3.9 Ga, are (6)mminB(t)=1×1021−0.76[4.5−t+4.57× 10−7(e(4.5−t)/τa−1)]m21−b4πRmoon2Σ[kg][S7]mmaxB(t)=7×1023−0.4[4.5−t+5.6× 10−23(e(4.5−t)/τc−1)]m21−b4πRmoon2Σ[kg],[S8]where mminB and mmaxB are the total mass delivered from t = 0 to t=t (t = 0 starts at 4.5 Ga), τa and τb are decay constants (τa = 0.22 Gy, τb = 0.07 Gy), m2 is the maximum impactor mass (m2 = 1.5 × 1018 kg), b = 0.47, Rmoon is the mean radius of the moon (Rmoon = 1737.1 km), and Σ is the ratio of the gravitational cross-sections of Earth and the moon (Σ ∼23).

Taking the derivatives of Eqs. S7 and S8 gives us the corresponding rates of mass delivered to early Earth.dmminB(t)=0.76(1+4.57×10−7τae(4.5−t)/τa)m21−b4πRmoon2Σdt [kg].[S9]dmmaxB(t)=0.4(1+5.6×10−23τce(4.5−t)/τc)m21−b4πRmoon2Σdt [kg].[S10]See Fig. 1 for a plot of the three mass delivery models.

Impactor Mass Distribution.

Chemical analyses of lunar impact samples, and crater size distributions, suggest that the impactors of Earth and the moon before ∼3.85 Ga were dominated by main-belt asteroids (51). It is also likely that the size-frequency distribution of impactors on early Earth is similar to that of the main-belt asteroids today (52). Although there is no conclusive evidence to constrain the fraction of early Earth impactors that were of cometary origin, some suggest ∼10% of the total accreted mass was from comets (6).

The early Earth impactor mass distribution for impactors with radii 20 m to 40 m, adjusted for the total mass delivered during the LHB, follows the linear relationdmLHB(r)=[7.5×1013r+3×1015]dr [kg],[S11]where dm is the mass of impactors with radii r to r+dr (meters) (21).

To get the impactor mass distributions for the mass delivered between t and t+dt in each of our three models, we multiply Eq. S11 by Eq. S6, S9, or S10, and divide by 2×1020 kg.dmi(t,r)=[7.5×1013r+3×1015]dmi(t)2×1020dr [kg],[S12]where i is the model (LHB, minB, or maxB).

Impactor Number Distribution.

Eq. S12 can be turned into a number distribution (from t to t+dt) for asteroids of a specific size and type (e.g., carbonaceous chondrites, ordinary chondrites, irons) by multiplying by the fraction of impactors that are asteroids (fa) and the fraction of asteroid impacts that are of a specific meteorite parent body type (ft), and then dividing by the volume and average density of such asteroids. After simplification, this isdNi(t,r)=3faft4πρ[7.5×1013r2+3×1015r3]dmi(t)2×1020dr,[S13]where i is the model (LHB, minB, or maxB).

Total Number of Carbonaceous Impactors.

Although some carbonaceous chondrites may have originated from comets (53), for this calculation, we conservatively assume that all carbonaceous meteorites originated from asteroids.

Integrating Eq. S13 from rmin to rmax gives the total number of meteoroids in that radii range to have impacted early Earth, from t to t+dt, for each model.dNi(t)=3faft4πρ[7.5×1013(1rmin−1rmax)+3×10152(1rmin2−1rmax2)]dmi(t)2×1020,[S14]where i is the model (LHB, minB, or maxB).

Probability of WLP Deposition.

The probability of an infinitesimally small object hitting within a target area, given that the probability of hitting anywhere within the total area is equal, is the geometric probabilityPg=AtargAtot.[S15]This equation can be used to estimate the probability of blindly hitting the bull’s-eye on a dartboard from relatively close in, where Atarg is the area of the bull’s-eye and Atot is the area of the dartboard. In this case, since the tip of a dart is relatively small with respect to the bull’s-eye, the approximation is relatively accurate. In the case of estimating the probability of meteoroid fragments falling into a WLP, the tip of the “dart” (i.e., the debris area of meteoroid fragments) is not always going to be larger than the “bull’s-eye” (i.e., the total surface area of WLPs at any time). For example, the probability of fragments from a single meteoroid falling into a WLP at ∼4.5 Ga to 4.45 Ga, when there was a small fraction of continental crust and few WLPs, is more analogous to the probability of blindly hitting the bull’s-eye with a small ball, which would be slightly more likely than with a dart. Any large enough part of the ball overlapping with the bull’s-eye counts as a hit, as does any large enough part of the debris field overlapping with the combined WLP surface area. “Large enough,” in our case, corresponds to the area of the largest WLP for which the meteoroid fragment deposition probability is being calculated (or, equivalently, 100 of the smallest WLPs in our study). (This minimum area is necessary to assume a homogeneous surface deposition when calculating the total mass of meteoroid fragments to have entered a WLP.)

To use Eq. S15 to calculate the probability for the fragments of a single meteoroid landing in a primordial WLP, Atarg must be the effective target area. The effective target area is illustrated in Fig. S6. Any meteoroid that enters the atmosphere within the effective target area (of radius d) disperses its fragments over at least one WLP’s entire surface.

Fig. S6.
Fig. S6.

The dotted circle represents the target area for landing the dispersed fragments from a single meteoroid into any WLP on early Earth. The smaller, light gray circle in the center is the total combined WLP surface area on early Earth at a given time (WLPs would have been individually scattered; however, for a geometric probability calculation, they can be visualized as a single pond cross-section). The larger, surrounding circles represent the area of debris when the fragments of the meteoroid hit the ground. Shortly after 4.5 Ga, the area of debris from a single meteoroid would be large compared with the combined WLP surface area. At any time, the target area for a meteoroid to deposit fragments homogeneously into at least one WLP is slightly larger than the combined area of WLPs. The effective target area grows linearly with total WLP surface area. The diagonally striped intersections between the circles represent the largest individual WLP for which the meteoroid fragment deposition probability is being calculated. The logic is that, if a meteoroid enters the atmosphere at distance d from the center of the combined pond cross-section, at least one pond of any size in the WLP distribution will completely overlap with the area of debris.

The area of the asymmetric “lens” in which any two circles intersect isA=r2cos−1(d2+r2−R22dr)+R2cos−1(d2+R2−r22dR)−12(−d+r+R)(d+r−R)(d−r+R)(d+r+R),[S16]for circles of radii r and R, and distance between their centers d (54).

In Fig. S6, the asymmetric lens created by the intersection of the combined WLP surface area at a given time and the meteoroid fragment debris area corresponds to the area of the largest individual WLP in our distribution. Because the effective target area radius, d, grows linearly with total WLP surface area radius, R, we can plot Eq. S16 at t = 1 Gy to solve for d, and input the linear time dependence afterward. For this calculation, A = 3.14 × 10−4 km2, r = rg = 0.5 km, and R = 651km2/π = 14.4 km. This gives us the effective target radius, d = 14.9 km, and corresponds to an effective target area,Aeff(t)=697t[km2].[S17]See Fig. 1 for a plot of the effective WLP surface area over time.

Finally, the probability of the fragments from all CM-, CI-, or CR-type meteoroids (Mighei type, Ivuna type, and Renazzo type, respectively) with radii rmin = 20 m to rmax = 40 m landing in WLPs on early Earth of radii 1 m to 10 m from time t to t+dt is the product of Eqs. S14 and S15.dPi(t)=697t4πR⊕2dNi(t),[S18]where i is the model (LHB, minB, or maxB).

In Fig. S7, we plot the normalized probability distributions (dPi/dt) for the deposition of carbonaceous meteorites into WLPs from 4.5 Ga to 3.7 Ga. The LHB, the minimum bombardment, and the maximum bombardment models are compared. For the LHB model, there are 10 WLP depositions from 3.9 Ga to 3.8 Ga; 95% of these depositions occur between 3.88 and 3.82 Ga. For the minimum bombardment model, there are 15 WLP depositions during the entire Hadean Eon; however, 95% of these depositions occur between 4.47 and 3.77 Ga. Finally, for the maximum bombardment model, there are 3,840 depositions during the Hadean Eon, with 95% of these depositions occurring between 4.50 and 4.17 Ga. See Fig. 1 for cumulative deposition distributions.

Fig. S7.
Fig. S7.

Normalized probability distributions of fragments from CM-, CI-, and CR-type meteoroids with radii 20 m to 40 m landing in WLPs on early Earth of radii 1 m to 10 m. Three models for mass delivery are compared: the LHB model, and minimum and maximum mass models for a sustained, declining bombardment preceding 3.9 Ga. All models are based on analyses of the lunar cratering record (6, 21). See Fig. 1 for display of mass delivery rates. The 95% confidence intervals are shaded, and correspond to the most likely deposition intervals for each model.

One assumption is made in our deposition probability calculation, which is, given that the largest WLP considered is completely within the carbonaceous meteoroid’s strewnfield, at least one fragment will land in the WLP. (An equivalent assumption would be, given that 100 of the smallest WLPs considered are completely within the meteoroid’s strewnfield, at least one fragment will deposit into one of the ponds.) To determine whether this is the case, we need a good estimate for the number of fragments that spread over a debris field from a single carbonaceous meteoroid. For the Pułtusk stony meteoroid, which entered Earth’s atmosphere above Poland in 1868 (55), the number of fragments is estimated to be 180,000 (55). Although the Pułtusk meteorites may not represent the typical fragmentation of stony meteoroids, since this meteoroid is about 1.6 times denser than the average carbonaceous meteoroids in our study (56), we would expect a carbonaceous meteoroid to fragment more than the typical stony meteorite. If meteoroid fragments are randomly spaced within a strewnfield, then Eq. S15 multiplied by the number of meteoroid fragments will give us roughly the number of fragments that will enter a WLP. (In this case, Atarg is the area of the cylindrical pond, and Atot is the area of the strewnfield.). From this calculation, given that a 10-m-radius WLP is within a 180,000-fragment strewnfield of radius 500 m, roughly 72 carbonaceous meteoroid fragments will land in the pond. In fact, as long as 40- to 80-m carbonaceous meteoroids fragment into at least 2,500 pieces, fragment deposition into a 10-m-radius WLP is probable. We therefore consider this assumption reasonable.

Sensitivity Analysis.

In our estimate of the number of carbonaceous meteoroids that led to WLP depositions on early Earth, we assume that, from 4.5 Ga to 3.7 Ga, the continental crust grows at 16%/Gy (29), and the ponds per unit area is the same as today. However, the uncertainty in the growth rate of continental crust and the WLPs per unit area on early Earth is high. For example, the number of WLPs per unit area was probably higher on the above-sea-level crust of the Hadean Earth than it is on Earth’s continents now. The greater rate of asteroid bombardment during the Hadean (30) would have created many small craters, which, over a few rain cycles, could fill to become ponds. On the other hand, geophysical models suggest the surface ocean was increasing in volume from ∼4.5 Ga to 4.0 Ga (57). This would slow the growth rate of above-sea-level crust. Because of these uncertainties, we adjust the growth rate of WLPs on early Earth by plus or minus one order of magnitude to obtain error bars. Because the probability of deposition (Eq. S18) is directly proportional to the number of WLPs on early Earth, varying the growth rate of WLPs by plus or minus one order of magnitude equates to a plus or minus one order of magnitude uncertainty in the WLP deposition expectation values (Fig. 1).

Sources and Sinks Model Overview

Calculating the water and nucleobase content in WLPs over time is a problem of sources and sinks. These sources and sinks are illustrated in Fig. 2 and displayed in Table S1.

View this table:
Table S1.

Sources and sinks of pond water and nucleobases in our model of early Earth WLPs

Because nucleobase diffusion from carbonaceous meteorite fragments is slow (Nucleobase Outflow and Mixing), this source is only turned on in the wet phase. Although it may be possible for nucleobases to occasionally enter WLPs from runoff, we do not consider this as a source. IDPs that fall on dry land are the most likely nucleobase source to be carried by runoff into WLPs (because of their low mass). However, these IDPs are exposed to photodissociating UV light until they are picked up by a runoff stream, by which time few if any enclosed nucleobases likely remain. Hydrolysis of nucleobases only occurs in the presence of liquid water; therefore, we only turn on this sink when our ponds are wet. Similarly, seepage of nucleobases through the pores in the bases of WLPs only occurs during the wet phase. A 1-m column of pond water can absorb UV radiation up to ∼95% (37); therefore, as a first-order approximation, we only turn on UV photodissociation when our WLPs are in the dry phase. We do not consider cosmic rays as a sink for nucleobases, as a study has shown that adenine has a half-life of millions of years from cosmic ray dissociation at 1 AU (58). This is several orders of magnitude greater than the timescales of nucleobase decay from the other sinks. Finally, since we are interested in accumulating nucleobases in WLPs so that they can react to form nucleotides, a future model will include such reactions as a sink.

Pond Water Sources and Sinks

Evaporation.

There are many variables that could go into a pond evaporation calculation. However, a simple relation was obtained by measuring the depth and temperature of a ∼1-m-radius lined pond (to prevent seepage) and a class-A cylindrical evaporation pan over time,dEdt=−9.94+5.04T [mm⋅mo−1],[S19]where dE is the drop in pond depth, and T is the pond temperature in degrees Celsius (25).

This relation is converted to meters per year,dEdt=−0.12+0.06T [m⋅y−1].[S20]

Seepage.

Unless the material (e.g., basalt, soil, clay) at the base of a WLP is saturated in water, gravity will cause pond solution to seep through the pores in this material. The average seepage rate of 55 small ponds in Auburn, Ala., was measured to be 5.1 mm⋅d−1 (26). This value is high compared with the average seepage rates from small ponds in North Dakota and Minnesota (1.0 mm⋅d−1) and the Black Prairie region of Alabama (1.6 mm⋅d−1) (26). These seepage rates are comparable in magnitude to the pond evaporation rates in Evaporation, and therefore must be considered as a sink for water and nucleobases in our WLP model. We take an average of the above three values and apply a constant seepage rate of 2.6 mm⋅d−1 to our WLP water evolution calculations.dSdt=0.95 [m⋅y−1].[S21]We assume that the majority of seepage occurs from the base of the pond, where the water pressure is the highest. The effect of seepage on nucleobase mass loss is handled in Nucleobase Sinks.

Precipitation.

If we ignore the possibility of local water geysers, the main source of pond water is likely to be precipitation. It has been shown that the vast majority of monthly precipitation climates around the world can be adequately described by a sinusoidal function with a 1-y period (24). That is,dPdt=P¯[1+δpsin(2π(t−sp)τs)] [m⋅y−1],[S22]where dP is the amount of precipitation, P¯ is the mean precipitation rate (meters per year), δp is the dimensionless seasonal precipitation amplitude, sp is the phase shift of precipitation (years), t is the time (years), and τs is the duration of the seasonal cycle (i.e., 1 y) (24).

From 1980 to 2009, the mean precipitation on Earth ranged from ∼0.004 m⋅y−1 to 10 m⋅y−1 (with a global mean of ∼0.7 m⋅y−1), the seasonal precipitation amplitudes ranged from ∼0 to 4.7, and the latitude-dependent phase shift ranged from 0 y to 1 y (24).

Summary.

The evaporation and seepage rates minus the rate of water rise due to precipitation gives us the overall rate of water decrease in a WLP.dLdt=0.83+0.06T−P¯[1+δpsin(2π(t−sp)τs)] [m⋅y−1].[S23]Eq. S23 is too complex to be solved by standard analytical techniques or mathematical software; therefore, we solve it numerically using a forward time finite difference approximation with the boundary conditions 0 ≤L(T,t)≤rp. We then convert the drop in pond depth as a function of time, L(t), to the mass of water in the WLP using the water density and the volume of a cylindrical portion. This equates tom(t)=πρwrp2(rp−L) [kg].[S24]For our models, we assume pond water of density ρw = 1,000 kg⋅m−3.

Nucleobase Sinks

Hydrolysis.

The first-order hydrolysis rate constants for adenine (A), guanine (G), uracil (U), and cytosine (C) have been measured from decomposition experiments at pH 7 (28). These rate constants are expressed in the Arrhenius equations,kA=10−5902T+8.15[S25]kG=10−6330T+9.40[S26]kU=10−7649T+11.76[S27]kC=10−5620T+8.69[s−1].[S28]The nucleobase decomposition rate due to being dissolved in water can then be obtained by plugging Eqs. S25–S28 into the first-order reaction rate law,dmidt=−miγk [kg⋅y−1],[S29]where γ = 3,600 ⋅ 24 ⋅ 365.25 s⋅y−1.

The hydrolysis rates of adenine, guanine, and cytosine remain relatively stable in solutions with pH values from 4.5 to 9 (28, 59). WLPs may have been slightly acidic (from pH 4.8 to 6.5) due to the higher partial pressure of CO2 in early Earth atmosphere (34).

UV Photodissociation.

The photodestruction of adenine has been studied by irradiating dried samples under Martian surface UV conditions (27). This quantum efficiency of photodecomposition (from 200 nm to 250 nm)—which is independent of the thickness of the sample—was measured to be 1.0±0.9×10−4 molecules per photon (27).

For the calculation of the quantum efficiency of adenine, a beam of UV radiation was focused on a thin compact adenine sample formed through sublimation and recondensation (27). In this case, all of the photons in the beam of UV radiation were incident on the nucleobases. In the WLP scenario, not all of the incoming UV photons will be incident on nucleobases. Instead, large gaps can exist between nucleobases that collect at the base of the pond. Therefore, the number of photons incident on the pond area is not the same as those incident on the scattered nucleobases unless there are at least enough nucleobases present to cover the entire pond area. Since the nucleobases are mixed well into the pond water before complete evaporation, we assume nucleobases will spread out evenly as they collect on the base of the pond. This means we assume that all locations on the base of the pond are covered in nucleobases before nucleobases stack on top of one another. For low abundances of total nucleobases in a WLP, this approach will lead to a slightly higher estimate for the rate of photodissociation than expected. We deem this acceptable for a first-order estimate of nucleobase photodissociation.

The mass of nucleobases photodestroyed per year, per area covered by nucleobases (i.e., the photodestruction flux), is constant over time and is dependent on the experimentally measured quantum efficiency of photodecomposition.M˙i=ΦFλγμihcNA [kg⋅y−1⋅m−2],[S30]where Φ is the quantum efficiency of photodecomposition of the molecules (molecules per photon), F is the UV flux incident on the entire pond area (watts per square meter), λ is the average wavelength of UV radiation incident on the sample (meters), γ is 3,600 ⋅ 24 ⋅ 365.25 s⋅y−1, μi is the molecular weight of the irradiated molecules (kilograms per mole), h is Planck’s constant (kilogram square meters per second), c is the speed of light (meters per second), and NA is Avogadro’s number (molecules per mole).

Our estimation of the photodestruction rate of a nucleobase depends on the total mass of the nucleobase within the WLP. If there is enough of the nucleobase present for the entire base of the pond to be covered, we can multiply the photodestruction flux by the entire pond area. Otherwise, we must multiply the photodestruction flux by the combined cross-sectional area of the nucleobase present in the WLP to get the photodestruction rate.dmidt={−M˙imiρid,ifmiρid<Ap−M˙iAp,otherwise[kg⋅y−1],[S31]where mi is the mass of the sample (kilograms), ρi is the mass density of the nucleobase (kilograms per cubic meter), d is the distance between two stacked nucleobases in the solid phase (meters), and Ap is the area of the WLP (square meters).

Assuming cloudless skies, an upper limit on early Earth integrated UV flux from 200 nm to 250 nm is ∼0.4 W⋅m−2 (36, 60). UV wavelengths of <200 nm would be completed attenuated by CO2 and H2O in the early atmosphere (36). The mass density of solid adenine is 1,470 kg⋅m−3, making the distance between two stacked adenine molecules in the solid phase ∼6.6 Å. For guanine, uracil, and cytosine, we take the mass densities to be 2,200, 1,320, and 1,550 kg⋅m−3, respectively.

Seepage.

The constant pond water seepage S˙ = 0.95 m⋅y−1 was determined in Pond Water Sources and Sinks. This can be used to calculate the nucleobase seepage rate via the equationdmidt=wiρwApS˙ [kg⋅y−1],[S32]where wi is the nucleobase mass fraction, ρw is the density of water (kilograms per year), and Ap is the area of the WLP (square meters).

Nucleobase Outflow and Mixing

Chondritic IDPs and meteorites are porous (61⇓–63). With the exception of the nucleobases potentially formed due to surface photochemistry (12), any soluble nucleobases delivered to prebiotic Earth by carbonaceous IDPs and meteorites would have lain frozen in the pores of these sources upon their entering the atmosphere. Pulse heating experiments show that approximately ∼1 to 6% of the organics within IDPs could have survived atmospheric entry (62). In addition, based on their presence in carbonaceous chondrites today, nucleobases in carbonaceous meteorites evidently would have also survived atmospheric entry heating. Therefore, both sources, upon entering WLPs on prebiotic Earth, would have slowly released their remaining soluble nucleobases into the surrounding pond water. These nucleobases would then slowly homogenize into the pond solution.

We model the outflow of nucleobases from carbonaceous IDPs and meteorites and the mixing of a local concentration of nucleobases into a WLP using finite difference approximations of the one-dimensional advection–diffusion equation (see Advection and Diffusion Model for complete details).

Our model of nucleobase outflow is run for average-sized IDPs (r = 100 μm), and for small (r = 1 cm), medium (r = 5 cm), and large (r = 10 cm) carbonaceous meteorites. The fraction of nucleobases remaining in each of these sources as a function of time is plotted in Fig. S4.

Our models show that the duration of nucleobase diffusion from carbonaceous IDPs and meteorites into WLPs is mostly determined by the radius of the source. For typical, 100-μm-radius carbonaceous IDPs lying at the bottom of a WLP, it takes <2 min for >99% of the soluble nucleobases to diffuse into the surrounding pond water. For 1-cm-radius carbonaceous meteorites, this time increases to 10 d. For the largest carbonaceous meteoroid fragments, with radii of 5 cm and 10 cm, this duration increases to ∼8 and 32 mo, respectively.

For nucleobase mixing, we model a base-to-surface convection cell within cylindrical ponds with equal radii and depths of 1 m, 5 m, and 10 m. This model gives us the timescale of mixing a local concentration of nucleobases within WLPs. The maximum percent local nucleobase concentration difference from the average is plotted as a function of time in Fig. S8. This metric allows us to characterize the nucleobase homogeneity in a convection cell of the WLP.

Fig. S8.
Fig. S8.

The nucleobase mixing time in a base-to-surface convection cell (length = 2rp) within 1-, 5-, and 10-m-deep WLPs, beginning from a local concentration at the base of the pond. Nucleobase mixing is measured using the maximum percent local nucleobase concentration difference from the average. The time at which the maximum local nucleobase concentration difference from the average drops to 10% is labeled on the plot for each pond size. At this time, we consider the nucleobases in the WLP to be well mixed. For WLPs with radii 1, 5, and 10 m, the convection cell nucleobase mixing times are 35, 104, and 150 min, respectively.

Our simulations suggest that the mixing of local deposits of nucleobases in WLPs, resulting from their diffusion out of carbonaceous IDPs and meteorites, is a very efficient process. For a cylindrical WLP 1 m in depth, it will take about 35 min for a local deposition to homogenize in a convection cell within the pond. For larger WLPs, with 5- and 10-m depths, the nucleobase mixing time increases to 104 and 150 min, respectively. These short mixing times make it clear that, for carbonaceous meteorites ≥ 1 cm in radius, nucleobase homogenization in WLPs is dominated by the nucleobase outflow time from these bodies. In contrast, being that carbonaceous IDPs are much smaller than meteoroid fragments, the nucleobase outflow time from IDPs is negligible compared with the nucleobase homogenization time in WLPs.

Nucleobase Evolution Equation from IDPs

It is estimated that, at 4 Ga, approximately 6×108 kg⋅y−1 of carbonaceous IDPs were being accreted onto Earth (11). Since IDPs are tiny (typically ∼100 μm in radius), they are circulated by the atmosphere upon accretion and thus likely reached almost everywhere on prebiotic Earth. Approximately 1 to 6% of the organic content within IDPs could have survived the pulse heating of atmospheric entry (62). Assuming IDPs accreted uniformly, the surface nucleobase mass accretion per square area would bedmidtdA=wim˙Ifs4πR⊕2[kg⋅y−1⋅m−2],[S33]where wi is the nucleobase mass fraction within IDPs for nucleobase i, m˙I is the mass accretion rate of IDPs on prebiotic Earth (kilograms per year), and fs is the average fraction of nucleobases that survive pulse heating from atmospheric entry.

IDPs are thought to correspond to origins of asteroids or comets (11); therefore, at best, the average nucleobase abundances in IDPs could match the average nucleobase content within the nucleobase-rich CM, CR, and CI meteorites. The average abundances of adenine, guanine, and uracil in CM, CR, and CI meteorites are listed in Table S2, along with the weighted averages based on relative fall frequencies. These abundances might be an upper limit for the guanine, adenine, and uracil content of IDPs, because, unlike the interior of large meteorites, molecule-dissociating UV radiation can penetrate everywhere within micrometer-to-millimeter-sized pieces of dust.

View this table:
Table S2.

Average guanine, adenine, and uracil abundances (in parts per billion) in the CM, CR, and CI carbonaceous chondrites

The amount of cytosine that could have formed on the surfaces of primordial IDPs is not well constrained. Cytosine has been detected in experiments exposing IDP analogs to UV radiation, but hasn’t been quantified (12). Furthermore, these analog experiments formed cytosine via photoreactions involving pyrimidine: a molecule that has no measured abundance in IDPs or meteorites. For this analysis, we explore a best-case scenario, and set the maximum cytosine IDP abundance to 141.3 ppb (the possible upper limit of guanine in carbonaceous IDPs).

In Nucleobase Outflow and Mixing, we learned that nucleobase diffusion from IDPs is quick (lasting <2 min), and nucleobase homogenization in WLPs takes 1 h to a few hours, depending on the pond size. If we spread out the 6×108 kg⋅y−1 accretion rate of IDPs uniformly across the surface of Earth—assuming IDPs are all 100-μm-radius spheres of CI, CM, and CR type (ρ = ∼2,185 kg⋅m−3)—then IDPs would drop into 1- to 10-m-radius primordial WLPs at approximately 0.05 h−1 to 5 h−1. Since each carbonaceous IDP can only carry a tiny mass in nucleobases (∼1 pg), nucleobase inhomogeneities within WLPs would be a maximum of ∼15 pg. This abundance of nucleobases is negligible; therefore, for our calculations of nucleobase accumulation in WLPs from IDP sources, we can assume that nucleobase deposition and pond homogenization are instantaneous.

Thus, the differential equation for the mass of nucleobase i accumulated in a WLP from IDP sources over time is the sum of the nucleobase mass accretion rate from IDPs, the nucleobase mass decomposition rate, the nucleobase mass seepage rate, and the nucleobase photodissociation rate,dmi,IDP(t)dt=wim˙IfsAp4πR⊕2−γmiki−wiρwApS˙−{M˙imiρid,ifmiρid<ApM˙iAp,otherwise[kg⋅y−1].[S34]The second and third terms after the equal sign are only activated when the pond is wet, and the fourth term is only activated when the pond is dry. The first term is always activated, as recently accreted nucleobases are susceptible to UV dissociation while still lying in the pores of IDPs, and they effectively instantaneously outflow from IDPs upon wetting.

Using Eq. S34, we compute the nucleobase mass as a function of time numerically using a forward time finite difference approximation. We then divide the nucleobase mass by the water mass at each time step to obtain the nucleobase mass concentration over time. Because some ponds are seasonally dry, we freeze the water level at 1 mm during the dry phase to calculate a nucleobase concentration during this phase.

Nucleobase Evolution Equation from Meteorites

Simulations show that the fragments from carbonaceous meteoroids with diameters from 40 m to 80 m and initial velocities of 15 km/s will expand over a radius of ∼500 m, and ∼ 32% of the original meteoroids will survive ablation (32). Since a single meteoroid impacting the atmosphere may break up into 180,000 fragments before spreading across its strewnfield, it is probable that a meteorite deposition event involves multiple meteorites landing in a single WLP. The best estimate of the total nucleobase mass deposited into a WLP is thus calculated assuming the ablated meteoroid mass is spread uniformly over its strewnfield. Considering this, the total nucleobase mass to deposit into a WLP from a meteoroid would bemi0=43wifsr3ρAprg2[kg],[S35]where wi is the nucleobase mass fraction within the meteoroid for nucleobase i, fs is the fraction of the meteoroid to survive ablation, r is the meteoroid radius as it enters Earth’s atmosphere (meters), ρ is the density of the meteoroid (kilograms per cubic meter), rg is the radius of the debris when the meteoroid fragments hit the ground (meters), and Ap is the area of the WLP (square meters).

After the deposition of meteoroid fragments into a WLP, the frozen meteorite interiors will thaw to pond temperature, allowing hydrolysis to begin inside the fragments’ pores. This means the total mass of nucleobases that diffuse from the fragments’ pores into the pond will be less than the total initial nucleobase mass within the deposited fragments. By integrating the nucleobase hydrolysis rate (Eq. S29), we obtain the mass of nucleobase i remaining after a given time of hydration th,mi=mi0e−γkith[kg].[S36]Note that th (years) may be different from t, as the hydration clock is paused when WLPs are dry.

Unlike carbonaceous IDPs, which unload their nucleobases into a WLP in seconds, nucleobases may not completely outflow from all deposited carbonaceous meteoroid fragments before the WLP evaporates. (However, the nucleobases that do outflow from the meteorites will mix homogeneously into the WLP within a single day–night cycle.) Thus, we calculate the nucleobase outflow time constants for 1-, 5-, and 10-cm-radius carbonaceous meteorites by performing least-squares regressions of our nucleobase diffusion simulation results to the functionf(th)=α(1−e−thτd).[S37]This equation shows that, as time increases, the mass of nucleobases that have flowed out of a single meteorite, into the WLP, approaches the coefficient α—which represents the total initial nucleobase mass contained in the meteorite. Since nucleobase outflow is mass-independent, we can use an arbitrary initial total nucleobase mass for α in our simulations to obtain the nucleobase outflow time constants.

The results of the fits give diffusion time constants for 1-, 5-, and 10-cm-radius fragments of τd = 4.9 × 10−3 y, 0.12 y, and 0.48 y, respectively.

Adding up the sources and sinks gives us the nucleobase mass within the WLP from meteorite sources as a function of time and hydration time.dmi,Met(t,th)dt=mi0τde−th(γki+1τd)−γmiki−wiρwApS˙−{M˙imiρid,ifmiρid<ApM˙iAp,otherwise[kg⋅y−1].[S38]The first three terms after the equal sign are only activated when the pond is wet, and the fourth term is only activated when the pond is dry.

Since there are many possibilities for the sizes of meteoroid fragments that will enter a WLP, we consider three simplified models: All fragments that enter a WLP from a meteoroid of radius 20 m to 40 m are either 1 cm in radius, 5 cm in radius, or 10 cm in radius. These three models represent a local part of the strewnfield that deposited either many small fragments, mostly medium-sized fragments, or just a couple to a few large fragments.

Cytosine is unlikely to have sustained within meteorite parent bodies long enough to be delivered to early Earth by meteorites (15); therefore, we only model the accumulation of adenine, guanine, and uracil in WLPs from meteorite sources.

We solve Eq. S38 numerically using a forward time finite difference approximation. Nucleobase concentration is then obtained by dividing the nucleobase mass by the water mass in the WLP at each time step.

Additional Results

Pond Water.

In Fig. S9, we explore the effects of changing temperature on wet environment WLPs of 1-m radius and depth (see Table 1 for wet environment model details). To do this, we vary our fiducial model temperatures (65 °C for a hot early Earth and 20 °C for a warm early Earth) by ±15 °C. As temperature increases, evaporation becomes more efficient; however, the wet environment WLPs never dry completely.

Fig. S9.
Fig. S9.

The effect of temperature on the change in water mass over time in wet environment cylindrical WLPs with radii and depths of 1 m. Temperatures are varied for a hot early Earth model (50 °C, 65 °C, and 80 °C) and a warm early Earth model (5 °C, 20 °C, and 35 °C). Precipitation rates from Columbia and Thailand on Earth today are used to represent the hot and warm early Earth analogues, respectively (for details, see Table 1). COL, Columbia; THA, Thailand.

Nucleobase Accumulation from IDPs.

In Fig. S1, we explore the evolution of adenine concentration from only IDP sources in WLPs of 1-m radius and depth. We model the adenine accumulation in three environments (dry, intermediate, and wet) on a hot and warm early Earth (see Table 1 for precipitation model details). Fig. S1A is for 65 °C on a hot early Earth and 20 °C on a warm early Earth, and Fig. S1B is for 50 °C on a hot early Earth and 5 °C on a warm early Earth.

All adenine concentration curves reach a stable seasonal pattern within ∼5 y. The highest adenine concentrations occur for models with a dry phase (i.e., the dry and intermediate models at 65 °C, and the dry model at 50 °C.) The lower maximum concentrations in the models without a dry phase are due to the sustained high water levels. The maximum adenine to accumulate in any model from IDP sources is ∼0.2 ppq. This occurs just before the pond dries. Upon drying, UV photodissociation immediately drops the adenine concentration to an amount which balances the incoming adenine from IDP accretion. The curves in Fig. S1 do not change drastically with increasing pond radius and depth once a stable seasonal pattern is reached. This is because, although ponds of increasing surface area collect more nucleobases, these ponds have an equivalent increase in area to nucleobase seepage.

In Fig. S2, we explore guanine, uracil, and cytosine accumulation in degenerate dry environment WLPs for a hot early Earth at 65 °C and a warm early Earth at 20 °C (see Table 1 for details). The differences in each nucleobase mass fraction over time are caused by the different initial abundances of each nucleobase in IDPs (Table S2). Although hydrolysis rates differ between nucleobases, decay due to hydrolysis is negligible over <10-y periods at temperatures lower than ∼70 °C.

In Fig. S5, we turn off seepage, e.g., resembling a scenario where a lipid biofilm has covered the WLP base, and explore the evolution of adenine concentrations from IDP sources. This model is displayed for a hot early Earth at 65 °C and a warm early Earth at 20 °C (see Table 1 for details). UV photodissociation is always the dominant nucleobase sink for the dry and intermediate environments; therefore, for this model, we only display the evolution of adenine in the wet environment, where hydrolysis takes over as the dominant nucleobase sink.

In the absence of seepage, adenine concentrations can build up in wet environment WLPs until the rate of incoming adenine from IDPs matches the decay rate due to hydrolysis. Hydrolysis rates are faster at hotter temperatures; therefore, maximum adenine concentrations are higher and take longer to converge in the 20 °C pond compared with the 65 °C pond. However, these maximum adenine concentrations are 145 and 0.3 ppq, respectively, which are negligible in comparison with the parts per billion–parts per million-level adenine concentrations reached in WLPs from carbonaceous meteorite sources.

Nucleobase Accumulation from Meteorites.

In Fig. S10, we explore the evolution of adenine concentrationin WLPs with radii and depths of 1 m, from 1-cm fragments of an initially 40-m-radius carbonaceous meteoroid. The models correspond to degenerate environments on a hot (65 °C) and warm (20 °C) early Earth. The maximum adenine concentration in the intermediate environment is ∼1.4 ppm, and occurs 16 h after the fragments deposit into the nearly empty pond. The dry and wet environments allow for a maximum adenine concentration of ∼2 ppm. Because adenine outflow from 1-cm-sized meteorites occurs in just 10 d, only adenine sinks exist from 10 d onward. As the ponds wet, the adenine concentrations decrease exponentially, and, as the ponds dry again, the curves flatten out and ramp up slightly before the ponds completely dry up. When the ponds dry, UV radiation quickly wipes out the adenine at the base of the ponds. Since the wet environment doesn’t have a dry phase, the adenine concentration slowly diminishes in this model, due mainly to seepage.

Fig. S10.
Fig. S10.

The accumulation of adenine from 1-cm fragments of an initially 40-m-radius carbonaceous meteoroid in a cylindrical WLP with a radius and depth of 1 m. The degenerate WLP models used for these calculations correspond to a hot early Earth at 65 °C and a warm early Earth at 20 °C. (A) The accumulation of adenine from carbonaceous meteorites in an intermediate environment (for details, see Table 1). The wet–dry cycles of the pond are also shown to illustrate the effect of water level on adenine concentration. (B) The three curves (dry, intermediate, and wet environments) differ by their precipitation rates, which are from a variety of locations on Earth today, and represent two classes of matching early Earth analogues: hot (Columbia, Indonesia, Cameroon) and warm (Thailand, Brazil, and Mexico) (for details, see Table 1). The curves are obtained by numerically solving Eq. S38. BRA, Brazil; Env, environment; IDN, Indonesia.

The adenine mass fraction curves in Fig. S10, over a 2-y period, do not change, as pond radii and depths increase equally. This is because, although the mass of water in a WLP increases for larger collecting areas, larger pond areas also collect more meteorite fragments, which counterbalances the water mass and keeps the nucleobase concentration the same.

In Fig. S11, we explore how initial meteoroid radius affects the maximum concentration of adenine accumulated (from its fragments) in WLPs with radii and depths of 1 m. The maximum adenine concentration only differs by at most a factor of 8 when varying the initial meteoroid radius from 20 m to 40 m. This is because the nucleobase mass to enter a WLP scales with the meteoroid mass, i.e., ∝ r3.

Fig. S11.
Fig. S11.

The maximum concentration of adenine accumulated from 1-cm fragments of a carbonaceous meteoroid 20 m to 40 m in radius in cylindrical WLPs with radii and depths of 1 m. The degenerate WLP models used for these calculations correspond to a hot early Earth at 65 °C and a warm early Earth at 20 °C. The three curves (dry, intermediate, and wet environments) differ by their precipitation rates, which are from a variety of locations on Earth today, and represent two classes of matching early Earth analogues: hot (Columbia, Indonesia, Cameroon) and warm (Thailand, Brazil, and Mexico) (for details, see Table 1). The curves are obtained by numerically solving Eq. S38. Env, environment.

Finally, in Fig. S3, we explore guanine and uracil accumulation in intermediate and wet environment WLPs with radii and depths of 1 m. These models correspond to a hot early Earth at 65 °C and a warm early Earth at 20 °C. The small differences between each nucleobase mass fraction over time are due to the different initial nucleobase abundances in the deposited meteorite fragments (Table S2). Although each nucleobase has a different hydrolysis rate (Eq. S25), the decay of guanine, adenine, and uracil due to hydrolysis is negligible in <10 y for temperatures of <65 °C.

Advection and Diffusion Model

Advection and diffusion are the two main considerations of solute transport in water. Because nucleobases will diffuse out of the pores of carbonaceous IDPs and meteorites at a different rate than they will mix homogeneously in the WLP, we separate our nucleobase transport model into two distinct parts. In part one, we model the outflow of nucleobases from carbonaceous IDPs and meteorites. In part two, we model the mixing of a local concentration of nucleobases into a WLP.

Both parts of our simulation can be modeled with the advection–diffusion equation below, with either one or both right-hand side terms “turned on.”ϕ∂Ci∂t=∇⋅[Deff∇Ci]−∇⋅[uCi],[S39]where ϕ is the porosity of the medium, Ci is the mass concentration of the species, Deff is the effective diffusion coefficient (often in square meters per second), and u is the convective fluid velocity (64).

For a 1D case, where the diffusion coefficient and fluid velocity are constant along the simulated path, the advection–diffusion equation can be written asϕ∂Ci∂t=Deff∂2Ci∂r2−u∂Ci∂r.[S40]For part one of our nucleobase transport model (the nucleobase outflow portion), we set u = 0. This is because carbonaceous IDPs and meteoroid fragments are likely too small to attain noticeable interior pressure differences (thus the convective velocity within these bodies is probably negligible).

We do not consider hydrolysis in our nucleobase transport model, as we only intend on estimating nucleobase outflow and mixing timescales from these models (rather than the nucleobases remaining after these processes). Since nucleobase decay is uniform within the carbonaceous sources and WLPs, and is also very slow at WLP temperatures [t1/2 is approximately tens to hundreds of years (15)], it is not likely to affect the timescales of complete nucleobase outflow from the source or homogenization within the WLP. A nonzero amount of nucleobases will decompose during diffusion from the source, and during mixing within the WLP. However, this is considered in the final calculations of nucleobase accumulation within WLPs from each source (see Nucleobase Evolution Equation from IDPs and Nucleobase Evolution Equation from Meteorites).

The advection–diffusion equation also does not include adsorption or formation reactions. However, for the diffusion of soluble nucleobases from small porous environments which previously reached chemical equilibrium, the effects of these extra sources and sinks will probably be minimal. Also, to adjust the diffusion equation for a free water medium, one simply needs to set ϕ = 1, and Deff=Dfw.

The effective diffusion coefficient of a species is proportional to, but smaller than, its free water diffusion coefficient. Many equations exist for modeling the effective diffusion coefficient in porous media (65⇓⇓–68). These equations depend on variables such as the porosity, tortuosity, and constrictivity of the medium, which represent the void space fraction, the curves in the pores, and the bottleneck effect, respectively. These equations are listed in Table S3.

View this table:
Table S3.

Different equations for modeling the effective diffusion coefficient of species in porous media

Carbonaceous meteorites of type CM, CR, and CI have average porosities of 24.7%, 9.5%, and 35.0% (69). Based on the relative fall frequency of these meteorites on Earth (22), the weighted average porosity of these meteorite types is ∼25%. Chondritic IDPs have similar porosities to carbonaceous chondrites (61); therefore, a 25% porosity may also represent well the nucleobase-containing IDPs.

The constrictivity of a porous medium is only important when the size of the species is comparable to the diameter of the pores (68). Therefore, given that nucleobases are <1 nm in diameter and the bulk of pore diameters in, for example, the Acfer 094 carbonaceous chondrite, range from 20 nm to 200 nm (63), we can neglect δ from the listed models.

Tortuosities of chondritic meteorites have an average value of 1.45 (70), and the empirical exponent m for carbonaceous meteorites might be similar to that of nearshore sediments, with a value of 2 (68).

Finally, the free water diffusion coefficient of a single nucleobase has not been measured, however the free water diffusion coefficient of a single nucleotide is 400 μm⋅2s−1 (71). Since nucleotides are heavier than nucleobases by a ribose and phosphate molecule, they will likely diffuse slower than nucleobases. Therefore, 400 μm⋅2s−1 is a good estimate of the lower limit of the free water diffusion coefficient of a single nucleobase.

Using the above estimates, we calculate the effective diffusion coefficients for nucleobases in carbonaceous meteorites and IDPs using each of the four models and display them in their respective columns in Table S3. The average value of the effective diffusion coefficient across all four models is 5.36 ×10−11 m⋅2s−1.

As previously stated, convective velocity within the pores of carbonaceous IDPs and meteorites is considered negligible. However, this is not the case within 1- to 10-m-radius WLPs. Due to the day–night cycles of Earth, WLPs likely experienced a temperature gradient from the atmospherically exposed top of the pond to the constant geothermally heated base. Since convection is likely the dominant form of heat transport within hydrothermal ponds (72), convection cells would have formed, with warm (higher pressure) parcels of water flowing upward and recently cooled (lower pressure) parcels flowing downward.

The convective fluid velocity can be estimated with the equationu=gβΔTL[m⋅s−1],[S41]where g is the gravitational acceleration experienced by the fluid (meters per square second), β is the fluid’s volumetric thermal expansion coefficient (per kelvin), and ΔT is the temperature difference (kelvins) over a scale length L (meters) (73). The volumetric thermal expansion coefficients for water at 50 °C, 65 °C, and 80 °C are 4.7, 5.6, and 6.5 × 10−4 K−1, respectively (74).

Small ponds and even lakes can experience a temperature difference of 1 °C to 5 °C over the course of a day–night cycle (75). However, convection begins cycling water well before temperature differences of this magnitude are reached. To estimate the lower bound of a constant temperature difference between the surface and the base of a WLP during a day-to-night period, we assume that each convection cycle cools a surface parcel of water by ΔT. Then, given ΔT, we match the corresponding cycle length and number of cycles with the ∼12-h period required for a 1 °C change in pond temperature. The equation for this calculation is summarized asΔT=(2LTcPdngβL)23[K],[S42]where Tc is the change in pond temperature over a day-to-night period (kelvins) and Pdn is the duration of that period (seconds).

Using Eq. S42, the minimum constant temperature difference between the surface and the base of a cylindrical WLP with a radius and depth of 1 m, at 65 °C, is ∼0.007 K. For a WLP with a radius and depth of 10 m, this minimum constant temperature difference increases to ∼0.016 K. However, given that smaller ponds experience greater temperature changes than larger ponds due to faster heat transfer, a ΔT of ∼0.01 K may be a reasonable lower-bound estimate for all WLPs in the 1- to 10-m-radius/depth range.

Given a constant temperature difference of 0.01 K between the base and surface of 1-, 5-, and 10-m-deep WLPs at around 65 °C, the convective flow velocities would be ∼0.7, 1.7, and 2.4 cm⋅s−1, respectively.

Due to the 1D nature of our simulations, we are assuming a radially symmetric outflow of nucleobases from spherical carbonaceous IDPs and meteorites. We also assume that local concentrations of nucleobases that recently flowed out of these sources will remain within a single convection cell. Lastly, we assume that the nucleobase homogenization timescale within a 1D convection cell of a WLP is mostly representative of the nucleobase homogenization timescale within the entire WLP. Although the 1D handling of this part of our model is a simplification of advection and diffusion within WLPs, since we are only attempting to estimate nucleobase homogenization timescales to within a few factors, a 1D model is probably sufficient.

For both model parts, we use a backward time, centered space (BTCS) finite difference method for the diffusion term in the advection–diffusion equation. For part two of the model, we use the upwind method to approximate the additional advection term. The BTCS method was selected over the more accurate Crank–Nicolson method based on the former’s stability for sharply edged initial conditions and convergence for increasing levels of refinement. However, differences in diffusion timescales are found to be within rounding error upon comparison of these methods for a 100-μm carbonaceous IDP. The upwind method was selected over higher-order advection approximation methods (e.g., Beam–Warming, Lax–Wendroff) due to its lack of spurious oscillations, lowest error accumulation in mass conservation tests, and convergence for increasing levels of refinement. These two models are summarized in Table S4.

View this table:
Table S4.

Summary of parts one and two of our 1D nucleobase transport model

For part one of our nucleobase transport model, the simulation frame starts at the center of the IDP or meteorite, and ends at the rock–pond interface. The left (r = 0) boundary is Neumann (i.e., ∂Ci/∂t = 0 across the boundary), simulating zero inflow, and the right boundary is open (i.e., ∂Ci/∂t before the boundary equals ∂Ci/∂t after the boundary), simulating outflow into the WLP. The nucleobase contents of the modeled sources are initially homogeneous, but drop sharply to zero at the open boundary (i.e., the initial condition represents an exponentially smoothed step function). This is made to represent the searing of the outermost layer of carbonaceous IDPs and meteorites from atmospheric entry heating.

For part two, the simulation frame is an eccentric 1D convection cell, which loops between the bottom and the top of the WLP (length = 2rp). The convection cell is modeled with cyclic boundaries, i.e., continuous nucleobase flow, and no nucleobases exit the convection cell. The initial concentration of nucleobases is a sharp Gaussian beginning at the base of the pond. The width of the spike is ∼1% of the WLP’s radius.

Example simulations, including initial conditions, for parts one and two of our nucleobase transport model are plotted in Fig. S12. Because the time it takes for complete nucleobase outflow from a source, or complete nucleobase homogenization in a WLP, is independent of initial nucleobase abundance, the solution to the diffusion equation at each grid point is displayed as a fraction of the total initial nucleobase concentration. For ease of viewing, part two of the model is displayed in the convection cell’s moving frame, with coordinate r′ = r - uΔt.

Fig. S12.
Fig. S12.

Example simulations, including the initial conditions, for our two-part nucleobase transport model. Each line represents a different snapshot in time. (A) Initially homogeneous nucleobase diffusion from a 100-μm-radius carbonaceous IDP. (B) Initially locally concentrated nucleobase mixing in a convection cell within a 1-m-deep WLP. The convection cell is an L = 2rp eccentric loop flowing between the bottom and the top of the WLP. This loop is sliced at r′ = 1 m in the convection cell’s moving frame and unraveled for display in the 1D plot in B.

Meteorite Sources and Targets

In Fig. 1A, we show the history of meteoritic mass delivery rates on early Earth, and of WLP targets. From total meteoritic mass, we extract just the nucleobase sources, i.e., only carbonaceous meteoroids whose fragments slow to terminal velocity in the early atmosphere. In Fig. 1B, we show the history of depositions of such nucleobase sources into 1- to 10-m-radius WLP targets from 4.5 Ga to 3.7 Ga.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.

History of carbonaceous meteorite deposition in WLPs. (A) History of mass delivery rate to early Earth and of effective WLP surface area. Three models for mass delivered to early Earth are compared: an LHB model and a minimum and a maximum bombardment model. All mass delivery models are based on analyses of the lunar cratering record (6, 21). The effective WLP surface area during the Hadean Eon is based on a continental crust growth model (29), the number of lakes and ponds per unit crustal area (23), and the lake and pond size distribution (23). (B) Cumulative WLP depositions for the small fragments of carbonaceous meteoroids of diameter 40 m to 80 m landing in any 1- to 10-m-radius WLP on early Earth. A deposition is characterized as a meteoroid debris field that overlaps with a WLP. We assume the ponds per area during the Hadean Eon is the same as today, and that all continental crust remains above sea level; however, we vary the ponds per area by plus or minus one order of magnitude to obtain error bars. Ninety-five percent of WLP depositions in each model occur before the corresponding dotted vertical line; 40 m to 80 m is the optimal range of carbonaceous meteoroid diameters to reach terminal velocity, while still landing a substantial fraction of mass within a WLP area; and 1 m to 10 m is the optimal range of WLP radii to avoid complete evaporation within a few months, while also allowing nonnegligible nucleobase concentrations to be reached upon meteorite deposition. The numbers of carbonaceous meteoroid impactors in the 20- to 40-m-radius range are based on the mass delivery rate, the main-belt size-frequency distribution, and the fraction of impactors that are Mighei type, Renazzo type, or Ivuna type (6, 21, 22) (see SI Text).

The lunar cratering record either shows a continuously decreasing rate of impacts from 4.5 Ga forward or shows a brief outburst beginning at ∼3.9 Ga known as the Late Heavy Bombardment (LHB). Due to the lack of lunar impact melts with ages before ∼3.92 Ga, the rate of mass delivered to early Earth preceding this date is uncertain (30). Therefore, we compare three models for mass delivery to early Earth based on analytical fits to the lunar cratering record (6, 21): an LHB and a minimum and a maximum bombardment model. The latter two models represent lower and upper limit fits for a sustained declining bombardment, and are subject to considerable uncertainty (31). The total target area of WLPs increases as the rising continents provide greater surface area for pond sites. An ocean world, in this view, is an implausible environment for the emergence of an RNA world. Iron and rocky bodies impact the solid surface at speeds high enough to form small craters (32), contributing to the WLP population.

Our calculations show that 10 to 3,840 terminal velocity carbon-rich meteoroids would have deposited their fragments into WLPs on Earth during the Hadean Eon. Given the large uncertainty of the ponds per unit area and the growth rate of continental crust, we vary the WLP growth function by ±1 order of magnitude. From this, we get a minimum of 1 to 384 depositions and a maximum of 100 to 38,400 WLP depositions from 4.5 Ga to 3.7 Ga. The optimal model for WLP depositions—the maximum bombardment model—suggests the majority of depositions occurred before 4.17 Ga. The less optimal models for WLP depositions, the LHB and minimum bombardment models, suggest the majority of depositions occurred before 3.82 Ga and 3.77 Ga, respectively.

Life Cycles of WLPs

Fig. 2 illustrates the variation of physical conditions for WLPs during the Hadean Eon, ∼4.5 Ga to 3.7 Ga. Annual rainfall varies sinusoidally (24), creating seasonal wet and dry environments. The increased heat flow from greater abundances of radiogenic sources at this time (33) causes temperatures of around 50 °C to 80 °C (34). The various factors that control the water level and thus the wet–dry cycles of WLPs are precipitation, evaporation, and seepage (through pores in the ground).

Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.

An illustration of the sources and sinks of pond water and nucleobases in our model of isolated WLPs on early Earth. The only water source is precipitation. Water sinks include evaporation and seepage. Nucleobase sources include carbonaceous IDPs and meteorites, which carry up to ∼1 pg and ∼3 mg, respectively, of each nucleobase. Nucleobase sinks include hydrolysis, UV photodissociation, and seepage. Nucleobase hydrolysis and seepage are only activated when the pond is wet, and UV photodissociation is only activated when the pond is dry.

In Fig. 3A, we present the results of these calculations. We select two different temperatures (65 °C and 20 °C) as analogues for hot and warm early Earths. For each of these, we examine three different environments: dry, intermediate, and wet (see Table 1 for details). The water levels in the wet environment WLPs range from ∼60 to 100% full. WLPs experiencing dry states of approximately half (intermediate environment) and three quarters of a year (dry environment) only fill up to 20% and 10%, respectively. These results clearly establish the existence of seasonal wet–dry cycles.

Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.

Histories of pond water and adenine concentration from IDPs. (A) The change in water level over time in our fiducial dry, intermediate, and wet environment WLPs due to evaporation, seepage, and precipitation. Precipitation rates from a variety of locations on Earth today are used in the models, and represent two classes of matching early Earth analogues: hot (Columbia, Indonesia, Cameroon) and warm (Thailand, Brazil, and Mexico) (for details, see Table 1). All models begin with an empty pond, and stabilize within 2 y. (B) The red and black-dotted curves represent the adenine concentrations over time from carbonaceous IDPs in our fiducial WLPs. The degenerate intermediate WLP environment used in this calculation is for a hot early Earth at 65 °C and a warm early Earth at 20 °C. The blue curve represents the corresponding water level in the WLP, with initial empty and full states labeled vertically. Three features are present: (1) the maximum adenine concentration at the onset of the dry phase, (2) a flat-top equilibrium between incoming adenine from IDPs and adenine destruction by UV irradiation, and (3) the minimum adenine concentration just before the pond water reaches its highest level. BRA, Brazil; CAM, Cameroon; COL, Columbia; Env, environment; IDN, Indonesia; MEX, Mexico; THA, Thailand.

View this table:
Table 1.

Precipitation models matching dry, intermediate, and wet environments on a warm (5 °C to 35 °C) and hot (50 °C to 80 °C) early Earth

Nucleobase Evolution in WLPs

As shown in Fig. 2, the buildup of nucleobases in WLPs is offset by losses due to hydrolysis (28), seepage (26), and dissociation by UV radiation that was incident on early Earth in the absence of ozone (27, 36). Some protection would be afforded during WLP wet phases, as a 1-m column of pond water can absorb UV radiation up to ∼95% (37). It is of particular interest that sediment, which collects at the base of WLPs, also attenuates UV radiation. Studies show it only takes a ∼0.6-mm layer of basaltic sediment to attenuate UV radiation by >99.99% (38).

Nucleotide formation and stability are sensitive to temperature. Phosphorylation of nucleosides in the laboratory is slower at low temperatures, taking a few weeks at 65 °C compared with a couple of hours at 100 °C (39). The stability of nucleotides on the other hand, is favored in warm conditions over high temperatures (40). If a WLP is too hot (>80 °C), any newly formed nucleotides within it will hydrolyze in several days to a few years (40). At temperatures of 5 °C to 35 °C that either characterize more-temperate latitudes or a postsnowball Earth, nucleotides can survive for thousand-to-million-year timescales. However, at such temperatures, nucleotide formation would be very slow. Considering this temperature sensitivity, we model the evolution of nucleobases in WLPs in matching warm (5 °C to 35 °C) and hot (50 °C to 80 °C) early Earth environments. Hotter ponds evaporate more quickly; therefore, we choose rainier analogue sites on a hot early Earth to maintain identical pond environments to our warm early Earth sites.

In Fig. 3B, we focus on the adenine concentrations in WLPs from only IDP sources. The combination of spikes, flat tops, and troughs in Fig. 3B reflects the variations of adenine concentration in response to drying, balance of input and destruction rates, and precipitation during wet periods. In any environment and at any modeled temperature, the maximum adenine concentration from only IDP sources remains below 2×10 −7 ppb (Fig. S1). This is two orders of magnitude below current detection limits (14), making subsequent reactions negligible. The nucleobase mass fraction curves are practically independent of pond size (1 m < rp ≤ 10 m) once a stable, seasonal pattern is reached (<35 y). This is because, although larger ponds have a larger collecting area for IDPs, they have an equivalent larger area for collecting precipitation and seeping nucleobases.

Fig. S1.
Fig. S1.

The accumulation of adenine from only carbonaceous IDP sources in cylindrical WLPs with radii and depths of 1 m. The three curves (dry, intermediate, and wet environments) differ by their precipitation rates, which are from a variety of locations on Earth today, and represent two classes of matching early Earth analogues: hot (Columbia, Indonesia, Cameroon) and warm (Thailand, Brazil, and Mexico) (for details see Table 1). (A) The degenerate WLP models used for these calculations correspond to a hot early Earth at 65 °C and a warm early Earth at 20 °C. (B) The degenerate WLP models used for these calculations correspond to a hot early Earth at 50 °C and a warm early Earth at 5 °C. Env, environment.

Dominant Source of Surviving Nucleobases

In Fig. 4, we assemble all of these results and compare carbonaceous IDPs to meteorites as sources of adenine to our fiducial WLPs. Small meteorite fragments (1 cm in radius) are compared with IDPs in Fig. 4A. The effects of larger meteorite fragments (5 cm and 10 cm) on adenine concentration are displayed in Fig. 4B.

Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.

Comparative histories of adenine concentrations from IDPs and meteorites. (A) A comparison of the accumulation of adenine from carbonaceous IDPs and meteorites in our fiducial WLPs. The meteorite fragments are small (1 cm), and originate from a 40-m-radius carbonaceous meteoroid. Adenine concentrations for intermediate (wet–dry cycle) and wet environments (never dry) are compared and correspond to both a hot early Earth at 65 °C and a warm early Earth at 20 °C (for details, see Table 1). (B) The effect of meteorite fragment sizes on adenine concentration. The degenerate intermediate WLP environment used in these calculations is for a hot early Earth at 65 °C and a warm early Earth at 20 °C. The fragments are either only small in size (1 cm in radius), only medium in size (5 cm in radius), or only large in size (10 cm in radius). Three features are present: (1) Adenine is at its highest concentration at the onset of the pond’s dry phase. (2) Upon drying, adenine ceases to outflow from large fragments, and UV radiation rapidly destroys all previously released adenine. (3) Rewetting allows the remaining adenine within large fragment pores to continue to outflow. The U shape is due to the increase and decrease in water level. Env, environment.

The maximum adenine concentration in our model WLPs from carbonaceous meteorites is 10 orders of magnitude higher than the maximum adenine concentration from carbonaceous IDPs. The reason for this huge disparity is simply that carbonaceous meteoroid fragments—each carrying up to a few milligrams of adenine—are deposited into a WLP in a single event. This allows adenine to reach parts per billion–parts per million-level concentrations before seepage and UV photodissociation efficiently remove it from the WLP in one to a few wet–dry cycles. The maximum guanine and uracil accumulated in our model WLPs from meteorites are also more than 10 orders of magnitude higher than those accumulated from IDPs (Figs. S2 and S3). A maximum adenine concentration of 2 ppm is still approximately one to two orders of magnitude lower than the initial adenine concentrations in aqueous experiments forming adenosine and AMP (2); however, these experiments only ran for an hour.

Fig. S2.
Fig. S2.

The accumulation of guanine, adenine, uracil, and cytosine from only carbonaceous IDP sources in cylindrical WLPs with radii and depths of 1 m. The degenerate dry WLP models used for these calculations correspond to a hot early Earth at 65 °C and a warm early Earth at 20 °C. Precipitation rates from Cameroon and Mexico on Earth today are used to represent the hot and warm early Earth analogues, respectively (for details, see Table 1). The cytosine abundance in IDPs used to calculate the maximum cytosine curve matches the average abundance of guanine in IDPs (Table S2). The curves are obtained by numerically solving Eq. S34.

Fig. S3.
Fig. S3.

The accumulation of guanine, adenine, and uracil from 1-cm fragments of an initially 40-m-radius carbonaceous meteoroid in cylindrical WLPs with radii and depths of 1 m. The degenerate WLP models used for these calculations correspond to a hot early Earth at 65 °C and a warm early Earth at 20 °C. The two curves for each nucleobase differ by their precipitation rates, which create intermediate (solid lines) and wet (dotted lines) environments, and are from a variety of locations on Earth today, representing two classes of matching early Earth analogues: hot (Columbia, Indonesia) and warm (Thailand, Brazil) (for details, see Table 1). The curves are obtained by numerically solving Equation S38. Env, environment.

Adenine within larger fragments diffuses over several wet–dry cycles, and, during the dry phase, no outflow occurs. For fragments 1, 5, and 10 cm in radius, 99% of the adenine is released into the pond water within ∼10 d, 8 mo, and 32 mo, respectively (Fig. S4). Only the adenine that has already flowed out of the fragments gets rapidly photodestroyed; therefore, adenine within larger fragments can survive up to ∼7 y.

Fig. S4.
Fig. S4.

Fraction of the total initial nucleobases remaining in (A) a 100-μm-radius IDP and (B) 1-, 5-, and 10-cm-radii meteorites over time as a result of diffusion across a rock–pond boundary. The IDP and meteorites are considered to be lying on the bottom of a WLP, and are diffusing nucleobases symmetrically in the radial direction. The times at which 99% of the initial contained nucleobases have diffused into the WLP are labeled on the plots.

Thus, even though the carbon delivery rates from IDPs to early Earth vastly exceed those from meteorites, it is the meteoritic material that is the dominant source of nucleobases for RNA synthesis.

Nucleotide and RNA Synthesis

To form nucleotides in WLPs, ribose and a reduced P source must be available. Ribose may have formed and stabilized in borate-rich WLPs via the formose reaction (polymerization of H2CO) (41). Additionally, phosphite has been detected in a pristine geothermal pool representative of early Earth, suggesting the potential availability of reduced P to WLP environments (42). Only the AMP nucleotide has been experimentally synthesized in a single step involving ribose, reduced P, and UV radiation (2).

Because of the rapid rate of seepage [∼1.0 mm⋅d−1 to 5.1 mm⋅d−1 (26)], nucleotide synthesis would need to be fast, occurring within a half-year to a few years after nucleobase deposition, depending on meteoroid fragment sizes. This is ample time given that laboratory experiments show that hour-to-week-long timescales are sufficient to form adenosine and AMP (2, 3).

Nucleotides, once synthesized using meteorite-delivered nucleobases, are still subject to seepage, regardless of the temperature. Therefore, nucleotide polymerization into RNA would also need to be fast, occurring within one to a few wet–dry cycles, to reduce their likelihood of seeping through the estimated 0.001- to 400-μm-sized pores at the WLP base (43). Experiments show that nucleotides can polymerize into RNA chains possibly greater than 300 monomers by subjecting them to just 1 to 16 wet–dry cycles (8).

Discussion and Conclusions

Seepage is one of the dominant nucleobase sinks in WLPs. It will be drastically reduced if nucleobases are encapsulated by vesicles (spheres of size 0.5 μm to 5 μm that form spontaneously upon hydration, whose walls consist of lipid bilayers derived from fatty acids within meteorites) (44). However, even if seepage is turned off, maximum adenine concentrations from IDPs are still negligible [≲150 ppq (parts per quadrillion)] (Fig. S5).

Fig. S5.
Fig. S5.

The no seepage limit: the accumulation of adenine from only carbonaceous IDP sources in cylindrical WLPs with radii and depths of 1 m. The two curves represent the adenine concentrations in a wet environment pond on a hot (65 °C) and warm (20 °C) early Earth (for details, see Table 1). The thickness of the lines is due to the seasonal oscillations in adenine concentrations. Env, environment.

Also, we note that a cold early Earth [if it occurred (30)] with seasonal or impact-induced freeze–thaw cycles could also be suitable for RNA polymerization and evolution for reasons similar to those we have analyzed for WLPs. The cyclic thawing and freezing resembles wet–dry cycles (8).

We conclude that the physical and chemical conditions of WLPs place strong constraints on the emergence of an RNA world. A hot early Earth (50 °C to 80 °C) favors rapid nucleotide synthesis in WLPs (39). Meteorite-delivered nucleobases could react with ribose and a reduced P source to quickly (less than a few years) create nucleotides for polymerization. Polymerization then occurs in one to a few wet–dry cycles to reduce the likelihood that these molecules are lost to seepage. This rapid process also reduces the likelihood of setbacks for the emergence of the RNA world due to frequent large impacts, also known as impact frustration (45). Sedimentation would be of critical importance as UV protection for nucleobases, nucleotides, and RNA (27, 46, 47).

The mass delivery model providing the most WLP depositions indicates that the majority of meteorite depositions occurred before 4.17 Ga. The first RNA polymers would have formed in WLPs around that time, prefiguring the emergence of the RNA world. This implies that the RNA world could have appeared within ∼200 to 300 million years after Earth became habitable.

Acknowledgments

We thank the referees for their thoughtful insights. We thank M. Rheinstädter for providing valuable comments on the manuscript. B.K.D.P. thanks the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy for their hospitality during his summer abroad, supported by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Michael Smith Foreign Study Supplement. R.E.P. thanks the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy and the Institute of Theoretical Astrophysics for their support during his sabbatical leave. The research of B.K.D.P. was supported by an NSERC Canada Graduate Scholarship and Ontario Graduate Scholarship. R.E.P. is supported by an NSERC Discovery Grant. This research is part of a collaboration between the Origins Institute and the Heidelberg Initiative for the Origins of Life.

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: pearcbe{at}mcmaster.ca.

  • Author contributions: B.K.D.P., R.E.P., D.A.S., and T.K.H. designed research; B.K.D.P. performed research; B.K.D.P. and R.E.P. analyzed data; and B.K.D.P., R.E.P., D.A.S., and T.K.H. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

  • See Commentary on page 11264.

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1710339114/-/DCSupplemental.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Gilbert W
    (1986) Origin of life: The RNA world. Nature 319:618.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. ↵
    1. Ponnamperuma C,
    2. Sagan C,
    3. Mariner R
    (1963) Synthesis of adenosine triphosphate under possible primitive Earth conditions. Nature 199:222–226.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Gull M, et al.
    (2015) Nucleoside phosphorylation by the mineral schreibersite. Sci Rep 5:17198.
    .
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Nutman AP,
    2. Bennett VC,
    3. Friend CRL,
    4. Van Kranendonk MJ,
    5. Chivas AR
    (2016) Rapid emergence of life shown by discovery of 3,700-million-year-old microbial structures. Nature 537:535–538.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. ↵
    1. Ohtomo Y,
    2. Kakegawa T,
    3. Ishida A,
    4. Nagase T,
    5. Rosing MT
    (2014) Evidence for biogenic graphite in early Archaean Isua metasedimentary rocks. Nat Geosci 7:25–28.
    .
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Chyba CF
    (1990) Impact delivery and erosion of planetary oceans in the early inner solar system. Nature 343:129–133.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. ↵
    1. Bland PA, et al.
    (1996) The flux of meteorites to the Earth over the last 50,000 years. Mon Not R Astron Soc 283:551–565.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. ↵
    1. Da Silva L,
    2. Maurel MC,
    3. Deamer D
    (2015) Salt-promoted synthesis of RNA-like molecules in simulated hydrothermal conditions. J Mol Evol 80:86–97.
    .
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Orgel LE
    (2004) Prebiotic chemistry and the origin of the RNA world. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 39:99–123.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Trail D,
    2. Watson EB,
    3. Tailby ND
    (2011) The oxidation state of Hadean magmas and implications for early Earth’s atmosphere. Nature 480:79–82.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Chyba C,
    2. Sagan C
    (1992) Endogenous production, exogenous delivery and impact-shock synthesis of organic molecules: An inventory for the origins of life. Nature 355:125–132.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Nuevo M,
    2. Materese CK,
    3. Sandford SA
    (2014) The photochemistry of pyrimidine in realistic astrophysical ices and the production of nucleobases. Astrophys J 793:125.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. ↵
    1. Pearce BKD,
    2. Pudritz RE
    (2015) Seeding the pregenetic Earth: Meteoritic abundances of nucleobases and potential reaction pathways. Astrophys J 807:85.
    .
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Callahan MP, et al.
    (2011) Carbonaceous meteorites contain a wide range of extraterrestrial nucleobases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:13995–13998.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Pearce BKD,
    2. Pudritz RE
    (2016) Meteorites and the RNA world: A thermodynamic model of nucleobase synthesis within planetesimals. Astrobiology 16:853–872.
    .
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Salinas VN, et al.
    (2016) First detection of gas-phase ammonia in a planet-forming disk. NH3, N2H+, and H2O in the disk around TW Hydrae. Astron Astrophys 591:A122.
    .
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Pascucci I, et al.
    (2009) The different evolution of gas and dust in disks around Sun-like and cool stars. Astrophys J 696:143–159.
    .
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Schoonen MAA,
    2. Xu Y
    (2001) Nitrogen reduction under hydrothermal vent conditions: Implications for the prebiotic synthesis of C-H-O-N compounds. Astrobiology 1:133–142.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Ferris JP,
    2. Hill AR,
    3. Liu R,
    4. Orgel LE
    (1996) Synthesis of long prebiotic oligomers on mineral surfaces. Nature 381:59–61.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Burcar BT, et al.
    (2015) RNA oligomerization in laboratory analogues of alkaline hydrothermal vent systems. Astrobiology 15:509–522.
    .
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Abramov O,
    2. Mojzsis SJ
    (2009) Microbial habitability of the Hadean Earth during the late heavy bombardment. Nature 459:419–422.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Burbine TH,
    2. McCoy TJ,
    3. Meibom A,
    4. Gladman B,
    5. Keil K
    (2002) in Meteoritic Parent Bodies: Their Number and Identification, eds Bottke WF Jr, Cellino A, Paolicchi P, Binzel RP (Univ Ariz Press, Tucson, AZ), pp 653–667.
    .
  23. ↵
    1. Downing JA, et al.
    (2006) The global abundance and size distribution of lakes, ponds, and impoundments. Limnol Oceanogr 51:2388–2397.
    .
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. Berghuijs WR,
    2. Woods RA
    (2016) A simple framework to quantitatively describe monthly precipitation and temperature climatology. Int J Climatol 36:3161–3174.
    .
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. Boyd CE
    (1985) Pond evaporation. Trans Am Fish Soc 114:299–303.
    .
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    1. Boyd CE
    (1982) Hydrology of small experimental fish ponds at Auburn, Alabama. Trans Am Fish Soc 111:638–644.
    .
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. Poch O, et al.
    (2015) Effect of nontronite smectite clay on the chemical evolution of several organic molecules under simulated martian surface ultraviolet radiation conditions. Astrobiology 15:221–237.
    .
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Levy M,
    2. Miller SL
    (1998) The stability of the RNA bases: Implications for the origin of life. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:7933–7938.
    .
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. McCulloch MT,
    2. Bennett VC
    (1993) Evolution of the early Earth: Constraints from 143Nd-142Nd isotopic systematics. Lithos 30:237–255.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. ↵
    1. Zahnle K, et al.
    (2007) Emergence of a habitable planet. Space Sci Rev 129:35–78.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. ↵
    1. Chyba CF
    (1991) Terrestrial mantle siderophiles and the lunar impact record. Icarus 92:217–233.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  32. ↵
    1. Hills JG,
    2. Goda MP
    (1993) The fragmentation of small asteroids in the atmosphere. Astron J 105:1114–1144.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  33. ↵
    1. Sleep NH
    (2010) The Hadean-Archaean environment. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biol 2:a002527.
    .
    OpenUrl
  34. ↵
    1. Cockell CS
    (2015) Astrobiology: Understanding Life in the Universe (Wiley, Chichester, UK).
    .
    1. Reichle RH, et al.
    (2011) Assessment and enhancement of MERRA land surface hydrology estimates. J Clim 24:6322–6338.
    .
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    1. Rugheimer S,
    2. Segura A,
    3. Kaltenegger L,
    4. Sasselov D
    (2015) UV surface environment of Earth-like planets orbiting FGKM stars through geological evolution. Astrophys J 806:137.
    .
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    1. Wozniak B,
    2. Dera J
    (2007) Light absorption by water molecules and inorganic substances dissolved in sea water. Light Absorption in Sea Water, Atmospheric andOceanographic Sciences Library (Springer, New York), Vol 33, pp 11–81.
    .
  38. ↵
    1. Carrier BL,
    2. Beegle LW,
    3. Bhartia R,
    4. Abbey WJ
    (2017) Attenuation of UV radiation in rocks and minerals: Implications for biosignature preservation and detection on Mars. Lunar Planet Sci Conf 48:2678.
    .
    OpenUrl
  39. ↵
    1. Handschuh GJ,
    2. Lohrmann R,
    3. Orgel LE
    (1973) The effect of Mg2+ and Ca2+ on urea-catalyzed phosphorylation reactions. J Mol Evol 2:251–262.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Hulett HR
    (1970) Non-enzymatic hydrolysis of adenosine phosphates. Nature 225:1248–1249.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Furukawa Y,
    2. Horiuchi M,
    3. Kakegawa T
    (2013) Selective stabilization of ribose by borate. Orig Life Evol Biosph 43:353–361.
    .
    OpenUrl
  42. ↵
    1. Pech H, et al.
    (2009) Detection of geothermal phosphite using high-performance liquid chromatography. Environ Sci Technol 43:7671–7675.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Tugrul A
    (1997) Change in pore size distribution due to weathering of basalts and its engineering significance. Proceedings: International Symposium on Engineering Geology and the Environment, eds Marinos PG, Koukis GC, Tsiambaos GC, Stournaras GC (Balkema, Rotterdam), Vol 1, pp 71–90.
    .
    OpenUrl
  44. ↵
    1. Damer B,
    2. Deamer DW
    (2015) Coupled phases and combinatorial selection in fluctuating hydrothermal pools: A scenario to guide experimental approaches to the origin of cellular life. Life 5:872–887.
    .
    OpenUrl
  45. ↵
    1. Zahnle K,
    2. Sleep NH
    (2006) Impacts and the early evolution of life. Comets and the Origin and Evolution of Life, eds Thomas PJ, Hicks RD, Chyba CF, McKay CP (Springer, Berlin), pp 207–251.
    .
  46. ↵
    1. Dodonova NY,
    2. Kiseleva MN,
    3. Remisova LA,
    4. Tsycganenko NM
    (1982) The vacuum ultraviolet photochemistry of nucleotides. Photochem Photobiol 35:129–132.
    .
    OpenUrlPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Kladwang W,
    2. Hum J,
    3. Das R
    (2012) Ultraviolet shadowing of RNA can cause significant chemical damage in seconds. Sci Rep 2:517.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Van Kranendonk MJ
    (2010) Two types of Archean continental crust: Plume and plate tectonics on early Earth. Am J Sci 310:1187–1209.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    1. Kenkmann T, et al.
    (2009) The Carancas meteorite impact crater, Peru: Geologic surveying and modeling of crater formation and atmospheric passage. Meteoritics 44:985–1000.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  50. ↵
    1. Clarke RS Jr, et al.
    (1971) The Allende, Mexico, meteorite shower. Smithson Contrib Earth Sci 5:1–53.
    .
    OpenUrl
  51. ↵
    1. Strom RG,
    2. Malhotra R,
    3. Ito T,
    4. Yoshida F,
    5. Kring DA
    (2005) The origin of planetary impactors in the inner solar system. Science 309:1847–1850.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    1. Bottke WF, et al.
    (2005) The fossilized size distribution of the main asteroid belt. Icarus 175:111–140.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  53. ↵
    1. Ehrenfreund P,
    2. Glavin DP,
    3. Botta O,
    4. Cooper G,
    5. Bada JL
    (2001) Special feature: Extraterrestrial amino acids in Orgueil and Ivuna: Tracing the parent body of CI type carbonaceous chondrites. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:2138–2141.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. ↵
    1. Weisstein EW
    (2002) CRC Concise Encyclopedia of Mathematics (CRC, Boca Raton, FL), 2nd Ed.
    .
  55. ↵
    1. Lang B,
    2. Kowalski M
    (1971) On the possible number of mass fragments from Pultusk meteorite shower, 1868. Meteoritics 6:149–158.
    .
    OpenUrl
  56. ↵
    1. Consolmagno GJ,
    2. Macke RJ,
    3. Rochette P,
    4. Britt DT,
    5. Gattacceca J
    (2006) Density, magnetic susceptibility, and the characterization of ordinary chondrite falls and showers. Meteoritics 41:331–342.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  57. ↵
    1. Bounama C,
    2. Franck S,
    3. von Bloh W
    (2001) The fate of Earth’s ocean. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 5:569–575.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  58. ↵
    1. Evans NL,
    2. Bennett CJ,
    3. Ullrich S,
    4. Kaiser RI
    (2011) On the interaction of adenine with ionizing radiation: Mechanistical studies and astrobiological implications. Astrophys J 730:69.
    .
    OpenUrl
  59. ↵
    1. Kua J,
    2. Bada JL
    (2011) Primordial ocean chemistry and its compatibility with the RNA world. Orig Life Evol Biosph 41:553–558.
    .
    OpenUrlPubMed
  60. ↵
    1. Cockell CS
    (2002) in The Ultraviolet Radiation Environment of Earth and Mars: Past and Present, eds Horneck G, Baumstark-Khan C (Springer, Berlin), pp 219–232.
    .
  61. ↵
    1. Corrigan CM, et al.
    (1997) The porosity and permeability of chondritic meteorites and interplanetary dust particles. Meteoritics 32:509–515.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  62. ↵
    1. Matrajt G,
    2. Brownlee D,
    3. Sadilek M,
    4. Kruse L
    (2006) Survival of organic phases in porous IDPs during atmospheric entry: A pulse-heating study. Meteoritics 41:903–911.
    .
    OpenUrl
  63. ↵
    1. Bland PA, et al.
    (2009) Why aqueous alteration in asteroids was isochemical: High porosity ≠ high permeability. Earth Planet Sci Lett 287:559–568.
    .
    OpenUrl
  64. ↵
    1. Palguta J,
    2. Schubert G,
    3. Travis BJ
    (2010) Fluid flow and chemical alteration in carbonaceous chondrite parent bodies. Earth Planet Sci Lett 296:235–243.
    .
    OpenUrl
  65. ↵
    1. Saripalli KP,
    2. Serne RJ,
    3. Meyer PD,
    4. McGrail BP
    (2002) Prediction of diffusion coefficients in porous media using tortuosity factors based on interfacial areas. Ground Water 40:346–352.
    .
    OpenUrlPubMed
  66. ↵
    1. van Brakel J,
    2. Heertjes PM
    (1974) Analysis of diffusion in macroporous media in terms of a porosity, a tortuosity and a constrictivity factor. Int J Heat Mass Transfer 17:1093–1103.
    .
    OpenUrl
  67. ↵
    1. Caré S
    (2003) Influence of aggregates on chloride diffusion coefficient into mortar. Cem Conc Res 33:1021–1028.
    .
    OpenUrl
  68. ↵
    1. Boving TB,
    2. Grathwohl P
    (2001) Tracer diffusion coefficients in sedimentary rocks: Correlation to porosity and hydraulic conductivity. J Contam Hydrol 53:85–100.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. ↵
    1. Macke RJ,
    2. Consolmagno GJ,
    3. Britt DT
    (2011) Density, porosity, and magnetic susceptibility of carbonaceous chondrites. Meteoritics 46:1842–1862.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  70. ↵
    1. El Abassi D,
    2. Ibhi A,
    3. Faiz B,
    4. Aboudaoud I
    (2013) A simple method for the determination of the porosity and tortuosity of meteorites with ultrasound. J Geophys Eng 10:055003.
    .
    OpenUrl
  71. ↵
    1. Baaske P, et al.
    (2007) Extreme accumulation of nucleotides in simulated hydrothermal pore systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:9346–9351.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  72. ↵
    1. Domenico PA,
    2. Palciauskas VV
    (1973) Theoretical analysis of forced convective heat transfer in regional ground-water flow. Geol Soc Am Bull 84:3803–3814.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  73. ↵
    1. Sheremet MA
    (2013) Mathematical simulation of nonstationary regimes of natural convection in a cubical enclosure with finite-thickness heat-conducting walls. J Eng Thermophys 22:298–308.
    .
    OpenUrl
  74. ↵
    1. Otero L,
    2. Molina-García AD,
    3. Sans PD
    (2002) Some interrelated thermophysical properties of liquid water and ice. I. A user-friendly modeling review for food high-pressure processing. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 42:339–352.
    .
    OpenUrlPubMed
  75. ↵
    1. Jacobs AFG,
    2. Heusinkveld BG,
    3. Kraai A,
    4. Paaijmans KP
    (2008) Diurnal temperature fluctuations in an artificial small shallow water body. Int J Biometeorol 52:271–280.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Request Permissions
Fate of nucleobases in warm little ponds
Ben K. D. Pearce, Ralph E. Pudritz, Dmitry A. Semenov, Thomas K. Henning
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Oct 2017, 114 (43) 11327-11332; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1710339114
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo

You May Also be Interested in

A study uncovers genetic evidence of early colonization of Jamaica by primates and suggests that adaptation can shape species morphology in novel environments, even when species come from morphologically conservative families. Image courtesy of Lorraine Meeker (American Museum of Natural History, New York).
Primate colonization of the Caribbean
A study uncovers genetic evidence of early colonization of Jamaica by primates and suggests that adaptation can shape species morphology in novel environments, even when species come from morphologically conservative families.
Image courtesy of Lorraine Meeker (American Museum of Natural History, New York).
Researchers report that some moth species use sound absorbing-scales to avoid detection by bats and suggest that the findings could aid the design of biologically inspired sound absorbers for an array of applications, including noise mitigation and building acoustics. Image courtesy of Thomas R. Neil.
How moth scales help avoid detection by bats
Researchers report that some moth species use sound absorbing-scales to avoid detection by bats and suggest that the findings could aid the design of biologically inspired sound absorbers for an array of applications, including noise mitigation and building acoustics.
Image courtesy of Thomas R. Neil.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 115 (50)
Current Issue

Submit

Jump to section