Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
Commentary

Subterranean clues to the future of our planetary magnetic shield

John A. Tarduno
  1. aDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627;
  2. bDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627;
  3. cSchool of Geological Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4000, South Africa

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS December 26, 2018 115 (52) 13154-13156; first published December 10, 2018; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1819025116
John A. Tarduno
aDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627;
bDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627;
cSchool of Geological Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4000, South Africa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: john.tarduno@rochester.edu
  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

The geomagnetic field, generated in the liquid outer core, provides a shield from cosmic radiation that can cause damage to man-made satellites, electrical power grids, and the ozone layer (1). In the absence of this shield, the solar wind might gradually erode the atmosphere, eventually robbing the planet of its water (2). But the dipole magnetic field has decreased in strength over the last 160 y at an alarming rate (3), motivating continued spirited debate (4⇓–6) over whether we are in the early stages of a geomagnetic pole reversal. Some even believe we are overdue. But 160 y is just a blink of the eye in geological terms. The record is too short to have great confidence about what these trends might mean about causal processes and the future. In PNAS, Trindade et al. (7) provide insightful context for these modern changes in the form of a magnetic record from South America that extends ∼1,500 y into the past.

We know much about the recent waning geomagnetic field; since the time of Gauss in 1840, we have had a rich data source in the form of geomagnetic observatory records. In the satellite era, we have a deluge of data from magnetometers in orbit. From analyses of these data, we know that the field-intensity decrease is concentrated in an area known as the South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA), a vast swatch stretching from South Africa to Chile. Amazingly, when one estimates the field structure beneath this region at the core–mantle boundary, one finds patches of reversed polarity that most likely reflect flux being expulsed from the core (8). In numerical simulations, reversed flux patches are a harbinger of field reversal (9). Hulot et al. (10) have suggested that the patch beneath South Africa is largely responsible for the modern dipole field decrease.

Paleomagnetism, and especially its archeological brand known as archeomagnetism, could potentially provide longer-term context to understand the recent dipole decay. But until recently, archeomagnetic data from the SAA area have been lacking. The first data from the Limpopo River Valley of South Africa, Zimbabwe, and Botswana (Fig. 1) suggest that the SAA is a recurrent feature (11, 12). Subsequent analyses of Pleistocene basalts support this recurrence (13). Moreover, a hypothesis (11) based on the Limpopo data posits that the recurrence reflects a kind of top-down influence on the geodynamo. Specifically, the magnetic field may be driven to small scales as the core’s liquid iron flows beneath the African large low-shear-velocity province, an immense region of unusually hot and/or dense mantle defined by anomalously slow seismic shear waves (14) (Fig. 1). This could stimulate flux expulsion and the formation of reversed flux patches. One prediction of this hypothesis is that reversed flux patches should advect westward with the core flow. However, no comparable magnetic data have been available from South America to test these ideas.

Fig. 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig. 1.

Geomagnetic field intensity and the prominent low-strength region known as the SAA are highlighted. The magnetic field estimated at the core–mantle boundary shows reversed flux patches (22), areas where the field is opposite to its expected polarity. The core–mantle boundary above the African reversed flux patch is unusually hot and/or dense and part of the African large low-shear-velocity province (14). Trindade et al. (7) report geomagnetic direction changes similar to those seen in the Limpopo Valley area of South Africa (11), with an ∼200-y time lag.

The situation has now changed with the work of Trindade et al. (7) who have provided a spectacular archive of geomagnetic field behavior from the very center of the modern SAA. The data come from a seemingly unusual source: stalagmites in the Pau d’Alho cave of Brazil (Fig. 1). Most archeomagnetic data are derived from clay materials that were fired to high temperature. During cooling, their constituent magnetic minerals record the ambient magnetic field. In contrast, stalagmites acquire their magnetization one drop at a time. Water containing magnetic minerals drops onto the stalagmite and, once deposited, these minerals can align with Earth’s magnetic field. These speleothem data do not record absolute field strength like a fired archeomagnetic sample might, but they can provide relative intensity information and, importantly, a log of magnetic directions. In addition, they provide a huge advantage relative to the spot readings of most archeomagnetic datasets in that they can be virtually continuous.

This decade has seen a renaissance in speleothem magnetization studies (15, 16). U-Th radiometric age dating (17) provides the all-important timescale, whereas continued investigations in the discipline of rock magnetism provide insight into the magnetic mineral carriers and their magnetic recording fidelity. Using this arsenal of tools, Trindade et al. (7) show how the stalagmites they sampled hold minute magnetite particles expected to faithfully preserve the field.

The records are not perfect. Magnetic inclinations from one stalagmite are systematically offset by about 10°, possibly due to magnetic grain rolling. The relative magnetic intensity records show short-term scatter that is probably experimental noise rather than geomagnetic signal. However, these minor imperfections do not detract from the exciting results. In particular, Trindade et al. (7) focus on the robust directional data and note rapid variations exceeding 0.10°/y between approximately 860 to 960 CE and approximately 1450 to 1750 CE. These lag the record of rapid field variations recorded from the Limpopo region (11, 12) by ∼200 y. The new Pau d’Alho speleothem data thus support the recurrence of fast field variations linked to the SAA and westward advection of anomalous flux patches (11).

The results of Trindade et al. (7) highlight the potential for further tracing of field behavior associated with the SAA back in time and space to discriminate between far-reaching but differing viewpoints on the nature of the geodynamo. In one interpretation, reversed flux patches are purely intrinsic to the flow of iron in the core, without any influence of the overlying mantle. Hence, the occurrence of flux expulsion, reversed flux patches, and other anomalous features such as field-strength spikes (18) or high secular variation (19) would not have any geographic preference. Reversals should also not nucleate in any preferred location beneath the mantle. In contrast, in the top-down hypothesis, the core–mantle boundary stimulates flux expulsion and formation of reversed flux patches, and this could occasionally lead to a field reversal (11). In yet another interpretation, a bottom-up control on the geodynamo driven by the interaction of the inner core with the fluid outer core could also lead to geographic preferences in geomagnetic field behavior departing from that of a simple dipole (20).

The tracking of anomalies denoted by Trindade et al. (7) gives a nod to top-down control of the geodynamo, but more data will be needed before the community can fully evaluate these viewpoints and better parse the related processes. Irrespective of the details of that outcome, the recurrence of changes documented by Trindade et al. (7) provides motivation to use the past as a guide to the future. The nadir of the last occurrence of low intensity recorded in the Limpopo (11) and efforts to forecast the field (21) give us reason to believe that the global field-intensity decay will continue in the coming century. This should be a call to arms to further improve the resiliency of satellites and infrastructure as our planetary magnetic shield becomes ever more imperfect.

Acknowledgments

J.A.T.’s research is supported by the National Science Foundation Grants EAR-1448227 and EAR-1656348.

Footnotes

  • ↵1Email: john.tarduno{at}rochester.edu.
  • Author contributions: J.A.T. wrote the paper.

  • The author declares no conflict of interest.

  • See companion article on page 13198.

Published under the PNAS license.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Heirtzler JR
    (2002) The future of the South Atlantic anomaly and implications for radiation damage in space. J Atmos Sol Terr Phys 64:1701–1708.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Tarduno JA,
    2. Blackman E,
    3. Mamajek E
    (2014) Detecting the oldest geodynamo and attendant shielding from the solar wind: Implications for habitability. Phys Earth Planet Inter 233:68–87.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Olson P,
    2. Amit H
    (2006) Changes in earth’s dipole. Naturwissenschaften 93:519–542.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. De Santis A,
    2. Qamili E,
    3. Wu L
    (2013) Toward a possible next geomagnetic transition? Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13:3395–3403.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Laj C,
    2. Kissel C
    (2015) An impending geomagnetic transition? Hints from the past. Front Earth Sci 3:61.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Brown M,
    2. Korte M,
    3. Holme R,
    4. Wardinski I,
    5. Gunnarson S
    (2018) Earth’s magnetic field is probably not reversing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115:5111–5116.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Trindade RIF, et al.
    (2018) Speleothem record of geomagnetic South Atlantic Anomaly recurrence. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115:13198–13203.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Bloxham J
    (1986) The expulsion of magnetic flux from Earth’s core. Geophys J R Astron Soc 87:669–678.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. ↵
    1. Glatzmeir GA,
    2. Roberts PH
    (1995) A three-dimensional self-consistent computer simulation of a geomagnetic reversal. Nature 377:203–209.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    1. Hulot G,
    2. Eymin C,
    3. Langlais B,
    4. Mandea M,
    5. Olsen N
    (2002) Small-scale structure of the geodynamo inferred from Oersted and Magsat satellite data. Nature 416:620–623.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Tarduno JA, et al.
    (2015) Antiquity of the South Atlantic Anomaly and evidence for top-down control on the geodynamo. Nat Commun 6:7865.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Hare VJ, et al.
    (2018) New archeomagnetic directional records from Iron Age southern Africa (ca. 425-1550 CE) and implications for the South Atlantic Anomaly. Geophys Res Lett 45:1361–1369.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Shah J, et al.
    (2016) Palaeomagnetic evidence for the persistence or recurrence of geomagnetic main field anomalies in the South Atlantic. Earth Planet Sci Lett 441:113–124.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Garnero EJ,
    2. McNamara AK,
    3. Shim S-H
    (2016) Continent-sized anomalous zones with low seismic velocity at the base of Earth’s mantle. Nat Geosci 9:481–489.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. ↵
    1. Lascu I,
    2. Feinberg JM
    (2011) Speleothem magnetism. Quat Sci Rev 30:3306–3320.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Zhu Z, et al.
    (2017) Holocene ENSO-related cyclic storms recorded by magnetic minerals in speleothems of central China. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:852–857.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Lascu I,
    2. Feinberg JM,
    3. Dorale JA,
    4. Cheng H,
    5. Edwards RL
    (2016) Age of the Laschamp excursion determined by U-Th dating of a speleothem geomagnetic record from North America. Geology 44:139–142.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Shaar R, et al.
    (2011) Geomagnetic field intensity: How high can it get? How fast can it change? Constraints from iron copper slag. Earth Planet Sci Lett 301:297–306.
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    1. Constable C,
    2. Korte M,
    3. Panovska S
    (2016) Persistent high paleosecular variation activity in southern hemisphere for at least 10000 years. Earth Planet Sci Lett 453:78–86.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Aubert J,
    2. Finlay CC,
    3. Fournier A
    (2013) Bottom-up control of geomagnetic secular variation by the Earth’s inner core. Nature 502:219–223.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Aubert J
    (2015) Geomagnetic forecasts driven by thermal wind dynamics in Earth’s core. Geophys J Int 203:1738–1751.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. ↵
    1. Korte M,
    2. Constable CG
    (2011) Improving geomagnetic field reconstructions for 0-3 ka. Phys Earth Planet Inter 188:247–259.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Subterranean clues to the future of our planetary magnetic shield
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Subterranean clues to the future of our planetary magnetic shield
John A. Tarduno
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Dec 2018, 115 (52) 13154-13156; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1819025116

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Subterranean clues to the future of our planetary magnetic shield
John A. Tarduno
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Dec 2018, 115 (52) 13154-13156; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1819025116
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Article Classifications

  • Physical Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences

See related content:

  • Speleothem record of geomagnetic South Atlantic Anomaly recurrence
    - Dec 10, 2018
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 115 (52)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Water from a faucet fills a glass.
News Feature: How “forever chemicals” might impair the immune system
Researchers are exploring whether these ubiquitous fluorinated molecules might worsen infections or hamper vaccine effectiveness.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Dmitry Naumov.
Reflection of clouds in the still waters of Mono Lake in California.
Inner Workings: Making headway with the mysteries of life’s origins
Recent experiments and simulations are starting to answer some fundamental questions about how life came to be.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Radoslaw Lecyk.
Cave in coastal Kenya with tree growing in the middle.
Journal Club: Small, sharp blades mark shift from Middle to Later Stone Age in coastal Kenya
Archaeologists have long tried to define the transition between the two time periods.
Image credit: Ceri Shipton.
Illustration of groups of people chatting
Exploring the length of human conversations
Adam Mastroianni and Daniel Gilbert explore why conversations almost never end when people want them to.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Panda bear hanging in a tree
How horse manure helps giant pandas tolerate cold
A study finds that giant pandas roll in horse manure to increase their cold tolerance.
Image credit: Fuwen Wei.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Cozzarelli Prize
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490