Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
Letter

Mesodinium rubrum: The symbiosis that wasn’t

Matthew D. Johnson, Erica Lasek-Nesselquist, Holly V. Moeller, Andreas Altenburger, Nina Lundholm, Miran Kim, Kirstine Drumm, Øjvind Moestrup, and View ORCID ProfilePer Juel Hansen
  1. aBiology Department, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543;
  2. bWadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY 12208;
  3. cDepartment of Ecology, Evolution & Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106;
  4. dNatural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark;
  5. eMarine Biological Section, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS February 14, 2017 114 (7) E1040-E1042; first published February 1, 2017; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1619247114
Matthew D. Johnson
aBiology Department, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: mattjohnson@whoi.edu
Erica Lasek-Nesselquist
bWadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY 12208;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Holly V. Moeller
cDepartment of Ecology, Evolution & Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andreas Altenburger
dNatural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nina Lundholm
dNatural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Miran Kim
eMarine Biological Section, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kirstine Drumm
eMarine Biological Section, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Øjvind Moestrup
eMarine Biological Section, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Per Juel Hansen
eMarine Biological Section, Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Per Juel Hansen
  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Qiu et al. (1) report that a red tide of the photosynthetic ciliate Mesodinium rubrum in Long Island Sound “farms” symbiotic Teleaulax amphioxeia cells within its cytoplasm. M. rubrum has long been studied for causing red tides (2⇓⇓–5), and laboratory culture work on multiple strains from around the world has shown that M. rubrum extracts organelles from ingested cryptophyte algae, including chloroplasts, mitochondria, cytoplasm, and a transcriptionally active nucleus, or kleptokaryon (6, 7). M. rubrum functions like a true phototroph, with the ability to regulate and divide chloroplasts (7).

The conclusions of Qiu et al. (1), based on a single field sample, contrast sharply with these previously published studies of M. rubrum. Their conclusions are based on (i) their inference that “complete” prey metatranscriptomes indicate metabolically intact prey cells and (ii) their visual observation, using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), of intact prey cells. However, we believe that these findings do not provide sufficient evidence to support the extraordinary claim by Qiu et al. (1) that M. rubrum farms prey cells.

First, the authors argue that the expression of genes involved in membrane transporters, nucleus-to-cytoplasm RNA transporters, and all major metabolic pathways is evidence of intact cryptophyte symbionts. Here we show data from a temperate strain of M. rubrum (clade G) that indicate that many cryptophyte gene pathways are expressed at levels equal to or greater than in T. amphioxeia even when only prey organelles remain (Table 1 and Fig. 1). One exception is expression levels of ABC-like transporters, which were observed to be at even lower numbers in Qui et al. (1). Furthermore, we have previously shown similar transcriptional patterns of highly expressed cryptophyte genes in an Antarctic M. rubrum culture (clade A) (8). In addition, because genomes or transcriptomes of the target organisms were not used for annotation (1) there is a high degree of uncertainty in assigning transcript identity.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Comparison of key metabolic pathways (reads per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads) in the T. amphioxeia-derived kleptokaryon of M. rubrum (KN) and free-living T. amphioxeia (TA)

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Transmission electron micrograph of Mesodinium rubrum (CBJR05; clade G) fed T. amphioxeia (GCEP01). The image shows a lateral cross-section of an M. rubrum cell revealing at least nine plastid complexes and a recently ingested T. amphioxeia cell (also a cross-section) within a vacuole (white arrow) in the center. Note the ingested cell’s periplast membrane and cytoplasm surrounding the chloroplast, and the vacuolar space surrounding it. In this image the cytoplasm of the cryptophyte organelle complexes is lighter than that of the ciliate, revealing that large portions of M. rubrum cells are devoted to hosting stolen organelles. Ciliate cytoplasm and many of the organelles in the image of Qiu et al. (1) are missing or unrecognizable, respectively.

Second, Qiu et al. (1) report intact cryptophyte cells inside M. rubrum. However, their TEM images are inconclusive due to (i) low resolution (ii), extraordinarily poor fixation quality, and (iii) unusually small cryptophyte organelles, compounding the interpretation of the low-resolution images. No clear cell membrane, which would include cytoplasm completely surrounding the chloroplast, is visible around the cryptophyte organelles in their images. Rather, they seem to be organelle complexes that are packed into a membrane, consistent with previous observations (9). Furthermore, in other M. rubrum recently ingested intact cryptophytes seem to be in a vacuole before organelle extraction (Fig. 1) (10).

M. rubrum-like ciliates are complex organisms that do not fit into established “boxes” for trophic modes or cellular organization. However, we have previously shown that their unique mode of acquired phototrophy is capable of “farming” cryptophyte organelles when the kleptokaryon is present (7), and there is no evidence for maintenance of intact symbionts within any cultures of the ciliate. We firmly believe that the conclusions of Qiu et al. (1) do not represent a new association in M. rubrum but rather illustrate the actual difficulties of accurately interpreting “snapshots” of natural populations.

Acknowledgments

M.D.J. and E.L.-N. were supported by National Science Foundation Integrative and Organismal Systems Award 1354773.

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: mattjohnson{at}whoi.edu.
  • Author contributions: M.D.J. designed research; M.D.J. and E.L.-N. performed research; M.D.J. and E.L.-N. analyzed data; and M.D.J., E.L.-N., H.V.M., A.A., N.L., M.K., K.D., Ø.M., and P.J.H. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Qiu D,
    2. Huang L,
    3. Lin S
    (2016) Cryptophyte farming by symbiotic ciliate host detected in situ. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113(43):12208–12213.
    .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Crawford DW
    (1989) Mesodinium rubrum: The phytoplankter that wasn’t. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 58(1-2):161–174.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. ↵
    1. Hansen PJ,
    2. Nielsen LT,
    3. Johnson M,
    4. Berge T,
    5. Flynn KJ
    (2013) Acquired phototrophy in Mesodinium and Dinophysis–A review of cellular organization, prey selectivity, nutrient uptake and bioenergetics. Harmful Algae 28:126–139.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    1. Herfort L,
    2. Peterson TD,
    3. Campbell V,
    4. Futrell S,
    5. Zuber P
    (2011) Myrionecta rubra (Mesodinium rubrum) bloom initiation in the Columbia River estuary. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 95(4):440–446.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. ↵
    1. Taylor FJR,
    2. Blackbourn DJ,
    3. Blackbourn J
    (1969) Ultrastructure of the chloroplasts and associated structures within the marine ciliate Mesodinium rubrum (Lohmann). Nature 224:819–821.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. ↵
    1. Gustafson DE Jr,
    2. Stoecker DK,
    3. Johnson MD,
    4. Van Heukelem WF,
    5. Sneider K
    (2000) Cryptophyte algae are robbed of their organelles by the marine ciliate Mesodinium rubrum. Nature 405(6790):1049–1052.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Johnson MD,
    2. Oldach D,
    3. Delwiche CF,
    4. Stoecker DK
    (2007) Retention of transcriptionally active cryptophyte nuclei by the ciliate Myrionecta rubra. Nature 445(7126):426–428.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Lasek-Nesselquist E,
    2. Wisecaver JH,
    3. Hackett JD,
    4. Johnson MD
    (2015) Insights into transcriptional changes that accompany organelle sequestration from the stolen nucleus of Mesodinium rubrum. BMC Genomics 16:805.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Garcia-Cuetos L,
    2. Moestrup Ø,
    3. Hansen PJ
    (2012) Studies on the genus Mesodinium II. Ultrastructural and molecular investigations of five marine species help clarifying the taxonomy. J Eukaryot Microbiol 59(4):374–400.
    .
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Nam SW,
    2. Park JW,
    3. Yih W,
    4. Park MG,
    5. Shin W
    (2016) The fate of cryptophyte cell organelles in the ciliate Mesodinium cf. rubrum subjected to starvation. Harmful Algae 59:19–30.
    .
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Mesodinium rubrum: The symbiosis that wasn’t
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Organelle thief
Matthew D. Johnson, Erica Lasek-Nesselquist, Holly V. Moeller, Andreas Altenburger, Nina Lundholm, Miran Kim, Kirstine Drumm, Øjvind Moestrup, Per Juel Hansen
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Feb 2017, 114 (7) E1040-E1042; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1619247114

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Organelle thief
Matthew D. Johnson, Erica Lasek-Nesselquist, Holly V. Moeller, Andreas Altenburger, Nina Lundholm, Miran Kim, Kirstine Drumm, Øjvind Moestrup, Per Juel Hansen
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Feb 2017, 114 (7) E1040-E1042; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1619247114
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Article Classifications

  • Biological Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences

This Letter has a Reply and related content. Please see:

  • Relationship between Letter and Reply - February 01, 2017
  • Cryptophyte farming by symbiotic ciliate host detected in situ - October 10, 2016
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 114 (7)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Smoke emanates from Japan’s Fukushima nuclear power plant a few days after tsunami damage
Core Concept: Muography offers a new way to see inside a multitude of objects
Muons penetrate much further than X-rays, they do essentially zero damage, and they are provided for free by the cosmos.
Image credit: Science Source/Digital Globe.
Water from a faucet fills a glass.
News Feature: How “forever chemicals” might impair the immune system
Researchers are exploring whether these ubiquitous fluorinated molecules might worsen infections or hamper vaccine effectiveness.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Dmitry Naumov.
Venus flytrap captures a fly.
Journal Club: Venus flytrap mechanism could shed light on how plants sense touch
One protein seems to play a key role in touch sensitivity for flytraps and other meat-eating plants.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Kuttelvaserova Stuchelova.
Illustration of groups of people chatting
Exploring the length of human conversations
Adam Mastroianni and Daniel Gilbert explore why conversations almost never end when people want them to.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Panda bear hanging in a tree
How horse manure helps giant pandas tolerate cold
A study finds that giant pandas roll in horse manure to increase their cold tolerance.
Image credit: Fuwen Wei.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Cozzarelli Prize
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490