Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
Research Article

Favorable outcome of experimental islet xenotransplantation without immunosuppression in a nonhuman primate model of diabetes

Barbara Ludwig, Stefan Ludwig, Anja Steffen, Yvonne Knauf, Baruch Zimerman, Sophie Heinke, Susann Lehmann, Undine Schubert, Janine Schmid, Martina Bleyer, Uwe Schönmann, Clark K. Colton, Ezio Bonifacio, Michele Solimena, Andreas Reichel, Andrew V. Schally, Avi Rotem, Uriel Barkai, Helena Grinberg-Rashi, Franz-Josef Kaup, Yuval Avni, Peter Jones, and Stefan R. Bornstein
  1. aDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden D-01307, Germany;
  2. bPaul Langerhans Institute Dresden of the Helmholtz Center Munich at The University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus and Faculty of Medicine of the TU Dresden, Dresden D-01307, Germany;
  3. cGerman Center for Diabetes Research (DZD e.V.), D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany;
  4. dDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden D-01307, Germany;
  5. ePathology Unit, German Primate Center, Leibniz-Institute for Primate Research, Göttingen D-37077, Germany;
  6. fBeta-O2 Technologies, Petach-Tikva 49511, Israel;
  7. gDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden D-01307, Germany;
  8. hDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139;
  9. iDFG-Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden D-01307, Germany;
  10. jMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden D-01307, Germany;
  11. kDepartment of Pathology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136;
  12. lDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136;
  13. mDepartment of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136;
  14. nVeterans Affairs Medical Center and South Florida Veterans Affairs Foundation for Research and Education, Miami, FL 33125;
  15. oSylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136;
  16. pInterdisciplinary Stem Cell Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136;
  17. qDivision of Diabetes & Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King’s College London, London SE1 1UL, United Kingdom

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS October 31, 2017 114 (44) 11745-11750; first published October 16, 2017; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708420114
Barbara Ludwig
aDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden D-01307, Germany;
bPaul Langerhans Institute Dresden of the Helmholtz Center Munich at The University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus and Faculty of Medicine of the TU Dresden, Dresden D-01307, Germany;
cGerman Center for Diabetes Research (DZD e.V.), D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Barbara.Ludwig@uniklinikum-dresden.de andrew.schally@va.gov
Stefan Ludwig
dDepartment of Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden D-01307, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anja Steffen
aDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden D-01307, Germany;
bPaul Langerhans Institute Dresden of the Helmholtz Center Munich at The University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus and Faculty of Medicine of the TU Dresden, Dresden D-01307, Germany;
cGerman Center for Diabetes Research (DZD e.V.), D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yvonne Knauf
ePathology Unit, German Primate Center, Leibniz-Institute for Primate Research, Göttingen D-37077, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Baruch Zimerman
fBeta-O2 Technologies, Petach-Tikva 49511, Israel;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sophie Heinke
gDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden D-01307, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susann Lehmann
aDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden D-01307, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Undine Schubert
aDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden D-01307, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Janine Schmid
aDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden D-01307, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martina Bleyer
ePathology Unit, German Primate Center, Leibniz-Institute for Primate Research, Göttingen D-37077, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Uwe Schönmann
ePathology Unit, German Primate Center, Leibniz-Institute for Primate Research, Göttingen D-37077, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Clark K. Colton
hDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ezio Bonifacio
iDFG-Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden D-01307, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michele Solimena
bPaul Langerhans Institute Dresden of the Helmholtz Center Munich at The University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus and Faculty of Medicine of the TU Dresden, Dresden D-01307, Germany;
cGerman Center for Diabetes Research (DZD e.V.), D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany;
jMax Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden D-01307, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andreas Reichel
aDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden D-01307, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew V. Schally
kDepartment of Pathology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136;
lDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136;
mDepartment of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136;
nVeterans Affairs Medical Center and South Florida Veterans Affairs Foundation for Research and Education, Miami, FL 33125;
oSylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136;
pInterdisciplinary Stem Cell Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Barbara.Ludwig@uniklinikum-dresden.de andrew.schally@va.gov
Avi Rotem
fBeta-O2 Technologies, Petach-Tikva 49511, Israel;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Uriel Barkai
fBeta-O2 Technologies, Petach-Tikva 49511, Israel;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Helena Grinberg-Rashi
fBeta-O2 Technologies, Petach-Tikva 49511, Israel;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Franz-Josef Kaup
ePathology Unit, German Primate Center, Leibniz-Institute for Primate Research, Göttingen D-37077, Germany;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yuval Avni
fBeta-O2 Technologies, Petach-Tikva 49511, Israel;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Jones
qDivision of Diabetes & Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King’s College London, London SE1 1UL, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stefan R. Bornstein
aDepartment of Medicine III, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden D-01307, Germany;
bPaul Langerhans Institute Dresden of the Helmholtz Center Munich at The University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus and Faculty of Medicine of the TU Dresden, Dresden D-01307, Germany;
cGerman Center for Diabetes Research (DZD e.V.), D-85764 Neuherberg, Germany;
qDivision of Diabetes & Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King’s College London, London SE1 1UL, United Kingdom
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  1. Contributed by Andrew V. Schally, September 11, 2017 (sent for review May 26, 2017; reviewed by Eelco J. P. de Koning and Roger Lehmann)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Significance

Diabetes mellitus type 1 is an autoimmune disease that results in irreversible destruction of insulin-producing beta cells. Substantial advances have been made in beta cell replacement therapies during the last decades. However, lack of eligible donor organs and the need for chronic immunosuppression to prevent rejection critically limit widespread application of these strategies. In this manuscript, we present an experimental study using a bioartificial pancreas device for the transplantation of xenogeneic islet without affecting the immune system in nonhuman primates. We could demonstrate stable graft function and adequate glucose-regulated insulin secretion without the need for immunosuppressive medication. This strategy opens up new avenues for more widespread and safe application of various cell-based therapies.

Abstract

Transplantation of pancreatic islets for treating type 1 diabetes is restricted to patients with critical metabolic lability resulting from the need for immunosuppression and the shortage of donor organs. To overcome these barriers, we developed a strategy to macroencapsulate islets from different sources that allow their survival and function without immunosuppression. Here we report successful and safe transplantation of porcine islets with a bioartificial pancreas device in diabetic primates without any immune suppression. This strategy should lead to pioneering clinical trials with xenotransplantation for treatment of diabetes and, thereby, represents a previously unidentified approach to efficient cell replacement for a broad spectrum of endocrine disorders and other organ dysfunctions.

  • diabetes
  • porcine islets
  • beta-cell replacement
  • immune barrier

Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disease with increasing incidence during the last decades (1). Despite major advances in the treatment of T1D, it is still associated with substantial morbidities and a significant reduction in life expectancy (2). The transplantation of isolated pancreatic islets is an established therapy for a subset of patients with T1D that can effectively restore normoglycemia, prevent hypoglycemia, and stabilize the long-term complications of T1D (3, 4). However, several problems prohibit this therapy from becoming more widespread. First, there is a lack of suitable human donor organs. Second, human islet transplantation currently requires lifelong immunosuppression, and third, the long-term effects of the graft are unsatisfactory because of immunological and inflammatory reactions, which are also associated with a suboptimal microenvironment of the islet transplant (5).

To overcome these limitations, strategies for physical barriers that protect transplanted cells from immune attacks have been investigated (5⇓–7). If successful, this would create a customized microenvironment to facilitate survival and function of grafts and allow a safe use of alternative cell sources such as xenogeneic and stem cell-derived insulin-producing cells (5, 6, 8, 9).

We have previously reported a strategy for macroencapsulation of islets that provides sufficient immune isolation and allows endogenous regulation of insulin secretion (Fig. 1). This BetaO2 bioartificial pancreas device (10) consists of two islet compartments and an oxygen reservoir that can be refilled through port connections that maintain physiological oxygen pressure without direct contact with the bloodstream. The outside of the chamber is covered with porous membranes of hydrophilized polytetrafluoroethylene that are impregnated with high mannuronic acid alginate to prevent immunologic communication between the recipient and the graft tissue (Fig. 1). In previous studies, this concept was successfully tested in models of rat and pig xeno- and allotransplantation (10⇓⇓–13). These initial studies established islet macroencapsulation as a feasible approach to transplantation. We have also performed a pioneer application in a patient with T1D by transplanting encapsulated allogeneic islets isolated from a human donor and followed the patient over a period of 10 mo without immunosuppression. Viable transplanted islets were successfully retrieved after 10 mo, and we found no evidence of an immune response against the transplanted islets (14). The availability of human islets is, however, very limited. Therefore, we progressed to an alternative cell source of porcine islets, which is an intriguing option for various replacement therapies in view of the consistent lack of sufficient human organs for the increasing number of patients on the waiting lists. In particular, given the recent prospects of devices for safe encapsulation as presented here, xenotransplantation offers a potentially unlimited source of material for islet grafts (15). Although stem cell–derived therapies may offer great long-term promise for diabetes therapy, xenotransplants may represent an option with potentially shorter horizons to the clinic (16).

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Schematic view of the chamber system for islet macroencapsulation and encapsulated porcine islets. (A) The system is built from two islet compartments containing the islets immobilized in alginate and an oxygen module in center, connected to access ports for exogenous oxygen refilling. These ports allow direct injection of oxygen-enriched gas mixture (95% oxygen at 1.4 ATM; 1,011 Torr) into the central cavity. Oxygen is diffusing via the gas permeable membranes into two external chambers and via additional two gas permeable membranes into the cell chambers, where it is dissolved and consumed by the islets. According to mathematical models, refueling of oxygen every 24 h ensures minimal pO2 within the islet module at above critical value of 60 Torr at all islets, (29). The plastic housing of the chamber is covered by porous membranes of hydrophylized polytetrafluoroethylene impregnated with alginate. Drawing is not to scale. (B) Microscopic image (brightfield) of porcine islets immobilized in alginate ready for integration into the chamber system.

Results

Nonhuman Primate Model.

The combination of surgical subtotal pancreatectomy plus streptozotocin resulted in reproducibly C-peptide-deficient recipients. Because of the insulin and glucagon deficiency, the glycemic profile was highly unstable, and complex diabetes care as practice in completely insulin-deficient patients with diabetes was necessary to achieve acceptable control of blood glucose (BG). As the result of an extensive training program, to which every recipient animal was exposed before entering the study, glucose monitoring, exogenous insulin treatment, and the daily oxygen refueling of the device were performed without complications. The animals showed adequate recovery from the interventions, food and water intake was quickly normalized, and body weight development was recorded as equivalent to that of healthy controls (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Summary of demographic and metabolic data (n = 3)

Metabolic Follow-Up.

Graft function was evaluated by frequent BG measurements and determination of systemic basal and stimulated C-peptide [i.v. glucose tolerance tests (ivGTT)]. On transplantation, the animals showed a steadily improving glycemic control (Fig. 2 A and B), whereas insulin demand could be decreased by approximately half of pretransplantation needs (pretransplantation: 18.9 ± 1.6 IU/d; day 151–180 posttransplantation: 10.8 ± 2.4 IU/d; Table 1). This marked reduction in insulin use was not at the expense of glycemic control, as indicated by the assessment of serum fructosamine levels, which are reflecting glucose levels during the previous 2–3 wk. At baseline, animals showed mean fructosamine levels of 194 ± 12 µmol/L. The normal range for this species is indicated as 160–230 µmol/L (17). All animals showed an increase in fructosamine levels after diabetes induction (260 ± 31 µmol/L) and a steady decrease after transplantation reaching normal ranges at 12 wk (213 ± 12 µmol/L) and 24 wk (206 ± 8 µmol/L) after transplantation. For the determination of direct graft function, porcine C-peptide was measured during ivGTTs. We observed BG kinetics comparable to healthy control animals and adequate C-peptide secretion on glucose challenge (Fig. 2 C and D). A summary of metabolic characteristics is provided in Table 1.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Efficacy study of macroencapsulated porcine islets transplanted into diabetic nonhuman primates (n = 3). (A) The levels of fasting BG showed persistent stable glycemic control over time, despite a stepwise reduction in daily exogenous insulin dose (B). On explantation, the insulin demand immediately increased to prevent hyperglycemia. Values are shown as mean (solid line) ± SD (dashed line) for all three animals. Total insulin was composed of long-acting insulin (glargine; Lantus, Sanofi-Aventis) and short-acting insulin (glulisine; Apidra, Sanofi-Aventis). All animals were challenged by ivGTT before intervention and 1 wk, 4 wk, 3 mo, and 6 mo after transplantation, as well as after explantation of the islet graft. (C) During glucose challenge, there was adequate BG lowering comparable to healthy control, accompanied by porcine-specific C-peptide secretion (D). (Insets) AUC for BG (mmol × min × L−1) and porcine C-peptide (ng × min × mL−1) during the glucose challenge for each time.

Biocompatibility and Immune Assessment.

On the retrieval at 6 mo, the device was macroscopically intact, the membrane surface was clean and without any adhesions, and the implantation site appeared as a thin fibrous capsule (Fig. 3) that was strongly vascularized, as shown by immunohistochemical analysis for CD31 (Fig. 4 A and B). The extracted alginate-immobilized islet slabs were analyzed immunohistochemically and revealed a well-preserved architecture with regular distribution of cell types, as typical for adult porcine islets (18). The explanted islet grafts showed no morphological difference in comparison with the islets implanted initially (Fig. 4 C and D). The surrounding tissue showed no signs of inflammation, and immunohistochemical staining for immune markers such as CD8, CD3, and CD68 identified only rare, apparently sporadic positive cells (Fig. 4 E, F, and G).

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Implantable device containing porcine islets. (A) Intraoperative situs with the device, embedded in a bluntly dissected pocket between the parietal peritoneum and the fascia of the abdominal muscles and s.c. fixed port connections for oxygen refueling. (B and C) Smooth explantation of device and port system without relevant fibrous adhesions. (D) Retrieved bioartificial pancreas device with intact and clean membrane surfaces.

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Immunohistochemical analysis of islets after explantation and device surrounding tissue. (A and B) Representative images of tissue surrounding the device on the peritoneal site, stained for CD31 to visualize strong vascularization as crucial for exchange of glucose/hormones. (Red) CD31, (blue) DAPI. (C and D) Representative images of porcine islets immobilized in alginate analyzed after explantation of the device at 6 mo. (Green) insulin, (red) Glucagon, (blue) DAPI. The architecture and cell composition of explanted islet grafts were not different to the structure at the time of implantation. Although beta cells are often found as single cells or grouped together to form the core of islets at younger age, the retired breeder animals as used in this study typically show a rather compact structure with beta cells scattered throughout the islet and alpha cells predominantly in the periphery. For analysis of local immune reactions at the transplantation site, the surrounding tissue was stained for CD8+ T-cells (E), CD3+ activated cytotoxic T-cells (F), and CD68+ macrophages (G); (red) respective CD-molecules, (blue) DAPI. Arrows indicate the relevant structures in the respective images (exemplary).

Discussion

This encapsulation strategy was applied by us to a preclinical model of porcine islet xenografts in diabetic nonhuman primates (NHP). We demonstrated a comprehensive safety profile of the xenograft in the BetaO2 bioartificial pancreas device, with no detectable transmission of porcine cytomegalovirus or porcine endogenous retroviruses to the NHP hosts (19) and persistent graft function with regulated insulin secretion without any immunosuppressive therapy. In addition to the indirect clinical benefits such as glycemic stability and prevention of hypoglycemia that have been shown in other approaches (9), the detection of endogenous porcine-specific C-peptide provided a direct proof of graft function. The failure to achieve complete independence to insulin in our system is certainly associated in part with the well-described limitations of the NHP model (20, 21), but is also a result of the intrinsic limitations of any encapsulation system in which nutrient and hormonal passage over the physical barriers are solely dependent on diffusion (22). The lack of insulin independence also prevents checking the safety of the device with regard to delayed insulin response and systemic insulin effect on glucose challenge and consecutive hypoglycemia. However, this potential challenge of any diffusion device has been addressed in previous studies with the BetaO2 device (13). Also, in a single-patient study carried out with encapsulated human islets (14), no episodes of hypoglycemia have been detected even though the patient was temporarily substituted with basal insulin only. Overall, the challenge of insulin secretory kinetics using encapsulation devices is a crucial one, and because of the critical limitations of animal models with respect to the extrapolation of results to the clinical situation, it seems likely a satisfactory answer can only be generated in clinical pilot trials. In summary, this concept of islet macroencapsulation has previously been successfully proven in different transplant models in small and large animals, and now in a xenogeneic NHP model with regard to biocompatibility, safety, efficacy, and sufficient immunoprotection. Ongoing refinements of the device with a particular focus on increasing the transplantable islet mass and optimized, simplified approaches for oxygen supply are targeted on a larger cohort of subjects eligible for this beta cell replacement approach. Furthermore, functional potency of porcine islets can be optimized by pretreatment strategies such as the application of GHRH agonists (23), which we have shown to be highly beneficial for improving graft survival and function (11, 24⇓–26). The coupling of bioactive components to the device membrane surface (e.g., anti-inflammatory, revascularization enhancing substances) might further improve this concept. In conclusion, the described strategy is a major step for a future curative approach to diabetes, supporting further in-depth studies to optimize cell sources and application devices. Importantly, it also presents a previously untried and more efficient strategy of cell replacement for a broad spectrum of endocrine disorders and other organ dysfunctions.

Materials and Methods

All animal studies were approved and in accordance with the strict guidelines established by the University of Dresden Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and the respective authorities.

Donor Animals and Organ Retrieval.

Porcine islets were isolated from Goettingen minipigs (Ellegard). Before organ retrieval, the animals were housed under standard conditions (19–23 °C; 40–70% relative humidity; 12:12 h day:night cycle) and fed twice daily with special minipig pelleted food (Ellegard). Water was provided ad libitum. For this study, female retired breeder minipigs with an average age of 3–4 y and average pregnancies of three to four were used ensuring for reproducible islet yields and quality (27). The procedure of pancreas organ retrieval has been described in detail previously (27). In brief, after premedication, the anesthesia was performed as total i.v. anesthesia. After median laparotomy, the peritoneal layer covering the pancreas was incised and the organ was mobilized from its adjacent tissue, leaving the major pancreas supplying vasculature intact. Organ perfusion was performed systemically through a perfusion catheter inserted in the suprarenal aorta, using cold Custodiol-HTK solution (Köhler Chemie GmbH).

Porcine Islet Isolation and Encapsulation.

Islet isolation was performed by a modified Ricordi method using collagenase NB8 (4 U/g tissue) and neutral protease (0.6 U/g tissue) purchased from SERVA and DNase (100 mg; Roche Diagnostics) for digestion. Purification was performed by discontinuous gradient centrifugation. Isolated islets were cultured in CMRL medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS (Gibco), and l-glutathione 32.5 mM (Sigma-Aldrich). Islet isolation outcome was determined by assessing the number of islet particles and their volume converted into islet equivalents, using standard dithizone staining. The encapsulation procedure was performed 24 h after isolation, according to our established good manufacturing practice (GMP)-like protocols.

Bioartificial Pancreas Device.

The detailed construction of the chamber system used for islet macroencapsulation was previously described (10⇓⇓–13). Briefly, the device is 68 mm in diameter and 18 mm in thickness (Fig. 1), composed of a 600-µm-thick immobilized islets module attached to an oxygen module by a gas-permeable silicon-rubber membrane. The oxygen module is connected to two polyurethane access ports implanted s.c. A gas mixture containing 95% O2 at 1.4 atm and 5% CO2 is refilled daily. The outside of the chamber consists of hydrophilic 0.4 µm porous polytetrafluoroethylene membranes and is impregnated with high mannuronic acid alginate to prevent immunologic communication between the recipient and the graft tissue.

Diabetes Induction in Recipient Animals.

Rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) of ∼10 kg body weight were used for these studies that were performed entirely at the German Primate Center, Göttingen, Germany. Before entering the study, the animals were extensively trained for BG monitoring and the necessary oxygen refueling of the device. For surgical diabetes induction, the animals were fasted overnight with free access to water. After premedication, the anesthesia was performed as total i.v. anesthesia. The abdominal region was cleaned and shaved before disinfection and covered with surgical drapes. After median laparotomy, the pancreas was carefully dissected from the surrounding tissue and liberated. Particular precaution was exercised in the duodenal part of the pancreas, preserving the duodenal vascular arcade and thereby preventing ischemic complications. Therefore, a very small part of pancreatic tissue was left in situ. Furthermore, this strategy of subtotal pancreatectomy allowed for preserving the anatomical drainage of the bile duct. The abdomen and the skin were sutured with absorbable material. Postoperatively, insulin therapy was started by multiple daily injection of insulin (long-acting insulin glargine: Lantus, Sanofi-Aventis; short-acting insulin glulisine: Apidra, Sanofi-Aventis) according to clinical practice. Insulin glargine was given twice daily for ensuring persistent basal insulin levels at a total dose of ∼1 IU/kg body weight (BW). Dose was adjusted to reach fasting BG levels between 4 and 10 mmol/L. Insulin glulisine was administered before feeding and for correcting hyperglycemia according to BG readings (2–4 IU/regular meal; 1 IU for lowering BG by 1 mmol/L; target BG level of 8 mmol/L). One week after pancreatectomy, the animals received a single dose of streptozotocin of 80 mg/kg BW to induce complete insulin deficiency (28), which was proven by negative monkey-specific C-peptide measurement during ivGTT.

Transplantation of Encapsulated Animals.

Diabetic rhesus macaques were then transplanted using ∼20,000 islets/kg BW, encapsulated within the BetaO2 bioartificial pancreas device, and followed for 6 mo (n = 3). After premedication and establishment of anesthesia, a median relaparotomy was performed and the device containing the islet graft was implanted within a bluntly dissected pocket between the parietal peritoneum and the fascia of the abdominal muscles. The port connections for refueling of oxygen were placed and fixed s.c. in the lateral thoracic region (Fig. 3). The entire study was performed without immunosuppression.

Metabolic Monitoring.

For metabolic assessment, BG levels were closely monitored and exogenous insulin treatment adjusted accordingly. Basal and short-acting insulin doses were reduced subtly, ensuring continuous acceptable glycemic control and avoiding induction of hypoglycemia. Concomitantly, serum samples were taken before intervention, at the time of transplantation, 1, 4, 12, and 24 wk after transplantation for determination of fructosamine as marker for glycemic control (cobas 8000, fructosamine immunoassay; Roche Diagnostics). ivGTTs were conducted at regular intervals before intervention, after 1 and 4 wk, 3 mo, and 6 mo after transplantation, as well as after explantation of the islet graft. Samples were taken at 5, 10, 20, 40, 60, and 120 min after glucose challenge and measured for glucose and porcine-specific C-peptide (10-1256-01 porcine C-peptide ELISA immunoassay; Mercodia). The ELISA was performed according to manufacturer’s instructions.

Immunohistochemical Analysis.

After retrieval of the device, islet grafts and the surrounding tissue were fixed overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde and embedded in Tissue-Tek O.C.T (Sakura Finetek). Immunohistochemistry was performed on 6-μm sections using primary antibodies Guinea pig polyclonal anti-insulin antibody (1:100, ab7842; abcam), mouse monoclonal anti-glucagon antibody (1:2,000, G2654; Sigma), rabbit anti-CD3 (1:100, C7930; Sigma), mouse monoclonal anti CD4 antibody (4B12; 1:100, MA5-12259; Thermo Fisher Scientific), rabbit monoclonal anti-CD8(SP16) antibody (1:100, SAB5500074; Sigma), and mouse monoclonal anti CD68 Antibody (KP1; 1:100, MA5-13324; Thermo Fisher Scientific). After blocking unspecific antibody binding sites with background sniper (Biocare medical) for 11 min at room temperature, sections were incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. After washing in PBS with 0.5% Tween, secondary antibodies goat anti-guinea pig Alexa Flour 488 (1:1,000, A11073; Life Technologies), goat anti-rabbit Alexa Flour 568 (1:1,000, A11011; Life Technologies), and goat anti-mouse Alexa Flour 568 (1:1,000, A11031; Life Technologies) were applied for 1 h at room temperature. DAPI (10236276001; Roche) was applied for cell nucleus-specific staining. Immunofluorescence microscopy was performed on Zeiss Axiovert200M with AxioCamMRc5.

Acknowledgments

We thank the German Primate Center for highly professional support of the nonhuman primate studies. This study was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) Grant BR1179 (to B.L.) and Grants CRC/TRR 127 and 205 (to B.L. and S.R.B.), the German Ministry for Education and Research to the German Centre for Diabetes Research (DZD e.V.), and the DFG-Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden, Germany.

Footnotes

  • ↵1B.L. and S. Ludwig contributed equally to this work.

  • ↵2To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: Barbara.Ludwig{at}uniklinikum-dresden.de or andrew.schally{at}va.gov.
  • Author contributions: B.L., S. Ludwig, Y.K., B.Z., U. Schönmann, E.B., A. Reichel, A. Rotem, U.B., F.-J.K., Y.A., and S.R.B. designed research; B.L., S. Ludwig, A.S., Y.K., B.Z., S.H., S. Lehmann, U. Schubert, J.S., M.B., and U. Schönmann performed research; B.L., A.S., C.K.C., E.B., M.S., A. Reichel, A.V.S., A. Rotem, U.B., H.G.-R., Y.A., P.J., and S.R.B. analyzed data; and B.L., S. Ludwig, E.B., A.V.S., U.B., P.J., and S.R.B. wrote the paper.

  • Reviewers: E.J.P.d.K., Leiden University Medical Center; and R.L., Universitätsspital Zürich.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Published under the PNAS license.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Wild S,
    2. Roglic G,
    3. Green A,
    4. Sicree R,
    5. King H
    (2004) Global prevalence of diabetes: Estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 27:1047–1053.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Livingstone SJ, et al., Scottish Diabetes Research Network epidemiology group, Scottish Renal Registry
    (2015) Estimated life expectancy in a Scottish cohort with type 1 diabetes, 2008-2010. JAMA 313:37–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Choudhary P, et al.
    (2015) Evidence-informed clinical practice recommendations for treatment of type 1 diabetes complicated by problematic hypoglycemia. Diabetes Care 38:1016–1029.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Thompson DM, et al.
    (2011) Reduced progression of diabetic microvascular complications with islet cell transplantation compared with intensive medical therapy. Transplantation 91:373–378.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Bartlett ST, et al.
    (2016) Report from IPITA-TTS opinion leaders meeting on the future of β-cell replacement. Transplantation 100(Suppl 2):S1–S44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Ludwig B,
    2. Ludwig S
    (2015) Transplantable bioartificial pancreas devices: Current status and future prospects. Langenbecks Arch Surg 400:531–540.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Markmann JF, et al.
    (2016) Executive summary of IPITA-TTS opinion leaders report on the future of β-cell replacement. Transplantation 100:e25–e31.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Desai T,
    2. Shea LD
    (2017) Advances in islet encapsulation technologies. Nat Rev Drug Discov 16:338–350.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. ↵
    1. Matsumoto S,
    2. Abalovich A,
    3. Wechsler C,
    4. Wynyard S,
    5. Elliott RB
    (2016) Clinical benefit of islet xenotransplantation for the treatment of type 1 diabetes. EBioMedicine 12:255–262.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Barkai U, et al.
    (2013) Enhanced oxygen supply improves islet viability in a new bioartificial pancreas. Cell Transplant 22:1463–1476.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Ludwig B, et al.
    (2012) Improvement of islet function in a bioartificial pancreas by enhanced oxygen supply and growth hormone releasing hormone agonist. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:5022–5027.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Ludwig B, et al.
    (2010) A novel device for islet transplantation providing immune protection and oxygen supply. Horm Metab Res 42:918–922.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Neufeld T, et al.
    (2013) The efficacy of an immunoisolating membrane system for islet xenotransplantation in minipigs. PLoS One 8:e70150.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Ludwig B, et al.
    (2013) Transplantation of human islets without immunosuppression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:19054–19058.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Perkel JM
    (2016) Xenotransplantation makes a comeback. Nat Biotechnol 34:3–4.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    (January 8, 2016) Xenotransplantation 2.0. Nat Biotechnol, 10.1038/nbt.3466.
  17. ↵
    1. Williams-Fritze MJ,
    2. Smith PC,
    3. Zelterman D,
    4. Scholz JA
    (2011) Fructosamine reference ranges in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci 50:462–465.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Cohrs CM, et al.
    (2017) Vessel network architecture of adult human islets promotes distinct cell-cell interactions in situ and is altered after transplantation. Endocrinology 158:1373–1385.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Morozov VA, et al.
    (2016) Islet cell transplantation from Göttingen minipigs to cynomolgus monkeys: Analysis of virus safety. Xenotransplantation 23:320–327.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Graham ML,
    2. Schuurman HJ
    (2015) Validity of animal models of type 1 diabetes, and strategies to enhance their utility in translational research. Eur J Pharmacol 759:221–230.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Graham ML,
    2. Bellin MD,
    3. Papas KK,
    4. Hering BJ,
    5. Schuurman HJ
    (2011) Species incompatibilities in the pig-to-macaque islet xenotransplant model affect transplant outcome: A comparison with allotransplantation. Xenotransplantation 18:328–342.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Colton CK
    (2014) Oxygen supply to encapsulated therapeutic cells. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 67–68:93–110.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Cai R, et al.
    (2014) Synthesis of new potent agonistic analogs of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) and evaluation of their endocrine and cardiac activities. Peptides 52:104–112.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Ludwig B, et al.
    (2010) Agonist of growth hormone-releasing hormone as a potential effector for survival and proliferation of pancreatic islets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:12623–12628.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Schubert U, et al.
    (2013) Transplantation of pancreatic islets to adrenal gland is promoted by agonists of growth-hormone-releasing hormone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:2288–2293.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Zhang X, et al.
    (2015) Beneficial effects of growth hormone-releasing hormone agonists on rat INS-1 cells and on streptozotocin-induced NOD/SCID mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:13651–13656.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Steffen A, et al.
    (2017) Production of high-quality islets from goettingen minipigs: Choice of organ preservation solution, donor pool, and optimal cold ischemia time. Xenotransplantation 24:12284.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Heinke S, et al.
    (2016) Diabetes induction by total pancreatectomy in minipigs with simultaneous splenectomy: A feasible approach for advanced diabetes research. Xenotransplantation 23:405–413.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. Barkai U,
    2. Rotem A,
    3. de Vos P
    (2016) Survival of encapsulated islets: More than a membrane story. World J Transplant 6:69–90.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Favorable outcome of experimental islet xenotransplantation without immunosuppression in a nonhuman primate model of diabetes
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Islet xenotransplantation in diabetic primates
Barbara Ludwig, Stefan Ludwig, Anja Steffen, Yvonne Knauf, Baruch Zimerman, Sophie Heinke, Susann Lehmann, Undine Schubert, Janine Schmid, Martina Bleyer, Uwe Schönmann, Clark K. Colton, Ezio Bonifacio, Michele Solimena, Andreas Reichel, Andrew V. Schally, Avi Rotem, Uriel Barkai, Helena Grinberg-Rashi, Franz-Josef Kaup, Yuval Avni, Peter Jones, Stefan R. Bornstein
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Oct 2017, 114 (44) 11745-11750; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1708420114

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Islet xenotransplantation in diabetic primates
Barbara Ludwig, Stefan Ludwig, Anja Steffen, Yvonne Knauf, Baruch Zimerman, Sophie Heinke, Susann Lehmann, Undine Schubert, Janine Schmid, Martina Bleyer, Uwe Schönmann, Clark K. Colton, Ezio Bonifacio, Michele Solimena, Andreas Reichel, Andrew V. Schally, Avi Rotem, Uriel Barkai, Helena Grinberg-Rashi, Franz-Josef Kaup, Yuval Avni, Peter Jones, Stefan R. Bornstein
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Oct 2017, 114 (44) 11745-11750; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1708420114
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Article Classifications

  • Biological Sciences
  • Medical Sciences
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 114 (44)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Surgeons hands during surgery
Inner Workings: Advances in infectious disease treatment promise to expand the pool of donor organs
Despite myriad challenges, clinicians see room for progress.
Image credit: Shutterstock/David Tadevosian.
Setting sun over a sun-baked dirt landscape
Core Concept: Popular integrated assessment climate policy models have key caveats
Better explicating the strengths and shortcomings of these models will help refine projections and improve transparency in the years ahead.
Image credit: Witsawat.S.
Double helix
Journal Club: Noncoding DNA shown to underlie function, cause limb malformations
Using CRISPR, researchers showed that a region some used to label “junk DNA” has a major role in a rare genetic disorder.
Image credit: Nathan Devery.
Steamboat Geyser eruption.
Eruption of Steamboat Geyser
Mara Reed and Michael Manga explore why Yellowstone's Steamboat Geyser resumed erupting in 2018.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Birds nestling on tree branches
Parent–offspring conflict in songbird fledging
Some songbird parents might improve their own fitness by manipulating their offspring into leaving the nest early, at the cost of fledgling survival, a study finds.
Image credit: Gil Eckrich (photographer).

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490