Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
Research Article

Competitive network determines the direction of the diversity–function relationship

Daniel S. Maynard, Thomas W. Crowther, and Mark A. Bradford
  1. aDepartment of Ecology & Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637;
  2. bSchool of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06511;
  3. cDepartment of Terrestrial Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology, 6708 -PB Wageningen, The Netherlands;
  4. dInstitute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS October 24, 2017 114 (43) 11464-11469; first published October 9, 2017; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1712211114
Daniel S. Maynard
aDepartment of Ecology & Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637;
bSchool of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06511;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: dmaynard@uchicago.edu
Thomas W. Crowther
cDepartment of Terrestrial Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology, 6708 -PB Wageningen, The Netherlands;
dInstitute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark A. Bradford
bSchool of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06511;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  1. Edited by Simon A. Levin, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, and approved September 12, 2017 (received for review July 8, 2017)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Significance

Diverse communities typically have higher functional potential (e.g., biomass production) because species use different resources and respond to different environmental cues. Yet, in highly competitive communities, individuals often grow less efficiently together due to intense competition for shared resources. Here, we show that the structure of the competitive network (i.e., who beats who) ultimately determines whether an increase in diversity leads to an increase or a decrease in functioning. The diversity–function relationship depended both on whether communities exhibited “rock–paper–scissors” (i.e., intransitive) dynamics, and whether they comprised strong versus weak competitors. These results highlight that knowledge of the competitive network may be integral for predicting when losses in biodiversity will have positive or negative effects on ecosystem function.

Abstract

The structure of the competitive network is an important driver of biodiversity and coexistence in natural communities. In addition to determining which species survive, the nature and intensity of competitive interactions within the network also affect the growth, productivity, and abundances of those individuals that persist. As such, the competitive network structure may likewise play an important role in determining community-level functioning by capturing the net costs of competition. Here, using an experimental system comprising 18 wood decay basidiomycete fungi, we test this possibility by quantifying the links among competitive network structure, species diversity, and community function. We show that species diversity alone has negligible impacts on community functioning, but that diversity interacts with two key properties of the competitive network—competitive intransitivity and average competitive ability—to ultimately shape biomass production, respiration, and carbon use efficiency. Most notably, highly intransitive communities comprising weak competitors exhibited a positive diversity–function relationship, whereas weakly intransitive communities comprising strong competitors exhibited a negative relationship. These findings demonstrate that competitive network structure can be an important determinant of community-level functioning, capturing a gradient from weakly to strongly competitive communities. Our research suggests that the competitive network may therefore act as a unifying link between diversity and function, providing key insight as to how and when losses in biodiversity will impact ecosystem function.

  • competitive intransitivity
  • basidiomycete
  • interference
  • community assembly
  • ecosystem function

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: dmaynard{at}uchicago.edu.
  • Author contributions: D.S.M., T.W.C., and M.A.B. designed research; D.S.M. and T.W.C. performed research; M.A.B. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; D.S.M. analyzed data; and D.S.M. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1712211114/-/DCSupplemental.

Published under the PNAS license.

View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Competitive network determines the direction of the diversity–function relationship
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Competitive network and diversity–function
Daniel S. Maynard, Thomas W. Crowther, Mark A. Bradford
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Oct 2017, 114 (43) 11464-11469; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1712211114

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Competitive network and diversity–function
Daniel S. Maynard, Thomas W. Crowther, Mark A. Bradford
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Oct 2017, 114 (43) 11464-11469; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1712211114
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Article Classifications

  • Biological Sciences
  • Ecology
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 114 (43)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • SI Materials and Methods
    • Results and Discussion
    • SI Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Water from a faucet fills a glass.
News Feature: How “forever chemicals” might impair the immune system
Researchers are exploring whether these ubiquitous fluorinated molecules might worsen infections or hamper vaccine effectiveness.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Dmitry Naumov.
Reflection of clouds in the still waters of Mono Lake in California.
Inner Workings: Making headway with the mysteries of life’s origins
Recent experiments and simulations are starting to answer some fundamental questions about how life came to be.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Radoslaw Lecyk.
Cave in coastal Kenya with tree growing in the middle.
Journal Club: Small, sharp blades mark shift from Middle to Later Stone Age in coastal Kenya
Archaeologists have long tried to define the transition between the two time periods.
Image credit: Ceri Shipton.
Illustration of groups of people chatting
Exploring the length of human conversations
Adam Mastroianni and Daniel Gilbert explore why conversations almost never end when people want them to.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Panda bear hanging in a tree
How horse manure helps giant pandas tolerate cold
A study finds that giant pandas roll in horse manure to increase their cold tolerance.
Image credit: Fuwen Wei.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Cozzarelli Prize
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490