Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology
Research Article

Economics- and policy-driven organic carbon input enhancement dominates soil organic carbon accumulation in Chinese croplands

Yongcun Zhao, Meiyan Wang, Shuijin Hu, Xudong Zhang, Zhu Ouyang, Ganlin Zhang, Biao Huang, Shiwei Zhao, Jinshui Wu, Deti Xie, Bo Zhu, Dongsheng Yu, Xianzhang Pan, Shengxiang Xu, and Xuezheng Shi
PNAS April 17, 2018 115 (16) 4045-4050; first published April 16, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1700292114
Yongcun Zhao
aState Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Meiyan Wang
aState Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shuijin Hu
bCollege of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China;
cDepartment of Entomology and Plant Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xudong Zhang
dInstitute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zhu Ouyang
eKey Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ganlin Zhang
aState Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Biao Huang
fKey Laboratory of Soil Environment and Pollution Remediation, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shiwei Zhao
gState Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Yangling 712100, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jinshui Wu
hKey Laboratory of Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Regions, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Changsha 410125, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Deti Xie
iCollege of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bo Zhu
jKey Laboratory of Mountain Surface Process and Ecological Regulation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dongsheng Yu
aState Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xianzhang Pan
aState Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shengxiang Xu
aState Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Xuezheng Shi
aState Key Laboratory of Soil and Sustainable Agriculture, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: xzshi@issas.ac.cn
  1. Edited by Susan E. Trumbore, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany, and approved August 22, 2017 (received for review February 13, 2017)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Significance

Soil organic carbon (C) stock in Chinese croplands increased by about 140 kg C ha−1 year−1 from 1980 to 2011. This soil organic C sequestration was largely due to drastic changes in management practices, such as fertilization, tillage, and residue treatments, induced by economic and policy incentives. Our analysis also indicates that excessive N inputs and inability to incorporate residue C into deeper soils will likely constrain the future C sequestration in Chinese croplands. These findings provide new insights into the causes and limitations of economics- and policy-driven soil C sequestration in China and offer some guidance for soil C management in many developing countries that are going through the similar economic and social transformations.

Abstract

China’s croplands have experienced drastic changes in management practices, such as fertilization, tillage, and residue treatments, since the 1980s. There is an ongoing debate about the impact of these changes on soil organic carbon (SOC) and its implications. Here we report results from an extensive study that provided direct evidence of cropland SOC sequestration in China. Based on the soil sampling locations recorded by the Second National Soil Survey of China in 1980, we collected 4,060 soil samples in 2011 from 58 counties that represent the typical cropping systems across China. Our results showed that across the country, the average SOC stock in the topsoil (0–20 cm) increased from 28.6 Mg C ha−1 in 1980 to 32.9 Mg C ha−1 in 2011, representing a net increase of 140 kg C ha−1 year−1. However, the SOC change differed among the major agricultural regions: SOC increased in all major agronomic regions except in Northeast China. The SOC sequestration was largely attributed to increased organic inputs driven by economics and policy: while higher root biomass resulting from enhanced crop productivity by chemical fertilizers predominated before 2000, higher residue inputs following the large-scale implementation of crop straw/stover return policy took over thereafter. The SOC change was negatively related to N inputs in East China, suggesting that the excessive N inputs, plus the shallowness of plow layers, may constrain the future C sequestration in Chinese croplands. Our results indicate that cropland SOC sequestration can be achieved through effectively manipulating economic and policy incentives to farmers.

  • soil organic carbon
  • Chinese cropland
  • crop residue management
  • carbon sequestration

Soil organic carbon (SOC) in croplands is the core of soil fertility that ensures crop production and food security, while affecting climate conditions via mediating greenhouse gas emissions (1, 2). The net SOC stock depends on the balance between organic C inputs and C effluxes via microbial decomposition (3). Agricultural practices profoundly affect cropland SOC (particularly in the topsoil) by directly altering organic C inputs and indirectly modifying the environmental conditions for microbes (4).

Agricultural production in China supports nearly 20% of the world population with less than 10% of the world’s arable land. From 1980 to 2010, China’s agriculture has immensely intensified, with new crop cultivars and high inputs of chemical fertilizers and pesticides, leading to 65% increases in cereal grain yields (5). The impact of this intensification on SOC has recently drawn major attention from the scientific community and decision-makers because changes in SOC may not only affect future food production, but also water and soil quality, as well as greenhouse gas emissions. Consequently, many studies have examined SOC changes, but most estimates were local or regional (6, 7). Only a few studies estimated the SOC changes at the national scale, and their results were highly variable or even contrasting (8⇓⇓–11). Nationwide estimates using process models tended to show some SOC losses, and attributed these losses to low C inputs, in particular through crop straw/stover incorporation (8, 10). In contrast, long-term soil fertility monitoring and field investigations often found an opposite trend and attributed the observed gain to increased residue incorporation (9, 11). Therefore, the underlying mechanisms or processes that dominated the SOC dynamics at the national scale are still not fully understood. However, knowledge of these mechanisms or processes is critical for sustainable management of croplands to support an increasing population while maintaining their environmental functions.

Here we report results from a nationally coordinated effort that examined SOC and associated crop management data from 4,060 sites in 58 counties (Fig. S1) that represent a typical cropping system across China. The sampling sites were either identical or very adjacent to the soil sampling locations recorded by the Second National Soil Survey of China in 1980 (see Materials and Methods for details). We determined the changes in SOC over the three decades and identified the dominant agronomic, economic, and policy drivers and their implications for future C sequestration in Chinese croplands.

Results and Discussion

SOC Stocks and Crop Residue Return.

The area-weighted mean SOC stock (0–20 cm) in 2011, as represented by 58 counties across China, was 32.90 Mg C ha−1, with a 95% confidence interval of 32.34–33.47 Mg C ha−1 (Table 1). The SOC stock varied significantly among regions, ranging from about 21.0 Mg C ha−1 in Northwest and North China, to 42.2 Mg C ha−1 in Northeast China. SOC stocks in the southern parts of China (including Southwest, South Central, and East China) were intermediate, ranging from ∼30.0–34.1 Mg C ha−1. Area-weighted mean SOC stocks among the 58 counties investigated also exhibited substantial variations with the county level SOC stock, ranging from 13.2 to 69.6 Mg C ha−1 (Table S1). The average amount of residue return via crop straw/stover incorporation (that is, the plant residues were left in place and plowed into the soil rather than burned or removed) in 2011 was 0.89 Mg C ha−1 (Table 1). Crop straw/stover input was highest in North China, at an average of 1.38 Mg C ha−1, and was lowest in Northeast China, with only 0.39 Mg C ha−1 in 2011 (Table 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Area-weighted mean SOC stocks (0–20 cm) and amounts of returned crop straw/stover in 2011 (N refers to the number of counties investigated; the lower and upper limits of SOC stock refer to the 95% confidence intervals of the bootstrap estimates)

SOC Stock Changes Between 1980 and 2011.

The topsoil SOC stock (0–20 cm) in Chinese croplands increased from 28.56 Mg C ha−1 (27.91–29.23 Mg C ha−1) in 1980 to 32.90 Mg C ha−1 (32.34–33.47 Mg C ha−1) in 2011 (Fig. 1 and Table 1). Net increment of SOC stocks during that period was 4.34 Mg C ha−1 (3.44–5.22 Mg C ha−1) (Fig. 1), representing an average increase of 140 kg C ha−1 y−1 (111–168 kg C ha−1 y−1). Overall, cropland soils in China functioned as a significant carbon sink during this period. However, there was a significant difference in the SOC stock among the major agronomic regions: SOC stocks in croplands of East China, South Central China, Southwest China, North China, and Northwest China increased by 8.33, 6.67, 5.49, 5.14, and 2.84 Mg C ha−1, respectively, while croplands in Northeast China lost 0.41 Mg C ha−1 (Fig. 1), equivalent to ∼1% of the baseline SOC stock in 1980.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Area-weighted mean SOC stocks (0–20 cm) in croplands of China’s six agronomic regions (EC, East China; NC, North China; NE, Northeast China; NW, Northwest China; SC, South Central China; and SW, Southwest China). Bars represent 95% confidence intervals of the bootstrap estimates.

The SOC sequestration rate in China was significantly higher than in Europe and the United States. Across England and Wales, Bellamy et al. (12) reported a C loss of about 300 kg C ha−1 y−1 from the upper 15-cm soils over the period of 1978–2003. Similarly, repeated sampling of Belgian cropland soils indicated a mean annual soil C loss of 760 kg C ha−1 between 1989 and 1999 (13, 14). The estimates across Europe were more variable. Based on the compiled SOC inventory data, Ciais et al. (15) inferred a mean C loss of 170 kg C ha−1 y−1 for croplands of EU-25 over the past several decades. Results from three process-based models disagreed on the direction and magnitude of change, from a loss of 76 kg C ha−1 y−1 to a gain of 150 kg C ha−1 y−1 (15). Still, these numbers were significantly lower than what were estimated by Janssens et al. (13), who reported a loss of 900 (±500) kg C ha−1 y−1. In the United States, estimates using the inventory method developed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change indicated a moderate amount of SOC accumulation in United States cropland soils (upper 30 cm) at 28–35 kg C ha−1 y−1 from 1982 to 1997 (16). The Century model estimated that SOC stocks in United States croplands increased by 38 and 45 kg C ha−1 y−1 from 1990 to 1995 and from 1995 to 2000, respectively (17).

The total SOC stock in topsoils of Chinese croplands increased by 0.56 Pg C (cropland area: 130 M ha) over the last three decades, with a rate of change at 18.1 Tg C y−1. Using the average soil C:N of 10.5 derived from 4,060 soil samples in 2011, we estimated that about 53 Mt N was simultaneously stored in the soils. The sequestrated N in the increased soil organic matter (SOM) is approximately equivalent to 2.2 times China’s N fertilizer consumption in 2014 (23.93 Mt, National Bureau of Statistics of China, data.stats.gov.cn), indicating that cropland C sequestration also has significant benefits to soil nutrient supplies.

Driving Factors for SOC Changes.

Correlation analysis using county-level rates of SOC stock change, climate, initial soil property, and management practice data (Table 2) showed that SOC stock changes in Chinese croplands were positively correlated with mean annual temperature, N fertilizer input, and crop residue C input, but negatively correlated with the initial SOC stock. The partial correlation and stepwise regression analyses further revealed that clay content was another important factor affecting SOC stock changes, while excluding the effect of all other factors (Table 2). While temperature influenced SOC turnover through affecting microbial activities (18), clay content influences SOC concentrations through its control on accumulation and mineralization. Therefore, soils with high clay content may provide physical and chemical protection of organic matter from decomposition (19).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Correlation coefficients and stepwise regression model between county-level rate of SOC change (SOCrate) and climate (mean annual temperature, MAT; and mean annual precipitation, MAP), initial soil properties (sand, silt, and clay content; soil pH in 1980, pH1980; and SOC stock in 1980, SOC1980), and management practices (cumulative N fertilizer input, NfNinput; and average crop residue carbon input, ResidueCinput) (n = 58)

Initial SOC levels accounted for more than 30% of the variation in observed changes in SOC stocks (Fig. S2A). The inversely proportional effect of the initial SOC on the SOC change (negative baseline effect) (Fig. S2A) indicated that cropland SOC in China was not at steady state in 1980. The initial SOC stocks in most Chinese croplands in 1980 were very low (except for the black soil region in Northeast China) due to 1,000 y of cultivation and continual agricultural use (20). Furthermore, in the vast North China Plain, most croplands were recently reclaimed from saline and alkaline lands with extremely low productivity and organic C (7). In the Loess Plateau of Northwest China, soil erosion is a major cause of initial low soil C stock (21). Chinese croplands had an initial SOC stock (upper 20 cm) of about 26.63–28.56 Mg C ha−1 in 1980, based on different estimates using the Second National Soil Survey data (Table S2). In contrast, Europe and the United States had much higher initial SOC stocks, being about 40.2 and 43.67 Mg C ha−1, respectively (Table S2). For example, cropland soils in Belgium had a SOC stock of 38 and 39 Mg C ha−1 in 1960 and 1990, respectively and have lost C since (Table S2). In addition, application of N fertilizer is often recommended to increase SOC on cropping lands that have low SOC due to long-term cultivation (2), because N fertilizer affects crop dry matter production and therefore C inputs to soils. Crop straw/stover incorporation influences the direct C inputs to soils. High crop residue C and N fertilizer inputs were often associated with high rates of SOC changes (Figs. S2B and S3A). Together, these results imply that the low initial SOC stocks in 1980 provided prerequisites for the SOC sequestration that was primarily due to enhancement of crop residue inputs.

Causes of Soil C Sequestration.

Our results, together with the SOC inventory estimates by Yan et al. (11) and data from a meta-analysis of cropland soil monitoring literatures by Pan et al. (9), confirmed that cropland soils in China functioned as a significant carbon sink over the last three decades. The net increase in SOC indicates that organic C inputs were quantitatively higher than organic C losses (mainly through decomposition). Because soil C losses were likely associated with organic C inputs, we examined the C inputs during this period of rapid transformation of agriculture in China.

Organic material inputs to Chinese croplands went through three distinct stages that were closely related to the social and economic changes over the past decades. The first stage was characterized by low organic material inputs in the late 1970s (Fig. 2A). Labor-intensive manuring and plowing was a common practice then, whereas chemical fertilization was very limited, resulting in low crop productivity. Crop straw/stover in this stage was mainly used as a fuel/fodder; even crop roots (i.e., corn root) were dug out for fuel (22). Consequently, limited farmyard manure production, low root biomass input to soil, and crop residue removal limited the potential for soil C accumulation. The second stage (1980–1999) was dictated by steadily increasing inputs of root biomass resulting from chemical fertilization (Fig. 2B). Crop biomass and grain yield increased dramatically with the increasing chemical fertilizer inputs (23); only a small fraction of straw/stover was used for composting or as animal bedding and then returned to the field. Labor-intensive manuring and plowing practices decreased due to the decline in economic gains and the rising labor cost, compared with chemical fertilization (24). Labor shortage due to massive migration of farmers to cities and availability of alternative energy sources, such as coal and electricity, made dispersal of large amounts of residues a costly task. Straw burning began to appear in the 1990s. Although root inputs to soil increased significantly with increasing chemical fertilizer inputs, straw/stover return during this stage was still limited, constraining the soil C accumulation. The third stage started around 2000 when straw burning became the most common practice (25) to further reduce labor requirements. More importantly, intensive field burning activities caused severe air pollution, even closures of airports and highways. This prompted the government to enhance the monitoring of fire spots and ban straw burning through both administrative and economic penalties. In 1999, the crop residue return policy was strengthened, and implementation was required. To promote the implementation of crop residue return, the Chinese government introduced various economic incentives to the farmers and demonstration program (26), which led to more and more crop residues being returned to the soil.

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

Changes in agricultural managements and crop residue C inputs since 1980. (A) Changes in grain yield, chemical fertilizer consumption, and the rate of straw/stover return to soils in China since 1978. Grain production and chemical fertilizer data were sourced from National Bureau of Statistics of China (data.stats.gov.cn), and rates of crop straw/stover return were based on 4,060 sites in the 58 counties sampled in this study. (B) Changes in average C inputs across the 4,060 sites in the 58 counties investigated. C inputs through straw/stover incorporation were estimated using crop yield data recorded by county-level agricultural census, straw/stover return rate derived from 4,060 sites in the 58 counties, and the grain:straw ratios of 333 sampled plots across the 58 counties. C inputs by roots were estimated using the crop yield data reordered by county-level agricultural census and the root:grain ratios of 333 sampled plots across the 58 counties.

The first two stages were mainly economically driven. In the first stage, limited farmyard manure production and fuel/fodder utilization of crop straw/stover were the main causes. The second stage was driven by enhanced plant productivity and root biomass production resulting from increasing fertilizer inputs. The third stage was predominantly policy-driven. Policy-enforced aboveground residue return led to more organic C inputs. The rapid increase in C input of straw/stover since 2000 provided the largest benefits to SOC sequestration (27).

The primary drivers that dominated SOC dynamics in Chinese croplands in the last several decades were clearly different from those in other developed countries. Insufficient organic C inputs were the primary cause leading to SOC decreases in European countries (15): for example, reduced use of farmyard manure in Belgium (14, 28). In the United States, increases in SOC mainly stemmed from farmland conversion into grasslands encouraged by the United States federally funded Conservation Reserve Program (16, 17), and reducing tillage intensity in the mid-Continental United States (29). Since 1980, China has vigorously promoted conservation of lands, particular grasslands, and marginal croplands on hilly or mountainous regions, which has significantly enhanced the C intensity (30, 31). However, an increasing population and limited arable land leave little room for conservation practices, such as cropland set-aside and long-term no-till, which may reduce crop yields (32). China’s experience may be useful for many developing countries in Southeast and Southwest Asia. Carbon sequestration will mainly rely on increases in organic C inputs and the return of crop residues is of paramount importance.

Contributions of Crop Residue Inputs to SOC Sequestration.

Generally, increasing C input through return of crop residues can increase SOC concentration before the soil C is saturated. Across the 4,060 field sites in the 58 counties investigated, average straw/stover C inputs were minimal at first in 1980 and then increased since the early 1990s, whereas root C inputs increased continuously but at a slower rate (Fig. 2B). On average, the net increments of cumulative C inputs by crop roots and straw/stover were 7.96 and 10.67 Mg C ha−1, respectively, during the periods of 1980 and 2010.

Changes in average crop residue C inputs during 1980–1989 were characterized by small net C input (Fig. 2B). Straw/stover C inputs in this period were minimal, stabilized at a low level (mean C input was only 0.005 Mg C ha−1 y−1, whereas root C inputs were 0.57 Mg C ha−1 y−1). From 1990 to 1999, both straw/stover and root C inputs increased steadily, with a rate of 0.023 and 0.018 Mg C ha−1 y−1, respectively. After 2000, straw/stover C inputs increased rapidly, with a rate of 0.077 Mg C ha−1 y−1, while the rate of root C inputs stabilized at 0.016 Mg C ha−1 y−1 during this period. To quantify the apparent conversion rate of crop residue (root plus straw/stover) C inputs to SOC, a linear regression analysis of SOC change rates by crop residue C inputs at the county level was conducted (Fig. S2B). A slope of 0.163 for the fitted regression model revealed that, on average, 16.3% of the crop residue C inputs were retained in the topsoil of Chinese croplands over the last three decades. Incorporation of crop roots and straw/stover has resulted in a SOC increment of roughly 1.30 and 1.74 Mg C ha−1, respectively. Because the net increment of SOC over the last three decades was 4.34 Mg C ha−1 (Fig. 1), the contribution of other C inputs (i.e., manure) to SOC increment can be indirectly estimated at 1.30 Mg C ha−1. Consequently, the root, straw/stover, and other C inputs contributed to about 30%, 40%, and 30% of total SOC stock increment, respectively.

Effects of Chemical N Fertilizers on SOC Sequestration.

Enhanced crop biomass production resulting from increasing fertilizer inputs, in particular low-cost N fertilizers, has made a significant contribution to the SOC sequestration over the past three decades (7, 27). However, negative effects of chemical N fertilizer inputs on SOC accumulation began to appear. The rate of SOC sequestration in Chinese croplands continuously increased with cumulative chemical N fertilizer inputs at below approximately 290 kg N ha−1 y−1 but decreased thereafter (Fig. S3A). The cumulative N fertilizer inputs were positively correlated with the rate of SOC sequestration in the Northwest, North, and Southwest China (Fig. S3 B–D). In contrast, N inputs were negatively related to rate of SOC change in the East China (Fig. S3E), raising questions about the sustainability of C sequestration depending on nutrient-enhanced productivity. Chemical N inputs in China are abnormally high (33). Excessive chemical N inputs may constrain SOC sequestration in soils through stimulating decomposition of cellulose-dominant crop residues (34), reducing C retention efficiency by favoring bacteria over fungi (35), and even limiting root growth by stimulating soil acidification (36). They also lead to environmental problems, such as greenhouse gas (N2O in particular) emissions and serious water pollution (33, 36). Chemical fertilizers have been key to the agricultural intensification in China. The pursuit of high yield and fertilizer-dependent grain yields led Chinese farmers to believe that “the more the chemical fertilizer, the higher the crop yield.” Thus, nutrient excesses are widespread and an optimal balance between cost and benefit is missed (23). Although N fertilizer will continue to be indispensable for China’s quest to produce sufficient food to meet its growing demands, grain yield per unit of fertilizer added in China has declined (37). Consequently, as an important component of agricultural intensification and increasing C sequestration, new strategies for rational use of N fertilizer in croplands of China need to be developed.

Implications and Perspectives.

We present an extensive examination of changes in SOC in China’s croplands from 1980 to 2011 and find that a significant SOC sequestration occurred during this period. Multiple factors contributed to this C sequestration, including the extremely low initial SOC content and increased residue inputs first due to enhancement of productivity by fertilizers and then policy-required straw return. Our results demonstrate that it is possible to promote economic benefits for farmers and environmental protection by enhancing SOC sequestration in croplands. However, this needs to incorporate economic and policy incentives. Although SOC is the core of soil fertility, it is a long-term process for the SOC build-up before farmers can harness significant economic benefits. Economic incentives should be established to compensate for the potential short-term losses experienced by farmers who adopt SOC-promoting practices.

Our analyses also identified challenges for future C sequestration in China’s croplands. One major factor for the residue-dependent C sequestration is that the plow layer of most crop fields is too shallow to allow SOC accumulation at depth. Tillage is still indispensable to most Chinese cropping systems because China’s priority is to maintain or increase yields but long-term no-tillage management may reduce yields. Additionally, many Chinese farmers do not have access to specialized planting equipment and chemical herbicides that are suitable for no-till systems. Tillage with animal-drawn implements was widespread in the early 1980s, and then the animal power was gradually replaced by low-power shallow tillage machineries, in particular rotovator with tilled depth usually less than 15 cm. Tillage practices facilitate crop residue incorporation and mixing of soil layers, leading to a more homogeneous C distribution across the entire tilled soil profile than the no-till systems (38). However, the long-term continuous shallow tillage and tractor wheel traffic in the field has made the plow layer shallower, and the plow pan thicker, harder, and closer to the surface, which critically limits the capacity of C preservation and crop productivity. Incorporating residues into the soil by tillage or leaving residues on the soil surface constitutes a dilemma for promoting C sequestration, as the former increases soil disturbance and decomposition of SOM, while the latter potentially limits soil C sequestration because most surface-placed residues decompose before reaching the mineral soil layer (39, 40). The intensity of Chinese cropping systems is very high and the time interval (window) between subsequent crops is very short. In the North China Plain, for example, the maize must be sown immediately once wheat is harvested. A large amount of straw/stover, if left on the soil surface, negatively affects germination of the subsequent crop plants and often induces diseases, prompting the farmers to burn the straw. Protection of organic C by the soil matrix is a primary mechanism for SOC stability (41). Conversion to deep tillage (a depth of 30 cm) after long-term shallow tillage (upper 10–12 cm; i.e., rotary tillage or harrow tillage) has been reported to improve soil carbon sequestration and crop yield in North China (42). While in the warm and humid South China, decomposition is fast and the shallow plow pan inhibits root penetration. Although residue incorporation by tillage may cause disturbance, soils in these regions contain high contents of iron and aluminum oxides and mineral clays, particularly in Oxisols, that can protect organic C from decomposition (43⇓–45). Therefore, rational tillage rotation with deep tillage after long-term shallow tillage (i.e., tilling to a depth of 30 cm once every 2–3 y) has been shown to be an effective practice to facilitate C sequestration across China (42, 46, 47). However, the extremely low amount of arable land (only about 0.1 ha per capita) and the small size of farms in China generate very limited net profits for each farm. Consequently, most farmers are unable to acquire high-cost and deep-till machineries needed for deep tilling. Therefore, one priority should be to enable farmers to have access to powerful deep-tillage machinery that can incorporate residues into deep soils. The recently proposed Rural Land Circulation policy in China is promising for further aggregation of small cropland patches for large-scale grain production so that integrated crop residue return policy and suitable tillage rotation can be applied at a reasonable cost.

The second challenge is that high N inputs may constrain future soil C accumulation, as shown by the negative relationship between N inputs and soil organic C in croplands of East China. Small farm sizes and high chemical inputs have reenforced a positive feedback loop in which requests for high yields requires high N inputs. High N inputs not only reduce root production but also reduce farmers’ enthusiasm for organic inputs. High chemical N inputs lead to soil acidity and even heavy metal toxicity, constituting the primary factor that leads to soil degradation in China (36). The exact mechanisms and their relative contributions to limiting soil C accumulation are not fully understood. The new research initiative of fertilizer reduction and pesticide reduction may help to understand these mechanisms and related processes.

For fostering both food production and potential C sequestration, the Chinese government also needs to modify policies to educate and award good management practices. The current incentives for residue return are most often “direct” subsidies, such as cash rewards for farmers (approximately $25–75 ha−1) and discount for straw-returning machine acquisition (20–30% purchase cost), depending on the economic levels of different regions. Such subsidy policy is largely supported by the quick development of China’s industrial economy. However, farmers’ enthusiasm may fade once such “direct” subsidy decreases or is ceased. One major challenge facing China’s agriculture is a severe labor shortage, with old people and women with low education levels being the primary rural labor force. Thus, long-term sustainable residue return practices that rely less on manual work would be essential. Consequently, the development of farmer-friendly (simple, effective, and time-saving) residue incorporation techniques and specialized tillage machineries with relatively low soil disturbance is also important. Moreover, livestock and poultry manure utilization, a key task in China’s “Fertilizer Use Zero-Growth Action Plan by 2020,” may benefit the potential C sequestration in Chinese croplands, but policies and supporting technologies for eliminating the potential risks of heavy metal pollutants due to manure applications also need to be developed.

Finally, our findings may provide some guidance for residue management for cropland C sequestration in many developing countries. Because of low productivity and residue removal for fuel or feeds, low organic C inputs are the primary factor limiting SOC accumulation in many developing countries (1, 3, 23). The substantial contributions of Chinese crop residue return policy to SOC sequestration also indicates that the solutions for China may potentially be applicable in other developing countries where similar experiences and challenges exist, particularly in Southeast Asia and South Asia. Lessons from the excessive N fertilizer uses in China can be learned (36). However, crop residue return may not be equally effective in sequestering C in different countries due to regional differences in biogeochemical, climatic, and socioeconomic conditions. Therefore, scientific knowledge and technologies, economic and policy incentives, and stakeholder’s active participation are inseparable components to realize the potential of global cropland C sequestration and agricultural sustainability.

Materials and Methods

Soil Data and Estimates of SOC Changes.

China conducted its second national soil survey across the country in 1980 and all of the major croplands that covered typical soil types and cropping systems were sampled. This nationwide effort generated the most comprehensive and detailed legacy data that are available so far for extracting historical information on soil properties of China (11). In 2011, we collected 4,060 topsoil (0–20 cm) samples in 58 counties across China (Fig. S1). These sample sites were chosen to: (i) match the 1980s sample sites as closely as possible, (ii) be on identical soil types (soil series) and topographic characteristics, and (iii) have the most typical cropping system around the sites. The soil samples were collected by using a process of composite sampling (SI Materials and Methods). The topsoil was sampled to a depth of 20 cm, because the thickness of topsoil in China is generally less than 30 cm and the upper 20 cm was consistently sampled in the second national soil survey in 1980 (6).

Data on SOM, bulk density, and rock fragment contents were obtained from the reports of the second national soil survey of China in 1980 and the resampling campaign in 2011, respectively. Identical methods were used for measuring SOM contents and total SOC stock for both sampling dates. Briefly, SOM contents (the SOM here means SOC × 1.724) were measured using the potassium dichromate oxidation with external heating method, and bulk densities were measured using the cutting ring method (48).

For each of the sampling sites, the SOC content is calculated by multiplying SOM by 0.58, and the SOC by volume (Mg C ha−1) was calculated by: Cfs × BDfs × Depth × (1 − RF)/10, where Cfs is the organic C content (fine soil, the part of the soil that passes through a 2-mm sieve, g kg−1), BDfs is the fine soil bulk density (g cm−3), Depth represents topsoil thickness in centimeters (20 cm in this study), and RF represents the volume fraction of rock fragments (>2 mm). The site-level SOC stocks were further aggregated to county and then to region scales using the area-weighted mean method. For each county, the mean SOC stock per soil type in the county was first calculated, and then the areas of each soil type recorded in the soil survey report of the county were used as weights to calculate the area-weighted mean of SOC stock for the county. For each region, the mean SOC stock per investigated county in the region and the soil areas of the investigated counties were used to derive the area-weighted mean SOC stock for the region.

The locations of the 1980s sample sites were mainly recorded by text descriptions in soil survey reports of each county because GPS was not available then. Thus, some errors in relocating the 2011 sample locations may have occurred. To obtain a robust estimate of SOC stock and its change, during the area-weighted mean calculation of SOC stocks, bootstraps with 10,000 times of repeat sampling were applied to derive the 95% confidence interval of the estimates (SI Materials and Methods), and the median of the estimates was used to represent the area-weighted mean SOC stock. It should be noted that the estimates of SOC change made in this paper did not consider effects of lateral C transport on soil C stocks.

C Input from Crop Resides (Root Plus Straw/Stover).

The C input into the soil was calculated based on the county-level major crop yields. For each county, the annual crop residue C input (Mg C ha−1) during 1980–2010 was estimated based on the sum of root and straw/stover C inputs of individual crops divided by the total cropland area at the corresponding year (SI Materials and Methods and Tables S3 and S4). Only staple grain crops (wheat, corn, paddy rice), oil plants (soybean, rapeseeds), and cotton for each of the 58 counties were considered as sources of crop residue C inputs, as yield data for these crops during the last 30 y were readily available from the agricultural census yearbook of each county.

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. Jingyun Fang and Prof. Gurui Yu for their suggestions in preparing this manuscript; and many other scientists, particularly Drs. Xiaozeng Han, Chunsheng Hu, Chengyi Zhao, Huifeng Hu, Nianpeng He, and Qiufeng Wang, for their help in data collection. This work was supported by the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant XDA05050000) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 41471177, 41401240, and 41571209).

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: xzshi{at}issas.ac.cn.
  • Author contributions: X.S. designed research; Y.Z., M.W., X.Z., Z.O., G.Z., B.H., S.Z., J.W., D.X., B.Z., D.Y., X.P., and S.X. performed research; Y.Z., M.W., S.H., and X.S. analyzed data; and Y.Z., M.W., S.H., and X.S. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1700292114/-/DCSupplemental.

Published under the PNAS license.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Lal R
    (2004) Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 304:1623–1627.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Schlesinger WH
    (1999) Carbon and agriculture—Carbon sequestration in soils. Science 284:2095.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Lal R
    (2001) World cropland soils as a source or sink for atmospheric carbon. Adv Agron 71:145–191.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    1. van Wesemael B, et al.
    (2010) Agricultural management explains historic changes in regional soil carbon stocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:14926–14930.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Shen JB, et al.
    (2013) Transforming agriculture in China: From solely high yield to both high yield and high resource use efficiency. Glob Food Secur 2:1–8.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Liao QL, et al.
    (2009) Increase in soil organic carbon stock over the last two decades in China’s Jiangsu Province. Glob Chang Biol 15:861–875.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Liao Y,
    2. Wu WL,
    3. Meng FQ,
    4. Smith P,
    5. Lal R
    (2015) Increase in soil organic carbon by agricultural intensification in northern China. Biogeosciences 12:1403–1413.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Li CS, et al.
    (2003) Modeling soil organic carbon change in croplands of China. Ecol Appl 13:327–336.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Pan GX,
    2. Xu XW,
    3. Smith P,
    4. Pan WN,
    5. Lal R
    (2010) An increase in topsoil SOC stock of China’s croplands between 1985 and 2006 revealed by soil monitoring. Agric Ecosyst Environ 136:133–138.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    1. Tang HJ,
    2. Qiu JJ,
    3. Van Ranst E,
    4. Li CS
    (2006) Estimations of soil organic carbon storage in cropland of China based on DNDC model. Geoderma 134:200–206.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Yan XY,
    2. Cai ZC,
    3. Wang SW,
    4. Smith P
    (2011) Direct measurement of soil organic carbon content change in the croplands of China. Glob Chang Biol 17:1487–1496.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Bellamy PH,
    2. Loveland PJ,
    3. Bradley RI,
    4. Lark RM,
    5. Kirk GJD
    (2005) Carbon losses from all soils across England and Wales 1978-2003. Nature 437:245–248.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Janssens IA, et al.
    (2003) Europe’s terrestrial biosphere absorbs 7 to 12% of European anthropogenic CO2 emissions. Science 300:1538–1542.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Sleutel S,
    2. De Neve S,
    3. Hofman G
    (2003) Estimates of carbon stock changes in Belgian cropland. Soil Use Manage 19:166–171.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. ↵
    1. Ciais P, et al.
    (2010) The European carbon balance. Part 2: Croplands. Glob Chang Biol 16:1409–1428.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Ogle SM,
    2. Breidt FJ,
    3. Eve MD,
    4. Paustian K
    (2003) Uncertainty in estimating land use and management impacts on soil organic carbon storage for US agricultural lands between 1982 and 1997. Glob Chang Biol 9:1521–1542.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Ogle SM, et al.
    (2010) Scale and uncertainty in modeled soil organic carbon stock changes for US croplands using a process-based model. Glob Chang Biol 16:810–822.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Knorr W,
    2. Prentice IC,
    3. House JI,
    4. Holland EA
    (2005) Long-term sensitivity of soil carbon turnover to warming. Nature 433:298–301.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Oades JM
    (1988) The retention of organic-matter in soils. Biogeochemistry 5:35–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. ↵
    1. Song GH,
    2. Li LQ,
    3. Pan GX,
    4. Zhang Q
    (2005) Topsoil organic carbon storage of China and its loss by cultivation. Biogeochemistry 74:47–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. ↵
    1. Zheng F,
    2. Wang B
    (2014) Soil erosion in the Loess Plateau region of China. Restoration and Development of the Degraded Loess Plateau, China, eds Tsunekawa A, Liu G, Yamanaka N, Du S (Springer, Tokyo), pp 77–92.
  22. ↵
    1. Shen S
    (1998) Chinese Soil Fertility (Chinese Agricultural Press, Beijing).
  23. ↵
    1. Vitousek PM, et al.
    (2009) Agriculture. Nutrient imbalances in agricultural development. Science 324:1519–1520.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Gao C,
    2. Sun B,
    3. Zhang TL
    (2006) Sustainable nutrient management in Chinese agriculture: Challenges and perspective. Pedosphere 16:253–263.
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. Qu C,
    2. Li B,
    3. Wu H,
    4. Giesy JP
    (2012) Controlling air pollution from straw burning in China calls for efficient recycling. Environ Sci Technol 46:7934–7936.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Gale F
    (2013) Growth and evolution in China’s agricultural support policies (US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, DC), ERR-153.
  27. ↵
    1. Huang Y,
    2. Sun WJ
    (2006) Changes in topsoil organic carbon of croplands in mainland China over the last two decades. Chin Sci Bull 51:1785–1803.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Lettens S,
    2. van Orshoven J,
    3. van Wesemael B,
    4. Muys B,
    5. Perrin D
    (2005) Soil organic carbon changes in landscape units of Belgium between 1960 and 2000 with reference to 1990. Glob Chang Biol 11:2128–2140.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. West TO, et al.
    (2008) Estimating regional changes in soil carbon with high spatial resolution. Soil Sci Soc Am J 72:285–294.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. ↵
    1. Lu F, et al.
    (2018) Effects of national ecological restoration projects on carbon sequestration in China from 2001 to 2010. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115:4039–4044.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Song X,
    2. Peng C,
    3. Zhou G,
    4. Jiang H,
    5. Wang W
    (2014) Chinese Grain for Green Program led to highly increased soil organic carbon levels: A meta-analysis. Sci Rep 4:4460.
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    1. Pittelkow CM, et al.
    (2015) When does no-till yield more? A global meta-analysis. Field Crops Res 183:156–168.
    OpenUrl
  33. ↵
    1. Liu X, et al.
    (2013) Enhanced nitrogen deposition over China. Nature 494:459–462.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Fog K
    (1988) The effect of added nitrogen on the rate of decomposition of organic-matter. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 63:433–462.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  35. ↵
    1. Six J,
    2. Frey SD,
    3. Thiet RK,
    4. Batten KM
    (2006) Bacterial and fungal contributions to carbon sequestration in agroecosystems. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:555–569.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  36. ↵
    1. Guo JH, et al.
    (2010) Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands. Science 327:1008–1010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Thomson AM,
    2. Izaurralde RC,
    3. Rosenberg NJ,
    4. He XX
    (2006) Climate change impacts on agriculture and soil carbon sequestration potential in the Huang-Hai Plain of China. Agric Ecosyst Environ 114:195–209.
    OpenUrl
  38. ↵
    1. Wingeyer AB, et al.
    (2012) Fall conservation deep tillage stabilizes maize residues into soil organic matter. Soil Sci Soc Am J 76:2154–2163.
    OpenUrl
  39. ↵
    1. Gale WJ,
    2. Cambardella CA
    (2000) Carbon dynamics of surface residue- and root-derived organic matter under simulated no-till. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:190–195.
    OpenUrl
  40. ↵
    1. Six J,
    2. Elliott ET,
    3. Paustian K
    (1999) Aggregate and soil organic matter dynamics under conventional and no-tillage systems. Soil Sci Soc Am J 63:1350–1358.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  41. ↵
    1. Schmidt MWI, et al.
    (2011) Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property. Nature 478:49–56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Tian SZ, et al.
    (2016) Crop yield and soil carbon responses to tillage method changes in North China. Soil Tillage Res 163:207–213.
    OpenUrl
  43. ↵
    1. Bayer C,
    2. Mielniczuk J,
    3. Martin-Neto L,
    4. Ernani PR
    (2002) Stocks and humification degree of organic matter fractions as affected by no-tillage on a subtropical soil. Plant Soil 238:133–140.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  44. ↵
    1. Denef K,
    2. Six J,
    3. Merckx R,
    4. Paustian K
    (2004) Carbon sequestration in microaggregates of no-tillage soils with different clay mineralogy. Soil Sci Soc Am J 68:1935–1944.
    OpenUrl
  45. ↵
    1. Paul S,
    2. Flessa H,
    3. Veldkamp E,
    4. Lopez-Ulloa M
    (2008) Stabilization of recent soil carbon in the humid tropics following land use changes: Evidence from aggregate fractionation and stable isotope analyses. Biogeochemistry 87:247–263.
    OpenUrl
  46. ↵
    1. Bai W, et al.
    (2016) The combination of subsoil and the incorporation of corn stover affect physicochemical properties of soil and corn yield in semi-arid China. Toxicol Environ Chem 98:561–570.
    OpenUrl
  47. ↵
    1. Xie YX, et al.
    (2015) Deep tillage improving physical and chemical properties of soil and increasing grain yield of winter wheat in lime concretion black soil farmland. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng 31:167–173.
    OpenUrl
  48. ↵
    1. Institute of Soil Science Chinese Academy of Sciences
    (1978) Soil Physics and Chemistry Analysis (Shanghai Science & Technology Press, Shanghai, China).
    1. Fang JY,
    2. Guo ZD,
    3. Piao SL,
    4. Chen AP
    (2007) Terrestrial vegetation carbon sinks in China, 1981-2000. Sci China Ser D 50:1341–1350.
    OpenUrl
    1. Smith P, et al.
    (2000) Meeting Europe’s climate change commitments: Quantitative estimates of the potential for carbon mitigation by agriculture. Glob Chang Biol 6:525–539.
    OpenUrl
    1. Guo YY,
    2. Gong P,
    3. Amundson R,
    4. Yu Q
    (2006) Analysis of factors controlling soil carbon in the conterminous United States. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:601–612.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Qin ZC,
    2. Huang Y,
    3. Zhuang QL
    (2013) Soil organic carbon sequestration potential of cropland in China. Global Biogeochem Cycles 27:711–722.
    OpenUrl
    1. Niu RF,
    2. Liu TF
    (1984) Agricultural Technical and Economic Handbook (Agricultural Press, Beijing).
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Economics- and policy-driven organic carbon input enhancement dominates soil organic carbon accumulation in Chinese croplands
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Policy-driven SOC sequestration in croplands
Yongcun Zhao, Meiyan Wang, Shuijin Hu, Xudong Zhang, Zhu Ouyang, Ganlin Zhang, Biao Huang, Shiwei Zhao, Jinshui Wu, Deti Xie, Bo Zhu, Dongsheng Yu, Xianzhang Pan, Shengxiang Xu, Xuezheng Shi
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Apr 2018, 115 (16) 4045-4050; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1700292114

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Policy-driven SOC sequestration in croplands
Yongcun Zhao, Meiyan Wang, Shuijin Hu, Xudong Zhang, Zhu Ouyang, Ganlin Zhang, Biao Huang, Shiwei Zhao, Jinshui Wu, Deti Xie, Bo Zhu, Dongsheng Yu, Xianzhang Pan, Shengxiang Xu, Xuezheng Shi
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Apr 2018, 115 (16) 4045-4050; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1700292114
Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 115 (16)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Article Classifications

  • Biological Sciences
  • Ecology

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results and Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Elli Theobald and Scott Freeman describe the benefits of active learning for underrepresented minority students.
Active learning in STEM
Elli Theobald and Scott Freeman describe the benefits of active learning for underrepresented minority students.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
A study suggests links between Arctic sea ice melting and altered Pacific El Niño activity.
Arctic sea ice and Pacific trade winds
A study suggests links between Arctic sea ice melting and altered Pacific El Niño activity.
Image credit: Pixabay/Taken.
Fires synchronize the bloom time of flowering in the prairie plant Echinacea angustifolia.
Fire and plant flowering and reproduction
Fires synchronize the bloom time of flowering in the prairie plant Echinacea angustifolia.
Image credit: Gretel Kiefer.
A study suggests at least two separate dispersals of Neanderthals into southern Siberia.
Neanderthal dispersal into Siberia
A study suggests at least two separate dispersals of Neanderthals into southern Siberia.
Image credit: Alexander Fedorchenko (Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia).
Teams are pursuing a dizzying array of therapeutic strategies to stymie COVID-19. It’s not yet clear which will work best.
News Feature: To counter the pandemic, clinicians bank on repurposed drugs
Teams are pursuing a dizzying array of therapeutic strategies to stymie COVID-19. It’s not yet clear which will work best.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Matej Kastelic.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive

PNAS Portals

  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Teaching Resources
  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2020 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490