New Research In
Physical Sciences
Social Sciences
Featured Portals
Articles by Topic
Biological Sciences
Featured Portals
Articles by Topic
- Agricultural Sciences
- Anthropology
- Applied Biological Sciences
- Biochemistry
- Biophysics and Computational Biology
- Cell Biology
- Developmental Biology
- Ecology
- Environmental Sciences
- Evolution
- Genetics
- Immunology and Inflammation
- Medical Sciences
- Microbiology
- Neuroscience
- Pharmacology
- Physiology
- Plant Biology
- Population Biology
- Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
- Sustainability Science
- Systems Biology
Understanding refugee naturalization as partnership

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Acquisition of citizenship may be viewed as an end point of immigrant integration, but recent research suggests that early naturalization catalyzes further incorporation (1, 2). In the United States, naturalized citizens acquire legal advantages, including protection from deportation; broader rights in the judicial system; greater access to social benefits; the ability to vote and travel on a US passport; and eligibility for certain jobs in government, the military, and the defense industry (3). Advantages may also extend beyond formal law, providing new citizens with a stronger sense of social standing and signaling inclusion to would-be employers, landlords, and others, dynamics that may translate into higher wages, stronger national identity, and more democratic participation (4). Thus, for policy makers, evidence that refugees acquire US citizenship quickly and at high rates not only provides evidence of integration but also raises the possibility of other long-term positive effects (5). Methodologically, the research by Mossaad et al. (5) highlights the value of data partnerships. Theoretically, the findings open a conversation to view naturalization as an outcome of migrant–host society partnership.
Evidence-Based Analysis Through Data Partnerships
In 1985, the National Academies investigated the US government’s immigration data collection and prospects for evidence-based analysis of integration (6). The report’s subtitle, “A Story of Neglect,” communicates its major findings that “inadequate, incomplete and often unreliable information” means that “policy has been made in a data vacuum.” Internal data quality has improved, but 30 y later, the National Academies again called on the US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) to improve data quality and, especially, access (3). Independent analyses of immigrant integration have been hampered by an almost impenetrable administrative wall shutting microdata collected by the Immigration and Naturalization Service and USCIS away from nonagency staff, with only a handful of exceptions (7). The immigration data wall has forced researchers …
↵1Email: bloemr{at}berkeley.edu.
Log in using your username and password
Purchase access
Subscribers, for more details, please visit our Subscriptions FAQ.
Please click here to log into the PNAS submission website.
Citation Manager Formats
Sign up for Article Alerts
Jump to section
You May Also be Interested in
More Articles of This Classification
Related Content
Cited by...
- No citing articles found.
See related content: