Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology
Research Article

Contribution of NIH funding to new drug approvals 2010–2016

View ORCID ProfileEkaterina Galkina Cleary, Jennifer M. Beierlein, Navleen Surjit Khanuja, Laura M. McNamee, and Fred D. Ledley
PNAS March 6, 2018 115 (10) 2329-2334; first published February 12, 2018; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715368115
Ekaterina Galkina Cleary
aCenter for Integration of Science and Industry, Bentley University, Waltham, MA 02452;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ekaterina Galkina Cleary
Jennifer M. Beierlein
aCenter for Integration of Science and Industry, Bentley University, Waltham, MA 02452;
bDepartment of Natural and Applied Sciences, Bentley University, Waltham, MA 02452;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Navleen Surjit Khanuja
aCenter for Integration of Science and Industry, Bentley University, Waltham, MA 02452;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Laura M. McNamee
aCenter for Integration of Science and Industry, Bentley University, Waltham, MA 02452;
bDepartment of Natural and Applied Sciences, Bentley University, Waltham, MA 02452;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fred D. Ledley
aCenter for Integration of Science and Industry, Bentley University, Waltham, MA 02452;
bDepartment of Natural and Applied Sciences, Bentley University, Waltham, MA 02452;
cDepartment of Management, Bentley University, Waltham, MA 02452
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: fledley@bentley.edu
  1. Edited by Solomon H. Snyder, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, and approved December 27, 2017 (received for review September 1, 2017)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Significance

This report shows that NIH funding contributed to published research associated with every one of the 210 new drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration from 2010–2016. Collectively, this research involved >200,000 years of grant funding totaling more than $100 billion. The analysis shows that >90% of this funding represents basic research related to the biological targets for drug action rather than the drugs themselves. The role of NIH funding thus complements industry research and development, which focuses predominantly on applied research. This work underscores the breath and significance of public investment in the development of new therapeutics and the risk that reduced research funding would slow the pipeline for treating morbid disease.

Abstract

This work examines the contribution of NIH funding to published research associated with 210 new molecular entities (NMEs) approved by the Food and Drug Administration from 2010–2016. We identified >2 million publications in PubMed related to the 210 NMEs (n = 131,092) or their 151 known biological targets (n = 1,966,281). Of these, >600,000 (29%) were associated with NIH-funded projects in RePORTER. This funding included >200,000 fiscal years of NIH project support (1985–2016) and project costs >$100 billion (2000–2016), representing ∼20% of the NIH budget over this period. NIH funding contributed to every one of the NMEs approved from 2010–2016 and was focused primarily on the drug targets rather than on the NMEs themselves. There were 84 first-in-class products approved in this interval, associated with >$64 billion of NIH-funded projects. The percentage of fiscal years of project funding identified through target searches, but not drug searches, was greater for NMEs discovered through targeted screening than through phenotypic methods (95% versus 82%). For targeted NMEs, funding related to targets preceded funding related to the NMEs, consistent with the expectation that basic research provides validated targets for targeted screening. This analysis, which captures basic research on biological targets as well as applied research on NMEs, suggests that the NIH contribution to research associated with new drug approvals is greater than previously appreciated and highlights the risk of reducing federal funding for basic biomedical research.

  • NIH funding
  • drug development
  • basic science
  • translational science

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: fledley{at}bentley.edu.
  • Author contributions: E.G.C., J.M.B., L.M.M., and F.D.L. designed research; E.G.C., J.M.B., N.S.K., L.M.M., and F.D.L. performed research; E.G.C., J.M.B., N.S.K., and F.D.L. analyzed data; and E.G.C. and F.D.L. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1715368115/-/DCSupplemental.

  • Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND).

View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Contribution of NIH funding to new drug approvals 2010–2016
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Contribution of NIH funding to new drug approvals
Ekaterina Galkina Cleary, Jennifer M. Beierlein, Navleen Surjit Khanuja, Laura M. McNamee, Fred D. Ledley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Mar 2018, 115 (10) 2329-2334; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1715368115

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Contribution of NIH funding to new drug approvals
Ekaterina Galkina Cleary, Jennifer M. Beierlein, Navleen Surjit Khanuja, Laura M. McNamee, Fred D. Ledley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Mar 2018, 115 (10) 2329-2334; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1715368115
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 115 (10)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Article Classifications

  • Social Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Future of artificial intelligence
Future of artificial intelligence
Eric Horvitz discusses AI’s promises and perils.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Doctor and young boy sitting at a table wearing protective face masks.
Opinion: A risk–benefit framework for human research during the COVID-19 pandemic
To safely and ethically restart more of the human research portfolio, institutions must develop an explicit plan for managing human research during the pandemic.
Image credit: Carey Lumeng (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI).
Core Concept: The pandemic is prompting widespread use—and misuse—of real-world data
It's an unprecedented opportunity to leverage diverse, real-world data sources. But the need for speed shouldn’t come at the expense of methodological rigor.
Image credit: Shutterstock/keyframelab.
Humming bird in flight
Wild hummingbirds see nonspectral colors
Wild hummingbirds can perceive a variety of nonspectral colors, accessing a rich color space for foraging, communication, and mate choice.
Image credit: Noah Whiteman (University of California, Berkeley, CA).
Alaska's Unmark Island
Volcanic eruption’s effects on Roman Republic
A massive volcanic eruption in Alaska in 43 BCE coincided with the fall of the Roman Republic and the subsequent rise of the Roman empire.
Image credit: Kerry Key (Columbia University, New York, NY).

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2020 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490