Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
Research Article

Fluid-driven origami-inspired artificial muscles

Shuguang Li, Daniel M. Vogt, Daniela Rus, and Robert J. Wood
  1. aJohn A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138;
  2. bThe Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138;
  3. cComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS December 12, 2017 114 (50) 13132-13137; first published November 27, 2017; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1713450114
Shuguang Li
aJohn A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138;
bThe Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138;
cComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: lisg@seas.harvard.edu rjwood@seas.harvard.edu
Daniel M. Vogt
aJohn A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138;
bThe Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniela Rus
cComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert J. Wood
aJohn A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138;
bThe Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: lisg@seas.harvard.edu rjwood@seas.harvard.edu
  1. Edited by Joseph M. DeSimone, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Carbon, Chapel Hill, NC, and approved October 17, 2017 (received for review July 28, 2017)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading
  1. Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Design, fabrication, and resulting multiscale actuators. (A) Miniature linear actuators use polyether ether ketone (PEEK) zigzag origami structures as the skeletons and PVC films as the skins. These biocompatible materials make the actuators suitable for medical and wearable applications. (B) A large-scale high-power actuator is assembled using a zigzag skeleton composed of nylon plates (fold width = 10 cm). The skin is made of thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU)-coated nylon fabric. A car wheel (diameter ≈75 cm, weight ≈22 kg) is lifted to 20 cm within 30 s (Movie S3). (C) Principle of operation of the actuators. Contraction is mainly driven by the tension force of the skin. This force is produced by the pressure difference between the internal and external fluids. Removing fluid from the actuator will temporarily decrease the internal pressure. (D) Fabrication process. A standard actuator can be quickly fabricated in three simple steps: (step 1) skeleton construction using any of a number of techniques, (step 2) skin preparation, and (step 3) fluid-tight sealing.

  2. Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Linear zigzag actuators made of a variety of materials using different fabrication methods. (A) A transparent actuator lifts a clear acrylic plate. Skeleton material (SkeM): 0.254 mm transparent polyester sheet. Fabrication method (FM): laser cutting and manual folding. Skin material (SkiM): 0.102 mm transparent PVC film (Vinyl). Driving fluid (DF): air. (B) A soft linear actuator contracts well even when it is confined into a metal screw nut. SkeM: silicone rubber (M4601). FM: casting. SkiM: 0.24 mm TPU film. DF: air. (C) A vacuum-driven water-soluble actuator is dissolved in hot water (≈ 70 °C) within 5 min. SkeM: polyvinyl alcohol (PVA). FM: 3D printing. SkiM: 0.025 mm PVA film. DF: air. (D) A water pump-driven hydraulic actuator pulls an underwater object for 3.5 cm in 20 s. SkeM: 0.254 mm stainless steel (316). FM: manual forming. SkiM: 0.24 mm TPU film. DF: water.

  3. Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Various basic actuation motions and programmable pseudosequential actuation with multiple degrees of freedom. (A) A 19 cm-long linear zigzag actuator contracts to a compressed structure shorter than 2 cm. The 1D contraction ratio is ∼90%. (B) A 2D origami skeleton using the Miura-ori patterns (area: 11×10 cm2) can contract to a dense bar-shaped structure (area: 9×1 cm2). The 2D area contraction ratio approaches 92%. (C) A 3D “magic-ball” origami using the water-bomb pattern (radius: 3.5 cm) contracts to a compacted cylindrical structure (radius: 0.9 cm; height: 6.5 cm). The 3D volume decreases 91% after this contraction. (D) Bending motion can be achieved by using an asymmetrical beam structure as the skeleton. (E) Using a flasher origami pattern as the skeleton, the actuator rotates more than 90 degrees around its center, and its 2D surface contracts by 54% simultaneously. (F) A complex out-of-plane motion combining torsion and contraction can be programed through a 2D Miura-ori origami pattern with select folds weakened. (G) Three fingers on a robotic hand are actuated at different rates using a single control of the internal air pressure. The skeletal structure of this robotic hand is 3D printed from nylon. Different hinge strengths inside the structural voids are designed for these three fingers, which produce significantly different bending stiffnesses: ks1(red)<ks2(green)<ks3(blue). The bending stiffness of each finger determines its own bending angle at a certain internal pressure level. (H) A bottle of water is gripped, lifted, and twisted by a single-channel vacuum-driven robotic arm. The robotic arm has a modular structure including a cup-shaped gripper and a cylindrical lifter. The gripper uses a polyester magic-ball origami as its skeleton, while a much stiffer compression spring (302 stainless steel) is used as the lifter’s skeleton. When the internal pressure decreases smoothly, the gripping motion will always start first, then the lifting and twisting motions start later as the internal pressure reduces further.

  4. Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Dynamic characterization of a lightweight actuator. (A) A miniature linear zigzag actuator (weight ≈ 2.6 g, volume ≈ 32 cm3) and a common ping-pong ball (weight ≈ 2.5 g, volume ≈ 33.5 cm3). The actuator is primarily made of polyester sheets (skeleton thickness: 0.254 mm; skin thickness: 0.038 mm). (B) It can lift objects several orders of magnitude more massive using a negative internal air pressure (−80 kPa). (C and D) Dynamic performance in load-lifting tests. The actuator can lift a 1 kg load to 5.5 cm within 0.2 s (C). This indicates an average power density of ∼1.04 kW/kg. A peak power density over 2 kW/kg was obtained during the 2 kg load-lifting tests (D).

  • Copyright © 2017 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Madden JD, et al.
    (2004) Artificial muscle technology: Physical principles and naval prospects. IEEE J Oceanic Eng 29:706–728.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. ↵
    1. Haines CS, et al.
    (2016) New twist on artificial muscles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:11709–11716.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Rus D,
    2. Tolley MT
    (2015) Design, fabrication and control of soft robots. Nature 521:467–475.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Lin HT,
    2. Leisk GG,
    3. Trimmer B
    (2011) Goqbot: A caterpillar-inspired soft-bodied rolling robot. Bioinspiration Biomimetics 6:026007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Wang L,
    2. Iida F
    (2015) Deformation in soft-matter robotics: A categorization and quantitative characterization. IEEE Rob Automation Mag 22:125–139.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Kim S,
    2. Laschi C,
    3. Trimmer B
    (2013) Soft robotics: A bioinspired evolution in robotics. Trends Biotechnol 31:287–294.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Suzumori K,
    2. Iikura S,
    3. Tanaka H
    (1992) Applying a flexible microactuator to robotic mechanisms. IEEE Control Syst 12:21–27.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Tsagarakis NG,
    2. Caldwell DG
    (2003) Development and control of a ‘soft-actuated’ exoskeleton for use in physiotherapy and training. Auton Robots 15:21–33.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. ↵
    1. Shin D,
    2. Sardellitti I,
    3. Park YL,
    4. Khatib O,
    5. Cutkosky M
    (2010) Design and control of a bio-inspired human-friendly robot. Int J Rob Res 29:571–584.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Vanderborght B,
    2. Verrelst B,
    3. Van Ham R,
    4. Lefeber D
    (2006) Controlling a bipedal walking robot actuated by pleated pneumatic artificial muscles. Robotica 24:401–410.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. ↵
    1. Jani JM,
    2. Leary M,
    3. Subic A,
    4. Gibson MA
    (2014) A review of shape memory alloy research, applications and opportunities. Mater Des 56:1078–1113.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    1. Haines CS, et al.
    (2014) Artificial muscles from fishing line and sewing thread. Science 343:868–872.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Shahinpoor M,
    2. Bar-Cohen Y,
    3. Simpson J,
    4. Smith J
    (1998) Ionic polymer-metal composites (IPMCS) as biomimetic sensors, actuators and artificial muscles-a review. Smart Mater Structures 7:R15–R30.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Rosset S,
    2. Shea HR
    (2016) Small, fast, and tough: Shrinking down integrated elastomer transducers. Appl Phys Rev 3:031105.
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Anderson IA,
    2. Gisby TA,
    3. McKay TG,
    4. O’Brien BM,
    5. Calius EP
    (2012) Multi-functional dielectric elastomer artificial muscles for soft and smart machines. J Appl Phys 112:041101.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. ↵
    1. Duduta M,
    2. Wood RJ,
    3. Clarke DR
    (2016) Multilayer dielectric elastomers for fast, programmable actuation without prestretch. Adv Mater 28:8058–8063.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Mirfakhrai T,
    2. Madden JD,
    3. Baughman RH
    (2007) Polymer artificial muscles. Mater Today 10:30–38.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. ↵
    1. Pelrine R,
    2. Kornbluh R,
    3. Pei Q,
    4. Joseph J
    (2000) High-speed electrically actuated elastomers with strain greater than 100%. Science 287:836–839.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Shintake J,
    2. Rosset S,
    3. Schubert B,
    4. Floreano D,
    5. Shea H
    (2016) Versatile soft grippers with intrinsic electroadhesion based on multifunctional polymer actuators. Adv Mater 28:231–238.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Palleau E,
    2. Morales D,
    3. Dickey MD,
    4. Velev OD
    (2013) Reversible patterning and actuation of hydrogels by electrically assisted ionoprinting. Nat Commun 4:2257.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Ionov L
    (2014) Hydrogel-based actuators: Possibilities and limitations. Mater Today 17:494–503.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Miriyev A,
    2. Stack K,
    3. Lipson H
    (2017) Soft material for soft actuators. Nat Commun 8:596.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Lipton JI,
    2. Angle S,
    3. Banai RE,
    4. Peretz E,
    5. Lipson H
    (2016) Electrically actuated hydraulic solids. Adv Eng Mater 18:1710–1715.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. Daerden F,
    2. Lefeber D
    (2001) The concept and design of pleated pneumatic artificial muscles. Int J Fluid Power 2:41–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. ↵
    1. Shepherd RF, et al.
    (2011) Multigait soft robot. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:20400–20403.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Connolly F,
    2. Walsh CJ,
    3. Bertoldi K
    (2017) Automatic design of fiber-reinforced soft actuators for trajectory matching. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:51–56.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Wehner M, et al.
    (2016) An integrated design and fabrication strategy for entirely soft, autonomous robots. Nature 536:451–455.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Hines L,
    2. Petersen K,
    3. Lum G,
    4. Sitti M
    (2017) Soft actuators for small-scale robotics. Adv Mater 29:1603483.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. Chou CP,
    2. Hannaford B
    (1996) Measurement and modeling of Mckibben pneumatic artificial muscles. IEEE Trans Rob Automation 12:90–102.
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. Daerden F,
    2. Lefeber D
    (2002) Pneumatic artificial muscles: Actuators for robotics and automation. Eur J Mech Environ Eng 47:11–21.
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. Niiyama R, et al.
    (2015) Pouch motors: Printable soft actuators integrated with computational design. Soft Rob 2:59–70.
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    1. Sanan S,
    2. Lynn PS,
    3. Griffith ST
    (2014) Pneumatic torsional actuators for inflatable robots. J Mech Rob 6:031003.
    OpenUrl
  33. ↵
    1. Veale AJ,
    2. Xie SQ,
    3. Anderson IA
    (2016) Characterizing the Peano fluidic muscle and the effects of its geometry properties on its behavior. Smart Mater Structures 25:065013.
    OpenUrl
  34. ↵
    1. Yang D, et al.
    (2015) Buckling of elastomeric beams enables actuation of soft machines. Adv Mater 27:6323–6327.
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    1. Yang D, et al.
    (2016) Buckling pneumatic linear actuators inspired by muscle. Adv Mater Technol 1:1600055.
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    1. Schenk M,
    2. Guest SD
    (2013) Geometry of Miura-folded metamaterials. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:3276–3281.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Brown E, et al.
    (2010) Universal robotic gripper based on the jamming of granular material. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:18809–18814.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Amend JR,
    2. Brown E,
    3. Rodenberg N,
    4. Jaeger HM,
    5. Lipson H
    (2012) A positive pressure universal gripper based on the jamming of granular material. IEEE Trans Rob 28:341–350.
    OpenUrl
  39. ↵
    1. Steltz E,
    2. Mozeika A,
    3. Rembisz J,
    4. Corson N,
    5. Jaeger HM
    (2010) Jamming as an enabling technology for soft robotics. Proc SPIE 7642:764225.
    OpenUrl
  40. ↵
    1. Hauser S,
    2. Robertson M,
    3. Ijspeert A,
    4. Paik J
    (2017) Jammjoint: A variable stiffness device based on granular jamming for wearable joint support. IEEE Rob Automation Lett 2:849–855.
    OpenUrl
  41. ↵
    1. Kim YJ,
    2. Cheng S,
    3. Kim S,
    4. Iagnemma K
    (2013) A novel layer jamming mechanism with tunable stiffness capability for minimally invasive surgery. IEEE Trans Rob 29:1031–1042.
    OpenUrl
  42. ↵
    1. Kim SW, et al.
    (2014) Flytrap-inspired robot using structurally integrated actuation based on bistability and a developable surface. Bioinspiration Biomimetics 9:036004.
    OpenUrl
  43. ↵
    1. Overvelde JT,
    2. Kloek T,
    3. D’haen JJ,
    4. Bertoldi K
    (2015) Amplifying the response of soft actuators by harnessing snap-through instabilities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:10863–10868.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    1. Overvelde JT, et al.
    (2016) A three-dimensional actuated origami-inspired transformable metamaterial with multiple degrees of freedom. Nat Commun 7:10929.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Vitiello V,
    2. Lee SL,
    3. Cundy TP,
    4. Yang GZ
    (2013) Emerging robotic platforms for minimally invasive surgery. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng 6:111–126.
    OpenUrl
  46. ↵
    1. Nelson BJ,
    2. Kaliakatsos IK,
    3. Abbott JJ
    (2010) Microrobots for minimally invasive medicine. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 12:55–85.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Collins SH,
    2. Wiggin MB,
    3. Sawicki GS
    (2015) Reducing the energy cost of human walking using an unpowered exoskeleton. Nature 522:212–215.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Galloway KC, et al.
    (2016) Soft robotic grippers for biological sampling on deep reefs. Soft Rob 3:23–33.
    OpenUrl
  49. ↵
    1. Chen LH, et al.
    (2017) Soft spherical tensegrity robot design using rod-centered actuation and control. J Mech Rob 9:025001.
    OpenUrl
  50. ↵
    1. Schenk M,
    2. Viquerat AD,
    3. Seffen KA,
    4. Guest SD
    (2014) Review of inflatable booms for deployable space structures: Packing and rigidization. J Spacecr Rockets 51:762–778.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Fluid-driven origami-inspired artificial muscles
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Origami artificial muscles
Shuguang Li, Daniel M. Vogt, Daniela Rus, Robert J. Wood
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Dec 2017, 114 (50) 13132-13137; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1713450114

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Origami artificial muscles
Shuguang Li, Daniel M. Vogt, Daniela Rus, Robert J. Wood
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Dec 2017, 114 (50) 13132-13137; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1713450114
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Article Classifications

  • Physical Sciences
  • Engineering
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 114 (50)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Principle of Operation and Modeling
    • Fabrication Method and Material Choices
    • Programmable Motions
    • Performance Characterization
    • Conclusions
    • Materials and Methods
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Domesticated dog.
Human dispersal and dog domestication
Analyses of ancient dog DNA suggest that dogs were likely domesticated from Eurasian wolves around 23,000 years ago, possibly in Siberia.
Image credit: Pixabay/Chiemsee2016.
An aspen grove.
Pollen seasons and human-caused climate change
Pollen seasons have lengthened by 20 days and pollen concentrations have increased by 21% from 1990 to 2018 in North America, and anthropogenic climate change is a likely factor.
Image credit: William R. L. Anderegg.
Leopards are one of nearly 700 mammal species that may be unable to move into new countries under climate change because of border barriers.
Climate change and conservation across borders
Conservation efforts must be better coordinated across national borders, and the impacts of border barriers on species must be mitigated as the climate changes.
Image credit: Stephen G. Willis.
Man gets swabbed for COVID-19 test.
Opinion: How to ensure regulations don’t stymie COVID-19 point-of-care testing
Vaccination efforts must be coupled with aggressive community-based COVID point-of-care testing so that cases of asymptomatic infection are rapidly identified.
Image credit: Shutterstock/zstock.
Wild staghorn fern.
Journal Club: A popular household fern may be the first known eusocial plant
The ferns appear to demonstrate a division of labor, implying complex social organization.
Image credit: Ian Hutton.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Cozzarelli Prize
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490. PNAS is a partner of CHORUS, COPE, CrossRef, ORCID, and Research4Life.