Comparative immunogenicity and efficacy of equivalent outer membrane vesicle and glycoconjugate vaccines against nontyphoidal Salmonella
- aGSK Vaccines Institute for Global Health S.r.l. (GVGH), 53100 Siena, Italy2;
- bWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Cambridge CB10 1SA, United Kingdom;
- cDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0ES, United Kingdom;
- dGSK, 53100 Siena, Italy;
- eJenner Institute, Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, United Kingdom
See allHide authors and affiliations
Contributed by Rino Rappuoli, August 9, 2018 (sent for review May 4, 2018; reviewed by S. Abrignani and Brian M. Greenwood)

Significance
Bacteria, such as nontyphoidal Salmonella, are responsible for a large global burden of disease. Due to limited need in developed countries and consequent lack of commercial incentive, vaccines are unavailable against many bacteria. Glycoconjugates constitute the standard bacterial vaccine approach, but can be costly, particularly where multivalent preparations are required. This report compares a low-cost vesicle-based technology, known as Generalized Modules for Membrane Antigens (GMMA), with glycoconjugate in bivalent vaccines against nontyphoidal Salmonella. In head-to-head immunogenicity and infection studies in mice, GMMA performed at least as well as equivalent glycoconjugate vaccine, indicating good potential of this approach. Given that many bacteria are amenable to genetic engineering for GMMA production, the GMMA strategy could provide a breakthrough for a range of needed bacterial vaccines.
Abstract
Nontyphoidal Salmonellae cause a devastating burden of invasive disease in sub-Saharan Africa with high levels of antimicrobial resistance. Vaccination has potential for a major global health impact, but no licensed vaccine is available. The lack of commercial incentive makes simple, affordable technologies the preferred route for vaccine development. Here we compare equivalent Generalized Modules for Membrane Antigens (GMMA) outer membrane vesicles and O-antigen-CRM197 glycoconjugates to deliver lipopolysaccharide O-antigen in bivalent Salmonella Typhimurium and Enteritidis vaccines. Salmonella strains were chosen and tolR deleted to induce GMMA production. O-antigens were extracted from wild-type bacteria and conjugated to CRM197. Purified GMMA and glycoconjugates were characterized and tested in mice for immunogenicity and ability to reduce Salmonella infection. GMMA and glycoconjugate O-antigen had similar structural characteristics, O-acetylation, and glucosylation levels. Immunization with GMMA induced higher anti–O-antigen IgG than glycoconjugate administered without Alhydrogel adjuvant. With Alhydrogel, antibody levels were similar. GMMA induced a diverse antibody isotype profile with greater serum bactericidal activity than glycoconjugate, which induced almost exclusively IgG1. Immunization reduced bacterial colonization of mice subsequently infected with Salmonella. S. Typhimurium numbers were lower in tissues of mice vaccinated with GMMA compared with glycoconjugate. S. Enteritidis burden in the tissues was similar in mice immunized with either vaccine. With favorable immunogenicity, low cost, and ability to induce functional antibodies and reduce bacterial burden, GMMA offer a promising strategy for the development of a nontyphoidal Salmonella vaccine compared with established glycoconjugates. GMMA technology is potentially attractive for development of vaccines against other bacteria of global health significance.
Footnotes
- ↵1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: francesca.x.micoli{at}gsk.com or rino.r.rappuoli{at}gsk.com.
↵2This work was initiated at the Novartis Vaccines Institute for Global Health; in March 2015 the Novartis noninfluenza vaccines business was acquired by the GSK group of companies. Thereafter the company became GSK Vaccines Institute for Global Health, an affiliate of GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA.
Author contributions: F.M., S.R., P.M., R.R., A.S., and C.A.M. designed research; F.M., S.R., R.A., L.L., F.N., A.N., O.R., C.B., S.C., and P.M. performed research; F.M., S.R., O.R., P.M., R.R., A.S., and C.A.M. analyzed data; and F.M., S.R., and C.A.M. wrote the paper.
Reviewers: S.A., Istituto Nazionale Genetica Molecolare; and B.M.G., London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
Conflict of interest statement: F.M., S.R., R.A., L.L., F.N., O.R., R.R., and A.S. are employees of the GSK group of companies. A.N. and C.A.M. were employees of NVGH (now GVGH) during part of the study.
This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1807655115/-/DCSupplemental.
- Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.
This open access article is distributed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND).
Citation Manager Formats
Article Classifications
- Biological Sciences
- Microbiology