Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
Research Article

Paleocene Ipomoea (Convolvulaceae) from India with implications for an East Gondwana origin of Convolvulaceae

Gaurav Srivastava, Rakesh C. Mehrotra, and View ORCID ProfileDavid L. Dilcher
  1. aBirbal Sahni Institute of Palaeosciences, Lucknow 226 007, India;
  2. bDepartment of Geology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS June 5, 2018 115 (23) 6028-6033; first published May 21, 2018; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1800626115
Gaurav Srivastava
aBirbal Sahni Institute of Palaeosciences, Lucknow 226 007, India;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rakesh C. Mehrotra
aBirbal Sahni Institute of Palaeosciences, Lucknow 226 007, India;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David L. Dilcher
bDepartment of Geology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for David L. Dilcher
  • For correspondence: dilcher@indiana.edu
  1. Contributed by David L. Dilcher, April 10, 2018 (sent for review January 17, 2018; reviewed by Nina Lucille Baghai-Riding and Gregory Retallack)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Significance

The origin of the worldwide-distributed morning glory family (Convolvulaceae) has been a matter of debate. The fossil record from late Eocene sediments of North America argues for a Laurasian origin that is in contrast to a molecular phylogenetic study that favors an East Gondwana origin. This report of fossil Ipomoea from the late Paleocene of India supports the current molecular phylogenetic conclusions of an East Gondwana origin for Convolvulaceae.

Abstract

The morning glory family, Convolvulaceae, is globally important in medicine and food crops. The family has worldwide distribution in a variety of habitats; however, its fossil record is very poorly documented. The current fossil record suggests an origin in North America, which is in contrast to molecular data that indicate an East Gondwana origin. We report Ipomoea leaves from the late Paleocene (Thanetian; 58.7–55.8 million years ago) of India, which was a part of East Gondwana during this time. This is the earliest fossil record for both the family Convolvulaceae and the order Solanales. This suggests that the sister families Convolvulaceae and Solanaceae diverged before the Eocene in Gondwana-derived continents. The evidence presented here supports the conclusion from molecular phylogenetic analysis of an East Gondwana origin of Convolvulaceae.

  • Convolvulaceae
  • sweet potato
  • Ipomoea
  • Paleocene
  • East Gondwana

Convolvulaceae, the morning glory family, consists of 57 genera and 1,880 species (1) with a worldwide distribution (SI Appendix, Fig. S1A) over a broad range of habitats. Most members of the family are perennial herbs, vines, or woody lianas, rarely annual herbs, shrubs, or trees that are endemic to the tropical regions (2), although weedy taxa from temperate regions are also known (e.g., Calystegia and Convolvulus). Traditionally, the family was placed in Solanales (3⇓–5), but Takhtajan (6) created a new order, Convolvulales, for it. Recent molecular systematics places the family in the order Solanales (7). Ipomoea batatas (sweet potato) of the Convolvulaceae family is the world’s second most important root crop (8). Despite a large number of species having worldwide distribution in varied environmental conditions, the fossil record of the family is very sporadic and is represented by a leaf from late Eocene sediments of the United States (9) and by pollen from Miocene sediment of Australia (10). Fossil records of its sister family Solanaceae are known from pollen and seeds from Eocene sediments of Colorado and of Lower Bagshot, United Kingdom (11). However, the recent discovery of Physalis fruit from the early Eocene (52.22 ± 0.22 Ma) sediments of Patagonia raises the possibility of a divergence in Gondwana (12).

Molecular phylogenetic studies suggest that the Convolvulaceae is monophyletic (13) and diverged from Solanaceae around 65 Ma (14), 85 Ma (15), 55.3 Ma (69.98–47.80 Ma) (16), or 66 Ma (17) in East Gondwana (18).

The Eocene fossil records of Convolvulaceae and Solanaceae from Laurasia, together with the Eocene Physalis fruit from Gondwana, raise an important question about the early divergence of both families and Solanales. Here we report fossil leaves of Ipomoea (Convolvulaceae) from the late Paleocene (Thanetian; ∼58.7–55.8 Ma) of Meghalaya (25° 26′ 47.4″ N), India (Fig. 1 A and B), which was located ∼7° S paleolatitude (19) (www.odsn.de) (SI Appendix, Fig. S1D). These fossil leaves represent the earliest record of Convolvulaceae and also Solanales, and they document the early divergence of Convolvulaceae and Solanaceae supporting the molecular inference of an East Gondwana origin of the Convolvulaceae (18).

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Physiographic map showing the fossil locality. (A) Physiographic map of India and adjoining areas showing the fossil locality (red box). (B) High-resolution physiographic map showing the fossil locality (red asterisk) (map source: www.marine-geo.org/tools/maps_grids.php).

Materials and Methods

A collection of 200 angiosperm leaves has been made from the Tura Formation exposed in Nangwalbibra (25° 26′ 47.4″ N; 90° 42′ 28.9″ E), East Garo Hills District, Meghalaya (Fig. 1 A and B). Here we describe a fossil leaf morphotype based upon 17 specimens, 2 of which have counterparts. The specimens are impressions/compressions. They were prepared with the help of a fine chisel and hammer and then photographed in natural low-angled light using a 10-megapixel digital camera (Canon SX110). An attempt was made to extract cuticle with no success. The terminology used in describing the fossil leaves is based on Dilcher (20) and Ellis et al. (21). The distance between adjacent secondary veins was measured, and a range (minimum–maximum) was taken while describing the fossil leaves. The fossils are housed in the museum of the Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeosciences, Lucknow, India. Similar extant leaves were examined at the herbaria of the National Botanical Research Institute, Lucknow, India, and the Forest Research Institute (FRI), Dehradun, India. In addition, the website of the Royal Botanical Gardens, Kew (apps.kew.org/herbcat/navigator.do; accessed on August 18, 2014 and January 15, 2017) was also consulted.

Results and Discussion

Systematics.

Order.

Solanales Juss. ex Bercht. et J. Presl.

Family.

Convolvulaceae Juss.

Genus.

Ipomoea L.

Species.

Ipomoea meghalayensis sp. nov., Srivastava, Mehrotra, and Dilcher.

Holotype.

Specimen no. Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeosciences (BSIP) 40571 (Figs. 2A and 3D).

Fig. 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 2.

I. meghalayensis sp. nov. (A) Leaf showing elliptic shape, primary vein (white arrow), secondary veins (yellow arrows), percurrent tertiary vein (red arrow), intersecondary vein (green arrow), cordate base, and attenuate apex (blue arrow) (specimen no. BSIP 40571). (B) Fossil leaf showing shape, size, lobes of cordate base (yellow arrows), and insect damage (white dotted line with blue arrows); lamina showing shoulder portion (black arrows) (specimen no. BSIP 40572). (C) Enlarged portion (B, yellow box) of lamina showing glandular dots (yellow arrows). (D) Leaf showing elliptic shape, size, venation pattern, cordate base (blue arrows), recurved leaf lamina joining petiole (yellow arrows), and insect activity (red arrow) (specimen no. BSIP 40573A). (E) Leaf showing shape, venation pattern, and rounded basal lobe (black arrows) (specimen no. BSIP 40573B). (F) Leaf showing shape, size, venation pattern, and insect feeding (yellow arrows with red dotted line) (specimen no. BSIP 40574).

Fig. 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 3.

I. meghalayensis sp. nov. (A and B) Part and counterpart of the fossil leaves showing shape, recurved lamina joining petiole (yellow arrow), lobed base (red arrow), and short petiole (blue arrows) (specimen nos. BSIP 40584 and 40585). (C) Fossil leaf in reflected natural light showing morphological details (specimen no. BSIP 40586). (D) Enlarged portion of the fossil leaf (Fig. 2A; specimen no. BSIP 40571) showing primary vein (red arrow), secondary veins (yellow arrows), percurrent tertiary veins (white arrows), and an intersecondary vein joining the midvein with the secondary vein (black arrows).

Paratypes.

Specimen nos. BSIP 40572, 40573A, 40573B, 40574, and 40575–40586 (Figs. 2 B–F, 3 A–C, 4 A–D, and 5 A–E).

Fig. 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 4.

I. meghalayensis sp. nov. (A) Fossil leaf showing shape, size, thick midvein with insect mine (white arrows), and lots of insect damage (broken white line with yellow arrows) (specimen no. BSIP 40580). (B) Fossil leaf showing shape, size, and venation pattern (specimen no. BSIP 40581). (C) Fossil leaf showing shape, size, venation pattern, insect damage on the lamina (black arrows), and petiole bearing five ribs/veins (white arrow) (specimen no. BSIP 40582). (D) Fossil leaf in natural reflected light showing shape, size, and venation pattern (specimen no. BSIP 40583).

Fig. 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 5.

I. meghalayensis sp. nov. (A) Fossil leaf showing characteristic shape, size, venation pattern, and displaced petiole bending down into the sediments (yellow arrows) (specimen no. BSIP 40575). (B) Fossil leaf showing shape, size, venation pattern, and insect feeding at margin of lamina (black arrows) (specimen no. BSIP 40576). (C–E) Fossil leaf showing shape, size, venation pattern and insect damage (black arrows) (specimen nos. BSIP 40577, 40578, and 40579).

Repository.

Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeosciences, Lucknow.

Type locality.

Nangwalbibra, Meghalaya, India (Fig. 1).

Horizon.

Tura Formation.

Age.

Late Paleocene (Thanetian; ∼58.7–55.8 Ma).

Etymology.

The specific epithet is named for the locality.

Description.

Lamina symmetrical, elliptic to ovate (widest at base or proximal 1/fourth); apex attenuate, arising somewhat abruptly from a broader leaf blade, rounded at the top (SI Appendix, Fig. S2A); base is deeply cordate, recurved leaf lamina joining the petiole (Figs. 2D and 5 A and B and SI Appendix, Fig. S2D). The basal lobes are rounded; margin entire, slightly wavy; midvein slightly curving, tapering, multistranded, and stout; leaf texture thin, appearing rough; petiole moderate to stout, short (0.03–1.78 mm); venation pinnate, eucamptodromous; secondary veins slightly more acute toward apex, angle of divergence often 57° to 67°, sometimes decurrent to midvein (Fig. 3D), course straight and arching upward at about two-thirds of the distance to the margin, forming loops close to the margin after joining with superadjacent secondary veins, two basal secondary veins at broad angles, each associated with a smaller more basal vein feeding the lobes (SI Appendix, Fig. S2B); tertiary veins percurrent (Fig. 3D and SI Appendix, Fig. S2C); one or two intersecondary veins may be present (Fig. 3D), sometimes joining the midvein with the secondary vein (Fig. 3D); glandular dots numerous (Fig. 2C and SI Appendix, Fig. S3 A–C).

Affinities.

The characteristic features of the fossil leaves—such as their elliptic-to-ovate shape, attenuate apex, deeply cordate base with recurved leaf lamina joining the petiole, basal lobes, entire margin, pinnate, eucamptodromous venation, secondary veins slightly more acute toward apex, two basal secondary veins at broad angles feeding the lobes, percurrent tertiary veins, presence of intersecondary veins, and numerous glandular dots—exactly correlate with the same characters found in Ipomoea, therefore suggesting close affinity of the fossil with Ipomoea of the family Convolvulaceae. A large number of herbarium sheets of Argyreia Lour., Calystegia R. Br., Convolvulus L., Ipomoea L., Merremia Dennst. ex Endl., Odonellia Robertson, and Operculina Silva Manso of the Convolvulaceae were studied at the FRI and the National Botanical Research Institute, Lucknow, along with images of herbarium sheets from the website of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

The species of Argyreia, Calystegia, Convolvulus, Odonellia, and Operculina can be differentiated from the fossil on the basis of a combination of characters such as apex, length–width ratio, angle of divergence of secondary veins, distance between adjacent secondary veins, presence or absence of intersecondary veins, and reticulate tertiary veins (SI Appendix, Table S1). Modern species of Merremia such as M. dissecta Hallier f., M. gemella Hallier f., M. hederacea Hallier f., M. peltata Merr., and M. tuberosa Rendle show superficial resemblance to our fossil, but the presence of an acute and rounded leaf base, moderately wide acute angle of divergence of secondary veins, and reticulate tertiary veins differentiate the modern species from the fossil (SI Appendix, Table S1).

A large number of modern species of Ipomoea were compared in detail with the fossil leaves, and a comparative chart of them is presented in SI Appendix, Table S1. Our fossil shows close resemblance with the modern leaves of Ipomoea eriocarpa R. Br. in the characters such as attenuate apex, deeply cordate base, pinnate eucamptodromous venation, narrow-to-moderate angle of divergence of secondary veins, distance between adjacent secondary veins, presence of intersecondary veins, and percurrent tertiary veins (Fig. 6 A–D). The petiole is short in the fossil, while in the modern leaf of I. eriocarpa the petiole length varies from short to long (0.6–6.5 cm) (SI Appendix, Fig. S4 A and B). There are also several other species of Ipomoea where length of the petiole varies from 2 mm to 14 cm (2). Secretory structures have been reported in Ipomoea species in the form of glandular trichomes (22⇓⇓–25), laticiferous canals and idioblasts (24, 26), floral nectaries on sepals (27), and extrafloral nectarines on petioles (24, 28⇓⇓–31). Glandular dots are present on the surface of I. eriocarpa leaves (SI Appendix, Fig. S5B). The glandular trichomes reported by Kuster et al. (25) in the Ipomoea pes-caprae and Ipomoea imperati are very similar to those of our fossil leaves (SI Appendix, Fig. S3 A–C).

Fig. 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 6.

Modern leaves of I. eriocarpa. (A) I. eriocarpa showing shape, size, and venation pattern (Herbarium sheet no. FRI 24091). (Scale bar, 1 cm.) (B) Enlarged upper portion of the modern leaf showing primary vein (red arrow), secondary veins (yellow arrows), and tertiary veins (white arrows). (C) Enlarged middle portion of the leaf showing primary vein (black arrow), secondary veins (yellow arrows), recurved tertiary vein (white arrow), and eucamptodromous venation (blue arrows). (D) Enlarged basal portion of the leaf showing recurved lamina (white arrow) and basal lobe (yellow arrows).

In addition to Convolvulaceae, the fossil also shows some similarity with Echinodorus grandiflorus Micheli of the Alismataceae, Centella asiatica Urb. of the Apiaceae, Arum dioscoroides Sm. of the Araceae, Dioscorea glandulosa Ayala of the Dioscoreaceae, Arcangelisia flava (L.) Merr., Cissampelos andromorpha DC., Cocculus carolinus (L.) DC., Odontocarya floribunda Diels, Odontocarya tamoides (DC.) Miers, Pericampylus glaucus (Lam.) Merr., Sarcopetalum harveyanum F. Muell., Tinospora dentata Diels, T. merrilliana Diels of the family Menispermaceae, Piper wichmannii (C. DC.) Lebot of the Piperaceae, and Smilax fluminensis Steud. of the Smilacaceae.

The taxa from the families such as Alismataceae, Dioscoreaceae, Piperaceae, and Smilacaceae can be differentiated from the fossil in having campylodromous venation. Centella asiatica of the Apiaceae has festooned brochidodromous venation, which is in contrast to the fossil. In Araceae, the presence of a sagittate base and reticulate tertiary venation are major differences from our fossil. The genera from the family Menispermaceae have acrodromous to actinodromous venation in contrast to the fossil. However, Tinospora dentata shows superficial similarity, but the serrate margin clearly differentiates it from our fossil.

As far as the authors are aware, there is only one fossil (fruit) record of Ipomoea known from the Neogene sediments of India (32). Therefore, a new species—i.e., I. meghalayensis sp. nov., Gaurav Srivastava, R. C. Mehrotra, and D. L. Dilcher—is proposed for the fossil reported here.

Evolution and Dispersal of the Convolvulaceae and Ipomoea.

According to Wikström et al. (14), the sister families Convolvulaceae and Solanaceae diverged during the Maastrichtian (∼65.5 ± 0.5 Ma) while Bremer et al. (15) suggested their divergence during the Santonian (∼85 Ma). This is also the time when social insects were first found and were important pollinators for these families (33). However, Eserman et al. (16) proposed a mean age of about 55.3 Ma (69.98–47.80 Ma) for Convolvulaceae and Solanaceae and suggest a mean age for the divergence of the tribe Ipomoeeae is about 35 Ma (49.64–21 Ma), which is too young in comparison with the fossil record presented here. Moreover, the recent molecular data suggest that Convolvulaceae and Solanaceae diverged at ∼66 Ma (17). Olmstead (18) has inferred that Solanales represents the best example of vicariance following the Gondwanan breakup, which resulted in emergence of Solanaceae in South America; Hydroliaceae, Sphenocleaceae, and Montiniaceae in Africa; and Convolvulaceae in East Gondwana.

In a comprehensive review of the fossil records of Asteridae, Martínez-Millán (11) has suggested that in Convolvulaceae only two fossils, namely Convolvulites orichitus (leaf) MacGinitie (9) from the late Eocene of Colorado and Tricolpites trioblatus (pollen) (10) from the Early–Middle Miocene of Lake Hydra, Australia, are reliable. However, in the sister family Solanaceae, Martínez-Millán accepted Datura cf. D. discolor (pollen) from the late Eocene of Colorado (34) and seeds of Solanispermum reniforme and Solanum arnense from the Eocene of Lower Bagshot, United Kingdom (35) as reliable fossil records (11). These fossil records suggest that both families were well established by the Eocene in Laurasia. However, the recent discovery of earliest fossil fruit of Solanaceae (Physalis infinemundi) from early Eocene sediments of Patagonia suggests that the families Convolvulaceae and Solanaceae probably diverged before the Eocene in Gondwana-derived continents. The discovery of leaves similar to Ipomoea in the late Paleocene sediments (Thanetian; 58.7–55.8 Ma) of India represents the earliest record, not only of the family Convolvulaceae, but also of the order Solanales (11). It also suggests that Convolvulaceae and Solanaceae diverged before the Eocene in the Gondwana-derived continents, a theory already proposed from the molecular phylogenetic analysis (18). In light of the above facts, the fossil leaves reported here suggest an East Gondwana origin of the family Convolvulaceae.

The fossil records of Convolvulaceae from the Eocene of Colorado, the Miocene of Australia, and the Neogene of India (SI Appendix, Fig. S1 A–D), together with the Paleocene Indian fossil described above, suggest that the family had an early disjunct distribution during the Cenozoic. More fossil records are needed to hypothesize the dispersal pathway(s) of the family.

Ipomoea has a disjunct distribution today, and it is found in all tropical and subtropical areas of the world (SI Appendix, Fig. S1A). Phylogeographic analysis of Miryeganeh et al. (36, 37) based on molecular data for I. pes-caprae suggest that the species has achieved long-distance dispersal, and they have also suggested an Old World origin for the species.

Geological Details.

The Tura Formation overlies unconformably the Precambrian Gneiss complex at the junction of the Nangal stream and the Simsang River near Nangwalbibra where the plant-bearing beds are exposed. The formation is divided into lower, middle, and upper members (SI Appendix, Table S2). The lower member is about 16–20 m thick and consists of massive sandstones with pebbly interbeds, while the middle member is basically argillaceous and composed of lithomargic clays and argillaceous sandstones, along with coal seams. The upper member is again arenaceous with a few pebble-bearing layers. The Tura Formation is overlain by the Siju Limestone (early Eocene), which consists of intercalations of fossiliferous beds of marls, limestones, silts, and shales. The Siju Limestone is overlain by the Kopili Formation (late Eocene), which is composed of siltstones and shales (38⇓⇓–41). The generalized lithostratigraphic succession is given in SI Appendix, Table S2. In the Tura Formation, the plant megafossils are found in a grayish-white-to-buff claystone bed of the middle member, ranging from 3.0 to 3.66 m in thickness. It overlies a 1.83- to 2.13-m thick coal seam and underlies a 1.22- to 1.52-m thick white coarse-grained sandstone (42) (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 7.

Stratigraphy of the studied section at Nangwalbibra showing the strata from where the fossil leaves were collected (42).

Saxena et al. (43) conducted a detailed palynofloral work from the Tura Formation near Nangwalbibra and compared the assemblage with the already known palynofloral assemblages from the Cherra and Lakadong Sandstone Formations of the Khasi Hills (44⇓–46), the Therria Formation of Jaintia Hills, Meghalaya (47), and the Mikir Formation of the North Cachar Hills, Assam (48) and suggested a taxonomic uniformity among them. Since all these formations are from the Paleocene age, Saxena et al. (43) suggested the same age for the Tura Formation of Garo Hills. Based on characteristic pollen taxa such as Dandotiaspora telonata, Dandotiaspora pseudoreticulata, Dandotiaspora plicata, Polycolpites speciosus, Polycolpites cooksoniae, Lycopodiumsporites paleocenicus, Proxapertites microreticulatus, Matanomadhiasulcites maximus, Retitribrevicolporites matanomadhensis, Tricolpites levis, Neocouperipollis rarispinosus, and Neocouperipollis brevispinosus described earlier by Sah and Singh (49) from Nangwalbibra, Ambwani and Kar (50) suggested a more specific age of the late Paleocene for the Tura Formation. Monga et al. (51) also suggested the same age on the basis of palynoassemblage recorded from the present fossil locality.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Directors of the Forest Research Institute and the National Botanical Research Institute for their permission to consult the herbarium; the Director of the Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeosciences for providing necessary facilities and permission to carry out this work; and Prof. Ron Blakey of Colorado for technical advice.

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: dilcher{at}indiana.edu.
  • Author contributions: G.S., R.C.M., and D.L.D. designed research; G.S., R.C.M., and D.L.D. performed research; G.S. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; G.S., R.C.M., and D.L.D. analyzed data; and G.S. and D.L.D. wrote the paper.

  • Reviewers: N.L.B.-R., Delta State University; and G.R., University of Oregon.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1800626115/-/DCSupplemental.

Published under the PNAS license.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Stevens PF
    (2001) Angiosperm Phylogeny Website, Version 12, July 2012 (more or less continuously updated). Available at www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/. Accessed October 10, 2014 and January 15, 2017.
  2. ↵
    1. Mathews P,
    2. Sivadasan M
    1. Austin DF
    (1998) Parallel and convergent evolution in the Convolvulaceae. Biodiversity and Taxonomy of Tropical Flowering Plants, eds Mathews P, Sivadasan M (Mentor Books, Calicut, India), pp 201–234.
  3. ↵
    1. Cronquist A
    (1988) The Evolution and Classification of Flowering Plants (New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York), 2nd Ed.
  4. ↵
    1. Tann K,
    2. Mill RR,
    3. Elias TS
    1. Dahlgren G
    (1989) The last Dahlgrenogram: System of classification of the dicotyledons. Plant Taxonomy, Phytogeography, and Related Subjects, eds Tann K, Mill RR, Elias TS (Edinburgh Univ Press, Edinburgh), pp 249–260.
  5. ↵
    1. Thorne RF
    (1992) An updated phylogenetic classification of flowering plants. Aliso 13:365–389.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Takhtajan A
    (1997) Diversity and Classification of Flowering Plants (Columbia Univ Press, New York).
  7. ↵
    1. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group IV
    (2016) An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV. Bot J Linn Soc 181:1–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. ↵
    1. Simpson BB,
    2. Ogorzaly MC
    (1995) Economic Botany: Plants in Our World (McGraw-Hill, New York), 2nd Ed.
  9. ↵
    1. MacGinitie HD
    (1953) Fossil plants of the Florissant Beds, Colorado. Carnegie Instit Wash Contri Paleontol 559:1–198.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Martin HA
    (2000) Re-assignment of the affinities of the fossil pollen type Tricolpites trioblatus Mildenhall and Pocknall to Wilsonia (Convolvulaceae) and a reassessment of the ecological interpretations. Rev Palaeobot Palynol 111:237–251.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. ↵
    1. Martínez-Millán M
    (2010) Fossil record and age of the Asteridae. Bot Rev 76:83–135.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    1. Wilf P,
    2. Carvalho MR,
    3. Gandolfo MA,
    4. Cúneo NR
    (2017) Eocene lantern fruits from Gondwanan Patagonia and the early origins of Solanaceae. Science 355:71–75.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Stefanović S,
    2. Krueger L,
    3. Olmstead RG
    (2002) Monophyly of the Convolvulaceae and circumscription of their major lineages based on DNA sequences of multiple chloroplast loci. Am J Bot 89:1510–1522.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Wikström N,
    2. Savolainen V,
    3. Chase MW
    (2001) Evolution of the angiosperms: Calibrating the family tree. Proc Biol Sci 268:2211–2220.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Bremer K,
    2. Friis EM,
    3. Bremer B
    (2004) Molecular phylogenetic dating of asterid flowering plants shows early Cretaceous diversification. Syst Biol 53:496–505.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Eserman LA,
    2. Tiley GP,
    3. Jarret RL,
    4. Leebens-Mack JH,
    5. Miller RE
    (2014) Phylogenetics and diversification of morning glories (tribe Ipomoeeae, Convolvulaceae) based on whole plastome sequences. Am J Bot 101:92–103.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Magallón S,
    2. Gómez-Acevedo S,
    3. Sánchez-Reyes LL,
    4. Hernández-Hernández T
    (2015) A metacalibrated time-tree documents the early rise of flowering plant phylogenetic diversity. New Phytol 207:437–453.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Olmstead RG
    (2013) Phylogeny and biogeography in Solanaceae, Verbenaceae and Bignoniaceae: A comparison of continental and intercontinental diversification patterns. Bot J Linn Soc 171:80–102.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  19. ↵
    1. Scotese CR
    (2001) Earth System History Geographic Information System, Version 02b (PALEOMAP Project, Arlington, TX).
  20. ↵
    1. Dilcher DL
    (1974) Approaches to the identification of angiosperm leaf remains. Bot Rev 40:1–157.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  21. ↵
    1. Ellis B, et al.
    (2009) Manual of Leaf Architecture (Cornell Univ Press, Ithaca, NY).
  22. ↵
    1. Silva LC,
    2. Azevedo AA
    (2007) Anatomia de plantas de restinga e sua aplicação como ferramenta para a bioindicação. Ecossistemas costeiros do Espírito Santo: Conservação e restauração [Anatomy of restinga plants and their application as tool for bioindication. Coastal ecosystems of Espirito Santo: Conservation and restoration], eds Menezes LFT, Pires FR, Pereira OJ (EDUFES, Vitória, Brazil), pp 213–233. Portuguese.
  23. ↵
    1. Arruda RCO,
    2. Viglio NSF,
    3. Barros AAM
    (2009) Anatomia foliar de halófitas e psamófilas reptantes ocorrentes na Restinga de Ipitangas Saquarema Rio de Janeiro Brasil [Leaf anatomy of halophytes and psamophiles crawling occurred in Restinga de Ipitangas Saquarema Rio de Janeiro Brazil]. Rodriguésia 60:333–352. Portuguese.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. Martins FM,
    2. Lima JF,
    3. Mascarenhas AAS,
    4. Macedo TP
    (2012) Secretory structures of Ipomoea asarifolia: Anatomy and histochemistry. Braz J Pharmacog 22:13–20.
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. Kuster VC,
    2. da Silva LC,
    3. Meira RMSA,
    4. Azevedo AA
    (2016) Glandular trichomes and laticifers in leaves of Ipomoea pes-caprae and I. imperati (Convolvulaceae) from coastal Restinga formation: Structure and histochemistry. Braz J Bot 39:1117–1125.
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    1. Metcalfe C,
    2. Chalk L
    (1957) Anatomy of the Dicotyledons (Clarendon Press, Oxford).
  27. ↵
    1. Keeler KH,
    2. Kaul R
    (1984) Distribution of defense nectaries in Ipomoea (Convolvulaceae). Am J Bot 71:1364–1372.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  28. ↵
    1. Beckmann RL,
    2. Stucky JM
    (1981) Extrafloral nectaries and plant guarding in Ipomoea pandurata (L.) G. F. W. Mey. (Convolvulaceae). Am J Bot 68:72–79.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. Keeler KH
    (1977) The extrafloral nectaries of Ipomoea carnea (Convolvulaceae). Am J Bot 64:1182–1188.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. ↵
    1. Keeler KH
    (1980) The extrafloral nectaries of Ipomoea leptophylla (Convolvulaceae). Am J Bot 67:216–222.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. ↵
    1. Keeler KH,
    2. Kaul R
    (1979) Morphology and distribution of petiolar nectaries in Ipomoea (Convolvulaceae). Am J Bot 88:946–952.
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    1. Awasthi N,
    2. Lakhanpal RN
    (1990) Addition to Neogene florule from near Bhikhnathoree, West Champaran District, Bihar. Palaeobotanist 37:278–283.
    OpenUrl
  33. ↵
    1. Patiny S
    1. Hu S,
    2. Dilcher DL,
    3. Taylor DW
    (2012) Pollen evidence for the pollination biology of early flowering plants. Evolution of Plant-Pollinator Relationships, ed Patiny S (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK), pp 165–236.
  34. ↵
    1. Leopold EB,
    2. Clay-Poole ST
    (2001) Florissant leaf and pollen floras of Colorado compared: Climatic implications. Fossil Flora and Stratigraphy of the Florissant Formation, Colorado, Proceedings of the Denver Museum of Natural History 4, eds Evanoff E, Wodzicki G, Kathryn M, Johnson KR (Denver Museum of Nature & Science, Denver), pp 17–69.
  35. ↵
    1. Chandler MEJ
    (1962) The Lower Tertiary Floras of Southern England (British Museum, London), Vol 2.
  36. ↵
    1. Miryeganeh M,
    2. Takayama K,
    3. Tateishi Y,
    4. Kajita T
    (2014) Long-distance dispersal by sea-drifted seeds has maintained the global distribution of Ipomoea pes-caprae subsp. brasiliensis (Convolvulaceae). PLoS One 9:e91836.
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    1. Miryeganeh M,
    2. Takayma K,
    3. Tateishi Y,
    4. Kajita T
    (2014) Geographic structure of true pantropical plant with sea-drifted seeds, Ipomoea pescaprae (Convolvulaceae), revealed by nuclear marker. Shokubutsu Kenkyu Zasshi 89:65–75.
    OpenUrl
  38. ↵
    1. Biswas B
    (1962) Stratigraphy of the Mahadeo, Langpar, Cherra and Tura formations, Assam, India. Bull Geol Min Metal Soc India 25:1–48.
    OpenUrl
  39. ↵
    1. Surange KR,
    2. Lakhanpal RN,
    3. Bhardwaj DC
    1. Bakshi SK
    (1974) Significant pollen taxa in the statigraphical analysis of the Tertiary sediments of Assam. Aspects and Appraisal of Indian Palaeobotany, eds Surange KR, Lakhanpal RN, Bhardwaj DC (Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeobotany, Lucknow, India), pp 502–515.
  40. ↵
    1. Raja Rao CS
    (1981) Coalfields of India: Coalfields of northeastern India. Bull Geol Surv India Ser A 45:1–76.
    OpenUrl
  41. ↵
    1. Anonymous
    (1989) Recent advances in the study of Tertiary stratigraphy of North Eastern India: A critical resume. NER Geol Surv India Spec Pub 23:1–22.
    OpenUrl
  42. ↵
    1. Bhattacharyya B
    (1983) Fossil plants from the Tura formation (Eocene) in the Garo Hills, Meghalaya. Indian J Earth Sci 10:1–10.
    OpenUrl
  43. ↵
    1. Saxena RK,
    2. Tripathi SKM,
    3. Prasad V
    (1996) Palynofloral investigation of the Tura formation (Palaeocene) in Nongwal Bibra area, East Garo Hills, Meghalaya. Geophytology 26:19–31.
    OpenUrl
  44. ↵
    1. Dutta SK,
    2. Sah SCD
    (1970) Palynostratigraphy of the Tertiary sedimentary formations of Assam: 5. Stratigraphy and palynology of South Shillong Plateau. Palaeontographica B 11:1–72.
    OpenUrl
  45. ↵
    1. Sah SCD,
    2. Dutta SK
    (1974) Palynostratigraphy of sedimentary formations of Assam: 3. Biostratigraphic zonation of Cherra formation of South Shillong Plateau. Palaeobotanist 21:42–47.
    OpenUrl
  46. ↵
    1. Kar RK,
    2. Kumar M
    (1986) Palaeocene palynostratigraphy of Meghalaya, India. Pollen Spores 28:177–218.
    OpenUrl
  47. ↵
    1. Tiwari RS,
    2. Awasthi N,
    3. Srivastava SC,
    4. Singh HP,
    5. Sharma BB
    1. Tripathi SKM,
    2. Singh HP
    (1984) Palynostratigraphical zonation and correlation of the Jowai-Sonapur Road Section (Paleocene-Eocene), Meghalaya, India. Proceeding of the Sixth Indian Geophytological Conference Lucknow, eds Tiwari RS, Awasthi N, Srivastava SC, Singh HP, Sharma BB (Special Publication of the Palaeobotanical Society, Lucknow, India), pp 316–328.
  48. ↵
    1. Mehrotra NC
    (1981) Palynological correlation of Mikir formation with lower Palaeogene sediments of Shillong Plateau. Geophytology 11:133–142.
    OpenUrl
  49. ↵
    1. Sah SCD
    1. Sah SCD,
    2. Singh RY
    (1974) Palynological biostratigraphy of the Tura formation in the type area. Symposium on Stratigraphical Palynology, Special Publication 3, ed Sah SCD (Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeobotany, Lucknow, India), pp 76–98.
  50. ↵
    1. Ambwani K,
    2. Kar RK
    (2000) Occurrence of Anonidium-like pollen in the Tura formation (Palaeocene) of Meghalaya, India. Palaeobotanist 49:219–223.
    OpenUrl
  51. ↵
    1. Monga P,
    2. Srivastava G,
    3. Kumar M,
    4. Mehrotra RC
    (2014) Further palynological investigation of coaliferous sequences of Tura formation of Nangwalbibra, East Garo Hillls, Meghalaya: Inferences on palaeovegetation and palaeoclimate. Palaeobotanist 63:79–85.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Paleocene Ipomoea (Convolvulaceae) from India with implications for an East Gondwana origin of Convolvulaceae
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Paleocene Ipomoea (Convolvulaceae) from India with implications for an East Gondwana origin of Convolvulaceae
Gaurav Srivastava, Rakesh C. Mehrotra, David L. Dilcher
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Jun 2018, 115 (23) 6028-6033; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1800626115

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Paleocene Ipomoea (Convolvulaceae) from India with implications for an East Gondwana origin of Convolvulaceae
Gaurav Srivastava, Rakesh C. Mehrotra, David L. Dilcher
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Jun 2018, 115 (23) 6028-6033; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1800626115
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Article Classifications

  • Biological Sciences
  • Evolution
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 115 (23)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results and Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Surgeons hands during surgery
Inner Workings: Advances in infectious disease treatment promise to expand the pool of donor organs
Despite myriad challenges, clinicians see room for progress.
Image credit: Shutterstock/David Tadevosian.
Setting sun over a sun-baked dirt landscape
Core Concept: Popular integrated assessment climate policy models have key caveats
Better explicating the strengths and shortcomings of these models will help refine projections and improve transparency in the years ahead.
Image credit: Witsawat.S.
Double helix
Journal Club: Noncoding DNA shown to underlie function, cause limb malformations
Using CRISPR, researchers showed that a region some used to label “junk DNA” has a major role in a rare genetic disorder.
Image credit: Nathan Devery.
Steamboat Geyser eruption.
Eruption of Steamboat Geyser
Mara Reed and Michael Manga explore why Yellowstone's Steamboat Geyser resumed erupting in 2018.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Birds nestling on tree branches
Parent–offspring conflict in songbird fledging
Some songbird parents might improve their own fitness by manipulating their offspring into leaving the nest early, at the cost of fledgling survival, a study finds.
Image credit: Gil Eckrich (photographer).

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490