Skip to main content
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Latest Articles
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • Archive
  • Front Matter
  • News
    • For the Press
    • Highlights from Latest Articles
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Purpose and Scope
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • For Reviewers
    • Author FAQ

New Research In

Physical Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Applied Mathematics
  • Applied Physical Sciences
  • Astronomy
  • Computer Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Engineering
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Mathematics
  • Statistics

Social Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Economic Sciences
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Political Sciences
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Social Sciences

Biological Sciences

Featured Portals

  • Sustainability Science

Articles by Topic

  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Anthropology
  • Applied Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry
  • Biophysics and Computational Biology
  • Cell Biology
  • Developmental Biology
  • Ecology
  • Environmental Sciences
  • Evolution
  • Genetics
  • Immunology and Inflammation
  • Medical Sciences
  • Microbiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Pharmacology
  • Physiology
  • Plant Biology
  • Population Biology
  • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
  • Sustainability Science
  • Systems Biology

YES1 amplification is a mechanism of acquired resistance to EGFR inhibitors identified by transposon mutagenesis and clinical genomics

Pang-Dian Fan, Giuseppe Narzisi, Anitha D. Jayaprakash, Elisa Venturini, Nicolas Robine, Peter Smibert, Soren Germer, Helena A. Yu, Emmet J. Jordan, Paul K. Paik, Yelena Y. Janjigian, Jamie E. Chaft, Lu Wang, Achim A. Jungbluth, Sumit Middha, Lee Spraggon, Huan Qiao, Christine M. Lovly, Mark G. Kris, Gregory J. Riely, Katerina Politi, Harold Varmus, and Marc Ladanyi
PNAS June 26, 2018 115 (26) E6030-E6038; published ahead of print June 6, 2018 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1717782115
Pang-Dian Fan
aDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065;bHuman Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Pang-Dian Fan
  • For correspondence: fanp@mskcc.orgvarmus@med.cornell.eduladanyim@mskcc.org
Giuseppe Narzisi
cComputational Biology, New York Genome Center, New York, NY 10013;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anitha D. Jayaprakash
dTechnology Innovation Lab, New York Genome Center, New York, NY 10013;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elisa Venturini
eProject Management, New York Genome Center, New York, NY 10013;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicolas Robine
cComputational Biology, New York Genome Center, New York, NY 10013;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter Smibert
dTechnology Innovation Lab, New York Genome Center, New York, NY 10013;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Soren Germer
fSequencing Operations, New York Genome Center, New York, NY 10013;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Helena A. Yu
gDivision of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Emmet J. Jordan
gDivision of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul K. Paik
gDivision of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yelena Y. Janjigian
gDivision of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jamie E. Chaft
gDivision of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lu Wang
aDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Achim A. Jungbluth
aDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sumit Middha
aDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lee Spraggon
aDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065;bHuman Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Huan Qiao
hVanderbilt–Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christine M. Lovly
hVanderbilt–Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark G. Kris
gDivision of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gregory J. Riely
gDivision of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Katerina Politi
iDepartment of Pathology and the Yale Cancer Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06520;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Harold Varmus
jCancer Biology and Genetics Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: fanp@mskcc.orgvarmus@med.cornell.eduladanyim@mskcc.org
Marc Ladanyi
aDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065;bHuman Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: fanp@mskcc.orgvarmus@med.cornell.eduladanyim@mskcc.org
  1. Contributed by Harold Varmus, May 8, 2018 (sent for review October 12, 2017; reviewed by Levi Garraway and Alice T. Shaw)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Significance

Despite high response rates to treatment with small molecule inhibitors of EGFR tyrosine kinase activity, patients with EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinomas eventually develop resistance to these drugs. In many cases, the basis of acquired resistance remains unclear. We have used a transposon mutagenesis screen in an EGFR-mutant cell line and clinical genomic sequencing in cases of acquired resistance to identify amplification of YES1 as a targetable mechanism of resistance to EGFR inhibitors in EGFR-mutant lung cancers.

Abstract

In ∼30% of patients with EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinomas whose disease progresses on EGFR inhibitors, the basis for acquired resistance remains unclear. We have integrated transposon mutagenesis screening in an EGFR-mutant cell line and clinical genomic sequencing in cases of acquired resistance to identify mechanisms of resistance to EGFR inhibitors. The most prominent candidate genes identified by insertions in or near the genes during the screen were MET, a gene whose amplification is known to mediate resistance to EGFR inhibitors, and the gene encoding the Src family kinase YES1. Cell clones with transposon insertions that activated expression of YES1 exhibited resistance to all three generations of EGFR inhibitors and sensitivity to pharmacologic and siRNA-mediated inhibition of YES1. Analysis of clinical genomic sequencing data from cases of acquired resistance to EGFR inhibitors revealed amplification of YES1 in five cases, four of which lacked any other known mechanisms of resistance. Preinhibitor samples, available for two of the five patients, lacked YES1 amplification. None of 136 postinhibitor samples had detectable amplification of other Src family kinases (SRC and FYN). YES1 amplification was also found in 2 of 17 samples from ALK fusion-positive lung cancer patients who had progressed on ALK TKIs. Taken together, our findings identify acquired amplification of YES1 as a recurrent and targetable mechanism of resistance to EGFR inhibition in EGFR-mutant lung cancers and demonstrate the utility of transposon mutagenesis in discovering clinically relevant mechanisms of drug resistance.

  • YES1
  • EGFR
  • ALK
  • acquired resistance
  • lung adenocarcinoma

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: fanp{at}mskcc.org, varmus{at}med.cornell.edu, or ladanyim{at}mskcc.org.
  • ↵2Present address: Girihlet Inc., Oakland, CA 94609.

  • ↵3Present address: Department of Translational Science, Personal Genome Diagnostics, Baltimore, MD 21224.

  • ↵4Present address: Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Waterford, Waterford X91 ER8E, Ireland.

  • ↵5Present address: Department of Pathology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105.

  • ↵6Present address: Gene Editing Technologies Group, Oxford Genetics, Oxford OX4 4GA, United Kingdom.

  • ↵7Present addresses: Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065; and New York Genome Center, New York, NY 10013.

  • This work was presented in part at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Chicago, June 2–6, 2017.

  • Author contributions: P.-D.F., K.P., H.V., and M.L. designed research; P.-D.F., G.N., A.D.J., E.V., P.S., H.A.Y., E.J.J., P.K.P., Y.Y.J., J.E.C., L.W., A.A.J., S.M., L.S., H.Q., and G.J.R. performed research; P.-D.F., G.N., A.D.J., N.R., P.S., S.G., and H.Q. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; P.-D.F., G.N., A.D.J., N.R., P.S., S.M., C.M.L., M.G.K., and M.L. analyzed data; and P.-D.F., C.M.L., K.P., H.V., and M.L. wrote the paper.

  • Reviewers: L.G., Eli Lilly; and A.T.S., Massachusetts General Hospital.

  • Conflict of interest statement: H.A.Y. has served on the advisory boards for AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim. Y.Y.J. has received consulting fees from Bristol–Myers Squibb and honoraria from Pfizer, Genentech, and Boehringer Ingelheim. J.E.C. has received consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Genentech, Bristol–Myers Squibb, and Merck. M.G.K. has served as a consultant for AstraZeneca. C.M.L. has served on the Advisory Board for Cepheid Oncology and has received consulting fees from Pfizer, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Genoptix, Sequenom, Ariad, Takeda, and Foundation Medicine. G.J.R. has received consulting fees from Roche, and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) has received support from Pfizer and Roche to fund G.J.R.’s clinical research. K.P. has received research funding from AstraZeneca, Roche, Kolltan, and Symphogen; honoraria for consulting or advisory roles from AstraZeneca, Merck, Novartis, and Tocagen; and royalties from intellectual property licensed by MSKCC to Molecular MD. M.L. has received advisory board compensation from Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Takeda, and Bayer, and research support from LOXO Oncology.

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1717782115/-/DCSupplemental.

  • Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND).

View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
YES1 amplification is a mechanism of acquired resistance to EGFR inhibitors identified by transposon mutagenesis and clinical genomics
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
Citation Tools
YES1 amplification is a mechanism of acquired resistance to EGFR inhibitors identified by transposon mutagenesis and clinical genomics
Pang-Dian Fan, Giuseppe Narzisi, Anitha D. Jayaprakash, Elisa Venturini, Nicolas Robine, Peter Smibert, Soren Germer, Helena A. Yu, Emmet J. Jordan, Paul K. Paik, Yelena Y. Janjigian, Jamie E. Chaft, Lu Wang, Achim A. Jungbluth, Sumit Middha, Lee Spraggon, Huan Qiao, Christine M. Lovly, Mark G. Kris, Gregory J. Riely, Katerina Politi, Harold Varmus, Marc Ladanyi
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Jun 2018, 115 (26) E6030-E6038; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1717782115

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
YES1 amplification is a mechanism of acquired resistance to EGFR inhibitors identified by transposon mutagenesis and clinical genomics
Pang-Dian Fan, Giuseppe Narzisi, Anitha D. Jayaprakash, Elisa Venturini, Nicolas Robine, Peter Smibert, Soren Germer, Helena A. Yu, Emmet J. Jordan, Paul K. Paik, Yelena Y. Janjigian, Jamie E. Chaft, Lu Wang, Achim A. Jungbluth, Sumit Middha, Lee Spraggon, Huan Qiao, Christine M. Lovly, Mark G. Kris, Gregory J. Riely, Katerina Politi, Harold Varmus, Marc Ladanyi
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Jun 2018, 115 (26) E6030-E6038; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1717782115
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 116 (7)
Current Issue

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Several aspects of the proposal, which aims to expand open access, require serious discussion and, in some cases, a rethink.
Opinion: “Plan S” falls short for society publishers—and for the researchers they serve
Several aspects of the proposal, which aims to expand open access, require serious discussion and, in some cases, a rethink.
Image credit: Dave Cutler (artist).
Several large or long-lived animals seem strangely resistant to developing cancer. Elucidating the reasons why could lead to promising cancer-fighting strategies in humans.
Core Concept: Solving Peto’s Paradox to better understand cancer
Several large or long-lived animals seem strangely resistant to developing cancer. Elucidating the reasons why could lead to promising cancer-fighting strategies in humans.
Image credit: Shutterstock.com/ronnybas frimages.
Featured Profile
PNAS Profile of NAS member and biochemist Hao Wu
 Nonmonogamous strawberry poison frog (Oophaga pumilio).  Image courtesy of Yusan Yang (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh).
Putative signature of monogamy
A study suggests a putative gene-expression hallmark common to monogamous male vertebrates of some species, namely cichlid fishes, dendrobatid frogs, passeroid songbirds, common voles, and deer mice, and identifies 24 candidate genes potentially associated with monogamy.
Image courtesy of Yusan Yang (University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh).
Active lifestyles. Image courtesy of Pixabay/MabelAmber.
Meaningful life tied to healthy aging
Physical and social well-being in old age are linked to self-assessments of life worth, and a spectrum of behavioral, economic, health, and social variables may influence whether aging individuals believe they are leading meaningful lives.
Image courtesy of Pixabay/MabelAmber.

More Articles of This Classification

  • Reactive oxygen species modulate macrophage immunosuppressive phenotype through the up-regulation of PD-L1
  • Metalearners for estimating heterogeneous treatment effects using machine learning
  • E-protein regulatory network links TCR signaling to effector Treg cell differentiation
Show more

Related Content

  • PNAS Plus Significance Statements
  • Scopus
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited by...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Latest Articles
  • Archive

PNAS Portals

  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Teaching Resources
  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Press
  • Site Map

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2019 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490