Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
Research Article

A semisynthetic organism engineered for the stable expansion of the genetic alphabet

Yorke Zhang, Brian M. Lamb, Aaron W. Feldman, Anne Xiaozhou Zhou, Thomas Lavergne, Lingjun Li, and View ORCID ProfileFloyd E. Romesberg
  1. aDepartment of Chemistry, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037;
  2. bDépartement de Chimie Moléculaire, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5250, Université Grenoble Alpes, F-38000 Grenoble, France;
  3. cSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Henan Normal University, Henan 453007, People’s Republic of China

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS February 7, 2017 114 (6) 1317-1322; first published January 23, 2017; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616443114
Yorke Zhang
aDepartment of Chemistry, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian M. Lamb
aDepartment of Chemistry, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Aaron W. Feldman
aDepartment of Chemistry, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anne Xiaozhou Zhou
aDepartment of Chemistry, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Lavergne
bDépartement de Chimie Moléculaire, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 5250, Université Grenoble Alpes, F-38000 Grenoble, France;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lingjun Li
cSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Henan Normal University, Henan 453007, People’s Republic of China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Floyd E. Romesberg
aDepartment of Chemistry, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Floyd E. Romesberg
  • For correspondence: floyd@scripps.edu
  1. Edited by Clyde A. Hutchison III, The J. Craig Venter Institute, San Diego, CA, and approved December 21, 2016 (received for review October 6, 2016)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Significance

The genetic alphabet encodes all biological information, but it is limited to four letters that form two base pairs. To expand the alphabet, we developed synthetic nucleotides that pair to form an unnatural base pair (UBP), and used it as the basis of a semisynthetic organism (SSO) that stores increased information. However, the SSO grew poorly and lost the UBP under a variety of standard growth conditions. Here, using chemical and genetic approaches, we report the optimization of the SSO so that it is healthy, more autonomous, and able to store the increased information indefinitely. This SSO constitutes a stable form of semisynthetic life and lays the foundation for efforts to impart life with new forms and functions.

Abstract

All natural organisms store genetic information in a four-letter, two-base-pair genetic alphabet. The expansion of the genetic alphabet with two synthetic unnatural nucleotides that selectively pair to form an unnatural base pair (UBP) would increase the information storage potential of DNA, and semisynthetic organisms (SSOs) that stably harbor this expanded alphabet would thereby have the potential to store and retrieve increased information. Toward this goal, we previously reported that Escherichia coli grown in the presence of the unnatural nucleoside triphosphates dNaMTP and d5SICSTP, and provided with the means to import them via expression of a plasmid-borne nucleoside triphosphate transporter, replicates DNA containing a single dNaM-d5SICS UBP. Although this represented an important proof-of-concept, the nascent SSO grew poorly and, more problematically, required growth under controlled conditions and even then was unable to indefinitely store the unnatural information, which is clearly a prerequisite for true semisynthetic life. Here, to fortify and vivify the nascent SSO, we engineered the transporter, used a more chemically optimized UBP, and harnessed the power of the bacterial immune response by using Cas9 to eliminate DNA that had lost the UBP. The optimized SSO grows robustly, constitutively imports the unnatural triphosphates, and is able to indefinitely retain multiple UBPs in virtually any sequence context. This SSO is thus a form of life that can stably store genetic information using a six-letter, three-base-pair alphabet.

  • unnatural base pair
  • CRISPR
  • Cas9
  • DNA replication
  • nucleotide transporter

The natural genetic alphabet is composed of four letters whose selective pairing to form two base pairs underlies the storage and retrieval of virtually all biological information. This alphabet is essentially conserved throughout nature, and has been since the last common ancestor of all life on Earth. Significant effort has been directed toward the development of an unnatural base pair (UBP), formed between two synthetic nucleotides, that functions alongside its natural counterparts (1⇓–3), which would represent a remarkable integration of a man-made, synthetic component into one of life’s most central processes. Moreover, semisynthetic organisms (SSOs) that stably harbor such a UBP in their DNA could store and potentially retrieve the increased information, and thereby lay the foundation for achieving the central goal of synthetic biology: the creation of new life forms and functions (4).

For over 15 years, we have sought to develop such a UBP (1), and these efforts eventually yielded a family of predominantly hydrophobic UBPs, with that formed between dNaM and d5SICS (dNaM-d5SICS; Fig. 1A) being a particularly promising example (5⇓–7). Despite lacking complementary hydrogen bonding, we demonstrated that the dNaM-d5SICS UBP is well replicated by a variety of DNA polymerases in vitro (7⇓⇓–10), and that this efficient replication is mediated by a unique mechanism that draws upon interbase hydrophobic and packing interactions (11, 12). These efforts then culminated in the first progress toward the creation of an SSO in 2014, when we reported that Escherichia coli grown in the presence of the corresponding unnatural nucleoside triphosphates (dNaMTP and d5SICSTP), and provided with a plasmid-encoded nucleoside triphosphate transporter (NTT2) from Phaeodactylum tricornutum (which we denote as PtNTT2) (13), is able to import the unnatural triphosphates and replicate a single dNaM-d5SICS UBP on a second plasmid (14).

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

UBPs and transporter optimization. (A) Chemical structure of the dNaM-d5SICS and dNaM-dTPT3 UBPs with a natural dC–dG base pair included for comparison. (B) Comparison of fitness and [α-32P]-dATP uptake in DM1 and the various constructed strains: pCDF and inducible PtNTT2(1–575) (gray); pSC and constitutive PtNTT2(66–575) (blue); and chromosomally integrated and constitutive PtNTT2(66–575) (green). The promoters from which PtNTT2 is expressed are indicated by the labels next to their corresponding markers. Open triangles denote corresponding control strains without PtNTT2. The pCDF plasmids are in E. coli C41(DE3); pSC plasmids and integrants are in E. coli BL21(DE3). All PtNTT2 strains are non-codon-optimized for plasmid-based expression and codon-optimized for chromosomal expression unless otherwise indicated; r.d.u. is relative decay units, which corresponds to the total number of radioactive counts per minute normalized to the average OD600 across a 1-h window of uptake, with the uptake in DM1 induced with 1,000 µM IPTG set to 1 (Materials and Methods for additional details). Error bars represent SD of the mean, n = 3 cultures grown and assayed in parallel; the error bars on some data points are smaller than their marker.

Although this first SSO represented an important proof-of-concept, the generality of the expanded genetic alphabet remained unclear, as retention of the UBP was explored at only a single locus and in only a single sequence context. True expansion of the genetic alphabet requires the unrestricted retention of multiple UBPs at any loci and in any sequence context. Moreover, several limitations were already apparent with the nascent SSO (14). First, although expression of the nucleoside triphosphate transporter enabled E. coli to import dNaMTP and d5SICSTP, its expression caused the SSO to grow poorly, with doubling times twice that of the parental strain. Second, the UBP was not well retained during high-density liquid growth or during growth on solid media, presumably due to the secretion of phosphatases that degrade the unnatural triphosphates. Finally, even under optimal conditions, the nascent SSO was unable to retain the UBP with extended growth. Clearly, the ability to robustly grow under the standard repertoire of culture conditions and indefinitely retain the UBP is a prerequisite for true semisynthetic life. Here, we used genetic and chemical approaches to optimize different components of the SSO, ultimately resulting in a simplified and optimized SSO that grows robustly and is capable of the virtually unrestricted storage of increased information.

Results and Discussion

In our previously reported SSO (hereafter referred to as DM1), the transporter was expressed from a T7 promoter on a multicopy plasmid (pCDF-1b) in E. coli C41(DE3), and its toxicity mandated carefully controlled induction (14). In its native algal cell, PtNTT2’s N-terminal signal sequences direct its subcellular localization and are ultimately removed by proteolysis. However, in E. coli, they are likely retained, and could potentially contribute to the observed toxicity. Using the cellular uptake of [α-32P]-dATP as a measure of functional transporter expression and as a proxy for the uptake of the unnatural triphosphates, we found that removal of amino acids 1 to 65 and expression of the resulting N-terminally truncated variant PtNTT2(66-575) in E. coli C41(DE3) resulted in significantly lower toxicity, but also significantly reduced uptake (Fig. S1 A and B), possibly due to reduced expression (15). Expression of PtNTT2(66-575) in E. coli BL21(DE3) resulted in significant levels of [α-32P]-dATP uptake with little increase in toxicity relative to an empty vector control, but the higher level of T7 RNAP in this strain (16) was itself toxic (Fig. S1 A and C).

Fig. S1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. S1.

The dATP uptake and growth of cells expressing PtNTT2 as a function of inducer (IPTG) concentration or promoter strength, strain background, and presence of N-terminal signal sequences. (A) Uptake of [α-32P]-dATP in strains with inducible PtNTT2. Error bars represent SD of the mean, and n = 3 cultures; r.d.u. is relative decay units, which corresponds to the total number of radioactive counts per minute normalized to the average OD600 across a 1-h window of uptake, with the uptake of C41(DE3) pCDF-1b PtNTT2(1-575) (i.e., DM1) induced with 1,000 µM IPTG set to 1. Deletion of the N-terminal signal sequences drastically reduces uptake activity in C41(DE3), but activity can be restored with higher levels of expression in BL21(DE3). (B) Growth curves of C41(DE3) strains. Induction of PtNTT2(1-575) is toxic. (C) Growth curves of BL21(DE3) strains. Induction of T7 RNAP in BL21(DE3) is toxic (see empty vector traces), which masks the effect of deleting the N-terminal signal sequences of PtNTT2 on cell growth. (D) Uptake of [α-32P]-dATP in strains that constitutively express PtNTT2(66-575) from the indicated promoters. (E) Growth curves of plasmid-based and chromosomally integrated transporter strains. All PtNTT2 strains are non-codon-optimized for plasmid-based expression and codon-optimized for chromosomal expression, unless otherwise indicated. Strain YZ4 also contains a chromosomally integrated Cas9 gene.

We next explored constitutive expression of PtNTT2(66-575) from a low-copy plasmid or a chromosomal locus, which we anticipated would not only eliminate the need to use T7 RNAP but would also impart the SSO with greater autonomy (eliminating the need to induce transporter production), and, importantly, would result in more homogeneous transporter expression and triphosphate uptake across a population of cells, which we reasoned might improve UBP retention. We explored expression of PtNTT2(66-575) in E. coli BL21(DE3) with the promoters PlacI, Pbla, and Plac from a pSC plasmid, and with Pbla, Plac, PlacUV5, PH207, Pλ, Ptac, and PN25 from the chromosomal lacZYA locus (Dataset S1). We also explored the use of a codon-optimized variant of the truncated transporter (see Dataset S1). Although increasing expression of PtNTT2(66-575) (as measured by uptake of [α-32P]-dATP) was correlated with increasing doubling time, indicating that expression of PtNTT2(66-575) still exhibited some toxicity (uptake of [α-32P]-dATP is itself not toxic), each strain exhibited an improved ratio of uptake to fitness compared with DM1 (Fig. 1B). Strain YZ3, which expresses the codon-optimized, chromosomally integrated PtNTT2(66-575) from the PlacUV5 promoter, exhibited an optimal compromise of robust growth (<20% increased doubling time relative to the isogenic strain without the transporter), and [α-32P]-dATP uptake, and was thus selected for further characterization.

To determine whether the optimized transporter system of YZ3 facilitates high UBP retention, we constructed three plasmids that position the UBP within the 75-nt TK1 sequence (14) [with a local sequence context of d(A-NaM-T)]. These include two high-copy pUC19-derived plasmids, pUCX1 [referred to in previous work as pINF (14)] and pUCX2, as well as one low-copy pBR322-derived plasmid, pBRX2 (Fig. S2). In addition to allowing us to examine the effect of copy number on UBP retention, these plasmids position the UBP at proximal (pUCX1) and distal (pUCX2 and pBRX2) positions relative to the origin of replication, which we previously speculated might be important (14). Strains YZ3 and DM1 were transformed with pUCX1, pUCX2, or pBRX2 and directly cultured in liquid growth media supplemented with dNaMTP and d5SICSTP [and isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) for DM1 to induce the transporter], and growth and UBP retention were characterized at an OD600 of ∼1 (Fig. 2A and Fig. S3A; see also Materials and Methods). Although DM1 showed variable levels of retention and reduced growth, especially with the high-copy plasmids, YZ3 showed uniformly high levels of UBP retention and robust growth with all three UBP-containing plasmids (Fig. 2B and Fig. S3A).

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

UBP retention assay and the effects of transporter and UBP optimization. (A) Schematic representation of the biotin shift assay used to determine UBP retention. The plasmid DNA to be analyzed is first amplified in a PCR supplemented with the unnatural triphosphates, and the resulting products are then incubated with streptavidin and subjected to PAGE analysis. X = dNaM, or, in the PCR, its biotinylated analog dMMO2biotin. Y = d5SICS in the PCR, whereas Y = dTPT3 or d5SICS in the plasmid DNA, depending on the experimental conditions. Lane 1 is the product from the oligonucleotide analogous to that used to introduce the UBP during plasmid assembly, but with the UBP replaced by a natural base pair (negative control). This band serves as a marker for DNA that has lost the UBP. Lane 2 is the product from the synthetic oligonucleotide containing the UBP that was used for plasmid assembly. The shift of this band serves as a marker for the shift of DNA containing the UBP. Lane 3 is the product from the in vitro-assembled plasmid before SSO transformation (positive control). The unshifted band results from DNA that has lost the UBP during in vitro plasmid assembly. Lane 4 is the product from an in vivo replication experiment. (B) UBP retentions of plasmids pUCX1, pUCX2, and pBRX2 in strains DM1 and YZ3. Error bars represent SD of the mean, n = 4 transformations for pUCX1 and pUCX2, n = 3 for DM1 pBRX2, and n = 5 for YZ3 pBRX2. (C) UBP retentions of pUCX2 variants, wherein the UBP is flanked by all possible combinations of natural nucleotides (NXN, where N = d(G, C, A, or T) and X = dNaM), in strain YZ3 grown in media supplemented with either dNaMTP and d5SICSTP (gray bars) or dNaMTP and dTPT3TP (black bars).

Fig. S2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. S2.

Plasmid maps. Promoters and terminators are denoted by white and gray features, respectively; pMB1* denotes the derivative of the pMB1 origin from pUC19, which contains a mutation that increases its copy number (41). Plasmids that contain a UBP are generally indicated with the TK1 sequence (orange), but, as described in Results and Discussion and indicated above, pUCX2 and pAIO variants with other UBP-containing sequences also position the UBP in the approximate locus shown with TK1 above; sgRNA (N) denotes the guide RNA that recognizes a natural substitution mutation of the UBP, with N being the nucleotide present in the guide RNA; sgRNA (∆) denotes the guide RNA that recognizes a single nucleotide deletion of the UBP; this sgRNA and its associated promoter and terminator (indicated by ‡) are only present in certain experiments. serT and gfp do not have promoters.

Fig. S3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. S3.

Additional characterization of UBP propagation. (A) Growth curves for the experiments shown in Fig. 2B. YZ3 and DM1 (induced with 1 mM IPTG) were transformed with the indicated UBP-containing plasmids, or their corresponding fully natural controls, and grown in media containing dNaMTP and d5SICSTP. Each line represents one transformation and subsequent growth in liquid culture. The x axis represents time spent in liquid culture, excluding the 1 h of recovery following electroporation (Materials and Methods). Growth curves terminate at the OD600 at which cells were collected for plasmid isolation and analysis of UBP retention. Staggering of the curves along the x axis for replicates within a given strain and plasmid combination is likely due to minor variability in transformation frequencies between transformations (and thus differences in the number of cells inoculated into each culture), whereas differences in slope between curves indicate differences in fitness. Growth of YZ3 is comparable between all three UBP-containing plasmids (and between each UBP-containing plasmid and its respective natural control), whereas growth of DM1 is impaired by the UBP-containing plasmids, especially for pUCX1 and pUCX2. (B) Retentions of gfp pUCX2 variants propagated in YZ3 by transformation, plating on solid media, isolation of single colonies, and subsequent inoculation and growth in liquid media, in comparison with retentions from plasmids propagated by transformation and growth of YZ3 in liquid media only. Cells were plated from the same transformations used in the experiments for Fig. 2C. Solid and liquid media both contained dNaMTP and dTPT3TP. Cells were harvested at OD600 of ∼1. Five colonies were inoculated for each of the pUCX2 variants indicated, but some colonies failed to grow (indicated by a blank space in the table). Retentions for samples isolated from transformants grown solely in liquid media were assayed from the same samples shown in Fig. 2C, but were assayed and normalized to an oligonucleotide control in parallel with the plated transformant samples to facilitate comparisons in retention. See Materials and Methods for additional details regarding UBP retention normalization. For samples with near-zero shift, we cannot determine whether the UBP was completely lost in vivo or if the sample came from a colony that was transformed with a fully natural plasmid (some of which arises during plasmid assembly, specifically during the PCR used to generate the UBP-containing insert).

Given that no plasmid locus or copy number biases on UBP retention were observed in YZ3, we chose pUCX2 as a representative UBP-containing plasmid to explore the effect of local sequence context on UBP retention, and we constructed 16 pUCX2 variants in which the UBP was flanked by each possible combination of natural base pairs within a fragment of the GFP gene (see Dataset S1). Under the same growth conditions as above, we observed a wide range of UBP retentions, with some sequence contexts showing complete loss of the UBP (Fig. 2C). However, since the development of DM1 with the dNaM-d5SICS UBP, we have determined that ring contraction and sulfur derivatization of d5SICS, yielding the dNaM-dTPT3 UBP (Fig. 1A), results in more efficient replication in vitro (17). To explore the in vivo use of dNaM-dTPT3, we repeated the experiments with YZ3 and each of the 16 pUCX2 plasmids, but with growth in media supplemented with dNaMTP and dTPT3TP. UBP retentions were clearly higher with dNaM-dTPT3 than with dNaM-d5SICS (Fig. 2C).

Although dNaM-dTPT3 is clearly a more optimal UBP for the SSO than dNaM-d5SICS, its retention is still moderate to poor in some sequence contexts (Fig. 2C). Moreover, several sequences that show good retention in YZ3 cultured in liquid media show poor retention when growth includes culturing on solid media (Fig. S3B). To further increase UBP retention with even these challenging sequences and/or growth conditions, we sought to selectively eliminate plasmids that lose the UBP. In prokaryotes, the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-CRISPR-associated (Cas) system provides adaptive immunity against viruses and foreign plasmids (18⇓–20). In type II CRISPR-Cas systems, such as that from Streptococcus pyogenes (21, 22), the endonuclease Cas9 uses encoded RNAs [or their artificial mimics known as single-guide RNAs (sgRNAs) (23)] to introduce double-strand breaks in cDNA upstream of a 5′-NGG-3′ protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) (24), which then results in DNA degradation by exonucleases (25) (Fig. 3A). In vitro, we found that the presence of a UBP in the target DNA generally reduces Cas9-mediated cleavage relative to sequences that are fully complementary to the provided sgRNA (Fig. S4). We thus hypothesized that, within a cell, Cas9 programmed with sgRNA(s) complementary to natural sequences that arise from UBP loss would enforce retention in a population of plasmids (by eliminating those that lose the UBP), which we refer to as immunity to UBP loss. To test this, we used a p15A plasmid to construct pCas9, which expresses Cas9 via an IPTG-inducible lacO promoter, as well as an 18-nt sgRNA that is complementary to the TK1 sequence containing the most common dNaM-dTPT3 mutation (dT-dA) via the constitutive proK promoter (Figs. S2 and S5A). Initial exploratory experiments were carried out with strain YZ2 (a forerunner of YZ3 with slightly less optimal transporter performance, but which was available before strain YZ3; Fig. 1B and Fig. S1 D and E). Strain YZ2 was transformed with corresponding pairs of pCas9 and pUCX2 plasmids (i.e., the pUCX2 variant with the UBP embedded within the TK1 sequence such that loss of the UBP produces a sequence targeted by the sgRNA encoded on pCas9), grown to an OD600 of ∼4, diluted 250-fold, and regrown to the same OD600. UBP retention in control experiments with a nontarget sgRNA dropped to 17% after the second outgrowth; in contrast, UBP retention in the presence of the correct sgRNA was 70% after the second outgrowth (Fig. 3B). Sequencing revealed that the majority of plasmids lacking a UBP when the correct sgRNA was provided contained a single nucleotide deletion in its place, which was not observed with the nontarget sgRNA (Fig. S5 B and C). With a pCas9 plasmid that expresses two sgRNAs, one targeting the most common substitution mutation and one targeting the single nucleotide deletion mutation (Fig. S5A), and the same growth and regrowth assay, loss of the UBP was undetectable (Fig. 3B).

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

Cas9-based editing system. (A) Model for Cas9-mediated immunity to UBP loss. (B) UBP retention for pUCX2 TK1 is enhanced by targeting Cas9 cleavage to plasmids that have lost the UBP. The bars labeled hEGFP correspond to UBP retention with growth (black) and regrowth (gray) with an sgRNA that has a sequence taken from the hEGFP gene and thus does not target DNA containing the TK1 sequence (negative control). The bars labeled TK1-A or TK1-A/∆ correspond, respectively, to growth and regrowth with an sgRNA that targets the dNaM to dT mutation or two sgRNAs that individually target the dNaM to dT mutation and a single nucleotide deletion of the UBP.

Fig. S4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. S4.

Effect of dNaM-dTPT3 on Cas9-mediated cleavage of DNA in vitro. Cas9-mediated in vitro cleavage was assessed for six DNA substrates, wherein the third nucleotide upstream of the PAM is one of the four natural nucleotides, dTPT3, or dNaM. The four sgRNAs that are complementary to each natural template were prepared by in vitro transcription with T7 RNAP. To account for differences in sgRNA activity and/or minor variations in preparation, a relative percent maximal cleavage for each sgRNA vs. all six DNA substrates is shown in parentheses (SI Materials and Methods). Values represent means ±1 SD (n = 3 technical replicates). In several cases, the presence of an unnatural nucleotide significantly reduced cleavage compared with DNA complementary to the sgRNA. These data suggest that Cas9 programmed with sgRNA(s) complementary to one or more of the natural sequences would preferentially cut DNA that had lost the UBP.

Fig. S5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. S5.

(A) The sgRNA sequences used to enhance retention of the UBP in Fig. 3B (red denotes guide RNA nucleotides mismatched with the DNA target; the position of dTPT3 is denoted by Y and shown in green); hEGFP is a nontarget sgRNA. (B) Sanger sequencing chromatogram illustrating mutation of dNaM to dT in the absence of an sgRNA to target Cas9 nuclease activity. (C) Sanger sequencing chromatogram illustrating that, in the presence of Cas9 and a targeting sgRNA (TK1-A), sequences containing the dNaM to dT mutation are likely depleted by Cas9 cleavage, thus resulting in the accumulation of other mutations that are either not targeted by the TK1-A sgRNA (∆, a single nucleotide deletion of dNaM) or targeted by the TK1-A sgRNA, but less efficiently because of a mismatch between the guide and the mutation sequence (dNaM to dG). UBP-containing species were depleted before sequencing (SI Materials and Methods). The position of the mutation in the chromatograms shown in B and C is indicated by an arrow.

To more broadly explore Cas9-mediated immunity to UBP loss, we examined retention using 16 pUCX2 variants with sequences that flank the UBP with each possible combination of natural base pairs but also vary its position relative to the PAM, and vary which unnatural nucleotide is present in the strand recognized by the sgRNAs (Table S1). We also constructed a corresponding set of 16 pCas9 plasmids that express two sgRNAs, one targeting a substitution mutation and one targeting the single nucleotide deletion mutation, for each pUCX2 variant. Strain YZ2 carrying a pCas9 plasmid was transformed with its corresponding pUCX2 variant and grown in the presence of the unnatural triphosphates and IPTG (to induce Cas9), and UBP retention was assessed after cells reached an OD600 of ∼1. As a control, the 16 pUCX2 plasmids were also propagated in YZ2 carrying a pCas9 plasmid with a nontarget sgRNA. For 4 of the 16 sequences explored, UBP loss was already minimal without immunity (nontarget sgRNA), but was undetectable with expression of the correct sgRNA (Fig. 4A). The remaining sequences showed moderate to no retention without immunity, and significantly higher retention with it, including at positions up to 15 nts from the PAM.

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

Variation in Cas9-mediated immunity with sequence context. (A) UBP retentions of pUCX2 variants in strain YZ2 with a pCas9 plasmid that expresses a nontarget sgRNA (gray) or an on-target sgRNA (black). Error bars represent SD of the mean, and n = 3 transformations for all sequences except on-target CXA and CXG, where n = 5. (B) UBP retentions of pAIO plasmids in strain YZ3 (gray), which does not express Cas9, or in strain YZ4 (black) with expression of Cas9. In A and B, the nucleotides immediately flanking X = dNaM are indicated, as is distance to the PAM. “(N)” denotes the nucleotide N in the sgRNA that targets a substitution mutation of the UBP; all pCas9 and pAIO plasmids also express an sgRNA that targets a single nucleotide deletion of the UBP. Error bars represent SD of the mean, and n ≥ 3 colonies; Table S1 for exact values of n, sequences, and IPTG concentrations used to induced Cas9 in YZ4. Materials and Methods for additional experimental details.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table S1.

Cas9 NXN sequences

To further simplify and streamline the SSO, we next constructed strain YZ4 by integrating an IPTG-inducible Cas9 gene at the arsB locus of the YZ3 chromosome, which allows for the use of a single plasmid that both carries a UBP and expresses the sgRNAs that enforce its retention. Sixteen such “all-in-one” plasmids (pAIO) were constructed by replacing the Cas9 gene in each of the pCas9 variants with a UBP sequence from the corresponding pUCX2 variant (Fig. S2 and Table S1). YZ4 and YZ3 (included as a no-Cas9 control due to leaky expression of Cas9 in YZ4) were transformed with a single pAIO plasmid and cultured on solid growth media supplemented with the unnatural triphosphates and with or without IPTG to induce Cas9. Single colonies were used to inoculate liquid media of the same composition, and UBP retention was assessed after cells reached an OD600 of ∼1 to 2 (Fig. 4B). Despite variable levels of retention in the absence of Cas9 (YZ3), with induction of Cas9 expression in YZ4, loss was minimal to undetectable in 13 of the 16 sequences. Although retention with the three problematic sequences—d(C-NaM-C), d(C-NaM-A), and d(C-NaM-G)—might be optimized, for example, through alterations in Cas9 or sgRNA expression, the undetectable loss of the UBP with the majority of the sequences after a regimen that included growth both on solid and in liquid media, which was not possible with our previous SSO DM1, attests to the vitality of YZ4.

Finally, we constructed a pAIO plasmid, pAIO2X, containing two UBPs: dNaM paired opposite dTPT3 at position 453 of the sense strand of the GFP gene and dTPT3 paired opposite dNaM at position 36 of the sense strand of the SerT tRNA gene, as well as encoding the sgRNAs targeting the most common substitution mutation expected in each sequence (Fig. S2). YZ4 and YZ3 (again used as a control) were transformed with pAIO2X and subjected to the challenging growth regime depicted in Fig. 5, which included extensive high-density growth on solid and in liquid growth media. Plasmids were recovered and analyzed for UBP retention (Fig. S6) when the OD600 reached ∼1 to 2 during each liquid outgrowth. In YZ3, which does not express Cas9, or in the absence of Cas9 induction (no IPTG) in YZ4, UBP retention steadily declined with extended growth (Fig. 5). With induction of immunity (20 or 40 μM IPTG), we observed only a marginal reduction in growth rate (less than 17% increase in doubling time; Fig. S7), and, remarkably, virtually 100% UBP retention (no detectable loss) in both genes.

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

Simultaneous retention of two UBPs during extended growth. Strains YZ3 and YZ4 were transformed with pAIO2X and plated on solid media containing dNaMTP and dTPT3TP, with or without IPTG to induce Cas9. Single colonies were inoculated into liquid media of the same composition, and cultures were grown to an OD600 of ∼2 (point 1). Cultures were subsequently diluted 30,000-fold and regrown to an OD600 of ∼2 (point 2), and this dilution−regrowth process was then repeated two more times (points 3 and 4). As a no-immunity control, strain YZ3 was grown in the absence of IPTG, and two representative cultures are indicated in gray. Strain YZ4 was grown in the presence of varying amounts of IPTG, and averages of cultures are indicated in green (0 µM, n = 5), blue (20 µM, n = 5), and orange (40 µM, n = 4). Retentions of the UBP in gfp and serT are indicated with solid or dotted lines, respectively. After the fourth outgrowth, two of the YZ4 cultures grown with 20 µM IPTG were subcultured on solid media of the same composition. Three randomly selected colonies from each plate (n = 6 total) were inoculated into liquid media of the same composition, and each of the six cultures was grown to an OD600 of ∼1 (point 5), diluted 300,000-fold into media containing 0, 20, and 40 µM IPTG, and regrown to an OD600 of ∼1 (point 6). This dilution−regrowth process was subsequently repeated (point 7). The pAIO2X plasmids were isolated at each of the numbered points and analyzed for UBP retention (Fig. S6). Cell doublings are estimated from OD600 (Materials and Methods) and did not account for growth on solid media, thus making them an underestimate of actual cell doublings. Error bars represent SD of the mean.

Fig. S6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. S6.

Representative biotin shift assay gels for Fig. 5. Each lane (excluding the oligonucleotide controls) corresponds to a pAIO2X plasmid sample isolated from a clonally derived YZ4 culture, grown with the IPTG concentration indicated, after an estimated 108 cell doublings in liquid culture (point 7 of Fig. 5). Each plasmid sample is split and analyzed in parallel biotin shift reactions that assay the UBP content at the gfp and serT loci (red and blue primers, respectively).

Fig. S7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. S7.

Representative growth curves of YZ4 replicating pAIO2X. Growth curves are for the first dilution−regrowth (point 2) in Fig. 5. Curves terminate at the OD600 at which cultures were collected for both plasmid isolation and dilution for the next regrowth. Doubling times are calculated from the timepoints collected between OD600 0.1 and 1.0 for each curve and averaged for each strain and/or IPTG condition.

Conclusion

Since the last common ancestor of all life on Earth, biological information has been stored with the same four-letter, two-base-pair genetic alphabet. By combining chemical optimization with genetic and immunological engineering, we have created an SSO that is more autonomous (it is naturally competent to import the unnatural triphosphates) and which stores increased information with a fidelity approaching that of natural information. However, unlike any natural organism, the SSO includes an inanimate, man-made component: a UBP that allows it to store information with a six-letter, three-base-pair genetic alphabet. With the virtually unrestricted ability to maintain increased information, the optimized SSO now provides a suitable platform for efforts to retrieve the increased information and create organisms with wholly unnatural attributes and traits not found elsewhere in nature.

Materials and Methods

Strains, Plasmids, and Oligonucleotides.

A complete list of strains and plasmids and the sequences of oligonucleotides used in this work can be found in Dataset S2; for information regarding strain construction and plasmid cloning, as well as additional experimental details, SI Materials and Methods. Unless otherwise stated, liquid bacterial cultures were grown in 2×YT (casein peptone 16 g/L, yeast extract 10 g/L, NaCl 5 g/L) supplemented with potassium phosphate (50 mM, pH 7), referred to hereafter as “media,” and incubated at 37 °C in a 48-well flat-bottomed plate (CELLSTAR; Greiner Bio-One) with shaking at 200 rpm. Solid growth media was prepared with 2% (wt/vol) agar. Antibiotics were used, as appropriate, at the following concentrations: carbenicillin, 100 μg/mL; streptomycin, 50 μg/mL; kanamycin, 50 μg/mL; zeocin, 50 μg/mL; and chloramphenicol, 33 μg/mL for plasmids, 5 μg/mL for chromosomal integrants. All selective agents were purchased commercially. Cell growth, indicated as OD600, was measured using a PerkinElmer Envision 2103 Multilabel Reader with a 590/20-nm filter.

Natural oligonucleotides were purchased from IDT with standard purification and desalting. Gene synthesis of the codon-optimized PtNTT2 and GFP gene sequences was performed by GeneArt Gene Synthesis (Thermo Fisher) and GenScript, respectively, and kindly provided by Synthorx. Sequencing was performed by Eton Biosciences or Genewiz. Plasmids were isolated using commercial miniprep kits (QIAprep; Qiagen, or ZR Plasmid Miniprep Classic; Zymo Research).

The [α-32P]-dATP (3,000 Ci/mmol, 10 mCi/mL) was purchased from PerkinElmer. Triphosphates of dNaM, d5SICS, dTPT3, and dMMO2bio were synthesized as described previously (5, 7, 10, 17) or kindly provided by Synthorx. The dNaM-containing TK1 oligonucleotide was described previously (14). All other unnatural oligonucleotides containing dNaM were synthesized by Biosearch Technologies with purification by reverse phase cartridge and kindly provided by Synthorx.

dATP Uptake Assay.

Radioactive uptake assays were conducted as described (26), with the following modifications: C41(DE3) and BL21(DE3) strains carrying plasmid-based transporters and their appropriate empty plasmid controls, as well as BL21(DE3) chromosomal transporter integrants and their appropriate isogenic transporterless control, were grown overnight with appropriate antibiotics (streptomycin for pCDF plasmids and chloramphenicol for pSC plasmids and integrants) in 500 μL of media. Cultures were diluted to an OD600 of 0.02 in 500 μL of fresh media, grown for 2.5 h, induced with IPTG (0 mM to 1 mM, pCDF strains only) or grown (all other strains) for 1 h, and incubated with dATP spiked with [α-32P]-dATP [final concentration = 250 μM (0.5 μCi/mL)] for ∼1 h. This experimental scheme is analogous to the protocol used to prepare cells for transformation with UBP-containing plasmids, with the 1 h of dATP incubation simulating the 1 h of recovery in the presence of unnatural triphosphates following electroporation. A duplicate 48-well plate without [α-32P]-dATP was grown in parallel to monitor growth.

Following incubation with dATP, 200 μL of each culture was collected through a 96-well 0.65-μm glass fiber filter plate (MultiScreen; EMD Millipore) under vacuum and washed with cold potassium phosphate (3 × 200 μL, 50 mM, pH 7) and cold ddH2O (1 × 200 μL). Filters were removed from the plate and exposed overnight to a storage phosphor screen (BAS-IP MS; GE Healthcare Life Sciences), which was subsequently imaged using a flatbed laser scanner (Typhoon 9410; GE Healthcare Life Sciences). The resulting image was quantified by densitometric analysis using Image Studio Lite (LI-COR). Raw image intensities of each sample were normalized to the length of time and average OD600 during dATP incubation (i.e., normalized to an estimate of the area under the growth curve corresponding to the window of uptake), followed by subtracting the normalized signals of the appropriate negative, with no transporter controls.

Doubling times for strains grown in the dATP uptake assay were calculated by doubling time as (t2-t1)/log2(OD600,2/OD600,1), averaging across three ∼30-min time intervals roughly corresponding to 30 min before dATP uptake and 60 min during dATP uptake.

Golden Gate Assembly of UBP-Containing Plasmids.

Plasmids containing UBP(s) were generated by Golden Gate Assembly. Inserts containing the UBP were generated by PCR of chemically synthesized oligonucleotides containing dNaM, using dTPT3TP and dNaMTP, and primers that introduce terminal BsaI recognition sites that, when digested, produce overhangs compatible with an appropriate destination plasmid; see Dataset S2 for a full list of primers, templates, and their corresponding Golden Gate destination plasmids. Template oligonucleotides (0.025 ng per 50 μL reaction) were PCR-amplified using reagent concentrations and equipment as described previously (14), under the following thermocycling conditions (times denoted as mm:ss): [96 °C 1:00 | 20 × (96 °C 0:15 | 60 °C 0:15 | 68 °C 4:00)].

To assemble the UBP-containing plasmids, destination plasmid (200 ng to 400 ng), PCR insert(s) (3:1 insert:plasmid molar ratio), T4 DNA ligase (200 U), BsaI-HF (20 U), and ATP (1 mM) were combined in 1× New England Biolabs (NEB) CutSmart buffer (final volume 30 μL) and thermocycled under the following conditions: [37 °C 20:00 | 40 × (37 °C 5:00 | 16 °C 5:00 | 22 °C 2:30) 37 °C 20:00 | 55 °C 15:00 | 80 °C 30:00]. Following the Golden Gate reaction, T5 exonuclease (10 U) and additional BsaI-HF (20 U) were added, and the reaction was incubated (37 °C, 1 h) to digest unincorporated plasmid and insert fragments.

In Vivo Plasmid Replication Experiments.

Electrocompetent YZ3 cells were prepared by overnight growth in ∼5 mL of media supplemented with chloramphenicol, dilution to OD600 of 0.02 in the same media (variable volumes, ∼10 mL of media per transformation), and growth to OD600 of ∼0.3 to 0.4. Cells were then rapidly chilled in an ice water bath with shaking, pelleted (2,500 × g, 10 min), and washed twice with one culture volume of ice-cold ddH2O. Electrocompetent cells were then resuspended in ice-cold ddH2O (50 μL per transformation), mixed with a Golden Gate assembled plasmid (∼1 μL, ∼1 ng) containing the UBP, and transferred to a prechilled 0.2-cm-gap electroporation cuvette. Cells were electroporated (Gene Pulser II; Bio-Rad) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations (voltage 25 kV, capacitor 2.5 μF, resistor 200 Ω), then immediately diluted with 950 μL of prewarmed media supplemented with chloramphenicol. An aliquot (10 μL to 40 μL) of this dilution was then immediately diluted fivefold with the same prewarmed media, but additionally supplemented with dNaMTP (250 μM) and d5SICSTP (250 μM). The samples were incubated (37 °C, 1 h), and then ∼15% (vol/vol) of the sample was used to inoculate media (final volume 250 μL to 300 μL) supplemented with chloramphenicol, carbenicillin, dNaMTP (250 μM), and d5SICSTP (250 μM). Cells were then monitored for growth, collected at the density (OD600) indicated in Results and Discussion, and subjected to plasmid isolation. Dilutions of the recovery mixture were also spread onto solid media with chloramphenicol and carbenicillin to ascertain transformation efficiencies. Experiments with dNaMTP (150 μM) and dTPT3TP (37.5 μM) were performed analogously.

Experiments with DM1 were performed analogously using media supplemented with streptomycin, with the additional step of inducing transporter expression with IPTG (1 mM, 1 h) before pelleting the cells. All media following electrocompetent cell preparation was also supplemented with streptomycin and IPTG (1 mM) to maintain expression of the transporter.

In Vivo Plasmid Replication Experiments with Cas9 (Liquid Culture Only).

Electrocompetent YZ2 cells were transformed with various pCas9 guide plasmids, and single clones were used to inoculate overnight cultures. Cells were then grown, prepared, and electroporated as described above for YZ3, with the following modifications: All media was additionally supplemented with zeocin (to select for pCas9) and 0.2% glucose, electrocompetent cells were stored in 10% (vol/vol ddH2O) DMSO at −80 °C until use, and recovery and growth media were supplemented with dNaMTP (250 μM) and dTPT3TP (75 μM). Varying concentrations of IPTG (0 μM to 100 μM) were added to the growth media (but not the recovery media) to induce Cas9 expression. The sgRNAs corresponding to the d(AXT) sequence are the nontarget guides for all sequences except for the d(AXT)-containing sequence itself, the nontarget guides for which correspond to the d(GXT) sequence, and all experiments with nontarget sgRNAs were conducted with the addition of IPTG (10 μM) to the growth media. For growth and regrowth experiments, cells were grown to an OD600 of 3.5 to 4.0, then diluted 1:250 and regrown to an OD600 of 3.5 to 4.0, after which plasmids were isolated.

In Vivo Plasmid Replication Experiments with Cas9 (Plating and Liquid Culture).

Electrocompetent YZ4 cells were grown, prepared, and electroporated as described in In Vivo Plasmid Replication Experiments with Cas9 (Liquid Culture Only) for YZ2, with the following modifications: Media for growing cells before electroporation only contained chloramphenicol (i.e., no zeocin), zeocin was used to select for pAIO (i.e., no carbenicillin), and recovery and growth media were supplemented with dNaMTP (150 μM) and dTPT3TP (37.5 μM). Following transformation with pAIO, dilutions of the recovery mixture were spread onto solid media containing chloramphenicol, zeocin, dNaMTP (150 μM), dTPT3TP (37.5 μM), 0.2% glucose, and various concentrations of IPTG (0–50 μM). Following overnight growth (37 °C, ∼14 h), individual colonies were used to inoculate liquid media of the same composition as the solid media. Experiments performed with pAIO2X were conducted as described above for YZ4 without using frozen electrocompetent cells or glucose. The second plating depicted in Fig. 5 was performed by streaking cells from liquid culture onto solid media of the same composition as the liquid media, and growth at 37 °C (∼14 h). Six random colonies were selected to continue propagation in liquid culture.

Cell Doubling Calculation.

Cell doublings for liquid culture growth−dilution−regrowth experiments were calculated by log2 of the dilution factor (30,000 or 300,000) between growths, except for growths inoculated from a plated colony, the cell doublings for which were calculated by averaging, for each individual clone, the time from inoculation to target OD600 (9.4 ± 1.1 h (1 SD) for the first plating inoculation, 10.2 ± 3 h for the second plating inoculation) and dividing these averages by an estimated doubling time of 40 min. Growth times vary for each clone because colonies were isolated when they were barely visible to the naked eye, and thus we did not attempt to control for variability in the number of cells inoculated into the liquid cultures. Note that the reported number of cell doublings is only an estimate of doublings in liquid culture, which underreports the total number of cell doublings, as we did not attempt to estimate the number of cell doublings that occur during each of the growths on solid media.

Biotin Shift Assay.

The retention of the UBP(s) in isolated plasmids was determined as previously described and validated (14), with the following modifications: Plasmid minipreps or Golden Gate assembled plasmids (0.5 μL, 0.5 ng/μL to 5 ng/μL), or dNaM-containing oligonucleotides (0.5 fmol), were PCR-amplified with dNTPs (400 μM), 1× SYBR Green, MgSO4 (2.2 mM), primers (500 nM each), d5SICSTP (65 μM), dMMO2BioTP (65 μM), OneTaq DNA polymerase (0.018 U/μL), and DeepVent DNA polymerase (0.007 U/μL) in 1× OneTaq standard reaction buffer (final volume 15 μL), under the following thermocycling conditions: [20 × (95 °C 0:15 | x°C 0:15 | 68 °C 4:00)]; see Dataset S2 for a list of primers and their corresponding annealing temperatures (x °C) used in this assay. After amplification, 1 μL of each reaction was mixed with streptavidin (2.5 μL, 2 μg/μL; Promega) and briefly incubated at 37 °C. After incubation, samples were mixed with loading buffer and run on a 6% (wt/vol) polyacrylamide (29:1 acrylamide:bis-acrylamide) Tris/borate/EDTA (TBE) gel, at 120 V for ∼30 min. Gels were then stained with 1× SYBR Gold dye (Thermo Fisher) and imaged using a Molecular Imager Gel Doc XR+ (Bio-Rad) equipped with a 520DF30 filter (Bio-Rad).

Calculation of UBP Retention.

UBP retention was assessed by densitometric analysis of the gels (ImageJ or Image Studio Lite; LICOR) from the biotin shift assay and calculation of a percent raw shift, which equals the intensity of the streptavidin-shifted band divided by the sum of the intensities of the shifted and unshifted bands. Fig. 2A for representative gels. Reported UBP retentions are normalized values.

Unless otherwise indicated, for experiments not involving plating on solid media, UBP retention was normalized by dividing the percent raw shift of each propagated plasmid sample by the percent raw shift of the Golden Gate assembled input plasmid. We assume that the starting UBP content of the cellular plasmid population is equivalent to the UBP content of the input plasmid, which is a valid assumption given direct inoculation of the transformation into liquid culture. Thus, in these experiments, normalized UBP retention is a relative value that relates the UBP content of the propagated plasmid population to the UBP content of the starting population, which is not 100%, due to loss during the PCR used to generate the insert for input plasmid assembly (Fig. 2A).

For experiments involving plating on solid media, UBP retention was normalized by dividing the percent raw shift of each propagated plasmid sample by the percent raw shift of the dNaM-containing oligonucleotide template used in the assembly of the input plasmid. Plating enables clonal isolation of UBP-containing plasmids from fully natural plasmids that arose during plasmid construction [some of which may contain sequences that are not recognized by the sgRNA(s) used]. Because there is no PCR-mediated loss of the UBP in the oligonucleotide template, normalization to the oligonucleotide template is a better indicator of absolute UBP retention than normalization to the input plasmid. Under the conditions used in the biotin shift assay, most oligonucleotide templates and sequence contexts give >90% raw shift, with <2% shift for a cognate fully natural template (i.e., UBP misincorporation during the biotin shift assay is negligible).

Plating allows for the differentiation between UBP loss that occurs in vivo from loss that occurs in vitro, with the exception of clonally derived samples that give <2% shift, for which we are unable to differentiate between whether the UBP was completely lost in vivo or if the sample comes from a transformant that originally received a fully natural plasmid. Such samples are excluded from reported average values when other samples from the same transformation give higher shifts.

SI Materials and Methods

General Methods for Strain and Plasmid Construction.

Unless otherwise stated, all molecular biology reagents were obtained from NEB and were used according to the manufacturer’s protocols. PCRs for cloning and strain construction were performed with Q5 DNA polymerase. Thermocycling was performed using a PTC-200 thermocycler (MJ Research), except for the PCRs used to generate UBP-containing Golden Gate inserts and the PCRs used in the biotin shift assay, which were performed with a CFX-Connect Real-Time Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad) to monitor product amplification with SYBR Green (Thermo Fisher). Where necessary, primers were phosphorylated using T4 polynucleotide kinase. Plasmids linearized by PCR were treated with DpnI to remove the plasmid template, and ligations were performed with T4 DNA ligase. PCRs and Golden Gate assembled plasmids were purified by spin column (DNA Clean and Concentrator-5; Zymo Research). DNA fragments isolated by agarose gel electrophoresis were purified using the Zymoclean Gel DNA recovery kit (Zymo Research). Colony PCRs were performed with Taq DNA polymerase. Natural DNA fragments and plasmids were quantified by A260/280 using a NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher) or an Infinite M200 Pro (Tecan). DNA fragments and plasmids that contain UBP(s), which were typically <20 ng/μL, were quantified using the Qubit dsDNA HS Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher). The C41(DE3) E. coli strain (27) was kindly provided by J. P. Audia, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL. The pKIKOarsBKm was a gift from Lars Nielsen and Claudia Vickers (Addgene plasmid #46766). The pRS426 was kindly provided by Richard Kolodner, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA.

Construction of PtNTT2 Plasmids.

Construction of pCDF-1b-PtNTT2 was described previously (14). To create pCDF-1b-PtNTT2(66-575), phosphorylated primers YZ552 and pCDF-1b-fwd were used to linearize pCDF-1b-PtNTT2 by PCR, and the resulting product was intramolecularly ligated. Plasmids from single clones were isolated and confirmed by sequencing the PtNTT2 gene using primers T7 seq and T7 term seq.

To create plasmids pSC-P(lacI, bla, lac, lacUV5)PtNTT2(66-575)-T0, phosphorylated primers YZ581 and YZ576 were used to amplify the PtNTT2(66-575) gene, and its corresponding ribosomal binding sequence and terminator, from a version of pCDF-1b-PtNTT2(66-575) that replaces the T7 terminator with a λ T0 terminator. This insert was ligated into plasmid pHSG576 (28) linearized with primers DM002 and YZ580. A single clone of the resulting plasmid pSC-PtNTT2(66-575)-T0 was verified by sequencing the PtNTT2 gene using primers DM052 and YZ50. The pSC-PtNTT2(66-575)-T0 was then linearized with primers YZ580 and YZ581, and ligated to a phosphorylated primer duplex corresponding to the PlacI, Pbla, Plac, or PlacUV5 promoter (YZ584/YZ585, YZ582/YZ583, YZ599/YZ600, and YZ595/YZ596, respectively) (29) to yield plasmids pSC-P(lacI, bla, lac, lacUV5)PtNTT2(66-575)-T0. Correct promoter orientation and promoter gene sequences were again confirmed by sequencing using primers DM052 and YZ50. The pSC-PblaPtNTT2(66-575 co)-T0 was generated analogously to pSC-PblaPtNTT2(66-575)-T0 by using a λ T0 terminator version of pCDF-1b-PtNTT2(66-575) containing a codon-optimized PtNTT2 sequence (see Dataset S1).

Construction of PtNTT2 and Cas9 Strains.

The PtNTT2(66-575) expression cassette and its chloramphenicol resistance marker CmR in the pSC plasmids is ∼2.8 kb, a size that is prohibitive for chromosomal integration with the small (∼50 bp) stretches of homology that can be introduced via primers during PCR, as is traditionally done in recombineering (30, 31). Thus, we used cloning by homologous recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to construct a series of integration template plasmids with the PtNTT2(66-575) expression cassette and CmR flanked by ∼1 kb of sequence 5′ to lacZ and ∼1 kb of sequence 3′ to 246 bp downstream of the lacA start codon. The lacZYA locus was chosen so that integration of the transporter would also knock out the lactose permease lacY, thus creating a BL21(DE3) strain that allows for uniform cellular entry of IPTG, and thereby homogenous, finely titratable induction of promoters containing lac operators (32).

To create the integration template plasmids, pRS426 (33) was digested with PvuI-HF, and the resulting 3,810-bp plasmid fragment was isolated by agarose gel electrophoresis and purification. This fragment was then gap-repaired in the S. cerevisiae strain BY4741 via lithium acetate-mediated chemical transformation (34) of the plasmid fragment and PCR products of the following primer/primer/template combinations: YZ7/YZ12/pBR322, YZ613/YZ580/E. coli genomic DNA, YZ614/615/E. coli genomic DNA, and DM052/YZ612/pSC-PlacUV5(66-575)-T0. The resulting plasmid, 426.lacZYA::PlacUV5PtNTT2(66-575)-T0 CmR, was isolated (Zymoprep Yeast Plasmid Miniprep; Zymo Research), digested with PvuI-HF and XbaI (to reduce background during integration, because the pRS426 shuttle plasmid also contains an E. coli pMB1 origin), and used as the template to generate a linear integration fragment via PCR with primers YZ616 and YZ617. Integration of this fragment into BL21(DE3) to generate strain YZ2 was performed using pKD46 as described previously (35). Integrants were confirmed by colony PCR of the 5′ and 3′ junctions using primers YZ618 and YZ587 (1,601-bp product) and YZ69 and YZ619 (1,402-bp product), respectively, detection of lacZ deletion via growth on plates containing X-gal (80 μg/mL) and IPTG (100 μM), and PCR and sequencing of the transporter with primers DM053 and YZ50.

Plasmid 426.lacZYA::CmR was generated from the linearization of 426.lacZYA::PlacUV5PtNTT2(66-575)-T0 CmR using phosphorylated primers YZ580 and pCDF-1b-rev, and subsequent intramolecular ligation. The 426.lacZYA::CmR was then integrated into BL21(DE3) to create an isogenic, transporter-less control strain for dATP uptake assays.

To create plasmids 426.lacZYA::P(bla, lac, lacUV5)PtNTT2(66-575 co)-T0 CmR, plasmid 426.lacZYA::PtNTT2(66-575)-T0 CmR [a promoterless plasmid generated analogously to 426.lacZYA::PlacUV5PtNTT2(66-575)-T0 CmR using pSC-PtNTT2(66-575)-T0], referred to hereafter as 426.trunc, was digested with PvuI-HF and AvrII, and the resulting 5,969-bp plasmid fragment was isolated by agarose gel electrophoresis and purification, and gap-repaired using PCR products of the following primer/primer/template combinations: 1, YZ12/YZ580/426.trunc; 2, DM053/YZ610/pSC-P(bla, lac, lacUV5)PtNTT2(66-575)-T0; and 3, YZ581/YZ50/pSC-PblaPtNTT2(66-575 co)-T0. Plasmids 426.lacZYA::P(tac, N25, λ, H207)PtNTT2(66-575 co)-T0 CmR were generated analogously, except fragments 2 were replaced with fragments corresponding to the promoters Ptac, PN25, Pλ and PH207, which were generated by annealing and extension of primer pairs YZ703/YZ704, YZ707/YZ708, YZ709/YZ710, and YZ711/YZ712, respectively, with Klenow fragment. Plasmids 426.lacZYA::P(bla, lac, lacUV5, tac, N25, λ, H207)PtNTT2(66-575 co)-T0 CmR were then used to integrate the transporter into BL21(DE3) using primers YZ616 and YZ617, and recombineering, as described above. Strain YZ3 denotes BL21(DE3) integrated with lacZYA::PlacUV5PtNTT2(66-575 co)-T0 CmR.

To create strain YZ4, the 4,362-bp fragment of SpeI- and AvrII-digested pCas9-Multi was ligated into SpeI-digested pKIKOarsBKm (30) and the resulting plasmid, pKIKOarsB::PlacO-Cas9-TrrnB KmR, was used as the template to generate a linear integration fragment via PCR with primers YZ720 and YZ721. The fragment was then integrated into BL21(DE3) as described above, and confirmed by colony PCR with primers YZ720 and YZ721 and sequencing of the product with primers TG1–TG6. PlacUV5PtNTT2(66-575 co)-T0 CmR was subsequently integrated into this strain, as described above, to generate strain YZ4.

Construction of Golden Gate Destination Plasmids for pUCX1, pUCX2, and pBRX2.

Although we previously cloned the UBP into plasmids via circular polymerase extension cloning (CPEC) (14, 36), the method results in a doubly nicked plasmid that cannot be treated with T5 exonuclease to degrade unincorporated linear plasmid and inserts, and thus makes it difficult to accurately quantify the yield of the cloning reaction and control the amount of input plasmid used to transform cells during an in vivo replication experiment. Furthermore, the unincorporated linear plasmid and inserts of a CPEC reaction can also template PCR reactions with the primers used in the biotin shift assay, and thus biotin shift assays on CPEC products do not truly reflect the UBP content of the plasmids that are actually transformed into cells. To circumvent these complications, the UBP was incorporated into plasmids using Golden Gate Assembly (37).

To create pUCX1 GG and pUCX2 GG, the Golden Gate destination plasmids for pUCX1 and pUCX2, respectively, pUC19 was linearized with phosphorylated primers pUC19-lin-fwd and pUC19-lin-rev, and the resulting product was intramolecularly ligated to delete the natural 75-nt TK1 sequence. The resulting plasmid was then linearized with phosphorylated primers YZ51 and YZ52, and the resulting product was intramolecularly ligated to mutate the BsaI recognition site within the ampicillin resistance marker AmpR. This plasmid was then linearized with primers pUC19-lin-fwd and pUC19-lin-rev (for pUCX1), or primers YZ95 and YZ96 (for pUCX2), and ligated to an insert generated from PCR with phosphorylated primers YZ93 and YZ94 and template pCas9-Multi, to introduce two BsaI recognition sites (for cloning by Golden Gate Assembly) and a zeocin resistance marker (a stuffer cassette used to differentiate between plasmids with or without an insert) into pUC19.

To create pBRX2 GG, the Golden Gate destination plasmid for pBRX2, the 2,934-bp fragment of AvaI- and EcoRI-HF-digested pBR322 was end-filled with Klenow fragment and intramolecularly ligated to delete the tetracycline resistance cassette. The BsaI recognition site within AmpR was mutated as described above. The plasmid was then linearized with primers YZ95 and YZ96, and ligated to the BsaI-zeoR-BsaI cassette as described above. Thus, pBRX2 is a lower-copy analog of pUCX2.

Construction of Golden Gate Destination Plasmids for pCas9 and pAIO.

To create pCas9-Multi, the Golden Gate destination plasmid for cloning sgRNA cassettes alongside Cas9, pPDAZ (38), and a PCR-amplified Cas9 gene (Primers JL126 and JL128, template Addgene plasmid #41815) were digested with KpnI and XbaI, and ligated to create pCas9(-). This plasmid and a PCR-amplified GFPT2-sgRNA cassette (template Addgene plasmid #41820, which contains the sgRNA sequence; the proK promoter and terminator were introduced by PCR) were digested with SalI and ligated to create pCas9-GFPT2. This plasmid was then linearized with primers BL557 and BL558 (to remove the BsmBI recognition sites within Cas9) and circularized via Gibson Assembly (39). The resulting plasmid was then linearized with primers BL559 and BL560 (to reintroduce two BsmBI sites in the plasmid backbone), and circularized via Gibson Assembly to yield pCas9-Multi, which was confirmed by sequencing with primers TG1 to TG6. Digestion of pCas9-Multi with BsmBI results in a linearized plasmid with overhangs that allow for the simultaneous cloning of one or more sgRNAs by Golden Gate Assembly (see SI Materials and Methods, sGRNA Cloning into pCas9 and pAIO).

To create pAIO-Multi, pCas9-Multi was linearized with primers BL731 and BL732 (to remove Cas9 and introduce BsaI recognition sites for UBP cloning), phosphorylated, and intramolecularly ligated, and confirmed by sequencing with primer BL450. Digestion of pAIO-Multi with BsaI results in a linearized plasmid with overhangs identical to the ones produced by BsaI digestion of the pUCX2 destination plasmid, and thus PCR-generated inserts for cloning the UBP into pUCX2 can also be used to clone the UBP into pAIO-Multi and its derivatives. After the sgRNA cassettes were cloned into pAIO-Multi (see SI Materials and Methods, sGRNA Cloning into pCas9 and pAIO), the Golden Gate Assembly protocol for cloning in a UBP was identical to the one described above for pUCX2, except the product of pAIO-Multi (with sgRNAs) amplified with BL731 and BL732 was used in place of the plasmid itself.

sgRNA Cloning into pCas9 and pAIO.

Dual sgRNA cassettes were cloned into pCas9-Multi or pAIO-Multi via Golden Gate Assembly. To generate the first sgRNA cassette of each pair, pCas9-GFPT2 (1 ng) was PCR-amplified with primers first sgRNA GG (200 nM) and BL562 (200 nM), and OneTaq DNA polymerase, under the following thermocycling conditions: [30 × (94 °C 0:30 | 52 °C 0:15 | 68 °C 0:30)]. PCR products were purified by agarose gel electrophoresis and purification. The first sgRNA GG primer is a 70-nt primer that possesses (from 5′ to 3′) a BsmBI restriction site, 10 nt of homology with the proK promoter, an 18-nt variable guide (spacer) complementary to a UBP mutation, and 25 nt of homology to the nonvariable sgRNA scaffold. To generate the second sgRNA cassette, pCas9-GFPT2 was PCR-amplified with primers BL563 and second sgRNA Rev, and primers BL566 and second sgRNA Fwd, and the resulting two products were combined and amplified by overlap extension PCR using primers BL563 and BL566, followed by agarose gel electrophoresis and purification.

To assemble the guide plasmids, pCas9-Multi (40 ng) or pAIO-Multi (20 ng), purified DNA of the first sgRNA cassette (4.5 ng) and second sgRNA cassette (8 ng), T4 DNA ligase (200 U), BsmBI (5 U), and ATP (1 mM) were combined in 1× NEB CutSmart reaction buffer (final volume 20 μL) and thermocycled under the following conditions: [5 × (37 °C 6:00 | 16 °C 8:00) 15 × (55 °C 6:00 | 16 °C 8:00)]. Assembled plasmids were transformed into electrocompetent cells for subsequent sequencing and testing.

To assemble pCas9-TK1-A, a plasmid containing only one sgRNA cassette, pCas9-GFPT2 was amplified with primers BL566 and BL567, and the resulting product was ligated into pCas9-Multi by Golden Gate Assembly as described above.

To assemble pCas9-hEGFP, a plasmid containing a nontarget sgRNA cassette for TK1 experiments, primers BL514 and BL515 were annealed and ligated, by Gibson Assembly, into pCas9-GFPT2 linearized with primers BL464 and BL465.

Construction of pAIO2X.

The pAIO2X GG, the Golden Gate destination plasmid for pAIO2X, is derived from three plasmids, using PCR-generated inserts and multiple steps of cloning by restriction enzyme digest and ligation. Inserts from pSYN36, which contains a codon-optimized superfolder gfp with a Golden Gate entry site for cloning in sequences that correspond to nucleotides 409 to 483 of gfp, and pET-22b-ESerGG, which contains an E. coli SerT gene with a Golden Gate entry site for cloning in sequences that correspond to nucleotides 10 to 65 of serT, were cloned into pAIO dual guide BsmBI, a version of pAIO-Multi that contains two sgRNA cassettes, with the targeting guide (spacer) sequences replaced by two orthogonal pairs of BsmBI recognition sites that enable guide cloning using annealed primer duplexes.

To create pAIO2X-GFP151/Eser-69 GG, annealed primer duplexes of YZ310/YZ316 and YZ359/YZ360 were ligated into pAIO2X GG using the same Golden Gate Assembly reagents and thermocycling conditions used for UBP cloning, with the exception that BsaI was replaced by BsmBI, each primer duplex was used at a 50:1 insert:plasmid molar ratio with 30 fmol of destination plasmid, and the reaction was scaled by one third to 10 μL. Following assembly, the reaction was not digested with additional enzymes or purified, and was directly transformed into chemically competent E. coli DH5α. Following isolation of single plasmid clones and confirmation of the guides by sequencing using primer BL450, the UBPs were cloned into the plasmid by Golden Gate assembly with BsaI, as described in Golden Gate Assembly of UBP-Containing Plasmids.

Cas9 in Vitro Cleavage Assay.

To generate the DNA substrates for in vitro Cas9 cleavage assays, templates BL408, BL409, BL410, BL487, BL488, and BL489 (1 ng per 50-μL reaction) were PCR-amplified with primers BL415 (400 nM) and BL416 (400 nM), and OneTaq DNA polymerase in 1× OneTaq standard reaction buffer supplemented with dNaMTP (100 μM), dTPT3TP (100 μM), and MgCl2 (1.5 mM), under the following thermocycling conditions: [25 × (95 °C 0:15 | 56 °C 0:15 | 68 °C 1:30)].

To generate the DNA templates for in vitro transcription of sgRNAs, templates BL318, BL484, BL485, and BL486 (1 ng per 50-μL reaction), which contain the T7 promoter and a CRISPR RNA (crRNA) spacer sequence, were PCR-amplified with primers BL472 (200 nM) and BL473 (200 nM), and OneTaq DNA polymerase in 1× OneTaq standard reaction buffer supplemented with MgCl2 (6 mM), under the following thermocycling conditions: [20 × (95 °C 0:15 | 60 °C 0:15 | 68 °C 1:30)]. DNA from this first PCR (0.5 μL) was then transferred into a second PCR (100 μL) containing primers BL472 (400 nM), BL439 (500 nM), and BL440 (600 nM), and thermocycled under the following conditions: [4 × (95 °C 0:15 | 68 °C 0:15 | 68 °C 1:30) 20 × (95 °C 0:15 | 60 °C 0:15 | 68 °C 1:30)]. In vitro transcription of the PCR products with T7 RNA polymerase was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol, and transcribed sgRNAs were purified by PAGE, band excision, and extraction (37 °C, overnight) into an aqueous solution of NaCl (200 mM) and EDTA (1 mM, pH 7), followed by concentration and purification by ethanol precipitation.

For in vitro cleavage reactions, Cas9 nuclease (125 nM) was incubated with each transcribed sgRNA (125 nM) in 1 × Cas9 nuclease reaction buffer for 5 min, then DNA substrate was added, and the reaction was incubated (37 °C, 10 min). The reaction was quenched with SDS/PAGE loading buffer [62 mM Tris⋅HCl, 2.5% (wt/vol) SDS, 0.002% bromophenol blue, 0.7 M β-mercaptoethanol, and 10% (vol/vol) glycerol], heat-denatured (95 °C, 10 min), and then loaded onto an SDS/PAGE gel. The resulting cleavage bands were quantified by densitometric analysis using ImageJ (40). For each sgRNA, raw cleavage efficiencies were divided by the maximum cleavage observed for that sgRNA across the set of the six DNA substrates, to account for differences in sgRNA activity and/or minor variations in preparation. Experiments were performed in technical triplicate, and averages represent an average of three in vitro cleavage reactions performed in parallel.

Biotin Shift Depletion and in Vivo Mutation Analysis.

To determine the mutational spectrum of the UBP in isolated plasmid samples, biotin shift assays were performed as described in Materials and Methods, Biotin Shift Assay. Nonshifted bands, which correspond to natural mutations of the UBP-containing sequences, were excised and extracted (37 °C, overnight) into a minimal amount of an aqueous solution of NaCl (200 mM) and EDTA (1 mM, pH 7), followed by concentration and purification by ethanol precipitation. A sample of extract (1 μL) was PCR-amplified under standard conditions (natural dNTPs only), with OneTaq DNA polymerase and the same primers used for the biotin shift PCR, and the resulting products were sequenced by Sanger sequencing.

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by the National Institutes of Health Grant GM060005 (to F.E.R.), the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Grant DGE-1346837 (to A.W.F.), the National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant 21472036 (to L.L.), and the Labex ARCANE Grant ANR-11-LABX-0003-01 (to T.L.). The NanoBio-ICMG platforms (FR 2607) are acknowledged for their support. B.M.L. was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from the American Cancer Society, Illinois Division.

Footnotes

  • ↵1Y.Z. and B.M.L. contributed equally to this work.

  • ↵2To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: floyd{at}scripps.edu.
  • Author contributions: Y.Z., B.M.L., and F.E.R. designed research; Y.Z., B.M.L., A.W.F., A.X.Z., T.L., and L.L. performed research; Y.Z., B.M.L., and F.E.R. analyzed data; and Y.Z. and F.E.R. wrote the paper.

  • Conflict of interest statement: Y.Z., B.M.L., and F.E.R. have filed a patent application based on the use of Cas9 for enforced retention of the UBP. Y.Z. and F.E.R. have filed a patent application for the truncated transporter. F.E.R. has a financial interest (shares) in Synthorx Inc., a company that has commercial interests in the UBP. The other authors declare no other competing financial interests.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1616443114/-/DCSupplemental.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Malyshev DA,
    2. Romesberg FE
    (2015) The expanded genetic alphabet. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 54(41):11930–11944.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. ↵
    1. Zhang L, et al.
    (2015) Evolution of functional six-nucleotide DNA. J Am Chem Soc 137(21):6734–6737.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Kimoto M,
    2. Hirao I
    (2014) Creation of unnatural base pair systems toward new DNA/RNA biotechnologies. Chemical Biology of Nucleic Acids: Fundamentals and Clinical Applications, eds Erdmann AV, Markiewicz TW, Barciszewski J (Springer, Berlin), pp 131–148.
    .
  4. ↵
    1. Leduc S
    (1911) The Mechanisms of Life (Rebman, New York).
    .
  5. ↵
    1. Leconte AM, et al.
    (2008) Discovery, characterization, and optimization of an unnatural base pair for expansion of the genetic alphabet. J Am Chem Soc 130(7):2336–2343.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Dhami K, et al.
    (2014) Systematic exploration of a class of hydrophobic unnatural base pairs yields multiple new candidates for the expansion of the genetic alphabet. Nucleic Acids Res 42(16):10235–10244.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Lavergne T,
    2. Malyshev DA,
    3. Romesberg FE
    (2012) Major groove substituents and polymerase recognition of a class of predominantly hydrophobic unnatural base pairs. Chemistry 18(4):1231–1239.
    .
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Malyshev DA, et al.
    (2012) Efficient and sequence-independent replication of DNA containing a third base pair establishes a functional six-letter genetic alphabet. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(30):12005–12010.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Malyshev DA,
    2. Seo YJ,
    3. Ordoukhanian P,
    4. Romesberg FE
    (2009) PCR with an expanded genetic alphabet. J Am Chem Soc 131(41):14620–14621.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Seo YJ,
    2. Hwang GT,
    3. Ordoukhanian P,
    4. Romesberg FE
    (2009) Optimization of an unnatural base pair toward natural-like replication. J Am Chem Soc 131(9):3246–3252.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Betz K, et al.
    (2012) KlenTaq polymerase replicates unnatural base pairs by inducing a Watson-Crick geometry. Nat Chem Biol 8(7):612–614.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Betz K, et al.
    (2013) Structural insights into DNA replication without hydrogen bonds. J Am Chem Soc 135(49):18637–18643.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Ast M, et al.
    (2009) Diatom plastids depend on nucleotide import from the cytosol. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(9):3621–3626.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Malyshev DA, et al.
    (2014) A semi-synthetic organism with an expanded genetic alphabet. Nature 509(7500):385–388.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Goodman DB,
    2. Church GM,
    3. Kosuri S
    (2013) Causes and effects of N-terminal codon bias in bacterial genes. Science 342(6157):475–479.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Schlegel S,
    2. Genevaux P,
    3. de Gier JW
    (2015) De-convoluting the genetic adaptations of E. coli C41(DE3) in real time reveals how alleviating protein production stress improves yields. Cell Reports 10(10):1758–1766.
    .
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Li L, et al.
    (2014) Natural-like replication of an unnatural base pair for the expansion of the genetic alphabet and biotechnology applications. J Am Chem Soc 136(3):826–829.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Marraffini LA,
    2. Sontheimer EJ
    (2010) CRISPR interference: RNA-directed adaptive immunity in bacteria and archaea. Nat Rev Genet 11(3):181–190.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Horvath P,
    2. Barrangou R
    (2010) CRISPR/Cas, the immune system of bacteria and archaea. Science 327(5962):167–170.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Rath D,
    2. Amlinger L,
    3. Rath A,
    4. Lundgren M
    (2015) The CRISPR-Cas immune system: Biology, mechanisms and applications. Biochimie 117:119–128.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Hsu PD,
    2. Lander ES,
    3. Zhang F
    (2014) Development and applications of CRISPR-Cas9 for genome engineering. Cell 157(6):1262–1278.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Doudna JA,
    2. Charpentier E
    (2014) Genome editing. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science 346(6213):1258096.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Fu Y,
    2. Sander JD,
    3. Reyon D,
    4. Cascio VM,
    5. Joung JK
    (2014) Improving CRISPR-Cas nuclease specificity using truncated guide RNAs. Nat Biotechnol 32(3):279–284.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Jinek M, et al.
    (2012) A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337(6096):816–821.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Simmon VF,
    2. Lederberg S
    (1972) Degradation of bacteriophage lambda deoxyribonucleic acid after restriction by Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol 112(1):161–169.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Haferkamp I, et al.
    (2006) Tapping the nucleotide pool of the host: Novel nucleotide carrier proteins of Protochlamydia amoebophila. Mol Microbiol 60(6):1534–1545.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Miroux B,
    2. Walker JE
    (1996) Over-production of proteins in Escherichia coli: Mutant hosts that allow synthesis of some membrane proteins and globular proteins at high levels. J Mol Biol 260(3):289–298.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Takeshita S,
    2. Sato M,
    3. Toba M,
    4. Masahashi W,
    5. Hashimoto-Gotoh T
    (1987) High-copy-number and low-copy-number plasmid vectors for lacZ alpha-complementation and chloramphenicol- or kanamycin-resistance selection. Gene 61(1):63–74.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Deuschle U,
    2. Kammerer W,
    3. Gentz R,
    4. Bujard H
    (1986) Promoters of Escherichia coli: A hierarchy of in vivo strength indicates alternate structures. EMBO J 5(11):2987–2994.
    .
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Sabri S,
    2. Steen JA,
    3. Bongers M,
    4. Nielsen LK,
    5. Vickers CE
    (2013) Knock-in/Knock-out (KIKO) vectors for rapid integration of large DNA sequences, including whole metabolic pathways, onto the Escherichia coli chromosome at well-characterised loci. Microb Cell Fact 12:60.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Kuhlman TE,
    2. Cox EC
    (2010) Site-specific chromosomal integration of large synthetic constructs. Nucleic Acids Res 38(6):e92.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Khlebnikov A,
    2. Keasling JD
    (2002) Effect of lacY expression on homogeneity of induction from the P(tac) and P(trc) promoters by natural and synthetic inducers. Biotechnol Prog 18(3):672–674.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Sikorski RS,
    2. Hieter P
    (1989) A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 122(1):19–27.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Gietz D,
    2. St Jean A,
    3. Woods RA,
    4. Schiestl RH
    (1992) Improved method for high efficiency transformation of intact yeast cells. Nucleic Acids Res 20(6):1425.
    .
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Datsenko KA,
    2. Wanner BL
    (2000) One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97(12):6640–6645.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Quan J,
    2. Tian J
    (2011) Circular polymerase extension cloning for high-throughput cloning of complex and combinatorial DNA libraries. Nat Protoc 6(2):242–251.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Engler C,
    2. Kandzia R,
    3. Marillonnet S
    (2008) A one pot, one step, precision cloning method with high throughput capability. PLoS One 3(11):e3647.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Guo J,
    2. Gaj T,
    3. Barbas CF 3rd
    (2010) Directed evolution of an enhanced and highly efficient FokI cleavage domain for zinc finger nucleases. J Mol Biol 400(1):96–107.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Gibson DG, et al.
    (2009) Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat Methods 6(5):343–345.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Schneider CA,
    2. Rasband WS,
    3. Eliceiri KW
    (2012) NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9(7):671–675.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Yanisch-Perron C,
    2. Vieira J,
    3. Messing J
    (1985) Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: Nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors. Gene 33(1):103–119.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
A semisynthetic organism engineered for the stable expansion of the genetic alphabet
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Engineered organism with expanded genetic alphabet
Yorke Zhang, Brian M. Lamb, Aaron W. Feldman, Anne Xiaozhou Zhou, Thomas Lavergne, Lingjun Li, Floyd E. Romesberg
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Feb 2017, 114 (6) 1317-1322; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1616443114

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Engineered organism with expanded genetic alphabet
Yorke Zhang, Brian M. Lamb, Aaron W. Feldman, Anne Xiaozhou Zhou, Thomas Lavergne, Lingjun Li, Floyd E. Romesberg
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Feb 2017, 114 (6) 1317-1322; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1616443114
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Article Classifications

  • Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry

This article has a Letter. Please see:

  • Relationship between Research Article and Letter - August 02, 2017

See related content:

  • Unnatural base pairs expand the genetic alphabet
    - Aug 02, 2017
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 114 (6)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results and Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Materials and Methods
    • SI Materials and Methods
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Water from a faucet fills a glass.
News Feature: How “forever chemicals” might impair the immune system
Researchers are exploring whether these ubiquitous fluorinated molecules might worsen infections or hamper vaccine effectiveness.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Dmitry Naumov.
Reflection of clouds in the still waters of Mono Lake in California.
Inner Workings: Making headway with the mysteries of life’s origins
Recent experiments and simulations are starting to answer some fundamental questions about how life came to be.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Radoslaw Lecyk.
Cave in coastal Kenya with tree growing in the middle.
Journal Club: Small, sharp blades mark shift from Middle to Later Stone Age in coastal Kenya
Archaeologists have long tried to define the transition between the two time periods.
Image credit: Ceri Shipton.
Mouse fibroblast cells. Electron bifurcation reactions keep mammalian cells alive.
Exploring electron bifurcation
Jonathon Yuly, David Beratan, and Peng Zhang investigate how electron bifurcation reactions work.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Panda bear hanging in a tree
How horse manure helps giant pandas tolerate cold
A study finds that giant pandas roll in horse manure to increase their cold tolerance.
Image credit: Fuwen Wei.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Cozzarelli Prize
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490