Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Fees and Licenses
  • Submit
Research Article

Pliocene and Eocene provide best analogs for near-future climates

View ORCID ProfileK. D. Burke, View ORCID ProfileJ. W. Williams, View ORCID ProfileM. A. Chandler, View ORCID ProfileA. M. Haywood, View ORCID ProfileD. J. Lunt, and View ORCID ProfileB. L. Otto-Bliesner
  1. aNelson Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706;
  2. bDepartment of Geography and Center for Climatic Research, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706;
  3. cCenter for Climate Systems Research, Columbia University, New York, NY 10025;
  4. dGoddard Institute for Space Studies, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), New York, NY 10025;
  5. eSchool of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT Leeds, United Kingdom;
  6. fSchool of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, BS8 1SS Bristol, United Kingdom;
  7. gClimate and Global Dynamics Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80305

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS December 26, 2018 115 (52) 13288-13293; first published December 10, 2018; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1809600115
K. D. Burke
aNelson Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for K. D. Burke
  • For correspondence: kdburke@wisc.edu
J. W. Williams
bDepartment of Geography and Center for Climatic Research, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, WI 53706;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for J. W. Williams
M. A. Chandler
cCenter for Climate Systems Research, Columbia University, New York, NY 10025;
dGoddard Institute for Space Studies, National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), New York, NY 10025;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for M. A. Chandler
A. M. Haywood
eSchool of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT Leeds, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for A. M. Haywood
D. J. Lunt
fSchool of Geographical Sciences, University of Bristol, BS8 1SS Bristol, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for D. J. Lunt
B. L. Otto-Bliesner
gClimate and Global Dynamics Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80305
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for B. L. Otto-Bliesner
  1. Edited by Noah S. Diffenbaugh, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, and accepted by Editorial Board Member Robert E. Dickinson November 6, 2018 (received for review June 29, 2018)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & SI

Figures

  • Related Data
  • Fig. 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 1.

    Temperature trends for the past 65 Ma and potential geohistorical analogs for future climates. Six geohistorical states (red arrows) of the climate system are analyzed as potential analogs for future climates. For context, they are situated next to a multi-timescale time series of global mean annual temperatures for the last 65 Ma. Major patterns include a long-term cooling trend, periodic fluctuations driven by changes in the Earth’s orbit at periods of 104–105 y, and recent and projected warming trends. Temperature anomalies are relative to 1961–1990 global means and are composited from five proxy-based reconstructions, modern observations, and future temperature projections for four emissions pathways (Materials and Methods). Pal, Paleocene; Mio, Miocene; Oli, Oligocene.

  • Fig. 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 2.

    Time series of the closest geohistorical climatic analogs for projected climates, 2020–2280 CE (MD). Colored lines indicate the proportion of terrestrial grid cells for each future decade with the closest climatic match to climates from six potential geohistorical climate analogs: Early Eocene, Mid-Pliocene, LIG, Mid-Holocene, preindustrial, and historical for RCP8.5 (A) and RCP4.5 (B). No LIG simulation from GISS was available at the time of analysis.

  • Fig. 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 3.

    Projected geographic distribution of future climate analogs (RCP8.5). Future climate analogs for 2020, 2050, 2100, and 2200 CE according to the ensemble median. Geohistorical periods are rank ordered according to global mean annual temperature as follows: preindustrial, historical, Mid-Holocene, LIG, Pliocene, and Eocene, with no analog placed at the end due to the prevalence of no-analog climates in the warmest and wettest portion of climate space (Fig. 4). Hence, a projected future location matched to Pliocene, Eocene, and no analog in the three ESMs would be identified as Eocene in the ensemble median.

  • Fig. 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Fig. 4.

    Projected future climate space by closest analog (RCP 8.5). (Upper) DJF vs. JJA temperature space. (Lower) DJF vs. JJA precipitation space. Each point represents a terrestrial grid location from the model ensemble for the specified decade in the RCP8.5 projection. Points are color coded according to the geohistorical climate from which their closest analog sources. Box-and-whisker plots show the data range, median, and first and third quartiles for two time periods: the specified decade (black) and 2020 CE for reference (gray).

Related Data

  • Figures

Data supplements

  • Supporting Information

    • Download Appendix (PDF)
    • Download Movie_S01 (GIF) - CCSM Climate Analog Animation (RCP8.5). This animation shows the spatial distribution of future climate analogs under RCP8.5 for CCSM. Each decade from 2020 to 2280 CE is shown, and locations are color-coded according to the reference geohistorical state from which their closest climatic analog was sourced.
    • Download Movie_S02 (GIF) - HadCM Climate Analog Animation (RCP8.5). This animation shows the spatial distribution of future climate analogs under RCP8.5 for HadCM. Each decade from 2020 to 2280 CE is shown, and locations are color-coded according to the reference geohistorical state from which their closest climatic analog was sourced.
    • Download Movie_S03 (GIF) - GISS Climate Analog Animation (RCP8.5). This animation shows the spatial distribution of future climate analogs under RCP8.5 for GISS. Each decade from 2020 to 2280 CE is shown, and locations are color-coded according to the reference geohistorical state from which their closest climatic analog was sourced. No simulation of the Last Interglacial was available for GISS at time of publication.
    • Download Movie_S04 (GIF) - CCSM Climate Analog Animation (RCP4.5). This animation shows the spatial distribution of future climate analogs under RCP4.5 for CCSM. Each decade from 2020 to 2280 CE is shown, and locations are color-coded according to the reference geohistorical state from which their closest climatic analog was sourced.
    • Download Movie_S05 (GIF) - HadCM Climate Analog Animation (RCP4.5). This animation shows the spatial distribution of future climate analogs under RCP4.5 for HadCM. Each decade from 2020 to 2280 CE is shown, and locations are color-coded according to the reference geohistorical state from which their closest climatic analog was sourced.
    • Download Movie_S06 (GIF) - GISS Climate Analog Animation (RCP4.5). This animation shows the spatial distribution of future climate analogs under RCP4.5 for GISS. Each decade from 2020 to 2280 CE is shown, and locations are color-coded according to the reference geohistorical state from which their closest climatic analog was sourced. No simulation of the Last Interglacial was available for GISS at time of publication.
    • Download Movie_S07 (GIF) - Median Climate Analog Animation (RCP8.5). This animation shows the spatial distribution of future climate analogs under RCP8.5 for the ensemble median. Each decade from 2020 to 2280 CE is shown, and locations are color-coded according to the reference geohistorical state from which their closest climatic analog was sourced.
    • Download Movie_S08 (GIF) - Median Climate Analog Animation (RCP4.5). This animation shows the spatial distribution of future climate analogs under RCP4.5 for the ensemble median. Each decade from 2020 to 2280 CE is shown, and locations are color-coded according to the reference geohistorical state from which their closest climatic analog was sourced.

Related Data

PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Pliocene and Eocene provide best analogs for near-future climates
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Pliocene and Eocene provide best analogs for near-future climates
K. D. Burke, J. W. Williams, M. A. Chandler, A. M. Haywood, D. J. Lunt, B. L. Otto-Bliesner
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Dec 2018, 115 (52) 13288-13293; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1809600115

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
Pliocene and Eocene provide best analogs for near-future climates
K. D. Burke, J. W. Williams, M. A. Chandler, A. M. Haywood, D. J. Lunt, B. L. Otto-Bliesner
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Dec 2018, 115 (52) 13288-13293; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1809600115
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Article Classifications

  • Biological Sciences
  • Ecology
  • Physical Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 115 (52)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Identifying the Closest Paleoclimatic Analogs for Near-Future Earth
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Materials and Methods
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Smoke emanates from Japan’s Fukushima nuclear power plant a few days after tsunami damage
Core Concept: Muography offers a new way to see inside a multitude of objects
Muons penetrate much further than X-rays, they do essentially zero damage, and they are provided for free by the cosmos.
Image credit: Science Source/Digital Globe.
Water from a faucet fills a glass.
News Feature: How “forever chemicals” might impair the immune system
Researchers are exploring whether these ubiquitous fluorinated molecules might worsen infections or hamper vaccine effectiveness.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Dmitry Naumov.
Venus flytrap captures a fly.
Journal Club: Venus flytrap mechanism could shed light on how plants sense touch
One protein seems to play a key role in touch sensitivity for flytraps and other meat-eating plants.
Image credit: Shutterstock/Kuttelvaserova Stuchelova.
Illustration of groups of people chatting
Exploring the length of human conversations
Adam Mastroianni and Daniel Gilbert explore why conversations almost never end when people want them to.
Listen
Past PodcastsSubscribe
Panda bear hanging in a tree
How horse manure helps giant pandas tolerate cold
A study finds that giant pandas roll in horse manure to increase their cold tolerance.
Image credit: Fuwen Wei.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Cozzarelli Prize
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2021 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490