Competitive network determines the direction of the diversity–function relationship
- aDepartment of Ecology & Evolution, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637;
- bSchool of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06511;
- cDepartment of Terrestrial Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology, 6708 -PB Wageningen, The Netherlands;
- dInstitute of Integrative Biology, ETH Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland
See allHide authors and affiliations
Edited by Simon A. Levin, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, and approved September 12, 2017 (received for review July 8, 2017)

Significance
Diverse communities typically have higher functional potential (e.g., biomass production) because species use different resources and respond to different environmental cues. Yet, in highly competitive communities, individuals often grow less efficiently together due to intense competition for shared resources. Here, we show that the structure of the competitive network (i.e., who beats who) ultimately determines whether an increase in diversity leads to an increase or a decrease in functioning. The diversity–function relationship depended both on whether communities exhibited “rock–paper–scissors” (i.e., intransitive) dynamics, and whether they comprised strong versus weak competitors. These results highlight that knowledge of the competitive network may be integral for predicting when losses in biodiversity will have positive or negative effects on ecosystem function.
Abstract
The structure of the competitive network is an important driver of biodiversity and coexistence in natural communities. In addition to determining which species survive, the nature and intensity of competitive interactions within the network also affect the growth, productivity, and abundances of those individuals that persist. As such, the competitive network structure may likewise play an important role in determining community-level functioning by capturing the net costs of competition. Here, using an experimental system comprising 18 wood decay basidiomycete fungi, we test this possibility by quantifying the links among competitive network structure, species diversity, and community function. We show that species diversity alone has negligible impacts on community functioning, but that diversity interacts with two key properties of the competitive network—competitive intransitivity and average competitive ability—to ultimately shape biomass production, respiration, and carbon use efficiency. Most notably, highly intransitive communities comprising weak competitors exhibited a positive diversity–function relationship, whereas weakly intransitive communities comprising strong competitors exhibited a negative relationship. These findings demonstrate that competitive network structure can be an important determinant of community-level functioning, capturing a gradient from weakly to strongly competitive communities. Our research suggests that the competitive network may therefore act as a unifying link between diversity and function, providing key insight as to how and when losses in biodiversity will impact ecosystem function.
Footnotes
- ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: dmaynard{at}uchicago.edu.
Author contributions: D.S.M., T.W.C., and M.A.B. designed research; D.S.M. and T.W.C. performed research; M.A.B. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; D.S.M. analyzed data; and D.S.M. wrote the paper.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1712211114/-/DCSupplemental.
Published under the PNAS license.
Citation Manager Formats
Article Classifications
- Biological Sciences
- Ecology