Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
    • PNAS Nexus
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Publication Charges
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
    • PNAS Nexus
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Publication Charges
  • Submit
Research Article

Deep learning to represent subgrid processes in climate models

View ORCID ProfileStephan Rasp, Michael S. Pritchard, and Pierre Gentine
  1. aMeteorological Institute, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, 80333 Munich, Germany;
  2. bDepartment of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697;
  3. cDepartment of Earth and Environmental Engineering, Earth Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027;
  4. dData Science Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS September 25, 2018 115 (39) 9684-9689; first published September 6, 2018; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1810286115
Stephan Rasp
aMeteorological Institute, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, 80333 Munich, Germany;
bDepartment of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Stephan Rasp
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Michael S. Pritchard
bDepartment of Earth System Science, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pierre Gentine
cDepartment of Earth and Environmental Engineering, Earth Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027;
dData Science Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  1. Edited by Isaac M. Held, Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Princeton, NJ, and approved August 8, 2018 (received for review June 14, 2018)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Significance

Current climate models are too coarse to resolve many of the atmosphere’s most important processes. Traditionally, these subgrid processes are heuristically approximated in so-called parameterizations. However, imperfections in these parameterizations, especially for clouds, have impeded progress toward more accurate climate predictions for decades. Cloud-resolving models alleviate many of the gravest issues of their coarse counterparts but will remain too computationally demanding for climate change predictions for the foreseeable future. Here we use deep learning to leverage the power of short-term cloud-resolving simulations for climate modeling. Our data-driven model is fast and accurate, thereby showing the potential of machine-learning–based approaches to climate model development.

Abstract

The representation of nonlinear subgrid processes, especially clouds, has been a major source of uncertainty in climate models for decades. Cloud-resolving models better represent many of these processes and can now be run globally but only for short-term simulations of at most a few years because of computational limitations. Here we demonstrate that deep learning can be used to capture many advantages of cloud-resolving modeling at a fraction of the computational cost. We train a deep neural network to represent all atmospheric subgrid processes in a climate model by learning from a multiscale model in which convection is treated explicitly. The trained neural network then replaces the traditional subgrid parameterizations in a global general circulation model in which it freely interacts with the resolved dynamics and the surface-flux scheme. The prognostic multiyear simulations are stable and closely reproduce not only the mean climate of the cloud-resolving simulation but also key aspects of variability, including precipitation extremes and the equatorial wave spectrum. Furthermore, the neural network approximately conserves energy despite not being explicitly instructed to. Finally, we show that the neural network parameterization generalizes to new surface forcing patterns but struggles to cope with temperatures far outside its training manifold. Our results show the feasibility of using deep learning for climate model parameterization. In a broader context, we anticipate that data-driven Earth system model development could play a key role in reducing climate prediction uncertainty in the coming decade.

  • climate modeling
  • deep learning
  • subgrid parameterization
  • convection

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: s.rasp{at}lmu.de.
  • Author contributions: M.S.P. and P.G. designed research; S.R. and M.S.P. performed research; S.R. analyzed data; and S.R., M.S.P., and P.G. wrote the paper.

  • The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  • This article is a PNAS Direct Submission.

  • Data deposition: All code can be found in the following repositories: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1402384 and https://gitlab.com/mspritch/spcam3.0-neural-net/tree/nn_fbp_engy_ess.

  • This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1810286115/-/DCSupplemental.

  • Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND).

View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Deep learning to represent subgrid processes in climate models
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Deep learning to represent subgrid processes in climate models
Stephan Rasp, Michael S. Pritchard, Pierre Gentine
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Sep 2018, 115 (39) 9684-9689; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1810286115

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Deep learning to represent subgrid processes in climate models
Stephan Rasp, Michael S. Pritchard, Pierre Gentine
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Sep 2018, 115 (39) 9684-9689; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1810286115
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Article Classifications

  • Physical Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 115 (39)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Climate Model and Neural Network Setup
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Protective infrastructure along the San Francisco Bay shoreline.
Economic impact of sea level rise protection
Infrastructure built to protect cities from flooding can increase economic damages elsewhere.
Image credit: Michelle A. Hummel.
Venus.
Abiotic source of phosphine on Venus
Phosphine in the Venusian atmosphere can be explained without biogenic sources and is consistent with ongoing volcanism on Venus.
Image credit: Wikimedia Commons/NASA.
Coronavirus.
Estimating true number of COVID-19 infections
A study finds underreporting of COVID-19 cases in the United States and that the United States is likely far from achieving herd immunity through infection alone.
Image credit: Pixabay/geralt.
Three test tubes with lethal doses of heroin, carfentanil, and fentanyl.
Inner Workings: Vaccines aim to fight drugs of abuse
Researchers hope vaccines can serve as a key tool for addressing the opioid epidemic. The first clinical trials are underway, though big challenges remain.
Image credit: United States Drug Enforcement Administration.
Factories belch pollution into a hazy sky as the sun peaks out from behind the clouds.
Journal Club: How to incorporate changing human behaviors into planetary models
Eyeing the effects of the Anthropocene, researchers offer a novel framework to identify and combine models from across the physical and social sciences.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Victor Lauer.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Cozzarelli Prize
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490. PNAS is a partner of CHORUS, COPE, CrossRef, ORCID, and Research4Life.